2. CITA–ICAT
UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI
DI MILANO
ABabcdfghiejkl
2
The scientific results that we present today are a product of
the Planck Collaboration, including individuals from more
than 100 scientific institutes in Europe, the USA and Canada
Planck is a
project of the
European Space
Agency, with
instruments
provided by two
scientific
Consortia
funded by ESA
member states
(in particular
the lead
countries:
France and
Italy) with
contributions
from NASA
(USA), and
telescope
reflectors
provided in a
collaboration
between ESA
and a scientific
Consortium led
and funded by
Denmark.
2
3. CITA–ICAT
UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI
DI MILANO
ABabcdfghiejkl
2
The scientific results that we present today are a product of
the Planck Collaboration, including individuals from more
than 100 scientific institutes in Europe, the USA and Canada
Planck is a
project of the
European Space
Agency, with
instruments
provided by two
scientific
Consortia
funded by ESA
member states
(in particular
the lead
countries:
France and
Italy) with
contributions
from NASA
(USA), and
telescope
reflectors
provided in a
collaboration
between ESA
and a scientific
Consortium led
and funded by
Denmark.
2
4. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck 3
• Planck
• Maps
• CMB Likelihoood
• CMB Results on LCDM
• CMB results on extentions
• LSS results
• Next....
3
5. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Planck
4
Launch: May 14 2009
• 2 Instruments HFI+LFI
• Observation in 9 frequency bands
• 22 radiometers (LFI) and 56 sensitive /
fast bolometers (HFI)
• 5 stages cryogenic cooling chain
• Aug. 2009: survey started
• Nov. 2010: nominal mission (2 surveys)
achieved
• Mid-Jan. 2012: extended cryogenic
mission (5 surveys) achieved
• Summer 2013: warm mission achieved
4
6. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Why Planck ?
5
At decision time (~1992)
At launch
At my PhD (~2000)
5
7. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Why Planck ?
6
Probing large and small scales with same
instrument to avoid calibration problems
6
8. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Why Planck ?
7
WMAP SPT
Probing low and high frequencies to have a better
handle on contaminating foregrounds
30 44 77 100 143 217 353 545 857
7
9. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Planck-HFI: technological success
8
1.6 K
Cryostat He3/He4
Extremely complex but extremely stable cryogenic chain
100 mK
4 K
8
10. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Planck-HFI: technological success
8
1.6 K
Cryostat He3/He4
Extremely complex but extremely stable cryogenic chain
100 mK
4 K
8
11. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Planck: data analysis success
9
143 GHz
545 GHz
blind bolometer
Galaxy
cosmics
Dipole
33GHz 44GHz 70GHz
100GHz 143GHz 217GHz
353GHz 545GHz 857GHz
800 GB from L2
1010 sample per bolometer
5.107 pixels per map
9
12. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Planck: Scientific success
10
Early Results
• Release of Point sources
and SZ catalogues
• based on 11 month of data
• 27 papers
Results
• Release of maps,
catalogues, ...
• based on 14 month of data
• 28 papers
Intermediate Results
• based on 11 month of data
• 13 papers
2011 2013
10
13. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Some press coverage
11
March 21st or 22nd, 2013
11
14. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
2011+2013 Release
12
• Maps per frequency
• CMB maps
• component maps
• Lensing map
• Dust opacity map
• point sources catalogues
• SZ catalogue
• Likelihood ...
PLA: Planck Legacy Archive:
http://pla.esac.esa.int/pla/aio/planckProducts.html
LAMBDA:
http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov
12
15. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck 13
• Planck
• Maps
• CMB Likelihoood
• CMB Results on LCDM
• CMB results on extentions
• LSS results
• Next....
