SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  13
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Analyzing Workplace Communication
                          Dr. Trent Keough


             I: Communication as a Medium for Authority

      In a non-reciprocal communication paradigm data is 'pipelined' through an
organization. Data gets picked-up as needed. Here information is considered to be
a commodity much like gasoline or potato chips. People partake of communication
when they need it, want it, or got to have it! Service driven intranets, newspapers,
inaugural speeches, leadership blogs, and company newsletters can function in this
way. Information is driven one way with little expectation that real-time
engagement will occur.

        Communication as strategy for data delivery can work to incite pleasure,
anger, or have neutral emotional impact. It can celebrate a good news story or
facilitate the access of services directly to an employee/customer. Introducing
negative information via a data pipeline fails to draw on the layering of positional
authority that buffers and refines information to specified audiences. A classic
example of this failure is the utilization of a press release as the singular
communication on an abrupt change or response to crisis. Engagement
anticipation/expectation is a marker of truly effective communication. Effective
communication expects its cycle silences to be filled with polyphony offering
questions or commentary.

      Engagement anticipation can be created. Creating opportunities for
dissonance can be effected by acting on the intention to literally watch and
observe. The premise of needing a communication observation is not made on the
expectation for inciting anger, but a recognition of the unintended consequences of
every expressed intention. This need to observe can be addressed by the creation of
communication ambassadors who literally observe communications and reflect and
reframe messages at specified junctures. The individuals acting as communication
ambassadors demonstrate keen listening skills and knowledge of what kind or
purposing the communication is given. For example, individuals inexperienced
with a „first dialogue and then decide‟ decision-making style will take the

                                                                                       1
preliminary discussion for the actual decision unless periodically checked. It is
wise to assume that some will hear what they desire, not what was said, written, or
presented.

       Recognition of „voicing‟ opportunities can provide the experience necessary
for developing group syncretism. The anticipated singularity is not so dissimilar to
the codifying „group-think‟ emerging from „storming, forming and norming‟
activities. There is a level of disengagement required to undertake this activity. The
intended outcome needs to be foregrounded and become a self-conscious part of
the process. It‟s only a matter of pausing to say, „We are undertaking this activity
to achieve x outcome.‟ When disengagement activities are not built into
communication strategies escalation into emotive exchange/response often occurs.
Successful negotiators and mediators are clearly utilizing disengagement strategies
when they identify opportunities for moving dissenting parties to common ground.

       Most organizations have some measure of structural disengagement built
into them. Disengagement can also come in the form of „scope of practice‟
delineations. If reduced to its most rudimentary of forms disengagement is either
self-willed or superimposed by structural hierarchy. Let's consider a publically
funded, unionized college as an example. Management, faculty, excluded and staff
rights are segregated by differences in their employment contracts, position
profiles, collective agreements, and by legislation. So, too, are their
communication profiles. The broadest category of separation is typically found in
the distinction between employer/ employee rights and privileges. The rights to
interpret, challenge and apply collective agreements are known by all signatories.
Some access to information can be subjected to negotiations after contractual
bindings are in place. What does a unionized environment impart about the
language of a profession or workplace?

       Within any organization communications culture is influenced by structure.
As a language is both the vehicle and means to definition of cultural
consciousness, communications culture is both the medium and the effect of
organizational structure. The organization‟s reporting and decision-making
structure defines the social infrastructure housing communications. The charter for
internal communications begins with the organizational chart. If that structure is


                                                                                    2
hierarchical, then there is almost certainty of control-based decision-making and
delegation of limited authorities.

       Through delegation each member of the organization, according to
individual rights and privileges defined by occupational scope of practice, makes
decisions in the workplace. In turn each has responsibility for communicating
about these decisions. These decisions are also influenced by policies, procedures,
guidelines. Who makes which decisions is normally clarified further in reporting
lines of accountability. Hierarchical organization structures have clearly articulated
communication zones and parameters for disclosure. These are also physical
disengagement zones based on segregation of duties.

       Positions are intended to accurately and efficiently move information within
organizations. It is anticipated that individuals in these positions are capable of
mediating for emotional and cultural contexts. This assumption is too often
erroneous as most people are unaware of language as semantic and cultural
politics. Again and again we see evidence of the wrong people delivering crucial
messages to the wrong audiences. The person occupying a position may not have
the communication skills required to deliver the message or the mental aptitude or
stomach, depending on content. The person who delivers the message is as
important as knowledge of the content and the audience. Don‟t send a salesman to
inform a group of a sudden death. High energy extroverts can be perceived as
being inauthentic or unsympathetic if unconnected to the tragedy.

       The relationship between the medium (form: video, print, audio) and the
message (the content‟s what) is complicated further by authorial intention (e.g. say
the management's expressed or desired results), 'reader' responsiveness (e.g. the
employees‟ identification of implicit messages in anticipated results) and the
predictive dialogism of collective reception (e.g. cultures of suspicion, trust,
negotiation, mediation, protest, acceptance). As little as 10% of „verbal‟
communication is unaffected by physical context, i.e. body language, timing of
message, place of delivery, immediate audience response, etc., and predicative
reception. It is not surprising that simultaneous and scripted communications do
not elicit identical responses or identical levels of factual awareness within or
across groupings. The element of dissonance in predictive reception is
compounded when organizations are stratified by geography and departments.

                                                                                     3
Allegations of inadequate communication can reflect deficits and biases in
reception not inadequate volume or accuracy of communication. When a message
isn‟t liked, or is unwanted, the lack of communication banner often gets waived. In
such instances repeating the message with more volume does not eliminate
another‟s imagined hearing deficit or bridge semantic/ linguistic differences. The
relationship between volume, frequency and linguistic effectiveness invariably
brings us back to medium/message and intention/reception analysis.

       In everyday circumstance this complexity is reduced to issues of mistrust
based on dissatisfaction with previous decisions and actions. Most people are ill-
equipped to engage in examination of communication as cognitive process, social
science, and semiotic theory. Least of all very few would welcome the suggestion
that allegation of communication failure is often nothing more than expression of
unhappiness with clearly articulated decisions changing work. Ownership of
communication invariably requires acknowledgement of personal or group deficit
in some areas of the loop.

       Unhappy people consistently don't like much of what they see or hear within
or outside of work. We generally accept that there are skeptics, cynics, optimists,
and those in search of serendipity or „Serenity NOW!‟ Yet, there is reluctance to
use these labels for individuals and workplace groups. Why? We know that some
people seek the attention lacking in their personal lives at work. They bring that
need and the many frustrations of their lives to the desks and lunchrooms of co-
workers. The lonely accuser doesn't live exclusively at bus stations. How many
jaded people work with you? Why do people lose trust? What causes it?
Answering these questions is likely as difficult as explaining the phenomenon of
divorce. Loss of trust originates with acts disassociation, decreasing emotional
commitment and connection, suspicion of secrets, acts of bad faith, and increasing
silences between positive communications, etc.

