1. Salt Production in the NW
Artibonite
An integrated plan for Agriculture,
Health and Reverse Migration
Amber Lynn Munger, JD
Director Article 29 Organization
2. Development of Plan
Dr. John Cox, Engineer, Cox & Speller
– UK
Amber Munger, Article 29 Organization
– Haiti, USA
Commissioned by Joe Mahoney, Irish
Salt Mining
– EU, USA
3. Presentation
Commune Anse Rouge
IDP
IDD
Two domains of
intervention
Salt production in CAR
Obstacles to Universal
Salt Iodization
Plan : A tale of two
companies
Benefits of the Plan
Obstacles and Needs
4.
5. Commune Anse Rouge
In general
– Health, potable water, education, irrigation, agriculture
3 agricultural environments
– Plain - irrigated/nonirrigated
– Mountain - rainfed agriculture
– Coastal region - desert environment - salt, fish
Salt is major form of income for the coastal region
6. IDP’s in CAR
Population (2009): 36,129 (Haitian Institute of Statistical Info)
Post EQ Survey (February 9th, 2010)
– 177 households
– 39.1% gain in population
14% (25) of households - no change
79% (140) households - 56.8% increase
6.7 % (12 households) - 28.8% decrease
“epidemi grangou”
7. Iodine Deficiency Disorder (IDD)
Effects of IDD
– #1 cause of developmental disability in the world
– Short stature
– Loss of IQ points
– Spontaneous abortions
– goiter
59% of Haitians are iodine deficient
The role of salt in combating IDD
8. Two Domains of IDD: Health
and Agriculture
Consumption end : health
– UNICEF, U Notre Dame, WFP, Ministry of
Health
Production end : agriculture
– WFP, AOPS, ACF, MI, AMURT, Ministry
of Agriculture (DDA)
15. Obstacles to Universal Salt
Iodization
“[Biggest obstacle to USI in Haiti is the
lack of a local source of quality salt]”
– Iodine Network
Transferring to the new technology
– Producers don’t understand new
technology?
– Producers don’t want the new
technology?
Economic interest
17. Two separate “companies”
Salt for export
– Produce 250-300,000
MT per year
– 10 - 15 year contract for
sale of 200-250,000 MT
– Washed salt for sale to
iodization company
– Cooperative Haitian
ownership or land lease
from US developer
Salt for iodization
– 40-50,000 MT salt for
iodization/yr
– Demand for entire
population of Haiti
– Cooperatively owned
local investment
– **Need to resolve
iodization location with
MSPP
18. Primary Benefits
Localized, national salt production, providing
consistent and reliable economic benefits from
long term export contracts to salt basin owners
and workers in Haiti’s NW Artibonite
High quality, washed salt, efficiently produced,
and available to be iodized for local consumption
On site iodization facility to complement the
effort of the PAP facility
Construction of a port in Commune Anse Rouge,
opening up access to this extraordinarily isolated
region
19. Secondary Benefits
Improved working conditions for salt workers
Increased long and short term employment
Expanded potential for agriculture
Improved access to potable water
Improved infrastructure, including electrification
Protection of the surrounding areas from flash-
flooding/inundation
Protection of mangrove forests
Potential for comprehensive watershed management due
to rising water table and need to protect new factory
Fisheries potential for salt basins that will not be
incorporated into the new factory
20. How is salt related to the past
and pending emergencies?
IDPs
Short and long term jobs starting as
early as February
Food and Economic Security in terms
of disaster preparedness
21. Potential problems with plan
Anse Rouge?
Risk of exploitation from business
investment
Business v. development plan
Missed opportunities regarding secondary
benefits, especially agriculture and
watershed protection
Missed opportunity regarding iodized salt
In 2009, 36,129 people were estimated to live in Commune Anse Rouge (Institut Ha�ien de Statistique et d棚nformatique, 2009). Since January of 2010, Commune Anse Rouge has experienced high in-migration of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs). A preliminary survey of 177 households in Anse Rouge using an FAO instrument showed a 39.1% increase in the commune痴 population (Munger, 2010), though individual households both gained and lost members (presumably family who left to work in Port-au-Prince). When separated into lost vs. gain strata, we see that while 25 of the 177 houses (14.1%) surveyed experienced no change, 140 households (79.0%) experienced an increase of 56.8% in their household size, and 12 households (6.7%) experienced a 28.8% decrease in household size. Even if this survey is not fully representative, it indicates that there has been substantial demographic movement into the area.