SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  36
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
July 2015 Update
NYSE: SWN
1
Southwestern Energy Company
• General Information •
Southwestern Energy Company is an independent natural gas company whose wholly-owned subsidiaries
are engaged in natural gas and oil exploration and production and natural gas gathering and marketing.
• Investor Contacts •
Steve Mueller
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Phone: (832) 796-4700 Fax: (832) 796-4820
Craig Owen
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Phone: (832) 796-2808 Fax: (832) 796-4820
• Market Data as of June 30, 2015 •
Institutional Ownership – 92.2%
Management and Board Ownership – 0.6%
Shares of Common Stock Outstanding – 384,600,000
Market Capitalization – $8,742,000,000
NYSE: SWN
52-Week Price Range – $21.63 (3/10/15) – $44.99 (7/1/14)
Investment Grade Credit Rating – Moody’s (Baa3); S&P (BBB-); Fitch (BBB-)
Michael Hancock
Director, Investor Relations
Phone: (832) 796-7367 Fax: (832) 796-4820
craig_owen@swn.com michael_hancock@swn.com
2
All statements, other than historical facts and financial information, may be deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements that address
activities, outcomes and other matters that should or may occur in the future, including, without limitation, statements regarding the financial
position, business strategy, production and reserve growth and other plans and objectives for the company’s future operations, are forward-looking
statements. Although the company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions,
such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking
statements. The company has no obligation and makes no undertaking to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, other than to the
extent set forth below. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. They are subject to known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may affect the company’s operations, markets, products, services and prices and cause its actual results,
performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-
looking statements. In addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with forward-looking statements, risks,
uncertainties and factors that could cause the company’s actual results to differ materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statement
include, but are not limited to: the timing and extent of changes in market conditions and prices for natural gas and oil (including regional basis
differentials); the company’s ability to fund the company’s planned capital investments; the company’s ability to transport its production to the most
favorable markets or at all; the timing and extent of the company’s success in discovering, developing, producing and estimating reserves; the
economic viability of, and the company’s success in drilling, the company’s large acreage position in various areas and, in particular, the Fayetteville
Shale, Northeast Appalachia and Southwest Appalachia as well as relative to other productive shale gas plays; the company’s ability to realize the
expected benefits from recent acquisitions; the impact of title and environmental defects and other matters on the value of the properties acquired in
the company’s recent acquisitions and any other future acquisitions; difficulties in integrating the company’s operations as a result of any significant
acquisitions; the impact of government regulation, including any legislation relating to hydraulic fracturing, the climate or over-the-counter derivatives;
the costs and availability of oil field personnel services and drilling supplies, raw materials and equipment, including pressure pumping equipment
and crews; the company’s ability to determine the most effective and economic fracture stimulation; the company’s future property acquisition or
divestiture activities; the effects of weather; increased competition and regulation; the financial impact of accounting regulations and critical
accounting policies; the comparative cost of alternative fuels; the different risks and uncertainties associated with proposed activities in Canada;
conditions in capital markets, changes in interest rates and the ability of the company’s lenders to provide it with funds as agreed; credit risk relating
to the risk of loss as a result of non-performance by the company’s counterparties; and any other factors listed in the reports the company has filed
and may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). For additional information with respect to certain of these and other factors, see
the reports filed by the company with the SEC. The company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Forward-Looking Statements
The contents of this presentation are current as of July 1, 2015.
3
Southwestern Energy Consistently Creates Value
• Strategy built on the formula
– The Right People doing the Right Things, wisely investing the cash flow from the underlying Assets will create Value +
• 4th largest producer of natural gas in the U.S. Lower 48 for 1Q 2015
– 2014 production of 768 Bcfe
– 10.7 Tcfe of proved reserves at December 2014
• World-class assets
– High degree of operational control and flexibility
– Access to all major markets
• Demonstrated capital discipline
– Average return on equity(1) of 15% over the past three years
– Target $1.30 of present value cash flow, discounted at 10%, for each dollar invested (defined as 1.3 PVI)
– Commitment to maintain investment grade credit profile
• Differentiating focus on low-cost structure with proven track record
– From 2009 – 2014:
• 21% compound annual production growth and per share growth
• 24% compound annual reserve growth and per share growth
– Cash operating costs(2) of $1.32 per Mcfe in 2014
(1) Excludes impact of full cost ceiling test impairments
(2) Cash operating costs for 2014 include lease operating expenses ($0.91/Mcfe), general and administrative expenses ($0.24/Mcfe), taxes other than income taxes ($0.11/Mcfe) and net
interest expense ($0.06/Mcfe)
Sand Wash Basin – Approx. 376,000 net acres
Brown Dense – Approx. 304,000 net acres
New Brunswick – Approx. 2.5 million net acres
Other New Ventures – Approx. 982,000 net acres
D
A
FAYETTEVILLE SHALE
2014 Reserves: 5,069 Bcf (47%)
2014 Production: 494 Bcf (64%)
Net Acres: 888,161 (12/31/14)
B
SOUTHWEST APPALACHIA
2014 Reserves: 2,297 Bcfe (22%)
Dec 2014 Production: 370 Mmcfe/d
Net Acres: 443,376 (Jan 2015)(2)
C
NORTHEAST APPALACHIA
2014 Reserves: 3,192 Bcf (30%)
2014 Production: 254 Bcf (33%)
Net Acres: 312,773 (Jan 2015)(1)
RESERVES & PRODUCTION
2014 Reserves: 10,747 Bcfe
2014 Production: 768 Bcfe
2015 Estimated Production: 940-955 Bcfe
4
North American Areas of Operation
D
C
D
D
NEW VENTURES
LA
TX
CO
OK AR
WV
PA
NB
(!) Includes approximately 46,700 net acres that were acquired as part of transaction closed in January 2015
(2) Includes approximately 30,000 net acres that were acquired as part of transaction closed in January 2015
A
EXPLORATION
B
Forward-Looking Statement
$675
$1,362 $1,383
$1,602
$1,774
$1,638
$1,997
$2,320
07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Adjusted EBITDA
($MM)
2.70
1.70
0.91
1.24
1.34
2.08
0.62
1.29
07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
F&D Cost ($/Mcfe)
113
195
300
405
500
565
657
768
07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Production
(Bcfe)
1.5
2.2
3.7
4.9
5.9
4.0
7.0
10.7
07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Proved Reserves
(Tcfe)
Proven Track Record
5
(1) Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. See explanation and reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA on page 35.
(2) Average realized gas prices ($/Mcf)
(3) Excludes reserve revisions
(4) Excludes the impact from the West Virginia and southwest Pennsylvania acquisition closed in December 2014.
$6.80 $7.52 $5.35 $4.62 $4.18 $3.44 $3.65Price(2) $3.72
(1)
(3)
Forward-Looking Statement
(4)
2,657
3,619
4,100
4,528
4,836
4,819
5,356
5,440
07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Lateral
Length
Continuous Improvement
6
17.5
13.6
11.7
10.9
7.9
6.7
6.2
6.8
07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Days to Drill
$2.9
$3.0
$2.9
$2.8$2.8
$2.5
$2.4
$2.6
07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Well Cost
($ in millions)
$2.39
$1.44
$0.80
$1.04
$1.11
$2.53
$0.45
$1.14
07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
F&D Cost
($ per Mcf)
716
1,545
3,117
4,345
5,104
2,988
4,795
5,069
07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Reserves
(in Bcf)
54
135
244
350
437
486 486 494
07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Production
(in Bcf)
Notes: Finding and development costs exclude revisions and capital investments in our sand facility, drilling rig related and ancillary equipment.
-61% +608%+815%-11%+105% -52%
25.6
16.5
13.2 12.9
10.2
10 11 12 13 14
Days to Drill
3,805
4,223
4,070
4,982
4,752
10 11 12 13 14
Lateral
Length
$5.9
$7.0
$6.2
$7.0
$6.1
10 11 12 13 14
Well Cost
($ in millions)
1
23
54
151
254
10 11 12 13 14
Production
(in Bcf)
-60% +25%
$2.98
$1.38
$1.03
$0.73
$0.85
10 11 12 13 14
F&D Cost
($ per Mcf)
38
342
816
1,963
3,192
10 11 12 13 14
Reserves
(in Bcf)
Northeast Appalachia
Fayetteville Shale
Enhanced Position in Core Areas of Premier Play
Forward-Looking Statement7
SWN acreage shown
in yellow
Bcf/Section
50 Bcf
100 Bcf
150 Bcf
200 Bcf
250 Bcf
300 Bcf
1Q15 Appalachia Production vs. Peers(1) Unconventional Appalachia Net Acres vs. Peers(1)
(1) Source: Company presentations and filings
(2) Includes impact from STO and WPX property acquisitions closed in January 2015
(in thousands)(Mmcfe/d)
• SWN held approximately 413,000 net
acres in West Virginia and southwest
Pennsylvania as of December 31, 2014
• In January 2015, additional transaction
for approximately 30,000 net acres closed
• Plan to participate in 50 to 55 wells in
2015, primarily in the Marcellus wet gas
window
(2)(2)
ID Operator Well Name
IP
(Mmcfe/d)
IP30
(Mmcfe/d)
Lateral
Length
(feet)
% Liquids
at IP30
MARCELLUS
1 SWN Melvin Kahle 8H 7.9 4,507 58%
2 EQT Pierce Pad (8 wells) 15.4 5,814 0%
3 SWN Gladys Briggs 8H 13.8 5,142 40%
4 SWN Esther Clark 3H 5.2 6,556 0%
5 NBL SHR1 Pad (6 wells) 10.1 8,741 19%
6 AR Mash Unit (2 wells) 15.7 9,835 28%
7 AR Ruth Unit 1H 19.2 6,514 14%
8 SWN Edwin Bunner 8H 4.2 5,600 0%
9 CNX AUD3 6.1 8,691 0%
UTICA
1 SWN Hubbard 3H 11.1 8.1 3,550 0%
2 HES NAC 3H-3 11.0 5,336 0%
3 RRC Sportsman's Club 11H 59.0 5,420 0%
4 RICE Bigfoot 9H 41.7 14.0 6,957 0%
5 CVX Conner 6H 25.0 6,451 0%
6 GST Simms 4-5H 29.4 19.8 4,447 0%
7 SWN Messenger 3H 25.0 20.0 5,889 0%
8 SGY Pribble 6H 30.0 3,605 0%
9 MHR S. Winland #1300H 46.5 4,289 0%
UPPER DEVONIAN
1 CNX NV39F 3.0 2.9 4,889 0%
2 EQT 7 Well Avg. 8.2 5,964 0%
3 EQT 11 Well Avg. 5.0 4,396 18%
Well-Positioned in Rapidly Developing Play
8
2
4
5
6
7
9
1
3
4
8
1
2
3
Marcellus
Utica
Upper Devonian
6
7
9
2
5
