SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  25
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
By Vuk Gavrilović
What is a review?
 A review is a permanent document you create in the
 Judge Center.
 In consists of you evaluation of another judge, you’re
 recognizing the good work of another judge and
 giving advise on how to improve.
 The documents is broken down in “strenghts” and
 “areas of improvement”
How to create a review in the
Judge Center…
 Log in into the JC and click “reviews”
How to create a review in the
Judge Center…
 Click on “create”, select “evaluation” and click on
 “continue”.
How to create a review in the
Judge Center…
 Top of page -find the judge you want to review, and
 insert all the data relevant to the tournament.
How to create a review in the
Judge Center…
 Year issue: select year 2010
 Remember to write “This is a 2012 review” in the
 comment box
What is the purpose of a review?
 Recognize the good job a judge did.
 To give advice on how to improve!
 A pair of “extra eyes” from outside – no one can
 improve much all by himself/herself.
 Share our expertise and mentor.
 Write what someone could improve.
 Ultimately: improve the Judge Program as a whole.
Important!
     The main purpose of a review is to be helpful!
It should help the judge to realize his/her mistakes and
             give advice on how to improve.

           It is not an exam. No one “fails”.

It should be useful and a source of information on how
     to improve and do an even better job next time!
Writing a review helps you as well!
 It helps you develop your observation and mentoring
 skills.

 It will also show that you’re involved actively in the
 judge community. (Not only the reviewed judge can
 read the reviews you write…)

 It’s part of the checklist…
Choose your words wisely!
 Be tactful and diplomatic.
 Be careful not to offend someone.
 Keep in mind cultural differences and language
 barrier!
 Don’t use irony or sarcasm – it won’t work…
 Try to give constructive criticism.
Be very specific in the review
 Write down exactly in what situation you observed a
 given thing.
 Write the role you and the judge had.
 Put all the details relevant to the situation you’re
 describing.
 Justify your point of view.
How to observe:
 Shadowing (especially if “buddy system” is
 implemented).
 Chat – except for real situations, talk about
 hypothetical ones (“what do you think about…”, “what
 would you do in this case…”)
 Work together (example: do a deck check together…)
What to observe:
 Interaction with players and judges
 General preparation in rules and policies
 Approach and attitude towards judging and players
 Execution of assigned tasks (remember to write what
 tasks exactly you’re talking about)
“Role oriented” reviews
 A review doesn’t need to contain every aspect of
 judging. It can be quite short and specific to a role.

Example:
  You can review your TL (even if you’re a L1),
  considering only the team leading aspects of that
  particualar judge in that tournament.
Things to remember…

      Take notes during the tournament.

They will help you remember what to write after a few days.
Things to remember…
   If you want to get a review ask for it!

       (usually to your “buddy” or TL on a GP,
   or the HJ on a smaller tournament like a PTQ)
Things to remember…
   You can review a judge of any level!

                    Don’t be shy,
   even if they are high level they are not perfect!
                 …except for Kalle ☺
Things to remember…
 Language barrier and cultural differences.

     English is preferred language for judge reviews,
  but if it’s not good enough better write in your native
       language (if the reviewed judge also speaks it).
Things to remember…
           Avoid absolute statements

 Don’t say “John IS…” if you observed a thing only
 once.
 Avoid words like “always” and “never”.

By their nature, absolute statements are bound to be
 false and inncaurate.
Things to remember…
    You can write a review to a judge that
               performed well.

You don’t need to wait for a judge to do something “wrong”.
Even if a judge does a great job, there are surely ways he or
           she can do an outstanding job next time!

  Even if there’s nothing you can think of as “area of
      improvements” – write the review anyway!
Things to remember…
Before you write the review, talk to the judge
          about what you observed.

 This is important: it will help you get a better idea on the
                     judge’s performance.
    And sometimes it will avoid you some mistakes or
                         inaccuracies.
Things to remember…
If don’t get the chance to talk in person – use
   some other mean (emails, Facebook, JC…)

It’s important to exchange opinions and have some sort of
                           debriefing.
 Sometimes it won’t be possible at the tournament, so feel
                  free to do it electronically.
Your first review
 Don’t be afraid to write one. It’s normal, everyone does it.
 Review a judge you know and have worked with on several
 occasions (this should be less intimidanting than
 reviewing a judge you just met for the first time on a GP).
 Talk to the judge before writing the review.
 It doesn’t have to be an outstanding review. It can be
 short and schematic. It will still be useful.

