3. |
Living in the Suburbs – some of the pros and cons
October 2015Guiding development to accesible locations 3
Good Not so good
More affordable housing Access to job opportunities
More green space/gardens Local shopping/leisure
Better schools The School Run
Easier parking More dependence on car
Rail access to Central London Local public transport
Less congestion Getting around on foot/cycle
4. |
House prices and rail fares
October 2015Guiding development to accesible locations 4
£1450 - £1600 £1950 - £2600
£1600 - £1950 £2600 +0 - £1450
Monthly cost
● Indicator reflects combined
cost of living/commuting in
South East England
● Based on Land Registry house
price data and average
deposits
● Combined cost falls
significantly in pockets:
NE/SE London
Heathrow
● The gap is getting wider
● Increased propensity for
commuting to Centre
5. |
Planned Rail Improvements – Implications for Outer Suburbs?
October 2015Guiding development to accesible locations 5
£1450 - £1600 £1950 - £2600
£1600 - £1950 £2600 +
Monthly cost
6. |
Peak Hour Car Use – how can we reduce it?
October 2015Guiding development to accesible locations 6
• Plan showing car mode share by district
• Central, Inner, Outer London + ring of
districts/Boroughs immediately outside
• From 2011 Census
7. |
Car Ownership – has it peaked?
October 2015Guiding development to accesible locations 7
• Plan showing car ownership by district
• Central, Inner, Outer London + ring of
districts/Boroughs immediately outside
• From 2011 Census
• Has car ownership peaked
8. |
Peak Hour Cycle Use – how can we increase it?
October 2015Guiding development to accesible locations 8
• Plan showing cycle journey to work mode
shares by District/Borough
• From 2011 Census
9. |
Accessible locations – is PTAL best tool?
Example bullet point for longer sentences and
paragraphs.
It will take a UK-wide perspective, taking appropriate
account of the national, regional and local
implications of any proposals.
It should consider all factors relevant to a thorough
assessment of relevant options, including
environmental, economic and social costs and
benefits, and, where necessary, operational,
commercial and technical viability.
The objective is to identify and recommend to
Government options for maintaining the UK’s status
as an international hub for aviation.
October 2015Guiding development to accesible locations 9
10. |
Reducing car use – Transport Enhancements
October 2015
Guiding development to accesible locations
10
Better walking networks
Comprehensive cycle networks
Quietways
mini-Hollands
Enhanced cycle parking
At major nodes
Within new developments
Cycle hire schemes
Orbital public transport improvements
Improved access to taxis – Uber Pool?
Reallocation of roadspace:
Priority lanes
HOV lanes
Car clubs – including electric vehicles
11. |
Reducing car use – Planning/Policy Interventions
October 2015
Guiding development to accesible locations
11
Encourage higher density development
Wider range of land-uses
Direct development/improve attractiveness of
existing centres
Improve cycle parking provision in new
developments
Design for and consolidate home deliveries
Incentives to encourage use of public transport?
Enhanced access to taxis – UberPool?
Government initiatives/incentives to encourage
major employers to relocate from Central London?
Reduce parking provision in new developments to
discourage multiple car ownership?
Workplace parking charges?
12. |
Conclusions
October 2015Guiding development to accesible locations 12
Outer London has great potential
Step change in provision needed for
sustainable modes:
Reduce peak hour car use
Improve access to local facilities
Reduce need for multiple car ownership
Higher density development
Underpins public transport viability
Requires reduced car parking provision
Requires better cycle parking provision
Outer London could be the location
of choice for residents and businesses
13. DISCLAIMER: This work may only be used within the context and scope of work
for which Steer Davies Gleave was commissioned and may not be relied upon in
part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person
choosing to use any part of this work without the express and written
permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement
to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom.
Questions
Adrian.cole@sdgworld.net
