SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
News Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FEBRUARY 6, 2014

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION ANNOUNCES 2014 ABSOLUTE
PRODUCTION GROWTH TARGET OF 2 – 4% ON PLANNED
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE DECREASE OF 20%
OKLAHOMA CITY, FEBRUARY 6, 2014 – Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE:CHK) today
announced details of its 2014 Outlook and capital program.





Expected total capital expenditures to range from $5.2 – $5.6 billion
Projected production growth of 8 – 10%, adjusted for asset sales
Estimated per-unit production and G&A expenses to decline 10% and 25%,
respectively, year over year
Targeted long-term production growth per debt-adjusted share of 5 – 9% annually

Doug Lawler, Chesapeake’s Chief Executive Officer, said, "2013 was a transformational year
for the company and its stakeholders. The Chesapeake team worked diligently on several
major initiatives designed to ensure that our processes and practices maximize returns from our
exceptional asset base. We have established specific strategic goals and metrics that we
believe will drive us toward top-quartile operational, financial and shareholder return
performance among our peers. Disciplined capital allocation, budget and cost leadership
programs are now in place, and I am very excited about Chesapeake’s opportunity to become a
differential investment and industry partner of choice in 2014 and beyond."
Capital Program and Production Outlook
Chesapeake is budgeting total capital expenditures in the range of $5.2 – $5.6 billion in 2014,
which represents a 20% reduction from the midpoint of Chesapeake’s 2013 capital expenditure
Outlook range. After adjusting for 2013 asset sales, the company expects to generate 8 – 10%
year-over-year production growth in 2014, consisting of 8 – 12% oil production growth, 44 – 49%
natural gas liquids production growth and 4 – 6% natural gas production growth. On an
absolute basis, Chesapeake is targeting 2014 production growth of 2 – 4%, which implies an
average daily production rate of 680 – 695 thousand barrels of oil equivalent (mboe).
Chesapeake plans to spud approximately 1,100 gross operated wells in 2014, which is relatively
unchanged from 2013 activity levels. The company plans to connect approximately 1,300 gross
operated wells to sales in 2014, or approximately 115 fewer wells than in 2013. Lawler
commented, "Our improving capital efficiency has made it possible for us to forecast similar
adjusted production growth in 2014 compared to 2013, despite a substantial reduction in capital
expenditures and approximately 8% fewer operated wells expected to be connected to sales."
Cost Overview
As a result of ongoing cost control initiatives, Chesapeake anticipates lower per-unit production
and general and administrative (G&A) expenses in 2014. Production expenses are expected to
range from $4.25 – $4.75 per barrel of oil equivalent (boe), down approximately 10% year over
year from the midpoint of Chesapeake’s 2013 production expense Outlook range. G&A
expenses (excluding restructuring and other termination benefits) are estimated to be $1.35 –
INVESTOR CONTACT:

MEDIA CONTACT:

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

Gary T. Clark, CFA
(405) 935-8870
ir@chk.com

Gordon Pennoyer
(405) 935-8878
media@chk.com

6100 North Western Avenue
P.O. Box 18496
Oklahoma City, OK 73154
$1.60 per boe, down approximately 25% year over year from the midpoint of Chesapeake’s
2013 G&A expense Outlook range.
Lawler concluded, "We are encouraged by the progress we have made during the second half
of 2013, and I look forward to our efforts yielding strong financial results in 2014. While our
guidance today does not reflect the impact of potential divestitures, we continue to pursue
opportunities to high-grade our portfolio through asset sales. We believe these transactions will
be value accretive and enable us to further reduce financial complexity and improve overall
leverage. Over the last eight months, we have conducted an extensive review of Chesapeake’s
portfolio. Due to the size and quality of the asset base, I am confident that by remaining
focused on our strategic priorities we can deliver long-term production growth per debt-adjusted
share of 5 – 9% annually, while maintaining a disciplined capital spending profile."
A complete summary of the company’s guidance for 2014 is provided in the Outlook dated
February 6, 2014, which is attached to this release as Schedule "A" beginning on Page 4.
Key Play Information
The following table details December 2013 average production rates, year-end drilled well
inventory, estimated 2014 exploration and production (E&P) capital expenditures and 2014
estimated operated rig count by play:
Dec '13 Avg.
Daily Net
Production
(m boe/d)

12/31/2013
Drilled Well
Inventory
(Gross Op'd)

2014E
% of
Total E&P
Capex(1)

2014E
Avg.
Operated
Rig Count

Eagle Ford

90

109

~35%

15 - 18

Mid-Continent(2)

100

32

~20%

15 - 17

Utica

35

195

~15%

7-9

Marcellus North

141

112

~10%

6-7

Haynesville

90

11

~10%

7-9

PRB Niobrara

7

46

~5%

3

Marcellus South

52

47

<5%

1

Barnett

74

58

<5%

1

Other

60

-

-

-

Total

649

610

Play

55-65

(1 Net o f Utica and P RB drilling carries; includes drilling, co mpletio n, leaseho ld, geo lo gical and geo physical co sts and capitalized G&A ; excludes capitalized interest
)
(2) Includes: M ississippian Lime, Cleveland, To nkawa, Co lo ny and Texas P anhandle Granite Washes and o ther A nadarko plays

