SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
TEL1
       2013-04-04


Constructing the
    learning
environment for
your TEL course
  Venla Vuorjoki
  LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
  University of Oulu
  2013-04-04
2013-01-31         2013-02-14          2013-02-28      2013-03-01         2013-03-14      2013-03-15       2013-04-04      2013-04-18
Thursday           Thursday            Thursday        Friday             Thursday        Friday           Thursday        Thursday
08:15-14:00        08:15-14:00         08:15-11:30     08:15-15:45        08:15-14:00     08:15-15:45      08:15-11:30     08:15-11:30
KTK205 +           KTK303 +            KTK303 +        KTK215             KTK112          KTK303           KTK215          HU108
KTK112             KTK140              KTK140

Course info,       Lectures and        Lectures and    Problem-Based      Lectures and    Problem-Based    Lectures and    Collaborative
lectures and       collaborative       collaborative   Learning (PBL)     collaborative   Learning (PBL)   collaborative   studying and
collaborative      studying            studying                           studying                         studying        ending the course
studying


                                                                                                                             OUTCOME:
GATHERING          PEDAGOGICAL                                                            TECHNOLOGICAL    CONSTRUCTING    A TEL COURSE
IDEAS              SCRIPTING                                                              SCRIPTING        THE COURSE      DESIGNED BY
                                                                                                           ENVIRONMENT          YOU




                Venla Vuorjoki
                LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
                University of Oulu
                2013-04-04
Today’s schedule:
                                           Thursday 2013-04-04
08:15-09:45           Collaborative studying (PBL, step 7):
KTK215


10:00-11:30           Presenting the results of PBL
KTK215
                      Instructions and evaluation criteria for the course environment




14:00-15:30           Optional ICT Workshop (with Jari Laru)
KTK207

     Venla Vuorjoki
     LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
     University of Oulu
     2013-04-04
PBL - Step 7

• Present your findings to the team
• Discuss your findings and create a joint (20 min)
  presentation about your answer to your learning
  goal/question
• Remember to include the sources of the information
  (references) somehow to your presentation

                      You have 90 minutes for this step




   Venla Vuorjoki
   LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
   University of Oulu
   2013-04-04
PBL - Presenting the results

10:00 Factors of the environment that influence
positively heterogenity?

10:20 How does blog support learning?

10:40 What are affordances of using VLE (Optima,
Moodle, Wiki, BlackBoard…) from student and teacher
perspective

11:00 Discovering the relations between different
technological tools, their affordances and pedagogical
purposes
   Venla Vuorjoki
  LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
  University of Oulu
  2013-04-04
Constructing the course
                            environment
– Every course design has some kind of ”home” environment. If you are
  not using any on-line learning environment, you should at least have
  one page (in wiki for example) where you give the basic information
  about the course structure and have links to all the necessary materials
  etc.
– The technical implementation is based on your scripts
– The course structure, timing and all the learning spaces and tools
  (physical or virtual) should be somehow visible.
– Includes:
    • Instructions and assignments                                 DUE DATE:
                                                                   14th of April
    • Pictures, other visual elements
    • Links or embeddings (existing materials)                 Send the link to your
                                                                   environment
– Remember to test all the links, check the spelling           to Venla and/or Jari
  and revise the structural elements
     Venla Vuorjoki
     LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
     University of Oulu
     2013-04-04
The assessment criteria
      for the course platform and implementation (1)
5             • The course is constructed to be logical and clear.
              • The learning outcomes of the course are explicit from the
                student’s point of view.
              • The timetable, instructions and other materials are complete
                and follow the socio-technical design and pedagogical model.
              • The implementation follows the pedagogical and technical
                scripts.
              • The course is functional in terms of technology, content and
                pedagogy.
              • The technical implementation (socio-technical design) is
                creative and innovative
4            • The course is constructed to be logical and clear.
             • The learning outcomes of the course are explicit.
             • The timetable, instructions and materials are based on the
                   chosen pedagogical model and socio-technical design.
             • The implementation is based on the pedagogical and technical
                   scripts.
             • The course is functional in terms of technology, content and
    Venla Vuorjoki
    LET – Learningpedagogy.
                   and Educational Technology Research Unit
    University of Oulu
    2013-04-04
The assessment criteria
      for the course platform and implementation (2)
3            • The course is constructed to be mainly logical and clear.
             • The learning outcomes of the course are explicit.
             • The timetable, instructions and materials are based on the
               chosen pedagogical model and are mostly complete.
             • The implementation is mainly based on the pedagogical and
               technical scripts.
             • The course is mainly functional in terms of technology, content
               and pedagogy.
2            • The structure of the course is partly messy and unclear.
             • The learning outcomes of the course are not explicit.
             • The timetable, instructions and materials are not clearly based
               on the pedagogical description and socio-technical design.
             • The implementation is mostly not based on the pedagogical and
               technical scripts.
             • There are some shortcomings in the technical or pedagogical
               functionalities.

