1. Fortune Minerals Limited Investor Presentation
TSX-FT, OTC QX-FTMDF
May 2013
Emerging Metallurgical
Coal, Gold & Specialty
Metals Producer

2. 1
This document contains certain forward-looking information. This forward-looking information includes, or may be based upon,
estimates, forecasts, and statements as to management’s expectations with respect to, among other things, the size and quality of the
Company’s mineral resources, progress in development of mineral properties, timing and cost for placing the Company’s mineral
projects into production, costs of production, amount and quality of metal products recoverable from the Company’s mineral
resources, demand and market outlook for metals and coal and future metal and coal prices. Forward-looking information is based on
the opinions and estimates of management at the date the information is given, and is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties
and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information.
These factors include the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties, uncertainties with respect
to the receipt or timing of required permits and regulatory approvals, the uncertainties involved in interpreting drilling results and
other geological data, fluctuating metal and coal prices, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses,
uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, uncertainties related to metal recoveries and other
factors. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred mineral resources are
considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as
mineral reserves. There is no certainty that mineral resources will be converted into mineral reserves. Readers are cautioned to not
place undue reliance on forward-looking information because it is possible that predictions, forecasts, projections and other forms of
forward-looking information will not be achieved by the Company. The forward-looking information contained herein is made as of
the date hereof and the Company assumes no responsibility to update them or revise it to reflect new events or circumstances, except
as required by law.
Forward-Looking Information

3. 2
Financial Summary
Corporate Information Share Performance
OwnershipAnalyst Coverage
Dealer Date Rating Target
Killian Charles
Industrial Alliance Securities
Jan 29, 2013 Spec Buy $3.30
David Davidson
Paradigm Capital
Oct 16, 2012 Spec Buy $1.50
Michael Fowler
Loewen Ondaatje McCutcheon
Jan 29, 2013 Spec Buy $2.65
Russell Stanley
Haywood Securities
April 22, 2013 Sec Outperform $1.20
China Mining Resources Group Ltd. 13%
Manulife Asset Management 9%
Insiders 20%
Listings: TSX (Canada): FT
OTC QX (USA): FTMDF
Share Price $0.37
Shares Out – Basic 121.3
Shares Out – Fully Diluted 128.7
Market Cap – Basic $44.9
Working Capital (Q1 2013) $13.0
Total Assets (Q1 2013) $148.9
All amounts in M or CAD$M except per share amounts.
As of May 6, 2013
SharePrice(C$)
ShareVolume(M)
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
$0.00
$0.10
$0.20
$0.30
$0.40
$0.50
$0.60
$0.70
$0.80
May-12 Jul-12 Sep-12 Nov-12 Jan-13 Mar-13
Daily Volume
Closing Price

4. 3
Fortune Minerals Limited
Fortune Minerals Limited
 Canadian mineral development company
 Headquartered in London, Ontario, Canada
 Canada Focus - operating in mining friendly
jurisdictions
Two late-stage projects
 Arctos Anthracite Project, BC
(formerly Mount Klappan Anthracite Coal Project):
 Positive Feasibility Study
 Advancing towards production
 NICO Gold-Cobalt-Bismuth-Copper Project,
Northwest Territories & Saskatchewan:
 Positive Feasibility & FEED Studies
 Near completion of Environmental
Assessment & Permitting Process

5. 4
Introduction to Arctos Anthracite Project
(formerly the Mount Klappan Anthracite Metallurgical Coal Project)
Summary Highlights
 One of the world’s premier metallurgical coal development projects
 Advanced project with $100 million of work completed
 Updated Feasibility Study with robust economics, completed October 2012
 Railway development strategy to Port of Prince Rupert – allows for scalable expansion
 World-class JV partner secured with South Korean POSCO – one of the world’s largest steel producers
 Supply shortages of metallurgical coals with growing world consumption
 Environmental Assessment process with joint venture funding in place.

6. 5
Anthracite: Highest Quality Coal
Arctos is the largest & most advanced Canadian project of high rank anthracite coal
 Highest quality metallurgical coal with very high carbon & energy content
 Represents only 1% of world coal reserves
Metallurgical coal with diverse applications
 Metallurgical Reductants / charge carbon (US$250-300/t)
 Ultra-Low Vol. PCI (US$175)
 Sinter (US$150)
 Other products:
 Filter media (US$1000/t)
 Blend coal with coking coal for making metallurgical coke
 Direct coke replacement
 Urea fertilizers, synthetic fuels & plastics
 Heating & cooking briquettes
 Pelletizing
 Premium thermal coal
 Cement

7. 6
>500 million mt demand
increase over the next decade
with limited new production
potential
920
1,185
1,440
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
2010 2015 2020
Mt
Global Met Coal Demand
Significant Future Metallurgical Coal Demand Growth
Insufficient supply of metallurgical
coals to meet forecast global
demand
 Increasing demand for anthracite
due to new steel technologies &
lower emissions
 Emerging economies are driving
forces for future metallurgical coal
demand
 Steel production in China, India,
Brazil & other emerging
economies growing rapidly
 China’s GDP growth perspective
 10-14% growth was equivalent to
~$300B of GDP per year
 Current forecasted growth of 7-8%
is equivalent to ~$550B of GDP per
year
 Marginal cost of production
US$160-180/t
Source: Peabody Global Energy Analytics, Deloitte

