SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
J.D. Power and Associates Reports:
Buick and Jaguar Tie to Rank Highest for Vehicle Dependability
Toyota Motor Corporation Captures Ten Segment Awards; Ford Motor Company Garners Four
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif.: 19 March 2009 — Buick and Jaguar each rank highest in vehicle
dependability in a tie, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM (VDS)
released today. Buick improves from a sixth-place ranking in 2008, while Jaguar improves from 10th place.
Following in the top five rankings this year are Lexus, Toyota and Mercury.
Toyota garners five segment awards—more than any other nameplate in 2009—for the Highlander, Prius,
Sequoia, Solara and Tundra. Lexus follows with four segment awards for the ES 330 (in a tie with the Acura RL),
GX 470, LS 430 and SC 430. Lincoln captures two awards for the Mark LT and Zephyr. Models by Acura, Buick,
Dodge, Ford, Honda, Mazda, Mercury, Nissan and Scion each rank highest in one segment.

“Buick has ranked among the top 10 nameplates each year since the study was last redesigned in 2003, while
Jaguar has moved rapidly up the rankings,” said David Sargent, vice president of automotive research at
J.D. Power and Associates. “Lexus remains a very strong competitor in long-term quality. In particular, the
Lexus LS 430 sets the industry standard for dependability, with fewer problems reported than any other model in
the study.”

The study, which measures problems experienced by original owners of three-year-old (2006 model year)
vehicles, has been redesigned to include 202 different problem symptoms across all areas of the vehicle. Overall
dependability is determined by the level of problems experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100), with a lower score
reflecting higher quality. The study is used extensively by vehicle manufacturers worldwide to help design and
build better vehicles—which typically retain higher resale values—and by consumers to help them make more-
informed choices for both new and used vehicles.

“In the current economic climate, consumers are delaying new-vehicle purchases and keeping their vehicles
longer—the average age of a vehicle at trade-in has increased to 73 months in 2009 from 65 months in 2006,”
said Sargent. “This makes vehicle dependability even more critical. Automakers have improved long-term
dependability by an average of 10 percent each year since the inception of the study, which is a testament to the
industry’s commitment to continuously improve and sustain quality, especially long-term quality. Making
improvements in long-term quality not only satisfies customers who are holding onto their vehicles longer, but it
will also influence their decisions when they return to the new-vehicle market or are seeking to purchase a pre-
owned vehicle.”

The study finds that the frequency and severity of component replacement has a particularly strong impact on
customer loyalty intentions. Component areas for which the impact is greatest include engine and transmission.
When engine components are replaced or rebuilt, just 11 percent of customers state that they definitely intend to
purchase or lease another vehicle of the same make, compared with nearly 40 percent among owners who report
replacing no components.


                                                   (Page 1 of 2)
The study also finds that Buick, Lincoln, Mercury and Jaguar owners are less likely to replace components than
owners of other vehicle brands. While component replacement rates are similar for premium and non-premium
makes, there are notable differences between vehicle segments. Owners of models in the premium sporty vehicle
segment are least likely to replace components, while owners of models in the van segment are most likely to
replace components.

The 2009 Vehicle Dependability Study is based on responses from more than 46,000 original owners of 2006
model-year vehicles. The study was fielded in October 2008.
Find more detailed findings on vehicle dependability as well as model photos and specs by reading an article and
reviewing brand and segment dependability ratings at JDPower.com.

About J.D. Power and Associates
Headquartered in Westlake Village, Calif., J.D. Power and Associates is a global marketing information services
company operating in key business sectors including market research, forecasting, performance improvement,
Web intelligence and customer satisfaction. The company’s quality and satisfaction measurements are based on
responses from millions of consumers annually. For more information on car reviews and ratings, car insurance,
health insurance, cell phone ratings, and more, please visit JDPower.com. J.D. Power and Associates is a business
unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies.

About The McGraw-Hill Companies
Founded in 1888, The McGraw-Hill Companies (NYSE: MHP) is a leading global information services provider
meeting worldwide needs in the financial services, education and business information markets through leading
brands such as Standard & Poor’s, McGraw-Hill Education, BusinessWeek and J.D. Power and Associates. The
Corporation has more than 280 offices in 40 countries. Sales in 2008 were $6.4 billion. Additional information is
available at http://www.mcgraw-hill.com.

