7/23/14 Meeting

1. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
HASTINGS COLLEGE OF THE LAW
200 McALLISTER: KANE HALL PROGRAMMING + PLANNING
SPACE BLOCKING MEETING TWO OF TWO
07.23.14

2. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
AGENDA
2
REVIEW
1. GUIDING PRINCIPLES
2. FINALIZED CONCEPTUAL ORG. MODEL
3. MOVE-IN SPACES
DISCUSS
4. POTENTIAL PROGRAM BLOCKING SCENARIOS

3. GUIDING PRINCIPLES
AND BOUNDARIES
REVIEW
1.

4. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
4
PROCESS
• Engage all stakeholders in the project process.
• Provide a range of options for optimal strategies.
!
LONG RANGE CAMPUS PLAN
• All strategies will support the LRCP 1.0 and preceding strategic reports.
• Design for the needs of the students.
• Leverage 100 McAllister for potential revenue-generating opportunities.
• Increase student life and activity at 200 McAllister, and in particular the ground floor. Improve
first impressions of the campus.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
REVIEW

5. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
REVIEW
5
CLINICS, CENTERS, AND JOURNALS PROGRAMS
• Design to serve the mission(s), teachings, services, and scholarship of each clinic, center, and
journal.
• Serve the needs of both the individuals and the group for all programs.
• Integrate programs into the intellectual life of the students and the College.
• Provide opportunities for students and practitioners to work together and collaborate.
• Maintain and strengthen the unique identity and brand of each program.
• Maintain and improve the operations and physical relationships for each clinic, center, and
journal, as well as the inter-relationships between programs.
• Design with flexibility in mind – grants and funding swings often cause staff fluctuation.
• Design with clients in mind, which considers confidentiality and accessibility.
• Remain cutting-edge and innovative with regard to tools and technology in order to remain
competitive.
• Design with the consideration of economies of scale by maximizing staffing spaces and
developing common area spaces for similar or overlapping programs.
• Improve wayfinding and path of travel to the clinics, centers, and journals. Make them easily
accessible to the broader community.
• Ensure the security of students, faculty, staff, and the clinics, centers, and journals.
• Employ sustainable design by considering the use of natural light, material choices, and
furniture selection.
• Preserve the window line for shared and multi-functional space.

6. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
BOUNDARIES
REVIEW
6
MOVE-OUT
• Relocate all programs in the 3rd, 4th, 22nd, and 23rd floor of 100 McAllister to 200 McAllister.
• Consider the relocation of Health Services to a more private location on campus.
MOVE-IN
• Potential 200 McAllister relocation sites: 1st floor; 2nd floor health clinic; 4th and/or 6th floor
library).
• Minimize cost of renovation and avoid changes that necessitate major changes to building
systems.
• Preserve to the maximum extent possible previous investments in physical plant
improvements.
• Preserve or increase the amount of student study space and classrooms on campus.
• Preserve the special collections archive located on the 6th floor of 200 McAllister .
• Maintain the amount of private faculty offices located on the 6th floor of 200 McAllister .
• Journals must have 24 hour access.
• Prioritize approaches and projects that minimize construction period disruptions to ongoing
academic operations.
• All relocated programs will be moved in no later than January 2016.

7. FINALIZED
CONCEPTUAL ORG.
MODEL REVIEW
2.

8. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
8
CLASSROOM/
SEMINAR
CLASSROOM/
SEMINAR
CLASSROOM/
SEMINAR
CLASSROOM/
SEMINAR
CLASSROOM/
SEMINAR
CLASSROOM/
SEMINAR
CLASSROOM/
SEMINAR
CED
OFFICE/
WORKSTATIONS
CGA
OFFICE/
WORKSTATIONS
SEEE
OFFICE/
WORKSTATIONS
IR
OFFICE/
WORKSTATIONS
SMALL
MEETING
(2-6)
NEW CLINIC
OFFICE/
WORKSTATIONS
STUDENT
WORKSTATIONS
RECEPTION/
LOBBY
JOURNAL
OFFICE
JOURNAL
OFFICE
JOURNAL
OFFICE
JOURNAL
OFFICE
JOURNAL
OFFICE
JOURNAL
OFFICE
JOURNAL
OFFICE
JOURNAL
OFFICE
JOURNAL
OFFICE
PUBLISHING
OFFICE
MEETING
OFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCE
W
LL
RECEPTION
IN
2
MEETING
OFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCE
RECEPTION
C
O
NS.
MEETING
OFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCE
RECEPTION
FU
TURE
MEETING
OFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCE
RECEPTION
C
SLGL
MEETING
OFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCE
RECEPTION
C
GRS
MEETING
OFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCE
RECEPTION
CND
R
/ ME.
MEETING
OFFICES/
WORKSTATIONS
RESOURCE
RECEPTION
SMALL
MEETING
(2-6)
BREAKOUT BREAKOUT
BREAKOUT
BREAKOUTBREAKOUT
BREAKOUT
COPY
ROOM/
STORAGE
LOUNGE
BREAK/
KITCHEN
MEDIUM
MEETING
ROOM /
BREAK-OUT
(6-12)
COPY
ROOM/
STORAGE
RESOURCE
LIBRARY
LOUNGE
BREAK/
KITCHEN
SMALL
MEETING
(2-6)
SMALL
MEETING
(2-6)
MEDIUM
MEETING
ROOM /
BREAK-OUT
(6-12)
CLINICSCENTERS JOURNALS
GENERAL
FACULTY
MLPS
OFFICE/
WORKSTATIONS
RHRC
OFFICE/
WORKSTATIONS
FINALIZED ORG. MODEL
CONCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION MODEL – ALL PROGRAMS

