1. Juggling Act: Re-planning & Building an ObservatoryâŠ. Simultaneously!!!! Eddie Zavala â SOFIA Deputy Program Manager Patricia Daws â SOFIA Program Business Manager February 10, 2011 Used with permission
2. Purpose This presentation discusses how the SOFIA Program, in the midst of a re-plan and system development phase, executed multiple simultaneous planning and business initiatives/requirements and integrated them into improved project management processes without impacting technical progress. Feb 10, 2011 2 2011 PM Challenge
3. Overview The SOFIA Mission Before the Re-plan The Juggling Act Managing the Chaos Engage Existing and New Jugglers The Results KEY BREAKTHROUGHS Conclusion Feb 10, 2011 3 2011 PM Challenge
20. Program Background The predecessor to SOFIA, the Kupier Airborne Observatory (KAO), was decommissioned in 1995 to start SOFIA SOFIA established as a 80/20 partnership between US and Germany (NASA and DLR) NASA receives 80% of available science time, DLR 20% Initial program model, was contractor led with NASA oversight (privatized) Program slated for cancellation in the spring of 2006 Agency approves program for continued funding in the fall of 2006 Program restructured Government led contractor supported Two projects, Science and Platform Science at Ames Research Center Platform at Dryden Flight Research Center Feb 10, 2011 10 2011 PM Challenge
22. Incremental / Phased Development Approach Status - Sept 2007 Complete Status of 7 Science Instruments Varies Dependent on the Instrument Remaining Decomposition & Definition Integration & Verification Decomposition & Definition Integration & Verification Partially Complete Integration & Verification Decomposition & Definition Fab. & Assemble Fab. & Assemble Decomposition & Definition Mission Control & Communications System (MCCS) Cavity Door Drive System (CDDS) Integration & Verification Decomposition & Definition Integration & Verification Decomposition & Definition Integration & Verification Rework Required Fab. & Assemble Fab. & Assemble Fab. & Assemble Fab. & Assemble Cavity Environmental Control System (CECS) A/C Modification Telescope Assembly Science Instruments (SI) Cavity Door System (CDS) Full Operational Capability TA Characterization & Shared Purpose Closed Door Open Door Early Science Functional/Ferry User Need ÎSAR ÎSAR ÎSAR ÎSAR ÎSAR Original Requirements Baseline Data Review Data Review Data Review Data Review Data Review Requirements Re-Baseline SAR Flt Test Flt Test Flt Test ORD Flt Test Flt Test SRR FRR ÎSRR ÎSRR ÎSRR FRR FRR FRR ORR ÎSRR Data Review Ground Test ÎORD Ground Test Ground Test Ground Test Flt Test Ground Test ÎPDR PDR FRR ÎPDR Ground Test ÎCDR ÎCDR ÎCDR ÎCDR CDR CDS/CDDS/CECS MCCS Build #1 A/C Modification TA/CECS Instrumentation CECS Improvements Final MCCS/CECS-LN2 Science Instruments MCCS for Early Science Early Science Instruments Final Upgrades 12 Segment 0 Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment 3 Segment 4
25. Introducing the Juggler⊠Program Restructure Incremental Observatory Development System Engineering & Integration The SOFIA Program Office Feb 10, 2011 15 2011 PM Challenge
26. Build a World-Class Observatory Inter-leaving Development and Early Science (phased development approach) Implementing the New Program Structure Science Community Expectations Integrating the New Team Systems Engineering & Integration Deploy working observatory capabilities and services Feb 10, 2011 16 2011 PM Challenge
27. New Challenges Can you handle a few more balls in the air? Subsystem development schedule delays MCCS Development for Early Science CDDS Technology Development Issues Feb 10, 2011 17 2011 PM Challenge
28. Working harder, but itâs all under control Feb 10, 2011 18 2011 PM Challenge
30. The âfunâ begins⊠Get to the Initiation of Science Flights Technical Re-plan Clear the flight envelope GAO Large Program Assessment/Audit Standing Review Board (SRB) (but donât drop any of the other balls!!) Feb 10, 2011 20 2011 PM Challenge
31. And the fun keeps comingâŠ. Joint Cost & Schedule Confidence Level (JCL) Earned Value Implementation IG Pre Audit, Formal Audit, Recommendations (but donât drop any of the other balls!!) Feb 10, 2011 21 2011 PM Challenge
34. Take a timeoutâŠ. What added value can we get from these new requirements? Whatâs feasible? Whatâs urgent? What donât we know? Whatâs important? How are we going to get this done ?! Feb 10, 2011 24 2011 PM Challenge
35. Managing the Chaos⊠StrategizeâŠ.before you add more jugglers to the team, or even accept the balls Sequence the ballsâŠdonât try to accept them all at once Leverage skill and experience of existing jugglers⊠Learn new âjuggling skillsâ âJugglersâ and âjuggling skillsâ equate to process improvement, functional groups, NOT additional staff Feb 10, 2011 25 2011 PM Challenge
