Presentasi JPIK dalam Chatham House yang dilaksanakan pada 7-8 Februari 2013 di London UK

1. Experience from Indonesia:
The Independent Forest Monitoring
Network (JPIK)
Zainuri Hasyim
21st Illegal Logging Stakeholder Update
Chatham House, 7 February 2013

2.  JPIK = Indonesia Independent Monitoring
for SVLK (Indonesia TLAS)
 Network of NGOs and indigenous/local
peoples.
 Established in September 2009 by 29 NGOs
from 21 provinces
 1 National Coordinator, 24 Provincial
Focal Points, 5 board of trustees
 Members: 41 NGOs + 259 individual (as
January 2013)

4.  Code of conduct & Working Standard
for Monitoring (accreditation,
certification, and system review)
 Capacity building
 Monitoring of Indonesia TLAS
implementation
 Complaint & Input to Accreditation
Body, Auditor Body, and MoF

5.  NGO’s and Indigenous peoples stated
as Independent Monitoring (IM/IFM)
 IM/IFM is Key to ensure credibility
of SVLK
 NGO’s and Indigenous peoples
monitoring process accreditation,
process audit and implementation
regulation
 Recognition by the rule

6. Government
Accreditatio Independent
n Body Monitoring
accreditation keluhan
(melalui
Audit Body pemantau
an)
verification Export Licence
Auditee
Verification Inspection
Forest Export
Industry
/Timber source license

7. Monitoring
prev records 1 or 2 years
VLK (legality)
SFM (included legality) AUDIT Surveilllances
5 years Audit Result
Monitoring in
Monitoring Pre audit
Audit and 1 2 3
surveilla
First Audit nces
Monitoring

8.  IM/IFM submit information to the Auditor
for strengthen the process of audit
 IM/IFM propose complaint(s) to:
 Audit Body, related audit
process/results of audit
 Accreditation Body, related
accreditation process/ results of
accreditation and the performance of
Audit Body
 IM/IFM propose the review the regulations
based on practices for system improvement

9.  Recognition by rule vs stakeholders
acceptable
 Information transparency
 Complaint handling mechanism
 Improvement of system performance

10.  Recognition by rule vs stakeholders
acceptable
 Information transparency
 Complaint handling mechanism
 Improvement of system performance