SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  36
THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY
JUDICIAL REVIEW
Which case established federal judicial review for
national gov’t?




Which case established judicial review for state law?
JUDICIAL REVIEW
Which case established federal judicial review for
national gov’t?

           Marbury v Madison


Which case established judicial review for state law?
JUDICIAL REVIEW
Which case established federal judicial review for
national gov’t?

           Marbury v Madison


Which case established judicial review for state law?
       Martin v Hunter’s Lessee
PRINCIPLES OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM
   Strict Constructionalist or Judicial Activist




Allow the decisions of other branches to stand                                             Use their power broadly to further justice
                                                                     http://thevoiceforschoolchoice.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/judicial-activism.jpg

 http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f327/jackgreen7/stahler0626.gif
PRINCIPLES OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Equal Justice Under The Law
  -everyone receives equal treatment

Due Process
  -application of the law in a fair manner
        (5th and 14th amendments)
  - types of due process
      procedural= certain procedures must be followed so that
                   individual freedom is guaranteed
      substantive= content of the law must be reasonable
PRINCIPLES OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Adversary System
  J = judge/jury who are passive decision makers
  P/D = prosecutor or plaintiff/defense who are advocates for
their “cause.”
PRINCIPLES OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Presumption of Innocence
   - not mentioned in the Constitution
   - rooted in English Common Law
   - Burden of proof is on the Prosecution

Justiciable Disputes
   - there must be “real harm”
   - case must be able to be settled as a matter of law
FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM
FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM
Types of cases
  criminal law - the gov’t charges an individual with violating
                 a specific law

  civil law - the court resolves a dispute b/w 2 or more
               people and defines the relationship b/w them
FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM
Federal Jurisdiction
 1. Subject matter
      - interpretation of the Constitution/fed laws
      - federal law or foreign treaty
      - admiralty or maritime law
      - bankruptcy
 2. Parties involved
     - foreign ambassadors, diplomats
     - two or more state gov’ts
     - US gov’t or agency
     - citizens of different states
     - state (citizen) & foreign country (citizen)
FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM
Federal Jurisdiction
 3. Concurrent Jurisdiction
      - cases that may be tried in either a state (they hear the
        majority of cases w/in the U.S.) or federal court such as when
        state and federal laws are broken
 4. Original Jurisdiction
     - the court where a case is first tried (in criminal cases will
     one judge and jury)
 5. Appellate Jurisdiction
     - may uphold, reverse, or modify lower court rulings (will
     have multiple judges)
THE STRUCTURE OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL
              SYSTEM
                         either state or as usual
                         - appellate
 appellate
 courts
courts of
original
jurisdiction          state
                      courts
FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM
Federal Court Structure - (original)
  District Courts (94) - does 90% of cases
    -trial courts of original jurisdiction for criminal & civil cases

     - grand jury (16-23) hears charges & issues indictments in
       cases with enough evidence

     - trial of original jurisdiction is before a petit jury (12)
       which renders a verdict
FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM
Court of International Trade
   - civil cases involving foreign business and imports
U.S. Claims Court                                damages/unlawful seizure
   - claims against US govt or its officials      of private property
U.S. Tax Court
   - disputes between citizens and the IRS
Territorial Courts
  - for Virgin Islands, N. Mariana and Guam
Court of the District of Columbia

Superior Court - trial court

Military Courts - courts of services, courts of military review,
court of veteran appeals
FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM
Federal Court Structure (Appellate)
                                          each contains q # of
Federal Court of Appeals (12)             districts courts (at least 1
                                          in each state - trial
  - divided into 12 circuits              courts) 90% of cases
                                          begin here
  - each circuit has from 5-27 judges &
    a SC justice assigned to it

  - only have appellate jurisdiction

  - can review cases and Independent Regulatory Agencies
   (FCC, SEC, etc.)
FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM




 Virginia is the 4th Circuit
FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  - hears cases from Claims Court, Court of International Trade,
    and U.S. Patent
  - appellate jurisdiction

Court of Military Appeals
 - reviews decisions of military courts

Courts of the District of Columbia
  - Court of Appeals - appellate jurisdiction
FEDERAL COURT JUDGES
FEDERAL COURT JUDGES
Constitutional Provisions
  - Article II: appointed by President with consent of Senate for
    life terms

  - Removal by impeachment for bribery, treason, or high crime
   complete list at       http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/topics_ji_bdy




