1. The document discusses the challenges and opportunities of enabling public access to publicly funded research, including papers, data, and research processes. 2. It notes that while making papers openly accessible through author manuscript deposit or open access journals has made progress, sharing full data and detailed methodological descriptions remains much more difficult. 3. The document argues that as a major public funder of research, STFC should lead the effort to establish international standards and infrastructure for open sharing of all research outputs and processes in order to maximize the return on public investment in science.

2. Pedro Beltrao Richard Grant Mat Todd
Branwen Hide Plausible Accuracy
John
Dupuis Neil Saunders Steve Wilson Simon Rich Apodaca Noel
Coles
Tony Hey Pawel Szcsesny Gorelick
Richard Akerman Dave de Roure
Gabriel CavalliStephen Brenner
Jon Tim O’Reilly Victoria Stodden Jeremy Frey
ISIS LSS Group
Udell Jean-Claude Bradley
Jeremiah Faith Martyn Bull
Michael Barton
John Cumbers
Clay Shirky
David Crotty Helen
Bora Egon Willighagen
Zivkovic Brian Kelly Tony WilliamsTim O’Reilly Berman
Maxine Clarke
Frank Mitch Michael Nielsen Andrew Milsted
Martin Fenner
Jenny Rohn
Greg Wilson
Norman Waldrop
Yaroslav Nikolaev Iain Emsley Rafael Sidi Bill Lee Smolin
Lorie LeJeune JonathanHooker
Timo Hannay
Gray
Ken ShanklandRicardo Vidal Paulo Nuin
Deepak Singh Shirley Wu Liz Lyons PLoS
STFC
Peter Binfield Benjamin Good Dorothea Salo
Friendfeed
Jen Dodd John Cumbers Peter Murray-Rust Richard Akerman
Chad Orzel Jon Eisen Jenny HaleLakshmi Shastry Computing Group
ISIS
SciFoo 2008 Flanagan
Bill Matt Wood
Jon Tansley Michael Eisen
Victor HenningGoogle Björn Brembs
campers
Rufus Pollock Tim Hubbard
John
Gavin Bell
Andy Powell Harry Collins
Wilbanks
Garret LisiJamie McQuay
Mike Ellis Duncan Hull
Catherine Jones
Euan Adie Peter Suber
Gavin Baker
The BioGang
Sabine Hossenfelder
Paul Walk
Flickr Kevin Kelly
Kaitlin ThaneyRichard Curry Atilla Csordas Ian Mulvaney

3. Open Access, Open Data.
Open Research?
The challenges and opportunities of enabling
public access to publicly funded research

4. Public access to publicly funded research

5. Public access to publicly funded research

6. Public access to publicly funded research
ther
es o s
clu d her
In
arc
rese

7. ople
e pe h
clu d
y in like muc
Ma
don’t
we
Public access to publicly funded research
ther
es o s
clu d her
In
arc
rese

8. ople
e pe h
clu d
y in like muc
Ma
don’t
we
Public access to publicly funded research
ther
es o s
clu d her
In
arc
rese
Inclu des m
e!

9. How
much
acces
an d t s
o wha
t?
Public access to publicly funded research
nities
portu ic
Op ubl
for p ent
agem
eng

10. Go ve
rnme
nt an
chari d
ty fu
n ders
Public access to publicly funded research
Why do peo ple fun d
research anyway?

11. cial
e, so ths
ienc , ma
Sc
, law ...
ence mics
sci
cono
e
Public access to publicly funded research

14. Author copy
From work... deposited
Subscription
Subscription
OA journal
Subscription
OA journal

15. Author copy
From home... deposited
OA journal
OA journal

16. Does it really matter?

17. “...I worked at a 300-person nonprofit research
institute with a small library. So there I was—a
scientist and a taxpayer—desperate to read the
results of work that I helped pay for...And yet either
I could not get the papers or I had to pay to read
them without knowing if they would be helpful...”
Eisen JA (2008) PLoS Biology 2.0. PLoS Biol 6(2): e48

18. http://reddit.com/top 10:46 GMT 27/1/09

19. Author copy
deposited
Subscription
Subscription
OA journal
Subscription
OA journal

20. Open Access Publishers
http://biology.plosjournals.org
http://www.biomedcentral.com

21. Author copy
deposited
Subscription
Subscription
OA journal
Subscription
OA journal

23. Why go to trouble of depositing?

24. SEC. 218. The Director of the National Institutes of Health
shall require that all investigators funded by the NIH
submit or have submitted for them to the National Library
of Medicine’s PubMed Central an electronic version of
their final peer-reviewed manuscripts upon acceptance for
publication, to be made publicly available no later than 12
months after the official date of publication: Provided,
That the NIH shall implement the public access policy in a
manner consistent with copyright law.
http://publicaccess.nih.gov/

