SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
Independent	Fiscal	Of ice						February	2015 	 	 	 									1	
Research	Brief	2015‐2																																																																																																									February	2015 
Impact Fee Update
	
Since	 2012,	 Pennsylvania	 has	 imposed	 an	 annual	
impact	fee	on	unconventional	(e.g.,	shale)	natural	gas	
wells	 that	 were	 drilled	 or	 operating	 in	 the	 previous	
calendar	 year.	 This	 research	 brief	 estimates	 the	
calendar	 year	 2014	 impact	 fee	 revenues	 (to	 be	
remitted	 in	 April	 2015)	 using	 data	 from	 the	
Department	 of	 Environmental	 Protection	 (DEP)	 and	
the	 Public	 Utility	 Commission	 (PUC).	 The	 research	
brief	 also	 translates	 the	 impact	 fee	 into	 an	 annual	
average	 effective	 tax	 rate	 (ETR)	 based	 on	 recent	
natural	 gas	 price	 and	 production	 data.	 The	 ETR	 is	 a	
metric	that	quanti ies	the	implicit	tax	burden	imposed	
by	the	impact	fee	in	a	given	year.	
From	calendar	year	(CY)	2011	to	CY	2013,	the	impact	
fee	 generated	 approximately	 $632	 million	 in	
revenues,	 which	 were	 distributed	 to	 local	
governments	 and	 state	 agencies	 to	 offset	 the	 impact	
from	 unconventional	 	 natural	 gas	 extraction.	 The	
proceeds	 are	 used	 to	 provide	 for	 infrastructure,	
emergency	 services,	 environmental	 initiatives	 and	
various	other	programs.	(See	Table	1.)		By	statute,	the	
distributions	 to	 Commonwealth	 agencies	 occur	 irst	
and	remain	constant	from	year	to	year.	The	balance	of	
funds	 are	 then	 distributed	 to	 local	 governments,	 the	
Marcellus	 Legacy	 Fund,	 and	 the	 Housing	 and	
Rehabilitation	 Enhancement	 Fund	 (HARE	 Fund).	
Counties	 and	 municipalities	 receive	 funds	 based	 on	
the	prevalence	of	drilling	activity	in	each	jurisdiction	
or	 their	 proximity	 to	 jurisdictions	 in	 which	 drilling	
activity	takes	place.		
I 	
Table	1:	Impact	Fee	Revenues	and	Distributions	
		 2011	 2012	 2013	 2014	
		Total	Revenues	 $204,210		 $202,472		 $225,752		 	$220,400		
Counties,	Municipalities	and	HARE	Fund1	 		108,726		 		107,683		 		123,151		 			121,350	
Marcellus	Legacy	Fund	 					82,484		 					79,289		 					84,601		 					81,000	
Commonwealth	Agencies	 					10,500		 					10,500		 					10,500		 					10,500		
County	and	State	Conservation	Districts/Commission2	 							2,500		 							5,000		 							7,500		 							7,550		
Note:	Dollar	amounts	in	thousands.	The	CY	2014	estimates	by	the	Independent	Fiscal	Of ice.	
Source:	Pennsylvania	Public	Utility	Commission.		
1	Housing	Affordability	and	Rehabilitation	Enhancement	Fund.		
2	The	distribution	to	the	County	Conservation	Districts	is	set	by	statute	to	increase	by	increments	of	$2.5	million	from	2011	
to	2013,	and	thereafter	to	increase	by	the	CPI‐U	as	published	by	the	U.S.	Bureau	of	Labor	Statistics.	
	
2014	I 	F 	E 	
The	annual	impact	fee	for	an	unconventional	natural	
gas	 well	 is	 determined	 according	 to	 a	 bracketed	
schedule	 based	 on	 the	 number	 of	 years	 since	 a	 well	
became	subject	to	the	impact	fee	(operating	year),	the	
type	of	well	(horizontal	or	vertical)	and,	to	a	limited	
extent,	the	average	annual	price	of	natural	gas.1	Table	
2	 on	 the	 following	 page	 displays	 the	 applicable	 fee	
schedule	for	CY	2011	to	CY	2014.	
For	 2014,	 estimates	 of	 the	 number	 of	 wells	 by	
operating	 year	 and	 type	 are	 based	 on	 an	 analysis	 of	
statewide	well	production	data	published	by	the	DEP	
and	 historical	 impact	 fee	 payment	 data	 provided	 by	
the	 PUC.	 Two	 primary	 factors	 inform	 the	 CY	 2014	
impact	fee	estimate:	
 A	 well’s	 operating	 year	 is	 determined	 by	 its	 spud	
date,	 a	 point	 in	 time	 that	 represents	 the	 onset	 of	
drilling	activity.	Thus,	a	well	spud	in	2014	is	in	its	
irst	operating	year	for	the	purpose	of	the	CY	2014	
estimate.	
	
 Wells	 that	 produce	 less	 than	 90	 Mcf	 (thousand	
cubic	 feet)	 of	 natural	 gas	 per	 day	 on	 average	 are	
known	as	“stripper	wells.”	By	statute,	all	horizontal	
wells	 must	 remit	 the	 impact	 fee	 for	 three	 years,	
regardless	 of	 production	 levels.	 Following	 that	
three‐year	 period,	 horizontal	 wells	 that	 qualify	 as	
stripper	 wells	 are	 exempt	 from	 the	 impact	 fee.	
Vertical	wells	that	produce	gas	at	the	stripper	well	
level	 are	 exempt	 from	 the	 fee,	 regardless	 of	
operating	year.
Independent	Fiscal	Of ice						February	2015 	 	 									 									2	
 
Based	on	the	analysis,	the	following	well	counts	were	
used	to	inform	the	CY	2014	impact	fee	estimate:2	
	
 1,360	new	wells	(in	operating	year	1);	
	
 5,909	 existing	 wells	 (1,199	 in	 operating	 year	 2,	
1,282	in	year	3	and	3,428	in	year	4);	and	
	
 1,093	 stripper	 wells	 that	 are	 not	 subject	 to	 the	
impact	 fee	 (not	 shown	 in	 Figure	 1).	 This	 includes	
horizontal	stripper	wells	in	their	 fourth	operating	
year	 and	 vertical	 stripper	 wells.	 Without	 the	
exemption	 for	 horizontal	 stripper	 wells,	 the	
number	 of	 wells	 in	 their	 fourth	 operating	 year	 in	
2014	would	be	considerably	higher	than	the	3,428	
wells	cited	in	the	above	bullet.	
	
The	 CY	 2014	 impact	 fee	 estimate	 is	 $220.4	 million,	
which	is	based	on	the	published	fee	schedule	and	the	
estimated	well	counts	listed	in	Figure	1.	The	CY	2014	
impact	fee	differs	from	previous	years	in	two	respects.	
First,	 2014	 was	 the	 first	 year	 that	 the	 number	 of	
unconventional	wells	spud	in	Pennsylvania	exceeded	
the	 number	 spud	 in	 the	 prior	 year.	 Due	 to	 that	
outcome,	 the	 statute	 requires	 the	 PUC	 to	 apply	 a	
regional	inflation	adjustment	to	the	fee	schedule.	The	
inflation	 adjustment	 will	 increase	 collections	 by	 an	
estimated	$1.2	million.	Second,	2014	was	the	first	year	
in	which	horizontal	stripper	wells	were	eligible	for	an	
exemption	after	paying	the	fee	for	three	years	(i.e.,	in	
their	 fourth	 operating	 year).	 The	 horizontal	 stripper	
well	 exemption	 will	 decrease	 collections	 by	 an	
estimated	$8.7	million.	
	
	
	
	
Table	2:	Impact	Fee	Schedule	for	Horizontal	Wells1 
Operating	Year	 CY	2011	 CY	20122	 CY	2013	 CY	20143	
1	 	 $50,000	 	 $45,000	 	 $50,000	 	 $50,300	
2	 	 ‐	 	 	35,000	 	 40,000	 	 40,200	
3	 	 ‐	 	 ‐	 	 30,000	 	 30,200	
4	 	 ‐	 	 ‐	 	 ‐	 	 20,100	
		Source:	Pennsylvania	Public	Utility	Commission.	
			1	Vertical	wells	are	subject	to	20	percent	of	the	fee	levied	on	horizontal	wells.	
			2	The	fees	for	CY	2012	are	lower	than	the	fees	for	other	years	because	the	annual	average	price	of	natural	gas	on	the	New	
York	Mercantile	Exchange	($2.78	per	MMbtu)	dropped	below	the	$3.00	per	MMbtu	threshold	established	in	statute.		
		3	Includes	a	regional	in lationary	adjustment	of	0.6%	as	reported	by	the	Pennsylvania	Public	Utility	Commission.	
	 Source:	Pennsylvania	Public	Utility	Commission	and	Pennsylvania	
	 Department	of	Environmental	Protection.	The	CY	2014	estimate	
	 by	the	Independent	Fiscal	Of ice.	
	 1	New	wells	are	wells	spud	in	the	corresponding	year	that	remit	
the	impact	fee.	Existing	wells	are	wells	spud	in	prior	years	that	
remit	the	impact	fee.	
	 2	The	 irst	year	of	the	impact	fee	was	2011.	All	wells	in	that	year	
were	classi ied	as	new,	regardless	of	spud	date.		
Figure	1:	New	and	Existing	Wells1	
(1,500) 500 2,500 4,500 6,500
New
Existing
New
Existing
New
Existing
New
2014201320122011
1,188
5,089
1,309
4,015
4,022
232
52
215
311
58
Horizontal Vertical
5,738
1,347 13
171
2
 
