This document describes Hanan Naser's research estimating and forecasting Bahrain's quarterly GDP using simple regression and factor models. It finds that a simple regression model augmented with intercept correction provided the most reliable estimates. Several models were able to shorten the lag in official GDP estimates by one week. The research adapts forecasting techniques used for developed countries to the case of Bahrain as an oil-producing developing country.
4. Estimating
and
Forecasting
Bahrain
Quarterly
GDP
Hanan Naser
Outline
Introduction
Model
Data
Empirical Work
Results
Conclusion
Introduction
Motivation
Simple Regression Approach :
(Trehan (1992,1996), Parigi & Schlitzer (1995), Bovi et al (2000). Camba-
Mendez et al (2001), Irac & Sedillot (2002) and Mourougma & Roma (2002))
Factor Based Model:
(Stock and Watson (1998,2002a, 2002b), Forni and Reichlin (1998), Forni,
Lippi, Hallin and Reichlin (2001a)).
Size and the composition of the data and its impact on factor
estimates Boivin and Ng (2006).
To date, the majority of empirical studies on early estimates of
GDP have focused on developed countries such as UK, USA and
Euro area.
4 / 19
6. Estimating
and
Forecasting
Bahrain
Quarterly
GDP
Hanan Naser
Outline
Introduction
Model
Data
Empirical Work
Results
Conclusion
Model
Simple Regression Model
∆yt = c + Σp
i=1αi∆yt−i + Σp
i=0Σk
j=1βixt−i, j + ut (1)
yt ⇒ log of Bahrain GDP
xi,j ⇒ j-th indicator variable (j=1,2,.....k) in logs
c ⇒ intercept
p ⇒ number of lags
∆ ⇒ 1st difference operator
ut ⇒ disturbance ∼ N(0, σ2)
All possible combinations of the q = k(p + 1) + p indicators are used as possible models.
This leads to the constructions of s
i=1
q!
(q−i)!i!
possible models which is 1159 models in
our case
6 / 19
14. Estimating
and
Forecasting
Bahrain
Quarterly
GDP
Hanan Naser
Outline
Introduction
Model
Data
Empirical Work
Results
Conclusion
Empirical Work and Results
Evaluating Forecast Performance
Evaluating point forecast using root mean square forecast
error RMSFE, residual standard deviation (RSD) and
Pesaran and Timmerman (1992) test.
Utilize the corrected Diebold Mariano (1995) test of Harvey
et al (1997), to evaluate weather two different forecast
models are significantly different from each other or not
using models loss function.
Evaluation of density forecasts using Diebold et al (1998)
test based on probability integral transform (PIT). Testing
standard normality of the cumulative density function (CDF)
using Doornik and Hansen (1994) (DH) test as suggested by
Clements and Smith (2000) and examin independence in the
PIT using Ljung- Box test .
14 / 19
18. Estimating
and
Forecasting
Bahrain
Quarterly
GDP
Hanan Naser
Outline
Introduction
Model
Data
Empirical Work
Results
Conclusion
Conclusion
Conclusion
The most reliable estimates achieved using simple regression
estimates augmented with intercept correction mode
(3IV/IC). However, it can be considered only if the forecaster
concern about the point forecast.
3IV and SIV/IC are good choices and pass point and density
forecasts.
We can shorten the lag of the official estimates by one week.
Our results support Boivin and Ng (2006) argument, which
says that more information does not always help to produce
more accurate results.
18 / 19