Selection Process
   - President makes list (same judicial philosophy)

  - ABA & interest groups try to influence

  - Senate Judiciary Comm. holds hearings & recommends
    to Senate for full vote - very partisan process (very apparent with
    Roberts/Alito/Sotomayor nominations)
FEDERAL COURT JUDGES
FEDERAL COURT JUDGES
Politics of Selection
   - selection for lower federal courts has a long term effect on
     the judicial process

  - lower courts selection often gives broader influence for
    President than SC choices

Supreme Court Justice Selection
  - same selection process as lower courts
  - more political pressure and media
  - Chief Justice can be from current Court or new to the SC
SUPREME COURT ROLES
SUPREME COURT ROLES
Chief Justice -does not have to be current member of the
Supreme Court
   - Nominated by President, confirmed by Senate
   - Serves for life as long as on “good behavior”
   - Vote weighs the same
  - Ultimately decides which cases are heard (in a sense, this makes
   he makes the discuss list)

 Associate Justices (8)
  - sit and speak according to rank (seniority)

   - most junior justice is on the far right

  - in charge of a circuit
Ginsburg          Breyer
                     Roberts       Scalia


Alito                                       Sotomayor

Kennedy
                                            Thomas
Stevens
TODAY’S COURT
Stevens: Senior most (Ford, ’75) liberal

Scalia (Reagan, ’86) Conservative

Kennedy: (Reagan, ’86) swing bloc, Republican

Thomas (Bush, ’91) Conservative

Ginsburg: (Clinton, ’93) Liberal

Breyer: (Clinton, ’94) Liberal

Roberts: Chief Justice (Bush, ’05) Conservative

Sotomayor: junior most (Obama, ’09) Liberal

Alito: (Bush, ’06) Conservative
THE SUPREME COURT
THE SUPREME COURT
Types of cases
 Restriction on cases
   - must be live between 2 adversaries
   - must involve real harm
  - must be substantial federal question
  - no political questions - go back to Ex and Legisl.
  - use only cases sent
 - no enforcement power

 Original Jurisdiction (less than 1%)
  - involve a state or diplomatic question
THE SUPREME COURT
Appellate Jurisdiction
  1) cases on appeal where lower court has ruled on a
      constitutional question
  - accepted under the “rule of four”
  - most are dismissed (not accepted)
 2) - writ of certiorari is the main route to SC and is an order
     from a lower court asking for a case to be handed up for
     review
   - certification appeals heard from Dist Ct b/c of importance
    they skip middle tier (U.S. v Nixon)
THE SUPREME COURT
Selection of cases

Discuss list made up of:
  - Chief Justice’s suggested cases from cert. requests and added
    to by other justices
 - made up first by justices’ law clerks
 - rejected require no reason for refusal - just say cert “denied”
 - rule of four for discussion
 - final cases selected by justices becomes the Orders list or
   docket
THE SUPREME COURT
Decision Process

Per Curiam these cases are decided w/o oral arguments

Full Consideration
 -briefs are filed by lawyers involved as well as amicus curiae or
  friends of the court (interested parties)

 - oral arguments allow each side 30 minutes w/ questioning
   by the judges

 - Friday Conferences discussion of cases & vote where only a
   simple majority (5-4) is necessary

 - votes based on precedent & rule of law
THE SUPREME COURT
Writing the Opinion

Written announcement of the Court’s opinion (delivered in the
spring)

Types

 - unanimous (9-0)
 - majority: expresses the views of the majority when the Court
             is divided
 -concurring: agree with the majority but for different legal
               reasons
 - dissenting: those not in agreement with majority state why
THE SUPREME COURT
Writers

 - Chief Justice writes if he is in majority or may assign to
   another Justice

 - Chief Justice writes is he is in the minority or may assign

 - Writers circulate drafts which are commented on with much
   compromising

 - occasionally justices will change sides which might change
   final decision
THE SUPREME COURT
Factors that influence decisions and policy

  - the law and the Constitution

  - Judicial Philosophy of the justices
    - activism - should make bold policy decisions and use
                 the cases to chart new constitutional ground

  - restraint - play a minimal policymaking role and leave
                policy to the legislative branch

-Relationships among the Justices (can be seen in number of
concurring & dissenting opinions)
THE SUPREME COURT
Factors that influence decisions and policy (cont)