2014 Analyst Day
Chesapeake will host its 2014 Analyst Day on Friday, May 16, 2014 at its headquarters in
Oklahoma City. The meeting will be webcast live on Chesapeake's website for those who are
unable to attend.
2014 Outlook and Capital Program Conference Call Information
A conference call to discuss this release has been scheduled for Thursday, February 6, 2014, at
9:00 am EST. The telephone number to access the conference call is 913-312-1521 or toll-free
888-264-8893. The passcode for the call is 7669165. We encourage those who would like to
participate in the call to place calls between 8:50 and 9:00 am EST. For those unable to
participate in the conference call, a replay will be available for audio playback at 2:00 pm EST
on Thursday, February 6, 2014, and will run through 2:00 pm EST on Thursday, February 20,
2014. The number to access the conference call replay is 719-457-0820 or toll-free 888-2031112. The passcode for the replay is 7669165. The conference call will also be webcast live on
Chesapeake’s website at www.chk.com in the "Events” subsection of the "Investors” section of
the company’s website. The webcast of the conference will be available on the company’s
website for one year.
2
Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE:CHK) is the second-largest producer of natural gas and the 11th largest producer
of oil and natural gas liquids in the U.S. Headquartered in Oklahoma City, the company's operations are focused on
discovering and developing its large and geographically diverse resource base of unconventional natural gas and oil
assets onshore in the U.S. The company also owns substantial marketing, compression and oilfield services businesses.
Further information is available at www.chk.com where Chesapeake routinely posts announcements, updates, events,
investor information, presentations and news releases.
This news release and the accompanying Outlook include "forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are statements other
than statements of historical fact that give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. They include production forecasts,
estimates of operating costs, planned development drilling, expected capital expenditures, expected efficiency gains, projected
operating cash flow, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations. Although we believe the expectations
and forecasts reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance they will prove to have been
correct. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results are described under "Risk Factors” in Item 1A of
our 2012 annual report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2013. These risk factors
include the volatility of natural gas, oil and NGL prices; the limitations our level of indebtedness may have on our financial flexibility;
declines in the prices of natural gas and oil potentially resulting in a write-down of our asset carrying values; the availability of capital
on an economic basis to fund reserve replacement costs; our ability to replace reserves and sustain production; uncertainties
inherent in estimating quantities of natural gas, oil and NGL reserves and projecting future rates of production and the amount and
timing of development expenditures; our ability to generate profits or achieve targeted results in drilling and well operations;
leasehold terms expiring before production can be established; hedging activities resulting in lower prices realized on natural gas, oil
and NGL sales; the need to secure hedging liabilities and the inability of hedging counterparties to satisfy their obligations; drilling
and operating risks, including potential environmental liabilities; legislative and regulatory changes adversely affecting our industry
and our business, including initiatives related to hydraulic fracturing, air emissions and endangered species; oilfield services
shortages, gathering system and transportation capacity constraints and various transportation interruptions that could adversely
affect our revenues and cash flow; losses possible from pending or future litigation and regulatory investigations; and cyber attacks
adversely impacting our operations. In addition, disclosures concerning the estimated contribution of derivative contracts to our
future results of operations are based upon market information as of a specific date. These market prices are subject to significant
volatility. Our production forecasts are also dependent upon many assumptions, including estimates of production decline rates
from existing wells and the outcome of future drilling activity. We caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this news release, and we undertake no obligation to update this information, except
as required by applicable law.

3
SCHEDULE "A”
MANAGEMENT’S OUTLOOK AS OF FEBRUARY 6, 2014
Chesapeake periodically provides management guidance on certain factors that affect the company’s future financial
performance. Please note that the company has changed its oil and natural gas unit equivalent reporting convention
to oil equivalent. Combined oil, natural gas and NGL volume amounts are shown below in boe rather than mcfe.

Chesapeake Energy Corporation Consolidated Projections
Year Ending
12/31/14
Absolute Production Growth:(a)
Liquids
Oil

14 – 18%
1 – 5%

NGL(b)
Natural gas
Total production
Daily Equivalent Rate – mboe
NYMEX Price(c) (for calculation of realized hedging effects only):
Oil - $/bbl
Natural gas - $/mcf

40 – 45%
(2) – 0%
2 – 4%
680 – 695
$90.40
$4.16

Estimated Realized Hedging Effects(d) (based on assumed NYMEX prices above):
Oil - $/bbl
Natural gas - $/mcf
Estimated Gathering/Marketing/Transportation/Basis Differentials to NYMEX Prices:
Oil - $/bbl
NGL - $/bbl
Natural gas - $/mcf
Operating Costs per Boe of Projected Production:
Production expense
Production taxes
General and administrative(e)
Stock-based compensation (noncash)
DD&A of natural gas and liquids assets
Depreciation of other assets
Interest expense(f)

($2.80)
($0.07)
$2.80 – 4.80
$63.00 – 67.00
$1.60 – 1.70
$4.25 – 4.75
$0.85 – 0.95
$1.20 – 1.40
$0.15 – 0.20
$10.50 – 11.50
$1.20 – 1.30
$0.95 – 1.05

Other ($ millions):
Marketing, gathering and compression net margin(g)
Oilfield services net margin

$50 – 70

(g)

$175 – 225

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and other

(h)

Book Tax Rate
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (in millions):
Basic
Diluted

($160 – 190)
38%
657 – 661
767 – 771

Operating Cash Flow before Changes in Assets and Liabilities ($ in millions)(i) (j)
Total Capital Expenditures ($ in millions)

$5,100 – 5,300
$5,200 – 5,600

a) Growth ranges based on the midpoint of company Outlook issued on 11/6/13.
b) Assumes ethane recovery in the Utica and Southern Marcellus to fulfill Chesapeake’s pipeline commitments, no ethane recovery in the Rockies,
minimal ethane recovery in the Eagle Ford and partial ethane recovery in the Mid-Continent.

c) NYMEX natural gas and oil prices have been updated for actual contract prices through February and January, respectively.
d) Includes expected settlements for commodity derivatives adjusted for option premiums. For derivatives closed early, settlements are reflected in
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)

the period of original contract expiration.
Excludes expenses associated with stock-based compensation and restructuring and other termination benefits.
Does not include gains (losses) on interest rate derivatives for settlement periods beyond 2014.
Includes revenue and operating costs and excludes depreciation and amortization of other assets.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust, CHK Utica, LLC and CHK Cleveland Tonkawa, LLC.
A non-GAAP financial measure. We are unable to provide reconciliation to projected cash provided by operating activities, the most comparable
GAAP measure, because of uncertainties associated with projecting future changes in assets and liabilities.
Assumes NYMEX prices on open contracts of $4.00 per mcf and $90.00 per bbl and production growth rate ranges as shown above.