J.D. Power and Associates Media Relations Contacts:
Karla Tucker; Troy, Mich.; (248) 312-4344; media.relations@jdpa.com
Syvetril Perryman; Westlake Village, Calif.; (805) 418-8103; media.relations@jdpa.com

No advertising or other promotional use can be made of the information in this release without the express prior
written consent of J.D. Power and Associates. www.jdpower.com/corporate

                                                   # # #
                                                (Page 2 of 2)
                                           NOTE: Three charts follow.
J.D. Power and Associates
                                               SM
               2009 Vehicle Dependability Study (VDS)
                                   2009 Nameplate Ranking
                                      Problems per 100 Vehicles
                          0                 100                    200                  300              400

                Buick                               122
             Jaguar                                 122
              Lexus                                  126
              Toyota                                  129
            Mercury                                    134
               Infiniti                                 142
               Acura                                     146
             Lincoln                                     147
            Cadillac                                     148
              Honda                                      148
            Porsche                                       150
                 Audi                                      159
                 Ford                                      159
            Hyundai                                         161
             Subaru                                         162
            Chrysler                                         165
                BMW                                          166
   Industry Average                                           170
                 GMC                                           174
     Mercedes-Benz                                               184
          Chevrolet                                              185
          Mitsubishi                                             185
                Volvo                                            186
             Nissan                                                199
              Dodge                                                 202
                  MINI                                               205
              Saturn                                                  211
                   Kia                                                 218
                 Jeep                                                  220
             Pontiac                                                   220
           HUMMER                                                       221
                Scion                                                   222
                SAAB                                                     226
              Mazda                                                      227
                Isuzu                                                     234
        Land Rover                                                         238
       Volkswagen                                                                260
              Suzuki                                                              263



Source: J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM

Charts and graphs extracted from this press release must be accompanied by a statement identifying J.D. Power
and Associates as the publisher and the J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM as the
source. Rankings are based on numerical scores, and not necessarily on statistical significance. No advertising or
other promotional use can be made of the information in this release or J.D. Power and Associates study results
without the express prior written consent of J.D. Power and Associates.
J.D. Power and Associates
                                               SM
               2009 Vehicle Dependability Study (VDS)
                                 Top Three Models per Segment
                                         Car Segments

                    Sub-Compact Car                                     Compact Premium Sporty Car

              Highest Ranked: Scion xA                                  Highest Ranked: Nissan 350Z
                    Suzuki Aerio                                          Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class
                   Chevrolet Aveo                                                Acura RSX

                       Compact Car                                         Entry Premium Vehicle

            Highest Ranked: Toyota Prius                               Highest Ranked: Lincoln Zephyr
                    Toyota Matrix                                               Cadillac CTS
                    Pontiac Vibe                                               Infiniti G-Series

                  Compact Sporty Car                                        Midsize Premium Car

         Highest Ranked: Mazda MX-5 Miata                              Highest Ranked: Acura RL (tie)
                   Subaru Impreza                                            Lexus ES 330 (tie)
             Pontiac Solstice Convertible                                      Infiniti M-Series

                   Midsize Sporty Car                                        Large Premium Car

           Highest Ranked: Toyota Solara                               Highest Ranked: Lexus LS 430
               Chevrolet Monte Carlo                                         Lincoln Town Car
                   Ford Mustang                                                 Cadillac DTS

                        Midsize Car                                          Premium Sporty Car

          Highest Ranked: Buick LaCrosse                               Highest Ranked: Lexus SC 430
                   Toyota Camry                                                 Porsche 911
                   Mercury Milan                                             Chevrolet Corvette

                         Large Car

     Highest Ranked: Mercury Grand Marquis
                 Buick Lucerne
                Mercury Montego




       For more detailed findings on vehicle quality and dependability performance,
                                  visit www.jdpower.com

Source: J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM

Charts and graphs extracted from this press release must be accompanied by a statement identifying J.D. Power
and Associates as the publisher and the J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM as the
source. Rankings are based on numerical scores, and not necessarily on statistical significance. No advertising or
other promotional use can be made of the information in this release or J.D. Power and Associates study results
without the express prior written consent of J.D. Power and Associates.
J.D. Power and Associates
                                           SM
           2009 Vehicle Dependability Study (VDS)
                         Top Three Models per Segment
                 Truck / Multi-Activity Vehicle (MAV) Segments


                 Compact MAV                                                  Midsize Pickup

     Highest Ranked: Honda Element                                     Highest Ranked: Ford Ranger
               Honda CR-V                                                    Honda Ridgeline
           Mitsubishi Outlander                                               Toyota Tacoma

                  Midsize MAV                                                      Van

   Highest Ranked: Toyota Highlander                               Highest Ranked: Dodge Caravan
            Toyota 4Runner                                                  Ford Freestar
             Buick Rainier                                                  Toyota Sienna