       When trust is broken it is easy to become cynical or jaded. How can an
employee trust when the employer openly withholds or limits or sanitizes or spins
information? Information access and data pipelines are not equally open to all
employees. There can be a disconnection between employees' desire to know, their
collective need to know, and the information gatekeeper's willingness for
disclosure. There is no exception to the fact that people are curious of all things

                                                                                     4
and can have equally curious opinions on all things. Is it imperative to make full
disclosure in order to build organizational trust? Some would think so. The erosion
of privacy and the willful disclosure of personal information witnessed in social
media and television also impacts the workplace.

       There is also no denial of the power that knowledge management affords to
those in control of it. Every workplace presents these facts. Employees normally
want to know what's going on even if the matter has little to with their individual
terms of employment. In contradiction, employment terms can delineate specified
roles for communicators. Some, however, do not feel constrained by a need to
know paradigm. We can attribute this need to comment on all things, particularly
on areas outside of professional experience or employment responsibility, to false
pluralism, a growing lack of privacy within and outside of the workplace, the
presumption of another‟s interest in my contrary opinion, or perhaps inadequate
workload.

       Within any organization structure we can sometimes find ourselves
distanced from decision-making. The popular television series “Undercover Boss”
often reveals management‟s failure to listen to employee insights. Once the boss
bridges the physical gap and listens to employees things change for the employee‟s
good. Correspondingly the boss can be (not always) presented as a caring employer
kept ignorant by middle management. The series popularizes the failure to
communicate into urban legend and universal truth. Such entertainment celebrates
underdog employees being rewarded for devotion, diligence and competence.
Belief that good work gets unrecognized and goes unrewarded is a manifestation of
a sense of hopeless in the contemporary workplace. There is a deep yearning for
honesty, respect and authentic engagement in the workplace. Effective
communication creates moments or opportunities for connection on emotional and
personal levels of knowing the boss, the company, and the team. The cause for this
emotional need could be linked to disintegration of the traditional nuclear family,
limited opportunity for socialization outside of work, and lack of off-line, real-time
face-to-face networking.

      Creating opportunities for making authentic personal connections in the
workplace isn‟t easy, possible or always likely. Distance from decision-making can
occur due to our differences in scopes of practice or physical locations. The

                                                                                      5
executive rarely considers the receiving room employee's opinion on a corporate
merger or buy out. Unless, of course, the merger is between receiving rooms or the
employee is a major shareholder or one engaged in corporate espionage! We can
also find ourselves removed from decision-making by a lack of understanding. The
logic informing the decision might include facts or interpretation thereof that is
outside our knowledge base, experiential familiarity or functional specialization.
Accountants' interpretations of financial statements can befuddle others. Changes
in one section of an organization can be distorted/magnified in effect and
perception within another section. Knowing when we are getting out of scope is
sometimes impossible, especially when we‟ve been taught to use our voices.

       Cognitive, political, social, physical and professional 'distance' from
decision-making increases the probability of both misinterpretation of actions and
dissatisfaction with outcomes. We can move to conclusions and become
emotionally invested by assumptions and biases within our own limiting
perspectives of what is occurring. Our individual interpretations of others'
decisions can be informed by our own expectations for entitlements, desire to
maintain status quo, or perceived conflict with a figured future state. Too often our
own coloring isn't as visible to us as to others. We can be driven to acknowledge
uncomfortable truths about ourselves when scrutinizing another's perceived lack of
communication--if we engage with honesty and positive intention.

       Clearly there is room for self-deception, intentional misinterpretation, gossip
and fear mongering. We are not always honest in our self-assessments, let alone
accurate in our evaluations of others' intentions and motives. Shouts of
communication failure are not always factual indications to a lack of
communication or ineffective communication. Effective communication does not
uniformly bring forth positive responses in its targeted audiences. Circumstance,
what is being communicated, and culture are three factors influencing emotional
affect. Not all interpretations of fact are proffered with innocence or embellished
with hope for a better tomorrow. Character slander is an acceptable response tactic
in some cultures: „I don‟t like your opinion; therefore, you are an immoral person.”
Equally, attitudes to lying and unethical behavior can be legitimized by efforts to
achieve hidden agendas.



                                                                                     6
Opinion without restraint is one of the major sources of conflict in the
workplace. We have encouraged and valorized the right to express opinion as part
of our self-esteem culture. There is only tenuous connection between one‟s degree
of self-esteem and another‟s prediction of our expertise or professional authority.
To indicate that others‟ opinion do not matter or is irrelevant or trivial is
considered tantamount to an attack upon their individual identities. Equality of
opinion is a self-serving myth. We live in an era that can assert the need for
equality in decision-making over the authority of workplace common sense. This
phenomenon can be linked to the sociological decline in respect for and trust in
authority. In contemporary society authority is to be suspected. We herald
transparency as an antidote to this fear. In a state of transparency all matters are
open to opinion and interpretation. When authority is rejected, every extraneous
opinion is to be elevated for formal consideration. The ridiculous extreme of this
phenomenon is referendum voting on singular issues driven by minority interests.
Once a referendum is in process what drives the majority to vote?

       A desire to influence the decision-making governed by the authority of
another is part of the democratic process identifying our nation. The transfer of
republican principles to management as opposed to governance of our
organizations is neither desirable nor feasible. We have clearly segregated rights
and no assumption of equality. Why then is it feasible to expect wholesale
consultation? Management, faculty, excluded, and staff are not treated equally in
pay, privileges, or decision-making capacities. Within each of the individual
groups there are differentiated rights and unique expectations. We can present
dissatisfaction with the lack of equality but there are no non-legal means to change
these differences. They are systemic differences inherent to organizational culture.
The desire for equality of pay and benefits is most acute when others' decisions
impact us by changing benefits, hours of work, traditional working patterns,
elimination of services or reductions. When responding to others' decisions
impacting us we can present behavior where we claim to have better insight and
know-how than those persons with the authority to decide.

