1. Every Trainee Matters / 2010-1-ROI-LE004-0677111
Every Trainee Matters
Evaluation Feedback
Prague 21th – 22th June 2012
Leonardo Da Vinci – Partnership
George Stefas
Strategic Management Unit
3. Purpose
Internal Evaluation process
• Improve capacity
– Staff
– Organication’s operation
• Better implementation of future projects
• Improve managers capacity in project management
• Lessons learned, deal with problems or obstacles
• Assist the final report
• Provide added value to the project
4.
5. • Were the language competencies of your
organisation taken into account?
• Did you find all topics relevant during the
project meetings?
• Did you agree with the initial strategy
developed and proposed?
• Did the LP provided efficient support and
expertise so as to ensure quality
implementation of the training tasks and
consequently improvement of the
participating institutions?
6. Were you able to contribute to the same extent as the other project
partners?
yes no
17%
83%
7. Were all relevant information available in due time?
Availability of relevant information
29%
yes
no
71%
8. Were all the Coordinators in the different partner institutions authorized
to take decisions?
Decision making
43%
yes
no
57%
9. Do you agree with the dissemination actions of the project results?
Dissemination actions
29%
yes
no
71%
• Some wanted less dissemination
• Some did not make any dissemination
10. Please rate the quality of the portfolio made.
Rating of the quality of the portfolio made
5
4 4 4
3 3
1 2 3 4 5 6
• Average: 3.8
11. How would you rate the motivational accelerator applied by the project
coordinator.
Rating of the motivational accelator applied by project coordinator
5 5 5 5
4
3
1 2 3 4 5 6
• Average: 4.5
12.
13. • Did you find clear the division of tasks
between the project partners?
• Would you describe the workplan and
timetable clear?
• Was there a clear distribution of
responsibilities among the project
partners?
• Did you believe you had your saying in the
decision-making procedure?
• Did you find the contribution of your
organisation to be valued?
• Would you choose to cooperate again with
the Project coordinator?
14. Do you have a clear view of the main goals and results being aimed at?
View of the goals & results
17%
yes
no
83%
• More explanation required
15.
16. • Did the project coordinator respected the
deadlines?
• Were the technical communication levels
of all project partners taken into account?
17. During the project implementation did you have in your possession a
timetable?
Possession of a timetable
yes no
33%
67%
18. Please rate the clearness timetable of activities for your organisation in
the context of the project.
Clearness of timetable
5 5
4 4
3
2
1 2 3 4 5 6
• Average: 3.8
19. Please rate the means and frequency of communication among the
partnership?
Rating of the means and frequency of communication among the
partnership
6 5
5 4
4 4
3 3
2 3
1 4
• Average: 3.8
20.
21. How do you rate the overall professional development impact through
the training approach?
Overall professional development impact
5 5 5
4
3 3
1 2 3 4 5 6
• Average: 4.2
22. To what extent were you able to contribute to the online training course
according to your strategic goals as an organisation?
Contribution to the training course
5 5
4 4
3 3
• Average: 4.0 1 2 3 4 5 6
23. In what level were you able to develop skills team work for the activity of
the training approach?
Level of team work skills developed
5 5
4 4
3 3
• Average: 4.0 1 2 3 4 5 6
24. In what level were you able to develop communication skills in English
through the training courses?
Level of English communication skills developed
5 5
4 4 4
3
• Average: 4.2 1 2 3 4 5 6
25. Please rate the communication between the participants and trainers
during the lifetime of the testing period?
Rating of the communication among the participants and trainers
4 4 4 4
3 3
• Average: 3.7
1 2 3 4 5 6
26. How would you rate the quality of the produced training material in
comparison to the initial aim?
Rating of the quality of the training material
6 5
5 5
4 5
3 4
2 2
1 4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
• Average: 4.2
27. In what level is the training material appropriate for the participants of
the testing (meeting the needs of the testers)?
