1. Translating Genomes | Personalizing Medicine
Using cell-based assays in the development of efficacious cancer therapies
Dr. Kyla Grimshaw
VP Research Operations
2. 2
Presenter
Kyla Grimshaw PhD
VP Research Operations
Kyla has been leading the oncology translational research service at Horizon
since co-founding the CRO arm of the company in 2007.
Prior to this, she worked on multiple drug discovery programmes at
Millennium Pharmaceuticals and Astex Pharmaceuticals.
Her core area of expertise is in oncology cell biology and providing expert
contract research to customers.
3. 3
Content of the Presentation
Introduction to Horizon Discovery
Horizon Discovery Research Division - Horizon’s services and collaboration platforms
Applying cell-based assays to address key questions in cancer drug discovery
• Use of isogenic cell lines
• Compound vs. genetic knockdown studies
• Tumour microenvironment
• Combination assays
New developments
Summary
6. Genome Editing: To create accurate genetic models
Isakoff et al., Cancer Research, Jan 2006 Di Nicolantonio et al., PNAS, Dec. 2008
6
Large growth induction phenotype
Transforming alone
Milder growth induction phenotype
Non-transforming alone
7. Genome Editing: To translate in vitro discoveries to patient treatments
All K-RAS mutant patients excluded from therapy with Erbitux® EGFR targeted agent
X-MAN™ lines predicted Erbitux® may work for a 20% sub-set of these patients with G13D,
7
new trials on-going
In vitro cell models In vivo xenograft models Patient clinical trials
8. Horizon Discovery Research Division: Horizon’s services and collaboration
platforms
8
Tool 1: X-MAN™ Cell Lines
• Patient stratification
• Target validation
• Pathway interrogation
Tool 2: Tumour Microenvironment
• 3D assays
• Co-culture
• Hypoxia, nutrient starvation
Tool 3: Screening Platforms
• siRNA
• shRNA
• sgRNA
Plus all functional assays typical of oncology drug discovery programmes
9. Horizon Discovery Research Division: Horizon’s services and collaboration
platforms
9
Tool 1: X-MAN Cell Lines
• Patient stratification
• Target validation
• Pathway interrogation
Tool 2: Tumour Microenvironment
• 3D assays
• Co-culture
• Hypoxia, nutrient starvation
Tool 3: Screening Platforms
• siRNA
• shRNA
• sgRNA
CombinatoRx platform
In vivo platform
Plus all functional assays typical of oncology drug discovery programmes
10. Key Questions: Cell-Based Assays in Cancer Drug and Target Discovery
Is the target well validated?
Which patients should I target?
Which patients should I avoid?
Is my assay configured correctly?
Impact of tumour microenvironment
What about combination therapy?
11. Target Validation: Use of Knock-down, Knock-out and Knock-in experiments
shRNA target knock-down in A549 cells sgRNA target knock-out in A549 cells
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
HCT116 WT HCT116
KO
0 6 12 18 24 30
11
Knock-out of gene, in vivo
Tumour Volume (mm3)
Time (days)
Knock-in of activity dead
mutation, in 3D
12. Target Validation: A new Target Essentiality Analysis
Infect cells targeting gene of interest
Cas9 nuclease activity will introduce
random double strand breaks into
each allele of the target cell line.
Culture colonies from single cells
Assess length of fluorescent PCR
products to check allele ratios and
frame shift occurrence in 100’s
colonies
TARGET ESSENTIAL
Colonies contain only in
frame indels
TARGET NON-ESSENTIAL
Colonies contain frame
shift indels
13. Cell-Based Assays in Cancer Drug and Target Discovery
Is the target well validated?
Which patients should I target?
Which patients should I avoid?
Is my assay configured correctly?
Impact of tumour microenvironment
What about combination therapy?
14. 14
Isogenic cell lines
Horizon has collection of over 550 isogenic cell line pairs X-MAN™ cell lines
Horizon’s expert targeting team can also engineer a genetically validated cell line to a
customer’s specification
16. Target identification using synthetic lethality screening and isogenic cell lines
Precisely control for target genotype and perfectly matched ‘normal’
Removes a key source of noise in synthetic lethality screens
16
siRNA target ID
Synthetic lethality waterfall plot (HCT116 isogenics)
Hits with selective death in the
mutant line
17. Cell-Based Assays in Cancer Drug and Target Discovery
Is the target well validated?
Which patients should I target?
Which patients should I avoid?
Is my assay configured correctly?
Impact of tumour microenvironment
What about combination therapy?
18. Resistance to a tyrosine kinase inhibitor is conferred by PTEN deletion or
activating mutations of PIK3CA in colon cancer cells
Cell viability
19. Cell-Based Assays in Cancer Drug and Target Discovery
Is the target well validated?
Which patients should I target?
Which patients should I avoid?
Is my assay configured correctly?
Impact of tumour microenvironment
What about combination therapy?