       The tension between owned authority and the desire for the decision-making
power of another is the source of bad feelings and a sense of powerlessness in the
workplace. A desire to be in control of another's domain establishes the need for an
'otherness' comparable to the definition of an enemy. Perhaps this sense of
                                                                                   7
alienation and threat is a variation on the theme of the famous statement: "I have
seen the enemy, and it is us!" The enemy of workplace satisfaction is the envy of
power seated in the desire to be in control within the workplace. The myth of
seeding power within hierarchical structures flows from the same source as the
faux egalitarianism propagated in social media. So much of our lives is directed by
external and extraneous forces that we seek to bring order by force of will. Faced
with the merciless shifts of resource-based economics, unable to cope with the
increasing erosion of privacy, we stake our ground zero in one of the most artificial
geographies of self-definition: the workplace.

       Authentic workplace engagement recognizes power imbalances and the
desire for engagement on intellectual, spiritual, and/or emotional levels.
Communication of the possibility for this workplace connectivity must recognize a
shifting of the separation of place of work from personal living space. Workplaces
are increasingly more like places of leisure where people make friends and earn a
living while building relationships. Traditional work structures and current
expectations for engagement can be at odds and cause structural barriers for
effective communication.




                                                                                   8
II: 11 Steps to Improving Workplace Communications*


1. Identify changes that have occurred to leadership, decision-making, and
   desire fulfillment opportunities.

Some of these destabilizing influences are local and others are global. For
example we can trace organizational instability to some of the following:

      Senior leadership once held long tenure and many staff have had
      many years of familiarity with decision-making and processes.
      Changes in leadership have been abrupt. There is confusion over how
      decisions get made.
      There is a budgetary reduction; increasing/declining student numbers
      directly impact staffing level; radical changes in programming
      clusters and delivery strategies; evolving changes to student
      demographics, etc.
      Globally there is a revolution taking place in the field of education.
      New funding and accountability protocols are being developed
      around graduation rates, not overall enrolments.
      Instructors no longer have complete autonomy in their classrooms,
      and students are demanding edutainment, etc.
      Overall, there is a high degree of uncertainty in the field of post-
      secondary education. We can describe sources of anxiety related to
      concerns with: funding, delivery models, ownership of curriculum,
      changing student demographics, effects of a super-heated economy,
      fear of loss of control, erosion of trust in public leadership, fear for
      and suspicion of what the future will bring, etc.


2. Name the resulting atmosphere of change.

Global and local destabilization within the field of postsecondary education
is creating an atmosphere of fear, anxiety and distrust in many
organizations..

Is there an inordinate degree of anxiety over future prospects? Why? What
are the levels of stress, worry, suspicion, distrust, or evidence of a lack of
confidence in strategic directions.
                                                                                 9
3. Define the attributes and techniques for achieving effective workplace
   communication. (The following suggestions are not presented in order of
   importance.)

         An effective communications policy clearly articulates decision-
         making authorities as well as expectations for consultation,
         information gathering and information sharing as appropriate to
         circumstance.


         Effective communication practices will honor decision-making
         authorities as defined by position descriptions and the college
         organizational chart.


         Effective communication means that all employees are aware of
         their own and others’ decision-making authorities and
         responsibilities.


         Effective communication presents a duty to consult and negotiate
         as appropriate to context.


         Effective communication recognizes others’ legitimate needs for
         information beyond the general ‘right/like to know’ in order for
         them to perform their individual duties.


         Effective communication enables cross-departmental working
         relationships, innovation and collaboration.


         Effective communication tells the story of ‘why we have changed’
         in relation to historical and contemporary business activities.


         Effective communication responds to the unique barriers to
         information sharing and information awareness within an
                                                                            10
organization and mediates according to individual and group
         needs.


         Effective communication demonstrates respect for the talents,
         abilities and contributions of all employees.


         Effective communication motivates employees to share in and
         celebrate institutional accomplishments.



4. Acquire knowledge of existing communications theory and practice, and
   answer this question: „How are theories of communication presently
   being applied in your organization?‟

   Define the organization’s communication practices, its baseline
   assumptions about communications, and formalize its expectations for
   communications in guidelines and policies. Define and agree upon what
   effective communication is meant to accomplish.


5. Recognize and understand the perspectives of others relative to the
   positions they hold in the organization. Occupation and job role can
   influence individual contributions to harmony in the workplace and
   resistance to change.

   Effective communication requires relationship building. What evidence is
   there of assessment of failed or failing relationships? What are the
   sources of institutional conflict and disagreement? Where is there
   evidence of ownership and responsibility?

   Avoid the name- to- blame game here as the intention is to identify
   positional authorities with competing or contradictory interests and to
   see opportunity for mediation and achieving concurrence. Here there’s
   opportunity to name some of the positional moose causing anxiety.




                                                                             11
6. Define existing communications culture in relation to knowledge
   acquired of communications effectiveness.

   The existing communication culture is weak and is being further
   weakened by lack of solidarity, anxiety, and confidence in the future.


7. Specify how the organization presents communication change readiness.
   What are the elements of this readiness?

   The participation rate of surveys on communication effectiveness can
   indicate a genuine willingness to identify the issues undermining effective
   communication.

8. Identify the specific systems, relationships, processes and people creating
   conflicts negatively impacting communications.

   A. Goals of the institution are misaligned with that of individual
      employees. Increase and improve opportunity for attaining personal
      satisfaction in the workplace.
   B. Disrespect for institutional history, institutional legacy.
   C. Disagreement with the shift of focus from the college being a
      Teaching centered institution to becoming a Learning centered
      institution.
   D. Instructional authority is being dissipated/eroded/diminished by
      relegating instructors to Subject Matter Experts in a design and
      delivery team where they are 1 of 5 decision-makers.
   E. Disfavor with utilization of distributed learning model.
   F. Historical labor/management relationship has been impacted by
      frequent and lengthy contract negotiations in recent years.
   G. Fear of Digital Immigrants in an organization given to wholesale use
      of new learning technologies.
   H. Dissatisfaction with decisions on program directions, service levels,
      workflow expectations, etc.
   I. Propensity for gossip and biased speculation on why decisions have
      been made, etc.


9. Specify behavior and system changes required to improve
   communications.
                                                                            12
Name the challenges and identify the existing deficits. Encourage individual
ownership of the need to improve communications and clearly articulate
institutional expectation for excellence in communication. Present a
strategic communication plan for college approval.

10.Clarify every employee‟s communication responsibilities relative to
   achieving organizational success.

Write communications expectations and contributions into job descriptions,
goals and objectives, and include assessment in performance evaluations.

11.Provide opportunities for connection on the emotional and personal
   levels.

Grow empathy and mutual understanding to engender trust and respect.


I wish to acknowledge the contributions of my Portage College colleagues in
the development of the ideas and the articulation of these 11 steps. The
following are members of the Internal Communication Committee of
Portage College: Leslie Johnson, Connie Olstad, David Paul, Cathy
MacGillivray, Richard Cloutier, Patricia O‟Connor, Doreen Leitch, Felicity
Bergman, Fatema Taha, Carrie Froehler, and Janice Bryks.