4
Natural Gas, Oil and NGL Hedging Activities
Chesapeake enters into natural gas, oil and NGL derivative transactions in order to mitigate a portion of
its exposure to adverse changes in market prices. Please see the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and
annual reports on Form 10-K filed by Chesapeake with the SEC for detailed information about derivative
instruments the company uses, its quarter-end and year-end derivative positions and accounting for
natural gas, oil and NGL derivatives.
The company’s natural gas hedging positions as of January 31, 2014 were as follows:
Open Natural Gas Swaps; Gains (Losses) from Closed
Natural Gas Trades and Call Option Premiums
Open
Swaps
(bcf)

Avg. NYMEX
Price of
Open Swaps

Q1 2014

169

Q2 2014

106

4.08

(12)

Q3 2014

111

4.08

(15)

Q4 2014

111

4.08

(21)

Total 2014

497

$

4.18

$

(74)

Total 2015

44

$

4.53

$

(131)

0

$

—

$

(187)

Total 2016 – 2022

$

Total Gains (Losses) from
Closed Trades and Premiums
for Call Options
($ in millions)

4.36

$

(26)

Natural Gas Three-Way Collars
Open
Collars
(bcf)

Avg. NYMEX
Avg. NYMEX Bought Put Avg. NYMEX
Sold Put Price
Price
Ceiling Price

Q1 2014

48

$

3.57

$

4.08

$

4.39

Q2 2014

51

3.57

4.09

4.38

Q3 2014

57

3.55

4.09

4.38

Q4 2014

71

3.49

4.11

4.37

Total 2014

227

$

3.54

$

4.09

$

4.38

Total 2015

174

$

3.38

$

4.21

$

4.41

Natural Gas Swaptions
Swaptions
(bcf)

Avg. NYMEX
Strike Price

0

Q2 2014

12

4.80

Q3 2014

0

—

Q4 2014

0

—

Total 2014

12

$

—

Q1 2014

$

4.80

Natural Gas Written Call Options
Call Options
(bcf)
Total 2016 – 2020

193

5

Avg. NYMEX
Strike Price
$

9.92
Natural Gas Basis Protection Swaps
Volume
(bcf)
8
20
20
12
60
31
8

Q1 2014
Q2 2014
Q3 2014
Q4 2014
Total 2014
Total 2015
Total 2016 - 2022

Avg. NYMEX
plus/(minus)
$
1.68
(0.49)
(0.50)
(0.44)
$
(0.19)
$
(0.34)
$
(1.02)

The company’s crude oil hedging positions as of January 31, 2014 were as follows:
Open Crude Oil Swaps; Gains (Losses) from Closed
Crude Oil Trades and Call Option Premiums

Q1 2014
Q2 2014
Q3 2014
Q4 2014
Total 2014
Total 2015
Total 2016 – 2022

Open
Swaps
(mbbls)
7,217
7,114
5,137
5,112
24,580
693
0

Total Gains (Losses) from
Closed Trades and
Premiums for Call Options
($ in millions)
$
(44)
(46)
(48)
(49)
$
(187)
$
252
$
117

Avg. NYMEX
Price of
Open Swaps
$
94.37
93.97
93.57
93.58
$
93.92
$
89.48
$
—

Crude Oil Written Call Options
Call Options
(mbbls)
Q1 2014
Q2 2014
Q3 2014
Q4 2014

Avg. NYMEX
Strike Price

612
619
626
626

$

83.53

15,823
24,220

Total 2015
Total 2016 – 2017

83.53
83.53
83.53
83.53

2,483

Total 2014

$

$
$

93.12
100.07

Crude Oil Basis Protection Swaps
Volume
(mbbls)
Q1 2014
Q2 2014
Q3 2014
Q4 2014
Total 2014

90
91
92
92
365

6

Avg. NYMEX
plus
$
$
$
$
$

6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00

More Related Content

What's hot

Final august investor presentation
Final august investor presentationFinal august investor presentation
Final august investor presentationSandRidgeIR
 
AREX 2016 Wells Fargo West Coast Energy Presentation
AREX 2016 Wells Fargo West Coast Energy PresentationAREX 2016 Wells Fargo West Coast Energy Presentation
AREX 2016 Wells Fargo West Coast Energy PresentationApproachResources
 
AREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results Presentation
AREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results PresentationAREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results Presentation
AREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results PresentationApproachResources
 
Rengecy Energy Partners Analyst Day Presentation - Nov 2014 in Dallas, TX
Rengecy Energy Partners Analyst Day Presentation - Nov 2014 in Dallas, TXRengecy Energy Partners Analyst Day Presentation - Nov 2014 in Dallas, TX
Rengecy Energy Partners Analyst Day Presentation - Nov 2014 in Dallas, TXMarcellus Drilling News
 
EnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 Presentation
EnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 PresentationEnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 Presentation
EnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 PresentationApproachResources
 
Mason Graphite Corporate Presentation April 2016
Mason Graphite Corporate Presentation April 2016Mason Graphite Corporate Presentation April 2016
Mason Graphite Corporate Presentation April 2016masongraphite
 