20. Effect of assay format on Olaparib response in DLD-1 colorectal cancer cells
96 h proliferation assay 10 day colony formation assay
21. Effect of oxygen levels on Tirapazamine response in HCT116 cells
3D spheroid
Pimonidazole staining of
spheroid cross-section
22. Cell-Based Assays in Cancer Drug and Target Discovery
Is the target well validated?
Which patients should I target?
Which patients should I avoid?
Is my assay configured correctly?
Impact of tumour microenvironment
What about combination therapy?
23. 3D conditions reveal a dependence on oncogenic KRAS in colon cancer cells
2D Adherent 3D Soft Agar
DLD-1 KRASG13D
DLD-1 KRASG13D KO
siRNA to KRAS in 3D
Response to MEK inhibitors in 2D vs. 3D
Log [M] ARRY162 (MEK inhibitor)
24. Cell-Based Assays in Cancer Drug and Target Discovery
Is the target well validated?
Which patients should I target?
Which patients should I avoid?
Is my assay configured correctly?
Impact of tumour microenvironment
What about combination therapy
25. High throughput cell-based drug combination assays
Diverse Mutational
Backgrounds
Compounds
Compounds
Function 1
Function 2
Function 3
Function 4
Function 5
Function 6
Function 7
Function 8
Function 9
Function 10
Function 11
Function 12
Function 13
Function 14
Function 15
Function 16
Function 17
Function 18
Function 19
Function 20
Function 21
Function 22
Function 23
Function 24
Function 25
Function 26
Function 1
Function 2
Function 3
Function 4
Function 5
Function 6
Function 7
Function 8
Function 9
Function 10
Function 11
Function 12
Function 13
Function 14
Function 15
Function 16
Function 17
Function 18
Function 19
Function 20
Function 21
Function 22
Function 23
Function 24
Function 25
Function 26
Over 800 cell lines
250 enhancer agents
Over a decade of experience in drug combination screening
Measured Activities Excess
26. Horizon Discovery: Integrated Solutions
Single agent
100-400 cancer cell lines
Combination study
100-400 cancer cell lines
100+ enhancers
HIT NOMINATION
Isogenic Cell Lines
Model generation
AAV/CRISPR/ZFN
PDX models
ex-vivo, in vivo
Highly characterised
26
Secondary assays
Microenvironment,
scheduling, higher order
combinations
MOA interrogation
siRNA/sgRNA/shRNA
Biomarkers assessment
Isogenic panels
Gene expression analysis
For MOA insights and PD
marker direction
In vivo KO models
Genetic engineering in
rat or mouse models
ZFN/CRISPR
Xenograft models
Standard mouse
xenografts
Bioinformatics Analysis
Response predictors,
clustering
Isogenic cell lines
Model generation,
screening in directed panels
27. Recent New Developments: New Assay Models
HaloTag® NanoLuc™
27
Endogenous reporter cell lines and kits
• X-MAN™ HaloTag® Reporter Kits
Knock-in of reporters/tag into endogenous locus for in vitro imaging / pull-downs /
purification
• X-MAN™ NanoLuc™ Reporter Kits
Knock-in of Luciferase reporter into endogenous locus for in vitro & in vivo pathway read-outs
TMR ligand DNA Stain
28. Recent New Developments: New Assay Models
28
PDX models
• 25 PDX models of breast cancer, characterised by whole genome
sequencing
• WGS has also been performed on the originating tumors, early and
late passages of PDX, as well as metastases, demonstrating striking
similarity and faithful modelling of the original tumor by WHIM PDX
models.
iPS organoids
• Currently under development
Maintenance of
undifferentiated iPS cells
Differentiation into
human endoderm
Differentiation into human mid/hind gut
Growing mid/hind gut
spheroids into human
intestinal organoids
29. Recent New Developments: Synthetic Lethal Target ID via sgRNA Screening
Webinar: RNA-based screening in drug discovery – introducing sgRNA technologies
Tue 9th Dec at 4 pm (GMT)
29
Shalem et al Science 2014
30. Repositioning
Patient
stratification
Working with Horizon Services Division
Target ID Target Validation H2L LO
Generation of isogenic cell lines MOA assays to support med chem
siRNA screens
sgRNA screens
TIDVAL alliances
KO to test
essentiality
Activity dead KI
mutations
Compound profiling in
isogenic cells
Compound profiling in large
Combination assays
cell line panels
Target validation & early stage drug discovery
collaborations
Finding a development path for
stranded clinical assets
In vivo models
30
Discovery Research
Services
Custom Cell Line
Development
CombinatoRx
Custom Screening
Services
In vivo models
31. Your Horizon Contact:
Dr. Kyla Grimshaw
VP Research Operations
k.grimshaw@horizondiscovery.com
+44 (0)1223 655580
Horizon Discovery Ltd, Building 7100, Cambridge Research Park, Waterbeach, Cambridge, CB25 9TL, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 1223 655 580 (Reception / Front desk) Fax: +44 (0) 1223 862 240 Email: info@horizondiscovery.com Web:
www.horizondiscovery.com
Notes de l'éditeur
Welcome and thank you for joining me today to talk about cell-based assays at Horizon Discovery.