All SWN operated rates exclude shut in days
Acquired acreage is low-risk opportunity
in the heart of world-class play
Source: Public data and company presentations
8
3
1
9
Northeast Appalachia
Forward-Looking Statement
• We hold approximately 312,000 net acres in Northeast Pennsylvania.
• Gross operated production was 1,148 MMcf/d from 348 operated horizontal wells as
of March 31, 2015.
• We plan to drill 88 to 92 operated horizontal wells in 2015.
Fayetteville Shale Focus Area
10 Forward-Looking Statement
• SWN holds approx. 888,000 net acres in the Fayetteville Shale play.
• SWN discovered the Fayetteville Shale and has first mover advantage – average acreage cost of
$320 per acre with a 15% royalty and average working interest of 74%.
• We plan to drill approximately 225 to 235 operated horizontal wells in 2015.
Notes: Data as of March 31, 2015. Rates are AOGC Form 13 and Form 3 test rates.
Capital Investments
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Exploration Drilling Development Drilling Leasehold & Seismic
Property Acquisitions Midstream Services Drilling Rigs
Corporate & Other Capital Expense & Other E&P
$2,120 $2,207
$2,081
$2,235
$2,440
BY SPENDING TYPE in $Millions
E&P capital program heavily weighted to low-risk development drilling in 2015.
Plan to invest approximately $700 million in Northeast Appalachia $645 million in the
Fayetteville Shale and $520 million in Southwest Appalachia in 2015 (including Midstream).
Fayetteville
30%
NE
Appalachia
37%
SW
Appalachia
27%
Exploration
and Other
6%
E&P
BY DIVISION
2015
44%
33%
23%
2014
$2,015
(1)
(1) Excludes acquisition capital for transactions announced in 4Q 201411
(1)
Forward-Looking Statement
12
(1) Includes amounts associated with assets divested in 2015.
(2) Adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA exclude unrealized gains and losses on derivative contracts. All are non-GAAP financial measures. See explanation and reconciliation on pages 34 and 35.
(3) Net cash flow is net cash flow before changes in operating assets and liabilities and excludes current taxes associated with any future asset sales. Net cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure.
See explanation and reconciliation on page 33.
(4) Excludes acquisition capital for transactions announced in 4Q 2014.
(5) The impact of preferred dividends is included in Adjusted EBITDA and excluded from Net Cash Flow.
Our Path Forward
Forward-Looking Statement
 Adj. Net Income(2)
2014
Actual
 Net Cash Flow(3)(5)
 CapEx(4)
$4.41 Gas
$92.91 Oil
 Adj. EBITDA(2)(5)
 Debt %
NYMEX Price Assumption
2015 Guidance
$801 MM
$2,270 MM
$2,440 MM
$2,320 MM
39%
$215-$235 MM
$1,760-$1,780 MM
$2,015 MM
$1,645-$1,665 MM
39%-41%
$140-$160 MM
$1,640-$1,660 MM
$2,015 MM
$1,525-$1,545 MM
40%-42%
$240-$260 MM
$1,800-$1,820 MM
$2,015 MM
$1,680-$1,700 MM
39%-41%
$3.25 Gas
$50.00 Oil
$3.00 Gas
$60.00 Oil
$3.25 Gas
$60.00 Oil
(1)
13
• Invest in the Highest PVI Projects
• Maintain Strong Balance Sheet
• Deliver the Numbers
• Curiosity to Learning to Innovation to
The Road to
14
Appendix
About Southwestern
Source: Public company reports, Southwestern Energy
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
XOM
CHK
APC
SWN
SWN
COG
SWN
DVN
COP
BP
SWN
EQT
SWN
AR
CVX
BHP
SWN
EOG
RRC
ECA
UPL
SWN
CNX
WPX
TLM
RDS/A
LINE
NBL
SM
QEP
OXY
XEC
APA
RICE
CLR
PXD
MRO
NFX
XCO
SD
US Lower 48 Gas Production Sorted by 1Q15 (MMcf/d)
SWN is 4th overall as of 1Q15
1Q14
1Q11
1Q12
1Q13
1Q15
1Q10
1Q09
SWN
SWN
SWN
SWN
SWN
SWN
SWN
• Strategy built on the Formula: The Right People doing the Right Things, wisely investing the cash flow from the
underlying Assets will create Value +.
$4.40 $4.40 $4.40 $4.40
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
16
2015 Gas Hedges in Place
Bcf
Fixed Price
Forward-Looking Statement
Total Volumes Hedged 240 Bcf
% of Estimated Gas Production 25%
Average Price per MMBtu $ 4.40
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Bcd/d
Southwestern’s Appalachia Takeaway
17
Industry agreements for ~4 Bcf/d incremental takeaway capacity in northeast PA and ~10 Bcf/d in southwest PA / West
Virginia / Ohio between 2015 and 2018 have been executed and will provide new outlets for the industry.
Estimated SWN
Marketed Volumes at
Jan 1, 2015
Firm Sales
Forward-Looking Statement
Transco
ET Rover
Constitution
Columbia Gas
Tennessee
Millennium
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
ProductionRate(mcfe/d)
Days on Production
9 BCFe Type Curve (Based on LL =7,500 ft) 12 BCFe TypeCurve(Based on LL = 7,500 ft)
15 BCFe TypeCurve(Based on LL = 7,500 ft) Wells Put to Salesin Prior 18 Months (Avg. LL =6,200 ft)
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
ProductionRate(mcfe/d)
Days on Production
10.6 Bcfe Upper Devonian Type Curve (Based on LL = 7500 ft)
Southwest Appalachia – Type Curves
18
Marcellus – Dry Gas Region
EUR: 100% Gas
Marcellus – Wet Gas Region
EUR: ~51% Gas, 1% Condensate, 48% NGLs
Utica
EUR: 100% Gas
Upper Devonian
EUR: ~51% Gas, 1% Condensate, 48% NGLs
Source: Company data
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
ProductionRate(mcfe/d)
Days on Production
16.5 BCF Utica Type Curve (Based on LL = 7,500 ft) James Messenger 3H
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
ProductionRate(mcfe/d)
Days on Production
4 BCFe Type Curve (Based on LL = 7,500 ft) 7 BCFe Type Curve (Based on LL = 7,500 ft)
10 BCFe Type Curve (Based on LL = 7,500 ft) Wells to Sales in Prior 20 Months (Avg. LL = 7,100 ft)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
Sep-10 Mar-11 Sep-11 Mar-12 Sep-12 Mar-13 Sep-13 Mar-14 Sep-14 Mar-15
GrossProduction(Mmcf/d)
Northeast Appalachia
Horizontal Well Performance
19 Forward-Looking Statement
• Gross operated production of 1,148 MMcf/d
as of March 31, 2015
• Firm takeaway capacity in NE Appalachia
of more than 1.3 Bcf/d
Time Frame
30th-Day
Avg Rate
(# of wells)
Average
Completed
Lateral
Length (ft)
Average RE-
RE
(Rig Days)
Average
Completed
Well Cost
($MM)
3rd Qtr 2010 1,405 ( 1) 2,927 22.6 $5.8
4th Qtr 2010 5,584 ( 6) 3,805 19.8 $7.1
1st Qtr 2011 5,052 ( 3) 3,864 18.1 $6.6
2nd Qtr 2011 6,114 ( 7) 4,780 13.4 $6.7
4th Qtr 2011 5,284 ( 5) 4,129 18.8 $6.0
1st Qtr 2012 7,327 (2) 4,009 13.2 $6.0
2nd Qtr 2012 3,859 ( 17) 3,934 12.9 $6.0
3rd Qtr 2012 4,493 ( 8) 4,380 13.2 $5.7
4th Qtr 2012 4,606 ( 22) 3,830 15.9 $7.0
1st Qtr 2013 5,356 ( 21) 4,712 11.0 $7.0
2nd Qtr 2013 5,530 ( 37) 4,371 11.6 $6.6
3rd Qtr 2013 4,470 ( 22) 4,740 11.5 $7.3
4th Qtr 2013 7,589 ( 20) 6,116 10.2 $7.1
1st Qtr 2014 7,009 ( 21) 3,859 10.5 $6.2
2nd Qtr 2014 6,772 ( 23) 4,982 10.3 $6.3
3rd Qtr 2014 6,159 ( 18) 5,288 10.0 $6.3
4th Qtr 2014 6,922 (26) 5,333 10.0 $5.9
1st Qtr 2015 8,217 ( 12) 5,090 11.2 $5.8
Proven History of Effectively Ramping Activity Quickly
Gross operated production of approx.
1,148 MMcf/d as of March 31, 2015.
Northeast Appalachia
Well Performance by County
20
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
0 365 730 1095 1460
DailyRate,Mcf/d
Days of Production
Production by County
Bradford County Lycoming County Susquehanna County Wells on-line < 18 months
8 BCF Type Curve 12 BCF Type Curve 16 BCF Type Curve
Note: Excludes downtime
Company Operated Drilled Wells
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2,200
GrossProduction(MMcfpd)
Gross operated production was approx.
2,038 MMcf/d as of March 31, 2015.
Pipeline
Curtailment
Issues
Weather
Curtailment
Issues
SWN Gross Operated Production
Fayetteville Shale
Horizontal Well Performance
Note: Data as of March 31, 2015.
• Gross operated production of
2,038 MMcf/d as of March 31, 2015
• 2014 Fayetteville Shale F&D cost
of $1.14/Mcf
Time Frame
Wells
Placed on
Production
Average
IP Rate
(Mcf/d)
30th-Day
Avg Rate
(# of wells)
60th-Day
Avg Rate
(# of wells)
Average
Lateral
Length
2007 255 1,682 1,416 (253) 1,238 ( 253) 2,657
2008 329 2,778 2,400 (329) 2,149 ( 328) 3,619
2009 446 3,475 2,666 (446) 2,369 ( 444) 4,100
2010 553 3,363 2,530 (553) 2,244 ( 551) 4,528
2011 560 3,328 2,546 (560) 2,205 ( 560) 4,836
1st Qtr 2012 146 3,319 2,421 (146) 2,131 ( 146) 4,743
2nd Qtr 2012 131 3,500 2,515 (131) 2,225 ( 131) 4,840
3rd Qtr 2012 105 3,857 2,816 (105) 2,447 ( 105) 4,974
4th Qtr 2012 111 3,962 2,815 (111) 2,405 ( 111) 4,784
1st Qtr 2013 102 3,301 2,366 (102) 2,069 ( 102) 4,942
2nd Qtr 2013 126 3,625 2,233 (126) 1,975 ( 126) 5,165
3rd Qtr 2013 89 4,597 2,696 (89) 2,391 ( 89) 5,490
4th Qtr 2013 97 4,901 2,798 (97) 2,553 ( 97) 5,976
1st Qtr 2014 105 4,272 2,616 (105) 2,205 ( 105) 5,680
2nd Qtr 2014 148 4,369 2,720 (148) 2,112 ( 148) 5,382
3rd Qtr 2014 106 4,303 2,680 (106) 2,174 (106) 5,202
4th Qtr 2014 97 4,840 2,472 (97) 1,856 ( 95) 5,547
1st Qtr 2015 99 4,357 2,502 (63) 1,915 ( 33) 5,875
21
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
Days of Production
Mcf/d
4 Bcf Typecurve
3 Bcf Typecurve
2 Bcf Typecurve
All Wells
Wells with Laterals >5000' DLL
Wells with Laterals >4000' DLL
Wells with Laterals >3000' DLL
Fayetteville Shale
Horizontal Well Performance
22
Notes: Data as of December 31, 2014. Excludes shut-in wells and wells with mechanical problems (114).
598 472
300 252 131189913 886 827 764 682 631 584 534
2048 2005 1908 1783 1661 1574 1489 1385 9871301
358504
11071210
469
862
417
3503
3181 19593038 25793452 2838 23162942 2147
Total
Well
Count
24573336 2694 1625 14631798
3064 3014 2901 2747 2607 2511 2409 2155 20392266 10791902 1742 1566 1408 1241
733
>3,000 ft
Well
Count
>4,000 ft
Well
Count
>5,000 ft
Well
Count
AR
Midstream
23
FAYETTEVILLE SHALE GATHERING
Gathered Volumes at March 31, 2015 (Bcf/d) 2.3
Gathering Lines (Miles) 2,029
Firm Transportation Capacity (Bcf/d) 2.0
Compression Equipment (Horsepower) 589,305
2015 Estimated EBITDA ($MM)(1) $275 - $285
(1) EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. See explanation and reconciliation on page 35. Forward-Looking Statement
SWN MARKETING
2015 Estimated Discount to NYMEX Gas ($/Mcf) $0.70 - $0.85
2015 Estimated Gas Volumes Marketed (Bcf) 1,030 – 1,050
2015 Estimated EBITDA ($MM)(1) $45 - $55
Black Oil
Condensate
& Volatile Oil
Dry Gas
Exploration – Sand Wash Basin Niobrara
• Proven Hydrocarbon System
• Niobrara vertical prod since 1920’s with avg. 130 MBOE/well
• Contiguous 380,000 Net Acres in AOI
• 75% fee, 15% federal, 10% state
• Thick, Continuous Section
• Favorable reservoir characteristics for resource play development
• Forward focus on Condensate and Volatile Oil Windows
• Southwestern's Activity
• Drilled four vertical and one horizontal Niobrara wells in 2014
• 3 well program planned in 2015 (2 horizontal and 1 vertical)
24
Diamond T Sheep
7-92 1-26
Welker 42-11
Welker 6-92 1-2H11
Dill Gulch 1-22
North Hayden 1-26
4.5
Miles
90
N
2014 Wells
25
Brown Dense Exploration Project
• SWN currently holds 304,000 net acres in Lower Smackover Brown Dense play. Total land cost
of $831 per acre; 81% NRI; most leases have 3-year terms and 3 to 4-year extensions.
• Targeting oil and wet gas window in Upper Jurassic age, kerogen-rich carbonate in southern
