2. WORKSHOP GOALS
Seek guidance on a community-based
plan to further cyberinfrastructure in the
geosciences
Assess needs, visions, opportunities, and
challenges of the EarthCube builders for
system architecture
Identify ways the EarthCube Commons can
support this community
3. EARTHCUBE TEST ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE
An agile approach to
design a system that
catalyzes the field and
works for the
community
How do we link your
tools, standards, and
skills to create
EarthCube?
4. Organizational timeline – Year 1
Stakeholders
(Assembly) –
governance
ideas, testing
Integrate
stakeholder
concepts crowdsource
Synthesize
and
recommend
to NSF
Demo phase
Governance
charter
Governance timeline – Year 2
Establish
Organizational
Demo
Facilitate
convergence
on system
design, data
standards
Evaluate
results: basis for
long term
organization
NSF solicitation?
8. Providing a „backbone‟ to help build community
Governance is finding
solutions to specific
problems, fostering
trust, reconciling
interests, and
coordinating
communities.
9. INITIAL COMMUNITY FUNCTIONS
1.
Identify and Implement Vision, Mission, and
Goals
2.
Engage and Coordinate Across Community
3.
Create and Implement By-Laws and Charter
4.
Facilitate Agreement on and Maintain Viable
Architecture and Concept of Operations that
Enable Realization of Goals and Objectives of
EarthCube Vision
10. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT (YEAR 1): EARTHCUBE ASSEMBLY
Industry & FOSS:
Instrumentation,
Software, and
Technology
Developers
EarthCube
Awards
Research
Science
Communities
End-User
Communities &
Workshop
Participants
Data
Facilities &
Users
IT/CS/
Information
Scientists
Professional
Societies
Assembly
Advisory
Council
11. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT (YEAR 1): EARTHCUBE ASSEMBLY
Industry & FOSS:
Instrumentation,
Software, and
Technology
Developers
EarthCube
Awards
Research
Science
Communities
End-User
Communities &
Workshop
Participants
Assembly Advisory Council
Data
Facilities &
Users
IT/CS/
Information
Scientists
Professional
Societies
.
.
.
17. A CALL FOR YOUR INVOLVEMENT
• Upcoming community workshops: Jan – March 2014
• All Hands Meeting, June 24-26, 2014, Washington, DC
• Crowdsourcing:
• Strategic Pathways exercises
• Input & feedback on community
models
• Social Media – Twitter, Facebook
• www.earthcube.org
Notes de l'éditeur
Agile – several advisory committee & a development evaluation team – allow us to quickly change course if things aren’t working or we’re not getting the results we want.
Governance functions based on published governance research and community input. Specific sources include: Over 75 published research on governanceEarthCube Working Group and Concept Team draft roadmapsCommunity input during Governance Steering Committee virtual webinars – more than 30 webinarsJune charrette, July 2012 EarthCube Principle Investigator workshop, EarthCube sessions at the ESIP Federation Mid-Year Meeting in Madison, WI, July 17-20. #4 refers to the governance and organizational architecture and not any specific CI
What about agencies, intl, other science communities?
What about agencies, intl, other science communities?
Need feedback from broad cross-section of geoscientists on their ideas on EarthCube governance, and test how they would react to different externalities (NSF funding, support from university/employer, etc.) through game theory.