13
16. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
2013 Results
14
Low frequency CO Dust
14
25. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Cosmology
21
• Amplitude of the fluctuations mostly from the
plateau
• Sound horizon: first peak location
• Total matter: changes the contrast between
the peaks
• Baryon density: changes the ratio between
peak heights (inertia)
• Reionisation optical depth: damps small
scales. Constrained from large scale
polarisation but also marginally from lensing
• H0: derived from above parameters
• Curvature: large scales (ISW) small scales
(lensing)
• Neutrino masses: small scales (lensing)
21
26. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck 22
• Planck
• Maps
• CMB Likelihoood
• CMB Results on LCDM
• CMB results on extentions
• LSS results
• Next....
22
27. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Likelihood large scales
• pixel based likelihood for
l=[2,49]
• CMB map @ low resolution
• 4 algorithms: very similar
results
• Error: dominated by cosmic
variance
• Anomaly: points lower than
best model, no effect on
cosmology
23
23
28. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Likelihood small scales
• Cl likelihood for l=[50,2500]
• power spectra of maps @
100, 143, 217 GHz
• No foreground cleaning in
maps, but optimized masks
and l-regions
• Modelling of CMB
+contaminants
24
24
30. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck 26
• Planck
• Maps
• CMB Likelihoood
• CMB Results on LCDM
• CMB results on extentions
• LSS results
• Next....
26
31. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
ΛCDM
• 6 parameters
• 2 primordial spectrum
• 1 expansion rate
• 2 paramaters for densities
• reionization
• Hypothesis (relaxed for extension)
• Flat Universe
• No running
• No tensor
27
• 3 neutrinos species
• Standard neutrinos with
low mass
27
32. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Results
• +WP :WMAP polarisation (TE+EE @ low-l)
‣ breaks As-tau degeneracy
• +HighL : +SPT+ACT for l in [2000,2500]
‣ better foreground handling
28
28
33. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Standard cosmology
29
18 fold diminution in constraint volume compared to WMAP9 + SPT
33 marginalised nuisance + foreground parameters
%-level cosmology
Simple LCDM model works remarkably well
29
34. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Standard cosmology
29
18 fold diminution in constraint volume compared to WMAP9 + SPT
33 marginalised nuisance + foreground parameters
%-level cosmology
Simple LCDM model works remarkably well
29
35. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Heavier and older Universe
30
H0.............. 70.0 + 2.2 67.80 ± 0.77
Age............. 13.74 + 0.11 13.798 ± 0.037
30
36. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
(dis)agreement
31
Error bars divided by 2
31
38. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck 33
100 500 1000 2000
Multipole moment
0
500
1000
1500
2
D[mK2
]
ns = 0.96
ns = 1.00
33
39. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Inflation
34
Starting to exclude some inflation models
Scale invariant perturbation clearly excluded
34
40. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Inflation
• Measuring bispectrum: Search for specific
shapes in the 3pt correlation function →
Local type
• WMAP9 constraints on nonlinearity
parameter fNL local = 37 ± 20
• Upper bound limits extensions of singl-
field slow role inflation models
35
35
41. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck 36
• Planck
• Maps
• CMB Likelihoood
• CMB Results on LCDM
• CMB results on extentions
• LSS results
• Next....
36
43. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Other implications
38
• q: sound horizon is determined by the
position of the 7 peaks, and now
measured at 0.05% precision
• spatially flat Universe
• ns: exact scale invariance of the
primordial fluctuations is ruled out, at
more than 7s (as predicted by base
inflation models)
• Nucleosynthesis ok
• Upper limit on neutrino masses
• 3 neutrinos species favored by Planck
• no evidence for dynamical dark energy
• no evidence for running index dns/dlnk
q = 1.04147 ± 0.00056
ns = 0.9608 ± 0.0054
X
m⌫ < 0.23eV
Neff = 3.30+0.54
0.51
Yp = 0.267 ± 0.044
⌦k = 0.0007 ± 0.0033
38
44. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck 39
Cosmological model established
with exquisit CMB
but
Planck is not only a CMB
machine !