    Venla Vuorjoki
    LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
    University of Oulu
    2013-04-04
The assessment criteria
      for the course platform and implementation (3)

1            • The course implementation is ill structured and unclear.
             • The learning outcomes of the course are not explicit.
             • The timetable and other materials can be found in the platform,
               but they are not based on the pedagogical description and
               socio-technical design.
             • The whole implementation does not follow the pedagogical or
               technical scripts.
             • There are critical shortcomings in the socio-technical and/or
               pedagogical functionalities.
0       • The implementation of the course is unfinished. The course
          platform is unclear and missing most of the necessary content
          and structure.
The team grade (0-5) is the (rounded) average of:
• pedagogical script (graded 0-5)
• technological script and course environment (graded 0-5)


    Venla Vuorjoki
    LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
    University of Oulu
    2013-04-04
Last meeting on April 18th:

                      PRESENTING THE COURSES
                       THAT YOU HAVE DESIGNED
                               20 min / team
                     (prepare a presentation as a team
                            with your own style)



DISCUSSION ABOUT YOUR DESIGN PROCESS AND
         EVALUATING YOUR COLLABORATION
   (fill in the individual assessment forms before the
                           meeting)
  Venla Vuorjoki
  LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
  University of Oulu
  2013-04-04

More Related Content

What's hot

Week 6 effectsoftechnology-roshana
Week 6 effectsoftechnology-roshanaWeek 6 effectsoftechnology-roshana
Week 6 effectsoftechnology-roshana
Gulali Agha
 
E learning at the University of Mauritius - Case of the VCILT
E learning at the University of Mauritius - Case of the VCILTE learning at the University of Mauritius - Case of the VCILT
E learning at the University of Mauritius - Case of the VCILT
M I Santally
 
e-learning @ the University of Mauritius - The case of the VCILT
e-learning @ the University of Mauritius - The case of the VCILTe-learning @ the University of Mauritius - The case of the VCILT
e-learning @ the University of Mauritius - The case of the VCILT
M I Santally
 
Educational research and innovation: The case of Technology integration
Educational research and innovation: The case of Technology integrationEducational research and innovation: The case of Technology integration
Educational research and innovation: The case of Technology integration
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
 

What's hot (19)

Presentation e-Portfolio Mundusfor
Presentation e-Portfolio MundusforPresentation e-Portfolio Mundusfor
Presentation e-Portfolio Mundusfor
 
Researching ICT in education: The story of a teacher
Researching ICT in  education: The story of a teacherResearching ICT in  education: The story of a teacher
Researching ICT in education: The story of a teacher
 
Week 6 effectsoftechnology-roshana
Week 6 effectsoftechnology-roshanaWeek 6 effectsoftechnology-roshana
Week 6 effectsoftechnology-roshana
 
Blended-learning in Science and Technology. A Collaborative Project-Based Cou...
Blended-learning in Science and Technology. A Collaborative Project-Based Cou...Blended-learning in Science and Technology. A Collaborative Project-Based Cou...
Blended-learning in Science and Technology. A Collaborative Project-Based Cou...
 