In the webinar today I would like to introduce you to Horizon Discovery and describe our functional assays division
Focussing on how we use cell based assays to aid our customers and collaborators to perform first class oncology drug discovery.
Information is no longer a bottleneck, emphasis is shifting to the ‘what does it all mean’
Genome editing is enabling the promise of the genomic era to be realized in the form of novel therapeutics and diagnostics
It involves the capability to efficiently introduce targeted alterations into any specific gene in living cells
Horizon offers a range of products & services to support this discovery pipeline, from basic research through to validated therapeutic targets.
At Horizon, cell line models can be accessed by multiple routes to suit your requirements. Previously created isogenic cell lines can be accessed via our range of of-the-shelf cell lines, or else we can provide reagents and design advice via the GenAssist service through to a full custom cell line development project, generating your specific mutation in the cell line of your choice, performed by Horizons experienced scientists.
Target discovery and drug development services now include our high throughput CombinatoRx platform, and in vivo models at our Sage labs facility.
These services can be accessed individually or in as an integrated project to enable us to support projects of any size.
Horizon is founded on the use of genome editing, and this is fundamental to our philosophy supporting oncology drug discovery. And here’s why:
Historically, to understand the effect of a specific mutation, classic overexpression studies have been performed, in which a mutated gene of interest is introduced randomly into the cell under the control of an exogenous promoter. This can result in unclear results due to the non-physiological levels of expression and regulation. For example, on the slides we can see two studies investigating the effect of the same mutations. The first overexpresses PI3Kinase mutations and resulted in an oncogenic phenotype.
However, when these same mutations are introduced into the endogenous PI3K gene, where physiological levels of expression and endogenous mechanisms of regulation are retained, a much milder growth phenotype is observed which alone would not be considered as transforming. This more accurate modelling of the impact of specific mutations enables the multifactoral genotypes present if complex disease to be investigated with greater confidence.
Similar limitations can be seen with si and sh RNA studies which attempt to knock-down the expression of genes of interest. However these are rarely complete knockdowns and the residual expression cannot be discounted. Whereas permanent, stable disruption of a gene removes such confounding issues.
We have devised a medium-throughput method that can shed light on the ambiguous results that emerge from siRNA/shRNA or sgRNA screens
shRNA only gives partial knockdown; growth phenotypes often partial too
Repair of Cas9-mediated ds breaks can result in in-frame indels that don’t disrupt protein function
We would use lentiviruses to deliver Cas9 + sgRNA vs target to cells, allow 14-20 days for gene editing to occur and then culture colonies from single cells
Horizon’s cell-line engineering experience allows us to devise an analysis pipeline to characterise editing events on a clonal level
Three technical replicates per screen (CVs liquid handling <2.5%; CVs +/- controls ~ 13%)
Blue line is the median parental response plotted as a 2D waterfall
Green data points are the mutant response for the matching target gene
96h reveals some sensitivity to BRACS null lines. 10 day colony forming assay definitively demonstrates.
In a 2D cell culture assay tirapazamine requires exposure to low oxygen conditions for activation and to exert anti-proliferative effects.
Activity is seen in a 3D spheroid model which contains a hypoxic core
Cell line?
Finally, An exciting new area that is gaining a lot of interest at the moment are endogenous reporter lines. The same limitations that apply to over-expression studies apply to systems employigg synthetic reporter systems. In collaboration with Promega we have generated panels of cell lines that contain genes endogenously tagged with either the multi-purpose Halo-Tag or Nano Luc – an extremely bright reporter, over 150x as bright as standard firefly luciferase
using this technology, it is now possible to monitor the regulation of gene expression at the endogenous level and are sutiable for use in high-throughput formats.
And we are also investing in more complex disease models in the form of both PDX and organoids.
Though Sage labs we have developed 25 breast cancer PDX models. These are one of the most characterised sources of breast PDX models in the world, and are currently being established in our labs.
And we are also very interested to explore the possibilities of growing iPS organoids, both for screening and cell line engineering purposes .The data shown here is from our labs where we are at the exciting stage of sectioning fully formed organoids.
And if you would like to hear more about this exciting new area, please register for our sgRNA screening webinar n the 9th Dec.
Cancer is a genetic disease
Genome sequencing has generated 100’s of potential targets for cancer therapy
However, most targets are rare and poorly characterised
Most of them can’t be drugged directly e.g., tumour suppressors
If tumour suppressor loss is the prime cancer initiating event, agents exploiting this loss may assist with overcoming tumour heterogeneity
Systematic de-orphaning required to find key druggable downstream targets - exploiting co-dependence or synthetic lethality