Independent	Fiscal	Of ice						February	2015 	 	 									 									3	
 
E 	T 	R 	
Because	 the	 impact	 fee	 does	 not	 directly	 respond	 to	
the	price	of	natural	gas	or	the	volume	of	production,	it	
does	not	provide	a	measure	of	tax	burden	relative	to	
natural	gas	sales.	For	that	purpose,	this	research	brief	
computes	an	annual	average	ETR.3	The	ETR	is	equal	to	
the	 annual	 impact	 fee	 revenues	 divided	 by	 the	 total	
market	 value	 of	 unconventional	 natural	 gas	
production.	 The	market	value	is	equal	to	the	product	
of	(1)	the	annual	average	regional	price	of	natural	gas	
net	 of	 post‐production	 costs	 and	 (2)	 the	 total	
production	 of	 all	 unconventional	 wells.	 The	 ETR	
represents	an	average	for	all	wells	in	operation	during	
the	year.	In	general,	older	wells	with	low	production	
will	 have	 higher	 ETRs,	 while	 new	 wells	 with	 much	
higher	production	will	have	lower	ETRs.	
For	2014,	the	market	value	of	unconventional	natural	
gas	produced	in	Pennsylvania	is	estimated	to	be	$10.5	
trillion.	(See	Table	3.)	The	estimate	uses	these	data:	
Table	3:	Impact	Fee	Annual	Effective	Tax	Rates 
Calendar	Year	
Impact	Fee	 Unconventional	 Price	of	 Market	
Revenues	 Production	(MMcf)	 Gas	($/Mcf)1	 Value2	
2011	 $204,210	 1,072,600	 	 $3.60	 	 $3,865,200	
2012	 		202,472	 2,041,700	 			 2.14	 	 4,360,000	
2013	 		225,752	 3,103,900	 	 2.89	 	 8,963,800	
2014	 		220,400	 4,070,600	 	 2.59	 	 10,545,900	
	 Note:	Dollar	amounts	in	thousands.		MMcf	is	million	cubic	feet.	The	CY	2014	estimates	by	the	Independent	Fiscal	Of ice.	
	 Source:	Pennsylvania	Public	Utility	Commission,	Department	of	Environmental	Protection	(last	accessed	on	February	25,	
	 2015)	and	BENTEK	Energy.	
	 1	Dominion	South	spot	price	converted	to	dollars	per	Mcf	using	Pennsylvania	heat	content,	net	of	post‐production	costs.		
	 2	Does	not	include	natural	gas	liquids	(NGLs);	see	page	4	for	more	information.	
Annual	
ETR	
				5.3%	
4.6	
2.5	
2.1	
	
 Production	 of	 more	 than	 four	 trillion	 cubic	 feet.	
This	 estimate	 is	 based	 on	 statewide	 well	
production	data	published	by	DEP.	
		
 An	annual	average	price	of	$3.41	per	Mcf,	prior	to	
the	 deduction	 of	 post‐production	 costs.	 This	
estimate	is	based	on	trades	at	the	Dominion	South	
hub.	(See	page	4	for	additional	detail.)	
	
 Post‐production	 costs	 of	 $0.82	 per	 Mcf.	 This	
estimate	 includes	 costs	 for	 gathering,	 processing	
and	 transporting	 gas	 to	 markets.	 Such	 costs	 are	
deducted	 to	 approximate	 the	 value	 of	 gas	 at	 the	
wellhead,	 the	 point	 at	 which	 producers	 calculate	
their	tax	liability	in	states	that	levy	a	severance	tax.	
“Wet”	 gas	 from	 the	 southwestern	 portion	 of	 the	
state	requires	higher	processing	costs	to	separate	
natural	 gas	 liquids.	 (See	 page	 4	 for	 additional	
detail.)	 Therefore,	 the	 post‐production	 costs	
deducted	from	the	price	are	a	weighted	average	of	
approximately	$1.47	per	Mcf	for	wet	gas	and	$0.77	
per	Mcf	for	dry	gas	in	2014.4	
	
Figure	2:	Dominion	South	versus	Henry	Hub:	2011‐2014	
$0.00
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
Jan‐11 Jul‐11 Jan‐12 Jul‐12 Dec‐12 Jul‐13 Dec‐13 Jul‐14 Dec‐14
Spot	Prices	per	MMBtu
Dominion	South
Henry	Hub
Source:	U.S.	Energy	Information	Administration	and	BENTEK	Energy.	 
Independent	Fiscal	Of ice						February	2015 	 	 									 									4	
 
Table	4:	Natural	Gas	Liquids	Production	in	Pennsylvania 
Year	 Barrels	 Price	per	Barrel1	 Market	Value	
2011	 																				684,300	 $55.52	 	 $38,000	
2012	 1,786,600	 		40.44	 	 72,200	
2013	 2,955,500	 		36.92	 	 109,100	
2014	 3,982,700	 		36.51	 	 145,400	
	 Note:	Dollar	amounts	in	thousands.	
	 Source:	Pennsylvania	Department	of	Environmental	Protection	(last	accessed	on	February	25,	2015)	and	U.S.	Energy	
	 Information	Administration.	
	 1	The	price	of	NGLs	in	dollars	per	MMBtu	converted	to	dollars	per	barrel	based	on	national	averages	reported	by	the	EIA.	
The	 annual	 ETR	 for	 2011	 to	 2014	 has	 declined	 in	
each	successive	year.	(See	Table	3.)	The	main	cause	
of	that	trend	was	the	dramatic	increase	in	production	
over	 the	 time	 period.	 For	 2014,	 the	 ETR	 of	 2.1	
percent	 represents	 a	 reduction	 of	 0.4	 percentage	
points	from	the	2013	level.	Consistent	with	the	trend,	
the	 decline	 in	 the	 2014	 ETR	 is	 predominantly	
motivated	 by	 an	 increase	 in	 production	 (31.1	
percent).	 If	 prices	 had	 remained	 stable,	 then	 the	
decline	in	the	ETR	would	have	been	greater.		
R 	P 	 	N 	G 	
The	 Henry	 Hub	 spot	 price	 is	 commonly	 used	 as	 a	
proxy	 for	 the	 price	 of	 natural	 gas	 throughout	 the	
United	States.5	The	Henry	Hub	is	a	market	center	in	
Louisiana	 that	 provides	 interconnections	 between	
pipelines,	 access	 to	 processing	 plants,	 temporary	
storage	 between	 trades	 and	 an	 electronic	 trading	
platform	to	facilitate	instantaneous	price	discovery.	It	
is	 also	 a	 delivery	 point	 for	 futures	 contracts	 traded	
on	the	New	York	Mercantile	Exchange	(NYMEX).	
There	are	also	dozens	of	natural	gas	hubs	located	in	
other	 states,	 including	 several	 within	 Pennsylvania.	
The	 prices	 quoted	 at	 these	 Pennsylvania	 hubs	 have	
historically	tracked	closely	to	the	Henry	Hub,	so	that	
the	Henry	Hub	price	served	as	an	effective	proxy	for	
the	 price	 Pennsylvania	 producers	 received	 for	 their	
gas.	 However,	 beginning	 in	 summer	 2014,	 prices	 at	
the	Pennsylvania	hubs	diverged	from	the	Henry	Hub	
so	 dramatically	 that	 the	 Henry	 Hub	 price	 may	 no	
longer	 serve	 as	 an	 accurate	 proxy	 for	 the	 prices	
received	by	Pennsylvania	producers.	(See	Figure	2	on	
the	previous	page.)	This	price	divergence	was	due	to	
various	 factors	 such	 as	 strong	 regional	 production	
gains,	 insufficient	 pipeline	 capacity	 and	 temporary	
storage	constraints.	
As	a	result,	this	brief	does	not	use	the	Henry	Hub	as	a	
proxy	 for	 the	 prices	 received	 by	 Pennsylvania	
producers.	 Rather,	 this	 brief	 uses	 the	 price	 at	
Dominion	 South,	 which	 was	 the	 most	 active	 hub	 in	
the	 Marcellus	 region	 in	 terms	 of	 the	 volume	 of	 gas	
traded.	 As	 shown	 in	 Figure	 2,	 the	 Dominion	 South	
spot	price	was	significantly	lower	than	the	Henry	Hub	
for	the	last	half	of	2014.	The	price	trends	for	the	other	
Pennsylvania	hubs	mirror	this	pattern.6	
N 	G 	L 	
Certain	 unconventional	 gas	 wells	 in	 Pennsylvania	
produce	 various	 hydrocarbons	 along	 with	 “dry,”	
consumer‐grade	natural	gas	(i.e.,	methane).	The	term	
“wet”	 natural	 gas	 applies	 to	 a	 mixture	 of	
hydrocarbons	(ethane,	propane,	butane,	pentane	and	
natural	 gasoline)	 and	 non‐hydrocarbons	 (water	
vapor,	carbon	dioxide,	hydrogen	sul ide,	nitrogen	and	
helium)	existing	together	with	methane	in	a	gaseous	
state.	 The	 hydrocarbons,	 called	 natural	 gas	 liquids	
(NGLs),	are	separated	from	methane	and	are	used	by	
industries	such	as	petrochemical	manufacturing.7	
Major	 NGL	 producers	 such	 as	 Texas	 and	 Oklahoma	
levy	a	severance	tax	on	NGLs	at	the	same	rate	as	oil.	
Because	Pennsylvania	does	not	levy	 a	severance	 tax	
on	NGLs,	they	have	been	excluded	from	the	estimated	
market	value	of	production	when	calculating	ETRs.	If	
NGLs	were	included	in	the	ETR	calculation,	then	the	
ETR	 would	 decline	 by	 roughly	 0.1	 percentage	 point.	
Table	 4	 presents	 data	 on	 the	 amount	 and	 market	
value	of	NGLs	produced	from	unconventional	wells	in	
Pennsylvania	by	year.
Independent	Fiscal	Of ice						February	2015 	 	 									 									5	
 
