Results, conclusions and recommendations from the Value Selling Survey 2015 - Research conducted in Germany, Switzerland, Benelux by Mercuri International and St Gallen University , based on survey of 278 B2B Companies.
2. Value Selling 2.0
Results ,
conclusions
and recommendations
from the Value Selling Survey 2015
Mercuri International
Holger Dannenberg,
Managing Director Mercuri International Germany
Christian Belz,
Prof. Dr., Professor of Management, University of St Gallen, Switzerland
Allard Claessens,
Senior Consultant, Mercuri International Benelux
In total 278 b2b companies from D/CH and Benelux participated in the survey.
There we no serious differences in the result between the countries.
44% of the repondends are MDs or Division Managers, 38% Sales-, Key Account- or Customer Managers.
73% stated that the survey covers all relevant aspects of Value Selling.
65% produced components, parts, systems or machinery, 35% are from the service industry, more than 50% have complex products
A lot of companies in the sample are more successful than their industry average, 42% in profitability and 39% in growth.
Just say the figures.
Although VS seem to be well known there is a lot of room for improvement.
Before we go into more details let’s have a look at the structure of the survey.
The structure of the survey is based on a general approach to define an individual VS-Strategy
First we have to define what are the targets of value selling. What do we want to achieve?
Next step is to define the specific approach we want to choose and what benefits/values we want to make tangible.
Of course this needs changes in customer interaction. If we continue working in the same way nothing will change.
We also have to be prepared to overcome some hurdles. Within our sales team and within the customer and we have to adapt our way of sales management until we can realize success.
Of course this survey will not give us an individual solution but show us the status and experiences of other companies for each step in the process and can be used as a guideline to challenge your value selling process.
VS is important for many targets companies usually follow.
This shows again our statement from the beginning that it is an overall philosophy but not one specific approach.
The differentiation lies in the specific VS-approach you will have to use to achieve these targets.
If we look at possible VS-approaches –
by the way a value selling approach still only describes the changes you want to achieve and not the details hoe to do it –
we can see that there are 10 “core” approaches which more than 50% of the respondents want to follow in future and rate them with a high impact.
The only thing we wonder is the low rating of “from buyer to buying centre”
And - what is also interesting - obviously the respondents want to follow different approaches simultaneously.
There are interfaces and different strategies have to be bundled.
But be careful. Don’t be too ambitious or to vague.
Finally Value selling/VS-approaches have to deliver benefits to the customers which should be perceived by them as “Value”.
Again we see the same picture. A lot of values are seen as important for the customer.
To realize VS we again have to focus, to link the values to our chosen VS approach and finds a way to make them tangible.
It is not enough that we believe we can deliver them.
Sales play of course an import role in this. Sales must also be able to get them across. Benefits/Value have to be “translated” in sales activities and argumentation.
And this is our next topic. The bottleneck of sales
Finally Value selling/VS-approaches have to deliver benefits to the customers which should be perceived by them as “Value”.
Again we see the same picture. A lot of values are seen as important for the customer.
To realize VS we again have to focus, to link the values to our chosen VS approach and finds a way to make them tangible.
It is not enough that we believe we can deliver them.
Sales play of course an import role in this. Sales must also be able to get them across. Benefits/Value have to be “translated” in sales activities and argumentation.
And this is our next topic. The bottleneck of sales
In a lot of cases sales is the bottle neck for Value Selling.
Time for customer talks is limited.
Especially when we look at the topic – How will customer interaction change?
A lot of changes in customer interaction are necessary when we want to realize VS.
Most important are the usage of information, customer consulting and related argumentation.
It’s quite obvious that a lot of sales force will have to struggle to fulfil these demands and a lot of training will be needed.
Surprising is the low rating and importance of C-Level contacts. From our experience it is one of main changes when we want to realize VS concepts.
We think it is underestimated and one of the main activities to realize VS.