8. 7
Growing Demand in Steel Industry
 Use of Pulverized Coal Injection (PCI) reduces
the amount of coke required in steel
production
 ~1/3 of the world’s blast furnaces use PCI
 Steelmakers around the world are expanding
PCI use to reduce costs
 Low-vol PCI typically priced at 70% to 80% of
high quality hard coking coal
 Arctos PCI will achieve a higher price given its
ultra-low volatile content
 Arctos coal also has diverse usage in other
metallurgical processes
 Sinter feed
 Can replace 15% - 30% of blast furnace
coke with anthracite
 New steel technologies
(Cokonyx/HiSmelt)
 Growth of electric arc steel
manufacturing
 Ferroalloys & other metal processingSource: Macarthur Coal

9. 8
Emergence of China as Net Coal Importer
Source: China Coal Resource Website, Bloomberg
China became a net coal importer of anthracite in 2004, coking coal in 2007, all coals in 2009
$47 $45
$58
$125
$115
$98
$300
$129
$215
$291
$209
-$150
-$100
-$50
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
-150
-50
50
150
250
350
450
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
HardCokingCoalPrice(US$/t)
NetImports(Mt)
Coal & Anthracite Net Imports by China
Coal Net Imports (Mt)
Anthracite Net Imports (Mt)
Hard Coking Coal Price (US$/t)

10. 9
Decreasing Supply of Anthracite
Supply constraints due to declining exports & lack of new supply
 China: 547 million tonnes – net importer since 2004
 Vietnam: 44.5 million tonnes – reducing exports to 5% of production by 2015 to utilize production
domestically
 Few new high-quality deposits in mining friendly jurisdictions
Source: Company research, corporate presentations, Wood Mackenzie & U.S. Energy Information Administration
*Production statistics from 2010 data. “Other” includes Spain, South Africa, South Korea, Germany, USA, and United Kingdom.
Export /
Production
0.8% 43.1% 13.2% 27.1% 48.5% 8.5%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
China Vietnam North Korea* Ukraine Russia Other
Mt
Supply of Anthracite - 2011
Production
Export
Production
Export
China Vietnam North Korea* Ukraine Russia

11. 1010
Strategic Location & Infrastructure
 16,411 Ha license area in northwest BC
 Close proximity to deep water shipping ports
 Stewart Port (150 km)
 Ridley Terminals in Prince Rupert (330 km)
 Mine site straddles railway right-of-way
 Track (CN) installed to 150 km south of mine
 Railway road bed largely complete to mine
 Road access from railway subgrade
 Support from CN Rail for railway extension
 BC Government extending electrical grid to area
 Project in Tahltan & Gitxsan Territories
 BC Government sharing revenues with Aboriginal groups
Railway sub-
grade links
mine site
with CN
mainline &
Ridley
Terminals

12. 1111
Joint Venture with POSCO
Secured world-class investor & strategic partner – one of the world’s largest steel producers
 POSCO Canada has acquired 20% interest in Arctos for anticipated initial payments & cash contributions of
$188 million based on current capital cost estimates
 $30 million paid to Fortune, $20 million contributed directly to the JV to advance permitting
 20% of total development & capital costs – $158 million under current estimates
 20% of operating costs for 20% of production in-kind for their own use
 Fortune is Project Manager & is compensated for providing support over life of mine
 Validates Arctos as one of world’s premier metallurgical coal development projects - key future supplier to
global steel industry
POSCO Gwanyang steel plant

13. 1212
Historical Arctos Global Resources (million tonnes) (1)
Lost Fox Metallurgical Coal Reserves and Resources (million tonnes) (2)
Area Measured Indicated M&I Inferred
Lost Fox 107.9 109.5 217.4 91.5
Hobbit-Broatch 13.5 13.5 258.4
Summit 9.6
Lost Fox Extension
Total 107.9 123.0 230.9 359.5
Coal Resources Run-of-Mine Coal Reserves 10% Ash Product Reserves
Measured Indicated Inferred Proven Probable Total Proven Probable
Total
Product
172.4 20.4 12.1 115.0 9.9 124.9 64.4 4.8 69.2
Resources & Reserves
 Recent upgrade & increase in resources & new reserves (October 15, 2012) – Small fraction of total resource
 Lost Fox deposit remains open for possible expansion & additional coal seams identified below 350 meters &
on adjacent lands
 Historical Resources include 2.2 billion tonnes in the Speculative class (1)
(1) The Arctos Mineral Resource & Mineral Reserve estimates were prepared in 2002, 2005, & 2007, respectively, by Marston & Marston Inc. in compliance with NI 43-101.Richard Marston, P.E.
is the Qualified Person responsible for the estimates. Historical Resources include 2.2 billion tonnes in the Speculative class. The historical resource estimate was developed by Gulf in 1988 and
updated in 2002 by Marston-Golder to reflect changes in the estimation of Inferred Resources under Paper GSC 88-21. The Speculative portion of the resources is not compliant with current
reporting standards. A qualified person has not done the work necessary to classify the historical estimate of Speculative resources as current mineral resources under NI 43-101 and the estimate
should not be relied upon. Speculative Resources were developed based on estimated average coal thickness applied to the projected aerial extent of the coal. Further information regarding the
Arctos Coal Resource & Reserve estimates is available from the Company’s disclosures under the Company’s profile on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com
(2) The 2012 DFS utilized updated Resource & Reserve estimates for the Lost Fox Deposit, which Edward Minnes, P.E. is the Qualified Person.