Arkansas and northern Louisiana.
 Targeting 300 to 550 feet thick section at depths of 8,000 - 11,000 feet.
• Currently analyzing recently acquired 75 square miles of 3-D seismic data in Union Parish.
Forward-Looking Statement
A r k a n s a s
L o u i s i a n a
Texas
Camden
El Dorado
MagnoliaTexarkana
Bastrop
Bossier City
Minden
Monroe
Ruston
Shreveport
West Monroe
-4,000-5,000
-6,000
-7,000
-9,000
-8,000
-14,000
-12,000
HempsteadLittle River
Miller
Lafayette
Bowie
Cass
Caddo
Bossier
Marion
Harrison
Webster
Claiborne Union
Morehouse
West
Carroll
Richland
Franklin
Lincoln
Ouachita
Bienville
Jackson
Nevada
Drew
Ashley
Ouachita Calhoun
Bradley
Columbia Union
0 10 20
Miles
Legend
Oil and Gas Fields
Product
Gas
Oil
Rodessa
Monroe
Gas
Field
Roberson (TA’d)
Peak=103 bo+180 mcfEast
Texas
Arkoma
Basin
Fayetteville
Shale
Garrett
Peak=301 bc+1720 mcf
BML
Peak=421 bc+3900 mcf
Oil Field
Gas Field
OBO well
SWN Drilled
Johnson-Vert
Shut in
SWN 2014 Plan
Doles
Peak=435 bc+2500 mcf
1
2
3
4
6
Dean-Vert
Peak=214 bc+1207 mcf
5
Dean-Hzl
Peak=43 bc + 618 mcf
7
Hollis-Vert (SI)
Peak=37 bo+428 mcf
9
McMahen-Vert (SI)
Peak=17 bo+299mcf
10
Plum Creek 13-Vert (SI)
Peak=75 bo+184 mcf
11
Milstead-Vert
Peak=28 bo+161 mcf
12 Sharp-Vert
Peak=600 bo+1300 mcf
8
Benson-Vert
Peak=706 bo+2132 mcf
3
14
Plum Creek 23-Vert
Peak=68 bc+247 mcf
13
Drilling & Completion Major Cost Categories
Average Fayetteville Shale Well Cost Estimate
26 Forward-Looking Statement
Major Cost Categories
27
U.S. Dry Gas
Production
U.S. Gas
Consumption
Net Imports
Source: EIA
U.S. Gas Consumption and Sources
U.S. gas production and
consumption rising
in recent years.
Bcf
U.S. Electricity Generation
28
Electricity Generation by Energy Source
1. Geothermal, solar, wood, waste and wind
2. Petroleum and others gases
Source: EIA
Total 4,085 Billion KWh (Mar 2014 – Feb 2015).
1
2
29
U.S. Natural Gas Supply and Demand
12 Month Rolling Average
Source: EIA
30
U.S. Gas Drilling and Prices
Gas Rigs
Drilling
Gas Price
$/MMBtu
Source: Baker Hughes, Bloomberg
Gas Rigs
Gas Price
31
$/Bbl $/MMBtu
Source: Bloomberg
Oil and Gas Price Comparison
Henry Hub
Natural Gas
(right scale)
WTI Crude
(left scale)
32
2015 2014 2014 2013 2012
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenues 933$ 1,113$ 4,038$ 3,371$ 2,730$
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
492$ 623$ 2,320$ 1,998$ 1,638$
Adjusted Net Income(2)
84$ 231$ 801$ 704$ 487$
Net Cash Flow(1)
493$ 617$ 2,270$ 1,985$ 1,599$
Adjusted Diluted EPS(2)
0.22$ 0.66$ 2.27$ 2.00$ 1.39$
Production (Bcfe) 233 182 768 657 565
Avg. Realized Gas Price ($/Mcf) 2.99$ 4.19$ 3.72$ 3.65$ 3.44$
Avg. Realized Oil Price ($/Bbl) 30.90$ 100.43$ 79.91$ 103.32$ 101.54$
Finding Cost ($/Mcfe)(3)
1.81$ 0.62$ 2.08$
Reserve Replacement (%)(3)
520% 501% 163%
Total Debt/Proved Reserves ($/Mcfe) 0.48$ (4)
0.26$ (4)
0.65$ 0.28$ 0.42$
Total Debt/Avg. Daily Production ($/Mcfe) 2,084$ 904$ 3,309$ 1,084$ 1,081$
Net Debt/Total Capitalization 42% 32% 60% 35% 35%
Year Ended December 31,
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
Quarter Ended March 31,
Financial & Operational Summary
(1) Net cash flow is net cash flow before changes in operating assets and liabilities. Diluted cash flow per share is net cash flow divided by the diluted weighted average common shares
outstanding disclosed in the company’s financial statements. Net cash flow, Adjusted EBITDA and diluted CFPS are non-GAAP financial measures.
(2) Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted EPS exclude non-cash ceiling test impairments and gains (losses) on derivatives, net of settlement, and both are non-GAAP financial measures.
See explanations and reconciliations on page 34.
(3) Excludes reserve revisions and excludes capital investments in our sand facility, drilling rig related and ancillary equipment.
(4) Calculated using end of the year proved reserves disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the preceding year.
33
We report our financial results in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). However, management
believes certain non-GAAP performance measures may provide users of this financial information additional meaningful comparisons between current results and
the results of our peers and of prior periods. One such non-GAAP financial measure is net cash flow. Management presents this measure because (i) it is accepted
as an indicator of an oil and gas exploration and production company’s ability to internally fund exploration and development activities and to service or incur
additional debt, (ii) changes in operating assets and liabilities relate to the timing of cash receipts and disbursements which the company may not control and (iii)
changes in operating assets and liabilities may not relate to the period in which the operating activities occurred. These adjusted amounts are not a measure of
financial performance under GAAP.
Explanation and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP
Financial Measures: Net Cash Flow
Forward-Looking Statement
2015 2014 2014 2013 2012
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities 541$ 609$ 2,335$ 1,909$ 1,654$
Add back (deduct):
Change in operating assets and liabilities (48) 8 (65) 76 (55)
Net cash flow 493$ 617$ 2,270$ 1,985$ 1,599$
$3.00 Gas $3.25 Gas $3.25 Gas
$60.00 Oil $50.00 Oil $60.00 Oil
($ in millions)
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities $1,640 - $1,660 $1,760 - $1,780 $1,800 - $1,820
Add back (deduct):
Assumed change in operating assets and liabilities - - -
Net cash flow $1,640 - $1,660 $1,760 - $1,780 $1,800 - $1,820
NYMEX Commodity Price Assumption
2015 Guidance
12 Months Ended December 31,
($ in millions)
3 Months Ended March 31,
($ in millions)
($ in millions (per share) ($ in millions (per share) ($ in millions) (per share)
Net income (loss) 924$ 2.62$ 704$ 2.00$ (707)$ (2.03)$
Add back:
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties, net of taxes - - - - 1,193$ 3.42$
Adjustments due to discrete tax items (46) (0.13) 13 0.04 - -
Loss (gain) on derivatives excluding derivatives, settled (net of taxes) (80)$ (0.23)$ (13)$ (0.04)$ 1$ -
Transaction costs (net of taxes) 3$ 0.01$ - - - -
Adjusted net income 801$ 2.27$ 704$ 2.00$ 487$ 1.39$
2014 2013 2012
12 Months Ended December 31,
34
Additional non-GAAP financial measures we may present from time to time are adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share attributable to
Southwestern Energy stockholders, both of which exclude certain charges or amounts. Management presents these measures because (i) they are consistent
with the manner in which the Company’s performance is measured relative to the performance of its peers, (ii) these measures are more comparable to
earnings estimates provided by securities analysts, and (iii) charges or amounts excluded cannot be reasonably estimated and guidance provided by the
Company excludes information regarding these types of items. These adjusted amounts are not a measure of financial performance under GAAP.
Explanation and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP
Financial Measures: Adjusted Net Income
(1) Primarily relates to the exclusion of certain discrete tax adjustments due to a redetermination of deferred state tax liabilities to reflect updated state apportionment factors
and the recognition of an income tax valuation allowance for state net operating losses. The company expects its 2015 effective income tax rate to be 38.5%.
(1)
($ in millions) (per share) ($ in millions) (per share)
Net income attributable to common stock: 46$ 0.12$ 194$ 0.55$
Add back:
Loss (gain) on derivatives excluding derivatives, settled (net of taxes) 11$ 0.03$ 37$ 0.11$
Transaction costs (net of taxes) 27$ 0.07$ -$ -$
Adjusted net income 84$ 0.22$ 231$ 0.66$
3 Months Ended December 31,
2015 2014
2015 Guidance(3)
NYMEX Commodity Price Assumption Midstream
$3.00 Gas $3.25 Gas $3.25 Gas Services
$60.00 Oil $50.00 Oil $60.00 Oil Segment
($ in millions)
Net Income Attributable to Common Stock $140 - $160 $215 - $235 $240 - $260 $155 - $165
Add back: Preferred Dividends 106 - 106 106 - 106 106 - 106 -
Adj. Net Income Attributable to SWN 246 - 266 321 - 341 346 - 366 155 - 165
Add back:
Provision for income taxes 154 - 167 201 - 213 217 - 229 97 - 103
Interest expense 20 - 25 20 - 25 20 - 25 10 - 20
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 1,185 - 1,195 1,185 - 1,195 1,185 - 1,195 54 - 56
Less: Preferred Dividends 106 - 106 106 - 106 106 - 106 -
EBITDA $1,525 - $1,545 $1,645 - $1,665 $1,680 - $1,700 $325 - $335
3 Months Ended
March 31, 12 Months Ended December 31,
2015 2014 2014 2013 2012(1) 2011 2010 2009(1) 2008 2007
($ in millions)
Net income (loss) $78 $194 $924 $704 ($707) 638 $604 ($37) $568 $221
Add back:
Net interest expense 51 13 59 42 35 24 26 19 29 24
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 49 129 525 486 (443) 413 392 (16) 351 136
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 293 225 942 787 2,751 705 590 1,402 414 294
Less: Unrealized gains (losses) on
derivatives 21 62 130 21 (2) 6 10 (15) - -
Adjusted EBITDA (2) $492 $623 $2,320 $1,998 $1,638 $1,774 $1,602 $1,383 $1,362 $675
35
EBITDA is defined as net income plus interest, income tax expense, depreciation, depletion and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA less
gains and/or losses on derivatives (net of settlement). Southwestern has included information concerning EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA because they are
used by certain investors as a measure of the ability of a company to service or incur indebtedness and because it is a financial measure commonly used in
the energy industry. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income, net cash provided by operating
activities or other income or cash flow data prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or as a measure of the company's
profitability or liquidity. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, as defined above, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Net income
is a financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The table below reconciles historical Adjusted
EBITDA with historical net income.
Explanation and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP
Financial Measures: Adjusted EBITDA
Forward-Looking Statement
The table below reconciles forecasted Adjusted EBITDA with forecasted net income for 2015, assuming various NYMEX price scenarios and the corresponding
estimated impact on the company's results for 2015, including current hedges in place:
(1) Includes impact from full cost ceiling test impairment of our natural gas and oil properties.
(2) As reported in the quarterly report filed with the SEC, this amount excludes the impact from preferred dividends. However, the guidance table below includes the impact of preferred dividends as part of EBITDA.
(3) Excludes impacts from assets previously announced to be divested during 2015.