Planck probes:
Dark matter distribution
→ CMB lensing
Hot gas content
→ Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect
Star formation
→ Cosmic IR Background
39
45. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
CMB lensing: matter tracer
• Gravitational effect of the
LSS @ z=2 affects the
observed CMB
40
CMB lensing
detected at 25σ
significance
40
46. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
CMB lensing: matter tracer
41
• Reconstructed
projected mass
map
• Correlation with
external tracers
agrees well
Planck LCDM in
agreement with z=2
structures
Quasars – z ~ 1 Galaxy clusters – z ~ 0.2
Galaxies – z~ 0.5 Galaxies – z ~ 0.1
41
47. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
CIB: galaxy tracer
42
• This maps primarily show the Cosmic
Infrared Background, emission from
warm dust in distant star-forming
galaxies at redshifts between 1 and 3
• CIB = HFI - dust - CMB - PointSources
• Sub-degree clustered structures
correlate between frequencies Southern cap at 353 GHz
results 2011
2011
40deg2
2013
>1000deg2
42
48. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
CIBxlensing: dark matter tracer
Stacking the Planck mass maps at the positions of peaks
and troughs of Cosmic Infrared Background leads to a
strong detection of the mass associated with these
distant star forming galaxies.This is mostly Dark Matter.
43
1º
43
49. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
SZ effect: hot baryon tracer
44
Electron
énergétique
Amas de Galaxies: galaxies + gaz
CMB photon
Photon diffusé
plus chaud
R. A. Sunyaev Ya. B. Zeldovich
44
50. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
SZ effect: hot baryon tracer
44
Electron
énergétique
Amas de Galaxies: galaxies + gaz
CMB photon
Photon diffusé
plus chaud
R. A. Sunyaev Ya. B. Zeldovich
“Hole in the sky”
SZ,Comments on Astrophysics
and Space Physics 1972
44
51. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
SZ effect: hot baryon tracer
44
Electron
énergétique
Amas de Galaxies: galaxies + gaz
CMB photon
Photon diffusé
plus chaud
R. A. Sunyaev Ya. B. Zeldovich
“Hole in the sky”
SZ,Comments on Astrophysics
and Space Physics 1972
44
53. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Planck SZ catalogue
46
• PSZ based on [100-857]GHz
maps
• 3 detection algorithms
• on ~84% of the sky
• 1227 clusters & candidates
• 683 previously known
• 178 new clusters
• 366 candidates
• z in [0-1]
• M in [1~20] 1014 M☉
• Mmed ~ 3.5 1014 M☉
• see Planck 2013 XXIX & PLA
46
54. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
SZ cluster number counts
• Reference mass function:Tinker et al.
• Reference scalingY-M: based on 71 Planck clusters
• Reference selection function: based on Planck noise maps
• Reference sample: S/N selected sample of 189 PSZ clusters
Internal consistency: use mostly Planck information
47
(1-b): bias between hydrostatic
equilibrium mass and total mass
0.50 2.0
-120
-60
0
60
120
-75
-60
-45
-30
-15
0
15
30
45
60
75
47
55. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Constraints from SZ counts
48
SZ+BAO
SZ+HST
degeneracy
8(⌦m/0.29)0.32
48
56. M. Douspis, 03/04/2013, Cosmology from Planck SZ cluster counts
Robustness
• Reference run (SZ+BAO)
• S/N>8 sample
• MMF1 sample
• MC-based completeness
• Reference run (SZ+BAO)
• Free redshift evolution of scaling
• Watson et al. mass function
• (1-b) in [0.7-1.0]
49
95% CL
95% CL
49
57. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Coherent view from clusters
• Comparison with some
Optical, X-rays, SZ constraints
using clusters
50
0.700.750.800.850.900.95
8(M/0.27)0.3
WL*
X-rays*
MaxBCG*
ACT
SPT
Planck
Planck
SPT
WMAP
Clusters CMBLSS
50
58. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Comparison with CMB
• Higher values of Ωm,σ8 in
Planck CMB analysis
• 3σ tension
• More general tension between
clusters and CMB ?