14. 13
Railway Partially Constructed
 Railway transportation allows for scalable expansion of production to take advantage of large resource base
 CN Rail operates between Prince George & Port of Prince Rupert & on Dease Lake Line to Minaret, 150 km
south of Arctos
 Railway road bed largely constructed to mine site by BC Government – brownfield extension from Minaret
 Survey & engineering of railway extension – $330.4 million capital cost included in 2012 DFS
 CN collaborating on railway extension to Arctos
Existing railway right-of-way & road bed

15. 1414
Rail Update – Moving Forward
 Canadian & BC Government engaged at very high levels
 Premier, Ministers & senior staff in BC Government
 COO of Transportation & Executive VP level at CN
 Collaborating with CN Rail for railway extension to site
 Negotiating optimal land tenure arrangement with the BC Government
 Likely public infrastructure under lease to CN with JV paying for maintenance & extension
 Advancing discussions for third party financial support
 Government recognizes they will either contribute financially or Arctos JV to get repaid from future third
party users
 Consultants engaged & advancing work
 Stantec & DPRA conducting environmental work & aboriginal engagement
 Fleishman-Hillard retained for government engagement
 Engineering company to be selected to prepare detailed rail engineering study
 CN conducting engineering for railway upgrade from Fort St. James to Minaret

16. 15
Port with Capesize Capacity
Ridley Coal Terminal a world-class coal & bulk materials handling facility
 Ice-free, deep water port 30 hours closer to Asia than Port of Vancouver
 Capable of handling full Capesize vessels up to 250,000 dwt that reduces ocean freight
 16 Mtpa design capacity
 Expansion to 25 Mtpa in progress – permitting a future expansion up to 60 Mtpa
 Opportunities for shared cargos & blending of coals with other metallurgical coal producers

17. 1616
$0.6
$1.2
$1.9
$2.5
$3.2
$3.8
$-
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
$3.5
$4.0
$175/t $200/t $225/t $250/t $275/t $300/t
C$B
FOB Price (US$/t)
NPV - Pre-tax at 8%
BASE CASE
Ultra-Low Volatile PCI
US$175/tonne (C$1 = US$0.95)
PRE-TAX AFTER TAX
IRR 17.0% 14.7%
NPV (8%) C$615.9 million C$405.8 million
Capital (Years 1-3) C$788.6 million
(includes railway capital)
Positive Feasibility Study
 October 2012 update to 2005 & 2010 FS
 Based on railway transport of coal to Ridley Coal Terminal in Prince Rupert
 Initial 3 Mtpa production from Lost Fox deposit open pit mine, wash plant & site infrastructure
 69.2 Mt of product coal reserves – 25+ years production (small fraction of total resource)
 Premium ultra-low volatile PCI product
 Can diversify product mix to produce premium products (charge carbon) & sinter
 Life of mine average Free On Board (FOB) vessel cash cost C$127.61/tonne (US$121.22/tonne)
 C1 operating cash cost C$119.85/tonne (US$113.86) FOB
The 2012 Feasibility Study was prepared by Golder-Marston in compliance with
NI 43-101. Mr. Edward (Ted) Minnes, P.E. is the Qualified Person responsible for the study.

18. 1717
Permitting Update – Work Underway
 Arctos project identified on BC Government Major Investment Office List
 Project Description Report completed & submitted to EA agencies
 Gaps Analysis & Work Plan completed
 Baseline Field Work
 Additional field work for mine area & road access corridor in progress
 Field work commenced August 2012, report by Fall 2013
 Environmental Impact Statement/BCEAA Application
 Preparing Draft Application Information Requirements (dAIR)
 Targeting submission of dAIR Q2-2013
 Preparation of Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Q4-2012
 Anticipated completion of EIS by spring 2014 after baseline reports completed
 Document will be forwarded to Aboriginal groups in draft for review

19. 1818
Tahltan Nation
 Agreements to Date
 Environmental Assessment Process
Funding
 Traditional Knowledge Agreement
 Confidentiality Agreement – PEM Data
Shipping Agreement
 Community engagement in progress
 Long history of bilateral discussions and
meetings
Aboriginal Update
Gitxsan Nation
 Proposed new railway passes through 5
Gitxsan house territories
 MOU completed with Gitxsan Hereditary
Chiefs
 Access Agreements completed
 Quarterly meetings with chiefs of the subject
watersheds
 Annual presentations at Gitxsan Summit
 Gitxsan Community Liaison hired
 Traditional Use & Knowledge Study to be
completed in cooperation with hereditary
chiefs