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Southwestern Energy July 2015 Update

08 08-14-q2-2014-webcast-presentation
08 08-14-q2-2014-webcast-presentation08 08-14-q2-2014-webcast-presentation
08 08-14-q2-2014-webcast-presentationAuRico Gold
 
National Fuel Gas Company Earnings Slides - Nov 2016
National Fuel Gas Company Earnings Slides - Nov 2016National Fuel Gas Company Earnings Slides - Nov 2016
National Fuel Gas Company Earnings Slides - Nov 2016Marcellus Drilling News
 
Q3 2014 Webcast Presentation
Q3 2014 Webcast PresentationQ3 2014 Webcast Presentation
Q3 2014 Webcast PresentationAuRico Gold
 
Denver Gold Forum 2014
Denver Gold Forum 2014Denver Gold Forum 2014
Denver Gold Forum 2014AuRico Gold
 
New York Marketing
New York MarketingNew York Marketing
New York MarketingAuRico Gold
 
Mackie Sales Desk Presentation
Mackie Sales Desk PresentationMackie Sales Desk Presentation
Mackie Sales Desk PresentationAuRico Gold
 
Bank of America Merrill Lynch 20th Annual Canada Mining Conference
Bank of America Merrill Lynch 20th Annual Canada Mining ConferenceBank of America Merrill Lynch 20th Annual Canada Mining Conference
Bank of America Merrill Lynch 20th Annual Canada Mining ConferenceAuRico Gold
 
First Quarter 2015 Conference Call and Webcast Presentation
First Quarter 2015 Conference Call and Webcast PresentationFirst Quarter 2015 Conference Call and Webcast Presentation
First Quarter 2015 Conference Call and Webcast Presentationyamanagold2015
 
Bonterra february-13-2014-investor-update
Bonterra february-13-2014-investor-updateBonterra february-13-2014-investor-update
Bonterra february-13-2014-investor-updateCompany Spotlight
 
Q1 2013 Financial Results
Q1 2013 Financial ResultsQ1 2013 Financial Results
Q1 2013 Financial ResultsAuRico Gold
 
Q1 2013 Financial Results
Q1 2013 Financial ResultsQ1 2013 Financial Results
Q1 2013 Financial ResultsAuRico Gold
 
Q1 2015 Results Presentation
Q1 2015 Results PresentationQ1 2015 Results Presentation
Q1 2015 Results PresentationDetourGold
 
Presentation dgc 15-04_29 _ q1 2015 webcast
Presentation   dgc 15-04_29 _ q1 2015 webcastPresentation   dgc 15-04_29 _ q1 2015 webcast
Presentation dgc 15-04_29 _ q1 2015 webcastDetourGold
 
November marketing-revised-final
November marketing-revised-finalNovember marketing-revised-final
November marketing-revised-finalyamanagold2015
 
Corporate Summary - November 2014
Corporate Summary - November 2014Corporate Summary - November 2014
Corporate Summary - November 2014yamanagold2015
 
National Fuel Gas - Enercom
National Fuel Gas - EnercomNational Fuel Gas - Enercom
National Fuel Gas - EnercomRons Dixon
 
Dgc 15 07_30 - corporate presentation
Dgc 15 07_30 - corporate presentationDgc 15 07_30 - corporate presentation
Dgc 15 07_30 - corporate presentationDetourGold
 

Similaire à Southwestern Energy July 2015 Update (20)

08 08-14-q2-2014-webcast-presentation
08 08-14-q2-2014-webcast-presentation08 08-14-q2-2014-webcast-presentation
08 08-14-q2-2014-webcast-presentation
 
National Fuel Gas Company Earnings Slides - Nov 2016
National Fuel Gas Company Earnings Slides - Nov 2016National Fuel Gas Company Earnings Slides - Nov 2016
National Fuel Gas Company Earnings Slides - Nov 2016
 
Q3 2014 Webcast Presentation
Q3 2014 Webcast PresentationQ3 2014 Webcast Presentation
Q3 2014 Webcast Presentation
 
Denver Gold Forum 2014
Denver Gold Forum 2014Denver Gold Forum 2014
Denver Gold Forum 2014
 
New York Marketing
New York MarketingNew York Marketing
New York Marketing
 
Mackie Sales Desk Presentation
Mackie Sales Desk PresentationMackie Sales Desk Presentation
Mackie Sales Desk Presentation
 
Bank of America Merrill Lynch 20th Annual Canada Mining Conference
Bank of America Merrill Lynch 20th Annual Canada Mining ConferenceBank of America Merrill Lynch 20th Annual Canada Mining Conference
Bank of America Merrill Lynch 20th Annual Canada Mining Conference
 
First Quarter 2015 Conference Call and Webcast Presentation
First Quarter 2015 Conference Call and Webcast PresentationFirst Quarter 2015 Conference Call and Webcast Presentation
First Quarter 2015 Conference Call and Webcast Presentation
 
Bonterra february-13-2014-investor-update
Bonterra february-13-2014-investor-updateBonterra february-13-2014-investor-update
Bonterra february-13-2014-investor-update
 
Q1 2013 Financial Results
Q1 2013 Financial ResultsQ1 2013 Financial Results
Q1 2013 Financial Results
 
Q1 2013 Financial Results
Q1 2013 Financial ResultsQ1 2013 Financial Results
Q1 2013 Financial Results
 
