SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 101
國立屏東科技大學熱帶農業暨國際合作系 
Department of Tropical Agriculture and International Cooperation 
National Pingtung University of Science and Technology 
博士學位論文 
Ph.D. Dissertation 
Preparation and Plant-growth Efficiency Assessment of 
Biochars 
指導教授: 黃武章(Wu-Jang, Huang) 
研究生: 歐蒂娣(Odette Marie Varela Milla) 
中華民國102年05 月16日 
May 16, 2013
2 
General Introduction 
Literature Review 
Identifying the Advantages of Using MSW Bottom Ash in Combination with 
Rice Husk and Bamboo Biochar Mixtures as Soil Modifiers: Enhancement of 
the Release of Polyphenols from a Carbon Matrix 
Feasibility Study using Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash and 
Biochar from Binary Mixtures of Organic Waste as Agronomic Materials 
Agronomic Properties and Characterization of Rice Husk and Wood Biochars 
and their Effect on the Growth of Water Spinach in a Field Test 
The Effects of Rice Husk Biochar and its Silicon Content on Corn 
(Zea mays L.) Growth 
Effects of Pyrolyzation Temperature of Bamboo Biochars on the Germination 
and Growth Rates of Zea Mays L. and Brassica Rapa
3
Definition: 
▪ Biochar is commonly defined as charred organic matter, 
produced with the intent to deliberately apply to soils 
to sequester carbon and improve soil properties 
(Lehmann and Joseph, 2009). 
Organic Matters 
(Wastes) 
Carbonization Bio-Char ? 
Activation 
Activated Carbon 
5
6 
Biochar 
Charcoal 
Biochar vs. charcoal 
Feedstock 
Unlike regular charcoal 
creation, biochar 
creation helps mitigate 
climate change via 
carbon sequestration, 
increasing soil fertility 
in the process
Motivation 
7 
Biochar research is in its first steps and as such, substantially more data is required 
before robust predictions can be made regarding the effects of biochar application to 
soils, across a range of soils, climatic, and land management factors. 
Concomitant with carbon sequestration, biochar is intended to improve soil properties 
and soil functioning relevant to agronomic and environmental performance. 
Hypothesized mechanisms were suggested but are not very clearly, for potential 
improvement water and nutrient retention (as well as improved soil structure, 
drainage) would be mainly enhanced. 
Considering the multi-dimensional and crosscutting nature of biochar, an imminent 
need is anticipated for a strong and balanced scientific review to effectively inform 
policy development on the current state of knowledge with reference to biochar 
application to soils.
Activated carbon: (Material) charcoal for application to soil (noun). Charcoal 
produced to optimize its reactive surface area (e.g. by using steam during 
pyrolysis). 
Anthrosol: (count noun) A soil that has been modified profoundly through 
human activities, such as addition of organic materials or household wastes, 
irrigation and cultivation. 
Biochar: (Concept) “charcoal (biomass that has been pyrolyzed in a zero or 
low oxygen environment) for which, owing to its inherent properties, 
scientific consensus exists that application to soil at a specific site is 
expected to sustainably sequester carbon and concurrently improve soil 
functions. 
Black carbon: (noun) All C‐rich residues from fire or heat (including from 
coal, gas or petrol). 
8
Black Earth: (mass noun) Term synonymous with 
Chernozem used (e.g. in Australia) to describe self‐mulching 
black clays. 
Char: (mass noun) 1. Synonym of ‘charcoal’; 2. 
charred organic matter as a result of wildfire 
(verb) synonym of the term ‘pyrolyze’ . 
Charcoal: (mass noun) charred organic matter. 
Chernozem: (count noun) A black soil rich in 
organic matter; from the Russian ‘chernij’ meaning 
‘black’ and ‘zemlja’ meaning ‘earth’ or ‘land’. 
9
Coal: (mass noun) Combustible black or dark brown rock 
consisting chiefly of carbonized plant matter, found mainly 
in underground seams and used as fuel. 
Organic carbon: (noun) biology C that was originally part 
of an organism; (chemistry) C that is bound to at least one 
hydrogen (H) atom. 
Terra Preta: (noun) Colloquial term for a kind of 
Anthrosol where charcoal (or biochar) has been applied 
to soil along with many other materials, including pottery 
shards, turtle shells, animal and fish bones, etc. 
10
11 
Carbon sequestration potential of biochar 
The global flux of 
CO2 from soils to the 
atmosphere is in the 
region of 60 Gt of C 
per year. 
The black numbers indicate how much carbon is stored in 
various reservoirs, in billions of tons (GtC = Gigatons of 
Carbon). The purple numbers indicate how much carbon 
moves between reservoirs each year, i.e. the fluxes. The 
sediments, as defined in this diagram, do not include the ~70 
million GtC of carbonate rock and kerogen (NASA, 2008). 
Figure 2.1 Diagram of the carbon cycle. (NASA, 2008). 
The principle of 
using biochar for 
carbon (C) 
sequestration is 
related to the role of 
soils in the C-cycle. 
This CO2 is mainly the result 
of microbial respiration 
within the soil system as the 
microbes decompose soil 
organic matter (SOM).
12 
Objectives 
 To generate biochars from organic wastes, to analyze their concept 
and origins, to investigate their key roles on agriculture application, 
at the same time we aim to study the effect of production process on 
plant germination rate and their potential uses with other industrial 
solid wastes, such as bottom ash.
13
CO2 
World carbon 
dioxide emissions 
are expected to 
increase by 1.9 
percent annually 
between 2001 and 
2025 
N2O 
Nitrous oxide (5 
percent of total 
emissions), 
meanwhile, is 
emitted from 
burning fossil fuels 
and through the use 
of certain fertilizers 
and industrial 
processes. 
CH4 
Methane, comes 
from landfills, coal 
mines, oil and gas 
operations, and 
agriculture; it 
represents 9 percent 
of total emissions. 
14
15 
In a study by Rondon et al. 
(2007), biochar addition to soils 
has been shown to reduce the 
emission of both CH4 and N2O. 
They reported that a near complete 
suppression of methane upon 
biochar addition at an application 
rate of 2% w w-1 
These results indicate that the effect of biochar additions to 
soils on the N cycle depend greatly on the associated changes 
in soil hydrology and those thresholds of water content effects 
on N2O production may be very important and would have to 
be studied for a variety of soil-biochar-climate conditions.
16 
Other relevant 
minerals can occur 
in the biomass, such 
as silicon (Si), which 
occurs in the cell 
walls, mostly in the 
form of silica (SiO2). 
Making biochar from 
biomass waste materials 
should create no 
competition for land 
with any other land use 
option such as food 
production or leaving 
the land in its pristine 
state. 
Biochar can 
and should be 
made from 
biomass waste 
materials.
17 
Pyrolysis is the chemical 
decomposition of an 
organic substance by 
heating in the absence of 
oxygen. 
Pyrolysis occurs spontaneously at 
high temperatures (generally 
above approximately 300°C for 
wood, with the specific 
temperature varying with 
material). 
It occurs in nature when vegetation 
is exposed to wildfires or comes 
into contact with lava from 
volcanic eruptions. 
At its most extreme, pyrolysis 
leaves only carbon as the 
residue and is called 
carbonization 
Source: www.carbonzero.ch
Table 2.1 Mean of post-pyrolysis feedstock residues resulting from 
different temperatures and residence times (IEA, 2007). 
Mode Conditions Liquid Biochar Syngas 
Fast pyrolysis Moderate temperature, ~ 
500°C, short hot vapor 
residence time of ~ 1 s 
75% 12% 13% 
Intermediate 
Pyrolysis 
Moderate temperature, ~ 
500°C, moderate hot vapor 
residence time of 10 - 20 s 
50% 20% 30% 
Slow Pyrolysis 
(Carbonization) 
Low temperature, ~ 400°C, 
very long solids residence 
time 
30% 35% 35% 
Gasification 
High temperature, ~ 800°C, 
very long vapor residence 
time 
5% 10% 85% 
18 
With regard to 
the use of biochar 
as a soil 
amendment and 
for climate 
change mitigation 
it is clear that 
slow pyrolysis, 
would be 
preferable, as this 
maximizes the 
yield of char, the 
most stable of the 
pyrolysis final 
products.
19 
The design was handed for mechanical 
construction and assembly to a company in 
Pingtung City and was completed on May 2010. 
This system was able to pyrolyze from 1 to 3kg of 
biomass (wood pellets, rice husk, and others) per 
run. 
The batch reactor vessel is 
a stainless steel horizontal 
tube with a diameter of 60 
cm x 90 cm. 
(1) Smoke chimney, (2a) stainless steel mixing 
arm, (2b) biochar mixing discs, (3) Reactor 
cover, (4) stainless steel pyrolysis drum, (5) 
temperature sensor, (6) stainless steel tube 
inserted in reactor wall perforation passed 
though (7) valve for sensor (placed in the 
lowest point of the reactor, inside drum 
reaching floor and fire flame), (8) gas tank, (9) 
gas-reactor valve, (10) gas feeder tube, (11) fire 
plate, (12) reactor wheels.
20 
(a) Front view of biochar reactor, (b) Movable capsule 
inside the reactor, it separates the fire and the biomass 
during pyrolysis, (c) Temperature sensor, can reach 1000 
C∘, (d) Flat cover avoids oxygen exchange, (e) Concave 
cover goes after flat cover, helps to direct the smoke 
emitted while charring to the excess pipe, (f) Reactor 
cover and excess pipe, (g) valve used to insert 
temperature sensor during pyrolysis, (h) Inside of 
reactor, (i) We count with 2 reactors for our research. 
(a) Dried muskmelon waste, (b) Muskmelon waste 
inside of the reactor, (c) Reactor feed by gas, (d) 
and (e) Flat and concave covers, we can observe 
how the charcoal is adhered to the flat cover after 
pyrolysis process, (f) Reactor after biochar 
production, (g) Final product: muskmelon biochar.
Biochar production from muskmelon 
waste 
1st test 
Initial weight 1.293 kg 
Final weight 0.447 kg 
Loss 0.846 kg 
Initial temperature 33∘C 
Final temperature 195∘C 
Time 96 minutes 
21 
1 tone of biomass 
gives 400 kg of 
biochar
22
23 
Ideal biochar structure development with 
highest treatment temperature. 
(HTT): (a) increased proportion of aromatic C, 
highly disordered in amorphous mass; (b) 
growing sheets of conjugated aromatic carbon, 
turbostratically arranged; (c) structure becomes 
graphitic with order in the third dimension 
(Emmerich et al., 1987) 
20μm 200μm 
The porous structure of biochar invites 
microbial colonization. Source: (left photo) 
S. Joseph; (right photo) Yamamoto, in 
Lehmann and Joseph (2009).
24 
phenols phenolic acids flavonoids anthocyanins
Polyphenols include several classes of 
compounds, such as phenols, phenolic acids, 
flavonoids, anthocyanins, and others, with 
more complex structures, tannins and lignins. 
The mixed combination of biochar and 
polyphenols applied at 1.5 % w/w to compost 
led to highest root yields (Jordan et al., 2011) 
Niggli and Schmidt (2010) tested biochar in 
Vineyards and found that grapes from 
biochar-treated plots had a 10% higher 
polyphenol content. Together with the much 
higher amino acid content, this was an 
indication of a greater aromatic quality of the 
grapes, which is then passed into the wine. 
18
Agricultural profitability 
Management of pollution and 
eutrophication risk to the 
environment 
Restoration of degraded land 
Sequestration of C from the 
atmosphere 
26 
The purpose of applying biochar to soil mainly falls into four broad 
categories:
27
29 
 To investigate the value of biochar and MSWIBA mixtures as soil 
modifiers and determine their effects on plant growth, root yield and the 
dry biomass weight of corn (Zea mays L.). And to find advantages to the 
addition of biochar to the BA.
30 
Polyphenolic compounds are the most important types of secondary 
metabolites that perform an important role in the biosynthesis 
process (Bennet and Wallsgrove, 1994). 
Natural polyphenols are necessary compounds in the stimulus of 
plant development and growth. Stimulus or inhibition capacity on 
plant growth and development is closely correlated with the 
concentration of Polyphenolic compounds used (Anghel, 2001). 
In some cases, the presence of these compounds in low concentrations 
can have a favorable effect on plant development. In other cases, when 
concentrations are high, there is an inhibition effect (Popa et al., 
2007).
31
32 
DTAIC
33
34
35 
The soil sample used 
for this experiment was 
collected from the 
National Pingtung 
University of Science 
and Technology field. 
“Ultisol” clay type, is an 
acidic soil with a pH of 
4.02, organic matter (OM) 
1.33, clay content 7%, silt 
72%, sand 21%, organic 
carbon (OC) 0.77. 
In terms of increasing 
plant growth, biochar with 
various pore sizes may be 
best suited to enhancing 
the physical, chemical and 
biological characteristics 
of soils.
36
37 
Each biochar was mixed 
separately with soil and 
bottom ash. 
Trays were filled with 
either soil or soil-biochar- 
bottom ash 
mixtures, randomly 
placed on net house 
benches and watered 
before sowing the seeds. 
For each bottom ash test, 
7 pots were used with 4 
replicates each (n=4) 
Mixtures: 1- soil, 2- 
bottom ash + soil, 3- 
bottom ash + rice husk 
400, 4- bottom ash + rice 
husk 500, 5- bottom ash 
+ bamboo 300, 6- 
bottom ash + bamboo 
600 and 7- bottom ash. 
Plants were harvested 
after one month. 
They were cleaned, and 
washed with DI water. 
Excessive water was 
removed to later obtain 
the total weight.
Plants were washed, cut 
into small pieces and dried 
in an oven at 65°C for 72 h. 
The dried material was 
ground and passed through 
a 250 Hm sieve mesh. 
The total phenolics were 
determined according to 
the Folin-Ciocalteau 
method (Rossi, 1965; 
Waterhouse, 2002; Koffi et 
al., 2007). 
The samples were filtered 
through a 0.45 mm 
Millipore syringe filter 
The total phenolics in the 
filtrate were determined 
colorimetrically. 
A volume of 100 mL of 
filtrate was added to 900 
mL of distilled water, and 
5 mL of 0.2 N Folin– 
Ciocalteau reagent was 
mixed. 
Absorbance was read at 750 
nm with a UV/VIs-105 
Genesys spectrophotometer 
(Thermo, USA). 
The total phenolic content of 
the samples were calibrated 
using catechins mono-compound 
and was expressed 
as parts per million and 
converted to (mg/L). All 
measurements were performed 
in duplicate. 
38
Heavy metal analysis 
(ICP) was carried out to 
identify the properties of 
the different bottom ashes 
used. 
The leaching extraction 
procedure followed USA 
EPA method # 1311 with 
minor modifications 
(EPA, 1990). 
Five grams of ground and 
weighed bottom ash were 
put in a volumetric flask 
together with 1000 ml of 
distilled water and 5.7 ml 
of acetic acid. 
Samples were left for 18 h 
in a toxicity 
characteristics leaching 
procedure (TCLP) 
rotator. 
After this procedure, 
samples where filtered 
and analyzed through a 
Perkin-Elmer 3000-XL 
inductively coupled 
plasma (ICP-AES) 
spectrometer. 
39
The contents determined by ICP showed 
that bottom ash from the three different 
cities did not differ from each other in most 
of the elements. 
There were differences in only four 
elements: Calcium > Lead > Sodium > 
Iron (Ca > Pb > Na > Fe>). 
Calcium constituted the largest proportion 
of the elements present in the bottom 
The pH of the bottom ash, when mixed 
with water, was as follows: Pingtung = 
4.92, Chiayi = 6.63 and Chunghua = 6.59. 
There was not a high reduction in pH after 
leaching of metals. 
40 
Elements Pingtung Chiayi Changhua 
mg/L 
Fe 285.3 - - 
Al 54.3 - - 
Si 74.7 48.5 38.6 
Pb 317.0 0.0 0.1 
Zn 107.3 6.7 39.4 
Cd - - 0.0 
Ni 0.7 0.2 0.3 
Cr 0.9 0.0 - 
Na 69.5 290.0 173.3 
K 18.9 109.5 65.8 
Sb 1.6 0.2 0.2 
Ca 1099.0 2392.0 2481.0 
Mn 11.6 3.2 3.1 
Mg 30.2 49.9 47.7 
Sr 3.5 6.2 5.9 
Ba 0.5 0.6 0.5 
Cu 2.0 2.5 4.1 
“‐” means not detectable.
41 
Bottom ash treatments 
Pingtung Chiayi Chunghua 
Mixed 
matrix 
% of germination 
NF F NF F NF F 
1 Soil 90 45 80 90 95 95 
2 Bottom ash + soil 80 95 55 50 45 70 
3 
Bottom ash + rice 
husk 400 100 100 75 70 85 90 
4 
Bottom ash + rice 
husk 500 95 95 75 80 80 70 
5 
Bottom ash + 
bamboo 300 90 95 70 80 85 70 
6 
Bottom ash + 
bamboo 600 90 100 75 35 75 85 
7 Bottom ash 65 70 - - - - 
NF= no fertilizer was applied, F= use of fertilizer. 
Germination results in treatments of bottom ash 
binary mixtures showed that the treatment with the 
most consistent results was the one source in 
Pingtung City. 
Rice husk biochar (400ºC) presented the highest 
germination percentage in all treatments having no 
differences among fertilizer applications and non-applications, 
followed by bottom ash + rice husk 
500, bottom ash + bamboo 300 and bottom ash + 
bamboo 600. 
Treatments with soil+biochar+bottom ash gave 
better germination percentage than those were only 
soil was used or in combination of bottom ash 
showing seed germination inhibition. 
Inhibition effect may perhaps have some 
explanations: in this study the inhibiting effect of 
bottom ash on seed germination was tested at high 
concentrations, such as to reduce the germination 
percentage
42 
In our results of 
plant growth we 
found differences 
among the 3 sources 
of bottom ash in 
combinations with 
biochars (Figure a,b 
and c). 
Pingtung showed the 
best results with 
differences among 
treatments and 
fertilizer applications 
(Bottom ash + IRRI 
400 °C), bottom ash 
applied alone 
showed inhibition in 
plant growth. 
The lowest average 
was observed in 
Chunghua bottom 
ash (Figure (c)). 
Plant size of MSWI bottom ash and biochar mixed matrix treatments. (a), (b) and (c), graphs show the differences between 
the three sources of bottom ash and their combinations with biochar with and without additions of fertilizer.
43 
We proposed that this 
interaction might 
decrease the use of 
fertilizer in agricultural 
soils. Therefore, the 
application of the 
mixed matrix of 
bottom ash and biochar 
is ideal for these types 
of soils as an organic 
fertilizer amendment 
and and also for its 
polyphenol content. 
From the analysis 
performed, polyphenols 
released from a 
BA/biochar mixture 
were found to have a 
linear relationship with 
the stem size quantified 
