Talk at Nov 2013 New Principal Investigators meeting discussing startup negotiating, what to ask for, what others ask for, why the first 5 years of an independent position is so important and how to tease seed funding. Canadian context but applicable to many scenarios.
Call Girls Guntur Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
New Investigators: starting up and keeping going
1. Start Me Up
(a state of mind)
**Motherhood alert: much of what I will say may be
obvious to a mildly alert 10 year old
2. 1. Start-up packages & lab essentials
2. How to support your lab (& yourself)
3. Maximizing opportunities & setting expectations
3. Why is your Start Up phase important?
h-index
h-index
The exception
h-index over time
year
h-index
year
h-index
After first 5 pubs, trajectory
relatively consistent
year
h-index
year
year
h-index
h-index
First 5 years of
independence often
most productive
h-index
year
year
year
4. Prof. Salaries
10
8
6
4
2
0
Monthly
$1,000s,
adjusted for
purchasing
power parity
pre-tax
Public Universities
•
The good news…. “Academics in Canada, where the entry level
salaries averaged $5,733, and full professors were paid an
average of $9,485, had more cause for celebration than in the
United States, where newly hired faculty members averaged
$4,950 and full professors $7,358
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/02/world/europe/02iht-educlede02.html
7. Start Up Packages
•
Value varies considerably - bigger not necc. better
•
Sets expectation on new PI
•
If too low, slows success & fosters resentment
•
If too high, performance expectation also v. high
•
Often small print clauses/clawback
•
Little relationship to date/economy
•
These are Assist. Profs. Secondary moves usually involve bigger
start-ups but also grants often also moved.
8. Negotiation Tips
Split into infrastucture/operating/people
Infrastructure:
•
Be reasonable - build a list of equipment and ask what is
accessible/can be shared. Understand the environment
you are entering, inc. policies
•
Be prepared to write grants to support equipment (CFI,
etc) - but secure guarantee
•
Don’t over engineer what you likely won’t use &
remember the small stuff & service contracts
•
Lab size & layout - possibilities for expansion?
9. Operating
•
Depends on type of lab but rules of thumb:
•
Wet lab: ~$15K per person/year
•
If mouse lab, add $2-3K
•
Dry lab: ~$5K per person/year
•
Include software seats
10. Personnel
•
3-4 people: e.g. postdoc, technician, student
•
Negotiate for 2-3 years but be prepared to cede
one to each grant
•
Can be in form of student stipends/fellowships
•
Technician is critical hire (3 months probation)
•
May not be eligible to recruit PhD student initially,
dependent on rules of department (may be able
to “co-supervise”)
11. •
A start up budget is like an ancient grant budget (when salaries,
equipment, consumables, were all eligible expenses)
•
Consider your start up as grant zero
•
Build it by thinking about what you need to do in advance of & to
enable your first grant
•
You get one shot. It looks bad to go back & ask for changes.
Moving money between the elements is OK but ask permission
•
A start up budget buys time but it’s value immediately drops (like
driving a new car off a lot)
•
Clawback (on awarded grant) is OK. It will be remembered &
helps next recruit
12. •
Departments want/need you to succeed. Build your
budget from bottom up. Don’t start with a target number.
You’ll lose credibility without justification/priorities
•
Your departmental assessment at ~5 years (often with
intermediate checks) depends on many factors but
don’t:
•
grow too fast OR try to protect start-up for a rainy day
•
Share and collaborate within and without dept.
•
Be a good citizen (dept duties) but realize these don’t
substitute for your scientific productivity.
13. Supporting Your Lab
•
Grants, grants, grants
•
These show independence, recognition by peers, competitiveness, etc.
NO SUBSTITUTIONS
•
Very difficult to obtain 2nd grant from agency before renewing first
•
Don’t submit prematurely, have your grants read by peers, read your peers grants,
get on panels/review other grants
•
Plan, plan, plan (deadlines, preliminary data, awareness of opps, etc).
•
Look for small, targeted grants as well as the bigger ones (RFPs, etc).
•
Encourage your trainees to write for studentships and fellowships.
•
Publish…….
•
5 years goes by in an instant
14.
15. Grants
•
Be aware of pending changes in grant programs
•
•
•
especially CIHR (Project & Foundation)
but all grants frequently change their eligibility
& requirements (LOI, ROI, etc.)
Keep CV up to date, build ResearcherID &
ORCID files (esp. if have common surname)
16. Seed Funding
•
Most departments/institutes have some discretionary reserves. These
can be accessed with good ideas but there are ground-rules:
•
Don’t consider this reliable funding. It’s one-off & opportunistic
•
It’s also used to bridge grants, deal with unanticipated events
•
Best pitches involve careful financial plan, advancing of funds (that
have likelihood of repayment) & involve other colleagues. Be visionary
but realistic. Share risk (by putting own resources into it)
•
Minimally, garner support of your colleagues. Deans, chairs, etc. rely
on others for advice. Differentiate seed funds from bridging funds
•
Don’t renege on outcomes if wish another kick at the seed can
17. Summary
•
Your recruitment is a partly mitigated risk. You are part of the equation.
Your success is mutually beneficial to you & your recruiters.
•
Mistakes are expensive & wasteful for you, your trainees & funding
agencies.
•
There is no perfect plan. You were recruited because you exhibit
promise & potential. The department is partly on the hook for you to
realize that potential but, ultimately, your fate is in your hands.
•
Don’t compare yourself to others to set the bar. There are many elements
considered & others may have other advantages.
•
Build your reputation & your publications. These are your currency.
•
Start-up phase thinking should last for your entire scientific career.