This is one of the presentations at the 1st day of "Technical Exchange on Jurisdictional REDD". See more at: http://www.idesam.org.br/technical-exchange-on-jurisdictional-redd-presentations/

2. 732.793 inhabitants
164.221 km2
87 % forest cover
47 % as Protected Natural Areas
State of Acre

4. Sustainable Development Strategy
Provision of Environmental Services
Economic development
Environment
Improvement the quality of Life of the Acrean Population

5. Lei Nº 2.308 de 22 de outubro de 2010
State System of Incentives for Environmental
Services

6. National Strategy
Acre - Subnational Strategy
Institute of Climate
Change
Company of Environmental
Services Development
CCTMA
CFE
CDRFS
CEVA
OMBUDSMAN
SCIENTIFFIC
COMMITTEE
WORKING
GROUPS
PROGRAM A
Sub-program A Sub-program B Sub-program A
INVESTORS
PROVIDERS
P - A P - B P - BP - A P - BP - A
Institutional Framework

7. Nested
Aproach
Project
A
Project
B
Project
C
Project
n
Project
A
Project
B
Project
C
Project
n
Project
A
Project
B
Project
C
Project
n
Project
A
Project
B
Project
C
Project
n
It is a jurisdictional
subnational program:
Needs to predict their
future integration into
a national strategy

8. Assumptions to define the Baseline
1. The objective: to reduce emissions from deforestation,
forest degradation and sustainable management of natural
resources;
2. Jurisdictional program ≠ large scale project,
3. It is subnacional: needs to be integrated in the national
strategy
4. Knowledge: historic of deforestation, national and state
biomass stimative, forest degradation and removals are not
available (yet);
5. Drive of deforestation = demand for agriculture and cattle,
while of forest degradation = demand for wood: we can use
two baselines for each activity;
6. We can implement the program in phases;

9. Historical baseline:
Parameter: deforestation
Fonte: IPAM, 2012
182 Mt CO2
202 Mt CO2
✔

10. Salimon
Biomassa= 123
ton/ha
Baccini
Biomassa = 131
ton/ha
130 TC/ha
✔
Historical baseline:
Parameter: biomass

11. 0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400 1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Desmtamento(km2)
Desmatamento (km2)
Desmatamento (km2)
Acre Reference Level
Fonte: INPE (2012)
1st
Phase
2nd
Phase

12. 0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Desmtamento(km2)
Desmatamento (km2) Desmatamento reduzido (km2)
Linha de base jurisdicional para o primeiro período de
creditação (2006-2010)
First Phase: Early actions (2006 – 2010)
• Investments starting
before this period
• Official Data of
deforestation from
PRODES/INPE are
processed to avoid
clouds: continuous
series of data =
more observation by
year
• Fractals model to
spatialize the
baseline
• Biomass by pixel

13. Second Phase: From the Programa was cerated by
law (2011 – 2020)
Official Data of deforestation from
PRODES/INPE
Minimum area mapped: 6 ha
Historical data: 1996 – 2005
Projected to 2020
Carbon stock: 123 tons/ha (131 ton/ha)
Emission factor: 367 tCO2e/ha
Federal approach

14. Leakage
Brasil: Amazonas e Rondônia
Peru: Ucayali e Madre de Dios
Bolívia: Pando
Mapeamento dos
desmatamentos ocorridos
nos anos de 1988, 1994,
2000, 2005 e 2010

15. THINKING beyond the canopy
Nested System of Monitoring
Foto:DiegoGurgel
National
State
Project
- Climate Change National Plan
- Targets at national level: PPCD – AM
- INPE regular database – Resolution = 6,25 ha
- Targets at state level: PPCD – AC
- UCEGEO’s database– Resolution = 0,54 ha
- INPE regular database – Resolution = 6,25 ha
- Targets at Project level
- UCEGEO’s databse – Resolution = 4 and 2.5 m
- Laser – LiDar
- Aerial photograph – Pixel 25 cm
- Field data

16. Using REDD+SES in
Acre State
The SISA and its programs such as IES Carbon
Program, are instruments to achieve sustainable
development
REDD+ SES:
• instrument to report and communicate the
impacts and results of the SISA
• Instrument to monitoring the Brazilian
safeguards and the principles of the Law of
SISA.
• bring the main points to pay attention
regarding to safeguards and needs for
regulation
• instrument of the Councils and the
Commission for Monitoring and Validation to
develop their work

17. Benefit Sharing

18. Final Considerations
• Focus on jurisdictional program versus project perspective: change the model of
economic development (versus conservation policy)
– Economic growth with human development and conservation of natural
resources
– Value the forest through the consolidation of forest based economy
– REDD+ is one more instrument inside of a broader state policy for sustainable
development
• The technical aspects, institutional and legal framework of a jurisdictional REDD+
program need to address these challenges.
• Next steps:
– Finish the pre-assessment regarding to the VCS jurisdictional requirements (TUV SUD)
– Validation of the program through the VCS jurisdictional requirements (TUV SUD, IPAM,
IMC, LUDOVINO LOPES AND FGV)
– Still planning: work on leakage and risk assessment
– Procedures for nested projects

19. Alianzas…
Solutions for environment and development
Soluciones para el ambiente y desarrollo