 Good reviews come with time. Don’t expect to be perfect
 immediately. Everyone needs practice and experience.
You got a bad review. What now?
 Don’t get depressed. Don’t take it personally.

 Learn from it and try to do your best next time.

 Be happy about it! You now have something to work
 on and become a better judge!
Examples:
 Even if you have arrived in the staff of the tournament in run for
 before thing you have tried to visualize the situation to try to
 improve what it was necessary.
 Your figure during the whole tournament has been at the most
 of the professionalism her your knowledge of the policies it is
 excellent and I would wish me to always work with people of
 your preparation.
 The only note that can move you is that at times your ways can
 seem hard as if you had always become rabid with whom is you
 before.
 I note this during the "Legacy@National" Tournament

Contenu connexe

En vedette

Computacion: Slideshare y Flickr
Computacion: Slideshare y FlickrComputacion: Slideshare y Flickr
Computacion: Slideshare y FlickrJordy Fernando
 
State based actions
State based actionsState based actions
State based actionsIva
 
question 2
question 2question 2
question 2Simikap
 
Layers: The interaction of continuous effects - Joel Nerenberg
Layers: The interaction of continuous effects - Joel NerenbergLayers: The interaction of continuous effects - Joel Nerenberg
Layers: The interaction of continuous effects - Joel NerenbergIva
 
Level5 unit2 lesson1_galileo
Level5 unit2 lesson1_galileoLevel5 unit2 lesson1_galileo
Level5 unit2 lesson1_galileoeldar19071991
 
Objectification presentation
Objectification presentationObjectification presentation
Objectification presentationCore5Oman
 
How to give rulings
How to give rulingsHow to give rulings
How to give rulingsIva
 
Macでの半角カタカナの入力の仕方2013
Macでの半角カタカナの入力の仕方2013Macでの半角カタカナの入力の仕方2013
Macでの半角カタカナの入力の仕方2013Kentaro Kogarimai
 
ドラッカー365 0101リーダーの真摯さ,0228顧客は誰か,0608自己刷新の問い,0901汝の時間を知れ
ドラッカー365 0101リーダーの真摯さ,0228顧客は誰か,0608自己刷新の問い,0901汝の時間を知れドラッカー365 0101リーダーの真摯さ,0228顧客は誰か,0608自己刷新の問い,0901汝の時間を知れ
ドラッカー365 0101リーダーの真摯さ,0228顧客は誰か,0608自己刷新の問い,0901汝の時間を知れKentaro Kogarimai
 
Seminar gp torino_2012_reviews rotated
Seminar gp torino_2012_reviews rotatedSeminar gp torino_2012_reviews rotated
Seminar gp torino_2012_reviews rotatedIva
 
Garcia jhon unidad3_tics HOJA DE VIDA
Garcia jhon unidad3_tics HOJA DE VIDAGarcia jhon unidad3_tics HOJA DE VIDA
Garcia jhon unidad3_tics HOJA DE VIDAJHON GARCIA
 
Question 5
Question 5Question 5
Question 5Simikap
 
Tournament shortcuts
Tournament shortcutsTournament shortcuts
Tournament shortcutsIva
 
Seminar gp milan_2011_innistrad_dissected
Seminar gp milan_2011_innistrad_dissectedSeminar gp milan_2011_innistrad_dissected
Seminar gp milan_2011_innistrad_dissectedIva
 
Basic Guide to Deck Checks
Basic Guide to Deck ChecksBasic Guide to Deck Checks
Basic Guide to Deck ChecksIva
 
Is DIY travel really the best use of your time and money ?
Is DIY travel really the best use of your time and money ? Is DIY travel really the best use of your time and money ?
Is DIY travel really the best use of your time and money ? Bob Govan
 

En vedette (20)

Computacion: Slideshare y Flickr
Computacion: Slideshare y FlickrComputacion: Slideshare y Flickr
Computacion: Slideshare y Flickr
 
