2. power, unless the power of individual channels is already available, at selected critical point along the optical paths.
Simple optical tap couplers and photodiodes are used to monitor the optical power, and an automatic control
software has been developed to regulate optical power within each node, by adjusting appropriately the settings of
in-line variable optical attenuators (VOA), and the optical amplifier gain. This metro-optimized WDM design and
control, along with currently available EDFA sub-systems with variable gain, and variable-loss mid-stage access,
have enabled 32x10Gb/s non-return-to-zero WDM transport to cost-effectively scale to > 500 km (with forward-
error-correction). Furthermore, the control layer is able to self adjust each node, enabling automatic “plug and play”
node setup during the installation phase. The same system design innovation enables automatic adjustment for
ageing effects, and/or traffic changes.
We build the WDM system using commercially available optical components, and sub-systems. We
employ 8 x 4-skip-1 channel bands in the standard (C-band) ITU 100 GHz grid to allow for the most efficient and
flexible 1/2/4 channel OADMs based on the established thin-film-filter technology. The cost-effectiveness of AWG
technology is used for the 32 channel (muxing/demuxing) at the hubs. In mesh WDM networks, ASE is suppressed
by the use of standard ASE-filtering, at least once (anti-lasing hub) per ring. We use cost-effective 2-pump variable
gain EDFA technology with 17dBm maximum total output power, and msec transient suppression (with constant
gain operation). When required, we introduce dispersion compensating fiber (DCF) with approximately 100 FOM,
cascaded in a mid-stage access of a 3-stage variable gain EDFA, with maximum gain of 28 dB, and typical noise
figure around 6dB at 20dB gain. We finally employ a 100 Mb/s optical-supervisory-channel (OSC) at 1510nm for
management and control of our WDM system intelligence.
3. Network Performance
Figure-1: 8 node, 409 km demo. (a) Spans (left), (b) BER performance (center), (c) Received spectrum at the hub.
174610 5238
5693487
30 41846
4552765
129 077174
4182563
53132122
15189 1201
P s / n mK m f i b e rA t t t o tS p a n
1.00E-13
1.00E-12
1.00E-11
1.00E-10
1.00E-09
1.00E-08
1.00E-07
1.00E-06
1.00E-05
1.00E-04
9 .00 11.00 13 .00 15 .00 17 .00 19 .00 2 1.00 2 3 .00
-9 .0
-12
-15
-18
-2 2
-2 4
B 2 B -2 2
-60
-5 5
-5 0
-4 5
-4 0
-3 5
-3 0
-2 5
-2 0
1 5 2 8 1 5 3 3 1 5 3 8 1 5 4 3 1 5 4 8 1 5 5 3 1 5 5 8
We have extensively analyzed the performance of our WDM system in an actual 409 km ring with one hub
(ful-demultiplexing), and 7 four-channel basic OADM nodes with the non-uniform spans as described in Figure 1a.
We used multiple configurations with 10 Gb/s channels employing standard (nominally zero-chirp) LiNbO3
transmitter with 2 dBm modulated output power, and APD receiver without FEC. Figure 1b shows the BER
performance (and the residual dispersion penalty compared to back-to-back) for our longest reach channel as a
function of OSNR (0.2 nm resolution bandwidth) for different received power levels. After 318 km of propagation,
from the hub to node 2 (spans 2-8), 10-12
BER is guaranteed with OSNR > 16 dB (at -18 dBm). We have been able
to maintain OSNR > 20 dB typically for all paths, and all configurations, by leveraging our intelligent optical power
control that corrects the accumulated ASE noise to correctly account for the true signal power, and successful post-
compensation of the EDFA gain tilt. Figure 1c shows one such experimental result of 21 different channels received
at the hub. The system performance further allows for a “healthy” optical path penalty margin, which would include
1 dB for residual dispersion and NLE, another 1 dB for channels crosstalk in a fully populated 32 channel system,
and filter concatenation penalty remained well below 1 dB in this 8 node ring. Our analysis, has further confirmed
sufficient OSNR margin under EDFA transient suppression.
To explore the limits of our WDM system, we have also demonstrated a 16 node, 3 hubs, multi-channel
OADM ring network, with more than 500 km of G.652 fiber (Figure 2). We show the spectra for two 10Gb/s
channels in the worse-case optical path with 120 dB loss. The initial (left) OSNR degrades by more that 12 dB (here
filter concatenation accounts for 1dB penalty), but it remains at the receiver (right) > 23 dB (0.1 nm bandwidth),
which is well above the required (non-FEC) levels. These results well exceed the previously published related
demonstrations [4]. They also establish a 32 x 10 Gb/s WDM system performance that –leveraging the > 6dB of
OSNR gains with FEC (even more with Enhanced FEC) – would achieve BER in networks scaling to 15x20dB
3. (>1000 km) when all nodes are fully de-multiplexed (hubs). Even more important than such long reach, the present
results establish the span (OADM placement), and operational flexibility required to enable “open” WDM metro
regional architectures.