ITLA Presentation at AACTE 2013
ITLA Presentation at AACTE 2013ITLA Presentation at AACTE 2013
ITLA Presentation at AACTE 2013
 
Using e-learning for social sciences: practical lessons from the Free Univers...
Using e-learning for social sciences: practical lessons from the Free Univers...Using e-learning for social sciences: practical lessons from the Free Univers...
Using e-learning for social sciences: practical lessons from the Free Univers...
 
E learning at the University of Mauritius - Case of the VCILT
E learning at the University of Mauritius - Case of the VCILTE learning at the University of Mauritius - Case of the VCILT
E learning at the University of Mauritius - Case of the VCILT
 
e-learning @ the University of Mauritius - The case of the VCILT
e-learning @ the University of Mauritius - The case of the VCILTe-learning @ the University of Mauritius - The case of the VCILT
e-learning @ the University of Mauritius - The case of the VCILT
 
Educational research and innovation: The case of Technology integration
Educational research and innovation: The case of Technology integrationEducational research and innovation: The case of Technology integration
Educational research and innovation: The case of Technology integration
 
Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: ...
Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge:  ...Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge:  ...
Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: ...
 
Scaling Informal Learning and Meaning Making at the Workplace
Scaling Informal Learning and Meaning Making at the WorkplaceScaling Informal Learning and Meaning Making at the Workplace
Scaling Informal Learning and Meaning Making at the Workplace
 
Learning Design, Assessment and Evaluation
Learning Design, Assessment and EvaluationLearning Design, Assessment and Evaluation
Learning Design, Assessment and Evaluation
 
2016-04-06 research seminar
2016-04-06 research seminar2016-04-06 research seminar
2016-04-06 research seminar
 
Marianne Georgsens presentation "Exploring new pedagogies" at CAL11
Marianne Georgsens presentation "Exploring new pedagogies" at CAL11Marianne Georgsens presentation "Exploring new pedagogies" at CAL11
Marianne Georgsens presentation "Exploring new pedagogies" at CAL11
 
Technology Integration
Technology IntegrationTechnology Integration
Technology Integration
 
Itec tpack activities - tools
Itec  tpack   activities - toolsItec  tpack   activities - tools
Itec tpack activities - tools
 
Paoletti
PaolettiPaoletti
Paoletti
 
ESCOLA Module 2 Innovative Teaching
ESCOLA Module 2 Innovative TeachingESCOLA Module 2 Innovative Teaching
ESCOLA Module 2 Innovative Teaching
 
Flipped learning versus traditional teaching
Flipped learning versus traditional teaching Flipped learning versus traditional teaching
Flipped learning versus traditional teaching
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Virtual booklet
Virtual bookletVirtual booklet
Virtual booklet
 
Nursing ebp.9.2013
Nursing ebp.9.2013Nursing ebp.9.2013
Nursing ebp.9.2013
 
PARCA School system presentation Dothan schools
PARCA School system presentation Dothan schoolsPARCA School system presentation Dothan schools
PARCA School system presentation Dothan schools
 
Increasing District Level Evidence-based Decision Making in Cote d'Ivoire
Increasing District Level Evidence-based Decision Making in Cote d'IvoireIncreasing District Level Evidence-based Decision Making in Cote d'Ivoire
Increasing District Level Evidence-based Decision Making in Cote d'Ivoire
 
1st class agenda
1st class agenda1st class agenda
1st class agenda
 
Intro 2015-09-23-cw
Intro 2015-09-23-cwIntro 2015-09-23-cw
Intro 2015-09-23-cw
 
Marketing and Creativity-4 marketingPlanNOW
Marketing and Creativity-4 marketingPlanNOWMarketing and Creativity-4 marketingPlanNOW
Marketing and Creativity-4 marketingPlanNOW
 
Abstract iwa no ranking outcome
Abstract iwa no ranking outcomeAbstract iwa no ranking outcome
Abstract iwa no ranking outcome
 

