2. Lecture Outline
Federal Regulatory Framework
Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
Migratory Bird Treaty Act
State Regulatory Framework
California Endangered Species Act
California Native Plant Society
Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
Streambed Alteration Agreements (CDFW Code Section
1600)
Local Regulatory Framework (Generally)
Review of Methodology
Review CEQA Checklist Questions
3. Federal Endangered Species Act
Administered by United
States Fish and Wildlife
Service and National
Marine Fisheries Service
Outlines Process for listing
Species
Endangered
Threatened
Proposed
Methods for listing species
Examples: Gray Wolf in the
Northern Rockies; VELB;
Bald Eagle
4. Federal Endangered Species Act
Section 9 – Prohibits “Take”
Take means “harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill,
trap, capture, or collect, or attempt to engage in such conduct
This includes disturbance to habitats used by a species during
any portion of its life history
Under ESA, USFWS may authorize “take”, however activities
authorized by permits may differ depending on whether
species is listed as endangered or threatened
Endangered Species – Permits for scientific research; enhancement
of propagation or survival; taking that is incidental to otherwise
lawful activity
Threatened Species – Permits issued for zoological, horticultural, or
botanical exhibition; educational use; special purposes consistent
with ESA
Individuals Registered with USFWS may obtain captive-bred
wildlife permits to buy and sell within US non-native endangered or
threatened animals (Separate permit to import or export such
species and can’t keep as pet)
5. Section 404 of the CWA
Administered by US Army
Corps of Engineers
Regulates discharge of dredge
and fill material into “Waters
of the United States”
Nationwide Permit – Authorize
a number of activities in
Waters of US if activity can
demonstrate compliance with
standard conditions
Individual Permit - Area
excess of 0.5 acre of waters
Both require NO impacts to
endangered species
US Fish and Wildlife Service
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Association
(NOAA) Fisheries
6. Note: Waters of the United States
Waters or tributaries to lakes, rivers, intermittent
and perennial streams, mudflats, sand-flats,
natural ponds, wetlands, wet meadows, and
other aquatic habitats
Ordinary High Water Mark
Wetlands - South Pacific Division’s Guidelines for
Jurisdictional Delineations for Waters of the US
Require Three Conditions:
Hydrophytic Vegetation
Hydric Soils
Wetland Hydrology
All waters must show connectivity to a “Navigable
Water” to be jurisdictional (i.e. “Significant
Nexus” from 2006 Rapanos decision)
7. Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918)
Protects all common wild
birds found in the US
Exceptions:
House sparrow, starling, feral
pigeon
Resident game birds
(managed separately by
state)
Pheasant
Grouse
Quail
Wild Turkey
Unlawful for anyone to kill,
capture, possess, buy, sell,
trade, ship, import, or export
any migratory bird including
feathers, parts, nests, or eggs
8. CA Endangered Species Act
Analogous to Federal ESA
CDFW Administers
California ESA
Endangered Species
Threatened Species
Rare Species (plants)
Species of Concern
(informal) – no legal
protection, but recognized
as sensitive by CDFW
Endangered and
Threatened protected from
take
9. California Native Plant Society
CA Resource Conservation
Organization that has
inventoried Sensitive Plant
Species
Summarizes information on
distribution, rarity, and
endangerment of CA vascular
plants
Provides inventory of plant
communities considered
sensitive by State, Federal,
Academic Institutions, various
Conservation Groups
Bases sensitivity
determination on:
Number
Size of remaining occurrences
Recognized Threats
10. Porter-Cologne Water Quality
Control Act
Enacted in 1969, the Act designated the
State Water Resources Control Board with
the ultimate authority over state water
rights and water policy
Also designated Regional Boards for day-
to-day quality on a regional level
Administer Basin Plans
NPDES Permits (Point Sources – i.e. “pipes”)
CWA 401 Certification
Wetland and Riparian Area Protection Policy
(NEW)
11. Section 401 of CWA
Administered by State Water Resources
Control Board
“[A]ny applicant for a Federal permit for
activities that involve a discharge to
waters of the State, shall provide the
Federal permitting agency a certification
from the State in which the discharge is
proposed that states the discharge will
comply with the applicable provisions
under the Federal Clean Water Act.”