Q1 2015 Results Presentation
Q1 2015 Results PresentationQ1 2015 Results Presentation
Q1 2015 Results Presentation
 
Presentation dgc 15-04_29 _ q1 2015 webcast
Presentation   dgc 15-04_29 _ q1 2015 webcastPresentation   dgc 15-04_29 _ q1 2015 webcast
Presentation dgc 15-04_29 _ q1 2015 webcast
 
4Q 2018 Earnings
4Q 2018 Earnings4Q 2018 Earnings
4Q 2018 Earnings
 
Investor presentations dec final
Investor presentations dec finalInvestor presentations dec final
Investor presentations dec final
 
Fort mckaypresentation web
Fort mckaypresentation webFort mckaypresentation web
Fort mckaypresentation web
 
November marketing-revised-final
November marketing-revised-finalNovember marketing-revised-final
November marketing-revised-final
 
Corporate Summary - November 2014
Corporate Summary - November 2014Corporate Summary - November 2014
Corporate Summary - November 2014
 
National Fuel Gas - Enercom
National Fuel Gas - EnercomNational Fuel Gas - Enercom
National Fuel Gas - Enercom
 
Dgc 15 07_30 - corporate presentation
Dgc 15 07_30 - corporate presentationDgc 15 07_30 - corporate presentation
Dgc 15 07_30 - corporate presentation
 

Plus de Marcellus Drilling News

Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongFive facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongMarcellus Drilling News
 
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Marcellus Drilling News
 
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateAccess Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateMarcellus Drilling News
 
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateRover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateMarcellus Drilling News
 
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesDOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesMarcellus Drilling News
 
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingLSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingMarcellus Drilling News
 
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Marcellus Drilling News
 
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesReport: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesMarcellus Drilling News
 
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsVelocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsMarcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...Marcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...Marcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsPA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsMarcellus Drilling News
 
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookUS EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookMarcellus Drilling News
 
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideNortheast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideMarcellus Drilling News
 
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditPA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditMarcellus Drilling News
 
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Marcellus Drilling News
 
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportClyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportMarcellus Drilling News
 
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectFERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectMarcellus Drilling News
 

Plus de Marcellus Drilling News (20)

Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongFive facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
 
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
 
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateAccess Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
 
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateRover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
 
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesDOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
 
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingLSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
 
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
 
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesReport: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
 
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
 
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
 
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsVelocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
 
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
 
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
 
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsPA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
 
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookUS EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
 
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideNortheast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
 
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditPA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
 
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
 
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportClyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
 
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectFERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
 

Dernier

Mitochondrial Fusion Vital for Adult Brain Function and Disease Understanding...
Mitochondrial Fusion Vital for Adult Brain Function and Disease Understanding...Mitochondrial Fusion Vital for Adult Brain Function and Disease Understanding...
Mitochondrial Fusion Vital for Adult Brain Function and Disease Understanding...The Lifesciences Magazine
 
Foreign Relation of Pakistan with Neighboring Countries.pptx
Foreign Relation of Pakistan with Neighboring Countries.pptxForeign Relation of Pakistan with Neighboring Countries.pptx
Foreign Relation of Pakistan with Neighboring Countries.pptxunark75
 
Emerging issues in migration policies.ppt
Emerging issues in migration policies.pptEmerging issues in migration policies.ppt
Emerging issues in migration policies.pptNandinituteja1
 
13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
lok sabha Elections in india- 2024 .pptx
lok sabha Elections in india- 2024 .pptxlok sabha Elections in india- 2024 .pptx
lok sabha Elections in india- 2024 .pptxdigiyvbmrkt
 
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
14042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
14042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf14042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
14042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
Geostrategic significance of South Asian countries.ppt
Geostrategic significance of South Asian countries.pptGeostrategic significance of South Asian countries.ppt
Geostrategic significance of South Asian countries.pptUsmanKaran
 
Power in International Relations (Pol 5)
Power in International Relations (Pol 5)Power in International Relations (Pol 5)
Power in International Relations (Pol 5)ssuser583c35
 
Transforming Andhra Pradesh: TDP's Legacy in Road Connectivity
Transforming Andhra Pradesh: TDP's Legacy in Road ConnectivityTransforming Andhra Pradesh: TDP's Legacy in Road Connectivity
Transforming Andhra Pradesh: TDP's Legacy in Road Connectivitynarsireddynannuri1
 
12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
Political-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptx
Political-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptxPolitical-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptx
Political-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptxSasikiranMarri
 

Dernier (14)

Mitochondrial Fusion Vital for Adult Brain Function and Disease Understanding...
Mitochondrial Fusion Vital for Adult Brain Function and Disease Understanding...Mitochondrial Fusion Vital for Adult Brain Function and Disease Understanding...
Mitochondrial Fusion Vital for Adult Brain Function and Disease Understanding...
 
Foreign Relation of Pakistan with Neighboring Countries.pptx
Foreign Relation of Pakistan with Neighboring Countries.pptxForeign Relation of Pakistan with Neighboring Countries.pptx
Foreign Relation of Pakistan with Neighboring Countries.pptx
 
Emerging issues in migration policies.ppt
Emerging issues in migration policies.pptEmerging issues in migration policies.ppt
Emerging issues in migration policies.ppt
 
13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
11042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
lok sabha Elections in india- 2024 .pptx
lok sabha Elections in india- 2024 .pptxlok sabha Elections in india- 2024 .pptx
lok sabha Elections in india- 2024 .pptx
 
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
14042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
14042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf14042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
14042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Geostrategic significance of South Asian countries.ppt
Geostrategic significance of South Asian countries.pptGeostrategic significance of South Asian countries.ppt
Geostrategic significance of South Asian countries.ppt
 
Power in International Relations (Pol 5)
Power in International Relations (Pol 5)Power in International Relations (Pol 5)
Power in International Relations (Pol 5)
 
Transforming Andhra Pradesh: TDP's Legacy in Road Connectivity
Transforming Andhra Pradesh: TDP's Legacy in Road ConnectivityTransforming Andhra Pradesh: TDP's Legacy in Road Connectivity
Transforming Andhra Pradesh: TDP's Legacy in Road Connectivity
 
12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
12042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Political-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptx
Political-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptxPolitical-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptx
Political-Ideologies-and-The-Movements.pptx
 