in plants (see Figure 
3.2). 
We also observed that 
the biomass weight was 
proportional to the 
polyphenol amount 
(Figure 3.3).
With these results, we can state that bottom ash can be 
used in combination with biochar. When these 
materials are mixed the generation of polyphenols 
increases. 
Since the mixed matrix of bottom ash and biochar 
releases a large amount of polyphenols, the use of 
fertilizer is not needed. 
We found that the use of fertilizer on the BA/biochar 
mixture had a negative effect on plant growth. 
Therefore, when assessing the efficiency of applying 
biochar, the fertilizer should not be added, given that 
the use of fertilizers increases the release of 
polyphenols inhibiting plant growth. 
When measuring root length and comparing it to the 
addition of fertilizer, we observed that root length 
decreased in the fertilized region (see Figure 3.4). 
Effect of polyphenol on plant dried biomass 
tissue before and after addition of fertilizer. 
Effects of polyphenol on plant dried biomass tissue before 
and after addition of fertilizer where Chunghua bottom ash 
was applied
45
46
47 
 To quantify the impact of: (1) rice husk biochar (RHB) with 
MSWI bottom ash and (2) bamboo biochar (BB) with MSWI 
bottom ash during germination and development of maize 
seedlings, as well as plant growth and amount of biomass 
produced. 
 To determine if the mixtures prepared for this study may have 
had a positive effect on the development of maize seedlings; 
therefore, the use of binary mixtures of bottom ash and biochar 
for plant growth may be feasible in Taiwan.
48
49
50 
Different types of MSWI 
bottom ash were obtained 
at a processing facility 
located in Pingtung 
County. 
Bottom ash from three 
different cities (Pingtung, 
Chiayi and Chunghua 
City) was collected and 
was air dried for 3 days at 
room temperature 
Then it was sieved using 
two mesh sizes (mesh 1- 
19.10 mm and mesh 2- 
4.700 mm). 
The all kinds of ash particles, 
especially in the area of small 
particles, have a relatively big 
surface area, porous surface, 
and for this reason they could 
have a huge absorptions 
capacity. 
Two different feedstocks 
were used to produce the 
biochars used in this 
report: rice husks and 
bamboo. each material 
was generated at different 
temperatures. 
The rice husks from the 
International Rice 
Research Institute (IRRI) 
- 400ºC, rice husk biochar 
from the Asahi Company 
- 500ºC. 
Bamboo Biochar from 
the Industrial Technology 
Research Institute (ITRI) 
- 300ºC and 600ºC. 
All biochars were 
obtained by pyrolysis.
51 
For the plant growth test, 
one pot was used for each 
of the binary mixtures. In 
total, seven pots were used 
for each one of the four 
treatments for the three 
different locations 
Each biochar was mixed 
separately with soil and 
bottom ash. Trays were 
filled with either soil or 
soil-biochar-bottom ash 
mixtures, randomly placed 
on net house benches and 
watered before sowing the 
seeds. 
Prior to planting in pots, a 
germination test was 
performed. Thirty maize 
seeds (Zea mays L.) were 
sown into germination trays 
using one tray for each of 
the different test 
Teatments (M1+F=Mesh 1 with 
fertilizer, M1/wF=Mesh 1 
without fertilizer, M2+F=Mesh 2 
with fertilizer and M2/wF= Mesh 
2 without fertilizer). 
Trays were watered daily. 
Germination percentages were 
recorded between days 5 and 10 
after sowing. 
(M1WF=Mesh 1 with fertilizer, 
M1NF=Mesh 1 without fertilizer, 
M2WF=Mesh 2 with fertilizer 
and M2NF=Mesh 2 without 
fertilizer). 
Pots were prepared and seeds 
were sown at a depth of 2 cm 
Water was applied after sowing 
the seeds. Fertilizer (N-P-K) was 
added 2 days after germination 
Data are presented only for the 
7th day of sowing corresponding 
to peak germination. 
Plants were harvested after one 
month and washed with DI water. 
Excess water was removed and 
the total fresh weight was 
measured.
Material Quantity (g) 
Soil 100% 474.0 
Soil 50% 237.0 
Bottom ash (19.10 mesh) - 100% 518.0 
Bottom ash (19.10 mesh) - 25% 129.5 
Bottom ash (4.700 mesh) - 100% 497.0 
Bottom ash (4.700 mesh) - 25% 124.25 
Bamboo 300 - 100% 154.0 
Bamboo 300 - 25% 38.5 
Bamboo 600 - 100% 16.01 
Bamboo 600 - 25% 40.5 
RH 400 - 100% 129.0 
RH 400 - 25% 32.25 
RH 500 - 100% 45.0 
RH 500 - 25% 11.25 
Pot size 142.70 cm3 
52 
Heavy metal analysis (ICP) was carried out 
to identify the properties of the different 
bottom ashes and biochar used. 
We examined the effect and the interaction 
of rice husk biochar, bamboo biochar and 
MSWI bottom ash on the germination and 
growth of maize plants. 
Accumulation of trace elements in plant 
tissue was measured using Atomic- 
Absorption Spectroscopy (AA).
53 
The first aim of our research is to determine whether adding biochar to soil has an effect on seed 
germination. The following results have been seen in previous experiments for rice husk biochar applications: 
a) increased the soil pH, thus increasing phosphorus (P), 
b) enhanced aeration in the crop root zone 
c) enhanced the water-holding capacity of the soil and d) 
improved exchangeable potassium (K) and magnesium 
(Mg) levels (FFTC, 2001). 
It has been found that when incorporated with sludge composting, bamboo biochar is an effective fertilizer 
reducing nitrogen loss in the soil (Hua et al., 2009). 
The positive outcome was linked to the high adsorption capacity of biochar particles during the composting process 
(Dias et al., 2007). 
In similar research, Asada et al., (2002) found that bamboo biochar is effective in absorbing ammonia in 
soils. 
This was attributed to acidic functional groups being formed as an effect of thermolysis of cellulose and lignin at 
temperatures of 400 and 500°C (Lehmann and Joseph, 2007).
Our preliminary results in plant 
germination showed that 
application into the soil of rice 
husk biochar and bamboo biochar 
in combination with MSWI 
bottom ash without fertilizer 
differs slightly from the mixtures 
where fertilizer was used 
This suggests that the application 
of fertilizer to the binary mixture 
did not cause any impact in the 
germination of Zea mays L. seeds. 
This effect was attributed to the 
high content of beneficial nutrients 
already present in bottom ashes 
and possibly to the efficient 
absorption of heavy metals. 
While the use of two different 
meshes used for the bottom ash in 
this experiment (19.10 (Mesh 1) 
and 4.700 (Mesh 2)) did not have 
any influence on the germination 
results 
From the three different cities, the 
bottom ash binary mixture with 
the most consistent results was the 
one source in Pingtung City. Rice 
husk biochar (400ºC) presented the 
highest germination percentage 
(100%) in all treatments 
54
55
56 
Plant total weight (kg) Treatments 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
0.040 
0.035 
0.030 
0.025 
0.020 
0.015 
0.010 
0.005 
0.000 
Plant weight 
Pingtung BA-M1WF 
0.025 
0.034 
0.024 
0.029 
0.031 
0.013 
Soil BA+S BA+ 
RH400 
BA+ 
RH500 
BA+ 
B300 
BA+ 
B600 
BA 
a) 
Plant weight 
Pingtung BA-M1NF 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
0.040 
0.035 
0.030 
0.025 
0.020 
0.015 
0.010 
0.005 
0.000 
Plant total weight (kg) 
Treatments 
0.009 
0.011 
0.027 
0.021 
0.023 0.024 
0.011 
Soil BA+S BA+ 
RH400 
BA+ 
RH500 
BA+ 
B300 
BA+ 
B600 
BA 
b) 
Plant weight 
Pingtung BA-M1WF 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
c) 
0.040 
0.035 
0.030 
0.025 
0.020 
0.015 
0.010 
0.005 
0.000 
0.011 
Plant total weight (kg) 
Treatments 
0.021 
0.009 
0.029 
0.022 0.021 
0.009 
Soil BA+S BA+ 
RH400 
BA+ 
RH500 
BA+ 
B300 
BA+ 
B600 
0.040 
0.035 
0.030 
0.025 
0.020 
0.015 
0.010 
0.005 
0.000 
0.012 
Plant total weight (kg) 
Plant weight 
Pingtung BA-M2NF 
BA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
Treatments 
0.013 0.014 
0.027 
0.018 
0.010 
0.014 
Soil BA+S BA+ 
RH400 
BA+ 
RH500 
BA+ 
B300 
BA+ 
B600 
BA 
d) 
Pingtung BA‐M1WF = Pingtung bottom ash mesh 1 with fertilizer, b) Pingtung BA‐M1NF= Pingtung bottom ash mesh 1 
without fertilizer, c) Pingtung BA‐M2WF= Pingtung bottom ash mesh 2 with fertilizer, d) Pingtung BA‐M2NF = Pingtung 
bottom ash mesh 2 without fertilizer. Error bars show standard deviation of data. 
Pingtung bottom 
ash (mesh 1 and 2, 
with and without 
fertilizer) biomass 
total weight. 
Figures b, c and d 
showing the best results 
in the application of 
the biochar-MSWI 
bottom ash binary 
mixture 
Were rice husk biochar 
(400 ºC) showed the 
highest weight in 
treatments with exception 
of “a”, were Pingtung 
BA-M1WF treatment 
BA+S (bottom ash with 
soil) showed the higher 
total weight.
57 
To determine the total heavy 
metal content of the samples, 
bottom ash leaching samples 
were analyzed using inductively 
coupled plasma atomic 
emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES 
The contents determined by 
ICP showed that the different 
biochars had important element 
content that is beneficial for 
plant development. 
The contents determined by 
ICP showed that bottom ash 
from the three different cities 
did not differ from each other 
in most of the elements. 
There were differences in only 
four elements: Ca > Pb > Na > 
Fe. 
Calcium constituted the largest 
proportion of the elements 
present in the bottom ash with 
a high difference in the content 
between in Pingtung and 
Chiayi BA, and showing 
similar content between Chiayi 
and Changhua BA. 
The pH of the bottom ash, 
when mixed with water, was as 
follows: Pingtung = 4.92, 
Chiayi = 6.63 and Changhua = 
6.59. There was not a high 
reduction in pH leaching of 
metals.
58 
The bioaccumulations in tissue of Sr and Cu were higher than lead (Pb) contents in biomass 
tissue. Cooper (Cu) concentration was the highest in plants tissue with P1 F + BA + RH 500 
(219.607 mg/L) followed by the use of P2 NF + BA + BAMBOO 300 (23.999 mg/L) and the 
use of P2 NF + BA + SOIL (24.446 mg/L) . 
According to Hong et al. (2008), bioaccumulation of elements in different 
parts of the plants varies both with the concentration of the elements and the 
type of vegetable. 
In this research, the bioaccumulation of elements in plan tissue was found in 
concentrations not permitted for food products according to Hong Kong 
Government Center for food safety (2011). 
Special attention should be placed into the bioaccumulation of Cu, since it 
was the heavy metal that accumulated in higher concentration.
Treatments Pb(mg/L) Cu(mg/L) Sr(mg/L) 
P1 F + BA 4.064 0.06 3.506 
P1 F + BA + BAMBOO 300 ND 0.56 3.637 
P1 F + BA + BAMBOO 600 ND 0.096 4.244 
P1 F + BA + RH 500 ND 219.607 5.083 
P1 F + BA + RH 400 ND 3.717 3.243 
P1 F + BA + SOIL 4.203 6.308 3.167 
P1 NF + BA 7.375 0.624 5.56 
P1 NF + BA + BAMBOO 300 ND 0.457 2.98 
P1 NF + BA + BAMBOO 600 ND 1.78 2.674 
P1 NF + BA + RH 500 ND 3.594 3.663 
P1 NF + BA + RH 400 3.875 0.131 3.385 
P1 NF + BA + SOIL ND 0.424 3.192 
P1 NF + SOIL ND 3.962 2.643 
P2 F + BA 4.569 5.311 5.12 
P2 F + BA + BAMBOO 300 0.075 1.611 3.055 
P2 F + BA + RH 500 4.121 1.267 2.974 
P2 F + BA + RH 400 ND 1.969 2.824 
P2 F + BA + SOIL 0.67 2.159 2.746 
P2 F + BA +BAMBOO 600 1.378 0.947 3.365 
P2 F + SOIL ND 2.059 2.431 
P2 NF + BA + BAMBOO 300 4.187 23.999 2.763 
P2 NF + BA + BAMBOO 600 ND 0.22 3.594 
P2 NF + BA + RH 500 ND 2.173 2.789 
P2 NF + BA + RH 400 2.253 2.237 2.498 
P2 NF + BA + SOIL ND 24.446 3.018 
P2 NF + SOIL ND 2.733 3.627 
59 
Table 4.5, shows results of Pb, Cu, and 
Sr analyzed for Pingtung bottom ash, 
due to its high plant growth on 
treatments 
P1= Pingtung mesh 1(19.10 m/m-) 
P2= Pingtung mesh 2 (4.700 m/m-), F= 
With addition of fertilizer 
NF= No fertilizer was used, 
BA= Bottom ash, RH 400 
IRRI = Rice husk biochar pyrolyzed at 
400°C 
RH 500 Company= Rice husk biochar 
pyrolyzed at 500°C 
Bamboo 300 = Bamboo biochar 
pyrolyzed at 300°C 
Bamboo 600 = Bamboo biochar 
pyrolyzed at 600°C.
60 
ICP of Biochars 
RH 
RH 
400 
500 
Bambo 
o 300 
Bambo 
o 600 
Elements mg/L 
Fe 77.4 3.36 0.462 1.02 
Zn 5.07 
0.64 
5 0.569 0.97 
Na NA 17.8 5.65 5.62 
K 62.2 159 82 103.0 
Ca 18.2 39.4 7.9 13.0 
Mn 4.65 6.94 1.67 2.62 
Mg 23 17.9 13.4 22.2 
Cu 
0.15 
4 
0.15 
7 0.101 0.293 
Elements Pingtung Chiayi Changhua 
mg/L 
Fe 285.3 
Al 54.3 
Si 74.7 48.5 38.6 
Pb 317.0 0.0 0.1 
Zn 107.3 6.7 39.4 
Cd 0.0 
Ni 0.7 0.2 0.3 
Cr 0.9 0.0 
Na 69.5 290.0 173.3 
K 18.9 109.5 65.8 
Sb 1.6 0.2 0.2 
Ca 1099.0 2392.0 2481.0 
Mn 11.6 3.2 3.1 
Mg 30.2 49.9 47.7 
Sr 3.5 6.2 5.9 
Ba 0.5 0.6 0.5 
Cu 2.0 2.5 4.1
61
62
63 
To demonstrate that rice husk biochar could act as a soil 
conditioner, enhancing water spinach growth by supplying and 
retaining nutrients and thus improving the soil’s physical and 
biological properties. 
To explore whether rice husk biochar (RHB) and wood biochar 
(WB), in combination with fertilizers, could increase the biomass 
yield of water spinach. 
We hope that the results of our work may help to determine 
which of the biochars is more beneficial in boosting the production 
of water spinach.
64
65
Production of rice husk 
biochar (RHB) was 
carried out by the 
Industrial Technology 
Research Institute (ITRI), 
located in Hsinchu, 
Taiwan. 
RHB was pyrolized using 
a small-scale reactor at 
300-350ºC with a 
residence time of 1 hour. 
These temperatures may 
be applicable for small 
scale farmers who lack 
access to credit and 
cannot afford high-scale 
pyrolysis plants. 
66 
In a study made by 
Hossain et al. (2011) 
concerning the influence 
of pyrolysis temperature 
on production and the 
nutrient properties of 
biochar, researchers 
concluded that pyrolysis 
temperature has a 
significant effect on the 
chemical properties of the 
biochar produced. 
Wood biochar (WB) was 
purchased in an 
agricultural shop near the 
experimental site and WB 
was prepared by open-burn 
(the proposed 
temperature was 250-300 
ºC). 
In order to observe the 
performance of both 
biochars in their original 
shapes, we avoided the 
use of grinders or sieves 
to reduce the particle size 
in the soil applications.
67 
By using an SEM S-3000N 
HITACHI production 
microscope, the 
morphology of both WB 
and RHB samples was 
examined 
A Perkins-Elmer EA 
analyzer determined the 
elemental composition of 
the biochar, such as the 
biomass that would be ideal 
for application as biochar 
for carbon sequestration. 
A Bruker Vector-22 FT-IR 
spectrometer identified the 
sample to determine the 
organic functional groups 
present for each biomass, 
especially carbons. 
Volatile matter in biochar 
was determined following 
the ASTM D 3175 -07 
standard test method. 
A Beckman Coulter SA 
3100 BET analyzer 
containing approximately 
0.1000 g to 0.2000 g of 
each biochar sample was 
then used at a temperature 
of 50Cº for 60 to determine 
the surface area of each 
biochar. 
Electrical conductivity and 
total dissolved solids were 
measured using a SUNTEX 
SC-110 portable 
conductivity-meter. 
The trace metals analysis in 
the samples was realized by 
using a Perkin-Elmer 3000- 
XL inductively coupled 
plasma (ICP-AES) 
spectrometer.
Field trial 
The experiment was 
carried out between 
December 2010 and 
February 2011 on the 
campus of National 
Pingtung University 
of Science and 
Technology (22°38'N, 
120°36'E) in Pingtung 
County in the 
southern part of 
Taiwan. 
Soil analysis 
Soil was sampled 
from a 0 to 20 cm 
horizon on a clayey 
Ultisol, which is 
typically used for 
vegetable and fruit 
production in 
southern Taiwan. 
68
Water spinach plants were 
germinated for two weeks and 
later transplanted into plots. 
Each plot was 1.94 m x 1.10 m. 
Five different treatments were 
assigned to each of the biochars 
and to one control group. 
RHB and WB were weighted 
and added to each plot. Every 
plot was mixed with the assigned 
quantity of biochar using the 
“top soil” mixing technique 
(Major, 2009). 
The effect of biochar on root 
growth was measured to 
compare the effects of the 
different types and quantities of 
rice husk and wood biochars 
used. 
After eight weeks of growth, the 
plants were harvested. Plant 
morphological characteristics 
measured included: leaf number, 
leaf length, leaf width, stem 
number, stem size, fresh plant 
weight, root growth and the 
chlorophyll content of the leaves 
Before transplanting, each plot 
was irrigated for 20 min. Plants 
were transplanted 15 cm apart, 
with 22 plants per plot. A 
perforated pipe system was used 
to water the plants every 2 days 
for 10 min. Soluble N-P-K 
fertilizer 20-20-20 was applied to 
the crops 
Relative chlorophyll content 
(Soil Plant Analysis 
Development (SPAD)) was 
measured every two days using a 
Minolta chlorophyll meter 
(model SPAD 502). 
69
70 
There were eleven 
treatments for rice husk 
biochar and wood biochar, 
along with one control 
group. 
Four soil samples from 
each treatment were dried 
in a precision oven at 
35ºC, homogenously 
mixed, ground and passed 
through a 2mm sieve. 
A 20:20 (soil: distilled 
water) solution ration was 
prepared for the 
determination of pH. 
Organic carbon (OC) and 
organic matter (OM) were 
determined using the 
Walkley-Black method 
(Walkley and Black, 
1934). 
Soil texture and 
characteristics were also 
obtained using the 
hydrometer method 
(Milford, 1997).
71 
The SEM-EDX 
analysis showed that 
the microstructure of 
the rice husk biochar 
was highly 
heterogeneous 
Rice husk biochar 
particles consisted 
of higher silicon 
(Si) mineral 
agglomerates on 
lower carbon 
content fibers with 
structures typical of 
its biomass origin. 
They exhibited a 
large degree of 
macro-porosity in 
the 1 to 10 micron 
scale, with contents 
of carbon (C), 
oxygen (O) and 
potassium (K). 
On the other 
hand, SEM-EDX 
analysis for WB 
indicated that the 
biochar particles 
consisted of high 
potassium, and 
calcium mineral 
agglomerates.
Elements evaluated Fresh rice husk Rice husk 
biochar 
Wood 
biochar 
Characteristics of materials 
T (⁰C) - 300 - 350 - 
Si (mg/kg) 107 171 10 
Ca (mg/kg) 108 220 273 
K (mg/kg) 9523 175 305 
Mg (mg/kg) 175 182 72.23 
Water (%) 11.3 3.9 - 
Ash (%) 12.63 50.53 - 
pH (%) 6.41 8.02 7.32 
Elemental 