51
SZ+BAO
CMB
0.700.750.800.850.900.95
8(M/0.27)0.3
WL*
X-rays*
MaxBCG*
ACT
SPT
Planck
Planck
SPT
WMAP
Clusters CMBLSS
100
101
102
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
z
dNdz
Best model from Planck CMB
Best model from y-map
Best model
Planck counts
51
59. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
SZ counts & CMB
• Getting higher σ8 from clusters
• Change scaling
• Change bias
• Account for missing clusters
• Getting lower σ8 from CMB
• Change initial power
spectrum
• Change transfert function
52
52
60. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
SZ counts & CMB
• Higher σ8 in clusters
• (1-b)=0.55
• open question on baryons
• Only few missed clusters
• Lower σ8 in CMB
• running not enought
• massive neutrino
• 2 possible solutions that
reconcile SZ & CMB
53
SZ+CMB, b = 0.8
SZ+CMB, b in [0.7-1]
CMB
SZ+CMB+BAO, b [0.7-1]
SZ+CMB, b free
SZ+BAO
CMB
0.20.40.60.81.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
m
53
61. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
All sky map of the SZ signal
• Adapted component
separation methods based
on:
• constraints on emission
spectra + localisation in pixel
and multipole domains
• 100 to 857GHz channel maps
• Resolved SZ clusters
(from PSZ catalogue)
account for a significant
fraction of the tSZ signal
in the reconstructed maps
54
Coma O
North South
54
62. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Constraints from SZ map
• Three component model on
50% of the sky:
55
Cmodel
` = CSZ
` + Ccib
` + CP S
`
First measure of SZ spectra from large to
small scales
Consistency with cluster counts cosmology
55
63. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
And much more...
• Anomalies
• ISW
• proto-clusters
• Galaxy
• ...
56
• Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and results
• Planck 2013 results. II. Low Frequency Instrument data processing
• Planck 2013 results. III. LFI systematic uncertainties
• Planck 2013 results. IV. LFI beams
• Planck 2013 results.V. LFI calibration
• Planck 2013 results.VI. High Frequency Instrument data processing
• Planck 2013 results.VII. HFI time response and beams
• Planck 2013 results.VIII. HFI calibration and mapmaking
• Planck 2013 results. IX. HFI spectral response
• Planck 2013 results. X. HFI energetic particle effects
• Planck 2013 results. XI. Consistency of the data
• Planck 2013 results. XII. Component separation
• Planck 2013 results. XIII. Galactic CO emission
• Planck 2013 results. XIV. Zodiacal emission
• Planck 2013 results. XV. CMB power spectra and likelihood
• Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters
• Planck 2013 results. XVII. Gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
• Planck 2013 results. XVIII.The gravitational lensing-infrared background correlation
• Planck 2013 results. XIX.The integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect
• Planck 2013 results. XX. Cosmology from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts
• Planck 2013 results. XXI.All-sky Compton-parameter map and characterization
• Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation
• Planck 2013 results. XXIII. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB
• Planck 2013 results. XXIV. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity
• Planck 2013 results. XXV. Searches for cosmic strings and other topological defects
• Planck 2013 results. XXVI. Background geometry and topology of the Universe
• Planck 2013 results. XXVII. Special relativistic effects on the CMB dipole
•
• Planck 2013 results. XXVIII.The Planck Catalogue of Compact Sources
• Planck 2013 results. XXIX.The Planck catalogue of Sunyaev-Zeldovich sources
• Planck 2013 results. Explanatory supplement
56
64. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Conclusions
• Planck CMB sets the new
standard LCDM
• No extended LCDM needed
• Agreement with small scales
CMB, SN-union, BAO,
lensing x-correlations
• Tension with HST/H0,
clusters and SZ spectrum
• large scale anomaly ?
57
• Planck probes z~1000
• but also
• Dark matter z≾2
• Baryons/gas z≾1
• Baryons/light z~2-3
57
65. M. Douspis, 01/07/2013, Cosmology Results from Planck
Coming next
• in 2014 !
• 15 → 30 month
• Polarisation
58
58