  - Role of the Chief Justice

  - Social Forces: courts are influenced by values and beliefs of
     the times

  - Other branches of gov’t: through Presidential appointments
     and Congressional legislation aimed at repealing court
     decisions (i.e. Flag Protection Act after Texas v Johnson)
THE SUPREME COURT
Reading of the Opinion

 - Read in Court on special days - usually from April to June or
   July

 - Majority opinion writers delivers summary as do dissenters


 - Opinions released to the media

 - Usually save the most controversial for the last

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Judicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch IntroJudicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch IntroMelissa
 
Understanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courtsUnderstanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courtssevans-idaho
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branchrcambou
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchDan Hess
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branchdficker
 
The American legal system: An overview
The American legal system: An overviewThe American legal system: An overview
The American legal system: An overviewDan Kennedy
 
Fed cts what they do
Fed cts what they doFed cts what they do
Fed cts what they dosevans-idaho
 
Govt 2305-Ch_13
Govt 2305-Ch_13Govt 2305-Ch_13
Govt 2305-Ch_13Rick Fair
 
Ap government the_federal_court_system_review
Ap government the_federal_court_system_reviewAp government the_federal_court_system_review
Ap government the_federal_court_system_reviewjtoma84
 
The Federal Court System
The Federal Court SystemThe Federal Court System
The Federal Court SystemChris Thomas
 
Federal court system lecture
Federal court system lectureFederal court system lecture
Federal court system lectureEthosDebate
 
Judicial branch
Judicial branchJudicial branch
Judicial branchsmkirsch
 

Tendances (18)

Judiciary ppt
Judiciary pptJudiciary ppt
Judiciary ppt
 
US legal orientation
US legal orientationUS legal orientation
US legal orientation
 
Judicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch IntroJudicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch Intro
 
Understanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courtsUnderstanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courts
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
 
The American legal system: An overview
The American legal system: An overviewThe American legal system: An overview
The American legal system: An overview
 
Fed cts what they do
Fed cts what they doFed cts what they do
Fed cts what they do
 
The Federal Court System
The Federal Court SystemThe Federal Court System
The Federal Court System
 
Govt 2305-Ch_13
Govt 2305-Ch_13Govt 2305-Ch_13
Govt 2305-Ch_13
 
Federal courts
Federal courtsFederal courts
Federal courts
 
Judicial Branch
Judicial BranchJudicial Branch
Judicial Branch
 
The American Legal System
The American Legal SystemThe American Legal System
The American Legal System
 
Ap government the_federal_court_system_review
Ap government the_federal_court_system_reviewAp government the_federal_court_system_review
Ap government the_federal_court_system_review
 
The Federal Court System
The Federal Court SystemThe Federal Court System
The Federal Court System
 
Federal court system lecture
Federal court system lectureFederal court system lecture
Federal court system lecture
 
Judicial branch
Judicial branchJudicial branch
Judicial branch
 

Similaire à Federal Judiciary Keynote

American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13
American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13 American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13
American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13 d2suarez
 
The Court System
The Court SystemThe Court System
The Court Systemtspeck7
 
Federal Courts (8.1&2)
Federal Courts (8.1&2)Federal Courts (8.1&2)
Federal Courts (8.1&2)Matthew Caggia
 
AP Review
AP ReviewAP Review
AP Reviewjtoma84
 
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008Christopher Rice
 
The Court System Federal and State | David Ford Avon Ct
The Court System Federal and State | David Ford Avon CtThe Court System Federal and State | David Ford Avon Ct
The Court System Federal and State | David Ford Avon CtDavid Ford Avon Ct
 
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Fall 2008
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Fall 2008PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Fall 2008
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Fall 2008Christopher Rice
 
Lower federal courts
Lower federal courtsLower federal courts
Lower federal courtsMs_Allen
 
Federal Courts
Federal CourtsFederal Courts
Federal Courtsprofseitz
 
Top of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docx
Top of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docxTop of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docx
Top of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docxedwardmarivel
 
Section 4 & 5 of the Judicial Branch
Section 4 & 5 of the Judicial BranchSection 4 & 5 of the Judicial Branch
Section 4 & 5 of the Judicial Branchadutcher
 
Wk1 1 u.s. legal system
Wk1 1 u.s. legal systemWk1 1 u.s. legal system
Wk1 1 u.s. legal systemSungho Cho
 
Chapter 18 presentation
Chapter 18 presentationChapter 18 presentation
Chapter 18 presentationkrobinette
 