analysis 
Fixed C (mg) - 43.73 52.74 
H (mg) - 2.38 3.58 
N (mg) - 1.0 0.72 
S (mg) - 0.19 0.37 
O (mg) - 2.36 - 
VM 
Volatile 
Matter (%) 
2.42 1.86 1.70 
BET 
Surface Area Analysis 
(m²) 
- 2.21 37.95 
Salinity 
EC (μs/cm) 1220 1392 704 
TDS (ppm) 488 558 282 
Sal (ppt) 0.2 0.2 0.1 
Heavy metal analysis 
Fe (mg/L) - 8.72 0.1 
Al (mg/L) - 0.97 0.37 
Cu (mg/L) - 0.09 0.01 
Pb (mg/L) - - - 
Zn (mg/L) - 0.7 0.4 
Cd (mg/L) - - - 
Ni (mg/L) - 0.11 - 
Cr (mg/L) - 0.03 - 
Na (mg/L) - 7.49 23.9 
Sb (mg/L) - - - 
72 
Results from several 
analyses, including: EA, 
BET surface area, EC, 
TDS, and ICP heavy 
metal analysis, revealed 
the applicability of rice 
husk and wood biochars 
on soil. 
Results from EA tests show 
a high percentage of carbon 
in wood biochar. 
According Stoylle (2011), a 
high percentage of carbon 
means the biochar can 
absorb more atmospheric C 
from the environment. 
Rice husk had a higher 
VM content as 
compared to rice husk 
and wood biochars. 
In comparison with rice 
husk, wood exhibits a 
larger BET surface 
Rice husk biochar has a area/m². 
significantly higher EC 
value than wood 
biochar, meaning 
greater quantities of 
dissolvable ions are 
present in rice husk 
biochar than in wood 
(Basile-Doelsch et al., 
2007). 
Concentrations of heavy 
metals in the tested 
biochars were all far 
below the ICP detection 
limits. Major differences 
between wood and rice 
biochar were in the 
content of Sodium (Na) 
and Manganese (Mn).
As indicated in Figure “a”, the WB added to soil increased the plant weight of water spinach by 
increasing the root size and leaf width; while the RHB added soil increased the plant weight of 
water spinach by increasing the stem size and leaf length as seen in figure “b”. 
73 
(a) The relations between root size and leaf wide and plant weight of WB and figure 5.5 (b), relations between 
stem size and leaf length and plant weight of RHB added plant samples.
In Figure “a”, the stem size of water spinach is shown to be proportional to the 
WHC/silt ratio, while the root size of water spinach is proportional to the OM/OC 
74 
ratio, as shown in Figure “b”. 
(a) The relations between and WHC/silt ratio and stem size of RHB and WB added plant samples and figure 5.6 (b) relations between and 
OM/OC ratio and root size of RHB and WB added plant samples.
Based on the changes in the silt and sand content in soil described in the figures, we can conclude that 
the decomposition of OC in biochar to soil OM resulting in the increase in WHC and the decreasing in 
silt is the mechanism of WB and RHB application. 
The stability of biochar is affected by pre-existing soil OM; the results indicate that the decomposition 
reaction of WB biochar is faster than that of RHB under a lower dosage amount (< 1.5 kgm3), while this 
reaction is inversed with an increased dosage ( > 3.0 kgm3). 
75 
(a) Changes of sand and silt content in the WB added soil and figure 5.7 (b) changes of sand and silt content in the RHB added soil.
76
77
78 
To assess the potential effects biochar from rice husks pyrolized on Corn 
(Zea mays L.) seeds germination and plant growth. 
 To observe how the silicon content rice husk biochar could affect the 
development of the crop.
79 
Rice-husk biochar has high silica (SiO2) contents and silicon (Si) is a beneficial element for 
plant growth that helps plants overcome multiple stresses including biotic and abiotic stresses. 
Silicon is effective in preventing rice lodging by increasing culm wall thickness and vascular 
bundle size (Shimoyama, 1958), thereby enhancing stem strength. 
Silicon plays an important role in increasing plant resistance to pathogens such as blast on rice 
(Datnoff et al., 1997) and powdery mildew on cucumbers (Miyake and Takahashi 1982). 
However, agronomists and farmers are not always aware that they could be able to improve 
crop production with increased stress and disease resistance by adding up a source of available 
silicon to the soil. 
Reports on the Si effect of rice husk biochar on plant seed germination are scant.
Four rice husk biochars were used 
in this study IRRI 
ITRI biochar was prepared by the 
Industrial Technology Research 
Institute in a specialized biochar 
reactor 
Several analyses including 
scanning electron microscopy 
(SEM),X-ray spectroscopy 
(EDX), Fourier transform 
infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), 
volatile matter (VM), electrical 
conductivity (EC), water 
holding capacity (WHC), and 
heavy metal analysis (ICP), were 
used to characterize the biochars 
properties. 
NPUST 
Shui-known
81 
Treatment Percentage of combined 
materials 
pH of 
material 
s 
Pyrolysis 
Temperature 
IRRI-B 50% Soil+50% biochar 7.38 400Ԩ 
ITRI-B 50%Soil+50% biochar 8.02 500Ԩ 
NPUST-B 50%Soil+50% biochar 8.53 350Ԩ 
SK-B 50%Soil+50% biochar 10.04 700Ԩ 
DRH 50%Soil+50% rice husk 5.76 25Ԩ 
SOIL No soil amendment 
(control) 
5.02 - 
SOIL-F Soil + fertilizer 6.00 - 
IRRI‐B = International rice research institute biochar, ITRI‐B = industrial technology 
research institute biochar, NPUST‐B = national pingtung university of science and 
technology biochar, SK‐B = shui‐known company biochar, DRH = dried rice husk, 
SOIL‐B = soil plus fertilizer.
82 
These seven treatments were 
arranged in fully randomized 
design with 4 replications, each 
one of 10 plants in separated 
pots 
The amount of soil amendment 
applied (45g) was calculated 
based on the surface area of the 
plastic pot used ( 4.5 x 5.0 cm). 
The amendments were mixed to 
a 5 cm depth, after preparation 
they were placed in the net 
house and watered every two 
days. 
10 plants (pots) were grouped 
together to make one plot for a 
total of 7 treatments x 4 
replications x 10 plants 
(pots)/plot = total of 280 plants 
(or pots). 
The germination and growth of 
corn plants was performed for 
15 days. 
The plants were harvested at the 
end of the growth period and 
kept under refrigeration to 
further analysis. 
X-ray (EDX) was used to 
examine the morphology and 
silicon content of dried rice 
husk and biochar rice husk 
samples. 
FT-IR was used for the 
identification of the organic 
functional groups present for 
each biomass, especially carbons 
and -OH- groups. 
Differences between biochar 
treatments were analyzed by one 
way ANOVA using Duncan and 
LSD tests for means 
comparisons where ANOVA 
showed significant differences 
between treatments.
83 
The germination percentage for corn from the seven 
different treatments can be observed in figure 
6.1(a). Germination started on the 3rd day after 
seeds were planted. 
Plants growth with biochar showed good 
development after germination. The 
treatment that showed the best germination 
was ITRI-B, which is a biochar produced 
by the Industrial Technology Research 
Institute (ITRI) 
Has a pH of 8.02 and was 
prepared at a temperature of 
500Ԩ, unlike treatments with 
biochar additions from IRRI 
and SK, these treatments 
showed an inhibition in seeds 
germination 
Saeed A. Abro et al., in 2009, assessed 
the effects of different levels of Silicic 
acid on germination of wheat seeds, 
where 7.2g silicic acid Kg-1 was applied 
to treatments and decreased considerably 
the germination of wheat seeds, this 
shows that increased levels of silicic acid 
reduces the germination rate.
Stem size mean for corn from the seven different treatments can be 
observed in figure 6.1(e). The treatment that showed the highest stem mean 
was SK-B, has a pH. 
Root development (figure 6.1f) was found to be significantly affected by the 
use of rice husk biochars in plants in comparison with soil and soil with 
fertilizer treatments 
According to the Anova mean comparison (figure 6.1g), the rice husks 
biochar treatments showed significantly higher weight than the rest of the 
biochars and soil treatments on biomass growth were NPUST-B and ITRI-B. 
Studies realized around the world, have shown that applying supplemental 
silicon can inhibit plant disease, decrease insect pests injuries, and improve 
crop tolerance to environmental stress (Heckman, 2012). 
In a similar research made by Sundahri et al., (2001) were found positive 84 
effects of gypsum and sodium silicate on the wheat grown under 
waterlogged soils especially in increasing plant height leaf and shoot dry 
mass.
85 
(d) 
(e) 
Scanning electron micrographs and EDX spectrograms of element particles found in raw rice husk and rice husk biochar from pyrolysis process at 
different temperatures: (a) in IRRI biochar, (b) in ITRI biochar, (c) in NPUST biochar, (d) in SK biochar and (e) in dry rice husk.
86 
Germination Mean 
Silicon Weight (%) 
29.84% 
8.75 
24.38% 
4.75 
26.86% 
9.0 
1.06% 
10.0 
35.24% 
1 2 3 4 5 
38 
36 
34 
32 
30 
28 
26 
24 
22 
20 
18 
16 
14 
12 
10 
0 2 4 6 8 
5.0 
IRRI-B ITRI-B NPUST-B SK-B DRH 
Seeds germinated (mean) 
and Si weight percentage 
Treatments with biochar 
IRRI‐B = International rice research institute biochar, 
ITRI‐B = industrial technology research institute biochar, 
NPUST‐B = national pingtung university of science and 
technology biochar, SK‐B = shui‐known company 
biochar, DRH = dried rice husk. 
Relationship between germination mean versus Si 
content for the tested rice husk biochars.
87 
The results detailing the growth of water spinach 
showed that the application of rice husk biochar 
improves biomass production, increased plant 
weight by increasing the stem size and leaf length 
of the water spinach. 
In addition, the stem size of water spinach was 
proportional to the WHC/silt ratio; whereas the 
root size of water spinach was proportional to the 
OM/OC ratio of soil. 
We also proposed that the working mechanism of 
RHB in soil would be such, that the decomposition 
of OC in biochar-added soil to OM resulted in 
increased WHC and decreased silt in biochar-added 
soil (Milla et al., 2013).
88
89
90 
 To show that bamboo wood is a smart option for those industries that 
want to transform biochar into a profit without harming any 
ecosystem. 
 To investigate the potential capability of bamboo biochar to affect 
germination and growth of edible crops. 
 To demonstrate the effects on germination of different temperatures 
(240oC, 300oC, 600oC and 700oC) of bamboo biochars used in this 
study.
91 
Bamboo charcoal may be an ideal amendment for nutrient conservation 
and heavy metal stabilization due to its excellent adsorption capability. 
Recent research found that biochar could act as soil fertilizers or 
conditioners to increase crop yield and plant growth by supplying and 
retaining nutrients (Glaser et al., 2000; Major et al., 2005; Steiner et al., 
2007). 
Bamboo biochar has been used in studies where the content of polyphenols 
released by the carbon matrix was measured, as well has been tested is 
combination with the same type of bottom ash as agronomic materials 
(Milla and Huang, 2013 & Milla, Wang and Huang, 2013). 
However, there has been no research to date on the effects of pyrolyzation 
temperatures of bamboo biochar in seed germination and plant growth. 
In this study we present the results of a germination test and growth 
parameters made with four different biochars, produced under different 
pyrolysis temperatures (240, 300, 600 and 700ºC) and evaluated at two 
rates of applications (1- 100 (10%) t/ha, calculated as soil volume to 10 cm 
soil depth, and 2- pure biochar without soil application).
Biochar made from bamboo 
was used to produce the 
biochars applied in this test. 
Bamboo biochar was 
generated at different 
temperatures: 240, 300, 600 
and 700ºC. 
All biochars were obtained 
by pyrolysis with a 
temperature raising rate of 
5oC/min; biochars were 
sieved using a 4 mm sieve 
before use for the bioassays. 
Characterization of the 
material was made applying 
various test and analyses. 
X-ray diffraction (XRD) 
analysis was carried out to 
identify any crystallographic 
structure in the four biochar 
samples 
Fourier Transform Infrared 
spectroscopy analysis (FT-IR) 
was used for the 
identification or fingerprint 
of a sample or solution to 
determine the organic 
functional groups. 
Heavy metal analysis (ICP) 
was carried out to identify 
the properties of the biochar 
used. 
A HITACHI S-3000N 
scanning electron microscope 
equipped an energy dispersion 
X-ray (EDX) was used to 
examine the morphology of the 
biochar samples. 
Volatile matter in biochar 
was determined following 
the ASTM D 3175 -07 
standard test method 
(ASTM, 2004). 
Water holding capacity 
(WHC) of biochars was 
measured regarding the 
following procedures of soil 
analysis manual (Lee, 
2007). 
Electrical conductivity, total 
dissolved solids and pH 
were measured using a 
SUNTEX SC-110 portable 
conductivity-meter. 
92
Two different crops were 
evaluated, (glutinous corn and 
Chinese cabbage) addition of 
biochar at 100% (pure biochar 
without soil – test 1) and 50% 
biochar (50-50 soil-biochar relation 
– test 2) were evaluated. 
Seedbeds where prepared in order 
to test the four different 
temperatures of bamboo biochars. 
Each treatment had 16 pots. 
Seeds were sown in 500 mL soil in 
a plastic container (16 cm × 10 .5 
cm × 5 cm), the data of 
germination rate, started to be 
quantified on the 3rd day followed 
by measures on the 5th and 7th 
day of the trial. 
For corn a single seed was placed 
into the germination pots unlike 
cabbage, where 2-3 seeds where 
placed, due to their difference in 
sizes. 
Stem size, leaf number, leaf width 
and leaf length of each one of the 
emerged plants for corn and 
cabbage was measured. 
Statistical analysis of variance 
(ANOVA) was performed using 
SAS (v.9.2) 
93
ICP of Biochars 
Elements 
mg/L 
Raw 
Bamboo 240 °C 300 °C 600 °C 700 °C 
Fe 4.2 18.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 
Zn 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.0 0.9 
Na 6.4 6.0 5.7 5.6 12.7 
K 59.9 62.6 82.0 103.0 131.0 
Ca 8.6 8.5 7.9 13.0 12.3 
Mn 0.4 0.5 1.7 2.6 2.7 
Mg 19.9 7.1 13.1 22.2 18.8 
Cu 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 
WHC % 78.0 85.0 97.0 150.0 200.0 
VM % 3.7 3.0 2.8 1.0 1.0 
94 
The contents 
determined by ICP 
showed that as 
pyrolysis temperature 
increased the presence 
of elements in their 
majority also increased 
(Na, K, Ca, Mn, Mg). 
Raw bamboo has a 
percentage water holding 
capacity of 78.0% that is 
enhanced by 
carbonization process, 
resulting in 200% water 
retention. 
In our study, water 
holding capacity 
(WHC) increased to 
a maximum value as 
pyrolyzation 
temperature 
increased.
1.0 
0.9 
0.8 
0.7 
0.6 
(a) 
(c) 
(b) 
(d) 
(e) 
Amine 
CO2 
-CH3 
Aromatic 
C-O 
-CH C=O 2- 
-OH 
4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 
Intencity (%) 
Wave number(cm-1) 
95 
FTIR Spectra of tested samples, each letter (a,b,c,d,e) 
represents raw bamboo biomass and different pyrolysis 
temperature: (a) 240oC, (b) 300oC, (c) 600oC, and (d) 700oC. 
In this analysis of 
biochar, the FTIR was 
used specifically to 
determine the functional 
groups present for each 
temperature and 
biomass, especially 
carbons and aromatics. 
Various bonds in the spectra (at 3412.49 ~ 
3469.91 cm−1) corresponds to -OH stretching 
vibrations and this may be caused by acid 
and/or alcohol structures. 
The results of FT-IR and 
elemental analysis shows 
regardless of the 
similarity in temperatures 
in some biochars, the 
intensity and the 
concentration of the 
surface functional groups 
would vary. 
All of the samples also 
have a C≡N bonding in 
the same position of 
the CO2 peak (2347.92 
cm−1), this is expected 
due to the possible 
presence of nitrogen in 
the biochar. 
The importance of these 
differences from a soil 
fertility point of view is 
that surface area and 
porosity of the biochar 
plays a significant role 
in soil fertility. 
In contrast to the optimum 
conditions for the formation of the 
acid functional groups, more intense 
charring conditions (higher 
temperatures and longer charring 
times) are required for the formation 
of porosity and surface area in the 
biochar (Rutherford et al., 2004).
96 
a - Raw bamboo 
b - Bamboo 240 0C 
c - Bamboo 300 0C 
d - Bamboo 600 0C 
e - Bamboo 700 0C 
Cellulose Intensity (a. u.) 
(a) 
(b) 
(c) 
(d) 
(e) 
Graphite crystal 
101 
100 
002 
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 
2 Theta (degree) 
X‐ ray diffraction patterns of biochar samples; each letter (a, b, c, d, and e) 
represents raw bamboo biomass and different pyrolysis temperature: (a) 
240oC, (b) 300oC, (c) 600oC, and (d) 700oC.
97 
SEM–EDX analysis of biochar (a, b, c, d). The formation of particle size is showed for the 
four temperatures applied to obtain biochar. Is observed how porosity is developed, 
higher temperatures – the porosity number increases and the size of the pores narrows 
down, giving as a result better water holding capacity. 
The formation of 
particle size is showed 
for the four 
temperatures applied to 
obtain biochar. Is 
observed how porosity 
is developed, higher 
temperatures – the 
porosity number 
increases and the size 
of the pores narrows 
down, giving as a result 
better water holding 
capacity. 
If the development of 
pores in biochar 
samples is enhanced 
with increasing 
temperature (especially 
at 600 and 800oC), it 
may result in 
significant 
improvement in the 
pore properties of 
biochars (Mohammad 
et al., 2013).
98 
a a a a a 
a 
1 2 3 4 
1 2 3 4 
110 
100 
90 
80 
70 
60 
50 
40 
30 
b 
a 
b 
ab 
a 
ab 
b 
a 
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 
Seed germination mean (%) 
Biochar treatments 
Pyrolysis temperatures 
1) 240 0C 
2) 300 0C 
3) 600 0C 
4) 700 0C 
Corn 50% Cabbage 50% Corn 100% Cabbage 100% 
(a) 
Effects of different temperatures and rates of bamboo biochar applied for corn and cabbage. 
(a) Seed germination percentage, (b) stem size (cm), and (c) leaf number were tested at rates 
of 50 and 100%. Error bars show standard errors of the mean. Mean data followed by a similar 
letter are not statistically significant within each biochar temperature. 
100% - 600oC 100% - 700oC 
50%-700oC
99
100
101