Table	5:	Share	of	Impact	Fee	Revenues 
Year	 Wells	 Revenues	 Share	
2014		
New	 	 $67,900	 				30.8%	
Existing	 	 152,500	 69.2	
New	 	 58,608	 26.0	
Existing1	 	 167,144	 74.0	
2012	
New	 	 59,673	 29.5	
Existing	 	 142,799	 70.5	
	 Note:	Dollar	amounts	in	thousands.	The	CY	2014	estimate	
	 by	the	Independent	Fiscal	Of ice.	
	 Source:	Pennsylvania	Public	Utility	Commission.	
	 1	The	impact	fee	schedule	changed	from	CY	2012	to	CY	
2013	because	the	annual	average	price	of	natural	gas	on	
the	New	York	Mercantile	Exchange	rose	above	the	$2.99	
per	MMbtu	threshold	established	in	statute.	
2013		
2015	O 	
The	 	 outlook	 for	 the	 CY	 2015	 impact	 fee	 (to	 be	
remitted	 in	 April	 2016)	 remains	 uncertain	 due	 to	
natural	 gas	 price	 volatility	 and	 the	 implications	 for	
production.	 Three	 factors	 could	 affect	 impact	 fee	
revenues	for	CY	2015:	
	
 If	 prices	 remain	 subdued,	 it	 is	 unclear	 how	 that	
may	impact	the	number	of	new	wells	drilled.	The	
highest	impact	fee	is	levied	on	wells	in	their	first	
year	 of	 operation.	 For	 CY	 2014,	 new	 wells	 are	
projected	to	generate	$67.9	million	(30.8	percent)	
of	 impact	 fee	 revenues.	 (See	 Table	 5.)	 If	 the	
number	 of	 new	 wells	 subject	 to	 the	 impact	 fee	
declines	 by	 10	 percent,	 then	 the	 revenues	 from	
new	wells	in	CY	2015	would	fall	to	$61.1	million.	
Revenues	 from	 new	 wells	 are	 important	 to	 total	
impact	 fee	 collections	 because	 they	 generally	
offset	 the	 decline	 in	 fees	 received	 for	 existing	
wells	as	they	age.	
	
 The	 per‐well	 impact	 fee	 decreases	 each	 year	 for	
operating	 years	 two	 through	 four.	 However,	
nearly	 half	 of	 2014	 wells	 are	 in	 operating	 year	
four	 and	 will	 not	 be	 subject	 to	 a	 lower	 fee	 in	
operating	 year	 five	 (CY	 2015)	 under	 the	 current	
fee	 schedule.	 If	 the	 remaining	 wells	 that	 are	
estimated	 to	 be	 subject	 to	 the	 impact	 fee	 for	 CY	
2014	continue	to	be	subject	to	the	fee	for	CY	2015,	
then	the	revenues	from	those	wells	will	decline	by	
$38.2	 million	 based	 on	 the	 current	 fee	 schedule.	
In	practice,	some	of	those	wells	will	not	be	subject	
to	 the	 impact	 fee	 for	 CY	 2015	 because	 they	 are	
plugged	 or	 qualify	 for	 the	 stripper	 well	
exemption.		
	
 If	the	average	natural	gas	price	falls	below	$3.00	
per	 MMBtu	 on	 the	 NYMEX,	 then	 the	 per‐well	
impact	 fee	 will	 decline	 by	 roughly	 $5,000	
compared	to	2014	levels.	(Only	wells	in	operating	
year	 3	 would	 be	 unaffected.)	 The	 EIA	 forecasts	
that	 the	 Henry	 Hub	 spot	 price	 (on	 which	 the	
NYMEX	 is	 based)	 will	 average	 $3.05	 MMBtu	 for	
2015.	For	the	first	six	weeks	of	2015,	the	NYMEX	
price	ranged	from	$2.62	to	$3.32,	with	an	average	
of	$2.90.	If	the	price	of	gas	had	been	below	$3.00	
in	 2014,	 then	 the	 impact	 fee	 would	 have	
generated	approximately	$29.3	million	less.		
	
Natural	 gas	 prices	 are	 a	 key	 factor	 that	 will	 help	 to	
determine	the	number	of	new	wells	drilled.	Typically,	
regional	 prices	 are	 driven	 by	 national	 trends.	
However,	 local	 structural	 issues	 could	 also	 impact	
regional	 prices	 in	 2015.	 For	 example,	 a	 number	 of	
new	 pipelines	 are	 either	 awaiting	 approval	 or	 are	
under	construction.	New	pipelines	 may	increase	the	
regional	 price	 of	 gas	 by	 easing	 storage	 and	
transportation	 constraints,	 allowing	 more	 gas	 to	
reach	large	markets	along	the	east	coast.	It	may	also	
encourage	 producers	 to	 uncap	 wells	 that	 have	 been	
drilled,	but	do	not	currently	produce.	
	
Similar	to	price	projections,	there	is	also	uncertainty	
regarding	 production	 levels	 for	 2015.	 For	 recent	
years,	 unconventional	 Marcellus	 shale	 wells	 have	
recorded	dramatic	output	gains	due	to	technological	
improvements	 that	 have	 increased	 the	 estimated	
ultimate	 recovery	 (EUR	 or	 lifetime	 output)	 of	 new	
wells.	 It	 is	 unclear	 whether	 further	 technological	
improvements	can	continue	to	increase	production	at	
such	a	rapid	pace.	
	
The	outlook	for	the	2015	ETR	will	depend	on	(1)	the	
number	of	new	wells	drilled,	(2)	regional	prices	and	
(3)	 well	 production	 levels.	 Regional	 prices	 will	 be	
crucial	due	to	their	impact	on	market	value	and	the	
incentives	to	drill	new	wells	or	uncap	existing	wells.	
Signi icant	 production	 gains	 have	 been	 the	 main	
reason	for	the	reduction	in	the	ETR	since	2011.	The	
level	 of	 production	 will	 likely	 play	 a	 key	 role	 once	
again	 for	 the	 2015	 ETR,	 motivated	 by	 possible	
technological	 advancements	 and	 new	 well	 EURs.	 In	
general,	the	ETR	will	move	inversely	with	price	and	
production	 levels;	 therefore,	 if	 price	 or	 production	
levels	 increase	 (decline),	 then	 the	 ETR	 will	 likely	
decline	(increase).
Independent	Fiscal	Of ice						February	2015 	 	 									 									6	
 
	
	
	
Rachel	Carson	State	Of ice	Building,	2nd	Floor	
400	Market	Street	
Harrisburg,	PA	17105	
E‐mail:	contact@ifo.state.pa.us	
Website:	www.ifo.state.pa.us	
	
Staff	Acknowledgements:		
	
Mark	Stalczynski,	Kyle	Stewart	and	Neil	Bakshi	
Independent	Fiscal	Of ice	
Endnotes	
1.	 The	 annual	 average	 price	 of	 natural	 gas	 is	 the	 settled	 price	 for	 near‐month	 contracts	 on	 the	 New	 York	 Mercantile	
Exchange,	which	is	based	on	the	delivery	price	of	natural	gas	at	the	Henry	Hub	in	Louisiana.		
2.	 The	DEP	statewide	well	production	data	suggest	that	62	wells	were	plugged	in	2014,	and	those	wells	are	not	included	in	
the	well	count	for	the	impact	fee	estimate.	An	additional	17	wells	were	reported	as	active	in	the	 irst	half	of	2014,	but	
were	not	found	in	the	second	half	production	data	published	as	of	February	25,	2015.	Those	wells	are	not	included	in	the	
well	count	for	the	impact	fee	estimate.	
3.	 An	alternative	ETR	is	the	lifetime	ETR,	which	is	the	average	rate	over	all	future	years	for	a	single,	new	well;	this	measure	
is	 best	 used	 to	 quantify	 the	 prospective	 tax	 burden	 on	 new	 wells	 across	 states.	 (See	 the	 IFO’s	 previous	 publication,	
Natural	Gas	Extraction:	An	Interstate	Tax	Comparison,	for	an	analysis	using	the	lifetime	ETR.)	
4.	 Post‐production	cost	estimates	taken	from	Range	Resources	investor	presentation,	January	15,	2015.	
5.	 A	spot	price	is	a	cash	price	paid	for	“immediate	delivery,”	which	is	often	the	next	business	day.	Spot	prices	are	unique	to	
each	transaction	and	are	commonly	averaged	per	day,	month,	or	year.	Futures	trading	involves	contracts	for	delivery	at	a	
future	date,	which	are	then	traded	on	an	exchange.	This	analysis	does	not	take	into	account	futures	prices	or	privately‐
negotiated	transactions.	
6.	 The	 selection	 of	 Dominion	 South	 as	 the	 proxy	 for	 the	 price	 received	 by	 Pennsylvania	 producers	 was	 con irmed	 by	
industry	sources.	The	criterion	used	was	the	volume	of	gas	traded	at	the	hub	rather	than	the	total	 low	passing	through,	
since	it	is	the	volume	traded	that	receives	the	price.	The	hubs	considered	in	this	analysis	were	limited	to	those	located	
within	Pennsylvania,	because	it	was	more	certain	that	their	volume	traded	re lected	gas	originating	from	Pennsylvania	
wells.	These	are	the	hubs	known	as	Dominion	South,	Transco‐Leidy,	TGP	Zone	4,	and	TETCO‐M3.	When	weighted	by	the	
volume	of	gas	traded,	an	average	of	the	four	hub	prices	does	not	differ	enough	from	Dominion	South	to	signi icantly	
change	the	ETR	calculation.	
7.	 For	the	purpose	of	this	estimate,	natural	gas	liquids	(NGLs)	refers	to	all	hydrocarbons	separated	from	wet	natural	gas.	
The	DEP	records	and	reports	NGLs	as	barrels	of	condensate	in	the	production	data.	Other	publications	may	limit	the	term	
“condensates”	to	heavier	hydrocarbons	such	as	pentanes	and/or	natural	gasoline.	In	the	early	years	of	the	impact	fee,	
some	producers	reported	barrels	of	condensate	as	barrels	of	oil,	but	no	longer	do	so.	
Data	Sources	
 Statewide	well	production	data	for	natural	gas	are	from	the	Pennsylvania	Department	of	Environmental	Protection	and	
can	be	found	at	https://www.paoilandgasreporting.state.pa.us/publicreports/Modules/Welcome/Welcome.aspx.	
 Act	 13	 impact	 fee	 public	 data	 are	 from	 the	 Pennsylvania	 Public	 Utility	 Commission	 and	 can	 be	 found	 at	 	 http://
www.puc.state.pa.us/ iling_resources/issues_laws_regulations/act_13_impact_fee_.aspx.	
 Annual	energy	price	data	are	from	the	U.S.	Energy	Information	Administration	and	can	be	found	at	http://www.eia.gov/.