20. 1919
Government Update – Overview
 What’s new:
 Federal & BC Government recognition that permitting process needs to be streamlined
 Federal & BC Government harmonization of EA process
 A re-energized approach to mine development
 BC Government focused on Premier Clark’s BC Jobs Plan
 Premier committed to eight new mines in operation by 2015
 Premier committed to nine existing mine expansions by 2015
 Key initiatives:
 Expedited permitting process
 Establishment of the Major Investments Office – Arctos identified as major project
 Investment in trade infrastructure, i.e., ports
 Pacific Gateway Policy
 Revenue sharing with Aboriginal groups

21. 2020
Significant Upside Potential
One of world’s largest undeveloped deposits – railway transportation solution provides scalable
expansion potential
 Rail transportation allows for higher annual production than 3 Mtpa & will lower some cost for inbound freight
 FS reserves only represents small fraction of total resource
 Updated reserves for Lost Fox deposit can support higher production rates (4 Mtpa ramp-up sensitivity)
 Production can be expanded from adjacent Hobbit – Broatch deposit
 Current resource only identified to 350 metres – Additional coal seams identified at depth (potential
underground mining)
 Budget in place for additional drilling
 3rd Party contribution to railway capital costs increases NPV
 BC Government extending electrical grid & connection would lower power & mine operating costs & enable
use of lower operating cost electrified mining equipment
 Lease-to-purchase of mobile equipment fleet & contract mining would lower upfront capital & increase IRR

22. 2121
Development Strategy
 Development program underway
 Next steps include:
 Continue Tahltan, Gitxsan & stakeholder engagement
 Environmental, socio-cultural & economic studies underway in support of permitting process
 Project Description has been submitted to CEAA, BCEAO & Aboriginal groups
 Complete the environmental assessment & permitting processes
 Complete engineering on railway transportation with CN Rail & complete MOU
 Secure port handling agreements
 Conduct additional expansion drilling
 Second stage strategic partner(s) & project financing
 Deloitte is engaged to advise on project financing & development options, targeting a project level joint
venture, potentially including:
• Minority equity investment
• Off-take relationship
• Commitment to arrange debt financing for construction

23. 22
2013 2014 2015 2016
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Project Description submission
Baseline field work & document prep
Filing of EIS-EAC documents
EAO-CEAA review process
Ministerial decision process
Mine permitting
Construction
Commissioning & commercial
production
Targeted Milestones
Proposed Development Timeline

24. 23
NICO Gold-Cobalt-Bismuth-Copper Project Highlights
 Positive Front End Engineering & Design Study (FEED) completed
in 2012 based on a vertically integrated mine & mill in the
Northwest Territories & refinery in Saskatchewan
 FEED - ~30% of detailed engineering complete for
procurement
 Robust economics – generates NPV of $309 million* – highly
leveraged to increased cobalt & gold prices with low
downside risk
 Negative cash cost – cobalt cash cost (net of credits) of
negative US$0.81/lb at Base Case prices & negative
US$1.07/lb at Current Prices
 High-grade deposit of combined gold, cobalt, and bismuth co-
products plus by-product copper
 Positioned to be one of the largest & lowest cost suppliers of
cobalt sulphate to the rapidly expanding battery sector
 Very advanced project with $100 million already invested –
including pilot plants, test mining and extensive permitting work
– resulting in planned production in 2015
 Strong management & board with experience in mine permitting,
development & operations Test mining 2006/2007
*Base case: pre-tax, 7% discount rate

25. 24
 Gold price increased consistently in the past
decade, especially after recent economic
downturn
 While mine supply remains relatively flat, future
demand continues to grow:
 Growing physical demand from Asia &
central banks
 Growing investment demand based on
currency protection & safe haven status
 Provides a flexible financing opportunity
NICO contains 1.1 million ounces of gold
– provides a significant counter-cyclical hedge
Gold: Counter Cyclical Hedge
Source: Bloomberg; Energy & Metals Consensus Forecasts December 2012
$310
$363
$410 $445
$604
$697
$873 $873
$1,211
$1,574
$1,669
$1,794
$-
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
$2,000
Historical & Forecast Gold Price

26. 25
Wide Application of Industrial Usage
Cobalt: Robust & Diverse Market
Source: CRU, Cobalt Development Institute
 Wide chemical and metallurgical market
applications in batteries, high strength alloys,
cutting tools, catalysts, etc.
 Cobalt sulphate is used in lithium ion & nickel
metal hydride batteries for electronic devices &
hybrid/electric vehicles
 High purity cobalt is used in aerospace
applications
 Cobalt demand expected to grow at ~7% per
year in the next five years
 Over the past decade, increase in demand
resulted almost exclusively from increase in
chemical applications, most notably
rechargeable batteries and catalysts
 Chemical applications accounted for ~55% of
worldwide cobalt demand in 2011 & are
expected to dominate future cobalt
consumption
27%
19%
13%
10%
9%
7%
6%
5%
4% Batteries (27%)
Superalloy (19%)
Hard Materials (13%)
Colours (10%)
Catalysts (9%)
Magnets (7%)
Hardfacing & Other Alloys (6%)
Tyre Adhesives, Soaps, Driers (5%)
Feedstuffs (4%)