More Related Content

What's hot

Biochar as Soil Conditioner
Biochar as Soil ConditionerBiochar as Soil Conditioner
Biochar as Soil ConditionerHajiraYounas
 
BIOCHAR: PREPARATION AND IT'S ROLE IN CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
BIOCHAR: PREPARATION AND IT'S ROLE IN CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATIONBIOCHAR: PREPARATION AND IT'S ROLE IN CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
BIOCHAR: PREPARATION AND IT'S ROLE IN CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATIONPuja Sinha
 
Biochar for sustainable land management and climate change mitigation
Biochar for sustainable land management and climate change mitigationBiochar for sustainable land management and climate change mitigation
Biochar for sustainable land management and climate change mitigationExternalEvents
 
Biochar-1-12-21 (1).pptx
Biochar-1-12-21 (1).pptxBiochar-1-12-21 (1).pptx
Biochar-1-12-21 (1).pptxssuser8a93f3
 
Contaminated land management in Malaysia: Policies and legal framework
Contaminated land management in Malaysia: Policies and legal frameworkContaminated land management in Malaysia: Policies and legal framework
Contaminated land management in Malaysia: Policies and legal frameworkExternalEvents
 
Biochar: Recycling Waste Biomass to its Highest Value Use - McLaughlin
Biochar: Recycling Waste Biomass to its Highest Value Use - McLaughlinBiochar: Recycling Waste Biomass to its Highest Value Use - McLaughlin
Biochar: Recycling Waste Biomass to its Highest Value Use - McLaughlinMassRecycle .
 
Impact of soil properties on carbon sequestration
Impact of soil properties on carbon sequestrationImpact of soil properties on carbon sequestration
Impact of soil properties on carbon sequestrationyoginimahadule
 
Presentation biochar (2)
Presentation biochar (2)Presentation biochar (2)
Presentation biochar (2)jessicacullen93
 
Biochar Slideshow For Ic
Biochar Slideshow For IcBiochar Slideshow For Ic
Biochar Slideshow For IcShawn_Ganz
 
Biochar for Carbon Sequestration.pdf
Biochar for Carbon Sequestration.pdfBiochar for Carbon Sequestration.pdf
Biochar for Carbon Sequestration.pdfMuhammadIrfan814188
 
Soil management strategies to enhance carbon sequestration potential of degra...
Soil management strategies to enhance carbon sequestration potential of degra...Soil management strategies to enhance carbon sequestration potential of degra...
Soil management strategies to enhance carbon sequestration potential of degra...koushalya T.N
 
Sequestering Carbon in Soil
Sequestering Carbon in SoilSequestering Carbon in Soil
Sequestering Carbon in SoilLeeAtTheLab
 
Biochar
BiocharBiochar
Biochargouckc
 

What's hot (20)

Biochar as Soil Conditioner
Biochar as Soil ConditionerBiochar as Soil Conditioner
Biochar as Soil Conditioner
 
BIOCHAR: PREPARATION AND IT'S ROLE IN CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
BIOCHAR: PREPARATION AND IT'S ROLE IN CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATIONBIOCHAR: PREPARATION AND IT'S ROLE IN CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
BIOCHAR: PREPARATION AND IT'S ROLE IN CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
 
Biochar for sustainable land management and climate change mitigation
Biochar for sustainable land management and climate change mitigationBiochar for sustainable land management and climate change mitigation
Biochar for sustainable land management and climate change mitigation
 
Bio-char
Bio-charBio-char
Bio-char
 
Carbon sequestration
Carbon sequestrationCarbon sequestration
Carbon sequestration
 
Biochar-1-12-21 (1).pptx
Biochar-1-12-21 (1).pptxBiochar-1-12-21 (1).pptx
Biochar-1-12-21 (1).pptx
 
Contaminated land management in Malaysia: Policies and legal framework
Contaminated land management in Malaysia: Policies and legal frameworkContaminated land management in Malaysia: Policies and legal framework
Contaminated land management in Malaysia: Policies and legal framework
 
Modern concepts of soil fertility
Modern concepts of soil fertilityModern concepts of soil fertility
Modern concepts of soil fertility
 
Biochar: Recycling Waste Biomass to its Highest Value Use - McLaughlin
Biochar: Recycling Waste Biomass to its Highest Value Use - McLaughlinBiochar: Recycling Waste Biomass to its Highest Value Use - McLaughlin
Biochar: Recycling Waste Biomass to its Highest Value Use - McLaughlin
 
Crop Residue Management for Soil Health Enhancement
Crop Residue Management for Soil Health EnhancementCrop Residue Management for Soil Health Enhancement
Crop Residue Management for Soil Health Enhancement
 
Biochar pitch
Biochar pitchBiochar pitch
Biochar pitch
 
Carbon sequestration in cropping system
Carbon sequestration in cropping systemCarbon sequestration in cropping system
Carbon sequestration in cropping system
 
Impact of soil properties on carbon sequestration
Impact of soil properties on carbon sequestrationImpact of soil properties on carbon sequestration
Impact of soil properties on carbon sequestration
 
Presentation biochar (2)
Presentation biochar (2)Presentation biochar (2)
Presentation biochar (2)
 
Biochar
BiocharBiochar
Biochar
 
Biochar Slideshow For Ic
Biochar Slideshow For IcBiochar Slideshow For Ic
Biochar Slideshow For Ic
 
Biochar for Carbon Sequestration.pdf
Biochar for Carbon Sequestration.pdfBiochar for Carbon Sequestration.pdf
Biochar for Carbon Sequestration.pdf
 
Soil management strategies to enhance carbon sequestration potential of degra...
Soil management strategies to enhance carbon sequestration potential of degra...Soil management strategies to enhance carbon sequestration potential of degra...
Soil management strategies to enhance carbon sequestration potential of degra...
 
Sequestering Carbon in Soil
Sequestering Carbon in SoilSequestering Carbon in Soil
Sequestering Carbon in Soil
 
Biochar
BiocharBiochar
Biochar
 

Viewers also liked

Hugh McLaughlin - Biochar Workshop
Hugh McLaughlin - Biochar WorkshopHugh McLaughlin - Biochar Workshop
Hugh McLaughlin - Biochar Workshopgabriellebastien
 
Domsjö Fabriker - The unique Biorefinery
Domsjö Fabriker - The unique BiorefineryDomsjö Fabriker - The unique Biorefinery
Domsjö Fabriker - The unique BiorefinerySIANI
 
BIOMASS as renewable energy resource
BIOMASS as renewable energy resourceBIOMASS as renewable energy resource
BIOMASS as renewable energy resourceUzair Khan
 
Bio Energy Presentation
Bio Energy PresentationBio Energy Presentation
Bio Energy Presentationlaipeng
 
Biomass energy ppt
Biomass energy pptBiomass energy ppt
Biomass energy pptSann Jana
 

Viewers also liked (7)

Hugh McLaughlin - Biochar Workshop
Hugh McLaughlin - Biochar WorkshopHugh McLaughlin - Biochar Workshop
Hugh McLaughlin - Biochar Workshop
 
UPM's novel bio based forest products
UPM's novel bio based forest productsUPM's novel bio based forest products
UPM's novel bio based forest products
 
Domsjö Fabriker - The unique Biorefinery
Domsjö Fabriker - The unique BiorefineryDomsjö Fabriker - The unique Biorefinery
Domsjö Fabriker - The unique Biorefinery
 
Biomass presentation by Mr. Hauber 2013
Biomass presentation by Mr. Hauber 2013Biomass presentation by Mr. Hauber 2013
Biomass presentation by Mr. Hauber 2013
 
BIOMASS as renewable energy resource
BIOMASS as renewable energy resourceBIOMASS as renewable energy resource
BIOMASS as renewable energy resource
 
Bio Energy Presentation
Bio Energy PresentationBio Energy Presentation
Bio Energy Presentation
 
Biomass energy ppt
Biomass energy pptBiomass energy ppt
Biomass energy ppt
 

Similar to Preparation and Plant-growth Efficiency Assessment of Biochars

Effect of Global Warming on Soil Organic Carbon
Effect of Global Warming on Soil Organic CarbonEffect of Global Warming on Soil Organic Carbon
Effect of Global Warming on Soil Organic CarbonAmruta Raut
 
Review Article: Effect of Biochar on Growth and Yield of Agricultural Produce
Review Article: Effect of Biochar on Growth and Yield of Agricultural ProduceReview Article: Effect of Biochar on Growth and Yield of Agricultural Produce
Review Article: Effect of Biochar on Growth and Yield of Agricultural ProduceAgriculture Journal IJOEAR
 
C reservoir &amp; c cycle
C reservoir &amp; c cycleC reservoir &amp; c cycle
C reservoir &amp; c cycleAnkudas
 
Effect of global warming on soil organic Carbon
Effect of global warming on soil organic CarbonEffect of global warming on soil organic Carbon
Effect of global warming on soil organic CarbonP.K. Mani
 
Impact of carbon sequestration on soil and crop productivity
Impact of carbon sequestration on soil and crop productivityImpact of carbon sequestration on soil and crop productivity
Impact of carbon sequestration on soil and crop productivityPravash Chandra Moharana
 
Auwae and Groffman, 2010
Auwae and Groffman, 2010Auwae and Groffman, 2010
Auwae and Groffman, 2010Russell Auwae
 