Southwestern Energy July 2015 Update

  • 2. 1 Southwestern Energy Company • General Information • Southwestern Energy Company is an independent natural gas company whose wholly-owned subsidiaries are engaged in natural gas and oil exploration and production and natural gas gathering and marketing. • Investor Contacts • Steve Mueller Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Phone: (832) 796-4700 Fax: (832) 796-4820 Craig Owen Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Phone: (832) 796-2808 Fax: (832) 796-4820 • Market Data as of June 30, 2015 • Institutional Ownership – 92.2% Management and Board Ownership – 0.6% Shares of Common Stock Outstanding – 384,600,000 Market Capitalization – $8,742,000,000 NYSE: SWN 52-Week Price Range – $21.63 (3/10/15) – $44.99 (7/1/14) Investment Grade Credit Rating – Moody’s (Baa3); S&P (BBB-); Fitch (BBB-) Michael Hancock Director, Investor Relations Phone: (832) 796-7367 Fax: (832) 796-4820 craig_owen@swn.com michael_hancock@swn.com
  • 3. 2 All statements, other than historical facts and financial information, may be deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements that address activities, outcomes and other matters that should or may occur in the future, including, without limitation, statements regarding the financial position, business strategy, production and reserve growth and other plans and objectives for the company’s future operations, are forward-looking statements. Although the company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. The company has no obligation and makes no undertaking to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, other than to the extent set forth below. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. They are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect the company’s operations, markets, products, services and prices and cause its actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward- looking statements. In addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with forward-looking statements, risks, uncertainties and factors that could cause the company’s actual results to differ materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statement include, but are not limited to: the timing and extent of changes in market conditions and prices for natural gas and oil (including regional basis differentials); the company’s ability to fund the company’s planned capital investments; the company’s ability to transport its production to the most favorable markets or at all; the timing and extent of the company’s success in discovering, developing, producing and estimating reserves; the economic viability of, and the company’s success in drilling, the company’s large acreage position in various areas and, in particular, the Fayetteville Shale, Northeast Appalachia and Southwest Appalachia as well as relative to other productive shale gas plays; the company’s ability to realize the expected benefits from recent acquisitions; the impact of title and environmental defects and other matters on the value of the properties acquired in the company’s recent acquisitions and any other future acquisitions; difficulties in integrating the company’s operations as a result of any significant acquisitions; the impact of government regulation, including any legislation relating to hydraulic fracturing, the climate or over-the-counter derivatives; the costs and availability of oil field personnel services and drilling supplies, raw materials and equipment, including pressure pumping equipment and crews; the company’s ability to determine the most effective and economic fracture stimulation; the company’s future property acquisition or divestiture activities; the effects of weather; increased competition and regulation; the financial impact of accounting regulations and critical accounting policies; the comparative cost of alternative fuels; the different risks and uncertainties associated with proposed activities in Canada; conditions in capital markets, changes in interest rates and the ability of the company’s lenders to provide it with funds as agreed; credit risk relating to the risk of loss as a result of non-performance by the company’s counterparties; and any other factors listed in the reports the company has filed and may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). For additional information with respect to certain of these and other factors, see the reports filed by the company with the SEC. The company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Forward-Looking Statements The contents of this presentation are current as of July 1, 2015.
  • 4. 3 Southwestern Energy Consistently Creates Value • Strategy built on the formula – The Right People doing the Right Things, wisely investing the cash flow from the underlying Assets will create Value + • 4th largest producer of natural gas in the U.S. Lower 48 for 1Q 2015 – 2014 production of 768 Bcfe – 10.7 Tcfe of proved reserves at December 2014 • World-class assets – High degree of operational control and flexibility – Access to all major markets • Demonstrated capital discipline – Average return on equity(1) of 15% over the past three years – Target $1.30 of present value cash flow, discounted at 10%, for each dollar invested (defined as 1.3 PVI) – Commitment to maintain investment grade credit profile • Differentiating focus on low-cost structure with proven track record – From 2009 – 2014: • 21% compound annual production growth and per share growth • 24% compound annual reserve growth and per share growth – Cash operating costs(2) of $1.32 per Mcfe in 2014 (1) Excludes impact of full cost ceiling test impairments (2) Cash operating costs for 2014 include lease operating expenses ($0.91/Mcfe), general and administrative expenses ($0.24/Mcfe), taxes other than income taxes ($0.11/Mcfe) and net interest expense ($0.06/Mcfe)
  • 5. Sand Wash Basin – Approx. 376,000 net acres Brown Dense – Approx. 304,000 net acres New Brunswick – Approx. 2.5 million net acres Other New Ventures – Approx. 982,000 net acres D A FAYETTEVILLE SHALE 2014 Reserves: 5,069 Bcf (47%) 2014 Production: 494 Bcf (64%) Net Acres: 888,161 (12/31/14) B SOUTHWEST APPALACHIA 2014 Reserves: 2,297 Bcfe (22%) Dec 2014 Production: 370 Mmcfe/d Net Acres: 443,376 (Jan 2015)(2) C NORTHEAST APPALACHIA 2014 Reserves: 3,192 Bcf (30%) 2014 Production: 254 Bcf (33%) Net Acres: 312,773 (Jan 2015)(1) RESERVES & PRODUCTION 2014 Reserves: 10,747 Bcfe 2014 Production: 768 Bcfe 2015 Estimated Production: 940-955 Bcfe 4 North American Areas of Operation D C D D NEW VENTURES LA TX CO OK AR WV PA NB (!) Includes approximately 46,700 net acres that were acquired as part of transaction closed in January 2015 (2) Includes approximately 30,000 net acres that were acquired as part of transaction closed in January 2015 A EXPLORATION B Forward-Looking Statement
  • 6. $675 $1,362 $1,383 $1,602 $1,774 $1,638 $1,997 $2,320 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Adjusted EBITDA ($MM) 2.70 1.70 0.91 1.24 1.34 2.08 0.62 1.29 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 F&D Cost ($/Mcfe) 113 195 300 405 500 565 657 768 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Production (Bcfe) 1.5 2.2 3.7 4.9 5.9 4.0 7.0 10.7 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Proved Reserves (Tcfe) Proven Track Record 5 (1) Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. See explanation and reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA on page 35. (2) Average realized gas prices ($/Mcf) (3) Excludes reserve revisions (4) Excludes the impact from the West Virginia and southwest Pennsylvania acquisition closed in December 2014. $6.80 $7.52 $5.35 $4.62 $4.18 $3.44 $3.65Price(2) $3.72 (1) (3) Forward-Looking Statement (4)
  • 7. 2,657 3,619 4,100 4,528 4,836 4,819 5,356 5,440 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Lateral Length Continuous Improvement 6 17.5 13.6 11.7 10.9 7.9 6.7 6.2 6.8 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Days to Drill $2.9 $3.0 $2.9 $2.8$2.8 $2.5 $2.4 $2.6 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Well Cost ($ in millions) $2.39 $1.44 $0.80 $1.04 $1.11 $2.53 $0.45 $1.14 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 F&D Cost ($ per Mcf) 716 1,545 3,117 4,345 5,104 2,988 4,795 5,069 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Reserves (in Bcf) 54 135 244 350 437 486 486 494 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Production (in Bcf) Notes: Finding and development costs exclude revisions and capital investments in our sand facility, drilling rig related and ancillary equipment. -61% +608%+815%-11%+105% -52% 25.6 16.5 13.2 12.9 10.2 10 11 12 13 14 Days to Drill 3,805 4,223 4,070 4,982 4,752 10 11 12 13 14 Lateral Length $5.9 $7.0 $6.2 $7.0 $6.1 10 11 12 13 14 Well Cost ($ in millions) 1 23 54 151 254 10 11 12 13 14 Production (in Bcf) -60% +25% $2.98 $1.38 $1.03 $0.73 $0.85 10 11 12 13 14 F&D Cost ($ per Mcf) 38 342 816 1,963 3,192 10 11 12 13 14 Reserves (in Bcf) Northeast Appalachia Fayetteville Shale
  • 8. Enhanced Position in Core Areas of Premier Play Forward-Looking Statement7 SWN acreage shown in yellow Bcf/Section 50 Bcf 100 Bcf 150 Bcf 200 Bcf 250 Bcf 300 Bcf 1Q15 Appalachia Production vs. Peers(1) Unconventional Appalachia Net Acres vs. Peers(1) (1) Source: Company presentations and filings (2) Includes impact from STO and WPX property acquisitions closed in January 2015 (in thousands)(Mmcfe/d) • SWN held approximately 413,000 net acres in West Virginia and southwest Pennsylvania as of December 31, 2014 • In January 2015, additional transaction for approximately 30,000 net acres closed • Plan to participate in 50 to 55 wells in 2015, primarily in the Marcellus wet gas window (2)(2)
  • 9. ID Operator Well Name IP (Mmcfe/d) IP30 (Mmcfe/d) Lateral Length (feet) % Liquids at IP30 MARCELLUS 1 SWN Melvin Kahle 8H 7.9 4,507 58% 2 EQT Pierce Pad (8 wells) 15.4 5,814 0% 3 SWN Gladys Briggs 8H 13.8 5,142 40% 4 SWN Esther Clark 3H 5.2 6,556 0% 5 NBL SHR1 Pad (6 wells) 10.1 8,741 19% 6 AR Mash Unit (2 wells) 15.7 9,835 28% 7 AR Ruth Unit 1H 19.2 6,514 14% 8 SWN Edwin Bunner 8H 4.2 5,600 0% 9 CNX AUD3 6.1 8,691 0% UTICA 1 SWN Hubbard 3H 11.1 8.1 3,550 0% 2 HES NAC 3H-3 11.0 5,336 0% 3 RRC Sportsman's Club 11H 59.0 5,420 0% 4 RICE Bigfoot 9H 41.7 14.0 6,957 0% 5 CVX Conner 6H 25.0 6,451 0% 6 GST Simms 4-5H 29.4 19.8 4,447 0% 7 SWN Messenger 3H 25.0 20.0 5,889 0% 8 SGY Pribble 6H 30.0 3,605 0% 9 MHR S. Winland #1300H 46.5 4,289 0% UPPER DEVONIAN 1 CNX NV39F 3.0 2.9 4,889 0% 2 EQT 7 Well Avg. 8.2 5,964 0% 3 EQT 11 Well Avg. 5.0 4,396 18% Well-Positioned in Rapidly Developing Play 8 2 4 5 6 7 9 1 3 4 8 1 2 3 Marcellus Utica Upper Devonian 6 7 9 2 5 All SWN operated rates exclude shut in days Acquired acreage is low-risk opportunity in the heart of world-class play Source: Public data and company presentations 8 3 1