Similar to Tel1 2013 04-04

Faculty Development as Flexible Performance: Towards a Competency-Based Curri...
Faculty Development as Flexible Performance: Towards a Competency-Based Curri...Faculty Development as Flexible Performance: Towards a Competency-Based Curri...
Faculty Development as Flexible Performance: Towards a Competency-Based Curri...
Andrew Tatusko
 
Edge hill interview presentation
Edge hill interview presentationEdge hill interview presentation
Edge hill interview presentation
TheThirdLine
 
E portfolios to assess and develop professional competency in speech patholgy
E portfolios to assess and develop professional competency in speech patholgyE portfolios to assess and develop professional competency in speech patholgy
E portfolios to assess and develop professional competency in speech patholgy
ePortfolios Australia
 
Open Education Practices at Universities in Hokkaido
Open Education Practices at Universities in HokkaidoOpen Education Practices at Universities in Hokkaido
Open Education Practices at Universities in Hokkaido
Katsusuke Shigeta
 

Similar to Tel1 2013 04-04 (20)

Tel 2013 03-15
Tel 2013 03-15Tel 2013 03-15
Tel 2013 03-15
 
Theory intro + gorup work 11.10.
Theory intro + gorup work 11.10.Theory intro + gorup work 11.10.
Theory intro + gorup work 11.10.
 
Tel 2013 02-28
Tel 2013 02-28Tel 2013 02-28
Tel 2013 02-28
 
Theory, introduction to the course, 27.10.2014, Essi Vuopala
Theory, introduction to the course, 27.10.2014, Essi VuopalaTheory, introduction to the course, 27.10.2014, Essi Vuopala
Theory, introduction to the course, 27.10.2014, Essi Vuopala
 
Minor start up-11092012
Minor start up-11092012Minor start up-11092012
Minor start up-11092012
 
Tel 2013 04-18
Tel 2013 04-18Tel 2013 04-18
Tel 2013 04-18
 
Tel oulu 27_01_2012
Tel oulu 27_01_2012Tel oulu 27_01_2012
Tel oulu 27_01_2012
 
Intro 20120913
Intro 20120913Intro 20120913
Intro 20120913
 
Tel 2013 03-14
Tel 2013 03-14Tel 2013 03-14
Tel 2013 03-14
 
Minor studies in educational technology - start-up meeting 2013
Minor studies in educational technology - start-up meeting 2013Minor studies in educational technology - start-up meeting 2013
Minor studies in educational technology - start-up meeting 2013
 
Course Possibilities & Architecture
Course Possibilities & ArchitectureCourse Possibilities & Architecture
Course Possibilities & Architecture
 
Internship organisation in Digital Library post-graduate educational programs...
Internship organisation in Digital Library post-graduate educational programs...Internship organisation in Digital Library post-graduate educational programs...
Internship organisation in Digital Library post-graduate educational programs...
 
Future of learning forum
Future of learning forumFuture of learning forum
Future of learning forum
 
OnEdu Learning Environment
OnEdu Learning EnvironmentOnEdu Learning Environment
OnEdu Learning Environment
 
Faculty Development as Flexible Performance: Towards a Competency-Based Curri...
Faculty Development as Flexible Performance: Towards a Competency-Based Curri...Faculty Development as Flexible Performance: Towards a Competency-Based Curri...
Faculty Development as Flexible Performance: Towards a Competency-Based Curri...
 
Edge hill interview presentation
Edge hill interview presentationEdge hill interview presentation
Edge hill interview presentation
 
E portfolios to assess and develop professional competency in speech patholgy
E portfolios to assess and develop professional competency in speech patholgyE portfolios to assess and develop professional competency in speech patholgy
E portfolios to assess and develop professional competency in speech patholgy
 
TU Delft OpenCourseWare for OCW EU workshop
TU Delft OpenCourseWare for OCW EU workshopTU Delft OpenCourseWare for OCW EU workshop
TU Delft OpenCourseWare for OCW EU workshop
 
4 Components of 21st Century Learning
4 Components of 21st Century Learning4 Components of 21st Century Learning
4 Components of 21st Century Learning
 
Open Education Practices at Universities in Hokkaido
Open Education Practices at Universities in HokkaidoOpen Education Practices at Universities in Hokkaido
Open Education Practices at Universities in Hokkaido
 