27. 26
* Electric vehicles include hybrid electric vehicles (HEV), plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) & pure electric vehicles (EV)
Source: Roskill
Cobalt: Rechargeable Batteries Drive Demand
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2008 2010f 2012f 2014f 2016f 2018f 2020f
MillionsofUnits
Global Electric Vehicle Battery Sales
Approx. 20% compound annual
growth forecast from 2011 to 2020
 Cobalt is critical for manufacturing batteries used in electric vehicles*, computers, cell phones & other
electronic devices
 Nickel metal hydride car batteries contain approximately 3 to 5 lbs of cobalt
 Lithium-ion car batteries contain 2 to 5 kg of cobalt
 Cobalt usage in batteries is expected to grow from 25% of demand in 2011 to 45% in 2018

28. 27
51%
12%
7% 7% 5% 5% 4% 3% 2% 2% 2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Congo Zambia China Russia Other
Countries
Australia Cuba Canada New
Caledonia
Brazil Morocco
Proportion of World Cobalt Production (%)
Cobalt: Shortage of Reliable Supply
 World market of refined cobalt production ~82,000t, excluding some secondary processing & scrap
 Vast majority of cobalt sourced from regions that are politically unstable or prone to export restrictions
 Congo (DRC) currently accounts for 51% of global supply
 China has the largest refining capacity (43% in 2010) but limited mine supply
 Chemical production is in deficit by about 14,000 t in 2011
 LME initiated futures market trading for cobalt in 2010, resulting in a more liquid market
 NICO will be a reliable North American producer
Source: USGS Industry Survey

29. 28
Growing Number of Applications
Bismuth: Environmentally Friendly
 Traditionally used in fusible alloys, cosmetics, chemicals etc.
 New markets focus on super conductors, CDs & auto anti-corrosion materials
 Environmentally safe replacement for lead in plumbing & electronic solders, brass, ceramic glazes, free
cutting steel, hot dip galvanizing & paint pigments
 Global framework to eliminate lead expected to drive increased bismuth consumption
 European legislation to eliminate lead in electronics
Source: USGS Industry Survey

30. 29
240,000
11,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000
39,000
48,661
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
China Peru Bolivia Mexico Canada Kazakhstan Other Countries NICO
Tonnes
World Bismuth Reserves
Bismuth: Limited Supply
 World market between 15,000 & 20,000 t per year
 China is the principal source of bismuth (240 Kt reserve), accounting for 80% of world reserves & 73% of
world production in 2010
 China has closed 20% of its production due to environmental concerns & China’s exports could halve in 2012
due to export restrictions (only 1,242 t in the first four months)
 NICO contains over 48 Kt of bismuth, equivalent to 15% of world reserves & the world’s largest deposit
NICO is the world’s
largest deposit of
bismuth
*Excluding NICO
Source: USGS Industry Survey 2010
*

31. 30
Introduction to NICO Project & SMPP
Saskatchewan Metals Processing
Plant (SMPP)
NICO Project
 Large scale gold-cobalt-bismuth deposit
 160 km from City of Yellowknife
 450 km from railway at Hay River
 High concentration ratio using simple
flotation – 4,650 t of ore / day reduced to
180 t of concentrate
 Allows shipping to Saskatchewan for lower
cost processing
 Hydrometallurgical plant to process bulk
concentrate from NICO
 Plant will produce gold doré, cobalt sulphate
&/or cobalt cathode, bismuth ingot & copper
metal precipitate

32. 31
 5,140 Ha lease in southern NWT
 Winter access roads
 All-weather road planned by governments
to highway (135 km)
 $1.5 million in place for baseline
environmental survey
 Engineering & environmental work
underway
 450 km from railway at Hay River for
transport of concentrates to SMPP
 160 km from City of Yellowknife
 50 km from Town of Whati
 22 km from Snare Hydro
 Settled land claims with Tlicho Government
Mine Location & Infrastructure

33. 32
Saskatchewan Metals Processing Plant
 Hydrometallurgical plant to process bulk
concentrate from NICO mine & mill to
produce gold doré, cobalt sulphate or
cathode, bismuth ingot & copper metal
 Lands near Saskatoon purchased:
 Located on CN Rail line
 Close to Trans Canada Hwy
 Inexpensive power (5.7 cents / kWh)
 Close to natural gas & reagent sources
 Skilled worker / engineer pool
 5 year tax holiday

34. 33
Underground Mineral Reserves Tonnes Au (g/t) Co (%) Bi (%) Cu (%)
Proven 282,000 4.93 0.14 0.27 0.03
Probable 94,000 5.6 0.11 0.19 0.01
Total 376,000 5.09 0.13 0.25 0.02
Note: Sums of the combined mineral reserves may not exactly equal sums of the underground and open pit reserves due to rounding.
Reserve estimate by P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Eugene Puritch, P.Eng. & Fred Brown, CPG PrSciNat, Qualified Persons as defined by NI-43-101
Open Pit Mineral Reserves Tonnes Au (g/t) Co (%) Bi (%) Cu (%)
Proven 20,513,000 0.94 0.11 0.15 0.04
Probable 12,099,000 1.05 0.11 0.13 0.04
Total 32,612,000 0.98 0.11 0.14 0.04
Combined Mineral Reserves Tonnes Au (g/t) Co (%) Bi (%) Cu (%)
Proven 20,795,000 0.99 0.11 0.15 0.04
Probable 12,193,000 1.09 0.11 0.13 0.04
Total 32,988,000 1.02 0.11 0.14 0.04
Contained Metal
1,085,000
ounces
82,268,000
pounds
102,053,000
pounds
27,179,000
pounds
NICO Mineral Reserves