9. MOVE-IN SPACES
3.

10. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
UNDERSTANDING EXISTING CONDITIONS
SPACE TEST FIT
10
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Total Existing
Space Program
Total Possible
Relocation Space
34,217 SF
25,346 SF
100 McAllister
198 McAllister
200 McAllister
1st Floor
6th Floor Opportunity
Classroomrs
Special Collections
Offices
Offices
Conf/Mtg/Resources
Instructional
Load/Circulation

11. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
11
OPPORTUNITY AREAS
200 MCALLISTER– 6TH FLOOR
6TH
FLOOR
OF LIBRARYOpp.
OPPORTUNITY AREA

12. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
12
OPPORTUNITY AREAS
MCALLISTER 200 – 1ST FLOOR
Opp.
Opp.
Opp.
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
FORMER
BOOKSTORE
BUSINESS
CENTER
CONF.
LOBBY
STUDENT
INFO CENTER
SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
LAW JOURNAL
SLJTJOURNAL
FORMER BOOKSTORE,
STUDENT CENTER,AND
BUSINESS CENTER
Opp.
OPPORTUNITY AREA

13. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
13
UNDERSTANDING EXISTING CONDITIONS
SPACE TEST FIT
DRAFT
Page 3 of 9
UC HASTINGS - KANE HALL PROGRAMMING & PLANNING
SPACE BLOCKING – Existing Square Footage Comparison
7.23.2014
Centers
Clinics
Journals
CLINICS
EXISTING ASF
CENTERS
EXISTING ASF
JOURNALS
EXISTING ASF

14. SPACE BLOCKING:
THREE SCENARIOS
4.

15. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
15
SCENARIO 1: FLEXIBILITY OPTIMIZATION
200 MCALLISTER 6TH FLOOR
DRAFT
Clinics / Centers / Journals
Interaction
Classroom / Seminar
General Offices
Student Study
Page 4 of 9
PROS:
Most flexible arrangement
maximizes ability for programs to
expand and contract smartly and
affordably
Clear delineation between research
programs and student spaces
CONS
Elongate space limits internal
layouts of programs; less
opportunity for brand identity
development
No “grand entrance sequence”
UC HASTINGS - KANE HALL PROGRAMMING + PLANNING
FLEXIBILITY OPTIMIZATION – Scenario 1 of 3
200 McAllister 6th
Floor
7.23.2014
PROS:
• Most flexible arrangement
maximizes ability for all programs to
expand and contract smartly and
affordably
• Clear delineation between research
programs and student spaces
CONS:
• Elongated space limits internal
layouts of programs; less
opportunity for brand identity
development
• No "grand entrance sequence”

16. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
DRAFT
Clinics / Centers / Journals
Interaction
Classroom / Seminar
General Offices
Student Study
Page 5 of 9
CONS
Research programs are “landlocked”
which makes expansion difficult
Student-oriented programs
(e.g. classrooms) are distributed
throughout potentially creating
traffic through research programs
PROS:
Orientation of program massing
optimizes ability to develop unique
identities within each program
space
Primary reception allows for “grand
entrance sequence”
Separation of front and back of the
house operations
UC HASTINGS - KANE HALL PROGRAMMING + PLANNING
IDENTITY DEVELOPMENT OPTIMIZATION – Scenario 2 of 3
200 McAllister 6th
Floor
7.23.2014
16
SCENARIO 2: IDENTITY OPTIMIZATION
200 MCALLISTER 6TH FLOOR
PROS:
• Primary reception allows for “grand
entrance sequence”
• Separation of front and back of the
house operations
CONS:
• Research programs are “landlocked”
which makes expansion difficult
• Student study space base limited
amount of natural light exposure

17. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
17
SCENARIO 3: WITH JOURNALS
200 MCALLISTER 6TH FLOOR
DRAFT
Clinics / Centers / Journals
Interaction
Classroom / Seminar
General Offices
Student Study
Page 6 of 9
PROS:
Locating a majority of classrooms
on the first floor may reduce traffic
and noise
CONS
Need to occupy first floor of
building in order to incorporate all
necessary programs
UC HASTINGS - KANE HALL PROGRAMMING + PLANNING
SPACE BLOCKING – Scenario 3 of 3
200 McAllister 6th
Floor
7.23.2014
PROS:
• Primary reception allows for “grand
entrance sequence”
• Locating a majority of classrooms
on the first floor responds to goals
of the LRCP and makes the first
floor of 200 McAllister a more
vibrant place on campus
CONS:
• Leaving the first floor open for the
relocation of HR and Fiscal in the
future also responds to the
recommendations in the LRCP to
consolidate all student services into
one building
• Student study space base limited
amount of natural light exposure

18. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
18
200 MCALLISTER 1ST FLOOR
DRAFT
Clinics / Centers / Journals
Interaction
Classroom / Seminar
General Offices
Student Study
Page 7 of 9
UC HASTINGS - KANE HALL PROGRAMMING + PLANNING
SPACE BLOCKING – Scenario 3 of 3
200 McAllister 1st
Floor
7.23.2014
PROS:
Locating a majority of classrooms
on the first floor may reduce traffic
and noise
CONS
Need to occupy first floor of
building in order to incorporate all
necessary programs
PROS:
• Primary reception allows for “grand
entrance sequence”
• Locating a majority of classrooms
on the first floor responds to goals
of the LRCP and makes the first
floor of 200 McAllister a more
vibrant place on campus
CONS:
• Leaving the first floor open for the
relocation of HR and Fiscal in the
future also responds to the
recommendations in the LRCP to
consolidate all student services into
one building
• Student study space base limited
amount of natural light exposure
SCENARIO 3: WITH JOURNALS

19. proprietary and confidential
UC Hastings College of the Law Kane Hall Programming and Planning
SCENARIO COMPARISON
PROS AND CONS
19
DR
Page 8 of 8
UC HASTINGS - KANE HALL PROGRAMMING & PLANNING
SPACE BLOCKING – Comparison
PROS:
Most flexible arrangement maximizes
ability for programs to expand and contract
smartly and affordably
Clear delineation between research
programs and student spaces
PROS:
Primary reception allows for “grand entrance
sequence”
Separation of front and back of the house
operations
PROS:
Primary reception allows for “grand entrance
sequence”
Locating a majority of classrooms on the
first floor responds to goals of the Long
Range Campus Plan and makes the first
floor of 200 McAllister a more vibrant place
on campus
CONS
Elongate space limits internal layouts
of programs; less opportunity for brand
identity development
No “grand entrance sequence”
CONS
Research programs are “landlocked” which
makes expansion difficult
Student Study Space has limited amount of
natural light exposure
CONS
Leaving the first floor open for the
relocation of HR and Fiscal in the future
also responds to recommendations in the
Long Range Campus Plan to consolidate all
student services into one building
Student Study Space has limited amount of
natural light exposure
1. FLEXIBILITY OPTIMIZATION 2. IDENTITY OPTIMIZATION 3. 6TH FLOOR W/JOURNALS
1. FLEXIBILITY OPTIMIZATION
!
PROS:
• Most flexible arrangement
maximizes ability for all programs to
expand and contract smartly and
affordably
• Clear delineation between research
programs and student spaces
!
CONS:
• Elongated space limits internal
layouts of programs; less
opportunity for brand identity
development
• No "grand entrance sequence”
2. IDENTITY OPTIMIZATION
!
PROS:
• Primary reception allows for “grand
entrance sequence”
• Separation of front and back of the
house operations
!
CONS:
• Research programs are “landlocked”
which makes expansion difficult
• Student study space base limited
amount of natural light exposure
3. 6TH FLOOR WITH JOURNALS
!
PROS:
• Primary reception allows for “grand
entrance sequence”
• Locating a majority of classrooms
on the first floor responds to goals
of the LRCP and makes the first
floor of 200 McAllister a more
vibrant place on campus
!
CONS:
• Leaving the first floor open for the
relocation of HR and Fiscal in the
future also responds to the
recommendations in the LRCP to
consolidate all student services into
one building
• Student study space base limited
amount of natural light exposure