Ubs conference-5 26-16
Ubs conference-5 26-16Ubs conference-5 26-16
Ubs conference-5 26-16Denbury
 
01 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation - final
01 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation - final01 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation - final
01 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation - finalRowanCompanies
 
27 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation
27 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation27 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation
27 mar-17 rdc investor-presentationRowanCompanies
 
Company website presentation (c) february 2017
Company website presentation (c)   february 2017Company website presentation (c)   february 2017
Company website presentation (c) february 2017AnteroResources
 
Jefferies presentation aug 2017 final
Jefferies presentation aug 2017 finalJefferies presentation aug 2017 final
Jefferies presentation aug 2017 finalGoldenStarResources
 
Q2 fy17 earnings presentation final3
Q2 fy17 earnings presentation   final3Q2 fy17 earnings presentation   final3
Q2 fy17 earnings presentation final3RoyalGold
 
Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16
Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16
Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16Denbury
 
Company website presentation march 2017
Company website presentation   march 2017Company website presentation   march 2017
Company website presentation march 2017AnteroResources
 
Dgc 17 04_4-6_dgf zurich corporate 1x1 presentation
Dgc 17 04_4-6_dgf zurich corporate 1x1 presentationDgc 17 04_4-6_dgf zurich corporate 1x1 presentation
Dgc 17 04_4-6_dgf zurich corporate 1x1 presentationDetourGold
 

What's hot (20)

Final august investor presentation
Final august investor presentationFinal august investor presentation
Final august investor presentation
 
AREX 2016 Wells Fargo West Coast Energy Presentation
AREX 2016 Wells Fargo West Coast Energy PresentationAREX 2016 Wells Fargo West Coast Energy Presentation
AREX 2016 Wells Fargo West Coast Energy Presentation
 
Scotia Howard Weil Energy Conference
Scotia Howard Weil Energy ConferenceScotia Howard Weil Energy Conference
Scotia Howard Weil Energy Conference
 
Barclays CEO Energy Conference
Barclays CEO Energy ConferenceBarclays CEO Energy Conference
Barclays CEO Energy Conference
 
AREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results Presentation
AREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results PresentationAREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results Presentation
AREX 2Q 2016 Earnings Results Presentation
 
Rengecy Energy Partners Analyst Day Presentation - Nov 2014 in Dallas, TX
Rengecy Energy Partners Analyst Day Presentation - Nov 2014 in Dallas, TXRengecy Energy Partners Analyst Day Presentation - Nov 2014 in Dallas, TX
Rengecy Energy Partners Analyst Day Presentation - Nov 2014 in Dallas, TX
 
EnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 Presentation
EnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 PresentationEnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 Presentation
EnerCom’s The Oil and Gas Conference 21 Presentation
 
Mason Graphite Corporate Presentation April 2016
Mason Graphite Corporate Presentation April 2016Mason Graphite Corporate Presentation April 2016
Mason Graphite Corporate Presentation April 2016
 
Ubs conference-5 26-16
Ubs conference-5 26-16Ubs conference-5 26-16
Ubs conference-5 26-16
 
01 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation - final
01 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation - final01 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation - final
01 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation - final
 
27 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation
27 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation27 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation
27 mar-17 rdc investor-presentation
 
Eog 0217
Eog 0217Eog 0217
Eog 0217
 
Company website presentation (c) february 2017
Company website presentation (c)   february 2017Company website presentation (c)   february 2017
Company website presentation (c) february 2017
 
CHK 2018 Q2 Earnings
CHK 2018 Q2 EarningsCHK 2018 Q2 Earnings
CHK 2018 Q2 Earnings
 
Jefferies presentation aug 2017 final
Jefferies presentation aug 2017 finalJefferies presentation aug 2017 final
Jefferies presentation aug 2017 final
 
Q2 fy17 earnings presentation final3
Q2 fy17 earnings presentation   final3Q2 fy17 earnings presentation   final3
Q2 fy17 earnings presentation final3
 
Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16
Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16
Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16
 
Company website presentation march 2017
Company website presentation   march 2017Company website presentation   march 2017
Company website presentation march 2017
 
Dgc 17 04_4-6_dgf zurich corporate 1x1 presentation
Dgc 17 04_4-6_dgf zurich corporate 1x1 presentationDgc 17 04_4-6_dgf zurich corporate 1x1 presentation
Dgc 17 04_4-6_dgf zurich corporate 1x1 presentation
 
August Investor Presentation
August Investor PresentationAugust Investor Presentation
August Investor Presentation
 

Similar to Chesapeake Energy 2014 Outlook & Capital Program

Chesapeake Energy Investory Presentation January 2014
Chesapeake Energy Investory Presentation January 2014Chesapeake Energy Investory Presentation January 2014
Chesapeake Energy Investory Presentation January 2014Marcellus Drilling News
 
Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015
Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015
Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
2012 analyst conference_final
2012 analyst conference_final2012 analyst conference_final
2012 analyst conference_finalAndy Varoshiotis
 
Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation Feb 2015
Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation Feb 2015Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation Feb 2015
Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation Feb 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
NAS PPT Investor Presentatiuon 4.16.15
NAS PPT Investor Presentatiuon 4.16.15NAS PPT Investor Presentatiuon 4.16.15
NAS PPT Investor Presentatiuon 4.16.15Bob Chance
 
TRCH, Torchlight Energy Oil and Gas Investor Article One on One
TRCH, Torchlight Energy Oil and Gas Investor Article One on OneTRCH, Torchlight Energy Oil and Gas Investor Article One on One
TRCH, Torchlight Energy Oil and Gas Investor Article One on OneDerek Gradwell
 
Investor Presentation March 2016
Investor Presentation March 2016Investor Presentation March 2016
Investor Presentation March 2016parsley2015ir
 
Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation - April 2013
Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation - April 2013Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation - April 2013
Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation - April 2013Marcellus Drilling News
 
Scotia Howard Weil 43rd Annual Energy Conference Presentation
Scotia Howard Weil 43rd Annual Energy Conference PresentationScotia Howard Weil 43rd Annual Energy Conference Presentation
Scotia Howard Weil 43rd Annual Energy Conference PresentationApproachResources
 
PVA IPAA OGIS NY Presentation
PVA IPAA OGIS NY PresentationPVA IPAA OGIS NY Presentation
PVA IPAA OGIS NY PresentationPennVirginiaCorp
 
Zep Inc. August 2014 Investor Presentation
Zep Inc. August 2014 Investor PresentationZep Inc. August 2014 Investor Presentation
Zep Inc. August 2014 Investor PresentationZep Inc.
 