More Related Content

What's hot

The Carbon Nexus - Boilers, Power Plants, and Strategic Energy Management
The Carbon Nexus - Boilers, Power Plants, and Strategic Energy ManagementThe Carbon Nexus - Boilers, Power Plants, and Strategic Energy Management
The Carbon Nexus - Boilers, Power Plants, and Strategic Energy ManagementVeritatis Advisors, Inc.
 
Economic analysis related to RBMP development and implementation
Economic analysis related to RBMP development and implementationEconomic analysis related to RBMP development and implementation
Economic analysis related to RBMP development and implementationOECD Environment
 
Public Spending on Transportation and Water Infrastructure, 1956 to 2017
Public Spending on Transportation and Water Infrastructure, 1956 to 2017Public Spending on Transportation and Water Infrastructure, 1956 to 2017
Public Spending on Transportation and Water Infrastructure, 1956 to 2017Congressional Budget Office
 
What are greenhouse gas conversion factors
What are greenhouse gas conversion factorsWhat are greenhouse gas conversion factors
What are greenhouse gas conversion factorswalled ashwah
 
Fy2015 council budget_meeting_presentation_05212014 final
Fy2015 council budget_meeting_presentation_05212014 finalFy2015 council budget_meeting_presentation_05212014 final
Fy2015 council budget_meeting_presentation_05212014 finalSusie Cambria
 
Clean-Power-Plan-for-Wisconsin-Report-December-2015
Clean-Power-Plan-for-Wisconsin-Report-December-2015Clean-Power-Plan-for-Wisconsin-Report-December-2015
Clean-Power-Plan-for-Wisconsin-Report-December-2015Matthew Landi
 
Transportation update
Transportation updateTransportation update
Transportation updateEducationNC
 
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulatory Update
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulatory UpdateGreenhouse Gas Emissions Regulatory Update
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulatory UpdateAll4 Inc.
 
CCXG Oct 2019 Article 6 Accounting and environmental integrity - Seoyoung Lim
CCXG Oct 2019 Article 6 Accounting and environmental integrity - Seoyoung LimCCXG Oct 2019 Article 6 Accounting and environmental integrity - Seoyoung Lim
CCXG Oct 2019 Article 6 Accounting and environmental integrity - Seoyoung LimOECD Environment
 
David Lamb, Missouri DNR, Hazardous Waste Fee Update, Missouri Hazardous Wast...
David Lamb, Missouri DNR, Hazardous Waste Fee Update, Missouri Hazardous Wast...David Lamb, Missouri DNR, Hazardous Waste Fee Update, Missouri Hazardous Wast...
David Lamb, Missouri DNR, Hazardous Waste Fee Update, Missouri Hazardous Wast...Kevin Perry
 
002 ccet training_workshop_fy2016_to_t
002 ccet training_workshop_fy2016_to_t002 ccet training_workshop_fy2016_to_t
002 ccet training_workshop_fy2016_to_tJefzramo Omar
 
Clean Power Plan Regulatory Alert
Clean Power Plan Regulatory AlertClean Power Plan Regulatory Alert
Clean Power Plan Regulatory AlertDoug Huxley
 
GHG Mandatory Reporting Rule Overview
GHG Mandatory Reporting Rule OverviewGHG Mandatory Reporting Rule Overview
GHG Mandatory Reporting Rule OverviewFree_spirit55
 
Dept. of Interior Fact Sheet on Methane and Waste Reduction Rule
Dept. of Interior Fact Sheet on Methane and Waste Reduction RuleDept. of Interior Fact Sheet on Methane and Waste Reduction Rule
Dept. of Interior Fact Sheet on Methane and Waste Reduction RuleMarcellus Drilling News
 
Boundaries | Stephen Boyle
Boundaries | Stephen Boyle Boundaries | Stephen Boyle
Boundaries | Stephen Boyle icarb
 
130306 City Council Workshop
130306 City Council Workshop130306 City Council Workshop
130306 City Council Workshoppublicinvolvement
 
Navy Moffett Field Environmental Restoration Budget
Navy Moffett Field Environmental Restoration BudgetNavy Moffett Field Environmental Restoration Budget
Navy Moffett Field Environmental Restoration BudgetSteve Williams
 

What's hot (20)

The Carbon Nexus - Boilers, Power Plants, and Strategic Energy Management
The Carbon Nexus - Boilers, Power Plants, and Strategic Energy ManagementThe Carbon Nexus - Boilers, Power Plants, and Strategic Energy Management
The Carbon Nexus - Boilers, Power Plants, and Strategic Energy Management
 
Economic analysis related to RBMP development and implementation
Economic analysis related to RBMP development and implementationEconomic analysis related to RBMP development and implementation
Economic analysis related to RBMP development and implementation
 
Public Spending on Transportation and Water Infrastructure, 1956 to 2017
Public Spending on Transportation and Water Infrastructure, 1956 to 2017Public Spending on Transportation and Water Infrastructure, 1956 to 2017
Public Spending on Transportation and Water Infrastructure, 1956 to 2017
 
What are greenhouse gas conversion factors
What are greenhouse gas conversion factorsWhat are greenhouse gas conversion factors
What are greenhouse gas conversion factors
 
Utah Clean Power Plan Stakeholder Process
Utah Clean Power Plan Stakeholder ProcessUtah Clean Power Plan Stakeholder Process
Utah Clean Power Plan Stakeholder Process
 
Fy2015 council budget_meeting_presentation_05212014 final
Fy2015 council budget_meeting_presentation_05212014 finalFy2015 council budget_meeting_presentation_05212014 final
Fy2015 council budget_meeting_presentation_05212014 final
 
Pat rules english
Pat rules englishPat rules english
Pat rules english
 
PDD for GTCC
PDD for GTCCPDD for GTCC
PDD for GTCC
 
Clean-Power-Plan-for-Wisconsin-Report-December-2015
Clean-Power-Plan-for-Wisconsin-Report-December-2015Clean-Power-Plan-for-Wisconsin-Report-December-2015
Clean-Power-Plan-for-Wisconsin-Report-December-2015
 
Transportation update
Transportation updateTransportation update
Transportation update
 
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulatory Update
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulatory UpdateGreenhouse Gas Emissions Regulatory Update
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulatory Update
 
CCXG Oct 2019 Article 6 Accounting and environmental integrity - Seoyoung Lim
CCXG Oct 2019 Article 6 Accounting and environmental integrity - Seoyoung LimCCXG Oct 2019 Article 6 Accounting and environmental integrity - Seoyoung Lim
CCXG Oct 2019 Article 6 Accounting and environmental integrity - Seoyoung Lim
 
David Lamb, Missouri DNR, Hazardous Waste Fee Update, Missouri Hazardous Wast...
David Lamb, Missouri DNR, Hazardous Waste Fee Update, Missouri Hazardous Wast...David Lamb, Missouri DNR, Hazardous Waste Fee Update, Missouri Hazardous Wast...
David Lamb, Missouri DNR, Hazardous Waste Fee Update, Missouri Hazardous Wast...
 
002 ccet training_workshop_fy2016_to_t
002 ccet training_workshop_fy2016_to_t002 ccet training_workshop_fy2016_to_t
002 ccet training_workshop_fy2016_to_t
 
Clean Power Plan Regulatory Alert
Clean Power Plan Regulatory AlertClean Power Plan Regulatory Alert
Clean Power Plan Regulatory Alert
 
GHG Mandatory Reporting Rule Overview
GHG Mandatory Reporting Rule OverviewGHG Mandatory Reporting Rule Overview
GHG Mandatory Reporting Rule Overview
 
Dept. of Interior Fact Sheet on Methane and Waste Reduction Rule
Dept. of Interior Fact Sheet on Methane and Waste Reduction RuleDept. of Interior Fact Sheet on Methane and Waste Reduction Rule
Dept. of Interior Fact Sheet on Methane and Waste Reduction Rule
 
Boundaries | Stephen Boyle
Boundaries | Stephen Boyle Boundaries | Stephen Boyle
Boundaries | Stephen Boyle
 
130306 City Council Workshop
130306 City Council Workshop130306 City Council Workshop
130306 City Council Workshop
 
Navy Moffett Field Environmental Restoration Budget
Navy Moffett Field Environmental Restoration BudgetNavy Moffett Field Environmental Restoration Budget
Navy Moffett Field Environmental Restoration Budget
 