25. UK funders with a publications policy

26. The Council reaffirms its long-standing view that authors choose
where to place their research for publication. Furthermore, the
Council now also strongly encourages researchers to deposit
research outputs resulting from use of Council facilities or grants
in appropriate open access repositories. Authors should at the
earliest opportunity:
• Personally deposit, or otherwise ensure the deposit of, a copy
of articles published in journals or conference proceedings in an
appropriate e-print repository.
• Wherever possible, personally deposit, or otherwise ensure the
deposit of, the bibliographical metadata relating to such articles,
including a link to the publisher's website, at or around the time
of publication.
http://www.stfc.ac.uk/Publications/sci/outputs.aspx

27. “Within two years it will be
unusual for a serious
research funder not to have
an Open Access policy”
John Wilbanks, Vice President, Science Commons
ESOF Satellite Workshop, July 2008

28. Papers are easy...
...it’s just money
http://flickr.com/photos/cudmore/4079784/ CC-BY-SA

29. Data is much,
much, harder...
...capturing annotation,
context, meaning...
http://flickr.com/photos/kubina/941699149/ CC-BY-SA

30. This is not very useful...

31. BBSRC expects research data generated as
a result of BBSRC support to be made
available...no later than the release through
publication...in-line with established best
practice in the field...data should also be
retained for a period of ten years after
completion of a research project...
...an application’s credibility will suffer if the
[data sharing]...statement is inappropriate
http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/publications/policy/data_sharing_policy.pdf

32. A paper = a claim (or claims)
The full record that supports that
claim should be available for
detailed examination and critique
“We argue in good faith from shared
evidence to shared conclusions”
Lee Smolin
http://flickr.com/photos/nicmcphee/2756494307/

33. Enough problems already!

34. “Communicate first,
standardise second.”
Jean-Claude Bradley, Drexel University

35. http://biolab.isis.rl.ac.uk/projects/blog/blogs.php/blog_id/5

36. http://biolab.isis.rl.ac.uk/projects/blog/blogs.php/blog_id/5

37. If you thought data was
hard, process is much worse

38. Capture it at source...
...in context
http://flickr.com/photos/jason_burmeister/2053139930/

39. ...rather than wait till here
http://flickr.com/photos/clairity/114084801/

40. But what’s in it for me?

41. http://tinyurl.com/friendfeed-mthk-request

42. http://chemtools.chem.soton.ac.uk/projects/blog/blogs.php/bit_id/7735

43. http://chemtools.chem.soton.ac.uk/projects/blog/blogs.php/bit_id/7735

44. A tender…
http://web2-in-science.wikidot.com/

45. A paper…
http://chemtools.chem.soton.ac.uk/wiki/index.php/Blog_-_PLoS_Bio

46. A grant proposal
http://docs.google.com/View?docID=dhs5x5kr_559gqg6x7&revision=_latest

47. What about some real science?

48. http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2007/03/18/why-global-regularity-for-navier-stokes-is-hard/

49. Comments from Greg
Kuperberg, Gil Kalai,
Nets Katz....
http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2007/03/18/why-global-regularity-for-navier-stokes-is-hard/

50. Measuring solubility

51. http://onschallenge.wikispaces.com/Exp026

52. http://tinyurl.com/ons-challenge-spreadsheet

53. http://oru.edu/cccda/sl/descriptorspace/ds.php

54. http://oru.edu/cccda/sl/descriptorspace/ds.php

56. http://slurl.com/secondlife/Drexel/165/178/24

57. 113 individual measurements
(plus 71 literature values)
14 researchers in four countries
One undergraduate chemistry class
$6000 funding (for prizes and chemicals)

58. 113 individual measurements
(plus 71 literature values)
14 researchers in four countries
One undergraduate chemistry class
$6000 funding (for prizes and chemicals)
Four months

59. Agile collaboration
The right person for each job

60. Agile collaboration
The right person for each job
Even if you don’t know who
that is yet

61. …efficiency...
...value for money...
...return on investment
http://flickr.com/photos/luismimunoznajar/2093185804/

62. STFC can follow...

63. ...or lead

64. Realistically, the current
mainstream response to these
ideas looks like…

65. http://flickr.com/photos/zanotti/314391903/

66. A B.H.A.G.
STFC as a world leader in making
research outputs available

67. 1. Put a high value on the data we fund
2. Require data sharing statements to help
raise awareness among users
3. Lead the building of an international
data and process sharing infrastructure
4. Support OA for in house publications
5. Set high standards of methodological
description for published in house research

68. Have a policy
Mean it
Coordinate with other
research funders

69. In the last five years...?
http://flickr.com/photos/stewart/461099066/

70. ...in the past 24 hours?

71. Research impact
=
Google PageRank

72. High PageRank
=
Wired into the network

73. =

74. Available

75. The best science
The best communication
With the best tools available