2. She introduces herself and a brain scientist, and asks questions that
many have asked in the past.
She presents many of the questions about the problems associated
with playing video games for extended periods of time.
3. This talk is the latest example describing the benefits of
gaming and debunking the common knowledge
that says games are bad for your health
4. She engages the audience with intellect
and scientific method.
Using medians of pure curiosity and
popular video games like “Call of Duty”.
She also engages the audience directly
with participation.
5. Dynamism Rating: 4 out of 5
While I think the presentation was very
interesting, it lacked on entertainment.
She was calculated and intellectual.
It didn’t fit what she was talking about.
6. She follows Nancy Duarte and presents her method
effectively and efficiently.
She taught me the intellect is not lost. Even in
a study like your brain on video games.
7. Sir Ken Robinson is engaging and entertaining
when talking about issues important to him.
He uses comedy and politics and makes fun of
current education system.
8. Daphne Bavelier is much more calculated.
She uses the visuals to prove to the
audience what she is saying directly on the
spot.
9. My advice to my classmates
is that you should use rational
and objective methods to present
controversial ideas.