BRIEF ASCEPTS IN CARBON STOCK, CARBON POOLS AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIA...
BRIEF ASCEPTS IN CARBON STOCK, CARBON POOLS AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIA...BRIEF ASCEPTS IN CARBON STOCK, CARBON POOLS AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIA...
BRIEF ASCEPTS IN CARBON STOCK, CARBON POOLS AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIA...RJSREBCRAN
 
Compost use mitigates climate change
Compost use mitigates climate changeCompost use mitigates climate change
Compost use mitigates climate changeSyahrul Belantara
 
Soil Carbon & its Sequestration for Better Soil Health
Soil Carbon & its Sequestration for Better Soil HealthSoil Carbon & its Sequestration for Better Soil Health
Soil Carbon & its Sequestration for Better Soil HealthBiswajitPramanick4
 
Contribution of greenhouse gas emissions: animal agriculture in perspective
Contribution of greenhouse gas emissions: animal agriculture in perspectiveContribution of greenhouse gas emissions: animal agriculture in perspective
Contribution of greenhouse gas emissions: animal agriculture in perspectiveLPE Learning Center
 
A presentation on effect on greenhouse gas
A presentation on effect on greenhouse gasA presentation on effect on greenhouse gas
A presentation on effect on greenhouse gasNitish Xavier Tirkey
 
Soil carbon sequestration resulting from biosolids application,
Soil carbon sequestration resulting from biosolids application, Soil carbon sequestration resulting from biosolids application,
Soil carbon sequestration resulting from biosolids application, Silvana Torri
 
The Diurnal Variation of Biotic and Abiotic Factors of Autotrophic and Hetero...
The Diurnal Variation of Biotic and Abiotic Factors of Autotrophic and Hetero...The Diurnal Variation of Biotic and Abiotic Factors of Autotrophic and Hetero...
The Diurnal Variation of Biotic and Abiotic Factors of Autotrophic and Hetero...Ryan Bourgart
 
Carbon dynamics_Switchgrass
Carbon dynamics_SwitchgrassCarbon dynamics_Switchgrass
Carbon dynamics_SwitchgrassBenjamin Baril
 
FinalPaperTemplate
FinalPaperTemplateFinalPaperTemplate
FinalPaperTemplatePrianka Ball
 
soilsystems-02-00051.pdf
soilsystems-02-00051.pdfsoilsystems-02-00051.pdf
soilsystems-02-00051.pdfRizzalynYusop1
 
and Solutions of Global Warming.docx
and Solutions of Global Warming.docxand Solutions of Global Warming.docx
and Solutions of Global Warming.docxwrite22
 

Similar to Preparation and Plant-growth Efficiency Assessment of Biochars (20)

Effect of Global Warming on Soil Organic Carbon
Effect of Global Warming on Soil Organic CarbonEffect of Global Warming on Soil Organic Carbon
Effect of Global Warming on Soil Organic Carbon
 
Review Article: Effect of Biochar on Growth and Yield of Agricultural Produce
Review Article: Effect of Biochar on Growth and Yield of Agricultural ProduceReview Article: Effect of Biochar on Growth and Yield of Agricultural Produce
Review Article: Effect of Biochar on Growth and Yield of Agricultural Produce
 
C reservoir &amp; c cycle
C reservoir &amp; c cycleC reservoir &amp; c cycle
C reservoir &amp; c cycle
 
Effect of global warming on soil organic Carbon
Effect of global warming on soil organic CarbonEffect of global warming on soil organic Carbon
Effect of global warming on soil organic Carbon
 
Impact of carbon sequestration on soil and crop productivity
Impact of carbon sequestration on soil and crop productivityImpact of carbon sequestration on soil and crop productivity
Impact of carbon sequestration on soil and crop productivity
 
Williams J etal 2016 P&S
Williams J etal 2016 P&SWilliams J etal 2016 P&S
Williams J etal 2016 P&S
 
Auwae and Groffman, 2010
Auwae and Groffman, 2010Auwae and Groffman, 2010
Auwae and Groffman, 2010
 
BRIEF ASCEPTS IN CARBON STOCK, CARBON POOLS AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIA...
BRIEF ASCEPTS IN CARBON STOCK, CARBON POOLS AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIA...BRIEF ASCEPTS IN CARBON STOCK, CARBON POOLS AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIA...
BRIEF ASCEPTS IN CARBON STOCK, CARBON POOLS AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIA...
 
Compost use mitigates climate change
Compost use mitigates climate changeCompost use mitigates climate change
Compost use mitigates climate change
 
Soil Carbon & its Sequestration for Better Soil Health
Soil Carbon & its Sequestration for Better Soil HealthSoil Carbon & its Sequestration for Better Soil Health
Soil Carbon & its Sequestration for Better Soil Health
 
Contribution of greenhouse gas emissions: animal agriculture in perspective
Contribution of greenhouse gas emissions: animal agriculture in perspectiveContribution of greenhouse gas emissions: animal agriculture in perspective
Contribution of greenhouse gas emissions: animal agriculture in perspective
 
A presentation on effect on greenhouse gas
A presentation on effect on greenhouse gasA presentation on effect on greenhouse gas
A presentation on effect on greenhouse gas
 
Soil carbon sequestration resulting from biosolids application,
Soil carbon sequestration resulting from biosolids application, Soil carbon sequestration resulting from biosolids application,
Soil carbon sequestration resulting from biosolids application,
 
The Diurnal Variation of Biotic and Abiotic Factors of Autotrophic and Hetero...
The Diurnal Variation of Biotic and Abiotic Factors of Autotrophic and Hetero...The Diurnal Variation of Biotic and Abiotic Factors of Autotrophic and Hetero...
The Diurnal Variation of Biotic and Abiotic Factors of Autotrophic and Hetero...
 
72nd annual swcs conferance madison july 2017
72nd annual swcs conferance madison july 201772nd annual swcs conferance madison july 2017
72nd annual swcs conferance madison july 2017
 
Carbon dynamics_Switchgrass
Carbon dynamics_SwitchgrassCarbon dynamics_Switchgrass
Carbon dynamics_Switchgrass
 
FinalPaperTemplate
FinalPaperTemplateFinalPaperTemplate
FinalPaperTemplate
 
Healy 2012.pdf
Healy 2012.pdfHealy 2012.pdf
Healy 2012.pdf
 
soilsystems-02-00051.pdf
soilsystems-02-00051.pdfsoilsystems-02-00051.pdf
soilsystems-02-00051.pdf
 
and Solutions of Global Warming.docx
and Solutions of Global Warming.docxand Solutions of Global Warming.docx
and Solutions of Global Warming.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea DevelopmentUsing Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Developmentchesterberbo7
 
Team Lead Succeed – Helping you and your team achieve high-performance teamwo...
Team Lead Succeed – Helping you and your team achieve high-performance teamwo...Team Lead Succeed – Helping you and your team achieve high-performance teamwo...
Team Lead Succeed – Helping you and your team achieve high-performance teamwo...Association for Project Management
 
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptxROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptxVanesaIglesias10
 
week 1 cookery 8 fourth - quarter .pptx
week 1 cookery 8  fourth  -  quarter .pptxweek 1 cookery 8  fourth  -  quarter .pptx
week 1 cookery 8 fourth - quarter .pptxJonalynLegaspi2
 
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdfMS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdfMr Bounab Samir
 
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4JOYLYNSAMANIEGO
 
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptxmary850239
 
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 
Scientific Writing :Research Discourse
Scientific  Writing :Research  DiscourseScientific  Writing :Research  Discourse
Scientific Writing :Research DiscourseAnita GoswamiGiri
 
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptxQ4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptxlancelewisportillo
 
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptxUnraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptxDhatriParmar
 
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfGrade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfJemuel Francisco
 
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptxMan or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptxDhatriParmar
 
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdfICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdfVanessa Camilleri
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptxmary850239
 
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped dataMeasures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped dataBabyAnnMotar
 
Mental Health Awareness - a toolkit for supporting young minds
Mental Health Awareness - a toolkit for supporting young mindsMental Health Awareness - a toolkit for supporting young minds
Mental Health Awareness - a toolkit for supporting young mindsPooky Knightsmith
 
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea DevelopmentUsing Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
Using Grammatical Signals Suitable to Patterns of Idea Development
 
Team Lead Succeed – Helping you and your team achieve high-performance teamwo...
Team Lead Succeed – Helping you and your team achieve high-performance teamwo...Team Lead Succeed – Helping you and your team achieve high-performance teamwo...
Team Lead Succeed – Helping you and your team achieve high-performance teamwo...
 
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptxROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
 
week 1 cookery 8 fourth - quarter .pptx
week 1 cookery 8  fourth  -  quarter .pptxweek 1 cookery 8  fourth  -  quarter .pptx
week 1 cookery 8 fourth - quarter .pptx
 
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdfMS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
 
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
 
prashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Profession
prashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Professionprashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Profession
prashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Profession
 
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
 
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 
Scientific Writing :Research Discourse
Scientific  Writing :Research  DiscourseScientific  Writing :Research  Discourse
Scientific Writing :Research Discourse
 
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptxQ4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
 
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptxUnraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptx
 
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfGrade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
 
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptxMan or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
 
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdfICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
 
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptxINCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
 
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped dataMeasures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
Measures of Position DECILES for ungrouped data
 
Mental Health Awareness - a toolkit for supporting young minds
Mental Health Awareness - a toolkit for supporting young mindsMental Health Awareness - a toolkit for supporting young minds
Mental Health Awareness - a toolkit for supporting young minds
 