More from Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit

More from Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit (20)

Srl research lecture
Srl research lectureSrl research lecture
Srl research lecture
 
Srl renoved2015
Srl renoved2015Srl renoved2015
Srl renoved2015
 
What is srl_06112015_slideshare
What is srl_06112015_slideshareWhat is srl_06112015_slideshare
What is srl_06112015_slideshare
 
Self-Regulated Learning (SRL)course intro_2015
Self-Regulated Learning (SRL)course intro_2015Self-Regulated Learning (SRL)course intro_2015
Self-Regulated Learning (SRL)course intro_2015
 
Cscl2015 introduction slides
Cscl2015 introduction slidesCscl2015 introduction slides
Cscl2015 introduction slides
 
Intro 2015-10-12
Intro 2015-10-12Intro 2015-10-12
Intro 2015-10-12
 
Intro 2015-10-07-cw
Intro 2015-10-07-cwIntro 2015-10-07-cw
Intro 2015-10-07-cw
 
Intro 2015-10-05
Intro 2015-10-05Intro 2015-10-05
Intro 2015-10-05
 
Intro 2015-09-30-cw
Intro 2015-09-30-cwIntro 2015-09-30-cw
Intro 2015-09-30-cw
 
Intro 2015-09-28
Intro 2015-09-28Intro 2015-09-28
Intro 2015-09-28
 
Orient 22nd of september
Orient 22nd of septemberOrient 22nd of september
Orient 22nd of september
 
Intro 2015-09-21
Intro 2015-09-21Intro 2015-09-21
Intro 2015-09-21
 
Orient 15th of september.ppt
Orient 15th of september.pptOrient 15th of september.ppt
Orient 15th of september.ppt
 
Intro 2015-09-16-cw
Intro 2015-09-16-cwIntro 2015-09-16-cw
Intro 2015-09-16-cw
 
2015 09-11 intro-jarvenoja
2015 09-11 intro-jarvenoja2015 09-11 intro-jarvenoja
2015 09-11 intro-jarvenoja
 
Intro 2015-09-14
Intro 2015-09-14Intro 2015-09-14
Intro 2015-09-14
 
2015 09-11 reporting qualitative research results
2015 09-11 reporting qualitative research results2015 09-11 reporting qualitative research results
2015 09-11 reporting qualitative research results
 
2015 09-11 quali starting part 2
2015 09-11 quali starting part 22015 09-11 quali starting part 2
2015 09-11 quali starting part 2
 
Intro 2015-09-09-cw
Intro 2015-09-09-cwIntro 2015-09-09-cw
Intro 2015-09-09-cw
 
Orient 8th of September 2015
Orient 8th of September 2015Orient 8th of September 2015
Orient 8th of September 2015
 