Similaire à Federal Judiciary Keynote (20)

American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13
American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13 American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13
American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13
 
Day 13 notes
Day 13 notesDay 13 notes
Day 13 notes
 
The Court System
The Court SystemThe Court System
The Court System
 
The Federal Judiciary
The Federal JudiciaryThe Federal Judiciary
The Federal Judiciary
 
Judicial Branch.pptx
Judicial Branch.pptxJudicial Branch.pptx
Judicial Branch.pptx
 
Federal Courts (8.1&2)
Federal Courts (8.1&2)Federal Courts (8.1&2)
Federal Courts (8.1&2)
 
AP Review
AP ReviewAP Review
AP Review
 
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Summer 2008
 
The Court System Federal and State | David Ford Avon Ct
The Court System Federal and State | David Ford Avon CtThe Court System Federal and State | David Ford Avon Ct
The Court System Federal and State | David Ford Avon Ct
 
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Fall 2008
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Fall 2008PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Fall 2008
PS 101 The Federal Judiciary Fall 2008
 
Lower federal courts
Lower federal courtsLower federal courts
Lower federal courts
 
Federal Courts
Federal CourtsFederal Courts
Federal Courts
 
Top of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docx
Top of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docxTop of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docx
Top of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docx
 
Ch03
Ch03Ch03
Ch03
 
Chapter 4 Condensed
Chapter 4 CondensedChapter 4 Condensed
Chapter 4 Condensed
 
Judiciary
JudiciaryJudiciary
Judiciary
 
Section 4 & 5 of the Judicial Branch
Section 4 & 5 of the Judicial BranchSection 4 & 5 of the Judicial Branch
Section 4 & 5 of the Judicial Branch
 
Judicial Power
Judicial PowerJudicial Power
Judicial Power
 
Wk1 1 u.s. legal system
Wk1 1 u.s. legal systemWk1 1 u.s. legal system
Wk1 1 u.s. legal system
 
Chapter 18 presentation
Chapter 18 presentationChapter 18 presentation
Chapter 18 presentation
 

Plus de Molly Lynde

Resume Molly Lynde Spring 2015
Resume Molly Lynde Spring 2015Resume Molly Lynde Spring 2015
Resume Molly Lynde Spring 2015Molly Lynde
 
Gov't foundations ii
Gov't foundations iiGov't foundations ii
Gov't foundations iiMolly Lynde
 
Gov't foundations iii0
Gov't foundations iii0Gov't foundations iii0
Gov't foundations iii0Molly Lynde
 
Gov't foundations0
Gov't foundations0Gov't foundations0
Gov't foundations0Molly Lynde
 
Comparing gov'ts
Comparing gov'tsComparing gov'ts
Comparing gov'tsMolly Lynde
 
World in 1500 asia 2011 2012
World in 1500 asia 2011 2012World in 1500 asia 2011 2012
World in 1500 asia 2011 2012Molly Lynde
 
World in 1500 trade routes 2011 2012
World in 1500 trade routes 2011 2012World in 1500 trade routes 2011 2012
World in 1500 trade routes 2011 2012Molly Lynde
 
World in 1500 ottoman
World in 1500 ottomanWorld in 1500 ottoman
World in 1500 ottomanMolly Lynde
 
Napoleon bonaparte hero or tyrant?1
Napoleon bonaparte  hero or tyrant?1Napoleon bonaparte  hero or tyrant?1
Napoleon bonaparte hero or tyrant?1Molly Lynde
 
World religion today
World religion todayWorld religion today
World religion todayMolly Lynde
 
World in 1500 details 5 empires
World in 1500 details 5 empiresWorld in 1500 details 5 empires
World in 1500 details 5 empiresMolly Lynde
 
World at 1500 intro empires and trade patterns
World at 1500  intro empires and trade patternsWorld at 1500  intro empires and trade patterns
World at 1500 intro empires and trade patternsMolly Lynde
 
Discovering maps
Discovering mapsDiscovering maps
Discovering mapsMolly Lynde
 
Merc 10 15-09 m lynde
Merc 10 15-09 m lyndeMerc 10 15-09 m lynde
Merc 10 15-09 m lyndeMolly Lynde
 
Mash Up In Between Wars
Mash Up In Between WarsMash Up In Between Wars
Mash Up In Between WarsMolly Lynde
 
Imperialism Japan
Imperialism JapanImperialism Japan
Imperialism JapanMolly Lynde
 