April Investor Presentation
April Investor PresentationApril Investor Presentation
April Investor Presentationparsley2015ir
 
PVA June Investor Presentation
PVA June Investor PresentationPVA June Investor Presentation
PVA June Investor PresentationPennVirginiaCorp
 
Royal Dutch Shell plc capital markets day 2016
Royal Dutch Shell plc capital markets day 2016 Royal Dutch Shell plc capital markets day 2016
Royal Dutch Shell plc capital markets day 2016 Shell plc
 
Jefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slides
Jefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slidesJefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slides
Jefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slidesOshkosh_Investors
 
Jefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slides
Jefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slidesJefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slides
Jefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slidesOshkosh_Investors
 
Zep Inc. Investor Presentation
Zep Inc. Investor Presentation Zep Inc. Investor Presentation
Zep Inc. Investor Presentation Zep Inc.
 
PVA Howard Weil Presentation
PVA Howard Weil PresentationPVA Howard Weil Presentation
PVA Howard Weil PresentationPennVirginiaCorp
 
PVA Howard Weil Presentation
PVA Howard Weil PresentationPVA Howard Weil Presentation
PVA Howard Weil PresentationPennVirginiaCorp
 
PVA Investor Presentation 9 -2012
PVA Investor Presentation 9 -2012PVA Investor Presentation 9 -2012
PVA Investor Presentation 9 -2012PennVirginiaCorp
 

Similar to Chesapeake Energy 2014 Outlook & Capital Program (20)

Chesapeake Energy Investory Presentation January 2014
Chesapeake Energy Investory Presentation January 2014Chesapeake Energy Investory Presentation January 2014
Chesapeake Energy Investory Presentation January 2014
 
Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015
Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015
Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015
 
2012 analyst conference_final
2012 analyst conference_final2012 analyst conference_final
2012 analyst conference_final
 
Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation Feb 2015
Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation Feb 2015Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation Feb 2015
Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation Feb 2015
 
NAS PPT Investor Presentatiuon 4.16.15
NAS PPT Investor Presentatiuon 4.16.15NAS PPT Investor Presentatiuon 4.16.15
NAS PPT Investor Presentatiuon 4.16.15
 
TRCH, Torchlight Energy Oil and Gas Investor Article One on One
TRCH, Torchlight Energy Oil and Gas Investor Article One on OneTRCH, Torchlight Energy Oil and Gas Investor Article One on One
TRCH, Torchlight Energy Oil and Gas Investor Article One on One
 
Investor Presentation March 2016
Investor Presentation March 2016Investor Presentation March 2016
Investor Presentation March 2016
 
Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation - April 2013
Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation - April 2013Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation - April 2013
Chesapeake Energy Investor Presentation - April 2013
 
Scotia Howard Weil 43rd Annual Energy Conference Presentation
Scotia Howard Weil 43rd Annual Energy Conference PresentationScotia Howard Weil 43rd Annual Energy Conference Presentation
Scotia Howard Weil 43rd Annual Energy Conference Presentation
 
PVA IPAA OGIS NY Presentation
PVA IPAA OGIS NY PresentationPVA IPAA OGIS NY Presentation
PVA IPAA OGIS NY Presentation
 
Zep Inc. August 2014 Investor Presentation
Zep Inc. August 2014 Investor PresentationZep Inc. August 2014 Investor Presentation
Zep Inc. August 2014 Investor Presentation
 
April Investor Presentation
April Investor PresentationApril Investor Presentation
April Investor Presentation
 
PVA June Investor Presentation
PVA June Investor PresentationPVA June Investor Presentation
PVA June Investor Presentation
 
Royal Dutch Shell plc capital markets day 2016
Royal Dutch Shell plc capital markets day 2016 Royal Dutch Shell plc capital markets day 2016
Royal Dutch Shell plc capital markets day 2016
 
Jefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slides
Jefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slidesJefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slides
Jefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slides
 
Jefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slides
Jefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slidesJefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slides
Jefferies 2014 Global Industrials Conference slides
 
Zep Inc. Investor Presentation
Zep Inc. Investor Presentation Zep Inc. Investor Presentation
Zep Inc. Investor Presentation
 
PVA Howard Weil Presentation
PVA Howard Weil PresentationPVA Howard Weil Presentation
PVA Howard Weil Presentation
 
PVA Howard Weil Presentation
PVA Howard Weil PresentationPVA Howard Weil Presentation
PVA Howard Weil Presentation
 
PVA Investor Presentation 9 -2012
PVA Investor Presentation 9 -2012PVA Investor Presentation 9 -2012
PVA Investor Presentation 9 -2012
 

More from Marcellus Drilling News

Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongFive facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongMarcellus Drilling News
 
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Marcellus Drilling News
 
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateAccess Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateMarcellus Drilling News
 
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateRover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateMarcellus Drilling News
 
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesDOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesMarcellus Drilling News
 