Copyright Trent Keough 2013




                                                                          13

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Pro-Logos - Diagnosing Organizational Communication
Pro-Logos - Diagnosing Organizational CommunicationPro-Logos - Diagnosing Organizational Communication
Pro-Logos - Diagnosing Organizational CommunicationJames G. Bohn, Ph.D.
 
Po report 2
Po report 2Po report 2
Po report 2Syaff Hk
 
Po report 6 - A lot of bosses are accused of being poor communicator. what do...
Po report 6 - A lot of bosses are accused of being poor communicator. what do...Po report 6 - A lot of bosses are accused of being poor communicator. what do...
Po report 6 - A lot of bosses are accused of being poor communicator. what do...Syaff Hk
 
Communication in Business (Part 1)
Communication in Business (Part 1)Communication in Business (Part 1)
Communication in Business (Part 1)Deep Gurung
 
Dilemma of public relations consultancy nigeria
Dilemma of public relations consultancy nigeriaDilemma of public relations consultancy nigeria
Dilemma of public relations consultancy nigeriaThe Quadrant Company
 
Communication skills csa 1
Communication skills csa 1Communication skills csa 1
Communication skills csa 1Ultraspectra
 
Strengthening social ties via ict in the organization
Strengthening social ties via ict in the organizationStrengthening social ties via ict in the organization
Strengthening social ties via ict in the organizationOsku Torro
 
Barriers in effective communication
Barriers in effective communicationBarriers in effective communication
Barriers in effective communicationTamur Iqbal
 
Communication barriers 4
Communication barriers 4Communication barriers 4
Communication barriers 4kapakish
 
Barriers to communication
Barriers to communicationBarriers to communication
Barriers to communicationbhavytasindhav
 
Social communication essentials
Social communication essentialsSocial communication essentials
Social communication essentials022023
 
Effective International Business Communication
Effective International Business CommunicationEffective International Business Communication
Effective International Business CommunicationKaterina Kalantzi
 

Tendances (17)

Pro-Logos - Diagnosing Organizational Communication
Pro-Logos - Diagnosing Organizational CommunicationPro-Logos - Diagnosing Organizational Communication
Pro-Logos - Diagnosing Organizational Communication
 
Po report 2
Po report 2Po report 2
Po report 2
 
Po report 6 - A lot of bosses are accused of being poor communicator. what do...
Po report 6 - A lot of bosses are accused of being poor communicator. what do...Po report 6 - A lot of bosses are accused of being poor communicator. what do...
Po report 6 - A lot of bosses are accused of being poor communicator. what do...
 
To be influenced
To be influencedTo be influenced
To be influenced
 
Communication in Business (Part 1)
Communication in Business (Part 1)Communication in Business (Part 1)
Communication in Business (Part 1)
 
Dilemma of public relations consultancy nigeria
Dilemma of public relations consultancy nigeriaDilemma of public relations consultancy nigeria
Dilemma of public relations consultancy nigeria
 
Communication skills csa 1
Communication skills csa 1Communication skills csa 1
Communication skills csa 1
 
Communication ppt
Communication pptCommunication ppt
Communication ppt
 
BBIV- Final
BBIV- Final BBIV- Final
BBIV- Final
 
Communication class
Communication   classCommunication   class
Communication class
 
Strengthening social ties via ict in the organization
Strengthening social ties via ict in the organizationStrengthening social ties via ict in the organization
Strengthening social ties via ict in the organization
 
Barriers in effective communication
Barriers in effective communicationBarriers in effective communication
Barriers in effective communication
 
Communication barriers 4
Communication barriers 4Communication barriers 4
Communication barriers 4
 
Barriers to communication
Barriers to communicationBarriers to communication
Barriers to communication
 
Social communication essentials
Social communication essentialsSocial communication essentials
Social communication essentials
 
Cognitive Communication
Cognitive CommunicationCognitive Communication
Cognitive Communication
 
Effective International Business Communication
Effective International Business CommunicationEffective International Business Communication
Effective International Business Communication
 

En vedette

The world's strongest magnets by scientific american magazine
The world's strongest magnets by scientific american magazineThe world's strongest magnets by scientific american magazine
The world's strongest magnets by scientific american magazineDholon Paul
 
Alexis Corporate Presentation French
Alexis Corporate Presentation FrenchAlexis Corporate Presentation French
Alexis Corporate Presentation FrenchQMX Gold Corporation
 
Technology Proficiencies- 3-5
Technology Proficiencies- 3-5Technology Proficiencies- 3-5
Technology Proficiencies- 3-5dandewarren
 
5 Ongoing Projects in India
5 Ongoing Projects in India5 Ongoing Projects in India
5 Ongoing Projects in Indiaazeezbhai786
 
Introduction to Git
Introduction to GitIntroduction to Git
Introduction to GitAmit Mathur
 
nucor annual reports 2003
nucor annual reports 2003nucor annual reports 2003
nucor annual reports 2003finance16
 
Business and profits and its role in society
Business and profits and its role in societyBusiness and profits and its role in society
Business and profits and its role in societyVineet Murli
 
Today's Tech and CompTIA Certs
Today's Tech and CompTIA CertsToday's Tech and CompTIA Certs
Today's Tech and CompTIA CertsCompTIA
 
Technology Proficiencies- K-2
Technology Proficiencies- K-2Technology Proficiencies- K-2
Technology Proficiencies- K-2dandewarren
 
C74 ken-watanabe-reichen-lehmkuhl-michel-camilo-josh-rupe-annie-potts-adrian-...
C74 ken-watanabe-reichen-lehmkuhl-michel-camilo-josh-rupe-annie-potts-adrian-...C74 ken-watanabe-reichen-lehmkuhl-michel-camilo-josh-rupe-annie-potts-adrian-...
C74 ken-watanabe-reichen-lehmkuhl-michel-camilo-josh-rupe-annie-potts-adrian-...mike_asby_985
 
nyc-well-being-index-full-report
nyc-well-being-index-full-reportnyc-well-being-index-full-report
nyc-well-being-index-full-reportFernando Posadas
 
VCERA FAIR VALUE MEMI 20160718BusinessMeeting
VCERA FAIR VALUE MEMI 20160718BusinessMeetingVCERA FAIR VALUE MEMI 20160718BusinessMeeting
VCERA FAIR VALUE MEMI 20160718BusinessMeetingTavish Towner
 