Plus de Molly Lynde (20)

Resume Molly Lynde Spring 2015
Resume Molly Lynde Spring 2015Resume Molly Lynde Spring 2015
Resume Molly Lynde Spring 2015
 
Gov't foundations ii
Gov't foundations iiGov't foundations ii
Gov't foundations ii
 
Gov't foundations iii0
Gov't foundations iii0Gov't foundations iii0
Gov't foundations iii0
 
Gov't foundations0
Gov't foundations0Gov't foundations0
Gov't foundations0
 
Comparing gov'ts
Comparing gov'tsComparing gov'ts
Comparing gov'ts
 
Baker v carr
Baker v carrBaker v carr
Baker v carr
 
World in 1500 asia 2011 2012
World in 1500 asia 2011 2012World in 1500 asia 2011 2012
World in 1500 asia 2011 2012
 
World in 1500 trade routes 2011 2012
World in 1500 trade routes 2011 2012World in 1500 trade routes 2011 2012
World in 1500 trade routes 2011 2012
 
World in 1500 ottoman
World in 1500 ottomanWorld in 1500 ottoman
World in 1500 ottoman
 
Napoleon bonaparte hero or tyrant?1
Napoleon bonaparte  hero or tyrant?1Napoleon bonaparte  hero or tyrant?1
Napoleon bonaparte hero or tyrant?1
 
World religion today
World religion todayWorld religion today
World religion today
 
World in 1500 details 5 empires
World in 1500 details 5 empiresWorld in 1500 details 5 empires
World in 1500 details 5 empires
 
World at 1500 intro empires and trade patterns
World at 1500  intro empires and trade patternsWorld at 1500  intro empires and trade patterns
World at 1500 intro empires and trade patterns
 
Wh day 1
Wh day 1Wh day 1
Wh day 1
 
Discovering maps
Discovering mapsDiscovering maps
Discovering maps
 
Merc 10 15-09 m lynde
Merc 10 15-09 m lyndeMerc 10 15-09 m lynde
Merc 10 15-09 m lynde
 
Cold war
Cold warCold war
Cold war
 
Us cold war0
Us cold war0Us cold war0
Us cold war0
 
Mash Up In Between Wars
Mash Up In Between WarsMash Up In Between Wars
Mash Up In Between Wars
 