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingLSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingMarcellus Drilling News
 
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Marcellus Drilling News
 
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesReport: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesMarcellus Drilling News
 
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsVelocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsMarcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...Marcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...Marcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsPA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsMarcellus Drilling News
 
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookUS EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookMarcellus Drilling News
 
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideNortheast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideMarcellus Drilling News
 
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditPA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditMarcellus Drilling News
 
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Marcellus Drilling News
 
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportClyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportMarcellus Drilling News
 
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectFERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectMarcellus Drilling News
 

More from Marcellus Drilling News (20)

Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongFive facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
 
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
 
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateAccess Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
 
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateRover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
 
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesDOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
 
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingLSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
 
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
 
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesReport: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
 
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
 
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
 
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsVelocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
 
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
 
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
 
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsPA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
 
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookUS EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
 
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideNortheast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
 
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditPA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
 
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
 
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportClyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
 
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectFERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
 

Recently uploaded

13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
Geostrategic significance of South Asian countries.ppt
Geostrategic significance of South Asian countries.pptGeostrategic significance of South Asian countries.ppt
Geostrategic significance of South Asian countries.pptUsmanKaran
 
Political-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptx
Political-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptxPolitical-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptx
Political-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptxSasikiranMarri
 
Power in International Relations (Pol 5)
Power in International Relations (Pol 5)Power in International Relations (Pol 5)
Power in International Relations (Pol 5)ssuser583c35
 
11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 

Recently uploaded (6)

13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Geostrategic significance of South Asian countries.ppt
Geostrategic significance of South Asian countries.pptGeostrategic significance of South Asian countries.ppt
Geostrategic significance of South Asian countries.ppt
 
Political-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptx
Political-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptxPolitical-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptx
Political-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptx
 
Power in International Relations (Pol 5)
Power in International Relations (Pol 5)Power in International Relations (Pol 5)
Power in International Relations (Pol 5)
 