                   Large MAV                                               Midsize Premium MAV

     Highest Ranked: Toyota Sequoia                                    Highest Ranked: Lexus GX 470
             Chevrolet Tahoe                                                    Acura MDX
             Ford Expedition                                               Lexus RX 330/RX400h

                 Large Pickup                                              Large Premium MAV

      Highest Ranked: Toyota Tundra                                Highest Ranked: Lincoln Mark LT
               Ford F-150 LD                                         Land Rover Range Rover Sport
              GMC Sierra LD                                                Lincoln Navigator




       For more detailed findings on vehicle quality and dependability performance,
                                  visit www.jdpower.com



Source: J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM

Charts and graphs extracted from this press release must be accompanied by a statement identifying J.D. Power
and Associates as the publisher and the J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM as the
source. Rankings are based on numerical scores, and not necessarily on statistical significance. No advertising or
other promotional use can be made of the information in this release or J.D. Power and Associates study results
without the express prior written consent of J.D. Power and Associates.

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Costrutti, miti e strategie nella comunicazione d'impresa
Costrutti, miti e strategie nella comunicazione d'impresaCostrutti, miti e strategie nella comunicazione d'impresa
Costrutti, miti e strategie nella comunicazione d'impresaGiuseppe Calabrese
 
SIM Ferramenta para Marketing de Relacionamento
SIM Ferramenta para Marketing de RelacionamentoSIM Ferramenta para Marketing de Relacionamento
SIM Ferramenta para Marketing de RelacionamentoSeo Position Net
 
Viernes_touritalia
Viernes_touritaliaViernes_touritalia
Viernes_touritaliarubia23
 
Идеальная конференция по веб 2.0
Идеальная конференция по веб 2.0Идеальная конференция по веб 2.0
Идеальная конференция по веб 2.0Blogcamp Organization Committee
 
Simposio Tecnico Travessia Cia Athletica - 28/08/2010
Simposio Tecnico Travessia Cia Athletica - 28/08/2010Simposio Tecnico Travessia Cia Athletica - 28/08/2010
Simposio Tecnico Travessia Cia Athletica - 28/08/2010cpnadai
 
Pictures Of The Year
Pictures Of The YearPictures Of The Year
Pictures Of The YearNavalitorul
 
Seven Great Questions
Seven Great QuestionsSeven Great Questions
Seven Great QuestionsPravs J
 
The Stuff That I Like!
The Stuff That I Like!The Stuff That I Like!
The Stuff That I Like!bondu
 
SEO para WordPress - Semana de Comunicação Universidade Veiga de Almeida (Sec...
SEO para WordPress - Semana de Comunicação Universidade Veiga de Almeida (Sec...SEO para WordPress - Semana de Comunicação Universidade Veiga de Almeida (Sec...
SEO para WordPress - Semana de Comunicação Universidade Veiga de Almeida (Sec...Guga Alves
 
рекомендации на лето
рекомендации на леторекомендации на лето
рекомендации на летоFintfin
 
Sentença ACP Favorável aos Catadores de SP
Sentença ACP Favorável aos Catadores de SPSentença ACP Favorável aos Catadores de SP
Sentença ACP Favorável aos Catadores de SPGustavo Cherubine
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Costrutti, miti e strategie nella comunicazione d'impresa
Costrutti, miti e strategie nella comunicazione d'impresaCostrutti, miti e strategie nella comunicazione d'impresa
Costrutti, miti e strategie nella comunicazione d'impresa
 
SIM Ferramenta para Marketing de Relacionamento
SIM Ferramenta para Marketing de RelacionamentoSIM Ferramenta para Marketing de Relacionamento
SIM Ferramenta para Marketing de Relacionamento
 
Viernes_touritalia
Viernes_touritaliaViernes_touritalia
Viernes_touritalia
 
Pasarici
PasariciPasarici
Pasarici
 
Идеальная конференция по веб 2.0
Идеальная конференция по веб 2.0Идеальная конференция по веб 2.0
Идеальная конференция по веб 2.0
 
Simposio Tecnico Travessia Cia Athletica - 28/08/2010
Simposio Tecnico Travessia Cia Athletica - 28/08/2010Simposio Tecnico Travessia Cia Athletica - 28/08/2010
Simposio Tecnico Travessia Cia Athletica - 28/08/2010
 
Pictures Of The Year
Pictures Of The YearPictures Of The Year
Pictures Of The Year
 
Teoria - alguns tópicos
Teoria - alguns tópicosTeoria - alguns tópicos
Teoria - alguns tópicos
 
Seven Great Questions
Seven Great QuestionsSeven Great Questions
Seven Great Questions
 
Jardim Romano
Jardim RomanoJardim Romano
Jardim Romano
 
Generalsynod feb10
Generalsynod feb10Generalsynod feb10
Generalsynod feb10
 
Carpeta institucional
Carpeta institucionalCarpeta institucional
Carpeta institucional
 
Pàdel Torneig Nov 2008
Pàdel Torneig Nov 2008Pàdel Torneig Nov 2008
Pàdel Torneig Nov 2008
 
Photosdutempspass
PhotosdutempspassPhotosdutempspass
Photosdutempspass
 
The Stuff That I Like!
The Stuff That I Like!The Stuff That I Like!
The Stuff That I Like!
 
