This document summarizes the role and work of NEHTA, an organization established by the Australian government to facilitate e-health initiatives. It discusses NEHTA's work on healthcare identifiers and developing a data quality strategy, including defining data quality dimensions, standards, policies, and a maturity model. It also provides advice on prioritizing data quality and ensuring senior management support for these efforts.
1. From Data Quality to Clinical Safety
A year after the Award
Tatiana Stebakova
29 March 2010
2. Role of NEHTA
• NEHTA was set up and funded by Federal, State and
Territory Governments as a separate entity in 2005
• We facilitate and progress e-health for Australia
• Our Board comprises heads of health departments in all
Australian States and Territories
Page 1
4. Data quality strategy
Data Quality Governance
Data Quality Dimensions
1. Semantic
2. Structure
3. Provenance
4. Completeness
5. Consistency
6. Currency
7. Timeliness
8. Accuracy
9. Fitness for Use
Click to add text
10. Compliance
Quality Strategy 11. Quality rating
Quality Framework
Data Quality Standards & Practices
? Structure and format standards adhered to in all data exchanges Data Quality
? Certification of trusted data sources in place
? Community-wide data standards metadata management
Maturity Model
Data
? Exchange schemas are endorsed through data standards oversight
Data
process
Level 1 – Initial
Data Quality Policies & Protocols Level 2 – Repeatable
? Policy-based Data Quality management on individual and at Level 3 – Defined
community level Level 4 – Managed
? Data validation protocols Level 5 - Optimized
? Data Provenance management
Data Quality Technology and Operations Guidelines
? Standardization of Technology components across the community
? Design and service use guidelines
? Standardized techniques and procedures for data validation,
certification, quality assurance , and reporting
Data Quality Performance Management
? Measuring conformance to data quality standards, expectations
? Identifying where significant negative impacts are incurred due to
poor data quality
? Providing longitudinal tracking for identifying and measuring areas
for improvement.
Data Quality Implementation Roadmap
Page 3
5. Data Quality Performance measurement- Metrics
Dimension Characteristic Number of
Metrics
Semantic Data Definitions 3
Name Ambiguity 3
Structure Structural Consistency 22
Provenance Originating Data 3
Source
Completeness Optionality 41
Population density 35
Consistency Capture and collection 14
Presentation 4
Currency Age/Freshness 17
Temporal 1
Time of Release 1
Timeliness Accessibility 3
Response Time 3
Accuracy Precision 15
Value Range 44
Fitness for Use Coverage 49
Identifier Uniqueness 40
Page 4 Search and match 27
6. Advice That Stood the Time
• Data quality means clinical safety in healthcare systems.
• Do not try to educate senior management on the importance of DQ
and
how it works. Just do it. They will thank you later.
• Write clear and detailed DQ requirements, measurements and KPIs .
• Make sure they are included in the design and operational contract.
• Define a clear DQ Strategy and Blueprint. Try to involve the best DQ
practitioners.
• Focus on the quality of attributes, which are strategic for your
business.
• Define a capability maturity model and a roadmap on how to achieve
the
desired level of maturity.
Page 5
7. The Biggest Impact
• Data Quality has full support of Senior Management!
• DQ requirements, measurements and KPIs are mandatory
for
each system or product, developed by NEHTA.
• DQ requirements are included in the design and operational
contract of Healthcare Identification Service and National
Authentication Service for Health.
• The decision is made to involve the best DQ practitioners to
write DQ Strategy and Blueprint for Personally Controlled
Electronic Health Records.
Page 6