  • 10. 9 Northeast Appalachia Forward-Looking Statement • We hold approximately 312,000 net acres in Northeast Pennsylvania. • Gross operated production was 1,148 MMcf/d from 348 operated horizontal wells as of March 31, 2015. • We plan to drill 88 to 92 operated horizontal wells in 2015.
  • 11. Fayetteville Shale Focus Area 10 Forward-Looking Statement • SWN holds approx. 888,000 net acres in the Fayetteville Shale play. • SWN discovered the Fayetteville Shale and has first mover advantage – average acreage cost of $320 per acre with a 15% royalty and average working interest of 74%. • We plan to drill approximately 225 to 235 operated horizontal wells in 2015. Notes: Data as of March 31, 2015. Rates are AOGC Form 13 and Form 3 test rates.
  • 12. Capital Investments $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Exploration Drilling Development Drilling Leasehold & Seismic Property Acquisitions Midstream Services Drilling Rigs Corporate & Other Capital Expense & Other E&P $2,120 $2,207 $2,081 $2,235 $2,440 BY SPENDING TYPE in $Millions E&P capital program heavily weighted to low-risk development drilling in 2015. Plan to invest approximately $700 million in Northeast Appalachia $645 million in the Fayetteville Shale and $520 million in Southwest Appalachia in 2015 (including Midstream). Fayetteville 30% NE Appalachia 37% SW Appalachia 27% Exploration and Other 6% E&P BY DIVISION 2015 44% 33% 23% 2014 $2,015 (1) (1) Excludes acquisition capital for transactions announced in 4Q 201411 (1) Forward-Looking Statement
  • 13. 12 (1) Includes amounts associated with assets divested in 2015. (2) Adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA exclude unrealized gains and losses on derivative contracts. All are non-GAAP financial measures. See explanation and reconciliation on pages 34 and 35. (3) Net cash flow is net cash flow before changes in operating assets and liabilities and excludes current taxes associated with any future asset sales. Net cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure. See explanation and reconciliation on page 33. (4) Excludes acquisition capital for transactions announced in 4Q 2014. (5) The impact of preferred dividends is included in Adjusted EBITDA and excluded from Net Cash Flow. Our Path Forward Forward-Looking Statement  Adj. Net Income(2) 2014 Actual  Net Cash Flow(3)(5)  CapEx(4) $4.41 Gas $92.91 Oil  Adj. EBITDA(2)(5)  Debt % NYMEX Price Assumption 2015 Guidance $801 MM $2,270 MM $2,440 MM $2,320 MM 39% $215-$235 MM $1,760-$1,780 MM $2,015 MM $1,645-$1,665 MM 39%-41% $140-$160 MM $1,640-$1,660 MM $2,015 MM $1,525-$1,545 MM 40%-42% $240-$260 MM $1,800-$1,820 MM $2,015 MM $1,680-$1,700 MM 39%-41% $3.25 Gas $50.00 Oil $3.00 Gas $60.00 Oil $3.25 Gas $60.00 Oil (1)
  • 14. 13 • Invest in the Highest PVI Projects • Maintain Strong Balance Sheet • Deliver the Numbers • Curiosity to Learning to Innovation to The Road to
  • 16. About Southwestern Source: Public company reports, Southwestern Energy - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 XOM CHK APC SWN SWN COG SWN DVN COP BP SWN EQT SWN AR CVX BHP SWN EOG RRC ECA UPL SWN CNX WPX TLM RDS/A LINE NBL SM QEP OXY XEC APA RICE CLR PXD MRO NFX XCO SD US Lower 48 Gas Production Sorted by 1Q15 (MMcf/d) SWN is 4th overall as of 1Q15 1Q14 1Q11 1Q12 1Q13 1Q15 1Q10 1Q09 SWN SWN SWN SWN SWN SWN SWN • Strategy built on the Formula: The Right People doing the Right Things, wisely investing the cash flow from the underlying Assets will create Value +.
  • 17. $4.40 $4.40 $4.40 $4.40 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 16 2015 Gas Hedges in Place Bcf Fixed Price Forward-Looking Statement Total Volumes Hedged 240 Bcf % of Estimated Gas Production 25% Average Price per MMBtu $ 4.40
  • 18. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 Bcd/d Southwestern’s Appalachia Takeaway 17 Industry agreements for ~4 Bcf/d incremental takeaway capacity in northeast PA and ~10 Bcf/d in southwest PA / West Virginia / Ohio between 2015 and 2018 have been executed and will provide new outlets for the industry. Estimated SWN Marketed Volumes at Jan 1, 2015 Firm Sales Forward-Looking Statement Transco ET Rover Constitution Columbia Gas Tennessee Millennium
  • 19. 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 ProductionRate(mcfe/d) Days on Production 9 BCFe Type Curve (Based on LL =7,500 ft) 12 BCFe TypeCurve(Based on LL = 7,500 ft) 15 BCFe TypeCurve(Based on LL = 7,500 ft) Wells Put to Salesin Prior 18 Months (Avg. LL =6,200 ft) 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 ProductionRate(mcfe/d) Days on Production 10.6 Bcfe Upper Devonian Type Curve (Based on LL = 7500 ft) Southwest Appalachia – Type Curves 18 Marcellus – Dry Gas Region EUR: 100% Gas Marcellus – Wet Gas Region EUR: ~51% Gas, 1% Condensate, 48% NGLs Utica EUR: 100% Gas Upper Devonian EUR: ~51% Gas, 1% Condensate, 48% NGLs Source: Company data 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 ProductionRate(mcfe/d) Days on Production 16.5 BCF Utica Type Curve (Based on LL = 7,500 ft) James Messenger 3H 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 ProductionRate(mcfe/d) Days on Production 4 BCFe Type Curve (Based on LL = 7,500 ft) 7 BCFe Type Curve (Based on LL = 7,500 ft) 10 BCFe Type Curve (Based on LL = 7,500 ft) Wells to Sales in Prior 20 Months (Avg. LL = 7,100 ft)
  • 20. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Sep-10 Mar-11 Sep-11 Mar-12 Sep-12 Mar-13 Sep-13 Mar-14 Sep-14 Mar-15 GrossProduction(Mmcf/d) Northeast Appalachia Horizontal Well Performance 19 Forward-Looking Statement • Gross operated production of 1,148 MMcf/d as of March 31, 2015 • Firm takeaway capacity in NE Appalachia of more than 1.3 Bcf/d Time Frame 30th-Day Avg Rate (# of wells) Average Completed Lateral Length (ft) Average RE- RE (Rig Days) Average Completed Well Cost ($MM) 3rd Qtr 2010 1,405 ( 1) 2,927 22.6 $5.8 4th Qtr 2010 5,584 ( 6) 3,805 19.8 $7.1 1st Qtr 2011 5,052 ( 3) 3,864 18.1 $6.6 2nd Qtr 2011 6,114 ( 7) 4,780 13.4 $6.7 4th Qtr 2011 5,284 ( 5) 4,129 18.8 $6.0 1st Qtr 2012 7,327 (2) 4,009 13.2 $6.0 2nd Qtr 2012 3,859 ( 17) 3,934 12.9 $6.0 3rd Qtr 2012 4,493 ( 8) 4,380 13.2 $5.7 4th Qtr 2012 4,606 ( 22) 3,830 15.9 $7.0 1st Qtr 2013 5,356 ( 21) 4,712 11.0 $7.0 2nd Qtr 2013 5,530 ( 37) 4,371 11.6 $6.6 3rd Qtr 2013 4,470 ( 22) 4,740 11.5 $7.3 4th Qtr 2013 7,589 ( 20) 6,116 10.2 $7.1 1st Qtr 2014 7,009 ( 21) 3,859 10.5 $6.2 2nd Qtr 2014 6,772 ( 23) 4,982 10.3 $6.3 3rd Qtr 2014 6,159 ( 18) 5,288 10.0 $6.3 4th Qtr 2014 6,922 (26) 5,333 10.0 $5.9 1st Qtr 2015 8,217 ( 12) 5,090 11.2 $5.8 Proven History of Effectively Ramping Activity Quickly Gross operated production of approx. 1,148 MMcf/d as of March 31, 2015.
  • 21. Northeast Appalachia Well Performance by County 20 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 0 365 730 1095 1460 DailyRate,Mcf/d Days of Production Production by County Bradford County Lycoming County Susquehanna County Wells on-line < 18 months 8 BCF Type Curve 12 BCF Type Curve 16 BCF Type Curve Note: Excludes downtime Company Operated Drilled Wells
  • 22. 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 2,200 GrossProduction(MMcfpd) Gross operated production was approx. 2,038 MMcf/d as of March 31, 2015. Pipeline Curtailment Issues Weather Curtailment Issues SWN Gross Operated Production Fayetteville Shale Horizontal Well Performance Note: Data as of March 31, 2015. • Gross operated production of 2,038 MMcf/d as of March 31, 2015 • 2014 Fayetteville Shale F&D cost of $1.14/Mcf Time Frame Wells Placed on Production Average IP Rate (Mcf/d) 30th-Day Avg Rate (# of wells) 60th-Day Avg Rate (# of wells) Average Lateral Length 2007 255 1,682 1,416 (253) 1,238 ( 253) 2,657 2008 329 2,778 2,400 (329) 2,149 ( 328) 3,619 2009 446 3,475 2,666 (446) 2,369 ( 444) 4,100 2010 553 3,363 2,530 (553) 2,244 ( 551) 4,528 2011 560 3,328 2,546 (560) 2,205 ( 560) 4,836 1st Qtr 2012 146 3,319 2,421 (146) 2,131 ( 146) 4,743 2nd Qtr 2012 131 3,500 2,515 (131) 2,225 ( 131) 4,840 3rd Qtr 2012 105 3,857 2,816 (105) 2,447 ( 105) 4,974 4th Qtr 2012 111 3,962 2,815 (111) 2,405 ( 111) 4,784 1st Qtr 2013 102 3,301 2,366 (102) 2,069 ( 102) 4,942 2nd Qtr 2013 126 3,625 2,233 (126) 1,975 ( 126) 5,165 3rd Qtr 2013 89 4,597 2,696 (89) 2,391 ( 89) 5,490 4th Qtr 2013 97 4,901 2,798 (97) 2,553 ( 97) 5,976 1st Qtr 2014 105 4,272 2,616 (105) 2,205 ( 105) 5,680 2nd Qtr 2014 148 4,369 2,720 (148) 2,112 ( 148) 5,382 3rd Qtr 2014 106 4,303 2,680 (106) 2,174 (106) 5,202 4th Qtr 2014 97 4,840 2,472 (97) 1,856 ( 95) 5,547 1st Qtr 2015 99 4,357 2,502 (63) 1,915 ( 33) 5,875 21
  • 23. 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 Days of Production Mcf/d 4 Bcf Typecurve 3 Bcf Typecurve 2 Bcf Typecurve All Wells Wells with Laterals >5000' DLL Wells with Laterals >4000' DLL Wells with Laterals >3000' DLL Fayetteville Shale Horizontal Well Performance 22 Notes: Data as of December 31, 2014. Excludes shut-in wells and wells with mechanical problems (114). 598 472 300 252 131189913 886 827 764 682 631 584 534 2048 2005 1908 1783 1661 1574 1489 1385 9871301 358504 11071210 469 862 417 3503 3181 19593038 25793452 2838 23162942 2147 Total Well Count 24573336 2694 1625 14631798 3064 3014 2901 2747 2607 2511 2409 2155 20392266 10791902 1742 1566 1408 1241 733 >3,000 ft Well Count >4,000 ft Well Count >5,000 ft Well Count
  • 24. AR Midstream 23 FAYETTEVILLE SHALE GATHERING Gathered Volumes at March 31, 2015 (Bcf/d) 2.3 Gathering Lines (Miles) 2,029 Firm Transportation Capacity (Bcf/d) 2.0 Compression Equipment (Horsepower) 589,305 2015 Estimated EBITDA ($MM)(1) $275 - $285 (1) EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. See explanation and reconciliation on page 35. Forward-Looking Statement SWN MARKETING 2015 Estimated Discount to NYMEX Gas ($/Mcf) $0.70 - $0.85 2015 Estimated Gas Volumes Marketed (Bcf) 1,030 – 1,050 2015 Estimated EBITDA ($MM)(1) $45 - $55
  • 25. Black Oil Condensate & Volatile Oil Dry Gas Exploration – Sand Wash Basin Niobrara • Proven Hydrocarbon System • Niobrara vertical prod since 1920’s with avg. 130 MBOE/well • Contiguous 380,000 Net Acres in AOI • 75% fee, 15% federal, 10% state • Thick, Continuous Section • Favorable reservoir characteristics for resource play development • Forward focus on Condensate and Volatile Oil Windows • Southwestern's Activity • Drilled four vertical and one horizontal Niobrara wells in 2014 • 3 well program planned in 2015 (2 horizontal and 1 vertical) 24 Diamond T Sheep 7-92 1-26 Welker 42-11 Welker 6-92 1-2H11 Dill Gulch 1-22 North Hayden 1-26 4.5 Miles 90 N 2014 Wells