12. Streambed Alteration Agreements
Outlined in CDFW Code Section 1600-1603
“[I]t is unlawful for any person to substantially divert or
obstruct the natural flow or substantially change the bed,
channel, or bank of any river, stream, or lake designated
by the department, or use any material from the
streambeds, without first notifying the department of such
activity.”
CDFW Jurisdiction
Ephemeral, Intermittent, Perennial watercourses
Dry washes (NO NEED FOR OHWM!)
Characterized by hydrophitic vegetation, definable bed and
banks, presence of fish and wildlife resources
Does NOT include isolated wetlands
Also includes adjacent habitat
Oak woodlands in canyon bottoms
Willow woodlands that function as part of riparian system
13. Local Ordinances (Generally)
Tree Ordinances
Regulate Removal of certain native trees
Examples: Oaks, Black Walnut, Madrone, Redwood,
California Bay
Typically identify “Protected Trees” as being a certain
diameter
Identify compensatory mitigation and/or replacement
ratios
Swainson’s Hawk
Regulates Nesting and Foraging Habitat
Identifies compensatory mitigation and/or replacement
ratios
Riparian Setbacks
Defines building and development setbacks from
riparian systems
14. Local Ordinances (Generally)
Habitat Conservation Plans
Section 10 of ESA
Plan prepared under ESA by nonfederal parties to obtain
permits for incidental taking of threatened and endangered
species
Plan must specify:
Impacts to species that will occur
Steps taken to minimize and mitigate the incidental take
Funding available
Alternative actions considered, but not taken
Other necessary appropriate measures
After review of proposed conservation plan, USFWS/NOAA
and/or CDFW issue incidental take permits, provided a
determination is made that incidental taking “will not
appreciably reduce the likelihood of the survival and recovery
of the species in the wild”
15. Methodology
Literature Review
Topographic Quadrangle/Aerial Maps
Soil Surveys
CDFW California Wildlife Habitat Relationship System
California Natural Diversity Database
California Native Plant Society
Existing Habitat Conservation Plans
Site Visit
Note time, climate conditions
Characterize wildlife and plant species onsite
Species specific requirements
16. Sources of Information
California Natural Diversity Data Base
Department of Fish and Game (CDFW)
The California Native Plant Society's
Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of
California
CDFW's list of special animals and plants
California Statewide Wildlife Habitat
Relationships System
17. Sample Species Specific Guidance
Burrowing Owls
Survey Protocol and Guidance
Blunt Nose Leopard Lizard
Swainson Hawks
Staff Report and Guidance
California Red-Legged Frog
San Joaquin Kit Fox
19. Mitigating Biological Resources
Species and/or Habitat Specific
Often Regional Based
Mitigation Fees and Funds
Mitigation Banks
Pre Approved
Allows for larger conservation areas
Not always 1:1 ratio
Success Rates
Transfer
Type Convergence
Permitting Agencies
Section 10
Section 7
24. Significant Biological Impacts
What are a few types of projects?
Mining/Petroleum Extraction
Transportation Projects
Residential and Commercial Development
Large Industrial/Residential Developments
Wind Power
Solar Power
Many, many more.
History Near-extincition of the bison, whooping crane, and disappearance of the passenger pigeon helped drive the call for wildlife conservation starting in the 1900s; public introduced to a new concept: extinction. Several iterations were passed between the 1900s and 1960s, however in the 1970s, Nixon declared current conservation efforts inadequate; congress responded with a completely re-written law that was put together by a team of lawyers and scientists. Designed to protect species and the ecosystems upon which they end. Has been likened to the Magna Carta of the environmental movement The ESA defines as “endangered” any plant or animal species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its known geographic range. A “threatened” species is a species that is likely to become endangered. A “proposed” species is one that has been officially proposed by the USFWS for addition to the federal threatened and endangered species list. To list: Conduct assessments to identify species most in need of the ESA’s protection and the activities that threaten them; and Work through partnerships to conserve species by imiproving habitat and removing threats Species Assessments Emphasizes coordination with States to obtain the best available information on species status and recommendations for conservation; and Provides the foundation for planning and implementing voluntary conservation efforts that are most likely to be effective in improving the status of the species EXAMPLE: Thousands of gray wolves once ranged throughout the Northern Rockies, but were aggressively eliminated by the 1930s. Due to its listing in the ESA and the work of a variety of interest groups, the Northwest Montana Recovery Area supported 326 wolves and 21 breeding pairs. In May 2011, the Service published a direct final rule delisting wolves in Idaho, Montana, and parts of Oregon, Washington, and Utah. EXAMPLE: VELB EXAMPLE: Bald Eagles - Forty years ago, our national symbol was in danger of extinction throughout most of its range. Habitat destruction and degradation, illegal shooting, and the contamination of its food source, largely as a consequence of DDT, decimated the eagle population. Habitat protection afforded by the Endangered Species Act, the federal government’s banning of DDT, and conservation actions taken by the American public have helped Bald Eagles make a remarkable recovery. Bald Eagles were removed from the endangered species list in August 2007 because their populations recovered sufficiently.