Imperialism Japan
Imperialism JapanImperialism Japan
Imperialism Japan
 

Federal Judiciary Keynote

  • 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW Which case established federal judicial review for national gov’t? Which case established judicial review for state law?
  • 3. JUDICIAL REVIEW Which case established federal judicial review for national gov’t? Marbury v Madison Which case established judicial review for state law?
  • 4. JUDICIAL REVIEW Which case established federal judicial review for national gov’t? Marbury v Madison Which case established judicial review for state law? Martin v Hunter’s Lessee
  • 5. PRINCIPLES OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Strict Constructionalist or Judicial Activist Allow the decisions of other branches to stand Use their power broadly to further justice http://thevoiceforschoolchoice.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/judicial-activism.jpg http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f327/jackgreen7/stahler0626.gif
  • 6. PRINCIPLES OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Equal Justice Under The Law -everyone receives equal treatment Due Process -application of the law in a fair manner (5th and 14th amendments) - types of due process procedural= certain procedures must be followed so that individual freedom is guaranteed substantive= content of the law must be reasonable
  • 7. PRINCIPLES OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Adversary System J = judge/jury who are passive decision makers P/D = prosecutor or plaintiff/defense who are advocates for their “cause.”
  • 8. PRINCIPLES OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Presumption of Innocence - not mentioned in the Constitution - rooted in English Common Law - Burden of proof is on the Prosecution Justiciable Disputes - there must be “real harm” - case must be able to be settled as a matter of law
  • 10. FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM Types of cases criminal law - the gov’t charges an individual with violating a specific law civil law - the court resolves a dispute b/w 2 or more people and defines the relationship b/w them
  • 11. FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM Federal Jurisdiction 1. Subject matter - interpretation of the Constitution/fed laws - federal law or foreign treaty - admiralty or maritime law - bankruptcy 2. Parties involved - foreign ambassadors, diplomats - two or more state gov’ts - US gov’t or agency - citizens of different states - state (citizen) & foreign country (citizen)
  • 12. FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM Federal Jurisdiction 3. Concurrent Jurisdiction - cases that may be tried in either a state (they hear the majority of cases w/in the U.S.) or federal court such as when state and federal laws are broken 4. Original Jurisdiction - the court where a case is first tried (in criminal cases will one judge and jury) 5. Appellate Jurisdiction - may uphold, reverse, or modify lower court rulings (will have multiple judges)
  • 13. THE STRUCTURE OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM either state or as usual - appellate appellate courts courts of original jurisdiction state courts
  • 14. FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM Federal Court Structure - (original) District Courts (94) - does 90% of cases -trial courts of original jurisdiction for criminal & civil cases - grand jury (16-23) hears charges & issues indictments in cases with enough evidence - trial of original jurisdiction is before a petit jury (12) which renders a verdict
  • 15. FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM Court of International Trade - civil cases involving foreign business and imports U.S. Claims Court damages/unlawful seizure - claims against US govt or its officials of private property U.S. Tax Court - disputes between citizens and the IRS Territorial Courts - for Virgin Islands, N. Mariana and Guam Court of the District of Columbia Superior Court - trial court Military Courts - courts of services, courts of military review, court of veteran appeals
  • 16. FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM Federal Court Structure (Appellate) each contains q # of Federal Court of Appeals (12) districts courts (at least 1 in each state - trial - divided into 12 circuits courts) 90% of cases begin here - each circuit has from 5-27 judges & a SC justice assigned to it - only have appellate jurisdiction - can review cases and Independent Regulatory Agencies (FCC, SEC, etc.)
  • 17. FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM Virginia is the 4th Circuit
  • 18. FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - hears cases from Claims Court, Court of International Trade, and U.S. Patent - appellate jurisdiction Court of Military Appeals - reviews decisions of military courts Courts of the District of Columbia - Court of Appeals - appellate jurisdiction
  • 20. FEDERAL COURT JUDGES Constitutional Provisions - Article II: appointed by President with consent of Senate for life terms - Removal by impeachment for bribery, treason, or high crime complete list at http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/topics_ji_bdy Selection Process - President makes list (same judicial philosophy) - ABA & interest groups try to influence - Senate Judiciary Comm. holds hearings & recommends to Senate for full vote - very partisan process (very apparent with Roberts/Alito/Sotomayor nominations)
  • 22. FEDERAL COURT JUDGES Politics of Selection - selection for lower federal courts has a long term effect on the judicial process - lower courts selection often gives broader influence for President than SC choices Supreme Court Justice Selection - same selection process as lower courts - more political pressure and media - Chief Justice can be from current Court or new to the SC
  • 24. SUPREME COURT ROLES Chief Justice -does not have to be current member of the Supreme Court - Nominated by President, confirmed by Senate - Serves for life as long as on “good behavior” - Vote weighs the same - Ultimately decides which cases are heard (in a sense, this makes he makes the discuss list) Associate Justices (8) - sit and speak according to rank (seniority) - most junior justice is on the far right - in charge of a circuit
  • 25. Ginsburg Breyer Roberts Scalia Alito Sotomayor Kennedy Thomas Stevens
  • 26. TODAY’S COURT Stevens: Senior most (Ford, ’75) liberal Scalia (Reagan, ’86) Conservative Kennedy: (Reagan, ’86) swing bloc, Republican Thomas (Bush, ’91) Conservative Ginsburg: (Clinton, ’93) Liberal Breyer: (Clinton, ’94) Liberal Roberts: Chief Justice (Bush, ’05) Conservative Sotomayor: junior most (Obama, ’09) Liberal Alito: (Bush, ’06) Conservative
  • 28. THE SUPREME COURT Types of cases Restriction on cases - must be live between 2 adversaries - must involve real harm - must be substantial federal question - no political questions - go back to Ex and Legisl. - use only cases sent - no enforcement power Original Jurisdiction (less than 1%) - involve a state or diplomatic question
  • 29. THE SUPREME COURT Appellate Jurisdiction 1) cases on appeal where lower court has ruled on a constitutional question - accepted under the “rule of four” - most are dismissed (not accepted) 2) - writ of certiorari is the main route to SC and is an order from a lower court asking for a case to be handed up for review - certification appeals heard from Dist Ct b/c of importance they skip middle tier (U.S. v Nixon)
  • 30. THE SUPREME COURT Selection of cases Discuss list made up of: - Chief Justice’s suggested cases from cert. requests and added to by other justices - made up first by justices’ law clerks - rejected require no reason for refusal - just say cert “denied” - rule of four for discussion - final cases selected by justices becomes the Orders list or docket
  • 31. THE SUPREME COURT Decision Process Per Curiam these cases are decided w/o oral arguments Full Consideration -briefs are filed by lawyers involved as well as amicus curiae or friends of the court (interested parties) - oral arguments allow each side 30 minutes w/ questioning by the judges - Friday Conferences discussion of cases & vote where only a simple majority (5-4) is necessary - votes based on precedent & rule of law
  • 32. THE SUPREME COURT Writing the Opinion Written announcement of the Court’s opinion (delivered in the spring) Types - unanimous (9-0) - majority: expresses the views of the majority when the Court is divided -concurring: agree with the majority but for different legal reasons - dissenting: those not in agreement with majority state why
  • 33. THE SUPREME COURT Writers - Chief Justice writes if he is in majority or may assign to another Justice - Chief Justice writes is he is in the minority or may assign - Writers circulate drafts which are commented on with much compromising - occasionally justices will change sides which might change final decision
  • 34. THE SUPREME COURT Factors that influence decisions and policy - the law and the Constitution - Judicial Philosophy of the justices - activism - should make bold policy decisions and use the cases to chart new constitutional ground - restraint - play a minimal policymaking role and leave policy to the legislative branch -Relationships among the Justices (can be seen in number of concurring & dissenting opinions)
  • 35. THE SUPREME COURT Factors that influence decisions and policy (cont) - Role of the Chief Justice - Social Forces: courts are influenced by values and beliefs of the times - Other branches of gov’t: through Presidential appointments and Congressional legislation aimed at repealing court decisions (i.e. Flag Protection Act after Texas v Johnson)
  • 36. THE SUPREME COURT Reading of the Opinion - Read in Court on special days - usually from April to June or July - Majority opinion writers delivers summary as do dissenters - Opinions released to the media - Usually save the most controversial for the last

