Understanding the Pakistan Budgeting Process: Basics and Key Insights
Rise of the Trolls: An Innovation Story
1. Rise of the Trolls: An
Innovation Story
Antigone Peyton
CEO & Founder
Cloudigy Law
An Intellectual Property &
Technology Law Firm
#DCTrolls
#DCWeek
2. Here’s How It Began . . .
It’s an old story
Figure out a system,
then figure out how to game it
3. • Patent rights are not
contingent on using
an invention
You create something new
You file with the USPTO
You disclose your invention
You get your patent
4. Patent Rights
• Right to exclude others
• Violation=infringement
• Using
• Making
• Selling
• Offering to sell
• Importing
5. Now, the game
It’s the 1990s . . .
And the patent litigation business was
born.
6. Patent Litigation Model
• Business=make more
$$ off IP
• Purchase patents for
little $
• Don’t make products
or commercialize
technology
• Lack R&D function
7. Patent Litigation Model
• File lawsuits & send
infringement letters
• Sue many companies at
once
• Several firms make
their reputation on
these suits
• Seek early settlements
for $$$
• Contingent fee or low
effort before trial
14. In the Beginning . . .
• Nathan Myrvold - • Investors included
former Microsoft Microsoft, Apple,
exec Nokia, eBay, Google
• Approached Silicon
Valley’s large tech
companies
• Buy patents and
create a pool to keep
them away from trolls
15. The Metamorphosis
• Intellectual Ventures • Other companies
did not sue directly would sue or send
licensing letters
• Set up shell
companies to place IP • Over 1,300 companies
assets traced to IV
• Sold patents to other
companies
16. The Metamorphosis
• IV now suing directly • Sued Motorola Mobility
for infringement of 6
• Used more than $1.5B patents
of $5B investor capital
• Google acquiring
• Over 35,000 IP assets company
• Over $2B in licensing • Google also an early
revenue investor in IV
17. The NPE Game Plan
• A small town in TX • Has over 2,000 pending
(Eastern District of TX) patent cases
• Known to be Plaintiff • No real TX business
friendly activity required
18. The NPE Game Plan
• License or sue
• Defense litigation
costs approx. $2-5M
• Get settlement
• Give patent license
19. The NPE Game Plan
• Monetizing IP
• More than a nuisance
fee
• Leverage risk of
litigation loss
• Gag on settlement
term disclosure
20. JPEG Patent Attacks
• Forgent Networks &
Global Patent
Holdings patents
• Forgent collected
over $100 million in
licensing fees before
patent was
invalidated
• Licensed to 30
companies & sued 31
more
21. High-Profile Win
• Research in Motion
gave over $612M to
NTP (a patent holding
company) to keep its
Blackberries on
22. What’s the Problem?
• Fees extracted out of • Dragging down
line w/perceived IP companies w/lawsuits
value
• Cost passed on to
• Not making or selling consumers
inventions
• Not bringing products
to market
23. Protection Issues
• Defensive patent suit involving company’s
own patents ineffective
• Not trackable like competitors
• Antitrust & patent misuse charges don’t
work
• No market power
• Suing isn’t patent misuse
24. Minimizing Risk
• Design around costs • Fight clumping of
reduce value of parties with different
potential license products
• Patent watch and • New patent laws don’t
clearances allow one suit against
multiple parties that
• Oppositions in Europe “infringe” a patent
and other countries &
reexaminations at
USPTO
• Centralizing invalidity
research & analysis
25. Minimizing Risk
• Litigating for • Patent aggregation
everyone behaviors and
agreements
• Collaboration among
defendants
• Early settlement
• Patent infringement
insurance
26. Defensive Buying
• Allied Security Trust • RPX Corporation
• 11 high-tech • Defensive Patent
companies that Aggregation
identify & purchase program pulls
key tech patents patents off the open
market
28. Closing Thoughts
• IP monetization • Behaviors drive use
business is here to of pejorative term
stay “troll”
• Innovative $$
strategy
• Well-known “patent
trolls” are similar to
patent pools or
consortiums