  • 26. 25 Brown Dense Exploration Project • SWN currently holds 304,000 net acres in Lower Smackover Brown Dense play. Total land cost of $831 per acre; 81% NRI; most leases have 3-year terms and 3 to 4-year extensions. • Targeting oil and wet gas window in Upper Jurassic age, kerogen-rich carbonate in southern Arkansas and northern Louisiana.  Targeting 300 to 550 feet thick section at depths of 8,000 - 11,000 feet. • Currently analyzing recently acquired 75 square miles of 3-D seismic data in Union Parish. Forward-Looking Statement A r k a n s a s L o u i s i a n a Texas Camden El Dorado MagnoliaTexarkana Bastrop Bossier City Minden Monroe Ruston Shreveport West Monroe -4,000-5,000 -6,000 -7,000 -9,000 -8,000 -14,000 -12,000 HempsteadLittle River Miller Lafayette Bowie Cass Caddo Bossier Marion Harrison Webster Claiborne Union Morehouse West Carroll Richland Franklin Lincoln Ouachita Bienville Jackson Nevada Drew Ashley Ouachita Calhoun Bradley Columbia Union 0 10 20 Miles Legend Oil and Gas Fields Product Gas Oil Rodessa Monroe Gas Field Roberson (TA’d) Peak=103 bo+180 mcfEast Texas Arkoma Basin Fayetteville Shale Garrett Peak=301 bc+1720 mcf BML Peak=421 bc+3900 mcf Oil Field Gas Field OBO well SWN Drilled Johnson-Vert Shut in SWN 2014 Plan Doles Peak=435 bc+2500 mcf 1 2 3 4 6 Dean-Vert Peak=214 bc+1207 mcf 5 Dean-Hzl Peak=43 bc + 618 mcf 7 Hollis-Vert (SI) Peak=37 bo+428 mcf 9 McMahen-Vert (SI) Peak=17 bo+299mcf 10 Plum Creek 13-Vert (SI) Peak=75 bo+184 mcf 11 Milstead-Vert Peak=28 bo+161 mcf 12 Sharp-Vert Peak=600 bo+1300 mcf 8 Benson-Vert Peak=706 bo+2132 mcf 3 14 Plum Creek 23-Vert Peak=68 bc+247 mcf 13
  • 27. Drilling & Completion Major Cost Categories Average Fayetteville Shale Well Cost Estimate 26 Forward-Looking Statement Major Cost Categories
  • 28. 27 U.S. Dry Gas Production U.S. Gas Consumption Net Imports Source: EIA U.S. Gas Consumption and Sources U.S. gas production and consumption rising in recent years. Bcf
  • 29. U.S. Electricity Generation 28 Electricity Generation by Energy Source 1. Geothermal, solar, wood, waste and wind 2. Petroleum and others gases Source: EIA Total 4,085 Billion KWh (Mar 2014 – Feb 2015). 1 2
  • 30. 29 U.S. Natural Gas Supply and Demand 12 Month Rolling Average Source: EIA
  • 31. 30 U.S. Gas Drilling and Prices Gas Rigs Drilling Gas Price $/MMBtu Source: Baker Hughes, Bloomberg Gas Rigs Gas Price
  • 32. 31 $/Bbl $/MMBtu Source: Bloomberg Oil and Gas Price Comparison Henry Hub Natural Gas (right scale) WTI Crude (left scale)
  • 33. 32 2015 2014 2014 2013 2012 ($ in millions, except per share amounts) Revenues 933$ 1,113$ 4,038$ 3,371$ 2,730$ Adjusted EBITDA(1) 492$ 623$ 2,320$ 1,998$ 1,638$ Adjusted Net Income(2) 84$ 231$ 801$ 704$ 487$ Net Cash Flow(1) 493$ 617$ 2,270$ 1,985$ 1,599$ Adjusted Diluted EPS(2) 0.22$ 0.66$ 2.27$ 2.00$ 1.39$ Production (Bcfe) 233 182 768 657 565 Avg. Realized Gas Price ($/Mcf) 2.99$ 4.19$ 3.72$ 3.65$ 3.44$ Avg. Realized Oil Price ($/Bbl) 30.90$ 100.43$ 79.91$ 103.32$ 101.54$ Finding Cost ($/Mcfe)(3) 1.81$ 0.62$ 2.08$ Reserve Replacement (%)(3) 520% 501% 163% Total Debt/Proved Reserves ($/Mcfe) 0.48$ (4) 0.26$ (4) 0.65$ 0.28$ 0.42$ Total Debt/Avg. Daily Production ($/Mcfe) 2,084$ 904$ 3,309$ 1,084$ 1,081$ Net Debt/Total Capitalization 42% 32% 60% 35% 35% Year Ended December 31, ($ in millions, except per share amounts) Quarter Ended March 31, Financial & Operational Summary (1) Net cash flow is net cash flow before changes in operating assets and liabilities. Diluted cash flow per share is net cash flow divided by the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding disclosed in the company’s financial statements. Net cash flow, Adjusted EBITDA and diluted CFPS are non-GAAP financial measures. (2) Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted EPS exclude non-cash ceiling test impairments and gains (losses) on derivatives, net of settlement, and both are non-GAAP financial measures. See explanations and reconciliations on page 34. (3) Excludes reserve revisions and excludes capital investments in our sand facility, drilling rig related and ancillary equipment. (4) Calculated using end of the year proved reserves disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the preceding year.
  • 34. 33 We report our financial results in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). However, management believes certain non-GAAP performance measures may provide users of this financial information additional meaningful comparisons between current results and the results of our peers and of prior periods. One such non-GAAP financial measure is net cash flow. Management presents this measure because (i) it is accepted as an indicator of an oil and gas exploration and production company’s ability to internally fund exploration and development activities and to service or incur additional debt, (ii) changes in operating assets and liabilities relate to the timing of cash receipts and disbursements which the company may not control and (iii) changes in operating assets and liabilities may not relate to the period in which the operating activities occurred. These adjusted amounts are not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Explanation and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures: Net Cash Flow Forward-Looking Statement 2015 2014 2014 2013 2012 Cash flow from operating activities: Net cash provided by operating activities 541$ 609$ 2,335$ 1,909$ 1,654$ Add back (deduct): Change in operating assets and liabilities (48) 8 (65) 76 (55) Net cash flow 493$ 617$ 2,270$ 1,985$ 1,599$ $3.00 Gas $3.25 Gas $3.25 Gas $60.00 Oil $50.00 Oil $60.00 Oil ($ in millions) Cash flow from operating activities: Net cash provided by operating activities $1,640 - $1,660 $1,760 - $1,780 $1,800 - $1,820 Add back (deduct): Assumed change in operating assets and liabilities - - - Net cash flow $1,640 - $1,660 $1,760 - $1,780 $1,800 - $1,820 NYMEX Commodity Price Assumption 2015 Guidance 12 Months Ended December 31, ($ in millions) 3 Months Ended March 31, ($ in millions)
  • 35. ($ in millions (per share) ($ in millions (per share) ($ in millions) (per share) Net income (loss) 924$ 2.62$ 704$ 2.00$ (707)$ (2.03)$ Add back: Impairment of natural gas and oil properties, net of taxes - - - - 1,193$ 3.42$ Adjustments due to discrete tax items (46) (0.13) 13 0.04 - - Loss (gain) on derivatives excluding derivatives, settled (net of taxes) (80)$ (0.23)$ (13)$ (0.04)$ 1$ - Transaction costs (net of taxes) 3$ 0.01$ - - - - Adjusted net income 801$ 2.27$ 704$ 2.00$ 487$ 1.39$ 2014 2013 2012 12 Months Ended December 31, 34 Additional non-GAAP financial measures we may present from time to time are adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share attributable to Southwestern Energy stockholders, both of which exclude certain charges or amounts. Management presents these measures because (i) they are consistent with the manner in which the Company’s performance is measured relative to the performance of its peers, (ii) these measures are more comparable to earnings estimates provided by securities analysts, and (iii) charges or amounts excluded cannot be reasonably estimated and guidance provided by the Company excludes information regarding these types of items. These adjusted amounts are not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Explanation and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures: Adjusted Net Income (1) Primarily relates to the exclusion of certain discrete tax adjustments due to a redetermination of deferred state tax liabilities to reflect updated state apportionment factors and the recognition of an income tax valuation allowance for state net operating losses. The company expects its 2015 effective income tax rate to be 38.5%. (1) ($ in millions) (per share) ($ in millions) (per share) Net income attributable to common stock: 46$ 0.12$ 194$ 0.55$ Add back: Loss (gain) on derivatives excluding derivatives, settled (net of taxes) 11$ 0.03$ 37$ 0.11$ Transaction costs (net of taxes) 27$ 0.07$ -$ -$ Adjusted net income 84$ 0.22$ 231$ 0.66$ 3 Months Ended December 31, 2015 2014
  • 36. 2015 Guidance(3) NYMEX Commodity Price Assumption Midstream $3.00 Gas $3.25 Gas $3.25 Gas Services $60.00 Oil $50.00 Oil $60.00 Oil Segment ($ in millions) Net Income Attributable to Common Stock $140 - $160 $215 - $235 $240 - $260 $155 - $165 Add back: Preferred Dividends 106 - 106 106 - 106 106 - 106 - Adj. Net Income Attributable to SWN 246 - 266 321 - 341 346 - 366 155 - 165 Add back: Provision for income taxes 154 - 167 201 - 213 217 - 229 97 - 103 Interest expense 20 - 25 20 - 25 20 - 25 10 - 20 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 1,185 - 1,195 1,185 - 1,195 1,185 - 1,195 54 - 56 Less: Preferred Dividends 106 - 106 106 - 106 106 - 106 - EBITDA $1,525 - $1,545 $1,645 - $1,665 $1,680 - $1,700 $325 - $335 3 Months Ended March 31, 12 Months Ended December 31, 2015 2014 2014 2013 2012(1) 2011 2010 2009(1) 2008 2007 ($ in millions) Net income (loss) $78 $194 $924 $704 ($707) 638 $604 ($37) $568 $221 Add back: Net interest expense 51 13 59 42 35 24 26 19 29 24 Provision (benefit) for income taxes 49 129 525 486 (443) 413 392 (16) 351 136 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 293 225 942 787 2,751 705 590 1,402 414 294 Less: Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives 21 62 130 21 (2) 6 10 (15) - - Adjusted EBITDA (2) $492 $623 $2,320 $1,998 $1,638 $1,774 $1,602 $1,383 $1,362 $675 35 EBITDA is defined as net income plus interest, income tax expense, depreciation, depletion and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA less gains and/or losses on derivatives (net of settlement). Southwestern has included information concerning EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA because they are used by certain investors as a measure of the ability of a company to service or incur indebtedness and because it is a financial measure commonly used in the energy industry. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income, net cash provided by operating activities or other income or cash flow data prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or as a measure of the company's profitability or liquidity. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, as defined above, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Net income is a financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The table below reconciles historical Adjusted EBITDA with historical net income. Explanation and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures: Adjusted EBITDA Forward-Looking Statement The table below reconciles forecasted Adjusted EBITDA with forecasted net income for 2015, assuming various NYMEX price scenarios and the corresponding estimated impact on the company's results for 2015, including current hedges in place: (1) Includes impact from full cost ceiling test impairment of our natural gas and oil properties. (2) As reported in the quarterly report filed with the SEC, this amount excludes the impact from preferred dividends. However, the guidance table below includes the impact of preferred dividends as part of EBITDA. (3) Excludes impacts from assets previously announced to be divested during 2015.