Figure-2: Spectra for two 10G channels in the worse-case path (120 dB loss) in the 16 node MRAN (left).
90.1Km
2 2 .5 d B
3 2 .3 Km
8 d B 2 7 .3 Km
6 .5 d B 7 2 Km
18 d B
2 8 .5 Km
7 d B
4 d B
10.7 Km
2 .8 d B
10d B
5 d B
5 d B
10d B
10d B
3 d B
5 d B
5 d B
10d B
F O A D M
# 1
BO A D M
# 9
BO A D M
BO A D M
# 11
F O A D M
# 3
BO A D M
BO A D M
BO A D M
# 14 BO A D M
BO A D M
BO A D M
BO A D M
BO A D M
O L A
BO A D M
F O A D M
# 2
4. Flexibility Considerations
We believe that flexible, automated system design that further supports unforeseen traffic patterns is the most
critical aspect to the success of WDM MRANs. Most initial WDM systems were limited to optical pass-through at a
waveband level. While this reduces filter concatenation penalties, it severely restricts the flexibility of the solution,
especially if the traffic is distributed, since much of the bandwidth in a waveband may remain stranded if there is no
sufficient demand between the corresponding end-nodes. We believe this is too restrictive for MRANs, and designed
our system to allow for wavelength-level add/drop, passthrough, and ultimately full reconfigurability at each node.
More specifically, to provide full flexibility, our system could leverage 3 types of nodes: (a) Full (32-wavelength)
demux/muxes enable manual non-traffic affecting reconfiguration, and pass channels through at the hubs with
minimal power penalties. (b) Basic OADMs enable lower-cost nodes that still allow individual channels to be
dropped, and then re-inserted back into the add path, without affecting any other wavelengths, but with add/drop
scalability limited to 1/2/4. (c) Finally, a remotely reconfigurable OADM (ROADM) architecture based on
established AWG technology with additional integrated 1x2 switches, enables complete service flexibility at cost
points comparable to (a), and non-substantial higher insertion loss. We strongly believe that such ROADM
architectures will play a growing role in reducing operational expenses in MRANs. While such functionality
complicates system design considerations, we have successfully implemented them in the above experiments. We
have specifically demonstrated the use of ROADMs maintaining the system performance already described. Figure
3 indicates the OSNR of 10 Gb/s channels between two hub nodes after transversing 6 intermediate ROADMs. The
OSNR of an 8 basic node path is also shown. A small (~1dB) improvement in the system penalty actually occurs
when the ROADMs are used due to improved control of channel non-uniformities. On the other hand, the small
additional loss in the ROADM nodes is sufficiently
accommodated by the optical amplifiers, allowing reach of
more than 7x25dB (12dB of OSNR with 0.5nm resolution
bandwidth) in G.652 fiber. We have further demonstrated
similar system performance when a combination of basic
and ROADM nodes is used, as well as in the presence of
power transients. We have finally evaluated our WDM
system performance also for the new generation of EML
transmitters that enable “hot-pluggable” WDM optical
modules on IP-routers/switches, and have established
OSNR performance for 13x15dB such ROADM networks.
We will discuss the system performance, and related trade-
offs in detail during our presentation.
In conclusion we present and analyze a practical 32 x 10 Gb/s WDM system design with reconfigurable
multi-node optical-add/drop that enables metro regional networks to cost-effectively scale to > 500 km with span
and installation/maintenance flexibility, exceeding the previously published related demonstrations.
References
[1] A. Saleh et al. “Architectural Principles of…”, J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 17, n 10, p. 2431-2448, Dec. 1999.
[2] Madamopoulos, et al. , "Design, transport performance study..." In OFC Technical Digest Series, 2002, Paper ThH6.
[3] D. Cavendish, “Evolution of Optical Transport Technologies…”, IEEE Comm., 38, 6
[4] Noirie, et al. , "32x10Gb/s DWDM Metro demonstration…", In OFC Technical Digest Series, 2002, Paper ThH4.
0
4
8
12
16
20
5
10 15 20 25
30
3 5
Span loss (dB)
0
2
4
6
8
1
0
1
2
AveOSNR minOSNR m i n OSNR_ n o ROAD M c a l c u l a t ed m i n OSNR D el t a OSNR C h s Ri p p l eF i g u r e 3
O SN R (dB)