Btq
BtqBtq
Btq
 
State based actions
State based actionsState based actions
State based actions
 
question 2
question 2question 2
question 2
 
Layers: The interaction of continuous effects - Joel Nerenberg
Layers: The interaction of continuous effects - Joel NerenbergLayers: The interaction of continuous effects - Joel Nerenberg
Layers: The interaction of continuous effects - Joel Nerenberg
 
Level5 unit2 lesson1_galileo
Level5 unit2 lesson1_galileoLevel5 unit2 lesson1_galileo
Level5 unit2 lesson1_galileo
 
Objectification presentation
Objectification presentationObjectification presentation
Objectification presentation
 
Dropbox
DropboxDropbox
Dropbox
 
Question 3
Question 3Question 3
Question 3
 
How to give rulings
How to give rulingsHow to give rulings
How to give rulings
 
Macでの半角カタカナの入力の仕方2013
Macでの半角カタカナの入力の仕方2013Macでの半角カタカナの入力の仕方2013
Macでの半角カタカナの入力の仕方2013
 
ドラッカー365 0101リーダーの真摯さ,0228顧客は誰か,0608自己刷新の問い,0901汝の時間を知れ
ドラッカー365 0101リーダーの真摯さ,0228顧客は誰か,0608自己刷新の問い,0901汝の時間を知れドラッカー365 0101リーダーの真摯さ,0228顧客は誰か,0608自己刷新の問い,0901汝の時間を知れ
ドラッカー365 0101リーダーの真摯さ,0228顧客は誰か,0608自己刷新の問い,0901汝の時間を知れ
 
Seminar gp torino_2012_reviews rotated
Seminar gp torino_2012_reviews rotatedSeminar gp torino_2012_reviews rotated
Seminar gp torino_2012_reviews rotated
 
Garcia jhon unidad3_tics HOJA DE VIDA
Garcia jhon unidad3_tics HOJA DE VIDAGarcia jhon unidad3_tics HOJA DE VIDA
Garcia jhon unidad3_tics HOJA DE VIDA
 
Question 5
Question 5Question 5
Question 5
 
Tournament shortcuts
Tournament shortcutsTournament shortcuts
Tournament shortcuts
 
Seminar gp milan_2011_innistrad_dissected
Seminar gp milan_2011_innistrad_dissectedSeminar gp milan_2011_innistrad_dissected
Seminar gp milan_2011_innistrad_dissected
 
Jhon.
Jhon.Jhon.
Jhon.
 
Basic Guide to Deck Checks
Basic Guide to Deck ChecksBasic Guide to Deck Checks
Basic Guide to Deck Checks
 
Is DIY travel really the best use of your time and money ?
Is DIY travel really the best use of your time and money ? Is DIY travel really the best use of your time and money ?
Is DIY travel really the best use of your time and money ?
 

Similaire à Seminar gp torino_2012_reviews2

Business Writing Level 1
Business Writing Level 1Business Writing Level 1
Business Writing Level 1Ronald Macklin
 
Interview Tips
Interview TipsInterview Tips
Interview Tipsgugler
 
Communication skills mbahotspot_ppt
Communication skills mbahotspot_pptCommunication skills mbahotspot_ppt
Communication skills mbahotspot_ppthima bindu
 
7 Tips for Writing a Film Review
7 Tips for Writing a Film Review7 Tips for Writing a Film Review
7 Tips for Writing a Film ReviewSteve Sorensen
 
I don't like your design
I don't like your designI don't like your design
I don't like your designPetr Stedry
 
ArcReady - Professional Patterns On The Job
ArcReady - Professional Patterns On The JobArcReady - Professional Patterns On The Job
ArcReady - Professional Patterns On The JobMicrosoft ArcReady
 
Design without critique is like a flower without water (WebExpo 2013 version)
Design without critique is like a flower without water (WebExpo 2013 version)Design without critique is like a flower without water (WebExpo 2013 version)
Design without critique is like a flower without water (WebExpo 2013 version)Petr Stedry
 
Police Sergeant promotional interview techniques
Police Sergeant promotional interview techniquesPolice Sergeant promotional interview techniques
Police Sergeant promotional interview techniquesJulie Rodriguez
 