Meeting the needs of the testers
5
5 5
4
2 2
1 2
3
4
5
6
• Average: 3.8
28. In what level would you rate the valorisation and use of ICT in the
training approach?
Rating of the valorisation and the use of ICT
6 4
5 5
4 5
3 3
2 3
4
• Average: 4.0 1
29. Please rate the level of digital literacy promoted through the training
methodology
Rating of the level of digital literacy promoted in this training
approach
5
4 4
3 3
2
• Average: 3.5 1 2 3 4 5 6
30. Did your organisation reach the targeted number of testers?
Did the targeted number of testers were reached?
yes no
17%
83%
31. Based on the grade reports of your participants, what was the level of
achievement?
Level of achievement
4 4 4
3 3
2
• Average: 3.3 1 2 3 4 5 6
32. Please rate the level of participation of your trainees?
Level of trainees' participation
6 5
5 2
4 3
3 3
2 2
1 3
33. In what level did the functions of the e-platform meet your expectations
(effectiveness)?
Effectiveness of the platform's functions
5 5 5
4
3
2
1 2 3 4 5 6
34. Did the training program provide the necessary motivation to the
participants to complete the courses?
Did the programme provide enough motivation to participants to complete
the courses?
yes no
17%
83%
35. What impact did the partnership had on the pupils/learners/trainees? (1/2)
Linguistic skills Increased ICT skills
5 5 5 5
4
3
3 3 3
2
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
Increased vocational skills
Increased social skills
4
5 5
3 3
4 5
2 2
3 3
2 2
1 3
1 2 3 4 5
36. What impact did the partnership had on the pupils/learners/trainees? (2/2)
Increased motivation Increased self-confidence
4 4
5 4 3 3
2
4 3
3 3
2 3
1 2 3 4 5
1 4
Other (Pupil-Other)
Increased knowledge about the partner
countries and cultures
3 3
5
4
3 3 2 3
2
1 3
1 2 3 4 5
37. • Did the overall training approach gave
motivation to the participants to engage in
lifelong learning activities, according to
your knowledge?
• Would you valorise again the same e-
platform for training purposes?
38. Based on the communication with your participants, do you think the
training program increased or decreased their self-confidence?
Self confidence of participants
yes no
17%
83%
39. In what level do you find the e-platform effective?
Level of platform's effectiveness
5 5
4 5
3 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
40. Please evaluate the correlation (value) between resources provided for
the production of the training material and the final quality portfolio
(set of online training courses)
Correlation between resourses and quality portfolio
6 4
5 4
4 4
3 3
2 3
1 5
41. Please rate the visibility of the institution and training program created
in the partnership?
Visibility of institution and training programme
5 5
4 4
3
2
1 2 3 4 5 6
42.
43. To what extent were results/products/outcomes previously identified at
application stage achieved?
Extent of achievement of results/products/outcomes/
previously identified in application form
5 5
4 4 4
2
1 2 3 4 5 6
44. To what extent were the aims/objectives previously stated at application
stage achieved?
Extent of achievement of aims /goals previously stated in application
form
6 5
5 5
4 3
3 4
2 3
1 5
45. To what extent were the planned activities previously stated at
application stage achieved?
Extent of achievement of planned activities
5 5
4 4 4
3
1 2 3 4 5 6
46. What impact did the partnership have on the teachers/staff? (1/2)
Increased language skills Increased ICT skills
5 5
4 5
3 4 4
3 3
2 2 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Increased motivation Increased training skills
5
6 5 4 4
5 4 3 3
4 2
3 3
2 2
1 5
1 2 3 4 5
47. What impact did the partnership have on the teachers/staff? (2/2)
Increased project management skills Increased knowledge about partner countries and
5 cultures
4 4 4
3 3 6 5
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 4
Other-Staff
3 3
1 2
48. Do you believe you have informed your organisation / other
organisations / the local community of the results of the partnership?
Notification of other organization/local community about the results of
this partnership
yes no
17%
83%
49. Do you think that the outcomes of the partnership could be used by
others?
