1. Adequate Yearly Progress 2011-12
Annual Report and Public Hearing
Georgetown ISD
February 26, 2013

2. Measures Evaluated
• Reading/ELA
– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in
Reading/ELA
– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Reading/ELA
• Math
– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Math
– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Math
• Other
– Attendance Rate
• For elementary and middle school campuses
• Districts not offering 12th grade
– Graduation Rate
• For high school campuses
• Districts offering 12th grade

5. Standards for Performance
% Proficient
100 %
93
87 92 of students
80
83 must pass
Reading 73
75 in 2014
Math 67
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

6. Student Groups Evaluated
Performance Participation Other Indicator
Accountability Subset All Students Enrolled Attendance & Graduation
• All Students Group • All Students Group • All Students Group
• African American* • African American* • African American*
• Hispanic* • Hispanic* • Hispanic*
• White* • White* • White*
• Econ. Disadvantaged* • Econ. Disadvantaged* • Econ. Disadvantaged*
• Special Education* • Special Education* • Special Education*
• Limited English Proficient* • Limited English Proficient* • Limited English Proficient*
* Provided that these groups meet the Minimum Size Requirement
< 50 = Not Evaluated | ≥ 200 = Always Evaluated | 50-199 = Evaluated if equal to at least 10% of the All Student group

7. AYP Status Labels
• Meets AYP
• Missed AYP – (Reason)
Reasons include:
• Reading (Proficiency and/or Participation)
• Mathematics (Proficiency and/or Participation)
• Attendance Rate
• Graduation Rate

8. 2012 AYP Report Overview
Page One
Performance: Reading/ELA (AYP Target: 87%)
• Reading Performance, 2011-2012
– Used to demonstrate proficiency
• Reading Performance, 2010-2011
– Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor)

9. 2012 AYP Report Overview
Page Two
Performance: Mathematics (AYP Target: 83%)
• Math Performance, 2011-2012
– Used to demonstrate proficiency
• Math Performance, 2010-2011
– Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor)

10. 2012 AYP Report Overview
Page Three
Participation: Reading/ELA & Mathematics
(AYP Target: 95%)
• Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2011-2012
– Used to demonstrate participation
• Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2010-2011
– Used to calculate 2 year average, if needed

11. 2012 AYP Report Overview
Page Four
Graduation Rate (AYP Target: 75%) or Attendance Rate
(AYP Target: 90%)
• Graduation Rate (Class of 2011) or Attendance Rate
(2010-11 School Year)
– Used to calculate whether or not the campus or district
met the target rate
• Graduation Rate (Class of 2010) or Attendance Rate
(2009-10 School Year)
– Used to demonstrate improvement
• 5-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate (Class of 2010)

12. 2012 AYP Report Overview
Page Five
AYP Explanation Table:
• Summarizes the results of the AYP report
• + Meets AYP
• – Not Evaluated
• % Missed AYP due to 2% and/or 1% federal caps
• X Missed AYP

13. Sample: Page 5 from GISD AYP Report

14. Final 2012 AYP Results
Georgetown ISD: Missed AYP –
Reading (Performance) & Math (Performance), Stage 1
Campus Name 2012 Status Stage
Georgetown High School Meets AYP None
Richarte High School Meets AYP None
East View High School Missed AYP: Math Performance None
Benold Middle School Meets AYP None
Tippit Middle School Missed AYP: Reading Performance & Math Performance Stage 1
Forbes Middle School Meets AYP None
Purl Elementary Meets AYP None
Carver Elementary Meets AYP None
Frost Elementary Meets AYP None
Cooper Elementary Missed AYP: Reading Performance None
Pickett Elementary Meets AYP None
McCoy Elementary Missed AYP: Reading Performance & Math Performance None
Village Elementary Meets AYP None
Williams Elementary Missed AYP: Reading Performance None
Ford Elementary Meets AYP None
Mitchell Elementary Meets AYP None

15. 2012 AYP Performance: Georgetown ISD
Reading/English Language Arts (Grades 3-8 & 10)
100
90
80
Met Standard
70
2012 Standard
60 (87%)
50 96 2013 Standard
92 87 87 (93%)
86
40 79
73
30
Met Required
20 Improvement
10
0
All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP

16. 2012 AYP Performance: Georgetown ISD
Mathematics (Grades 3-8 & 10)
100
90
80
Met Standard
70
2012 Standard
60 (83%)
50 2013 Standard
90 94 (92%)
40 79 84 84 84
69
30
20
10
0
All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP
Did Not Meet Minimum Size Req.

17. 2012 AYP Participation: Georgetown ISD
Reading/English Language Arts (Grades 3-8 & 10)
100
90
80
70
60
Participation Rate
50
40 Standard
30
20
10
0
All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP

18. 2012 AYP Participation: Georgetown ISD
Mathematics (Grades 3-8 & 10)
100
90
80
70
60
Participation Rate
50
40 Standard
30
20
10
0
All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP

19. 2012 AYP Graduation Rate: Georgetown ISD
Four-Year Longitudinal Cohort: Class of 2011
100
90
80
Graduation Rate
70
60
50 AYP Target (75%)
89.6 93.8
40 80.6 82.5 84
68.2
30 56.8
20
10
0
All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP
Did Not Meet Minimum Size Requirements

20. Accessing AYP Reports
• TEA Website:
http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/2012/index.html
• GISD Website:
http://www.georgetownisd.org/Page/78
• GISD Campuses & GISD Administration Building
• GISD Assessment Department, (512) 943-5000
– Becky McCoy, Assessment Director, ext. 6034
mccoyr@georgetownisd.org
– Denise Gunn, Assessment Secretary, ext. 6098
gunnd@georgetownisd.org