Viewers also liked

ACC - Shale Gas and New U.S. Chemical Industry Investment: $164 Billion and C...
ACC - Shale Gas and New U.S. Chemical Industry Investment: $164 Billion and C...ACC - Shale Gas and New U.S. Chemical Industry Investment: $164 Billion and C...
ACC - Shale Gas and New U.S. Chemical Industry Investment: $164 Billion and C...Marcellus Drilling News
 
API: The State of American Energy Report 2015
API: The State of American Energy Report 2015API: The State of American Energy Report 2015
API: The State of American Energy Report 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015
Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015
Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
EIA Drilling Productivity Report - Mar 2015
EIA Drilling Productivity Report - Mar 2015EIA Drilling Productivity Report - Mar 2015
EIA Drilling Productivity Report - Mar 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
EO100.1 Standard Technical Addendum for Shale Oil and Gas Operations
EO100.1 Standard Technical Addendum for Shale Oil and Gas OperationsEO100.1 Standard Technical Addendum for Shale Oil and Gas Operations
EO100.1 Standard Technical Addendum for Shale Oil and Gas OperationsMarcellus Drilling News
 
Pipeline Impact to Property Value and Property Insurability Report
Pipeline Impact to Property Value and Property Insurability ReportPipeline Impact to Property Value and Property Insurability Report
Pipeline Impact to Property Value and Property Insurability ReportMarcellus Drilling News
 
HBK 2016 Energy Assessment: The North American Energy Revolution
HBK 2016 Energy Assessment: The North American Energy RevolutionHBK 2016 Energy Assessment: The North American Energy Revolution
HBK 2016 Energy Assessment: The North American Energy RevolutionMarcellus Drilling News
 
WV HB 4426: Horizontal Well Unitization and Landowner Protection Act of 2016
WV HB 4426: Horizontal Well Unitization and Landowner Protection Act of 2016WV HB 4426: Horizontal Well Unitization and Landowner Protection Act of 2016
WV HB 4426: Horizontal Well Unitization and Landowner Protection Act of 2016Marcellus Drilling News
 
Research: The Impact of Marcellus Shale Development on Health and Health Care...
Research: The Impact of Marcellus Shale Development on Health and Health Care...Research: The Impact of Marcellus Shale Development on Health and Health Care...
Research: The Impact of Marcellus Shale Development on Health and Health Care...Marcellus Drilling News
 
New York State Comptroller's Audit - Pipeline Safety Oversight
New York State Comptroller's Audit - Pipeline Safety OversightNew York State Comptroller's Audit - Pipeline Safety Oversight
New York State Comptroller's Audit - Pipeline Safety OversightMarcellus Drilling News
 
Rice Energy Investor Presentation - Jan 2015
Rice Energy Investor Presentation - Jan 2015Rice Energy Investor Presentation - Jan 2015
Rice Energy Investor Presentation - Jan 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...
Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...
Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...Marcellus Drilling News
 
Antero Resources Company Overview - January 2016
Antero Resources Company Overview - January 2016Antero Resources Company Overview - January 2016
Antero Resources Company Overview - January 2016Marcellus Drilling News
 
Understanding and Negotiating Pipeline Easements
Understanding and Negotiating Pipeline EasementsUnderstanding and Negotiating Pipeline Easements
Understanding and Negotiating Pipeline EasementsMarcellus Drilling News
 
FERC Draft Environmental Impact Statement for ET Rover Pipeline
FERC Draft Environmental Impact Statement for ET Rover PipelineFERC Draft Environmental Impact Statement for ET Rover Pipeline
FERC Draft Environmental Impact Statement for ET Rover PipelineMarcellus Drilling News
 
Presentation: Induced AC Mitigation for Safety and Corrosion Control
Presentation: Induced AC Mitigation for Safety and Corrosion ControlPresentation: Induced AC Mitigation for Safety and Corrosion Control
Presentation: Induced AC Mitigation for Safety and Corrosion ControlMarcellus Drilling News
 

Viewers also liked (17)

ACC - Shale Gas and New U.S. Chemical Industry Investment: $164 Billion and C...
ACC - Shale Gas and New U.S. Chemical Industry Investment: $164 Billion and C...ACC - Shale Gas and New U.S. Chemical Industry Investment: $164 Billion and C...
ACC - Shale Gas and New U.S. Chemical Industry Investment: $164 Billion and C...
 
API: The State of American Energy Report 2015
API: The State of American Energy Report 2015API: The State of American Energy Report 2015
API: The State of American Energy Report 2015
 
Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015
Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015
Eclipse Resources Company Presentation - March 5, 2015
 
EIA Drilling Productivity Report - Mar 2015
EIA Drilling Productivity Report - Mar 2015EIA Drilling Productivity Report - Mar 2015
EIA Drilling Productivity Report - Mar 2015
 
EO100.1 Standard Technical Addendum for Shale Oil and Gas Operations
EO100.1 Standard Technical Addendum for Shale Oil and Gas OperationsEO100.1 Standard Technical Addendum for Shale Oil and Gas Operations
EO100.1 Standard Technical Addendum for Shale Oil and Gas Operations
 
FERC 2015 State of the Markets Report
FERC 2015 State of the Markets ReportFERC 2015 State of the Markets Report
FERC 2015 State of the Markets Report
 
Pipeline Impact to Property Value and Property Insurability Report
Pipeline Impact to Property Value and Property Insurability ReportPipeline Impact to Property Value and Property Insurability Report
Pipeline Impact to Property Value and Property Insurability Report
 
HBK 2016 Energy Assessment: The North American Energy Revolution
HBK 2016 Energy Assessment: The North American Energy RevolutionHBK 2016 Energy Assessment: The North American Energy Revolution
HBK 2016 Energy Assessment: The North American Energy Revolution
 
WV HB 4426: Horizontal Well Unitization and Landowner Protection Act of 2016
WV HB 4426: Horizontal Well Unitization and Landowner Protection Act of 2016WV HB 4426: Horizontal Well Unitization and Landowner Protection Act of 2016
WV HB 4426: Horizontal Well Unitization and Landowner Protection Act of 2016
 
Research: The Impact of Marcellus Shale Development on Health and Health Care...
Research: The Impact of Marcellus Shale Development on Health and Health Care...Research: The Impact of Marcellus Shale Development on Health and Health Care...
Research: The Impact of Marcellus Shale Development on Health and Health Care...
 
New York State Comptroller's Audit - Pipeline Safety Oversight
New York State Comptroller's Audit - Pipeline Safety OversightNew York State Comptroller's Audit - Pipeline Safety Oversight
New York State Comptroller's Audit - Pipeline Safety Oversight
 
Rice Energy Investor Presentation - Jan 2015
Rice Energy Investor Presentation - Jan 2015Rice Energy Investor Presentation - Jan 2015
Rice Energy Investor Presentation - Jan 2015
 
Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...
Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...
Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...
 
Antero Resources Company Overview - January 2016
Antero Resources Company Overview - January 2016Antero Resources Company Overview - January 2016
Antero Resources Company Overview - January 2016
 
Understanding and Negotiating Pipeline Easements
Understanding and Negotiating Pipeline EasementsUnderstanding and Negotiating Pipeline Easements
Understanding and Negotiating Pipeline Easements
 
FERC Draft Environmental Impact Statement for ET Rover Pipeline
FERC Draft Environmental Impact Statement for ET Rover PipelineFERC Draft Environmental Impact Statement for ET Rover Pipeline
FERC Draft Environmental Impact Statement for ET Rover Pipeline
 
Presentation: Induced AC Mitigation for Safety and Corrosion Control
Presentation: Induced AC Mitigation for Safety and Corrosion ControlPresentation: Induced AC Mitigation for Safety and Corrosion Control
Presentation: Induced AC Mitigation for Safety and Corrosion Control
 

Similar to PA Independent Fiscal Office Research Brief on Marcellus Taxation

Bay-Delta Conservation Plan: Preliminary Assessment of Financing Risk Paramet...
Bay-Delta Conservation Plan: Preliminary Assessment of Financing Risk Paramet...Bay-Delta Conservation Plan: Preliminary Assessment of Financing Risk Paramet...
Bay-Delta Conservation Plan: Preliminary Assessment of Financing Risk Paramet...San Diego County Water Authority
 
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Marcellus Drilling News
 
Company website presentation - june 2014
Company website presentation -  june 2014Company website presentation -  june 2014
Company website presentation - june 2014AnteroResources
 
Callan NDT Study 2016
Callan NDT Study 2016Callan NDT Study 2016
Callan NDT Study 2016Callan
 
The Rate Setting Process
The Rate Setting ProcessThe Rate Setting Process
The Rate Setting ProcessRishi Kumar
 
Report: Analysis of Act 13 Spending by Pennsylvania Municipalities and Counties
Report: Analysis of Act 13 Spending by Pennsylvania Municipalities and CountiesReport: Analysis of Act 13 Spending by Pennsylvania Municipalities and Counties
Report: Analysis of Act 13 Spending by Pennsylvania Municipalities and CountiesMarcellus Drilling News
 
Company website presentation august 2015 v f
Company website presentation   august 2015 v fCompany website presentation   august 2015 v f
Company website presentation august 2015 v fAnteroResources
 
Coalition Climate Policy and the National Climate Interest
Coalition Climate Policy and the National Climate InterestCoalition Climate Policy and the National Climate Interest
Coalition Climate Policy and the National Climate InterestThe Climate Institute
 
Yarra Valley Water's trade waste system
Yarra Valley Water's trade waste systemYarra Valley Water's trade waste system
Yarra Valley Water's trade waste systemNEXTDC
 
Company website presentation august 2015 v f (updated utica map)
Company website presentation   august 2015 v f (updated utica map)Company website presentation   august 2015 v f (updated utica map)
Company website presentation august 2015 v f (updated utica map)AnteroResources
 
