- 85% of milk in the USA is packaged in plastic jugs, so reducing the amount of plastic used can significantly lower the carbon footprint.
- The presentation discusses studies on reducing plastic in milk jugs through lighter container designs, adding calcium carbonate filler, and optimizing both light-weighting and filler additions.
- Integrated design across the supply chain, using minimum inputs and maximizing material use and recycling, is needed to create the most sustainable gallon jug in the future.
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Creating a more sustainable gallon jug for milk.
1. Creating A More Sustainable Gallon Jug
For Milk
Dr Gail Barnes, Partner, Personify LLC
International Dairy Show
Monday, November 4, 2013 - 12:30PM - 12:50PM
Booth 1074 - iDairyShow Theater
Chicago, IL
2. Summary
• 85% of fluid milk in the USA is packaged in monolayer HDPE packaging,
with the result that any reduction in the amount of plastic used can have a
major impact on reducing the carbon footprint.
• This presentation will discuss the results of studies of a progression of
ways in which the amount of plastic used in the creation of gallon jugs can
be reduced.
– Light-weighting through container design.
– Adding calcium carbonate as a filler.
– Light-Weighting + optimizing for calcium carbonate filler.
• These results meet recommendations coming out of the Life Cycle Analysis
study conducted by the Innovation Center for US Dairy which
recommended light-weighting or container weight reduction as a key
focus area for improvement in the supply chain impact of fluid milk.
• A recipe for the gallon jug of the future will be presented, and the
hypothesis made that “Integrated Design” will be the next frontier in
creating a more sustainable gallon jug for milk.
3. Packaging Principles
• Packaging should:
– Be fit for purpose.
– Be the lightest weight
possible.
– Use materials from the
most sustainable sources.
– Maximize opportunities for
recovery and recycling.
– Be designed to have the
lowest carbon impact.
– Be aesthetically pleasing
and convenient to use.
4. U.S. Fluid Milk Infographic
Source: Principles of a measurement framework: application to processing and
packaging technologies. Institute of Food Technologists
Annual Meeting and Food Expo, Las Vegas, NV, June 27, 2012
6. Processing & Packaging LCA
• Comprehensive LCA of fluid milk delivery
systems in the U.S.
• Assessment of environmental impacts of
18 fluid milk packaging and delivery
options.
Source: Principles of a measurement framework: application to processing and
packaging technologies. Institute of Food Technologists Annual Meeting
and Food Expo, Las Vegas, NV, June 27, 2012
7. Fluid Milk Delivery Systems Studied
Source: Principles of a measurement framework: application to processing and
packaging technologies. Institute of Food Technologists Annual Meeting
and Food Expo, Las Vegas, NV, June 27, 2012
8. Climate Change Impact Assessment
Source: Principles of a measurement framework: application to processing and
packaging technologies. Institute of Food Technologists
Annual Meeting and Food Expo, Las Vegas, NV, June 27, 2012
9. Non-Renewable Fossil Energy Assessment
Source: Principles of a measurement framework: application to processing and
packaging technologies. Institute of Food Technologists
Annual Meeting and Food Expo, Las Vegas, NV, June 27, 2012
10. Processing & Packaging LCA
Conclusion
• Differences between systems are relatively
small.
• Comparative assertions of performance are
not supported.
• Differences between systems are largely
defined by container material and mass.
Source: Comprehensive life cycle assessment of fluid milk delivery
systems, 8th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment
in the Agri-Food sector, Saint-Malo, France, Oct. 1-4, 2012
11. Recommendations For Improvement
In Supply Chain Impact
• Container
– Container weight reduction, especially in on-the-go systems.
– Improved use of distribution packaging that can be used many times.
– Reduce energy use which improves multiple impact category effects.
• Processing plant
– Energy efficiency would directly lower impact to climate change and
costs.
– Water use and wastewater reduction in processing plant which will
affect eutrophication mitigation, and cost reduction.
– Avoid sewage overload which is the main contributor to nitrogen
emission to water and cause of eutrophication.
– Evaluate wastewater treatment discharges for potential reduction in
human toxicity, and eco toxicity, cost savings.
– Optimize out-of-date (from distribution and retail center) milk return
and use as feed.
Source: Principles of a measurement framework: application to processing and
packaging technologies. Institute of Food Technologists
Annual Meeting and Food Expo, Las Vegas, NV, June 27, 2012
12. Study 1: Light-Weighting Through
Container Design
12% weight savings through optimized
design alone
Source: Uniloy
13. Study 2: Adding Calcium Carbonate As A Filler
• Recycling recovery rate of 99% with CaCO3 levels
up to 8%.
• CaCO3 compounded in a master batch, doesn't
require changes to equipment except for the
addition of a material blender.
Source: Uniloy and Omya
14. Study 3: Light-Weighting + Optimizing
For Calcium Carbonate Filler
• Required optimizing
design to regain top
load e.g.
– Tucked in handle.
– Ribs on bottom and
shoulder.
• 54g bottle possible.
Source: Uniloy
15. Future Possibilities – Adding Recycled
Content
• Arla UK’s bottles already
made of 15% rHDPE.
• Bottles made with 50%
post-consumer recycled
content will be produced
at Arla's new Aylesbury
dairy.
Source: Arla Foods, Plastics Today
16. Future Possibilities – Using Bio-Resins
• Bio-plastics are plastics
made using ethanol
from renewable
resources such as
sugarcane and corn or
crop waste.
• Any grade of HDPE or
LDPE can be made using
the biopolymer.
• Up to 30% bio-resin
content envisaged.
17. Recipe For Tomorrow’s Gallon Jug?
• For a 56g gallon
jug:
– 29.7g virgin HDPE
reduces the
amount of virgin
HDPE by more
than 50%!
– 16.8 grams
biopolymer.
– 5.6 grams rHDPE.
– 3.9 grams calcium
carbonate.
Today’s gallon jug
18. “Integrated Design” Is The Next
Frontier
• Using the minimum input and getting maximum
use of materials at the end.
• Can only come about by the value chain working
together:
– Raw materials suppliers.
– Equipment manufacturers, e.g. of blow molding
equipment.
– Distribution equipment manufacturers, e.g. of crate
packing equipment.
– Processors/brand owners.
– Retailers.