SEO para WordPress - Semana de Comunicação Universidade Veiga de Almeida (Sec...
SEO para WordPress - Semana de Comunicação Universidade Veiga de Almeida (Sec...SEO para WordPress - Semana de Comunicação Universidade Veiga de Almeida (Sec...
SEO para WordPress - Semana de Comunicação Universidade Veiga de Almeida (Sec...
 
Manastir Huasan
Manastir HuasanManastir Huasan
Manastir Huasan
 
рекомендации на лето
рекомендации на леторекомендации на лето
рекомендации на лето
 
Definition Of Done
Definition Of DoneDefinition Of Done
Definition Of Done
 
Sentença ACP Favorável aos Catadores de SP
Sentença ACP Favorável aos Catadores de SPSentença ACP Favorável aos Catadores de SP
Sentença ACP Favorável aos Catadores de SP
 

Similar to Jd Power Buick Jaguar Rank Highest Dependability03 2009

arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308
arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308
arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308finance27
 
arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308
arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308
arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308finance27
 
06 toyota manufacturing, eko rudianto
06   toyota manufacturing, eko rudianto06   toyota manufacturing, eko rudianto
06 toyota manufacturing, eko rudiantobocah666
 
arvinmeritor 2008_AANY_ArvinMeritor_FINAL_011708
arvinmeritor 2008_AANY_ArvinMeritor_FINAL_011708arvinmeritor 2008_AANY_ArvinMeritor_FINAL_011708
arvinmeritor 2008_AANY_ArvinMeritor_FINAL_011708finance27
 
arvinmeritor lehman02062007
arvinmeritor lehman02062007arvinmeritor lehman02062007
arvinmeritor lehman02062007finance27
 
Autofusion Portfolio
Autofusion PortfolioAutofusion Portfolio
Autofusion Portfoliorvanbeaumont
 
Indian Automotive Industry Presentation 010709
Indian Automotive Industry Presentation 010709Indian Automotive Industry Presentation 010709
Indian Automotive Industry Presentation 010709Workosaur.com
 
2013 Audi Sport Brochure MI | Detroit Audi Dealer
2013 Audi Sport Brochure MI | Detroit Audi Dealer2013 Audi Sport Brochure MI | Detroit Audi Dealer
2013 Audi Sport Brochure MI | Detroit Audi DealerFred Lavery Company
 
Indian Auto Components Industry Presentation 060109
Indian Auto Components Industry Presentation 060109Indian Auto Components Industry Presentation 060109
Indian Auto Components Industry Presentation 060109Workosaur.com
 
Yandex - Russian Automotive Market Update - February 2011
Yandex - Russian Automotive Market Update - February 2011Yandex - Russian Automotive Market Update - February 2011
Yandex - Russian Automotive Market Update - February 2011Preston Carey
 
Driveline Analysis - Global Trucks and Bus
Driveline Analysis - Global Trucks and BusDriveline Analysis - Global Trucks and Bus
Driveline Analysis - Global Trucks and BusAutobei Consulting Group
 
lear 09 2606
lear 09 2606lear 09 2606
lear 09 2606finance16
 
LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet
 LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet
LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meetfinance16
 
arvinmeritor Morgan_Stanley_2007_ARM_Final
arvinmeritor Morgan_Stanley_2007_ARM_Finalarvinmeritor Morgan_Stanley_2007_ARM_Final
arvinmeritor Morgan_Stanley_2007_ARM_Finalfinance27
 
Azure Transit Connect BEV & Balance Hybrids
Azure Transit Connect BEV & Balance HybridsAzure Transit Connect BEV & Balance Hybrids
Azure Transit Connect BEV & Balance Hybridsabarca1
 
LEAR 2004 jpmorgan
 LEAR  2004 jpmorgan LEAR  2004 jpmorgan
LEAR 2004 jpmorganfinance16
 
2011 Ford Mustang; Waldorf, MD
2011 Ford Mustang; Waldorf, MD2011 Ford Mustang; Waldorf, MD
2011 Ford Mustang; Waldorf, MDWaldorf Ford
 