Executive Summary of Cook County Sustainability Advisory Report, 060513
Executive Summary of Cook County Sustainability Advisory Report, 060513Executive Summary of Cook County Sustainability Advisory Report, 060513
Executive Summary of Cook County Sustainability Advisory Report, 060513cookcountyblog
 
Company Website Presentation - August 2014
Company Website Presentation - August 2014Company Website Presentation - August 2014
Company Website Presentation - August 2014AnteroResources
 
Company website presentation august 2014
Company website presentation   august 2014Company website presentation   august 2014
Company website presentation august 2014AnteroResources
 
3-Ed-Crummey-Ontario-FAO.pdf
3-Ed-Crummey-Ontario-FAO.pdf3-Ed-Crummey-Ontario-FAO.pdf
3-Ed-Crummey-Ontario-FAO.pdfOECD Governance
 
Company website presentation july 2015
Company website presentation   july 2015Company website presentation   july 2015
Company website presentation july 2015AnteroResources
 
Antero Resources Company Overview/Presentation - July 2015
Antero Resources Company Overview/Presentation - July 2015Antero Resources Company Overview/Presentation - July 2015
Antero Resources Company Overview/Presentation - July 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
Antero Resources Company Overview Presentation - August 2014
Antero Resources Company Overview Presentation - August 2014Antero Resources Company Overview Presentation - August 2014
Antero Resources Company Overview Presentation - August 2014Marcellus Drilling News
 

Similar to PA Independent Fiscal Office Research Brief on Marcellus Taxation (20)

09-08-2013 Makati Final Report
09-08-2013 Makati Final Report09-08-2013 Makati Final Report
09-08-2013 Makati Final Report
 
Bay-Delta Conservation Plan: Preliminary Assessment of Financing Risk Paramet...
Bay-Delta Conservation Plan: Preliminary Assessment of Financing Risk Paramet...Bay-Delta Conservation Plan: Preliminary Assessment of Financing Risk Paramet...
Bay-Delta Conservation Plan: Preliminary Assessment of Financing Risk Paramet...
 
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
 
Company website presentation - june 2014
Company website presentation -  june 2014Company website presentation -  june 2014
Company website presentation - june 2014
 
Callan NDT Study 2016
Callan NDT Study 2016Callan NDT Study 2016
Callan NDT Study 2016
 
The Rate Setting Process
The Rate Setting ProcessThe Rate Setting Process
The Rate Setting Process
 
Report: Analysis of Act 13 Spending by Pennsylvania Municipalities and Counties
Report: Analysis of Act 13 Spending by Pennsylvania Municipalities and CountiesReport: Analysis of Act 13 Spending by Pennsylvania Municipalities and Counties
Report: Analysis of Act 13 Spending by Pennsylvania Municipalities and Counties
 
Company website presentation august 2015 v f
Company website presentation   august 2015 v fCompany website presentation   august 2015 v f
Company website presentation august 2015 v f
 
case of the UK.pdf
case of the UK.pdfcase of the UK.pdf
case of the UK.pdf
 
Coalition Climate Policy and the National Climate Interest
Coalition Climate Policy and the National Climate InterestCoalition Climate Policy and the National Climate Interest
Coalition Climate Policy and the National Climate Interest
 
Yarra Valley Water's trade waste system
Yarra Valley Water's trade waste systemYarra Valley Water's trade waste system
Yarra Valley Water's trade waste system
 
Company website presentation august 2015 v f (updated utica map)
Company website presentation   august 2015 v f (updated utica map)Company website presentation   august 2015 v f (updated utica map)
Company website presentation august 2015 v f (updated utica map)
 
Assessment of greenhouse gas emission in 2011
Assessment of greenhouse gas emission in 2011Assessment of greenhouse gas emission in 2011
Assessment of greenhouse gas emission in 2011
 
Executive Summary of Cook County Sustainability Advisory Report, 060513
Executive Summary of Cook County Sustainability Advisory Report, 060513Executive Summary of Cook County Sustainability Advisory Report, 060513
Executive Summary of Cook County Sustainability Advisory Report, 060513
 
Company Website Presentation - August 2014
Company Website Presentation - August 2014Company Website Presentation - August 2014
Company Website Presentation - August 2014
 
Company website presentation august 2014
Company website presentation   august 2014Company website presentation   august 2014
Company website presentation august 2014
 
3-Ed-Crummey-Ontario-FAO.pdf
3-Ed-Crummey-Ontario-FAO.pdf3-Ed-Crummey-Ontario-FAO.pdf
3-Ed-Crummey-Ontario-FAO.pdf
 
Company website presentation july 2015
Company website presentation   july 2015Company website presentation   july 2015
Company website presentation july 2015
 
Antero Resources Company Overview/Presentation - July 2015
Antero Resources Company Overview/Presentation - July 2015Antero Resources Company Overview/Presentation - July 2015
Antero Resources Company Overview/Presentation - July 2015
 
Antero Resources Company Overview Presentation - August 2014
Antero Resources Company Overview Presentation - August 2014Antero Resources Company Overview Presentation - August 2014
Antero Resources Company Overview Presentation - August 2014
 

More from Marcellus Drilling News

Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongFive facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongMarcellus Drilling News
 
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Marcellus Drilling News
 
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateAccess Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateMarcellus Drilling News
 
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateRover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateMarcellus Drilling News
 
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesDOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesMarcellus Drilling News
 
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingLSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingMarcellus Drilling News
 
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Marcellus Drilling News
 
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesReport: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesMarcellus Drilling News
 
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsVelocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsMarcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...Marcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...Marcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsPA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsMarcellus Drilling News
 
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookUS EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookMarcellus Drilling News
 
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideNortheast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideMarcellus Drilling News
 
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditPA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditMarcellus Drilling News
 
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportClyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportMarcellus Drilling News
 
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectFERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectMarcellus Drilling News
 
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...Marcellus Drilling News
 

More from Marcellus Drilling News (20)

Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongFive facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
 
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
 
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateAccess Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
 
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateRover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
 
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesDOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
 
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingLSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
 
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
 
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesReport: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
 
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
 
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
 
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsVelocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
 
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
 
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
 
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsPA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
 
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookUS EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
 
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideNortheast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
 
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditPA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
 
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportClyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
 
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectFERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
 
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...
 

Recently uploaded

TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s LeadershipTDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadershipanjanibaddipudi1
 
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdh
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdhEmbed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdh
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdhbhavenpr
 
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...Pooja Nehwal
 
HARNESSING AI FOR ENHANCED MEDIA ANALYSIS A CASE STUDY ON CHATGPT AT DRONE EM...
HARNESSING AI FOR ENHANCED MEDIA ANALYSIS A CASE STUDY ON CHATGPT AT DRONE EM...HARNESSING AI FOR ENHANCED MEDIA ANALYSIS A CASE STUDY ON CHATGPT AT DRONE EM...
HARNESSING AI FOR ENHANCED MEDIA ANALYSIS A CASE STUDY ON CHATGPT AT DRONE EM...Ismail Fahmi
 
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdfHow Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdfLorenzo Lemes
 
Verified Love Spells in Little Rock, AR (310) 882-6330 Get My Ex-Lover Back
Verified Love Spells in Little Rock, AR (310) 882-6330 Get My Ex-Lover BackVerified Love Spells in Little Rock, AR (310) 882-6330 Get My Ex-Lover Back
Verified Love Spells in Little Rock, AR (310) 882-6330 Get My Ex-Lover BackPsychicRuben LoveSpells
 
₹5.5k {Cash Payment} Independent Greater Noida Call Girls In [Delhi INAYA] 🔝|...
₹5.5k {Cash Payment} Independent Greater Noida Call Girls In [Delhi INAYA] 🔝|...₹5.5k {Cash Payment} Independent Greater Noida Call Girls In [Delhi INAYA] 🔝|...
₹5.5k {Cash Payment} Independent Greater Noida Call Girls In [Delhi INAYA] 🔝|...Diya Sharma
 
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's DevelopmentNara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Developmentnarsireddynannuri1
 
28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
Pakistan PMLN Election Manifesto 2024.pdf
Pakistan PMLN Election Manifesto 2024.pdfPakistan PMLN Election Manifesto 2024.pdf
Pakistan PMLN Election Manifesto 2024.pdfFahimUddin61
 
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...AlexisTorres963861
 
2024 03 13 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL.docx
2024 03 13 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL.docx2024 03 13 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL.docx
2024 03 13 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL.docxkfjstone13
 
Vashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call Girls
Vashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call GirlsVashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call Girls
Vashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call GirlsPooja Nehwal
 
Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!
Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!
Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!Krish109503
 
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docxkfjstone13
 
Kishan Reddy Report To People (2019-24).pdf
Kishan Reddy Report To People (2019-24).pdfKishan Reddy Report To People (2019-24).pdf
Kishan Reddy Report To People (2019-24).pdfKISHAN REDDY OFFICE
 
26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceDelhi Call girls
 
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptxKAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptxjohnandrewcarlos
 
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceEnjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceDelhi Call girls
 

Recently uploaded (20)

TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s LeadershipTDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
 
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdh
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdhEmbed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdh
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdh
 
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
 
HARNESSING AI FOR ENHANCED MEDIA ANALYSIS A CASE STUDY ON CHATGPT AT DRONE EM...
HARNESSING AI FOR ENHANCED MEDIA ANALYSIS A CASE STUDY ON CHATGPT AT DRONE EM...HARNESSING AI FOR ENHANCED MEDIA ANALYSIS A CASE STUDY ON CHATGPT AT DRONE EM...
HARNESSING AI FOR ENHANCED MEDIA ANALYSIS A CASE STUDY ON CHATGPT AT DRONE EM...
 