Following years of development, in the 1960s, the public was recognizing the dangers of ignoring its water supplies: Pollution in Chesapeake Bay was found to cause $3 million in losses to the fishing industry DDT was prevalant in water supplies Bacteria levels in the Hudson River were at 170 times the safe limit In 1969, a floating oil slick on the Cuyahoga River near Cleaveland, Ohio burst into flames In 1972, CWA was a response to the nearly unchecked dumping of pollution into waterways. At the time, two-thirds of the country’s lakes, rivers, and coastal waters had become unsafe for fishing or swimming. Untreated sewage was being dumped into open water. The USACE administers Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA). This section regulates the discharge of dredge and fill material into waters of the U.S. USACE has established a series of nationwide permits that authorize certain activities in waters of the U.S., if a proposed activity can demonstrate compliance with standard conditions. Normally, USACE requires an individual permit for an activity that will affect an area equal to or in excess of 0.5 acre of waters of the U.S. Projects that result in impacts to less than 0.5 acre can normally be conducted pursuant to one of the nationwide permits, if consistent with the standard permit conditions. USACE also has discretionary authority to require an Environmental Impact Statement for projects that result in impacts to an area between 0.1 and 0.5 acre. Use of any nationwide permit is contingent on the activities having no impacts to endangered species. Example Nationwide Permits (50 of them): Maintenance Outfall Structures/Intake Structures Utility Lines Bank Stabilization Transportation Projects Mining Activities Tons more!
The Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 ( MBTA ), codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 703 – 712 (although §709 is omitted), is a United States federal law , at first enacted in 1916 in order to implement the convention for the protection of migratory birds between the United States and Great Britain (acting on behalf of Canada [1] ). The statute makes it unlawful to pursue, hunt, take, capture, kill or sell birds listed therein ("migratory birds"). The statute does not discriminate between live or dead birds and also grants full protection to any bird parts including feathers, eggs and nests. Over 800 species are currently on the list. Narrow exceptions to the act, known as the eagle feather law , are enacted in federal regulations (50 C.F.R. 22), which regulates the taking, possession, and transportation of bald eagles , golden eagles , and their "parts, nests, and eggs" for "scientific, educational, and depredation control purposes; for the religious purposes of American Indian tribes; and to protect other interests in a particular locality." Enrolled members of federally recognized tribes may apply for an eagle permit for use in " bona fide tribal religious ceremonies." [2] The Act was enacted in an era when many bird species were threatened by the commercial trade in birds and bird feathers . The Act was one of the first federal environmental laws (the Lacey Act had been enacted in 1900). The Act replaced the earlier Weeks-McLean Act (1913). Since 1918, similar conventions between the United States and four other nations have been made and incorporated into the MBTA: Mexico (1936), Japan (1972) and the Soviet Union (1976, now its successor state Russia ). Some of these conventions stipulate protections not only for the birds themselves, but also for habitats and environs necessary for the birds' survival.
Implemented in 1984 to remedy previous conservation efforts. Generally, it mirrors FESA and is administered by CDFW The California Endangered Species Act (CESA) generally parallels the main provisions of the FESA, but unlike its federal counterpart, the CESA applies the take prohibitions to species proposed for listing (called candidates by the State). Section 2080 of the CDFW Code prohibits the taking, possession, purchase, sale, and import or export of endangered, threatened, or candidate species, unless otherwise authorized by permit or in the regulations. Take is defined in Section 86 of the CDFW Code as to “hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill.” The CESA allows for take incidental to otherwise lawful development projects. State lead agencies are required to consult with the CDFW to ensure that any action they undertake is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered, threatened, or candidate species or result in destruction or adverse modification of essential habitat. The CDFW administers the act and authorizes take through Section 2081 agreements (except for designated fully protected species). The State of California considers an “endangered” species one whose prospects of survival and reproduction are in immediate jeopardy. A “threatened” species is one present in such small numbers throughout its range that it is likely to become an endangered species in the near future in the absence of special protection or management. A “rare” species is one present in such small numbers throughout its portion of its known geographic range that it may become endangered if its present environment worsens.