Tel1 2013 04-04

  • 1. TEL1 2013-04-04 Constructing the learning environment for your TEL course Venla Vuorjoki LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2013-04-04
  • 2. 2013-01-31 2013-02-14 2013-02-28 2013-03-01 2013-03-14 2013-03-15 2013-04-04 2013-04-18 Thursday Thursday Thursday Friday Thursday Friday Thursday Thursday 08:15-14:00 08:15-14:00 08:15-11:30 08:15-15:45 08:15-14:00 08:15-15:45 08:15-11:30 08:15-11:30 KTK205 + KTK303 + KTK303 + KTK215 KTK112 KTK303 KTK215 HU108 KTK112 KTK140 KTK140 Course info, Lectures and Lectures and Problem-Based Lectures and Problem-Based Lectures and Collaborative lectures and collaborative collaborative Learning (PBL) collaborative Learning (PBL) collaborative studying and collaborative studying studying studying studying ending the course studying OUTCOME: GATHERING PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTING A TEL COURSE IDEAS SCRIPTING SCRIPTING THE COURSE DESIGNED BY ENVIRONMENT YOU Venla Vuorjoki LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2013-04-04
  • 3. Today’s schedule: Thursday 2013-04-04 08:15-09:45 Collaborative studying (PBL, step 7): KTK215 10:00-11:30 Presenting the results of PBL KTK215 Instructions and evaluation criteria for the course environment 14:00-15:30 Optional ICT Workshop (with Jari Laru) KTK207 Venla Vuorjoki LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2013-04-04
  • 4. PBL - Step 7 • Present your findings to the team • Discuss your findings and create a joint (20 min) presentation about your answer to your learning goal/question • Remember to include the sources of the information (references) somehow to your presentation You have 90 minutes for this step Venla Vuorjoki LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2013-04-04
  • 5. PBL - Presenting the results 10:00 Factors of the environment that influence positively heterogenity? 10:20 How does blog support learning? 10:40 What are affordances of using VLE (Optima, Moodle, Wiki, BlackBoard…) from student and teacher perspective 11:00 Discovering the relations between different technological tools, their affordances and pedagogical purposes Venla Vuorjoki LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2013-04-04
  • 6. Constructing the course environment – Every course design has some kind of ”home” environment. If you are not using any on-line learning environment, you should at least have one page (in wiki for example) where you give the basic information about the course structure and have links to all the necessary materials etc. – The technical implementation is based on your scripts – The course structure, timing and all the learning spaces and tools (physical or virtual) should be somehow visible. – Includes: • Instructions and assignments DUE DATE: 14th of April • Pictures, other visual elements • Links or embeddings (existing materials) Send the link to your environment – Remember to test all the links, check the spelling to Venla and/or Jari and revise the structural elements Venla Vuorjoki LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2013-04-04
  • 7. The assessment criteria for the course platform and implementation (1) 5 • The course is constructed to be logical and clear. • The learning outcomes of the course are explicit from the student’s point of view. • The timetable, instructions and other materials are complete and follow the socio-technical design and pedagogical model. • The implementation follows the pedagogical and technical scripts. • The course is functional in terms of technology, content and pedagogy. • The technical implementation (socio-technical design) is creative and innovative 4 • The course is constructed to be logical and clear. • The learning outcomes of the course are explicit. • The timetable, instructions and materials are based on the chosen pedagogical model and socio-technical design. • The implementation is based on the pedagogical and technical scripts. • The course is functional in terms of technology, content and Venla Vuorjoki LET – Learningpedagogy. and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2013-04-04
  • 8. The assessment criteria for the course platform and implementation (2) 3 • The course is constructed to be mainly logical and clear. • The learning outcomes of the course are explicit. • The timetable, instructions and materials are based on the chosen pedagogical model and are mostly complete. • The implementation is mainly based on the pedagogical and technical scripts. • The course is mainly functional in terms of technology, content and pedagogy. 2 • The structure of the course is partly messy and unclear. • The learning outcomes of the course are not explicit. • The timetable, instructions and materials are not clearly based on the pedagogical description and socio-technical design. • The implementation is mostly not based on the pedagogical and technical scripts. • There are some shortcomings in the technical or pedagogical functionalities. Venla Vuorjoki LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2013-04-04
  • 9. The assessment criteria for the course platform and implementation (3) 1 • The course implementation is ill structured and unclear. • The learning outcomes of the course are not explicit. • The timetable and other materials can be found in the platform, but they are not based on the pedagogical description and socio-technical design. • The whole implementation does not follow the pedagogical or technical scripts. • There are critical shortcomings in the socio-technical and/or pedagogical functionalities. 0 • The implementation of the course is unfinished. The course platform is unclear and missing most of the necessary content and structure. The team grade (0-5) is the (rounded) average of: • pedagogical script (graded 0-5) • technological script and course environment (graded 0-5) Venla Vuorjoki LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2013-04-04
  • 10. Last meeting on April 18th: PRESENTING THE COURSES THAT YOU HAVE DESIGNED 20 min / team (prepare a presentation as a team with your own style) DISCUSSION ABOUT YOUR DESIGN PROCESS AND EVALUATING YOUR COLLABORATION (fill in the individual assessment forms before the meeting) Venla Vuorjoki LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2013-04-04