11 Ford Mustang brought to you by your Mid Atlantic Ford Dealer
11 Ford Mustang brought to you by your Mid Atlantic Ford Dealer11 Ford Mustang brought to you by your Mid Atlantic Ford Dealer
11 Ford Mustang brought to you by your Mid Atlantic Ford Dealerleonardtownford
 

Similar to Jd Power Buick Jaguar Rank Highest Dependability03 2009 (20)

arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308
arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308
arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308
 
arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308
arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308
arvinmeritor ARM_JPM_Harbour_Conference_081308
 
06 toyota manufacturing, eko rudianto
06   toyota manufacturing, eko rudianto06   toyota manufacturing, eko rudianto
06 toyota manufacturing, eko rudianto
 
GM News
GM NewsGM News
GM News
 
arvinmeritor 2008_AANY_ArvinMeritor_FINAL_011708
arvinmeritor 2008_AANY_ArvinMeritor_FINAL_011708arvinmeritor 2008_AANY_ArvinMeritor_FINAL_011708
arvinmeritor 2008_AANY_ArvinMeritor_FINAL_011708
 
arvinmeritor lehman02062007
arvinmeritor lehman02062007arvinmeritor lehman02062007
arvinmeritor lehman02062007
 
Autofusion Portfolio
Autofusion PortfolioAutofusion Portfolio
Autofusion Portfolio
 
Indian Automotive Industry Presentation 010709
Indian Automotive Industry Presentation 010709Indian Automotive Industry Presentation 010709
Indian Automotive Industry Presentation 010709
 
2013 Audi Sport Brochure MI | Detroit Audi Dealer
2013 Audi Sport Brochure MI | Detroit Audi Dealer2013 Audi Sport Brochure MI | Detroit Audi Dealer
2013 Audi Sport Brochure MI | Detroit Audi Dealer
 
Indian Auto Components Industry Presentation 060109
Indian Auto Components Industry Presentation 060109Indian Auto Components Industry Presentation 060109
Indian Auto Components Industry Presentation 060109
 
Yandex - Russian Automotive Market Update - February 2011
Yandex - Russian Automotive Market Update - February 2011Yandex - Russian Automotive Market Update - February 2011
Yandex - Russian Automotive Market Update - February 2011
 
Driveline Analysis - Global Trucks and Bus
Driveline Analysis - Global Trucks and BusDriveline Analysis - Global Trucks and Bus
Driveline Analysis - Global Trucks and Bus
 
lear 09 2606
lear 09 2606lear 09 2606
lear 09 2606
 
LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet
 LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet
LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet
 
Rounds E Mobility6 April2011
Rounds E Mobility6 April2011Rounds E Mobility6 April2011
Rounds E Mobility6 April2011
 
arvinmeritor Morgan_Stanley_2007_ARM_Final
arvinmeritor Morgan_Stanley_2007_ARM_Finalarvinmeritor Morgan_Stanley_2007_ARM_Final
arvinmeritor Morgan_Stanley_2007_ARM_Final
 
Azure Transit Connect BEV & Balance Hybrids
Azure Transit Connect BEV & Balance HybridsAzure Transit Connect BEV & Balance Hybrids
Azure Transit Connect BEV & Balance Hybrids
 
LEAR 2004 jpmorgan
 LEAR  2004 jpmorgan LEAR  2004 jpmorgan
LEAR 2004 jpmorgan
 
2011 Ford Mustang; Waldorf, MD
2011 Ford Mustang; Waldorf, MD2011 Ford Mustang; Waldorf, MD
2011 Ford Mustang; Waldorf, MD
 
11 Ford Mustang brought to you by your Mid Atlantic Ford Dealer
11 Ford Mustang brought to you by your Mid Atlantic Ford Dealer11 Ford Mustang brought to you by your Mid Atlantic Ford Dealer
11 Ford Mustang brought to you by your Mid Atlantic Ford Dealer
 

More from AutoAves

C Acar Buyer Bill Of Rights 07 26 05
C Acar Buyer Bill Of Rights 07 26 05C Acar Buyer Bill Of Rights 07 26 05
C Acar Buyer Bill Of Rights 07 26 05AutoAves
 
Truth In Blogging Think Customers The 1to1 Blog
Truth In Blogging   Think Customers  The 1to1 BlogTruth In Blogging   Think Customers  The 1to1 Blog
Truth In Blogging Think Customers The 1to1 BlogAutoAves
 
Internet Usage Importance Expands07 2007
Internet Usage Importance Expands07 2007Internet Usage Importance Expands07 2007
Internet Usage Importance Expands07 2007AutoAves
 
