Response by the OCDA to the Association of Orange County Deputy Sheriff’s (AOCD) ire as a result of the OCDA's use of the term "code of silence" to explain dismissal of People Vs. Hibbs Is COS (code of silence) part of the OCSD’s culture, something that just happened to show up during the Pople Vs. Hibbs’ trial as the Orange County District’s Attorney (OCDA) alleges, or simply a figment of the OCDA’s imagination as the Association of Orange County Deputy Sheriff’s (AOCD) claim? - refer to: http://www.atwebo.com/cotobuzz/2009/OCDA/CotoOCDAHibbs.htm

1. Case No: 08ZF0035

6. Deputy Wicks Deputy Hoffman FTO Hibbs Sgt. Long (Not present until conclusion of the use of force) FTO Thomas Arrestee Lares

13. Documents first use of force; no mention about second use of the Taser

18. FTO Thomas

19. FTO Thomas Deputy Hoffman

20. FTO Thomas Deputy Hoffman

21. FTO Thomas Deputy Hoffman

70. Deputy Wicks Deputy Hoffman FTO Hibbs Sgt. Long (Not present until conclusion of the use of force) FTO Thomas Arrestee Lares

73. Deputy Wicks Deputy Hoffman FTO Hibbs Sgt. Long (Not present until conclusion of the use of force) FTO Thomas Arrestee Lares

76. Deputy Wicks Deputy Hoffman FTO Hibbs Sgt. Long (Not present until conclusion of the use of force) FTO Thomas Arrestee Lares