11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 

Chesapeake Energy 2014 Outlook & Capital Program

  • 1. News Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FEBRUARY 6, 2014 CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION ANNOUNCES 2014 ABSOLUTE PRODUCTION GROWTH TARGET OF 2 – 4% ON PLANNED CAPITAL EXPENDITURE DECREASE OF 20% OKLAHOMA CITY, FEBRUARY 6, 2014 – Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE:CHK) today announced details of its 2014 Outlook and capital program.     Expected total capital expenditures to range from $5.2 – $5.6 billion Projected production growth of 8 – 10%, adjusted for asset sales Estimated per-unit production and G&A expenses to decline 10% and 25%, respectively, year over year Targeted long-term production growth per debt-adjusted share of 5 – 9% annually Doug Lawler, Chesapeake’s Chief Executive Officer, said, "2013 was a transformational year for the company and its stakeholders. The Chesapeake team worked diligently on several major initiatives designed to ensure that our processes and practices maximize returns from our exceptional asset base. We have established specific strategic goals and metrics that we believe will drive us toward top-quartile operational, financial and shareholder return performance among our peers. Disciplined capital allocation, budget and cost leadership programs are now in place, and I am very excited about Chesapeake’s opportunity to become a differential investment and industry partner of choice in 2014 and beyond." Capital Program and Production Outlook Chesapeake is budgeting total capital expenditures in the range of $5.2 – $5.6 billion in 2014, which represents a 20% reduction from the midpoint of Chesapeake’s 2013 capital expenditure Outlook range. After adjusting for 2013 asset sales, the company expects to generate 8 – 10% year-over-year production growth in 2014, consisting of 8 – 12% oil production growth, 44 – 49% natural gas liquids production growth and 4 – 6% natural gas production growth. On an absolute basis, Chesapeake is targeting 2014 production growth of 2 – 4%, which implies an average daily production rate of 680 – 695 thousand barrels of oil equivalent (mboe). Chesapeake plans to spud approximately 1,100 gross operated wells in 2014, which is relatively unchanged from 2013 activity levels. The company plans to connect approximately 1,300 gross operated wells to sales in 2014, or approximately 115 fewer wells than in 2013. Lawler commented, "Our improving capital efficiency has made it possible for us to forecast similar adjusted production growth in 2014 compared to 2013, despite a substantial reduction in capital expenditures and approximately 8% fewer operated wells expected to be connected to sales." Cost Overview As a result of ongoing cost control initiatives, Chesapeake anticipates lower per-unit production and general and administrative (G&A) expenses in 2014. Production expenses are expected to range from $4.25 – $4.75 per barrel of oil equivalent (boe), down approximately 10% year over year from the midpoint of Chesapeake’s 2013 production expense Outlook range. G&A expenses (excluding restructuring and other termination benefits) are estimated to be $1.35 – INVESTOR CONTACT: MEDIA CONTACT: CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION Gary T. Clark, CFA (405) 935-8870 ir@chk.com Gordon Pennoyer (405) 935-8878 media@chk.com 6100 North Western Avenue P.O. Box 18496 Oklahoma City, OK 73154
  • 2. $1.60 per boe, down approximately 25% year over year from the midpoint of Chesapeake’s 2013 G&A expense Outlook range. Lawler concluded, "We are encouraged by the progress we have made during the second half of 2013, and I look forward to our efforts yielding strong financial results in 2014. While our guidance today does not reflect the impact of potential divestitures, we continue to pursue opportunities to high-grade our portfolio through asset sales. We believe these transactions will be value accretive and enable us to further reduce financial complexity and improve overall leverage. Over the last eight months, we have conducted an extensive review of Chesapeake’s portfolio. Due to the size and quality of the asset base, I am confident that by remaining focused on our strategic priorities we can deliver long-term production growth per debt-adjusted share of 5 – 9% annually, while maintaining a disciplined capital spending profile." A complete summary of the company’s guidance for 2014 is provided in the Outlook dated February 6, 2014, which is attached to this release as Schedule "A" beginning on Page 4. Key Play Information The following table details December 2013 average production rates, year-end drilled well inventory, estimated 2014 exploration and production (E&P) capital expenditures and 2014 estimated operated rig count by play: Dec '13 Avg. Daily Net Production (m boe/d) 12/31/2013 Drilled Well Inventory (Gross Op'd) 2014E % of Total E&P Capex(1) 2014E Avg. Operated Rig Count Eagle Ford 90 109 ~35% 15 - 18 Mid-Continent(2) 100 32 ~20% 15 - 17 Utica 35 195 ~15% 7-9 Marcellus North 141 112 ~10% 6-7 Haynesville 90 11 ~10% 7-9 PRB Niobrara 7 46 ~5% 3 Marcellus South 52 47 <5% 1 Barnett 74 58 <5% 1 Other 60 - - - Total 649 610 Play 55-65 (1 Net o f Utica and P RB drilling carries; includes drilling, co mpletio n, leaseho ld, geo lo gical and geo physical co sts and capitalized G&A ; excludes capitalized interest ) (2) Includes: M ississippian Lime, Cleveland, To nkawa, Co lo ny and Texas P anhandle Granite Washes and o ther A nadarko plays 2014 Analyst Day Chesapeake will host its 2014 Analyst Day on Friday, May 16, 2014 at its headquarters in Oklahoma City. The meeting will be webcast live on Chesapeake's website for those who are unable to attend. 2014 Outlook and Capital Program Conference Call Information A conference call to discuss this release has been scheduled for Thursday, February 6, 2014, at 9:00 am EST. The telephone number to access the conference call is 913-312-1521 or toll-free 888-264-8893. The passcode for the call is 7669165. We encourage those who would like to participate in the call to place calls between 8:50 and 9:00 am EST. For those unable to participate in the conference call, a replay will be available for audio playback at 2:00 pm EST on Thursday, February 6, 2014, and will run through 2:00 pm EST on Thursday, February 20, 2014. The number to access the conference call replay is 719-457-0820 or toll-free 888-2031112. The passcode for the replay is 7669165. The conference call will also be webcast live on Chesapeake’s website at www.chk.com in the "Events” subsection of the "Investors” section of the company’s website. The webcast of the conference will be available on the company’s website for one year. 2
  • 3. Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE:CHK) is the second-largest producer of natural gas and the 11th largest producer of oil and natural gas liquids in the U.S. Headquartered in Oklahoma City, the company's operations are focused on discovering and developing its large and geographically diverse resource base of unconventional natural gas and oil assets onshore in the U.S. The company also owns substantial marketing, compression and oilfield services businesses. Further information is available at www.chk.com where Chesapeake routinely posts announcements, updates, events, investor information, presentations and news releases. This news release and the accompanying Outlook include "forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are statements other than statements of historical fact that give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. They include production forecasts, estimates of operating costs, planned development drilling, expected capital expenditures, expected efficiency gains, projected operating cash flow, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations. Although we believe the expectations and forecasts reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance they will prove to have been correct. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results are described under "Risk Factors” in Item 1A of our 2012 annual report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2013. These risk factors include the volatility of natural gas, oil and NGL prices; the limitations our level of indebtedness may have on our financial flexibility; declines in the prices of natural gas and oil potentially resulting in a write-down of our asset carrying values; the availability of capital on an economic basis to fund reserve replacement costs; our ability to replace reserves and sustain production; uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of natural gas, oil and NGL reserves and projecting future rates of production and the amount and timing of development expenditures; our ability to generate profits or achieve targeted results in drilling and well operations; leasehold terms expiring before production can be established; hedging activities resulting in lower prices realized on natural gas, oil and NGL sales; the need to secure hedging liabilities and the inability of hedging counterparties to satisfy their obligations; drilling and operating risks, including potential environmental liabilities; legislative and regulatory changes adversely affecting our industry and our business, including initiatives related to hydraulic fracturing, air emissions and endangered species; oilfield services shortages, gathering system and transportation capacity constraints and various transportation interruptions that could adversely affect our revenues and cash flow; losses possible from pending or future litigation and regulatory investigations; and cyber attacks adversely impacting our operations. In addition, disclosures concerning the estimated contribution of derivative contracts to our future results of operations are based upon market information as of a specific date. These market prices are subject to significant volatility. Our production forecasts are also dependent upon many assumptions, including estimates of production decline rates from existing wells and the outcome of future drilling activity. We caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this news release, and we undertake no obligation to update this information, except as required by applicable law. 3
  • 4. SCHEDULE "A” MANAGEMENT’S OUTLOOK AS OF FEBRUARY 6, 2014 Chesapeake periodically provides management guidance on certain factors that affect the company’s future financial performance. Please note that the company has changed its oil and natural gas unit equivalent reporting convention to oil equivalent. Combined oil, natural gas and NGL volume amounts are shown below in boe rather than mcfe. Chesapeake Energy Corporation Consolidated Projections Year Ending 12/31/14 Absolute Production Growth:(a) Liquids Oil 14 – 18% 1 – 5% NGL(b) Natural gas Total production Daily Equivalent Rate – mboe NYMEX Price(c) (for calculation of realized hedging effects only): Oil - $/bbl Natural gas - $/mcf 40 – 45% (2) – 0% 2 – 4% 680 – 695 $90.40 $4.16 Estimated Realized Hedging Effects(d) (based on assumed NYMEX prices above): Oil - $/bbl Natural gas - $/mcf Estimated Gathering/Marketing/Transportation/Basis Differentials to NYMEX Prices: Oil - $/bbl NGL - $/bbl Natural gas - $/mcf Operating Costs per Boe of Projected Production: Production expense Production taxes General and administrative(e) Stock-based compensation (noncash) DD&A of natural gas and liquids assets Depreciation of other assets Interest expense(f) ($2.80) ($0.07) $2.80 – 4.80 $63.00 – 67.00 $1.60 – 1.70 $4.25 – 4.75 $0.85 – 0.95 $1.20 – 1.40 $0.15 – 0.20 $10.50 – 11.50 $1.20 – 1.30 $0.95 – 1.05 Other ($ millions): Marketing, gathering and compression net margin(g) Oilfield services net margin $50 – 70 (g) $175 – 225 Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and other (h) Book Tax Rate Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (in millions): Basic Diluted ($160 – 190) 38% 657 – 661 767 – 771 Operating Cash Flow before Changes in Assets and Liabilities ($ in millions)(i) (j) Total Capital Expenditures ($ in millions) $5,100 – 5,300 $5,200 – 5,600 a) Growth ranges based on the midpoint of company Outlook issued on 11/6/13. b) Assumes ethane recovery in the Utica and Southern Marcellus to fulfill Chesapeake’s pipeline commitments, no ethane recovery in the Rockies, minimal ethane recovery in the Eagle Ford and partial ethane recovery in the Mid-Continent. c) NYMEX natural gas and oil prices have been updated for actual contract prices through February and January, respectively. d) Includes expected settlements for commodity derivatives adjusted for option premiums. For derivatives closed early, settlements are reflected in e) f) g) h) i) j) the period of original contract expiration. Excludes expenses associated with stock-based compensation and restructuring and other termination benefits. Does not include gains (losses) on interest rate derivatives for settlement periods beyond 2014. Includes revenue and operating costs and excludes depreciation and amortization of other assets. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust, CHK Utica, LLC and CHK Cleveland Tonkawa, LLC. A non-GAAP financial measure. We are unable to provide reconciliation to projected cash provided by operating activities, the most comparable GAAP measure, because of uncertainties associated with projecting future changes in assets and liabilities. Assumes NYMEX prices on open contracts of $4.00 per mcf and $90.00 per bbl and production growth rate ranges as shown above. 4
  • 5. Natural Gas, Oil and NGL Hedging Activities Chesapeake enters into natural gas, oil and NGL derivative transactions in order to mitigate a portion of its exposure to adverse changes in market prices. Please see the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual reports on Form 10-K filed by Chesapeake with the SEC for detailed information about derivative instruments the company uses, its quarter-end and year-end derivative positions and accounting for natural gas, oil and NGL derivatives. The company’s natural gas hedging positions as of January 31, 2014 were as follows: Open Natural Gas Swaps; Gains (Losses) from Closed Natural Gas Trades and Call Option Premiums Open Swaps (bcf) Avg. NYMEX Price of Open Swaps Q1 2014 169 Q2 2014 106 4.08 (12) Q3 2014 111 4.08 (15) Q4 2014 111 4.08 (21) Total 2014 497 $ 4.18 $ (74) Total 2015 44 $ 4.53 $ (131) 0 $ — $ (187) Total 2016 – 2022 $ Total Gains (Losses) from Closed Trades and Premiums for Call Options ($ in millions) 4.36 $ (26) Natural Gas Three-Way Collars Open Collars (bcf) Avg. NYMEX Avg. NYMEX Bought Put Avg. NYMEX Sold Put Price Price Ceiling Price Q1 2014 48 $ 3.57 $ 4.08 $ 4.39 Q2 2014 51 3.57 4.09 4.38 Q3 2014 57 3.55 4.09 4.38 Q4 2014 71 3.49 4.11 4.37 Total 2014 227 $ 3.54 $ 4.09 $ 4.38 Total 2015 174 $ 3.38 $ 4.21 $ 4.41 Natural Gas Swaptions Swaptions (bcf) Avg. NYMEX Strike Price 0 Q2 2014 12 4.80 Q3 2014 0 — Q4 2014 0 — Total 2014 12 $ — Q1 2014 $ 4.80 Natural Gas Written Call Options Call Options (bcf) Total 2016 – 2020 193 5 Avg. NYMEX Strike Price $ 9.92
  • 6. Natural Gas Basis Protection Swaps Volume (bcf) 8 20 20 12 60 31 8 Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Total 2014 Total 2015 Total 2016 - 2022 Avg. NYMEX plus/(minus) $ 1.68 (0.49) (0.50) (0.44) $ (0.19) $ (0.34) $ (1.02) The company’s crude oil hedging positions as of January 31, 2014 were as follows: Open Crude Oil Swaps; Gains (Losses) from Closed Crude Oil Trades and Call Option Premiums Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Total 2014 Total 2015 Total 2016 – 2022 Open Swaps (mbbls) 7,217 7,114 5,137 5,112 24,580 693 0 Total Gains (Losses) from Closed Trades and Premiums for Call Options ($ in millions) $ (44) (46) (48) (49) $ (187) $ 252 $ 117 Avg. NYMEX Price of Open Swaps $ 94.37 93.97 93.57 93.58 $ 93.92 $ 89.48 $ — Crude Oil Written Call Options Call Options (mbbls) Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Avg. NYMEX Strike Price 612 619 626 626 $ 83.53 15,823 24,220 Total 2015 Total 2016 – 2017 83.53 83.53 83.53 83.53 2,483 Total 2014 $ $ $ 93.12 100.07 Crude Oil Basis Protection Swaps Volume (mbbls) Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Total 2014 90 91 92 92 365 6 Avg. NYMEX plus $ $ $ $ $ 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00