Design without critique is like a flower without water (#uxce13 version)
Design without critique is like a flower without water (#uxce13 version)Design without critique is like a flower without water (#uxce13 version)
Design without critique is like a flower without water (#uxce13 version)Petr Stedry
 
Crack that interview.
Crack that interview.Crack that interview.
Crack that interview.Raghav Kansal
 
Wings to Fly Abroad
Wings to Fly AbroadWings to Fly Abroad
Wings to Fly Abroadpriyam10
 
Success secrets for Talentelle leaders
Success secrets for Talentelle leadersSuccess secrets for Talentelle leaders
Success secrets for Talentelle leaderssuperpeter
 
Become a good speaker
Become a good speakerBecome a good speaker
Become a good speakerSanoy Jacob
 
Become a goodspeaker
Become a goodspeakerBecome a goodspeaker
Become a goodspeakerhappyever
 

Similaire à Seminar gp torino_2012_reviews2 (20)

Business Writing Level 1
Business Writing Level 1Business Writing Level 1
Business Writing Level 1
 
Groupdiscussion
GroupdiscussionGroupdiscussion
Groupdiscussion
 
Interview Tips
Interview TipsInterview Tips
Interview Tips
 
Communication skills mbahotspot_ppt
Communication skills mbahotspot_pptCommunication skills mbahotspot_ppt
Communication skills mbahotspot_ppt
 
Peer Assessment
Peer AssessmentPeer Assessment
Peer Assessment
 
10 things communicators don’t know about experts (& vice versa)
10 things communicators don’t know about experts (& vice versa)10 things communicators don’t know about experts (& vice versa)
10 things communicators don’t know about experts (& vice versa)
 
Managing expectations
Managing expectationsManaging expectations
Managing expectations
 
7 Tips for Writing a Film Review
7 Tips for Writing a Film Review7 Tips for Writing a Film Review
7 Tips for Writing a Film Review
 
I don't like your design
I don't like your designI don't like your design
I don't like your design
 
Team Building
Team BuildingTeam Building
Team Building
 
ArcReady - Professional Patterns On The Job
ArcReady - Professional Patterns On The JobArcReady - Professional Patterns On The Job
ArcReady - Professional Patterns On The Job
 
Design without critique is like a flower without water (WebExpo 2013 version)
Design without critique is like a flower without water (WebExpo 2013 version)Design without critique is like a flower without water (WebExpo 2013 version)
Design without critique is like a flower without water (WebExpo 2013 version)
 
Police Sergeant promotional interview techniques
Police Sergeant promotional interview techniquesPolice Sergeant promotional interview techniques
Police Sergeant promotional interview techniques
 
Design without critique is like a flower without water (#uxce13 version)
Design without critique is like a flower without water (#uxce13 version)Design without critique is like a flower without water (#uxce13 version)
Design without critique is like a flower without water (#uxce13 version)
 
Crack that interview.
Crack that interview.Crack that interview.
Crack that interview.
 
Interview
InterviewInterview
Interview
 
Wings to Fly Abroad
Wings to Fly AbroadWings to Fly Abroad
Wings to Fly Abroad
 
Success secrets for Talentelle leaders
Success secrets for Talentelle leadersSuccess secrets for Talentelle leaders
Success secrets for Talentelle leaders
 
Become a good speaker
Become a good speakerBecome a good speaker
Become a good speaker
 
Become a goodspeaker
Become a goodspeakerBecome a goodspeaker
Become a goodspeaker
 