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdfHow Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
 
Verified Love Spells in Little Rock, AR (310) 882-6330 Get My Ex-Lover Back
Verified Love Spells in Little Rock, AR (310) 882-6330 Get My Ex-Lover BackVerified Love Spells in Little Rock, AR (310) 882-6330 Get My Ex-Lover Back
Verified Love Spells in Little Rock, AR (310) 882-6330 Get My Ex-Lover Back
 
₹5.5k {Cash Payment} Independent Greater Noida Call Girls In [Delhi INAYA] 🔝|...
₹5.5k {Cash Payment} Independent Greater Noida Call Girls In [Delhi INAYA] 🔝|...₹5.5k {Cash Payment} Independent Greater Noida Call Girls In [Delhi INAYA] 🔝|...
₹5.5k {Cash Payment} Independent Greater Noida Call Girls In [Delhi INAYA] 🔝|...
 
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's DevelopmentNara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
 
28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Pakistan PMLN Election Manifesto 2024.pdf
Pakistan PMLN Election Manifesto 2024.pdfPakistan PMLN Election Manifesto 2024.pdf
Pakistan PMLN Election Manifesto 2024.pdf
 
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
 
2024 03 13 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL.docx
2024 03 13 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL.docx2024 03 13 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL.docx
2024 03 13 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL.docx
 
Vashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call Girls
Vashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call GirlsVashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call Girls
Vashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call Girls
 
Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!
Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!
Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!
 
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx
 
Kishan Reddy Report To People (2019-24).pdf
Kishan Reddy Report To People (2019-24).pdfKishan Reddy Report To People (2019-24).pdf
Kishan Reddy Report To People (2019-24).pdf
 
26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptxKAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
 
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceEnjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 