The Worlds Largest Focus Group
The Worlds Largest Focus GroupThe Worlds Largest Focus Group
The Worlds Largest Focus GroupAutoAves
 
Automotive Jobs Drive America
Automotive Jobs Drive AmericaAutomotive Jobs Drive America
Automotive Jobs Drive AmericaAutoAves
 
Edmunds Report To Automotive News
Edmunds Report To Automotive NewsEdmunds Report To Automotive News
Edmunds Report To Automotive NewsAutoAves
 
Rl Polk 2008 Consumer Expectations
Rl Polk 2008 Consumer ExpectationsRl Polk 2008 Consumer Expectations
Rl Polk 2008 Consumer ExpectationsAutoAves
 
The Impact Of Blogs On The Automotive Shopping Process
The Impact Of Blogs On The Automotive Shopping ProcessThe Impact Of Blogs On The Automotive Shopping Process
The Impact Of Blogs On The Automotive Shopping ProcessAutoAves
 
Google Research Informed Consumer
Google Research Informed ConsumerGoogle Research Informed Consumer
Google Research Informed ConsumerAutoAves
 
2008 Automotive Eshopper Study Final
2008 Automotive Eshopper Study Final2008 Automotive Eshopper Study Final
2008 Automotive Eshopper Study FinalAutoAves
 
Auto Aves Customer Testimonials!
Auto Aves Customer Testimonials!Auto Aves Customer Testimonials!
Auto Aves Customer Testimonials!AutoAves
 

More from AutoAves (20)

C Acar Buyer Bill Of Rights 07 26 05
C Acar Buyer Bill Of Rights 07 26 05C Acar Buyer Bill Of Rights 07 26 05
C Acar Buyer Bill Of Rights 07 26 05
 
Truth In Blogging Think Customers The 1to1 Blog
Truth In Blogging   Think Customers  The 1to1 BlogTruth In Blogging   Think Customers  The 1to1 Blog
Truth In Blogging Think Customers The 1to1 Blog
 
Internet Usage Importance Expands07 2007
Internet Usage Importance Expands07 2007Internet Usage Importance Expands07 2007
Internet Usage Importance Expands07 2007
 
The Worlds Largest Focus Group
The Worlds Largest Focus GroupThe Worlds Largest Focus Group
The Worlds Largest Focus Group
 
Automotive Jobs Drive America
Automotive Jobs Drive AmericaAutomotive Jobs Drive America
Automotive Jobs Drive America
 
Edmunds Report To Automotive News
Edmunds Report To Automotive NewsEdmunds Report To Automotive News
Edmunds Report To Automotive News
 
Rl Polk 2008 Consumer Expectations
Rl Polk 2008 Consumer ExpectationsRl Polk 2008 Consumer Expectations
Rl Polk 2008 Consumer Expectations
 
The Impact Of Blogs On The Automotive Shopping Process
The Impact Of Blogs On The Automotive Shopping ProcessThe Impact Of Blogs On The Automotive Shopping Process
The Impact Of Blogs On The Automotive Shopping Process
 
Google Research Informed Consumer
Google Research Informed ConsumerGoogle Research Informed Consumer
Google Research Informed Consumer
 
2008 Automotive Eshopper Study Final
2008 Automotive Eshopper Study Final2008 Automotive Eshopper Study Final
2008 Automotive Eshopper Study Final
 
Auto Aves Customer Testimonials!
Auto Aves Customer Testimonials!Auto Aves Customer Testimonials!
Auto Aves Customer Testimonials!
 
Swisher1
Swisher1Swisher1
Swisher1
 
T Brown1
T Brown1T Brown1
T Brown1
 
Sudmai~1
Sudmai~1Sudmai~1
Sudmai~1
 
Punch1
Punch1Punch1
Punch1
 
Ulmer1
Ulmer1Ulmer1
Ulmer1
 
Thomas1
Thomas1Thomas1
Thomas1
 
Seitz1
Seitz1Seitz1
Seitz1
 
Schaub~1
Schaub~1Schaub~1
Schaub~1
 
Schott1
Schott1Schott1
Schott1
 

Recently uploaded

PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptxPGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptxaleonardes
 
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docxJORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docxArturo Pacheco Alvarez
 
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWEProject & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWEDeShawn Ellis
 
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdfClash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdfMuhammad Hashim
 
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptxBenifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptxsherrymieg19
 
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptxBADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptxvillenoc6
 
Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024
Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024
Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024Judith Chuquipul
 
20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx
20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx
20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docxSharon Liu
 
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024DONAL88 GACOR
 

Recently uploaded (9)

PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptxPGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
 