The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) is a California resource conservation organization that has developed and inventory of California’s sensitive plant species. This inventory summarizes information on the distribution, rarity, and endangerment of California’s vascular plants. The inventory is divided into four lists based on the rarity of the species. In addition, the CNPS provides an inventory of plant communities that are considered sensitive by the state and federal resource agencies, academic institutions, and various conservation groups. Determination of the level of sensitivity is based on the number and size of remaining occurrences as well as recognized threats.
The RWQCB regulates actions that would involve “discharging waste, or proposing to discharge waste, within any region that could affect the water of the state” (Water Code Section 13260(a)), pursuant to provisions of the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act. “Waters of the State” are defined as “any surface water or groundwater, including saline waters, within the boundaries of the state” (Water Code Section 13050(e)). Each Basin Plan establishes: 1) beneficial uses of water designated for each water body to be protected; 2) water quality standards, known as water quality objectives, for both surface water and groundwater; and 3) actions necessary to maintain these standards in order to control non-point and point sources of pollution to the State's waters. Regional Boards regulate all pollutant or nuisance discharges that may affect either surface water or groundwater. Any person proposing to discharge waste within any region must file a report of waste discharge with the appropriate regional board. No discharge may take place until: 1) the Regional Board issues waste discharge requirements or a waiver of the waste discharge requirements, and 2) 120 days have passed since complying with reporting requirements. Under the auspices of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the State Board and nine Regional Boards also have the responsibility of granting Clean Water Act National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits, commonly known as NPDES permits, for certain point-source discharges. In summary, California routinely issues NPDES permits to selected point-source dischargers and either waste discharge requirements or conditioned water quality certification for other discharges. The nine Regional Boards differ somewhat in the extent they choose to apply waste discharge requirements and other regulatory actions. Project proponents should be careful to check with the appropriate Regional Board before proceeding with any action which may result in a discharge to State waters. Wetland and Riparian Area Protection Policy As directed by the State Water Board in Resolution No. 2008-0026 , the Wetland and Riparian Area Protection Policy is being implemented in three phases which will allow for necessary infrastructure and program development. The current Phase 1 effort is now called the “Wetland Area Protection and Dredge and Fill Permitting Policy.” The purpose of Phase 1 is to protect all waters of the State, including wetlands, from dredge and fill discharges. It includes a wetland definition and associated delineation methods, an assessment framework for collecting and reporting aquatic resource information, and requirements applicable to discharges of dredged or fill material. Phases 2 and 3 are not under consideration at this time. Current efforts on Phase 1 are focused on developing a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report and accompanying draft policy and draft regulation text.
Under federal Clean Water Act (CWA) section 401 every applicant for a federal permit or license for any activity which may result in a discharge to a water body must obtain State Water Quality Certification (Certification) that the proposed activity will comply with state water quality standards. Most Certifications are issued in connection with U.S. Army Corps of Engineer (Corps) CWA section 404 permits for dredge and fill discharges. Once a complete application has been received, the State Board and regional boards have a federal agency-dependent time period to issue or deny 401 Water Quality Certification, or to request that the federal agency provide additional time for review. For the Corps [U.S. Army Corps of Engineers], the regional boards and State Board have 60 days to issue or deny 401 Water Quality Certification, or to request from the Corps a time extension of up to one year. If the State Board or regional boards fail to take any action within the specific time period, the federal agency can assume that 401 Water Quality Certification has been waived by the state, and the federal agency can proceed through the rest of its permitting process. The current regulations do not allow the State Board or regional boards to “waive” through inaction; and therefore, some action (deny, issue, request additional time) must be taken within the specified time period. Once again for the Corps, the time period is 60 days upon receipt of a complete 401 Water Quality Certification application.