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 

Preparation and Plant-growth Efficiency Assessment of Biochars

  • 1. 國立屏東科技大學熱帶農業暨國際合作系 Department of Tropical Agriculture and International Cooperation National Pingtung University of Science and Technology 博士學位論文 Ph.D. Dissertation Preparation and Plant-growth Efficiency Assessment of Biochars 指導教授: 黃武章(Wu-Jang, Huang) 研究生: 歐蒂娣(Odette Marie Varela Milla) 中華民國102年05 月16日 May 16, 2013
  • 2. 2 General Introduction Literature Review Identifying the Advantages of Using MSW Bottom Ash in Combination with Rice Husk and Bamboo Biochar Mixtures as Soil Modifiers: Enhancement of the Release of Polyphenols from a Carbon Matrix Feasibility Study using Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash and Biochar from Binary Mixtures of Organic Waste as Agronomic Materials Agronomic Properties and Characterization of Rice Husk and Wood Biochars and their Effect on the Growth of Water Spinach in a Field Test The Effects of Rice Husk Biochar and its Silicon Content on Corn (Zea mays L.) Growth Effects of Pyrolyzation Temperature of Bamboo Biochars on the Germination and Growth Rates of Zea Mays L. and Brassica Rapa
  • 3. 3
  • 4.
  • 5. Definition: ▪ Biochar is commonly defined as charred organic matter, produced with the intent to deliberately apply to soils to sequester carbon and improve soil properties (Lehmann and Joseph, 2009). Organic Matters (Wastes) Carbonization Bio-Char ? Activation Activated Carbon 5
  • 6. 6 Biochar Charcoal Biochar vs. charcoal Feedstock Unlike regular charcoal creation, biochar creation helps mitigate climate change via carbon sequestration, increasing soil fertility in the process
  • 7. Motivation 7 Biochar research is in its first steps and as such, substantially more data is required before robust predictions can be made regarding the effects of biochar application to soils, across a range of soils, climatic, and land management factors. Concomitant with carbon sequestration, biochar is intended to improve soil properties and soil functioning relevant to agronomic and environmental performance. Hypothesized mechanisms were suggested but are not very clearly, for potential improvement water and nutrient retention (as well as improved soil structure, drainage) would be mainly enhanced. Considering the multi-dimensional and crosscutting nature of biochar, an imminent need is anticipated for a strong and balanced scientific review to effectively inform policy development on the current state of knowledge with reference to biochar application to soils.
  • 8. Activated carbon: (Material) charcoal for application to soil (noun). Charcoal produced to optimize its reactive surface area (e.g. by using steam during pyrolysis). Anthrosol: (count noun) A soil that has been modified profoundly through human activities, such as addition of organic materials or household wastes, irrigation and cultivation. Biochar: (Concept) “charcoal (biomass that has been pyrolyzed in a zero or low oxygen environment) for which, owing to its inherent properties, scientific consensus exists that application to soil at a specific site is expected to sustainably sequester carbon and concurrently improve soil functions. Black carbon: (noun) All C‐rich residues from fire or heat (including from coal, gas or petrol). 8
  • 9. Black Earth: (mass noun) Term synonymous with Chernozem used (e.g. in Australia) to describe self‐mulching black clays. Char: (mass noun) 1. Synonym of ‘charcoal’; 2. charred organic matter as a result of wildfire (verb) synonym of the term ‘pyrolyze’ . Charcoal: (mass noun) charred organic matter. Chernozem: (count noun) A black soil rich in organic matter; from the Russian ‘chernij’ meaning ‘black’ and ‘zemlja’ meaning ‘earth’ or ‘land’. 9
  • 10. Coal: (mass noun) Combustible black or dark brown rock consisting chiefly of carbonized plant matter, found mainly in underground seams and used as fuel. Organic carbon: (noun) biology C that was originally part of an organism; (chemistry) C that is bound to at least one hydrogen (H) atom. Terra Preta: (noun) Colloquial term for a kind of Anthrosol where charcoal (or biochar) has been applied to soil along with many other materials, including pottery shards, turtle shells, animal and fish bones, etc. 10
  • 11. 11 Carbon sequestration potential of biochar The global flux of CO2 from soils to the atmosphere is in the region of 60 Gt of C per year. The black numbers indicate how much carbon is stored in various reservoirs, in billions of tons (GtC = Gigatons of Carbon). The purple numbers indicate how much carbon moves between reservoirs each year, i.e. the fluxes. The sediments, as defined in this diagram, do not include the ~70 million GtC of carbonate rock and kerogen (NASA, 2008). Figure 2.1 Diagram of the carbon cycle. (NASA, 2008). The principle of using biochar for carbon (C) sequestration is related to the role of soils in the C-cycle. This CO2 is mainly the result of microbial respiration within the soil system as the microbes decompose soil organic matter (SOM).
  • 12. 12 Objectives  To generate biochars from organic wastes, to analyze their concept and origins, to investigate their key roles on agriculture application, at the same time we aim to study the effect of production process on plant germination rate and their potential uses with other industrial solid wastes, such as bottom ash.
  • 13. 13
  • 14. CO2 World carbon dioxide emissions are expected to increase by 1.9 percent annually between 2001 and 2025 N2O Nitrous oxide (5 percent of total emissions), meanwhile, is emitted from burning fossil fuels and through the use of certain fertilizers and industrial processes. CH4 Methane, comes from landfills, coal mines, oil and gas operations, and agriculture; it represents 9 percent of total emissions. 14
  • 15. 15 In a study by Rondon et al. (2007), biochar addition to soils has been shown to reduce the emission of both CH4 and N2O. They reported that a near complete suppression of methane upon biochar addition at an application rate of 2% w w-1 These results indicate that the effect of biochar additions to soils on the N cycle depend greatly on the associated changes in soil hydrology and those thresholds of water content effects on N2O production may be very important and would have to be studied for a variety of soil-biochar-climate conditions.
  • 16. 16 Other relevant minerals can occur in the biomass, such as silicon (Si), which occurs in the cell walls, mostly in the form of silica (SiO2). Making biochar from biomass waste materials should create no competition for land with any other land use option such as food production or leaving the land in its pristine state. Biochar can and should be made from biomass waste materials.
  • 17. 17 Pyrolysis is the chemical decomposition of an organic substance by heating in the absence of oxygen. Pyrolysis occurs spontaneously at high temperatures (generally above approximately 300°C for wood, with the specific temperature varying with material). It occurs in nature when vegetation is exposed to wildfires or comes into contact with lava from volcanic eruptions. At its most extreme, pyrolysis leaves only carbon as the residue and is called carbonization Source: www.carbonzero.ch
  • 18. Table 2.1 Mean of post-pyrolysis feedstock residues resulting from different temperatures and residence times (IEA, 2007). Mode Conditions Liquid Biochar Syngas Fast pyrolysis Moderate temperature, ~ 500°C, short hot vapor residence time of ~ 1 s 75% 12% 13% Intermediate Pyrolysis Moderate temperature, ~ 500°C, moderate hot vapor residence time of 10 - 20 s 50% 20% 30% Slow Pyrolysis (Carbonization) Low temperature, ~ 400°C, very long solids residence time 30% 35% 35% Gasification High temperature, ~ 800°C, very long vapor residence time 5% 10% 85% 18 With regard to the use of biochar as a soil amendment and for climate change mitigation it is clear that slow pyrolysis, would be preferable, as this maximizes the yield of char, the most stable of the pyrolysis final products.
  • 19. 19 The design was handed for mechanical construction and assembly to a company in Pingtung City and was completed on May 2010. This system was able to pyrolyze from 1 to 3kg of biomass (wood pellets, rice husk, and others) per run. The batch reactor vessel is a stainless steel horizontal tube with a diameter of 60 cm x 90 cm. (1) Smoke chimney, (2a) stainless steel mixing arm, (2b) biochar mixing discs, (3) Reactor cover, (4) stainless steel pyrolysis drum, (5) temperature sensor, (6) stainless steel tube inserted in reactor wall perforation passed though (7) valve for sensor (placed in the lowest point of the reactor, inside drum reaching floor and fire flame), (8) gas tank, (9) gas-reactor valve, (10) gas feeder tube, (11) fire plate, (12) reactor wheels.
  • 20. 20 (a) Front view of biochar reactor, (b) Movable capsule inside the reactor, it separates the fire and the biomass during pyrolysis, (c) Temperature sensor, can reach 1000 C∘, (d) Flat cover avoids oxygen exchange, (e) Concave cover goes after flat cover, helps to direct the smoke emitted while charring to the excess pipe, (f) Reactor cover and excess pipe, (g) valve used to insert temperature sensor during pyrolysis, (h) Inside of reactor, (i) We count with 2 reactors for our research. (a) Dried muskmelon waste, (b) Muskmelon waste inside of the reactor, (c) Reactor feed by gas, (d) and (e) Flat and concave covers, we can observe how the charcoal is adhered to the flat cover after pyrolysis process, (f) Reactor after biochar production, (g) Final product: muskmelon biochar.
  • 21. Biochar production from muskmelon waste 1st test Initial weight 1.293 kg Final weight 0.447 kg Loss 0.846 kg Initial temperature 33∘C Final temperature 195∘C Time 96 minutes 21 1 tone of biomass gives 400 kg of biochar
  • 22. 22
  • 23. 23 Ideal biochar structure development with highest treatment temperature. (HTT): (a) increased proportion of aromatic C, highly disordered in amorphous mass; (b) growing sheets of conjugated aromatic carbon, turbostratically arranged; (c) structure becomes graphitic with order in the third dimension (Emmerich et al., 1987) 20μm 200μm The porous structure of biochar invites microbial colonization. Source: (left photo) S. Joseph; (right photo) Yamamoto, in Lehmann and Joseph (2009).
  • 24. 24 phenols phenolic acids flavonoids anthocyanins
  • 25. Polyphenols include several classes of compounds, such as phenols, phenolic acids, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and others, with more complex structures, tannins and lignins. The mixed combination of biochar and polyphenols applied at 1.5 % w/w to compost led to highest root yields (Jordan et al., 2011) Niggli and Schmidt (2010) tested biochar in Vineyards and found that grapes from biochar-treated plots had a 10% higher polyphenol content. Together with the much higher amino acid content, this was an indication of a greater aromatic quality of the grapes, which is then passed into the wine. 18
  • 26. Agricultural profitability Management of pollution and eutrophication risk to the environment Restoration of degraded land Sequestration of C from the atmosphere 26 The purpose of applying biochar to soil mainly falls into four broad categories:
  • 27. 27
  • 28.
  • 29. 29  To investigate the value of biochar and MSWIBA mixtures as soil modifiers and determine their effects on plant growth, root yield and the dry biomass weight of corn (Zea mays L.). And to find advantages to the addition of biochar to the BA.
  • 30. 30 Polyphenolic compounds are the most important types of secondary metabolites that perform an important role in the biosynthesis process (Bennet and Wallsgrove, 1994). Natural polyphenols are necessary compounds in the stimulus of plant development and growth. Stimulus or inhibition capacity on plant growth and development is closely correlated with the concentration of Polyphenolic compounds used (Anghel, 2001). In some cases, the presence of these compounds in low concentrations can have a favorable effect on plant development. In other cases, when concentrations are high, there is an inhibition effect (Popa et al., 2007).
  • 31. 31
  • 33. 33
  • 34. 34
  • 35. 35 The soil sample used for this experiment was collected from the National Pingtung University of Science and Technology field. “Ultisol” clay type, is an acidic soil with a pH of 4.02, organic matter (OM) 1.33, clay content 7%, silt 72%, sand 21%, organic carbon (OC) 0.77. In terms of increasing plant growth, biochar with various pore sizes may be best suited to enhancing the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of soils.
  • 36. 36
  • 37. 37 Each biochar was mixed separately with soil and bottom ash. Trays were filled with either soil or soil-biochar- bottom ash mixtures, randomly placed on net house benches and watered before sowing the seeds. For each bottom ash test, 7 pots were used with 4 replicates each (n=4) Mixtures: 1- soil, 2- bottom ash + soil, 3- bottom ash + rice husk 400, 4- bottom ash + rice husk 500, 5- bottom ash + bamboo 300, 6- bottom ash + bamboo 600 and 7- bottom ash. Plants were harvested after one month. They were cleaned, and washed with DI water. Excessive water was removed to later obtain the total weight.
  • 38. Plants were washed, cut into small pieces and dried in an oven at 65°C for 72 h. The dried material was ground and passed through a 250 Hm sieve mesh. The total phenolics were determined according to the Folin-Ciocalteau method (Rossi, 1965; Waterhouse, 2002; Koffi et al., 2007). The samples were filtered through a 0.45 mm Millipore syringe filter The total phenolics in the filtrate were determined colorimetrically. A volume of 100 mL of filtrate was added to 900 mL of distilled water, and 5 mL of 0.2 N Folin– Ciocalteau reagent was mixed. Absorbance was read at 750 nm with a UV/VIs-105 Genesys spectrophotometer (Thermo, USA). The total phenolic content of the samples were calibrated using catechins mono-compound and was expressed as parts per million and converted to (mg/L). All measurements were performed in duplicate. 38
  • 39. Heavy metal analysis (ICP) was carried out to identify the properties of the different bottom ashes used. The leaching extraction procedure followed USA EPA method # 1311 with minor modifications (EPA, 1990). Five grams of ground and weighed bottom ash were put in a volumetric flask together with 1000 ml of distilled water and 5.7 ml of acetic acid. Samples were left for 18 h in a toxicity characteristics leaching procedure (TCLP) rotator. After this procedure, samples where filtered and analyzed through a Perkin-Elmer 3000-XL inductively coupled plasma (ICP-AES) spectrometer. 39
  • 40. The contents determined by ICP showed that bottom ash from the three different cities did not differ from each other in most of the elements. There were differences in only four elements: Calcium > Lead > Sodium > Iron (Ca > Pb > Na > Fe>). Calcium constituted the largest proportion of the elements present in the bottom The pH of the bottom ash, when mixed with water, was as follows: Pingtung = 4.92, Chiayi = 6.63 and Chunghua = 6.59. There was not a high reduction in pH after leaching of metals. 40 Elements Pingtung Chiayi Changhua mg/L Fe 285.3 - - Al 54.3 - - Si 74.7 48.5 38.6 Pb 317.0 0.0 0.1 Zn 107.3 6.7 39.4 Cd - - 0.0 Ni 0.7 0.2 0.3 Cr 0.9 0.0 - Na 69.5 290.0 173.3 K 18.9 109.5 65.8 Sb 1.6 0.2 0.2 Ca 1099.0 2392.0 2481.0 Mn 11.6 3.2 3.1 Mg 30.2 49.9 47.7 Sr 3.5 6.2 5.9 Ba 0.5 0.6 0.5 Cu 2.0 2.5 4.1 “‐” means not detectable.
  • 41. 41 Bottom ash treatments Pingtung Chiayi Chunghua Mixed matrix % of germination NF F NF F NF F 1 Soil 90 45 80 90 95 95 2 Bottom ash + soil 80 95 55 50 45 70 3 Bottom ash + rice husk 400 100 100 75 70 85 90 4 Bottom ash + rice husk 500 95 95 75 80 80 70 5 Bottom ash + bamboo 300 90 95 70 80 85 70 6 Bottom ash + bamboo 600 90 100 75 35 75 85 7 Bottom ash 65 70 - - - - NF= no fertilizer was applied, F= use of fertilizer. Germination results in treatments of bottom ash binary mixtures showed that the treatment with the most consistent results was the one source in Pingtung City. Rice husk biochar (400ºC) presented the highest germination percentage in all treatments having no differences among fertilizer applications and non-applications, followed by bottom ash + rice husk 500, bottom ash + bamboo 300 and bottom ash + bamboo 600. Treatments with soil+biochar+bottom ash gave better germination percentage than those were only soil was used or in combination of bottom ash showing seed germination inhibition. Inhibition effect may perhaps have some explanations: in this study the inhibiting effect of bottom ash on seed germination was tested at high concentrations, such as to reduce the germination percentage
  • 42. 42 In our results of plant growth we found differences among the 3 sources of bottom ash in combinations with biochars (Figure a,b and c). Pingtung showed the best results with differences among treatments and fertilizer applications (Bottom ash + IRRI 400 °C), bottom ash applied alone showed inhibition in plant growth. The lowest average was observed in Chunghua bottom ash (Figure (c)). Plant size of MSWI bottom ash and biochar mixed matrix treatments. (a), (b) and (c), graphs show the differences between the three sources of bottom ash and their combinations with biochar with and without additions of fertilizer.
  • 43. 43 We proposed that this interaction might decrease the use of fertilizer in agricultural soils. Therefore, the application of the mixed matrix of bottom ash and biochar is ideal for these types of soils as an organic fertilizer amendment and and also for its polyphenol content. From the analysis performed, polyphenols released from a BA/biochar mixture were found to have a linear relationship with the stem size quantified in plants (see Figure 3.2). We also observed that the biomass weight was proportional to the polyphenol amount (Figure 3.3).
  • 44. With these results, we can state that bottom ash can be used in combination with biochar. When these materials are mixed the generation of polyphenols increases. Since the mixed matrix of bottom ash and biochar releases a large amount of polyphenols, the use of fertilizer is not needed. We found that the use of fertilizer on the BA/biochar mixture had a negative effect on plant growth. Therefore, when assessing the efficiency of applying biochar, the fertilizer should not be added, given that the use of fertilizers increases the release of polyphenols inhibiting plant growth. When measuring root length and comparing it to the addition of fertilizer, we observed that root length decreased in the fertilized region (see Figure 3.4). Effect of polyphenol on plant dried biomass tissue before and after addition of fertilizer. Effects of polyphenol on plant dried biomass tissue before and after addition of fertilizer where Chunghua bottom ash was applied
  • 45. 45
  • 46. 46
  • 47. 47  To quantify the impact of: (1) rice husk biochar (RHB) with MSWI bottom ash and (2) bamboo biochar (BB) with MSWI bottom ash during germination and development of maize seedlings, as well as plant growth and amount of biomass produced.  To determine if the mixtures prepared for this study may have had a positive effect on the development of maize seedlings; therefore, the use of binary mixtures of bottom ash and biochar for plant growth may be feasible in Taiwan.
  • 48. 48
  • 49. 49
  • 50. 50 Different types of MSWI bottom ash were obtained at a processing facility located in Pingtung County. Bottom ash from three different cities (Pingtung, Chiayi and Chunghua City) was collected and was air dried for 3 days at room temperature Then it was sieved using two mesh sizes (mesh 1- 19.10 mm and mesh 2- 4.700 mm). The all kinds of ash particles, especially in the area of small particles, have a relatively big surface area, porous surface, and for this reason they could have a huge absorptions capacity. Two different feedstocks were used to produce the biochars used in this report: rice husks and bamboo. each material was generated at different temperatures. The rice husks from the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) - 400ºC, rice husk biochar from the Asahi Company - 500ºC. Bamboo Biochar from the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) - 300ºC and 600ºC. All biochars were obtained by pyrolysis.
  • 51. 51 For the plant growth test, one pot was used for each of the binary mixtures. In total, seven pots were used for each one of the four treatments for the three different locations Each biochar was mixed separately with soil and bottom ash. Trays were filled with either soil or soil-biochar-bottom ash mixtures, randomly placed on net house benches and watered before sowing the seeds. Prior to planting in pots, a germination test was performed. Thirty maize seeds (Zea mays L.) were sown into germination trays using one tray for each of the different test Teatments (M1+F=Mesh 1 with fertilizer, M1/wF=Mesh 1 without fertilizer, M2+F=Mesh 2 with fertilizer and M2/wF= Mesh 2 without fertilizer). Trays were watered daily. Germination percentages were recorded between days 5 and 10 after sowing. (M1WF=Mesh 1 with fertilizer, M1NF=Mesh 1 without fertilizer, M2WF=Mesh 2 with fertilizer and M2NF=Mesh 2 without fertilizer). Pots were prepared and seeds were sown at a depth of 2 cm Water was applied after sowing the seeds. Fertilizer (N-P-K) was added 2 days after germination Data are presented only for the 7th day of sowing corresponding to peak germination. Plants were harvested after one month and washed with DI water. Excess water was removed and the total fresh weight was measured.
  • 52. Material Quantity (g) Soil 100% 474.0 Soil 50% 237.0 Bottom ash (19.10 mesh) - 100% 518.0 Bottom ash (19.10 mesh) - 25% 129.5 Bottom ash (4.700 mesh) - 100% 497.0 Bottom ash (4.700 mesh) - 25% 124.25 Bamboo 300 - 100% 154.0 Bamboo 300 - 25% 38.5 Bamboo 600 - 100% 16.01 Bamboo 600 - 25% 40.5 RH 400 - 100% 129.0 RH 400 - 25% 32.25 RH 500 - 100% 45.0 RH 500 - 25% 11.25 Pot size 142.70 cm3 52 Heavy metal analysis (ICP) was carried out to identify the properties of the different bottom ashes and biochar used. We examined the effect and the interaction of rice husk biochar, bamboo biochar and MSWI bottom ash on the germination and growth of maize plants. Accumulation of trace elements in plant tissue was measured using Atomic- Absorption Spectroscopy (AA).
  • 53. 53 The first aim of our research is to determine whether adding biochar to soil has an effect on seed germination. The following results have been seen in previous experiments for rice husk biochar applications: a) increased the soil pH, thus increasing phosphorus (P), b) enhanced aeration in the crop root zone c) enhanced the water-holding capacity of the soil and d) improved exchangeable potassium (K) and magnesium (Mg) levels (FFTC, 2001). It has been found that when incorporated with sludge composting, bamboo biochar is an effective fertilizer reducing nitrogen loss in the soil (Hua et al., 2009). The positive outcome was linked to the high adsorption capacity of biochar particles during the composting process (Dias et al., 2007). In similar research, Asada et al., (2002) found that bamboo biochar is effective in absorbing ammonia in soils. This was attributed to acidic functional groups being formed as an effect of thermolysis of cellulose and lignin at temperatures of 400 and 500°C (Lehmann and Joseph, 2007).
  • 54. Our preliminary results in plant germination showed that application into the soil of rice husk biochar and bamboo biochar in combination with MSWI bottom ash without fertilizer differs slightly from the mixtures where fertilizer was used This suggests that the application of fertilizer to the binary mixture did not cause any impact in the germination of Zea mays L. seeds. This effect was attributed to the high content of beneficial nutrients already present in bottom ashes and possibly to the efficient absorption of heavy metals. While the use of two different meshes used for the bottom ash in this experiment (19.10 (Mesh 1) and 4.700 (Mesh 2)) did not have any influence on the germination results From the three different cities, the bottom ash binary mixture with the most consistent results was the one source in Pingtung City. Rice husk biochar (400ºC) presented the highest germination percentage (100%) in all treatments 54
  • 55. 55
  • 56. 56 Plant total weight (kg) Treatments 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0.040 0.035 0.030 0.025 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 Plant weight Pingtung BA-M1WF 0.025 0.034 0.024 0.029 0.031 0.013 Soil BA+S BA+ RH400 BA+ RH500 BA+ B300 BA+ B600 BA a) Plant weight Pingtung BA-M1NF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0.040 0.035 0.030 0.025 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 Plant total weight (kg) Treatments 0.009 0.011 0.027 0.021 0.023 0.024 0.011 Soil BA+S BA+ RH400 BA+ RH500 BA+ B300 BA+ B600 BA b) Plant weight Pingtung BA-M1WF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 c) 0.040 0.035 0.030 0.025 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 0.011 Plant total weight (kg) Treatments 0.021 0.009 0.029 0.022 0.021 0.009 Soil BA+S BA+ RH400 BA+ RH500 BA+ B300 BA+ B600 0.040 0.035 0.030 0.025 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 0.012 Plant total weight (kg) Plant weight Pingtung BA-M2NF BA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Treatments 0.013 0.014 0.027 0.018 0.010 0.014 Soil BA+S BA+ RH400 BA+ RH500 BA+ B300 BA+ B600 BA d) Pingtung BA‐M1WF = Pingtung bottom ash mesh 1 with fertilizer, b) Pingtung BA‐M1NF= Pingtung bottom ash mesh 1 without fertilizer, c) Pingtung BA‐M2WF= Pingtung bottom ash mesh 2 with fertilizer, d) Pingtung BA‐M2NF = Pingtung bottom ash mesh 2 without fertilizer. Error bars show standard deviation of data. Pingtung bottom ash (mesh 1 and 2, with and without fertilizer) biomass total weight. Figures b, c and d showing the best results in the application of the biochar-MSWI bottom ash binary mixture Were rice husk biochar (400 ºC) showed the highest weight in treatments with exception of “a”, were Pingtung BA-M1WF treatment BA+S (bottom ash with soil) showed the higher total weight.