Mental Health and Substance use within a child welfare-involved sample
Mental Health and Substance use within a child welfare-involved sampleMental Health and Substance use within a child welfare-involved sample
Mental Health and Substance use within a child welfare-involved sampleChristine Wekerle
 
Accounting in insurance companies basic concepts
Accounting in insurance companies   basic conceptsAccounting in insurance companies   basic concepts
Accounting in insurance companies basic conceptsAvik Saha
 

En vedette (19)

UJL 2015 1bis
UJL 2015 1bisUJL 2015 1bis
UJL 2015 1bis
 
The world's strongest magnets by scientific american magazine
The world's strongest magnets by scientific american magazineThe world's strongest magnets by scientific american magazine
The world's strongest magnets by scientific american magazine
 
9 c tics
9 c tics9 c tics
9 c tics
 
Alexis Corporate Presentation French
Alexis Corporate Presentation FrenchAlexis Corporate Presentation French
Alexis Corporate Presentation French
 
Learning and development
Learning and developmentLearning and development
Learning and development
 
Technology Proficiencies- 3-5
Technology Proficiencies- 3-5Technology Proficiencies- 3-5
Technology Proficiencies- 3-5
 
5 Ongoing Projects in India
5 Ongoing Projects in India5 Ongoing Projects in India
5 Ongoing Projects in India
 
Introduction to Git
Introduction to GitIntroduction to Git
Introduction to Git
 
nucor annual reports 2003
nucor annual reports 2003nucor annual reports 2003
nucor annual reports 2003
 
Business and profits and its role in society
Business and profits and its role in societyBusiness and profits and its role in society
Business and profits and its role in society
 
Today's Tech and CompTIA Certs
Today's Tech and CompTIA CertsToday's Tech and CompTIA Certs
Today's Tech and CompTIA Certs
 
Mobile payments: A history of [in]security
Mobile payments: A history of [in]securityMobile payments: A history of [in]security
Mobile payments: A history of [in]security
 
Technology Proficiencies- K-2
Technology Proficiencies- K-2Technology Proficiencies- K-2
Technology Proficiencies- K-2
 
C74 ken-watanabe-reichen-lehmkuhl-michel-camilo-josh-rupe-annie-potts-adrian-...
C74 ken-watanabe-reichen-lehmkuhl-michel-camilo-josh-rupe-annie-potts-adrian-...C74 ken-watanabe-reichen-lehmkuhl-michel-camilo-josh-rupe-annie-potts-adrian-...
C74 ken-watanabe-reichen-lehmkuhl-michel-camilo-josh-rupe-annie-potts-adrian-...
 
nyc-well-being-index-full-report
nyc-well-being-index-full-reportnyc-well-being-index-full-report
nyc-well-being-index-full-report
 
VCERA FAIR VALUE MEMI 20160718BusinessMeeting
VCERA FAIR VALUE MEMI 20160718BusinessMeetingVCERA FAIR VALUE MEMI 20160718BusinessMeeting
VCERA FAIR VALUE MEMI 20160718BusinessMeeting
 
Citibank
CitibankCitibank
Citibank
 
Mental Health and Substance use within a child welfare-involved sample
Mental Health and Substance use within a child welfare-involved sampleMental Health and Substance use within a child welfare-involved sample
Mental Health and Substance use within a child welfare-involved sample
 
Accounting in insurance companies basic concepts
Accounting in insurance companies   basic conceptsAccounting in insurance companies   basic concepts
Accounting in insurance companies basic concepts
 

Similaire à Analyzingworkplacecommunicationstk

Opencomm
OpencommOpencomm
Opencommshakema
 
Communication defination and types
Communication defination and typesCommunication defination and types
Communication defination and typeszulfiqaralibehan
 
Management - Communication
Management - CommunicationManagement - Communication
Management - Communicationdiddy98
 
Principles of supportive communication
Principles of supportive communicationPrinciples of supportive communication
Principles of supportive communicationJyotiDhanda3
 
Relationship%20 Breakdown
Relationship%20 BreakdownRelationship%20 Breakdown
Relationship%20 Breakdownprimary
 
Managing communications by redd f bancien (dr. borge)
Managing communications by redd f bancien (dr. borge)Managing communications by redd f bancien (dr. borge)
Managing communications by redd f bancien (dr. borge)Der Na Fuente Bella
 
bus.communication.pdf
bus.communication.pdfbus.communication.pdf
bus.communication.pdfssusered9eaf
 
Ipr & com con
Ipr & com  conIpr & com  con
Ipr & com conrakesh m
 
Business communication as a course
Business communication as a courseBusiness communication as a course
Business communication as a courseJames Brown Tsyokplo
 
Assignment business comm
Assignment business commAssignment business comm
Assignment business commvishal laddha
 
·Final ProjectNow its your turn! Below is all the information.docx
·Final ProjectNow its your turn! Below is all the information.docx·Final ProjectNow its your turn! Below is all the information.docx
·Final ProjectNow its your turn! Below is all the information.docxtawnyataylor528
 
The Probability Of Having Effective Cultural Interaction
The Probability Of Having Effective Cultural InteractionThe Probability Of Having Effective Cultural Interaction
The Probability Of Having Effective Cultural InteractionJamie Akers
 
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assignSilvaGraf83
 
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assignSilvaGraf83
 
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assignMoseStaton39
 
Chapter 11 Summary
Chapter 11 SummaryChapter 11 Summary
Chapter 11 Summaryajithsrc
 
Comm barrier
Comm barrierComm barrier
Comm barrierRadhe81
 

Similaire à Analyzingworkplacecommunicationstk (20)

Opencomm
OpencommOpencomm
Opencomm
 
Communication defination and types
Communication defination and typesCommunication defination and types
Communication defination and types
 
Management - Communication
Management - CommunicationManagement - Communication
Management - Communication
 
Principles of supportive communication
Principles of supportive communicationPrinciples of supportive communication
Principles of supportive communication
 
Relationship%20 Breakdown
Relationship%20 BreakdownRelationship%20 Breakdown
Relationship%20 Breakdown
 
The Causes Of Miscommunication
The Causes Of MiscommunicationThe Causes Of Miscommunication
The Causes Of Miscommunication
 
Managing communications by redd f bancien (dr. borge)
Managing communications by redd f bancien (dr. borge)Managing communications by redd f bancien (dr. borge)
Managing communications by redd f bancien (dr. borge)
 
bus.communication.pdf
bus.communication.pdfbus.communication.pdf
bus.communication.pdf
 
Ipr & com con
Ipr & com  conIpr & com  con
Ipr & com con
 
Business communication as a course
Business communication as a courseBusiness communication as a course
Business communication as a course
 
