2. Who’s who? Exeter Community Palliative Care Team: Jane Oliver Beth Daw Rebecca Meyrick Freddy James – GSF in Nursing Homes Kerry Macnish – Education Manager Tim Harlow
4. Why Advanced Care Planning?(ACP) Around half a million people die each year. 2/3rds are over 75yrs & die from chronic illnesses such as heart disease, cancer, CVA, COPD, neurological disease & dementia. 58% of deaths occur in Hospital, 18% at home, 17% in Care homes, 4% Hospices, 3% elsewhere. (DH, 2008)
9. Equity of Care Every individual approaching EoL irrespective of diagnosis, age, gender, ethnicity, religious belief, socioeconomic background, disability, sexual orientation should receive high quality EoL care. (DOH, 2008). Whatever the care setting, whether home, hospital, care home, hospice or elsewhere.
15. Advance Care Planning “ Caring for people at the end of their lives is an important role for many health and social care professionals. One of the key aspects of this role is to discuss with individuals their preferences regarding the type of care they receive and where they wish to be cared for” (Mike Richards 2007)
16. What is Advance Care Planning? ACP is a process of discussion between an individual and their care providers irrespective of discipline The difference between ACP and general care planning is ACP usually takes place in the context of an anticipated deterioration in the individual’s condition in the future Preferred Priorities of care (PPC) is the documentation used to record an advance care plan
24. Hope and ACP Information leads to less fear and more control Helps maintain relationships, preserve normality, reduce feelings of being a burden. Encourages a sense of being in control, empowered and enabled. ACP can enhance HOPE not diminish it
26. Focus Identify the timing to instigate ACP Presenting Opportunities/triggers. Basic Communication skills/strategies in conversations.
27. Indentification of EoL Many with chronic illness(s) reach a point where it is evident they are going to die from their condition. Other conditions it can be difficult to accurately predict. Gold Standards Framework Prognostic indicators (GSF, 2008) provides guidance.
28. Cancer High Function GP’s Workload Ave 20 Deaths per GP per year Low Time Organ Failure High Function Low Time Fraility/Dementia High Function Low Time Taken from GSF Prognostic Indicator guide 2008
29. The ‘triggers’ The surprise question: would you be surprised if this individual were to die within 6 – 12months? - ‘gut instinct’ Clinical Indicators of Advancing Disease , i.e. Reduced physical performance, frequent admissions to hospital/out of hours services. An individual opts for comfort measures /opts out of curative treatment .
30. triggers to consider Referral to Specialist Palliative Care team. Following diagnosis of a life limiting condition ie. MND, advanced cancer, dementia. At instigation of DS1500. At an assessment of an individuals needs, complex care package, carer distress, respite care. Admission to a care home.
44. Advanced Decision to Refuse Treatment Rebecca Meyrick Community Cluster Team Leader Exeter Hospiscare
45. Mental Capacity Act – Implications for ADRT Empowerment for adults who lack capacity Protection for adults who lack capacity and those who care for them Choice - by allowing people to appoint those they trust to make decisions for them
56. Assessing capacity Does the person have an impairment of, or a disturbance of, their mind or brain? Does the impairment or disturbance mean that the person is unable to make a specific decision when they need to?
57. Four tests Can they understand the information? Can they retain the information? (only needs to be for long enough to allow them to use and weigh up the information) Can they use and weigh up the information? (ie. Can they consider benefits and burdens?) Can they communicate their decision?
58.
59. If binding, the person has taken responsibility for the decision
67. So what does this mean for you? Where are you with GSF? What are the current barriers and challenges for you? Suggestions for improvement of ACP in Primary Care?
68. Current Problems with ACP and CPR Both professionals and the public understanding of CPR and its success rate remains misunderstood Some patients are having CPR attempted inappropriately and as a result death can be undignified and traumatic Dying patients are being transferred back to hospital when their preferred place of death is home Patients wishes and preferences are not always clarified and respected (advance decisions to refuse treatment) Good communication and consistent documentation is variable All care settings including ambulance service have their own documentation to record DNAR
71. Clarify that patients and relevant others will not be asked to decide about CPR when clinicians are as sure as they can be that CPR would not be successful and therefore is not a treatment option
Point 2 In patients who are generally weak, who are gradually deteriorating and in whom there are a number of medical problems, then the chance of resuscitation being successful is extremely low (<1%). Dr’s will sometimes decide that offering resus is inappropriate as it would be extremely unlikely to lead to a return to reasonable quality of life. It may also be felt that discussing this may cause distress.