  • 57. 57 To determine the total heavy metal content of the samples, bottom ash leaching samples were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES The contents determined by ICP showed that the different biochars had important element content that is beneficial for plant development. The contents determined by ICP showed that bottom ash from the three different cities did not differ from each other in most of the elements. There were differences in only four elements: Ca > Pb > Na > Fe. Calcium constituted the largest proportion of the elements present in the bottom ash with a high difference in the content between in Pingtung and Chiayi BA, and showing similar content between Chiayi and Changhua BA. The pH of the bottom ash, when mixed with water, was as follows: Pingtung = 4.92, Chiayi = 6.63 and Changhua = 6.59. There was not a high reduction in pH leaching of metals.
  • 58. 58 The bioaccumulations in tissue of Sr and Cu were higher than lead (Pb) contents in biomass tissue. Cooper (Cu) concentration was the highest in plants tissue with P1 F + BA + RH 500 (219.607 mg/L) followed by the use of P2 NF + BA + BAMBOO 300 (23.999 mg/L) and the use of P2 NF + BA + SOIL (24.446 mg/L) . According to Hong et al. (2008), bioaccumulation of elements in different parts of the plants varies both with the concentration of the elements and the type of vegetable. In this research, the bioaccumulation of elements in plan tissue was found in concentrations not permitted for food products according to Hong Kong Government Center for food safety (2011). Special attention should be placed into the bioaccumulation of Cu, since it was the heavy metal that accumulated in higher concentration.
  • 59. Treatments Pb(mg/L) Cu(mg/L) Sr(mg/L) P1 F + BA 4.064 0.06 3.506 P1 F + BA + BAMBOO 300 ND 0.56 3.637 P1 F + BA + BAMBOO 600 ND 0.096 4.244 P1 F + BA + RH 500 ND 219.607 5.083 P1 F + BA + RH 400 ND 3.717 3.243 P1 F + BA + SOIL 4.203 6.308 3.167 P1 NF + BA 7.375 0.624 5.56 P1 NF + BA + BAMBOO 300 ND 0.457 2.98 P1 NF + BA + BAMBOO 600 ND 1.78 2.674 P1 NF + BA + RH 500 ND 3.594 3.663 P1 NF + BA + RH 400 3.875 0.131 3.385 P1 NF + BA + SOIL ND 0.424 3.192 P1 NF + SOIL ND 3.962 2.643 P2 F + BA 4.569 5.311 5.12 P2 F + BA + BAMBOO 300 0.075 1.611 3.055 P2 F + BA + RH 500 4.121 1.267 2.974 P2 F + BA + RH 400 ND 1.969 2.824 P2 F + BA + SOIL 0.67 2.159 2.746 P2 F + BA +BAMBOO 600 1.378 0.947 3.365 P2 F + SOIL ND 2.059 2.431 P2 NF + BA + BAMBOO 300 4.187 23.999 2.763 P2 NF + BA + BAMBOO 600 ND 0.22 3.594 P2 NF + BA + RH 500 ND 2.173 2.789 P2 NF + BA + RH 400 2.253 2.237 2.498 P2 NF + BA + SOIL ND 24.446 3.018 P2 NF + SOIL ND 2.733 3.627 59 Table 4.5, shows results of Pb, Cu, and Sr analyzed for Pingtung bottom ash, due to its high plant growth on treatments P1= Pingtung mesh 1(19.10 m/m-) P2= Pingtung mesh 2 (4.700 m/m-), F= With addition of fertilizer NF= No fertilizer was used, BA= Bottom ash, RH 400 IRRI = Rice husk biochar pyrolyzed at 400°C RH 500 Company= Rice husk biochar pyrolyzed at 500°C Bamboo 300 = Bamboo biochar pyrolyzed at 300°C Bamboo 600 = Bamboo biochar pyrolyzed at 600°C.
  • 60. 60 ICP of Biochars RH RH 400 500 Bambo o 300 Bambo o 600 Elements mg/L Fe 77.4 3.36 0.462 1.02 Zn 5.07 0.64 5 0.569 0.97 Na NA 17.8 5.65 5.62 K 62.2 159 82 103.0 Ca 18.2 39.4 7.9 13.0 Mn 4.65 6.94 1.67 2.62 Mg 23 17.9 13.4 22.2 Cu 0.15 4 0.15 7 0.101 0.293 Elements Pingtung Chiayi Changhua mg/L Fe 285.3 Al 54.3 Si 74.7 48.5 38.6 Pb 317.0 0.0 0.1 Zn 107.3 6.7 39.4 Cd 0.0 Ni 0.7 0.2 0.3 Cr 0.9 0.0 Na 69.5 290.0 173.3 K 18.9 109.5 65.8 Sb 1.6 0.2 0.2 Ca 1099.0 2392.0 2481.0 Mn 11.6 3.2 3.1 Mg 30.2 49.9 47.7 Sr 3.5 6.2 5.9 Ba 0.5 0.6 0.5 Cu 2.0 2.5 4.1
  • 61. 61
  • 62. 62
  • 63. 63 To demonstrate that rice husk biochar could act as a soil conditioner, enhancing water spinach growth by supplying and retaining nutrients and thus improving the soil’s physical and biological properties. To explore whether rice husk biochar (RHB) and wood biochar (WB), in combination with fertilizers, could increase the biomass yield of water spinach. We hope that the results of our work may help to determine which of the biochars is more beneficial in boosting the production of water spinach.
  • 64. 64
  • 65. 65
  • 66. Production of rice husk biochar (RHB) was carried out by the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI), located in Hsinchu, Taiwan. RHB was pyrolized using a small-scale reactor at 300-350ºC with a residence time of 1 hour. These temperatures may be applicable for small scale farmers who lack access to credit and cannot afford high-scale pyrolysis plants. 66 In a study made by Hossain et al. (2011) concerning the influence of pyrolysis temperature on production and the nutrient properties of biochar, researchers concluded that pyrolysis temperature has a significant effect on the chemical properties of the biochar produced. Wood biochar (WB) was purchased in an agricultural shop near the experimental site and WB was prepared by open-burn (the proposed temperature was 250-300 ºC). In order to observe the performance of both biochars in their original shapes, we avoided the use of grinders or sieves to reduce the particle size in the soil applications.
  • 67. 67 By using an SEM S-3000N HITACHI production microscope, the morphology of both WB and RHB samples was examined A Perkins-Elmer EA analyzer determined the elemental composition of the biochar, such as the biomass that would be ideal for application as biochar for carbon sequestration. A Bruker Vector-22 FT-IR spectrometer identified the sample to determine the organic functional groups present for each biomass, especially carbons. Volatile matter in biochar was determined following the ASTM D 3175 -07 standard test method. A Beckman Coulter SA 3100 BET analyzer containing approximately 0.1000 g to 0.2000 g of each biochar sample was then used at a temperature of 50Cº for 60 to determine the surface area of each biochar. Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids were measured using a SUNTEX SC-110 portable conductivity-meter. The trace metals analysis in the samples was realized by using a Perkin-Elmer 3000- XL inductively coupled plasma (ICP-AES) spectrometer.
  • 68. Field trial The experiment was carried out between December 2010 and February 2011 on the campus of National Pingtung University of Science and Technology (22°38'N, 120°36'E) in Pingtung County in the southern part of Taiwan. Soil analysis Soil was sampled from a 0 to 20 cm horizon on a clayey Ultisol, which is typically used for vegetable and fruit production in southern Taiwan. 68
  • 69. Water spinach plants were germinated for two weeks and later transplanted into plots. Each plot was 1.94 m x 1.10 m. Five different treatments were assigned to each of the biochars and to one control group. RHB and WB were weighted and added to each plot. Every plot was mixed with the assigned quantity of biochar using the “top soil” mixing technique (Major, 2009). The effect of biochar on root growth was measured to compare the effects of the different types and quantities of rice husk and wood biochars used. After eight weeks of growth, the plants were harvested. Plant morphological characteristics measured included: leaf number, leaf length, leaf width, stem number, stem size, fresh plant weight, root growth and the chlorophyll content of the leaves Before transplanting, each plot was irrigated for 20 min. Plants were transplanted 15 cm apart, with 22 plants per plot. A perforated pipe system was used to water the plants every 2 days for 10 min. Soluble N-P-K fertilizer 20-20-20 was applied to the crops Relative chlorophyll content (Soil Plant Analysis Development (SPAD)) was measured every two days using a Minolta chlorophyll meter (model SPAD 502). 69
  • 70. 70 There were eleven treatments for rice husk biochar and wood biochar, along with one control group. Four soil samples from each treatment were dried in a precision oven at 35ºC, homogenously mixed, ground and passed through a 2mm sieve. A 20:20 (soil: distilled water) solution ration was prepared for the determination of pH. Organic carbon (OC) and organic matter (OM) were determined using the Walkley-Black method (Walkley and Black, 1934). Soil texture and characteristics were also obtained using the hydrometer method (Milford, 1997).
  • 71. 71 The SEM-EDX analysis showed that the microstructure of the rice husk biochar was highly heterogeneous Rice husk biochar particles consisted of higher silicon (Si) mineral agglomerates on lower carbon content fibers with structures typical of its biomass origin. They exhibited a large degree of macro-porosity in the 1 to 10 micron scale, with contents of carbon (C), oxygen (O) and potassium (K). On the other hand, SEM-EDX analysis for WB indicated that the biochar particles consisted of high potassium, and calcium mineral agglomerates.
  • 72. Elements evaluated Fresh rice husk Rice husk biochar Wood biochar Characteristics of materials T (⁰C) - 300 - 350 - Si (mg/kg) 107 171 10 Ca (mg/kg) 108 220 273 K (mg/kg) 9523 175 305 Mg (mg/kg) 175 182 72.23 Water (%) 11.3 3.9 - Ash (%) 12.63 50.53 - pH (%) 6.41 8.02 7.32 Elemental analysis Fixed C (mg) - 43.73 52.74 H (mg) - 2.38 3.58 N (mg) - 1.0 0.72 S (mg) - 0.19 0.37 O (mg) - 2.36 - VM Volatile Matter (%) 2.42 1.86 1.70 BET Surface Area Analysis (m²) - 2.21 37.95 Salinity EC (μs/cm) 1220 1392 704 TDS (ppm) 488 558 282 Sal (ppt) 0.2 0.2 0.1 Heavy metal analysis Fe (mg/L) - 8.72 0.1 Al (mg/L) - 0.97 0.37 Cu (mg/L) - 0.09 0.01 Pb (mg/L) - - - Zn (mg/L) - 0.7 0.4 Cd (mg/L) - - - Ni (mg/L) - 0.11 - Cr (mg/L) - 0.03 - Na (mg/L) - 7.49 23.9 Sb (mg/L) - - - 72 Results from several analyses, including: EA, BET surface area, EC, TDS, and ICP heavy metal analysis, revealed the applicability of rice husk and wood biochars on soil. Results from EA tests show a high percentage of carbon in wood biochar. According Stoylle (2011), a high percentage of carbon means the biochar can absorb more atmospheric C from the environment. Rice husk had a higher VM content as compared to rice husk and wood biochars. In comparison with rice husk, wood exhibits a larger BET surface Rice husk biochar has a area/m². significantly higher EC value than wood biochar, meaning greater quantities of dissolvable ions are present in rice husk biochar than in wood (Basile-Doelsch et al., 2007). Concentrations of heavy metals in the tested biochars were all far below the ICP detection limits. Major differences between wood and rice biochar were in the content of Sodium (Na) and Manganese (Mn).
  • 73. As indicated in Figure “a”, the WB added to soil increased the plant weight of water spinach by increasing the root size and leaf width; while the RHB added soil increased the plant weight of water spinach by increasing the stem size and leaf length as seen in figure “b”. 73 (a) The relations between root size and leaf wide and plant weight of WB and figure 5.5 (b), relations between stem size and leaf length and plant weight of RHB added plant samples.
  • 74. In Figure “a”, the stem size of water spinach is shown to be proportional to the WHC/silt ratio, while the root size of water spinach is proportional to the OM/OC 74 ratio, as shown in Figure “b”. (a) The relations between and WHC/silt ratio and stem size of RHB and WB added plant samples and figure 5.6 (b) relations between and OM/OC ratio and root size of RHB and WB added plant samples.
  • 75. Based on the changes in the silt and sand content in soil described in the figures, we can conclude that the decomposition of OC in biochar to soil OM resulting in the increase in WHC and the decreasing in silt is the mechanism of WB and RHB application. The stability of biochar is affected by pre-existing soil OM; the results indicate that the decomposition reaction of WB biochar is faster than that of RHB under a lower dosage amount (< 1.5 kgm3), while this reaction is inversed with an increased dosage ( > 3.0 kgm3). 75 (a) Changes of sand and silt content in the WB added soil and figure 5.7 (b) changes of sand and silt content in the RHB added soil.
  • 76. 76
  • 77. 77
  • 78. 78 To assess the potential effects biochar from rice husks pyrolized on Corn (Zea mays L.) seeds germination and plant growth.  To observe how the silicon content rice husk biochar could affect the development of the crop.
  • 79. 79 Rice-husk biochar has high silica (SiO2) contents and silicon (Si) is a beneficial element for plant growth that helps plants overcome multiple stresses including biotic and abiotic stresses. Silicon is effective in preventing rice lodging by increasing culm wall thickness and vascular bundle size (Shimoyama, 1958), thereby enhancing stem strength. Silicon plays an important role in increasing plant resistance to pathogens such as blast on rice (Datnoff et al., 1997) and powdery mildew on cucumbers (Miyake and Takahashi 1982). However, agronomists and farmers are not always aware that they could be able to improve crop production with increased stress and disease resistance by adding up a source of available silicon to the soil. Reports on the Si effect of rice husk biochar on plant seed germination are scant.
  • 80. Four rice husk biochars were used in this study IRRI ITRI biochar was prepared by the Industrial Technology Research Institute in a specialized biochar reactor Several analyses including scanning electron microscopy (SEM),X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), volatile matter (VM), electrical conductivity (EC), water holding capacity (WHC), and heavy metal analysis (ICP), were used to characterize the biochars properties. NPUST Shui-known
  • 81. 81 Treatment Percentage of combined materials pH of material s Pyrolysis Temperature IRRI-B 50% Soil+50% biochar 7.38 400Ԩ ITRI-B 50%Soil+50% biochar 8.02 500Ԩ NPUST-B 50%Soil+50% biochar 8.53 350Ԩ SK-B 50%Soil+50% biochar 10.04 700Ԩ DRH 50%Soil+50% rice husk 5.76 25Ԩ SOIL No soil amendment (control) 5.02 - SOIL-F Soil + fertilizer 6.00 - IRRI‐B = International rice research institute biochar, ITRI‐B = industrial technology research institute biochar, NPUST‐B = national pingtung university of science and technology biochar, SK‐B = shui‐known company biochar, DRH = dried rice husk, SOIL‐B = soil plus fertilizer.
  • 82. 82 These seven treatments were arranged in fully randomized design with 4 replications, each one of 10 plants in separated pots The amount of soil amendment applied (45g) was calculated based on the surface area of the plastic pot used ( 4.5 x 5.0 cm). The amendments were mixed to a 5 cm depth, after preparation they were placed in the net house and watered every two days. 10 plants (pots) were grouped together to make one plot for a total of 7 treatments x 4 replications x 10 plants (pots)/plot = total of 280 plants (or pots). The germination and growth of corn plants was performed for 15 days. The plants were harvested at the end of the growth period and kept under refrigeration to further analysis. X-ray (EDX) was used to examine the morphology and silicon content of dried rice husk and biochar rice husk samples. FT-IR was used for the identification of the organic functional groups present for each biomass, especially carbons and -OH- groups. Differences between biochar treatments were analyzed by one way ANOVA using Duncan and LSD tests for means comparisons where ANOVA showed significant differences between treatments.
  • 83. 83 The germination percentage for corn from the seven different treatments can be observed in figure 6.1(a). Germination started on the 3rd day after seeds were planted. Plants growth with biochar showed good development after germination. The treatment that showed the best germination was ITRI-B, which is a biochar produced by the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) Has a pH of 8.02 and was prepared at a temperature of 500Ԩ, unlike treatments with biochar additions from IRRI and SK, these treatments showed an inhibition in seeds germination Saeed A. Abro et al., in 2009, assessed the effects of different levels of Silicic acid on germination of wheat seeds, where 7.2g silicic acid Kg-1 was applied to treatments and decreased considerably the germination of wheat seeds, this shows that increased levels of silicic acid reduces the germination rate.
  • 84. Stem size mean for corn from the seven different treatments can be observed in figure 6.1(e). The treatment that showed the highest stem mean was SK-B, has a pH. Root development (figure 6.1f) was found to be significantly affected by the use of rice husk biochars in plants in comparison with soil and soil with fertilizer treatments According to the Anova mean comparison (figure 6.1g), the rice husks biochar treatments showed significantly higher weight than the rest of the biochars and soil treatments on biomass growth were NPUST-B and ITRI-B. Studies realized around the world, have shown that applying supplemental silicon can inhibit plant disease, decrease insect pests injuries, and improve crop tolerance to environmental stress (Heckman, 2012). In a similar research made by Sundahri et al., (2001) were found positive 84 effects of gypsum and sodium silicate on the wheat grown under waterlogged soils especially in increasing plant height leaf and shoot dry mass.
  • 85. 85 (d) (e) Scanning electron micrographs and EDX spectrograms of element particles found in raw rice husk and rice husk biochar from pyrolysis process at different temperatures: (a) in IRRI biochar, (b) in ITRI biochar, (c) in NPUST biochar, (d) in SK biochar and (e) in dry rice husk.
  • 86. 86 Germination Mean Silicon Weight (%) 29.84% 8.75 24.38% 4.75 26.86% 9.0 1.06% 10.0 35.24% 1 2 3 4 5 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 0 2 4 6 8 5.0 IRRI-B ITRI-B NPUST-B SK-B DRH Seeds germinated (mean) and Si weight percentage Treatments with biochar IRRI‐B = International rice research institute biochar, ITRI‐B = industrial technology research institute biochar, NPUST‐B = national pingtung university of science and technology biochar, SK‐B = shui‐known company biochar, DRH = dried rice husk. Relationship between germination mean versus Si content for the tested rice husk biochars.
  • 87. 87 The results detailing the growth of water spinach showed that the application of rice husk biochar improves biomass production, increased plant weight by increasing the stem size and leaf length of the water spinach. In addition, the stem size of water spinach was proportional to the WHC/silt ratio; whereas the root size of water spinach was proportional to the OM/OC ratio of soil. We also proposed that the working mechanism of RHB in soil would be such, that the decomposition of OC in biochar-added soil to OM resulted in increased WHC and decreased silt in biochar-added soil (Milla et al., 2013).
  • 88. 88
  • 89. 89
  • 90. 90  To show that bamboo wood is a smart option for those industries that want to transform biochar into a profit without harming any ecosystem.  To investigate the potential capability of bamboo biochar to affect germination and growth of edible crops.  To demonstrate the effects on germination of different temperatures (240oC, 300oC, 600oC and 700oC) of bamboo biochars used in this study.
  • 91. 91 Bamboo charcoal may be an ideal amendment for nutrient conservation and heavy metal stabilization due to its excellent adsorption capability. Recent research found that biochar could act as soil fertilizers or conditioners to increase crop yield and plant growth by supplying and retaining nutrients (Glaser et al., 2000; Major et al., 2005; Steiner et al., 2007). Bamboo biochar has been used in studies where the content of polyphenols released by the carbon matrix was measured, as well has been tested is combination with the same type of bottom ash as agronomic materials (Milla and Huang, 2013 & Milla, Wang and Huang, 2013). However, there has been no research to date on the effects of pyrolyzation temperatures of bamboo biochar in seed germination and plant growth. In this study we present the results of a germination test and growth parameters made with four different biochars, produced under different pyrolysis temperatures (240, 300, 600 and 700ºC) and evaluated at two rates of applications (1- 100 (10%) t/ha, calculated as soil volume to 10 cm soil depth, and 2- pure biochar without soil application).
  • 92. Biochar made from bamboo was used to produce the biochars applied in this test. Bamboo biochar was generated at different temperatures: 240, 300, 600 and 700ºC. All biochars were obtained by pyrolysis with a temperature raising rate of 5oC/min; biochars were sieved using a 4 mm sieve before use for the bioassays. Characterization of the material was made applying various test and analyses. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was carried out to identify any crystallographic structure in the four biochar samples Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy analysis (FT-IR) was used for the identification or fingerprint of a sample or solution to determine the organic functional groups. Heavy metal analysis (ICP) was carried out to identify the properties of the biochar used. A HITACHI S-3000N scanning electron microscope equipped an energy dispersion X-ray (EDX) was used to examine the morphology of the biochar samples. Volatile matter in biochar was determined following the ASTM D 3175 -07 standard test method (ASTM, 2004). Water holding capacity (WHC) of biochars was measured regarding the following procedures of soil analysis manual (Lee, 2007). Electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids and pH were measured using a SUNTEX SC-110 portable conductivity-meter. 92
  • 93. Two different crops were evaluated, (glutinous corn and Chinese cabbage) addition of biochar at 100% (pure biochar without soil – test 1) and 50% biochar (50-50 soil-biochar relation – test 2) were evaluated. Seedbeds where prepared in order to test the four different temperatures of bamboo biochars. Each treatment had 16 pots. Seeds were sown in 500 mL soil in a plastic container (16 cm × 10 .5 cm × 5 cm), the data of germination rate, started to be quantified on the 3rd day followed by measures on the 5th and 7th day of the trial. For corn a single seed was placed into the germination pots unlike cabbage, where 2-3 seeds where placed, due to their difference in sizes. Stem size, leaf number, leaf width and leaf length of each one of the emerged plants for corn and cabbage was measured. Statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SAS (v.9.2) 93
  • 94. ICP of Biochars Elements mg/L Raw Bamboo 240 °C 300 °C 600 °C 700 °C Fe 4.2 18.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 Zn 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.0 0.9 Na 6.4 6.0 5.7 5.6 12.7 K 59.9 62.6 82.0 103.0 131.0 Ca 8.6 8.5 7.9 13.0 12.3 Mn 0.4 0.5 1.7 2.6 2.7 Mg 19.9 7.1 13.1 22.2 18.8 Cu 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 WHC % 78.0 85.0 97.0 150.0 200.0 VM % 3.7 3.0 2.8 1.0 1.0 94 The contents determined by ICP showed that as pyrolysis temperature increased the presence of elements in their majority also increased (Na, K, Ca, Mn, Mg). Raw bamboo has a percentage water holding capacity of 78.0% that is enhanced by carbonization process, resulting in 200% water retention. In our study, water holding capacity (WHC) increased to a maximum value as pyrolyzation temperature increased.
  • 95. 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 (a) (c) (b) (d) (e) Amine CO2 -CH3 Aromatic C-O -CH C=O 2- -OH 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Intencity (%) Wave number(cm-1) 95 FTIR Spectra of tested samples, each letter (a,b,c,d,e) represents raw bamboo biomass and different pyrolysis temperature: (a) 240oC, (b) 300oC, (c) 600oC, and (d) 700oC. In this analysis of biochar, the FTIR was used specifically to determine the functional groups present for each temperature and biomass, especially carbons and aromatics. Various bonds in the spectra (at 3412.49 ~ 3469.91 cm−1) corresponds to -OH stretching vibrations and this may be caused by acid and/or alcohol structures. The results of FT-IR and elemental analysis shows regardless of the similarity in temperatures in some biochars, the intensity and the concentration of the surface functional groups would vary. All of the samples also have a C≡N bonding in the same position of the CO2 peak (2347.92 cm−1), this is expected due to the possible presence of nitrogen in the biochar. The importance of these differences from a soil fertility point of view is that surface area and porosity of the biochar plays a significant role in soil fertility. In contrast to the optimum conditions for the formation of the acid functional groups, more intense charring conditions (higher temperatures and longer charring times) are required for the formation of porosity and surface area in the biochar (Rutherford et al., 2004).
  • 96. 96 a - Raw bamboo b - Bamboo 240 0C c - Bamboo 300 0C d - Bamboo 600 0C e - Bamboo 700 0C Cellulose Intensity (a. u.) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Graphite crystal 101 100 002 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2 Theta (degree) X‐ ray diffraction patterns of biochar samples; each letter (a, b, c, d, and e) represents raw bamboo biomass and different pyrolysis temperature: (a) 240oC, (b) 300oC, (c) 600oC, and (d) 700oC.
  • 97. 97 SEM–EDX analysis of biochar (a, b, c, d). The formation of particle size is showed for the four temperatures applied to obtain biochar. Is observed how porosity is developed, higher temperatures – the porosity number increases and the size of the pores narrows down, giving as a result better water holding capacity. The formation of particle size is showed for the four temperatures applied to obtain biochar. Is observed how porosity is developed, higher temperatures – the porosity number increases and the size of the pores narrows down, giving as a result better water holding capacity. If the development of pores in biochar samples is enhanced with increasing temperature (especially at 600 and 800oC), it may result in significant improvement in the pore properties of biochars (Mohammad et al., 2013).
  • 98. 98 a a a a a a 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 b a b ab a ab b a 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Seed germination mean (%) Biochar treatments Pyrolysis temperatures 1) 240 0C 2) 300 0C 3) 600 0C 4) 700 0C Corn 50% Cabbage 50% Corn 100% Cabbage 100% (a) Effects of different temperatures and rates of bamboo biochar applied for corn and cabbage. (a) Seed germination percentage, (b) stem size (cm), and (c) leaf number were tested at rates of 50 and 100%. Error bars show standard errors of the mean. Mean data followed by a similar letter are not statistically significant within each biochar temperature. 100% - 600oC 100% - 700oC 50%-700oC
  • 99. 99
  • 100. 100
  • 101. 101