45. Juggler #2 The Observatory IPT Owns the key skills to keep the act goingâŠdeveloping the observatory Technical Coordination Requirements Management System Engineering & Integration Mission Preparedness & Execution Technical Risk Management Feb 10, 2011 30 2011 PM Challenge
46. Juggler #3 CRM has a new key skillâŠthe THREAT DATABASE Makes it easier for team to identify threats âon the flyâ âany issue that keeps you up at nightâ Threats linked to milestones with quantified cost / schedule impacts Improved Program risk identification Continuous Risk Management Feb 10, 2011 31 2011 PM Challenge
48. Communication of Concerns âSignificantâ Risks tracked at Program Level Program Science Platform Traceability of concerns maintained from top to bottom Threats âroll upâ into formal Risks Threats Concerns are collected at the team level⊠SOFIA Team Concerns Feb 10, 2011 33 2011 PM Challenge
49. Risks, Threats, and the JCL Concerns from SOFIA Team The threat database proved to be a good predictor of likely schedule impacts and helped focus mitigations The threat database is used to populate the JCL risk register and the Risk Action Matrix at the Project and Program Level Feb 10, 2011 34 2011 PM Challenge
50. Two Coordinated Jugglers Threat DB Synchronized by tossing the Threat Database ball back and forth Continuous Risk Management Observatory IPT Feb 10, 2011 35 2011 PM Challenge
51. Juggler #4 Tune up key juggling skills to manage more balls in the air at one time By teaming with other Jugglers, tossing balls back and forth, sharing the load⊠Leverage threat database for cost/risk integration (toss ball back and forth with CRM &Observatory IPT) Leverage existing budget data for schedule/cost integration (coordinating with SPO) Acquiring JCL implementation knowledge Integrated technical and reserve management strategy Integrated Schedule & Budget Feb 10, 2011 36 2011 PM Challenge
53. Three Coordinated Jugglers Threat DB Schedule Synchronized by tossing the Threat Database and Schedule balls back and forth Continuous Risk Management Observatory IPT Integrated Schedule / Budget Feb 10, 2011 38 2011 PM Challenge
54. Bring the New Juggler#5âŠ. Integrates cross-functional knowledge to create a new skill Integrated Master Schedule with: Tie to Threat Database via JCL Risk Registry Resource Loaded Tasks JCL plug-in Leverage JCL for EVM Implementation Institutionalize value-added processes and analyses Ensure continual improvement and sustaining processes through coordination with other jugglers Schedule IPT Feb 10, 2011 39 2011 PM Challenge
55. Program-wide Coordination Threat DB IMS Continuous Risk Management Observatory IPT Integrated Schedule / Budget Schedule IPT SOFIA Program Office Feb 10, 2011 40 2011 PM Challenge
66. Initiation of Science Flights on Nov 30 / Dec 1, 2010!!!Feb 10, 2011 42 2011 PM Challenge
67. Key Breakthroughs Key decisions made to set down ballsâŠnot drop them Leveraged the results of technical re-plan Re-sequenced SRB appropriately Program indexed with an interim baseline Enhanced CRM processes Threat database construct Linking threats to specific activities, identify cost and schedule impact Use threat database as primary source for JCL inputs Feeder to traditional risk management â augment, donât replace Integrated Master Schedule Resources, threats, JCL/EVM enabled Finding a way to dissolve traditional stovepipes Key relationships (Business Manager, CE, SPO, PMsâŠ) Integrated products that allow for cross-functional use and enabled new teams to implement new requirements Feb 10, 2011 43 2011 PM Challenge
76. SOFIA First Light Image â JupiterMay 26, 2010 SOFIA infrared image (5.4, 24.2, and 37.1 ïm) Feb 10, 2011 52 2011 PM Challenge
77. SOFIA First Light Image â M82 SOFIA infrared image (19.7, 31.5, and 37.1 ïm) Feb 10, 2011 53 2011 PM Challenge
78. Initiation of Science FlightsNov 1 â Dec 1, 2010 Feb 10, 2011 54 2011 PM Challenge
Editor's Notes
Everything based on the same Resource loaded IMS and Threat Database. Updates to the IMS generated by other functions/processes automatically available for use in JCL, PPBE, etc. Updates to threat database easily reflected in reserves liens through a simple report of cost impacts. Changes to schedule can be used to mitigate threats/risks. JCL capability-if kept current- can provide reports identifying highest cost or schedule items, and can be fed back to mitigations.
Struture, graphic of general observatoryMission description for âwhy SOFIAâWe were a program in transition and trying to implement restructured program at the same timeâŠ.making it up as we go. Initial condition did not include steady state operations OR pre-development formulation. Reverse engineering of design, phased approach to get to early science, including ongoing requirements review. Classical SE&I tasks/requirements. If Ron & Laura presenting after, give a pitch.Category 1 Project, on GAO Large Scale Projects List (9 of 15 that experienced significant delays)âŠ.subject to a lot of external scrutiny smaller projects may not normally face.