PA Independent Fiscal Office Research Brief on Marcellus Taxation

  • 1. Independent Fiscal Of ice February 2015 1 Research Brief 2015‐2 February 2015  Impact Fee Update Since 2012, Pennsylvania has imposed an annual impact fee on unconventional (e.g., shale) natural gas wells that were drilled or operating in the previous calendar year. This research brief estimates the calendar year 2014 impact fee revenues (to be remitted in April 2015) using data from the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the Public Utility Commission (PUC). The research brief also translates the impact fee into an annual average effective tax rate (ETR) based on recent natural gas price and production data. The ETR is a metric that quanti ies the implicit tax burden imposed by the impact fee in a given year. From calendar year (CY) 2011 to CY 2013, the impact fee generated approximately $632 million in revenues, which were distributed to local governments and state agencies to offset the impact from unconventional natural gas extraction. The proceeds are used to provide for infrastructure, emergency services, environmental initiatives and various other programs. (See Table 1.) By statute, the distributions to Commonwealth agencies occur irst and remain constant from year to year. The balance of funds are then distributed to local governments, the Marcellus Legacy Fund, and the Housing and Rehabilitation Enhancement Fund (HARE Fund). Counties and municipalities receive funds based on the prevalence of drilling activity in each jurisdiction or their proximity to jurisdictions in which drilling activity takes place. I Table 1: Impact Fee Revenues and Distributions 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Revenues $204,210 $202,472 $225,752 $220,400 Counties, Municipalities and HARE Fund1 108,726 107,683 123,151 121,350 Marcellus Legacy Fund 82,484 79,289 84,601 81,000 Commonwealth Agencies 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 County and State Conservation Districts/Commission2 2,500 5,000 7,500 7,550 Note: Dollar amounts in thousands. The CY 2014 estimates by the Independent Fiscal Of ice. Source: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. 1 Housing Affordability and Rehabilitation Enhancement Fund. 2 The distribution to the County Conservation Districts is set by statute to increase by increments of $2.5 million from 2011 to 2013, and thereafter to increase by the CPI‐U as published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2014 I F E The annual impact fee for an unconventional natural gas well is determined according to a bracketed schedule based on the number of years since a well became subject to the impact fee (operating year), the type of well (horizontal or vertical) and, to a limited extent, the average annual price of natural gas.1 Table 2 on the following page displays the applicable fee schedule for CY 2011 to CY 2014. For 2014, estimates of the number of wells by operating year and type are based on an analysis of statewide well production data published by the DEP and historical impact fee payment data provided by the PUC. Two primary factors inform the CY 2014 impact fee estimate:  A well’s operating year is determined by its spud date, a point in time that represents the onset of drilling activity. Thus, a well spud in 2014 is in its irst operating year for the purpose of the CY 2014 estimate.  Wells that produce less than 90 Mcf (thousand cubic feet) of natural gas per day on average are known as “stripper wells.” By statute, all horizontal wells must remit the impact fee for three years, regardless of production levels. Following that three‐year period, horizontal wells that qualify as stripper wells are exempt from the impact fee. Vertical wells that produce gas at the stripper well level are exempt from the fee, regardless of operating year.
  • 2. Independent Fiscal Of ice February 2015 2   Based on the analysis, the following well counts were used to inform the CY 2014 impact fee estimate:2  1,360 new wells (in operating year 1);  5,909 existing wells (1,199 in operating year 2, 1,282 in year 3 and 3,428 in year 4); and  1,093 stripper wells that are not subject to the impact fee (not shown in Figure 1). This includes horizontal stripper wells in their fourth operating year and vertical stripper wells. Without the exemption for horizontal stripper wells, the number of wells in their fourth operating year in 2014 would be considerably higher than the 3,428 wells cited in the above bullet. The CY 2014 impact fee estimate is $220.4 million, which is based on the published fee schedule and the estimated well counts listed in Figure 1. The CY 2014 impact fee differs from previous years in two respects. First, 2014 was the first year that the number of unconventional wells spud in Pennsylvania exceeded the number spud in the prior year. Due to that outcome, the statute requires the PUC to apply a regional inflation adjustment to the fee schedule. The inflation adjustment will increase collections by an estimated $1.2 million. Second, 2014 was the first year in which horizontal stripper wells were eligible for an exemption after paying the fee for three years (i.e., in their fourth operating year). The horizontal stripper well exemption will decrease collections by an estimated $8.7 million. Table 2: Impact Fee Schedule for Horizontal Wells1  Operating Year CY 2011 CY 20122 CY 2013 CY 20143 1 $50,000 $45,000 $50,000 $50,300 2 ‐ 35,000 40,000 40,200 3 ‐ ‐ 30,000 30,200 4 ‐ ‐ ‐ 20,100 Source: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. 1 Vertical wells are subject to 20 percent of the fee levied on horizontal wells. 2 The fees for CY 2012 are lower than the fees for other years because the annual average price of natural gas on the New York Mercantile Exchange ($2.78 per MMbtu) dropped below the $3.00 per MMbtu threshold established in statute. 3 Includes a regional in lationary adjustment of 0.6% as reported by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. Source: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. The CY 2014 estimate by the Independent Fiscal Of ice. 1 New wells are wells spud in the corresponding year that remit the impact fee. Existing wells are wells spud in prior years that remit the impact fee. 2 The irst year of the impact fee was 2011. All wells in that year were classi ied as new, regardless of spud date. Figure 1: New and Existing Wells1 (1,500) 500 2,500 4,500 6,500 New Existing New Existing New Existing New 2014201320122011 1,188 5,089 1,309 4,015 4,022 232 52 215 311 58 Horizontal Vertical 5,738 1,347 13 171 2  
  • 3. Independent Fiscal Of ice February 2015 3   E T R Because the impact fee does not directly respond to the price of natural gas or the volume of production, it does not provide a measure of tax burden relative to natural gas sales. For that purpose, this research brief computes an annual average ETR.3 The ETR is equal to the annual impact fee revenues divided by the total market value of unconventional natural gas production. The market value is equal to the product of (1) the annual average regional price of natural gas net of post‐production costs and (2) the total production of all unconventional wells. The ETR represents an average for all wells in operation during the year. In general, older wells with low production will have higher ETRs, while new wells with much higher production will have lower ETRs. For 2014, the market value of unconventional natural gas produced in Pennsylvania is estimated to be $10.5 trillion. (See Table 3.) The estimate uses these data: Table 3: Impact Fee Annual Effective Tax Rates  Calendar Year Impact Fee Unconventional Price of Market Revenues Production (MMcf) Gas ($/Mcf)1 Value2 2011 $204,210 1,072,600 $3.60 $3,865,200 2012 202,472 2,041,700 2.14 4,360,000 2013 225,752 3,103,900 2.89 8,963,800 2014 220,400 4,070,600 2.59 10,545,900 Note: Dollar amounts in thousands. MMcf is million cubic feet. The CY 2014 estimates by the Independent Fiscal Of ice. Source: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Department of Environmental Protection (last accessed on February 25, 2015) and BENTEK Energy. 1 Dominion South spot price converted to dollars per Mcf using Pennsylvania heat content, net of post‐production costs. 2 Does not include natural gas liquids (NGLs); see page 4 for more information. Annual ETR 5.3% 4.6 2.5 2.1  Production of more than four trillion cubic feet. This estimate is based on statewide well production data published by DEP.  An annual average price of $3.41 per Mcf, prior to the deduction of post‐production costs. This estimate is based on trades at the Dominion South hub. (See page 4 for additional detail.)  Post‐production costs of $0.82 per Mcf. This estimate includes costs for gathering, processing and transporting gas to markets. Such costs are deducted to approximate the value of gas at the wellhead, the point at which producers calculate their tax liability in states that levy a severance tax. “Wet” gas from the southwestern portion of the state requires higher processing costs to separate natural gas liquids. (See page 4 for additional detail.) Therefore, the post‐production costs deducted from the price are a weighted average of approximately $1.47 per Mcf for wet gas and $0.77 per Mcf for dry gas in 2014.4 Figure 2: Dominion South versus Henry Hub: 2011‐2014 $0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 Jan‐11 Jul‐11 Jan‐12 Jul‐12 Dec‐12 Jul‐13 Dec‐13 Jul‐14 Dec‐14 Spot Prices per MMBtu Dominion South Henry Hub Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration and BENTEK Energy.  
  • 4. Independent Fiscal Of ice February 2015 4   Table 4: Natural Gas Liquids Production in Pennsylvania  Year Barrels Price per Barrel1 Market Value 2011 684,300 $55.52 $38,000 2012 1,786,600 40.44 72,200 2013 2,955,500 36.92 109,100 2014 3,982,700 36.51 145,400 Note: Dollar amounts in thousands. Source: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (last accessed on February 25, 2015) and U.S. Energy Information Administration. 1 The price of NGLs in dollars per MMBtu converted to dollars per barrel based on national averages reported by the EIA. The annual ETR for 2011 to 2014 has declined in each successive year. (See Table 3.) The main cause of that trend was the dramatic increase in production over the time period. For 2014, the ETR of 2.1 percent represents a reduction of 0.4 percentage points from the 2013 level. Consistent with the trend, the decline in the 2014 ETR is predominantly motivated by an increase in production (31.1 percent). If prices had remained stable, then the decline in the ETR would have been greater. R P N G The Henry Hub spot price is commonly used as a proxy for the price of natural gas throughout the United States.5 The Henry Hub is a market center in Louisiana that provides interconnections between pipelines, access to processing plants, temporary storage between trades and an electronic trading platform to facilitate instantaneous price discovery. It is also a delivery point for futures contracts traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX). There are also dozens of natural gas hubs located in other states, including several within Pennsylvania. The prices quoted at these Pennsylvania hubs have historically tracked closely to the Henry Hub, so that the Henry Hub price served as an effective proxy for the price Pennsylvania producers received for their gas. However, beginning in summer 2014, prices at the Pennsylvania hubs diverged from the Henry Hub so dramatically that the Henry Hub price may no longer serve as an accurate proxy for the prices received by Pennsylvania producers. (See Figure 2 on the previous page.) This price divergence was due to various factors such as strong regional production gains, insufficient pipeline capacity and temporary storage constraints. As a result, this brief does not use the Henry Hub as a proxy for the prices received by Pennsylvania producers. Rather, this brief uses the price at Dominion South, which was the most active hub in the Marcellus region in terms of the volume of gas traded. As shown in Figure 2, the Dominion South spot price was significantly lower than the Henry Hub for the last half of 2014. The price trends for the other Pennsylvania hubs mirror this pattern.6 N G L Certain unconventional gas wells in Pennsylvania produce various hydrocarbons along with “dry,” consumer‐grade natural gas (i.e., methane). The term “wet” natural gas applies to a mixture of hydrocarbons (ethane, propane, butane, pentane and natural gasoline) and non‐hydrocarbons (water vapor, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sul ide, nitrogen and helium) existing together with methane in a gaseous state. The hydrocarbons, called natural gas liquids (NGLs), are separated from methane and are used by industries such as petrochemical manufacturing.7 Major NGL producers such as Texas and Oklahoma levy a severance tax on NGLs at the same rate as oil. Because Pennsylvania does not levy a severance tax on NGLs, they have been excluded from the estimated market value of production when calculating ETRs. If NGLs were included in the ETR calculation, then the ETR would decline by roughly 0.1 percentage point. Table 4 presents data on the amount and market value of NGLs produced from unconventional wells in Pennsylvania by year.
  • 5. Independent Fiscal Of ice February 2015 5   Table 5: Share of Impact Fee Revenues  Year Wells Revenues Share 2014 New $67,900 30.8% Existing 152,500 69.2 New 58,608 26.0 Existing1 167,144 74.0 2012 New 59,673 29.5 Existing 142,799 70.5 Note: Dollar amounts in thousands. The CY 2014 estimate by the Independent Fiscal Of ice. Source: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. 1 The impact fee schedule changed from CY 2012 to CY 2013 because the annual average price of natural gas on the New York Mercantile Exchange rose above the $2.99 per MMbtu threshold established in statute. 2013 2015 O The outlook for the CY 2015 impact fee (to be remitted in April 2016) remains uncertain due to natural gas price volatility and the implications for production. Three factors could affect impact fee revenues for CY 2015:  If prices remain subdued, it is unclear how that may impact the number of new wells drilled. The highest impact fee is levied on wells in their first year of operation. For CY 2014, new wells are projected to generate $67.9 million (30.8 percent) of impact fee revenues. (See Table 5.) If the number of new wells subject to the impact fee declines by 10 percent, then the revenues from new wells in CY 2015 would fall to $61.1 million. Revenues from new wells are important to total impact fee collections because they generally offset the decline in fees received for existing wells as they age.  The per‐well impact fee decreases each year for operating years two through four. However, nearly half of 2014 wells are in operating year four and will not be subject to a lower fee in operating year five (CY 2015) under the current fee schedule. If the remaining wells that are estimated to be subject to the impact fee for CY 2014 continue to be subject to the fee for CY 2015, then the revenues from those wells will decline by $38.2 million based on the current fee schedule. In practice, some of those wells will not be subject to the impact fee for CY 2015 because they are plugged or qualify for the stripper well exemption.  If the average natural gas price falls below $3.00 per MMBtu on the NYMEX, then the per‐well impact fee will decline by roughly $5,000 compared to 2014 levels. (Only wells in operating year 3 would be unaffected.) The EIA forecasts that the Henry Hub spot price (on which the NYMEX is based) will average $3.05 MMBtu for 2015. For the first six weeks of 2015, the NYMEX price ranged from $2.62 to $3.32, with an average of $2.90. If the price of gas had been below $3.00 in 2014, then the impact fee would have generated approximately $29.3 million less. Natural gas prices are a key factor that will help to determine the number of new wells drilled. Typically, regional prices are driven by national trends. However, local structural issues could also impact regional prices in 2015. For example, a number of new pipelines are either awaiting approval or are under construction. New pipelines may increase the regional price of gas by easing storage and transportation constraints, allowing more gas to reach large markets along the east coast. It may also encourage producers to uncap wells that have been drilled, but do not currently produce. Similar to price projections, there is also uncertainty regarding production levels for 2015. For recent years, unconventional Marcellus shale wells have recorded dramatic output gains due to technological improvements that have increased the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR or lifetime output) of new wells. It is unclear whether further technological improvements can continue to increase production at such a rapid pace. The outlook for the 2015 ETR will depend on (1) the number of new wells drilled, (2) regional prices and (3) well production levels. Regional prices will be crucial due to their impact on market value and the incentives to drill new wells or uncap existing wells. Signi icant production gains have been the main reason for the reduction in the ETR since 2011. The level of production will likely play a key role once again for the 2015 ETR, motivated by possible technological advancements and new well EURs. In general, the ETR will move inversely with price and production levels; therefore, if price or production levels increase (decline), then the ETR will likely decline (increase).
  • 6. Independent Fiscal Of ice February 2015 6   Rachel Carson State Of ice Building, 2nd Floor 400 Market Street Harrisburg, PA 17105 E‐mail: contact@ifo.state.pa.us Website: www.ifo.state.pa.us Staff Acknowledgements: Mark Stalczynski, Kyle Stewart and Neil Bakshi Independent Fiscal Of ice Endnotes 1. The annual average price of natural gas is the settled price for near‐month contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange, which is based on the delivery price of natural gas at the Henry Hub in Louisiana. 2. The DEP statewide well production data suggest that 62 wells were plugged in 2014, and those wells are not included in the well count for the impact fee estimate. An additional 17 wells were reported as active in the irst half of 2014, but were not found in the second half production data published as of February 25, 2015. Those wells are not included in the well count for the impact fee estimate. 3. An alternative ETR is the lifetime ETR, which is the average rate over all future years for a single, new well; this measure is best used to quantify the prospective tax burden on new wells across states. (See the IFO’s previous publication, Natural Gas Extraction: An Interstate Tax Comparison, for an analysis using the lifetime ETR.) 4. Post‐production cost estimates taken from Range Resources investor presentation, January 15, 2015. 5. A spot price is a cash price paid for “immediate delivery,” which is often the next business day. Spot prices are unique to each transaction and are commonly averaged per day, month, or year. Futures trading involves contracts for delivery at a future date, which are then traded on an exchange. This analysis does not take into account futures prices or privately‐ negotiated transactions. 6. The selection of Dominion South as the proxy for the price received by Pennsylvania producers was con irmed by industry sources. The criterion used was the volume of gas traded at the hub rather than the total low passing through, since it is the volume traded that receives the price. The hubs considered in this analysis were limited to those located within Pennsylvania, because it was more certain that their volume traded re lected gas originating from Pennsylvania wells. These are the hubs known as Dominion South, Transco‐Leidy, TGP Zone 4, and TETCO‐M3. When weighted by the volume of gas traded, an average of the four hub prices does not differ enough from Dominion South to signi icantly change the ETR calculation. 7. For the purpose of this estimate, natural gas liquids (NGLs) refers to all hydrocarbons separated from wet natural gas. The DEP records and reports NGLs as barrels of condensate in the production data. Other publications may limit the term “condensates” to heavier hydrocarbons such as pentanes and/or natural gasoline. In the early years of the impact fee, some producers reported barrels of condensate as barrels of oil, but no longer do so. Data Sources  Statewide well production data for natural gas are from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and can be found at https://www.paoilandgasreporting.state.pa.us/publicreports/Modules/Welcome/Welcome.aspx.  Act 13 impact fee public data are from the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and can be found at http:// www.puc.state.pa.us/ iling_resources/issues_laws_regulations/act_13_impact_fee_.aspx.  Annual energy price data are from the U.S. Energy Information Administration and can be found at http://www.eia.gov/.