Editor's Notes

  1. Animated vertical list merging with pictures (Intermediate) To reproduce the SmartArt effects on this slide, do the following: On the Home tab, in the Slides group, click Layout, and then click Blank. On the Insert tab, in the Illustrations group, click SmartArt. In the Choose a SmartArt Graphic dialog box, in the left pane, click List. In the List pane, double-click Vertical Picture List (fifth row, first option from the left) to insert the graphic into the slide. To create a fourth shape in the graphic, select the third shape from the top, and then under SmartArt Tools, on the Design tab, in the Create Graphic group, click the arrow next to Add Shape, and then click Add Shape Before. Repeat this process to create a fifth shape. Select the graphic. Under SmartArt Tools, on the Format tab, click Size, and then do the following: In the Height box, enter 6.38”. In the Width box, enter 7.91”. Under SmartArt Tools, on the Format tab, in the Arrange group, click Align, and then do the following: Click Align to Slide. Click Align Middle. Click Align Center. Select the graphic, and then click one of the arrows on the left border. In the Type your text here dialog box, click each of the second-level bullets and then press DELETE until there are only three first-level bullets remaining (one for each shape). Enter text for each shape into the first-level bullets. On the slide, select the graphic. On the Home tab, in the Font group, select 14 from the Font Size list. Under SmartArt Tools, on the Design tab, in the SmartArt Styles group, click More, and then under Best Match for Document click Moderate Effect (fourth option from the left). On the Design tab (the regular Design tab, not that under the SmartArt Tools contextual tab), in the Themes group, click Colors, and then click Civic. (Note: If this action is taken in a PowerPoint presentation containing more than one slide, the theme colors will be applied to all of the slides.) Under SmartArt Tools, on the Design tab, in the SmartArt Styles group, click Change Colors, and then under Colorful click Colorful Range – Accent Colors 3 to 4 (third option from the left). Click each of the five picture placeholders in the graphic, and then in the Insert Picture dialog box, select a picture and click Insert. Press and hold CTRL, and then select all five of the pictures on the slide. Under SmartArt Tools, on the Format tab, in the Shapes group, click Change Shape, and then under Rectangles click Round Diagonal Corner Rectangle (ninth option from the left). Under SmartArt Tools, on the Format tab, in the Shape Styles group, click Shape Effects, point to Glow, and then do the following: Under Glow Variations, select 5 pt glow, Accent color 1, (first row, first option from the left). Point to More Glow Colors, and then under Theme Colors click White, Background 1 (first row, first option from the left). Press and hold CTRL, and then select all of the larger rounded rectangles. Under SmartArt Tools, on the Format tab, in the Shapes group, click Change Shape, and then under Rectangles click Round Diagonal Corner Rectangle (ninth option from the left). To reproduce the animation effects on this slide, do the following: On the Animations tab, in the Advanced Animations group, click Animation Pane. On the slide, select the graphic. On the Animations tab, in the Animation group, click the More arrow at the Effects Gallery, and under Entrance, click Fade. In the Timing group, in the Duration list, enter 01.00. In the Advanced Animations group, click Add Animation, and under Motion Paths, click Lines, then do the following: In the Animation group, click Effect Options and then click Right. In the Timing group, in the Start list, select With Previous. Also in the Timing group, in the Duration list, select 01.00. On the slide, right-click the right motion path and then click Reverse Path Direction. Press and hold CTRL, and then select the two animation effects in the Animation Pane. In the Animation group, click Effect Options and under Sequence, select One by One. Also in the Animation Pane, click the double arrows under each effect to expand the list of effects. Select the first animation effect (fade effect for the first rectangle). On the Animations tab, in the Timing group, in the Start list, select With Previous. Also in the Animation Pane, select the 11th animation effect (motion path for the first picture). On the slide, point to the starting point (green arrow) of the selected motion path until the cursor becomes a two-headed arrow. Press and hold SHIFT to constrain the path to a straight horizontal line, and then drag the starting point to the left of the endpoint (red arrow). Also in the Animation Pane, do the following: Drag the 11th effect until it is second in the list of effects. Drag the 12th effect (motion path for the first large rectangle) until it is fourth in the list of effects. Also in the Animation Pane, select the 13th animation effect (motion path for the second picture). On the slide, point to the starting point (green arrow) of the selected motion path until the cursor becomes a two-headed arrow. Press and hold SHIFT, and then drag the starting point to the left of the endpoint (red arrow), into the same position as the green arrow for the first picture motion path. Also in the Animation Pane, do the following: Drag the 13th animation effect until it is sixth in the list of effects. On the Animations tab, in the Timing group, in the Start list, select With Previous. Drag the 14th animation effect (motion path for the second large rectangle) until it is eighth in the list of effects. In the Animation Pane, select the 15th animation effect (motion path for the third picture). On the slide, point to the starting point (green arrow) of the selected motion path until the cursor becomes a two-headed arrow. Press and hold SHIFT, and then drag the starting point to the left of the endpoint (red arrow), into the same position as the starting point for the first picture motion path. Also in the Animation Pane, do the following: Drag the 15th animation effect until it is 10th in the list of effects. On the Animations tab, in the Timing group, in the Start list, select With Previous. Drag the 16th animation effect (motion path for the third large rectangle) until it is 12th in the list of effects. Select the 17th animation effect (motion path for the fourth picture). On the slide, point to the starting point (green arrow) of the selected motion path until the cursor becomes a two-headed arrow. Press and hold SHIFT, and then drag the starting point to the left of the endpoint (red arrow), into the same position as the starting point for the first picture motion path. Also in the Animation Pane, do the following: Drag the 17th animation effect until it is 14th in the list of effects. On the Animations tab, in the Timing group, in the Start list, select With Previous. Drag the 18th animation effect (motion path for the fourth large rectangle) until it is 16th in the list of effects. Select the 19th animation effect (motion path for the fifth picture). On the slide, point to the starting point (green arrow) of the selected motion path until the cursor becomes a two-headed arrow. Press and hold SHIFT, and then drag the starting point to the left of the endpoint (red arrow), into the same position as the starting point for the first picture motion path. Also in the Animation Pane, drag the 19th animation effect until it is 18th in the list of effects. On the Animations tab, in the Timing group, in the Start list, select With Previous. To reproduce the background effects on this slide, do the following: Right-click the slide background area, and then click Format Background. In the Format Background dialog box, click Fill in the left pane, select Gradient fill in the Fill pane, and then do the following: In the Type list, select Radial. Click the button next to Direction, and then click From Top Left Corner (fifth option from the left) in the drop-down list. Under Gradient stops, click Add gradient stop or Remove gradient stop until two stops appear on the slider, then customize the gradient stops as follows: Select the first stop on the slider, and then do the following: In the Position box, enter 0%. Click the button next to Color, and then under Theme Colors click White, Background 1 (first row, first option from the left). Select the last stop on the slider, and then do the following: In the Position box, enter 100%. Click the button next to Color, and then under Theme Colors click White, Background 1, Darker 25% (fourth row, first option from the left).
  2. The existing literature (Haefele et al., 2011; Rawat et al., 2010) has also illustrated that the soil OM increases the WHC of sandy loam while increasing aeration in silt and clay loam. It also indicates the releasing of OC and NPK to soil OM through decomposition reaction. we can conclude that the decomposition of OC in biochar to soil OM resulting in the increase in WHC and the decreasing in silt is the mechanism of WB and RHB application in this study.