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. 1816 - loyalist land in n neck of va - state ruled us treaty concerning loyalist property confiscated during Am Rev meant va could supercede treaty and keep land - sc said no - reprimmanded back to va -they said sc couldn’t review state law- sc said yes they could
  2. 1816 - loyalist land in n neck of va - state ruled us treaty concerning loyalist property confiscated during Am Rev meant va could supercede treaty and keep land - sc said no - reprimmanded back to va -they said sc couldn’t review state law- sc said yes they could
  3. SC - SC - A-SC-SC-A
  4. 5th protects citizen’s life liberty property w due process from fed gov’t 14th extends 5th by ensuring “equal protection under the law” due process- guards indiv rights from infringement by state or fed gov substantive asks if law itself is fair
  5. real harm- someone must have been “wronged” in order for there to b a case i.e. Plessy V Furgerson- Plessy got on the train to B segregated not a matter of arguing ideologies though that may come into play
  6. criminal - warrants a punishment b/c crime was committed (murder, burglery) civil- no charge of criminality- no law violated (divorce)
  7. explain admiralty Snipers - both, why state of Va? death penalty OK city bombers - that was in a federal building. Tried in Co.
  8. *concurrent also consider snipers original - power to hear/decide case for the first time appellate - power of higher court to correct decision of lower court
  9. Provide note page/diagram here specialized courts - claims of $ damages against US gov’t, unlawful seizure of private propety by gov’t
  10. indictments -formal accusation of a crime (no guilt or innocence). Enough evidence to have a trial b/c possib of committed crime exists verdict- guilt or innocent
  11. “riding the circuit” justices visiting circuit courts considers gay marriage cases (Ca, Vt, Ma)
  12. for federal court - only 12 impeachments * Senatorial courtesy ABA influence - send message support/opposition Harriet Miers
  13. lower fed court judges are also chosen for life, hear more cases than SC b/c most cases are decided at the lower level
  14. when on circuit they don’t usually sit on courts but can stay executions, grant bail, etc
  15. Alito - generally views restrictions on Pres power as unconstitutional, narrow view of defendants rts, church state restrictions, AS LAWYER IN 3rd Dist Ct Appeals -in Planned Phood v Casey upheld prov of Pa law req spousal notification - SC overruled this decisin in ’91, citing it as undue burden
  16. most SC cases are heard on appeal
  17. writ of certiorari must come from “US Court of Appeals” or state court of last resort. Must involve a federal question
  18. see diagram
  19. show amicus curiae