35. 34
Well-Understood Geology
The NICO mineral reserves are based on 327 drill holes & surface trenches
 Deposit is an Iron Oxide Copper Gold (“IOCG”) class deposit, commonly referred to as Olympic Dam-type
after the dominant “Super Giant” deposit in South Australia
 Ore is hosted in three lenses of brecciated ironstone up to 1.3 km in length, 550 m in width, & 70 m in
thickness
Green = Upper Ore Zone, Blue = Middle Ore Zone, Red = Lower Ore Zone
Brown = Open Pit, Cyan = Underground Development and Stopes

36. 35
 Mining conditions, geometry &
grades confirmed
 Environmental impacts assessed
 Portal, 2 km of decline ramp & 2
mine levels established with
ventilation raise to surface
 ~$20 million pre-production
development completed
 Large sample collected for pilot
plant testing
Underground Test Mining Complete

37. 36
 1997-2012 Metallurgical expenditures ~$12 M
 Lab & bench scale test work
 2007 200 t bulk sample pilot plant study
 Proved process flow sheet
 Established baseline process
performance & products
 Improved recoveries over feasibility study
 Provided samples for environmental tests
 Proved co-disposal of tails with waste rock
 2010-2012 30 t pilot study
 Verified higher gold recoveries from regrind of
cleaner float tails
 Proved blending of bismuth residue with cobalt
autoclave feed
 Eliminated 1 of 2 gold circuits at SMPP
 Higher gold recovery & reduced risk
 Higher cobalt recovery
 Verified cobalt sulphate process
 2008-2012 FEED report & detailed engineering
Extensive Metallurgy Work

38. 37
Positive Pilot Plant Results
 Continuous flotation tests to produce separate cobalt & bismuth concentrates
 Recovery improvements to Co, Bi, Au & Cu
 Proved process flow sheet, production of high value products & improved metal recoveries
 Cobalt pressure oxidation, precipitation & electrowinning to demonstrate production of 99.8% cobalt
cathode or solvent extraction & crystallization to 20.9% cobult sulphate
 Bismuth ferric chloride leaching, production of 99.5% bismuth cathode as powder - Flux & smelt to
>99.9% bismuth ingot
 Ability to produce thickened tailings from bulk tailings
Cobalt Cathode Metal
Co >99.95%
Cobalt Carbonate
Co 50.6%
Bismuth Ingot
Bi >99.99%
Cobalt Sulphate
(heptahydrate)
Co 20.9%

39. 38
2012 FEED Study
FEED Study Highlights – Base Case, Cobalt Sulphate
Mine type Open pit with underground in 2nd year
Mining method
Open pit: conventional truck & loader
Underground: blasthole open stoping
Strip Ratio Waste to ore 3.0 : 1
Processing rate 4,650 tonnes of ore/day
Mine life 19.8 years (potential for additional 3.2)
Processing Processed to high value metal products
Pre-tax NPV (7%) $308.5 million
Pre-tax IRR 14.0%
Capital costs $440.5 million
LOM average revenue/yr $194 million
LOM average operating cost/yr $97 million
Cobalt operating cost (net of
credits)
Negative US$0.81/lb at Base Case
Negative US$1.07/lb at Current Price
Case
Positive FEED Study demonstrating very
low costs & strong economics
 Vertically integrated project consisting of
open pit & underground mine, mill &
hydrometallurgical refinery
 Low capital costs of $441 million
 Negative cash cost net of credits
 Significant detailed engineering, reducing
project risk
 Golden Giant Mine (Hemlo) equipment
purchased & dismantled for relocation
 Metal recoveries verified from pilot plants;
 Gold recovery ranges from 56 to 85%,
with an average of 73.7%
 Cobalt recovery of 84%
 Bismuth recovery of 72%
 Copper recovery of 41%

40. 39
Balanced Production Scenario
Annual Production 3,473,600 lbs 40,000 oz 3,681,800 lbs 559,400 lbs
NICO will be a reliable Canadian-based producer of strategic metals:
 Gold doré, 99.8% cobalt cathode &/or 20.9% cobalt sulphate, 99.99% bismuth ingot, & a copper metal
precipitate
$89
$61
$43
$1
$67
$69
$43
$2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Cobalt Sulphate Gold Bismuth Copper
C$M
Average Annual Revenue by Metal – Base Case (gold) & Recent Price (grey)
Base Case Price assumptions are US$1,450/troy ounce (“oz”) for gold, US$20/pound (“lb”) for cobalt, US$11/lb for bismuth and US$3.50/lb for copper at an exchange rate of US$ 0.95 = C$
1. Recent Price assumptions are US$1,650/oz for gold, US$15/lb for cobalt, US$11/lb for bismuth and US$3.50/lb for copper at an exchange rate of US$ 0.95 = C$ 1.

