Doorontwikkeling van mijn regels en principes verhaal. Gegeven voor INHolland Show and Share 2009 in Rotterdam. 20x20 seconden versie.

1. 1 Kind

2. 2 Kind

3. 3 Kind

4. 4 Ik

5. Makkelijk omzeilbaar Reactief Controleren Dekken een punt af 5 Regels

6. Vergen nadenken Proactief Dekken een vlak af Leiden 6 Principes

7. 7 Intentionally left blank. I used an overhead projector to show the difference between rules and principles by filling a square (span of control) with a lot of little dots (rules, easy but tedious to do) and about 10 pieces of a puzzle (harder, you have to think, remains a challenge). Afterwards I show that a small change in the square (span of control) would mean a lot of rules to be changed and very little principles.

8. 8 Intentionally left blank. I used an overhead projector to show the difference between rules and principles by filling a square (span of control) with a lot of little dots (rules, easy but tedious to do) and about 10 pieces of a puzzle (harder, you have to think, remains a challenge). Afterwards I show that a small change in the square (span of control) would mean a lot of rules to be changed and very little principles.

9. 9 Intentionally left blank. I used an overhead projector to show the difference between rules and principles by filling a square (span of control) with a lot of little dots (rules, easy but tedious to do) and about 10 pieces of a puzzle (harder, you have to think, remains a challenge). Afterwards I show that a small change in the square (span of control) would mean a lot of rules to be changed and very little principles.

10. 10 Intentionally left blank. I used an overhead projector to show the difference between rules and principles by filling a square (span of control) with a lot of little dots (rules, easy but tedious to do) and about 10 pieces of a puzzle (harder, you have to think, remains a challenge). Afterwards I show that a small change in the square (span of control) would mean a lot of rules to be changed and very little principles.

11. 11 Intentionally left blank. I used an overhead projector to show the difference between rules and principles by filling a square (span of control) with a lot of little dots (rules, easy but tedious to do) and about 10 pieces of a puzzle (harder, you have to think, remains a challenge). Afterwards I show that a small change in the square (span of control) would mean a lot of rules to be changed and very little principles.

12. 12 Intentionally left blank. I used an overhead projector to show the difference between rules and principles by filling a square (span of control) with a lot of little dots (rules, easy but tedious to do) and about 10 pieces of a puzzle (harder, you have to think, remains a challenge). Afterwards I show that a small change in the square (span of control) would mean a lot of rules to be changed and very little principles.

13. 13 Bijvoorbeeld Wegenverkeerswet 1994 (Tekst geldend op: 17-06-2008)‏ Artikel 2 1. De krachtens deze wet vastgestelde regels kunnen strekken tot: a. het verzekeren van de veiligheid op de weg; b. het beschermen van weggebruikers en passagiers; c. het in stand houden van de weg en het waarborgen van de bruikbaarheid daarvan; d. het zoveel mogelijk waarborgen van de vrijheid van het verkeer. Wet

14. 14 Waarom

15. 15 Zelf?

16. 16 Professional

17. 17 Expliciet

18. 18 Bewust

20. 20 Waarom in principe regels overbodig zijn