Assignment business comm
Assignment business commAssignment business comm
Assignment business comm
 
·Final ProjectNow its your turn! Below is all the information.docx
·Final ProjectNow its your turn! Below is all the information.docx·Final ProjectNow its your turn! Below is all the information.docx
·Final ProjectNow its your turn! Below is all the information.docx
 
The Probability Of Having Effective Cultural Interaction
The Probability Of Having Effective Cultural InteractionThe Probability Of Having Effective Cultural Interaction
The Probability Of Having Effective Cultural Interaction
 
C&n
C&nC&n
C&n
 
Competence In Communication Essay
Competence In Communication EssayCompetence In Communication Essay
Competence In Communication Essay
 
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
 
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
 
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
$6.00 Discussion· Bythe due date assigned, respond to the assign
 
Chapter 11 Summary
Chapter 11 SummaryChapter 11 Summary
Chapter 11 Summary
 
Comm barrier
Comm barrierComm barrier
Comm barrier
 

Analyzingworkplacecommunicationstk

  • 1. Analyzing Workplace Communication Dr. Trent Keough I: Communication as a Medium for Authority In a non-reciprocal communication paradigm data is 'pipelined' through an organization. Data gets picked-up as needed. Here information is considered to be a commodity much like gasoline or potato chips. People partake of communication when they need it, want it, or got to have it! Service driven intranets, newspapers, inaugural speeches, leadership blogs, and company newsletters can function in this way. Information is driven one way with little expectation that real-time engagement will occur. Communication as strategy for data delivery can work to incite pleasure, anger, or have neutral emotional impact. It can celebrate a good news story or facilitate the access of services directly to an employee/customer. Introducing negative information via a data pipeline fails to draw on the layering of positional authority that buffers and refines information to specified audiences. A classic example of this failure is the utilization of a press release as the singular communication on an abrupt change or response to crisis. Engagement anticipation/expectation is a marker of truly effective communication. Effective communication expects its cycle silences to be filled with polyphony offering questions or commentary. Engagement anticipation can be created. Creating opportunities for dissonance can be effected by acting on the intention to literally watch and observe. The premise of needing a communication observation is not made on the expectation for inciting anger, but a recognition of the unintended consequences of every expressed intention. This need to observe can be addressed by the creation of communication ambassadors who literally observe communications and reflect and reframe messages at specified junctures. The individuals acting as communication ambassadors demonstrate keen listening skills and knowledge of what kind or purposing the communication is given. For example, individuals inexperienced with a „first dialogue and then decide‟ decision-making style will take the 1
  • 2. preliminary discussion for the actual decision unless periodically checked. It is wise to assume that some will hear what they desire, not what was said, written, or presented. Recognition of „voicing‟ opportunities can provide the experience necessary for developing group syncretism. The anticipated singularity is not so dissimilar to the codifying „group-think‟ emerging from „storming, forming and norming‟ activities. There is a level of disengagement required to undertake this activity. The intended outcome needs to be foregrounded and become a self-conscious part of the process. It‟s only a matter of pausing to say, „We are undertaking this activity to achieve x outcome.‟ When disengagement activities are not built into communication strategies escalation into emotive exchange/response often occurs. Successful negotiators and mediators are clearly utilizing disengagement strategies when they identify opportunities for moving dissenting parties to common ground. Most organizations have some measure of structural disengagement built into them. Disengagement can also come in the form of „scope of practice‟ delineations. If reduced to its most rudimentary of forms disengagement is either self-willed or superimposed by structural hierarchy. Let's consider a publically funded, unionized college as an example. Management, faculty, excluded and staff rights are segregated by differences in their employment contracts, position profiles, collective agreements, and by legislation. So, too, are their communication profiles. The broadest category of separation is typically found in the distinction between employer/ employee rights and privileges. The rights to interpret, challenge and apply collective agreements are known by all signatories. Some access to information can be subjected to negotiations after contractual bindings are in place. What does a unionized environment impart about the language of a profession or workplace? Within any organization communications culture is influenced by structure. As a language is both the vehicle and means to definition of cultural consciousness, communications culture is both the medium and the effect of organizational structure. The organization‟s reporting and decision-making structure defines the social infrastructure housing communications. The charter for internal communications begins with the organizational chart. If that structure is 2
  • 3. hierarchical, then there is almost certainty of control-based decision-making and delegation of limited authorities. Through delegation each member of the organization, according to individual rights and privileges defined by occupational scope of practice, makes decisions in the workplace. In turn each has responsibility for communicating about these decisions. These decisions are also influenced by policies, procedures, guidelines. Who makes which decisions is normally clarified further in reporting lines of accountability. Hierarchical organization structures have clearly articulated communication zones and parameters for disclosure. These are also physical disengagement zones based on segregation of duties. Positions are intended to accurately and efficiently move information within organizations. It is anticipated that individuals in these positions are capable of mediating for emotional and cultural contexts. This assumption is too often erroneous as most people are unaware of language as semantic and cultural politics. Again and again we see evidence of the wrong people delivering crucial messages to the wrong audiences. The person occupying a position may not have the communication skills required to deliver the message or the mental aptitude or stomach, depending on content. The person who delivers the message is as important as knowledge of the content and the audience. Don‟t send a salesman to inform a group of a sudden death. High energy extroverts can be perceived as being inauthentic or unsympathetic if unconnected to the tragedy. The relationship between the medium (form: video, print, audio) and the message (the content‟s what) is complicated further by authorial intention (e.g. say the management's expressed or desired results), 'reader' responsiveness (e.g. the employees‟ identification of implicit messages in anticipated results) and the predictive dialogism of collective reception (e.g. cultures of suspicion, trust, negotiation, mediation, protest, acceptance). As little as 10% of „verbal‟ communication is unaffected by physical context, i.e. body language, timing of message, place of delivery, immediate audience response, etc., and predicative reception. It is not surprising that simultaneous and scripted communications do not elicit identical responses or identical levels of factual awareness within or across groupings. The element of dissonance in predictive reception is compounded when organizations are stratified by geography and departments. 3