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docxJORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
 
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWEProject & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
 
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdfClash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
 
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptxBenifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
 
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptxBADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
 
Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024
Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024
Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024
 
20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx
20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx
20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx
 
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
 

Jd Power Buick Jaguar Rank Highest Dependability03 2009

  • 1. J.D. Power and Associates Reports: Buick and Jaguar Tie to Rank Highest for Vehicle Dependability Toyota Motor Corporation Captures Ten Segment Awards; Ford Motor Company Garners Four WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif.: 19 March 2009 — Buick and Jaguar each rank highest in vehicle dependability in a tie, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM (VDS) released today. Buick improves from a sixth-place ranking in 2008, while Jaguar improves from 10th place. Following in the top five rankings this year are Lexus, Toyota and Mercury. Toyota garners five segment awards—more than any other nameplate in 2009—for the Highlander, Prius, Sequoia, Solara and Tundra. Lexus follows with four segment awards for the ES 330 (in a tie with the Acura RL), GX 470, LS 430 and SC 430. Lincoln captures two awards for the Mark LT and Zephyr. Models by Acura, Buick, Dodge, Ford, Honda, Mazda, Mercury, Nissan and Scion each rank highest in one segment. “Buick has ranked among the top 10 nameplates each year since the study was last redesigned in 2003, while Jaguar has moved rapidly up the rankings,” said David Sargent, vice president of automotive research at J.D. Power and Associates. “Lexus remains a very strong competitor in long-term quality. In particular, the Lexus LS 430 sets the industry standard for dependability, with fewer problems reported than any other model in the study.” The study, which measures problems experienced by original owners of three-year-old (2006 model year) vehicles, has been redesigned to include 202 different problem symptoms across all areas of the vehicle. Overall dependability is determined by the level of problems experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100), with a lower score reflecting higher quality. The study is used extensively by vehicle manufacturers worldwide to help design and build better vehicles—which typically retain higher resale values—and by consumers to help them make more- informed choices for both new and used vehicles. “In the current economic climate, consumers are delaying new-vehicle purchases and keeping their vehicles longer—the average age of a vehicle at trade-in has increased to 73 months in 2009 from 65 months in 2006,” said Sargent. “This makes vehicle dependability even more critical. Automakers have improved long-term dependability by an average of 10 percent each year since the inception of the study, which is a testament to the industry’s commitment to continuously improve and sustain quality, especially long-term quality. Making improvements in long-term quality not only satisfies customers who are holding onto their vehicles longer, but it will also influence their decisions when they return to the new-vehicle market or are seeking to purchase a pre- owned vehicle.” The study finds that the frequency and severity of component replacement has a particularly strong impact on customer loyalty intentions. Component areas for which the impact is greatest include engine and transmission. When engine components are replaced or rebuilt, just 11 percent of customers state that they definitely intend to purchase or lease another vehicle of the same make, compared with nearly 40 percent among owners who report replacing no components. (Page 1 of 2)
  • 2. The study also finds that Buick, Lincoln, Mercury and Jaguar owners are less likely to replace components than owners of other vehicle brands. While component replacement rates are similar for premium and non-premium makes, there are notable differences between vehicle segments. Owners of models in the premium sporty vehicle segment are least likely to replace components, while owners of models in the van segment are most likely to replace components. The 2009 Vehicle Dependability Study is based on responses from more than 46,000 original owners of 2006 model-year vehicles. The study was fielded in October 2008. Find more detailed findings on vehicle dependability as well as model photos and specs by reading an article and reviewing brand and segment dependability ratings at JDPower.com. About J.D. Power and Associates Headquartered in Westlake Village, Calif., J.D. Power and Associates is a global marketing information services company operating in key business sectors including market research, forecasting, performance improvement, Web intelligence and customer satisfaction. The company’s quality and satisfaction measurements are based on responses from millions