41. 40
Negative Cash Costs
NICO has negative operating costs for all metals net of by-product credits
 Demonstrates that after capital has been repaid, operations can be sustained during periods of low metal
prices & volatility
-$0.81
-$1.07
-$1.20
-$1.00
-$0.80
-$0.60
-$0.40
-$0.20
$0.00
Base Case Current Price
CashCostNetofBy-Products($US/lb)
Cobalt
-$12.78
-$7.99
-$14
-$12
-$10
-$8
-$6
-$4
-$2
$0
Base Case Current Price
CashCostNetofBy-Products($US/lb)
Bismuth
-$738.75
-$148.42
-$800
-$700
-$600
-$500
-$400
-$300
-$200
-$100
$0
Base Case Current Price
CashCostNetofBy-Products($US/oz)
Gold
Note: Based on cobalt sulphate option. Base Case Price assumptions are US$1,450/troy ounce (“oz”) for gold, US$20/pound (“lb”) for cobalt, US$11/lb for bismuth and US$3.50/lb for
copper at an exchange rate of US$ 0.95 = C$ 1. . The Current Price Case uses prices as at May 31, 2012 and are US$1,558.00/oz for gold, US$15.23/lb for cobalt, US$10.55/lb for bismuth and
US$3.40/lb for copper and an exchange rate of US$ 0.97 = C$ 1. Mr. Alexander Duggan, P.Eng. and Mr. Graham Peter Holmes, P.Eng. of Jacobs are the Qualified Persons for Jacobs and Mr.
Eugene Puritch, P.Eng. is the Qualified Person responsible for the work by P&E under NI 43-101.

42. 41
Low Capital Costs
Capital costs total $441 million for the first 2 years of the project, including all direct & indirect
costs & contingencies
210
230
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
$500
CapitalCosts(C$M)
Summary of Capital Costs
NICO Site SMPP Site
SMPP Site Capital Costs
 Refinery
 Rail load out
 Ponds
NICO Site Capital Costs
 Mine & mill
 Access road
 Camp
 Tailings storage facility
 Power plant
Note: based on cobalt sulphate option.

43. 42
Economics – Highly Leveraged to Gold
NICO demonstrates robust economics through a range of commodity prices
$309
$147
$110
$467
$707
$466
$270
$228
$660
$951
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
Base Case Prices 3-Yr Trailing Average
Prices
Current Prices Escalated Prices Optimistic Prices
C$M
Economics for Cobalt Sulphate Option
NPV (7% discount)
NPV (5% discount)
IRR 14.0% 10.5% 9.6% 17.1% 21.6%
Note: all values are pre-tax.

44. 43
Additional Upside
Significant opportunity existing to further strengthen project economics
 Extend mine life for 3+ years with stockpiled subeconomic material
 Alternative power supply to mine to lower costs
 Move forward gold production via additional underground mining to access high grade material
 Custom processing of concentrates to defer SMPP
 Generate additional returns from SMPP
 Custom processing of concentrates sourced from other mines globally
 Expansion potential already designed
 Continue generating revenues after NICO ores depleted
 Significant commodity prices upside
 Cobalt – potential for supply disruptions in the
DRC and less than expected production from
laterites
 Gold – counter-cyclical hedge
 Bismuth – potential for decreased Chinese
supply due to export quotas and increased
environmental restrictions

45. 44
Production Targeted in 2015
Progressing through final stages of permitting process
 Environmental Assessments well advanced for mine & SMPP permitting
 Mackenzie Valley Review Board recommended approval of mine & mill Jan. 25, 2013 – Pending approval
of Minister & Tlicho Government
 For SMPP, addendum to Environmental Impact Statement submitted for review & public comment, after
which government approval will be pending
Advanced relationships with Aboriginal groups
 Signed Co-operative Relationship Agreement with
Tlicho Government
 Initiated Tlicho Participation Agreement (PA)
Negotiations
Project Financing & Development Options
 Deloitte engaged to advise on project financing &
development options, targeting a project level joint
venture, potentially including:
 Minority equity investment
 Off-take relationship
 Commitment to arrange debt
financing for construction

46. 45
Production Targeted in 2015
Proposed Development Timeline
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
SMPP EA
SMPP fully permitted
NICO environmental
review
NICO Minister’s
approval
NICO fully permitted
Financing
Engineering &
procurement
Construction
Commissioning
Commercial
operations

47. 46
Emerging Metallurgical Coal, Gold & Specialty
Metals Producer
 Two advanced Canadian development assets
 One of the world’s premier metallurgical coal developments,
1.1 million ozs. gold, 82 million lbs. cobalt & 15% of global
bismuth reserves
 $200 million combined expenditures
 Positive Feasibility Studies, test mined, pilot plant processed &
in permitting
 Low cost production
 Combined NPV’s approaching $1 billion
 Experienced board & management team
 Deloitte & Touche LLP engaged to secure strategic
partners to finance both projects with minimal
equity dilution