  • 4. Allegations of inadequate communication can reflect deficits and biases in reception not inadequate volume or accuracy of communication. When a message isn‟t liked, or is unwanted, the lack of communication banner often gets waived. In such instances repeating the message with more volume does not eliminate another‟s imagined hearing deficit or bridge semantic/ linguistic differences. The relationship between volume, frequency and linguistic effectiveness invariably brings us back to medium/message and intention/reception analysis. In everyday circumstance this complexity is reduced to issues of mistrust based on dissatisfaction with previous decisions and actions. Most people are ill- equipped to engage in examination of communication as cognitive process, social science, and semiotic theory. Least of all very few would welcome the suggestion that allegation of communication failure is often nothing more than expression of unhappiness with clearly articulated decisions changing work. Ownership of communication invariably requires acknowledgement of personal or group deficit in some areas of the loop. Unhappy people consistently don't like much of what they see or hear within or outside of work. We generally accept that there are skeptics, cynics, optimists, and those in search of serendipity or „Serenity NOW!‟ Yet, there is reluctance to use these labels for individuals and workplace groups. Why? We know that some people seek the attention lacking in their personal lives at work. They bring that need and the many frustrations of their lives to the desks and lunchrooms of co- workers. The lonely accuser doesn't live exclusively at bus stations. How many jaded people work with you? Why do people lose trust? What causes it? Answering these questions is likely as difficult as explaining the phenomenon of divorce. Loss of trust originates with acts disassociation, decreasing emotional commitment and connection, suspicion of secrets, acts of bad faith, and increasing silences between positive communications, etc. When trust is broken it is easy to become cynical or jaded. How can an employee trust when the employer openly withholds or limits or sanitizes or spins information? Information access and data pipelines are not equally open to all employees. There can be a disconnection between employees' desire to know, their collective need to know, and the information gatekeeper's willingness for disclosure. There is no exception to the fact that people are curious of all things 4
  • 5. and can have equally curious opinions on all things. Is it imperative to make full disclosure in order to build organizational trust? Some would think so. The erosion of privacy and the willful disclosure of personal information witnessed in social media and television also impacts the workplace. There is also no denial of the power that knowledge management affords to those in control of it. Every workplace presents these facts. Employees normally want to know what's going on even if the matter has little to with their individual terms of employment. In contradiction, employment terms can delineate specified roles for communicators. Some, however, do not feel constrained by a need to know paradigm. We can attribute this need to comment on all things, particularly on areas outside of professional experience or employment responsibility, to false pluralism, a growing lack of privacy within and outside of the workplace, the presumption of another‟s interest in my contrary opinion, or perhaps inadequate workload. Within any organization structure we can sometimes find ourselves distanced from decision-making. The popular television series “Undercover Boss” often reveals management‟s failure to listen to employee insights. Once the boss bridges the physical gap and listens to employees things change for the employee‟s good. Correspondingly the boss can be (not always) presented as a caring employer kept ignorant by middle management. The series popularizes the failure to communicate into urban legend and universal truth. Such entertainment celebrates underdog employees being rewarded for devotion, diligence and competence. Belief that good work gets unrecognized and goes unrewarded is a manifestation of a sense of hopeless in the contemporary workplace. There is a deep yearning for honesty, respect and authentic engagement in the workplace. Effective communication creates moments or opportunities for connection on emotional and personal levels of knowing the boss, the company, and the team. The cause for this emotional need could be linked to disintegration of the traditional nuclear family, limited opportunity for socialization outside of work, and lack of off-line, real-time face-to-face networking. Creating opportunities for making authentic personal connections in the workplace isn‟t easy, possible or always likely. Distance from decision-making can occur due to our differences in scopes of practice or physical locations. The 5
  • 6. executive rarely considers the receiving room employee's opinion on a corporate merger or buy out. Unless, of course, the merger is between receiving rooms or the employee is a major shareholder or one engaged in corporate espionage! We can also find ourselves removed from decision-making by a lack of understanding. The logic informing the decision might include facts or interpretation thereof that is outside our knowledge base, experiential familiarity or functional specialization. Accountants' interpretations of financial statements can befuddle others. Changes in one section of an organization can be distorted/magnified in effect and perception within another section. Knowing when we are getting out of scope is sometimes impossible, especially when we‟ve been taught to use our voices. Cognitive, political, social, physical and professional 'distance' from decision-making increases the probability of both misinterpretation of actions and dissatisfaction with outcomes. We can move to conclusions and become emotionally invested by assumptions and biases within our own limiting perspectives of what is occurring. Our individual interpretations of others' decisions can be informed by our own expectations for entitlements, desire to maintain status quo, or perceived conflict with a figured future state. Too often our own coloring isn't as visible to us as to others. We can be driven to acknowledge uncomfortable truths about ourselves when scrutinizing another's perceived lack of communication--if we engage with honesty and positive intention. Clearly there is room for self-deception, intentional misinterpretation, gossip and fear mongering. We are not always honest in our self-assessments, let alone accurate in our evaluations of others' intentions and motives. Shouts of communication failure are not always factual indications to a lack of communication or ineffective communication. Effective communication does not uniformly bring forth positive responses in its targeted audiences. Circumstance, what is being communicated, and culture are three factors influencing emotional affect. Not all interpretations of fact are proffered with innocence or embellished with hope for a better tomorrow. Character slander is an acceptable response tactic in some cultures: „I don‟t like your opinion; therefore, you are an immoral person.” Equally, attitudes to lying and unethical behavior can be legitimized by efforts to achieve hidden agendas. 6
  • 7. Opinion without restraint is one of the major sources of conflict in the workplace. We have encouraged and valorized the right to express opinion as part of our self-esteem culture. There is only tenuous connection between one‟s degree of self-esteem and another‟s prediction of our expertise or professional authority. To indicate that others‟ opinion do not matter or is irrelevant or trivial is considered tantamount to an attack upon their individual identities. Equality of opinion is a self-serving myth. We live in an era that can assert the need for equality in decision-making over the authority of workplace common sense. This phenomenon can be linked to the sociological decline in respect for and trust in authority. In contemporary society authority is to be suspected. We herald transparency as an antidote to this fear. In a state of transparency all matters are open to opinion and interpretation. When authority is rejected, every extraneous opinion is to be elevated for formal consideration. The ridiculous extreme of this phenomenon is referendum voting on singular issues driven by minority interests. Once a referendum is in process what drives the majority to vote? A desire to influence the decision-making governed by the authority of another is part of the democratic process identifying our nation. The transfer of republican principles to management as opposed to governance of our organizations is neither desirable nor feasible. We have clearly segregated rights and no assumption of equality. Why then is it feasible to expect wholesale consultation? Management, faculty, excluded, and staff are not treated equally in pay, privileges, or decision-making capacities. Within each of the individual groups there are differentiated rights and unique expectations. We can present dissatisfaction with the lack of equality but there are no non-legal means to change these differences. They are systemic differences inherent to organizational culture. The desire for equality of pay and benefits is most acute when others' decisions impact us by changing benefits, hours of work, traditional working patterns, elimination of services or reductions. When responding to others' decisions impacting us we can present behavior where we claim to have better insight and know-how than those persons with the authority to decide. The tension between owned authority and the desire for the decision-making power of another is the source of bad feelings and a sense of powerlessness in the workplace. A desire to be in control of another's domain establishes the need for an 'otherness' comparable to the definition of an enemy. Perhaps this sense of 7