of consumers annually. For more information on car reviews and ratings, car insurance, health insurance, cell phone ratings, and more, please visit JDPower.com. J.D. Power and Associates is a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies. About The McGraw-Hill Companies Founded in 1888, The McGraw-Hill Companies (NYSE: MHP) is a leading global information services provider meeting worldwide needs in the financial services, education and business information markets through leading brands such as Standard & Poor’s, McGraw-Hill Education, BusinessWeek and J.D. Power and Associates. The Corporation has more than 280 offices in 40 countries. Sales in 2008 were $6.4 billion. Additional information is available at http://www.mcgraw-hill.com. J.D. Power and Associates Media Relations Contacts: Karla Tucker; Troy, Mich.; (248) 312-4344; media.relations@jdpa.com Syvetril Perryman; Westlake Village, Calif.; (805) 418-8103; media.relations@jdpa.com No advertising or other promotional use can be made of the information in this release without the express prior written consent of J.D. Power and Associates. www.jdpower.com/corporate # # # (Page 2 of 2) NOTE: Three charts follow.
  • 3. J.D. Power and Associates SM 2009 Vehicle Dependability Study (VDS) 2009 Nameplate Ranking Problems per 100 Vehicles 0 100 200 300 400 Buick 122 Jaguar 122 Lexus 126 Toyota 129 Mercury 134 Infiniti 142 Acura 146 Lincoln 147 Cadillac 148 Honda 148 Porsche 150 Audi 159 Ford 159 Hyundai 161 Subaru 162 Chrysler 165 BMW 166 Industry Average 170 GMC 174 Mercedes-Benz 184 Chevrolet 185 Mitsubishi 185 Volvo 186 Nissan 199 Dodge 202 MINI 205 Saturn 211 Kia 218 Jeep 220 Pontiac 220 HUMMER 221 Scion 222 SAAB 226 Mazda 227 Isuzu 234 Land Rover 238 Volkswagen 260 Suzuki 263 Source: J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM Charts and graphs extracted from this press release must be accompanied by a statement identifying J.D. Power and Associates as the publisher and the J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM as the source. Rankings are based on numerical scores, and not necessarily on statistical significance. No advertising or other promotional use can be made of the information in this release or J.D. Power and Associates study results without the express prior written consent of J.D. Power and Associates.
  • 4. J.D. Power and Associates SM 2009 Vehicle Dependability Study (VDS) Top Three Models per Segment Car Segments Sub-Compact Car Compact Premium Sporty Car Highest Ranked: Scion xA Highest Ranked: Nissan 350Z Suzuki Aerio Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Chevrolet Aveo Acura RSX Compact Car Entry Premium Vehicle Highest Ranked: Toyota Prius Highest Ranked: Lincoln Zephyr Toyota Matrix Cadillac CTS Pontiac Vibe Infiniti G-Series Compact Sporty Car Midsize Premium Car Highest Ranked: Mazda MX-5 Miata Highest Ranked: Acura RL (tie) Subaru Impreza Lexus ES 330 (tie) Pontiac Solstice Convertible Infiniti M-Series Midsize Sporty Car Large Premium Car Highest Ranked: Toyota Solara Highest Ranked: Lexus LS 430 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Lincoln Town Car Ford Mustang Cadillac DTS Midsize Car Premium Sporty Car Highest Ranked: Buick LaCrosse Highest Ranked: Lexus SC 430 Toyota Camry Porsche 911 Mercury Milan Chevrolet Corvette Large Car Highest Ranked: Mercury Grand Marquis Buick Lucerne Mercury Montego For more detailed findings on vehicle quality and dependability performance, visit www.jdpower.com Source: J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM Charts and graphs extracted from this press release must be accompanied by a statement identifying J.D. Power and Associates as the publisher and the J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM as the source. Rankings are based on numerical scores, and not necessarily on statistical significance. No advertising or other promotional use can be made of the information in this release or J.D. Power and Associates study results without the express prior written consent of J.D. Power and Associates.
  • 5. J.D. Power and Associates SM 2009 Vehicle Dependability Study (VDS) Top Three Models per Segment Truck / Multi-Activity Vehicle (MAV) Segments Compact MAV Midsize Pickup Highest Ranked: Honda Element Highest Ranked: Ford Ranger Honda CR-V Honda Ridgeline Mitsubishi Outlander Toyota Tacoma Midsize MAV Van Highest Ranked: Toyota Highlander Highest Ranked: Dodge Caravan Toyota 4Runner Ford Freestar Buick Rainier Toyota Sienna Large MAV Midsize Premium MAV Highest Ranked: Toyota Sequoia Highest Ranked: Lexus GX 470 Chevrolet Tahoe Acura MDX Ford Expedition Lexus RX 330/RX400h Large Pickup Large Premium MAV Highest Ranked: Toyota Tundra Highest Ranked: Lincoln Mark LT Ford F-150 LD Land Rover Range Rover Sport GMC Sierra LD Lincoln Navigator For more detailed findings on vehicle quality and dependability performance, visit www.jdpower.com Source: J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM Charts and graphs extracted from this press release must be accompanied by a statement identifying J.D. Power and Associates as the publisher and the J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Vehicle Dependability StudySM as the source. Rankings are based on numerical scores, and not necessarily on statistical significance. No advertising or other promotional use can be made of the information in this release or J.D. Power and Associates study results without the express prior written consent of J.D. Power and Associates.