The document provides an overview of the European Court of Human Rights from 1959 to 2011 including:
- Near half of the Court's judgments found violations by four member states: Turkey, Italy, Russia, and Poland.
- Over 83% of the Court's total judgments found at least one violation of the Convention.
- Since 1998 reforms, over 91% of the Court's judgments have been delivered, with its caseload increasing considerably.
- Near half of the Court's violation judgments concerned violations of Article 6 on the right to a fair trial, while 58% concerned Articles 6 and Protocol 1 Article 1 on property rights.
- Statistics are given on violations by Article and by State from 1959
3. Overview 1959-2011 3
Violation judgments by State
Since it was established in 1959, the Court delivered more than 15,000 judgments.
Near the half of the judgments concerned four member States: Turkey (2,747),
Italy (2,166), Russia (1,212) and Poland (945).
Of the total number of judgments it has delivered since 1959, in over 83% of cases
the Court has found at least one violation of the Convention by the respondent
State.
Statistics
1959 to 2011
Italy
14.58%
Russia
8.15%
Poland
6.36%
Turkey
18.49%
France
5.70%
Other States
46.72%
4. 4 Overview 1959-2011
Judgments delivered by the Court
Since the reform of the Convention system on 1 November 1998, there has
been a considerable increase in the Court’s caseload. Barely ten years after
the reform, the Court delivered its 10,000th judgment. Its output is such that
more than 91% of the Court’s judgments since its creation in 1959 have been
delivered between 1998 and 2011.
In recent years the Court has concentrated on examining complex cases and
has decided to join certain applications which raise similar legal questions so
that it can consider them jointly. Thus, although the number of judgments
delivered each year is not increasing as rapidly as in the past, the Court has
examined more applications.
1959-
1998
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
1,105
837
177
695
888
844
703 718
1,560
1,503
1,543
1,625
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
1,499
1,157
5. Overview 1959-2011 5
Subject-matter of the Court’s violation judgments
Near the half of the judgments in which the Court found a violation included
a violation of Article 6, whether on account of the fairness or the length of
the proceedings. Furthermore, 58% of violations found by the Court concern
Article 6 and Protocol 1 Article 1 (Protection of property).
Lastly, more than 11% of violations found by the Court concern the right
to life or the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment
(Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention).
Right to an
effective remedy
(Art. 13)
8.1%
Right to a
fair trial (Art. 6)
45.01%
Right to liberty
and security
(Art. 5)
11.46%
Prohibition of torture
and inhuman or
degrading
treatment (Art. 3)
7.5%Protection of
property (P1-1)
13.35%
Other violations
10.43%
Right to
life (Art. 2)
4.15%