Seminar gp torino_2012_reviews2

  • 2. What is a review? A review is a permanent document you create in the Judge Center. In consists of you evaluation of another judge, you’re recognizing the good work of another judge and giving advise on how to improve. The documents is broken down in “strenghts” and “areas of improvement”
  • 3. How to create a review in the Judge Center… Log in into the JC and click “reviews”
  • 4. How to create a review in the Judge Center… Click on “create”, select “evaluation” and click on “continue”.
  • 5. How to create a review in the Judge Center… Top of page -find the judge you want to review, and insert all the data relevant to the tournament.
  • 6. How to create a review in the Judge Center… Year issue: select year 2010 Remember to write “This is a 2012 review” in the comment box
  • 7. What is the purpose of a review? Recognize the good job a judge did. To give advice on how to improve! A pair of “extra eyes” from outside – no one can improve much all by himself/herself. Share our expertise and mentor. Write what someone could improve. Ultimately: improve the Judge Program as a whole.
  • 8. Important! The main purpose of a review is to be helpful! It should help the judge to realize his/her mistakes and give advice on how to improve. It is not an exam. No one “fails”. It should be useful and a source of information on how to improve and do an even better job next time!
  • 9. Writing a review helps you as well! It helps you develop your observation and mentoring skills. It will also show that you’re involved actively in the judge community. (Not only the reviewed judge can read the reviews you write…) It’s part of the checklist…
  • 10. Choose your words wisely! Be tactful and diplomatic. Be careful not to offend someone. Keep in mind cultural differences and language barrier! Don’t use irony or sarcasm – it won’t work… Try to give constructive criticism.
  • 11. Be very specific in the review Write down exactly in what situation you observed a given thing. Write the role you and the judge had. Put all the details relevant to the situation you’re describing. Justify your point of view.
  • 12. How to observe: Shadowing (especially if “buddy system” is implemented). Chat – except for real situations, talk about hypothetical ones (“what do you think about…”, “what would you do in this case…”) Work together (example: do a deck check together…)
  • 13. What to observe: Interaction with players and judges General preparation in rules and policies Approach and attitude towards judging and players Execution of assigned tasks (remember to write what tasks exactly you’re talking about)
  • 14. “Role oriented” reviews A review doesn’t need to contain every aspect of judging. It can be quite short and specific to a role. Example: You can review your TL (even if you’re a L1), considering only the team leading aspects of that particualar judge in that tournament.
  • 15. Things to remember… Take notes during the tournament. They will help you remember what to write after a few days.
  • 16. Things to remember… If you want to get a review ask for it! (usually to your “buddy” or TL on a GP, or the HJ on a smaller tournament like a PTQ)
  • 17. Things to remember… You can review a judge of any level! Don’t be shy, even if they are high level they are not perfect! …except for Kalle ☺
  • 18. Things to remember… Language barrier and cultural differences. English is preferred language for judge reviews, but if it’s not good enough better write in your native language (if the reviewed judge also speaks it).
  • 19. Things to remember… Avoid absolute statements Don’t say “John IS…” if you observed a thing only once. Avoid words like “always” and “never”. By their nature, absolute statements are bound to be false and inncaurate.
  • 20. Things to remember… You can write a review to a judge that performed well. You don’t need to wait for a judge to do something “wrong”. Even if a judge does a great job, there are surely ways he or she can do an outstanding job next time! Even if there’s nothing you can think of as “area of improvements” – write the review anyway!
  • 21. Things to remember… Before you write the review, talk to the judge about what you observed. This is important: it will help you get a better idea on the judge’s performance. And sometimes it will avoid you some mistakes or inaccuracies.
  • 22. Things to remember… If don’t get the chance to talk in person – use some other mean (emails, Facebook, JC…) It’s important to exchange opinions and have some sort of debriefing. Sometimes it won’t be possible at the tournament, so feel free to do it electronically.
  • 23. Your first review Don’t be afraid to write one. It’s normal, everyone does it. Review a judge you know and have worked with on several occasions (this should be less intimidanting than reviewing a judge you just met for the first time on a GP). Talk to the judge before writing the review. It doesn’t have to be an outstanding review. It can be short and schematic. It will still be useful. Good reviews come with time. Don’t expect to be perfect immediately. Everyone needs practice and experience.
  • 24. You got a bad review. What now? Don’t get depressed. Don’t take it personally. Learn from it and try to do your best next time. Be happy about it! You now have something to work on and become a better judge!
  • 25. Examples: Even if you have arrived in the staff of the tournament in run for before thing you have tried to visualize the situation to try to improve what it was necessary. Your figure during the whole tournament has been at the most of the professionalism her your knowledge of the policies it is excellent and I would wish me to always work with people of your preparation. The only note that can move you is that at times your ways can seem hard as if you had always become rabid with whom is you before. I note this during the "Legacy@National" Tournament