  • 8. alienation and threat is a variation on the theme of the famous statement: "I have seen the enemy, and it is us!" The enemy of workplace satisfaction is the envy of power seated in the desire to be in control within the workplace. The myth of seeding power within hierarchical structures flows from the same source as the faux egalitarianism propagated in social media. So much of our lives is directed by external and extraneous forces that we seek to bring order by force of will. Faced with the merciless shifts of resource-based economics, unable to cope with the increasing erosion of privacy, we stake our ground zero in one of the most artificial geographies of self-definition: the workplace. Authentic workplace engagement recognizes power imbalances and the desire for engagement on intellectual, spiritual, and/or emotional levels. Communication of the possibility for this workplace connectivity must recognize a shifting of the separation of place of work from personal living space. Workplaces are increasingly more like places of leisure where people make friends and earn a living while building relationships. Traditional work structures and current expectations for engagement can be at odds and cause structural barriers for effective communication. 8
  • 9. II: 11 Steps to Improving Workplace Communications* 1. Identify changes that have occurred to leadership, decision-making, and desire fulfillment opportunities. Some of these destabilizing influences are local and others are global. For example we can trace organizational instability to some of the following: Senior leadership once held long tenure and many staff have had many years of familiarity with decision-making and processes. Changes in leadership have been abrupt. There is confusion over how decisions get made. There is a budgetary reduction; increasing/declining student numbers directly impact staffing level; radical changes in programming clusters and delivery strategies; evolving changes to student demographics, etc. Globally there is a revolution taking place in the field of education. New funding and accountability protocols are being developed around graduation rates, not overall enrolments. Instructors no longer have complete autonomy in their classrooms, and students are demanding edutainment, etc. Overall, there is a high degree of uncertainty in the field of post- secondary education. We can describe sources of anxiety related to concerns with: funding, delivery models, ownership of curriculum, changing student demographics, effects of a super-heated economy, fear of loss of control, erosion of trust in public leadership, fear for and suspicion of what the future will bring, etc. 2. Name the resulting atmosphere of change. Global and local destabilization within the field of postsecondary education is creating an atmosphere of fear, anxiety and distrust in many organizations.. Is there an inordinate degree of anxiety over future prospects? Why? What are the levels of stress, worry, suspicion, distrust, or evidence of a lack of confidence in strategic directions. 9
  • 10. 3. Define the attributes and techniques for achieving effective workplace communication. (The following suggestions are not presented in order of importance.) An effective communications policy clearly articulates decision- making authorities as well as expectations for consultation, information gathering and information sharing as appropriate to circumstance. Effective communication practices will honor decision-making authorities as defined by position descriptions and the college organizational chart. Effective communication means that all employees are aware of their own and others’ decision-making authorities and responsibilities. Effective communication presents a duty to consult and negotiate as appropriate to context. Effective communication recognizes others’ legitimate needs for information beyond the general ‘right/like to know’ in order for them to perform their individual duties. Effective communication enables cross-departmental working relationships, innovation and collaboration. Effective communication tells the story of ‘why we have changed’ in relation to historical and contemporary business activities. Effective communication responds to the unique barriers to information sharing and information awareness within an 10
  • 11. organization and mediates according to individual and group needs. Effective communication demonstrates respect for the talents, abilities and contributions of all employees. Effective communication motivates employees to share in and celebrate institutional accomplishments. 4. Acquire knowledge of existing communications theory and practice, and answer this question: „How are theories of communication presently being applied in your organization?‟ Define the organization’s communication practices, its baseline assumptions about communications, and formalize its expectations for communications in guidelines and policies. Define and agree upon what effective communication is meant to accomplish. 5. Recognize and understand the perspectives of others relative to the positions they hold in the organization. Occupation and job role can influence individual contributions to harmony in the workplace and resistance to change. Effective communication requires relationship building. What evidence is there of assessment of failed or failing relationships? What are the sources of institutional conflict and disagreement? Where is there evidence of ownership and responsibility? Avoid the name- to- blame game here as the intention is to identify positional authorities with competing or contradictory interests and to see opportunity for mediation and achieving concurrence. Here there’s opportunity to name some of the positional moose causing anxiety. 11
  • 12. 6. Define existing communications culture in relation to knowledge acquired of communications effectiveness. The existing communication culture is weak and is being further weakened by lack of solidarity, anxiety, and confidence in the future. 7. Specify how the organization presents communication change readiness. What are the elements of this readiness? The participation rate of surveys on communication effectiveness can indicate a genuine willingness to identify the issues undermining effective communication. 8. Identify the specific systems, relationships, processes and people creating conflicts negatively impacting communications. A. Goals of the institution are misaligned with that of individual employees. Increase and improve opportunity for attaining personal satisfaction in the workplace. B. Disrespect for institutional history, institutional legacy. C. Disagreement with the shift of focus from the college being a Teaching centered institution to becoming a Learning centered institution. D. Instructional authority is being dissipated/eroded/diminished by relegating instructors to Subject Matter Experts in a design and delivery team where they are 1 of 5 decision-makers. E. Disfavor with utilization of distributed learning model. F. Historical labor/management relationship has been impacted by frequent and lengthy contract negotiations in recent years. G. Fear of Digital Immigrants in an organization given to wholesale use of new learning technologies. H. Dissatisfaction with decisions on program directions, service levels, workflow expectations, etc. I. Propensity for gossip and biased speculation on why decisions have been made, etc. 9. Specify behavior and system changes required to improve communications. 12
  • 13. Name the challenges and identify the existing deficits. Encourage individual ownership of the need to improve communications and clearly articulate institutional expectation for excellence in communication. Present a strategic communication plan for college approval. 10.Clarify every employee‟s communication responsibilities relative to achieving organizational success. Write communications expectations and contributions into job descriptions, goals and objectives, and include assessment in performance evaluations. 11.Provide opportunities for connection on the emotional and personal levels. Grow empathy and mutual understanding to engender trust and respect. I wish to acknowledge the contributions of my Portage College colleagues in the development of the ideas and the articulation of these 11 steps. The following are members of the Internal Communication Committee of Portage College: Leslie Johnson, Connie Olstad, David Paul, Cathy MacGillivray, Richard Cloutier, Patricia O‟Connor, Doreen Leitch, Felicity Bergman, Fatema Taha, Carrie Froehler, and Janice Bryks. Copyright Trent Keough 2013 13