48. 47
Directors
Mahendra Naik, B Comm, CA Chairman, Director CFO Fundeco - Founding director & former CFO, IAMGOLD
George Doumet, MSc, MBA Honorary Chairman, Director Chemical Engineer – President & CEO, Federal White Cement
Robin Goad, MSc, PGeo President & CEO, Director Geologist - 30 yrs mining & exploration experience
David Knight, BA, LLB Secretary, Director Partner, Norton Rose specializing in securities & mining law
James Excell, BASc Director Metallurgical Engineer – 35 yrs mining experience BHP-Billiton
William Breukelman, BASc, MBA, PEng Director Chemical Engineer – Chairman, Gedex
James Currie, BSc (Hons), PEng Director Mining Engineer – COO, Elgin Mining
The Honorable Carl L. Clouter Director Commercial pilot - former owner of charter airline in NWT
Shou Wu (Grant) Chen, MSc, MBA Director Geologist – Deputy Chairman & CEO, China Mining Resources Group
Management
Julian Kemp, BBA, CA, C.Dir VP Finance & CFO Chartered Accountant – 20+ yrs mining financial experience
Mike Romaniuk, BASc, PEng VP Operations Geologist & Process Engineer – 25+ yrs engineering, mining & construction
experience primarily with Xstrata Nickel & Falconbridge
Bill Shepard Logistics Manager 15 yrs experience in procurement & logistics
Richard Schryer, PhD Director Regulatory &
Environmental Affairs
Aquatic Scientist –20+ yrs experience in mine permitting & environmental
assessments
Adam Jean, HBA, CA Controller Chartered Accountant previously with Ernst & Young
Mike Middaugh Project Controls Manager 20 yrs major construction & project management
Keith Lee, BSc Senior Process Engineer 25 yrs operations, engineering & mineral processing experience
Carl Kottmeier, MBA, PEng Project Manager Mining Engineer – 24 yrs engineering & operations experience
Seok Joon Kim, MASc, PEng Senior Mining Engineer Mining Engineer – 10+ years operations & engineering experience
Experienced Team

49. 48
Appendix: Economics & Price Assumptions
Base Case Price assumptions are US$1,450/troy ounce (“oz”) for gold, US$20/pound (“lb”) for cobalt, US$11/lb for bismuth and US$3.50/lb for copper at an
exchange rate of US$ 0.95 = C$ 1. The 3-year Trailing Average Prices Case are as at May 31, 2012 and are US$1,359.94/oz for gold, US$18.53/lb for cobalt,
US$9.83/lb for bismuth and US$3.51/lb for copper and an exchange rate of US$ 0.98 = C$ 1. The Current Price Case uses prices as at May 31, 2012 and are
US$1,558.00/oz for gold, US$15.23/lb for cobalt, US$10.55/lb for bismuth and US$3.40/lb for copper and an exchange rate of US$ 0.97 = C$ 1. The Escalated
Price Case uses metal price assumptions of US$1,800.00/oz for gold, US$22.50/lb for cobalt, US$12.50/lb for bismuth and US$4.00/lb for copper and an exchange
rate of US$ 1 = C$ 1. For the Optimistic Price Case uses US$2,000.00/oz for gold, US$25.00/lb for cobalt, US$15.00/lb for bismuth and US$4.50/lb for copper at
an exchange rate of US$ 1 = C$ 1. Mr. Alexander Duggan, P.Eng. and Mr. Graham Peter Holmes, P.Eng. of Jacobs are the Qualified Persons for Jacobs and Mr.
Eugene Puritch, P.Eng. is the Qualified Person responsible for the work by P&E under NI 43-101.
Metal Price &
Exchange Rate Case
Cobalt Metal Option Cobalt Sulphate Option
Pre-Tax After Tax Pre-Tax After Tax
IRR
%
$M
NPV
(7%)
$M
NPV (5%)
IRR
%
$M
NPV
(7%)
$M
NPV
(5%)
IRR
%
$M
NPV
(7%)
$M
NPV
(5%)
IRR
%
$M
NPV
(7%)
$M
NPV
(5%)
Base Case Prices 10.8 164.5 293.2 9.6 101.0 207.1 14.0 308.5 466.0 12.4 212.6 338.7
3-yr Trailing
Average Prices
7.4 17.1 114.6 6.6 (15.3) 69.0 10.5 146.8 270.0 9.3 86.7 188.4
Current Prices 7.1 2.1 99.7 6.2 (30.6) 53.4 9.6 109.5 228.2 8.5 57.6 156.8
Escalated Prices 13.9 315.2 477.8 12.3 214.9 344.7 17.1 467.1 660.1 15.2 332.4 483.7
Optimistic Prices 18.3 539.5 749.8 16.3 387.5 551.3 21.6 707.0 951.1 19.3 514.5 702.3

50. 49
Notes

51. 50
Notes

52. For further information, please contact:
Troy Nazarewicz, Investor Relations Manager
148 Fullarton Street, Suite 1600
London, Ontario, Canada
N6A 5P3
Tel. (519) 858-8188
Fax. (519) 858-8155
E-mail. tnazarewicz @fortuneminerals.com
Website. www.fortuneminerals.com
Emerging Strategic
Metal & Coal
Producer
TSX-FT
OTC QX-FTMDF