This disclaimer statement from Royal Dutch Shell contains forward-looking statements about the company's financial condition, operations, and businesses. It warns that several factors could cause actual results to differ materially from what is expressed in the forward-looking statements, including market risks, reserve estimates, environmental risks, economic conditions, and legal/regulatory changes. Over a dozen specific risk factors are identified that require ongoing evaluation. Readers are advised to consider all factors that could affect results as described in Shell's regulatory filings.

1. Disclaimer statement
This presentation contains forward-looking statements concerning the financial condition, results of operations and
businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be,
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on
management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements.
Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Royal Dutch Shell
to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and
assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as ‘‘anticipate’’,
‘‘believe’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘outlook’’, ‘‘probably’’, ‘‘project’’,
‘‘will’’, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘target’’, ‘‘risks’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘should’’ and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that
could affect the future operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those
expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this presentations, including (without limitation): (a) price
fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for the Group’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d)
drilling and production results; (e) reserve estimates; (f) loss of market and industry competition; (g) environmental and
physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and
successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and
countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including potential litigation
and regulatory effects arising from recategorisation of reserves; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various
countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with
governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs;
and (m) changes in trading conditions. All forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are expressly qualified
in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue
reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional factors that may affect future results are contained in Royal Dutch Shell’s
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (available at www.shell.com/investor and www.sec.gov ). These factors also
should be considered by the reader. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this presentation, 3
March 2010. Neither Royal Dutch Shell nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results
could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this
presentation.
1

2. 4 Factors determine CO2 Emissions
CO2 emissions =
Xx Xx
people GDP
person
energy
unit GDP
x unit energy
CO2
Only four factors govern the outcome, being:
• Population Number of people
• Standard of Living GDP per person
• Energy Intensity Energy per unit of GDP (efficiency of the economy)
• Carbon Intensity CO2 per unit of energy (reflects the energy source)

4. Decarbonisation Pathways, incl Gas
Emission reduction (CO2 / unit energy)
Further shift to Nuclear Renewables Bio-products Carbon capture
natural gas power and storage
Energy conservation and efficiency (energy / unit GDP)
Mass Road Buildings Low energy Doing things
transportation transport appliances differently

5. Bright Future for Gas Supply
The Guardian: UK’s carbon emission dropped by
2% in 2008
2 Feb 2010
“According to the Department of Energy and Climate Change, the
decrease is the result of continuing to switch
CERA: Storage levels higher than the from coal to natural gas for making electricity,
combined with lower consumption of fossil fuels in industry and
previous year
transport.”
CERA reported recently that “the European Gas
Coordination Group met in January 2010, noting that
storage levels were higher than in the previous year and
praising the industry for ensuring supply.”
5

6. A/S Gas : Abundant & Secure gas resource in Europe
NO:
109 TCF
UK:
49 TCF DK
2.1 TCF
DE
NL: 9 TCF
53 TCF
South
Stream
6
Source: CERA

7. Europe is surrounded by large gas reserves
accessible to its market
?
Russia:
45 TCM
Indigenous:
6 TCM
Trinidad
&Tobag South
o
Stream
1 TCM
Nigeria
Caspian &
4 TCM
Middle East:
86 TCM
North
Africa
7 TCM
7
Source: CERA

8. Unconventional Gas Global Distribution of GIIP -
US National Petroleum Council
5,485 TCF
1200 TCF
8,228 TCF
5,094 TCF
3,370 TCF
3,448 TCF
1,097 TCF
3,487 TCF
8

9. “Natural gas will play a key role whatever the policy landscape…”
2009 World Energy Outlook,
IEA
All three of CERA’s
scenarios show natural gas
growing or maintaining its
share of Europe’s total
primary energy demand
9
Source: CERA

10. Gas is Core to the Clean Energy Solution
10
Source: Eurostat data, Shell analysis

11. Shell is a major contributor to gas supply into Europe
START-UP DATE FIRST LNG MARCH 09, TRAIN 2 ONSTREAM MAY 09
2008
2009
GJOA
2010+
CORRIB
HALFDAN PHASE IV
KASHAGAN
SAKHALIN II
QATARGAS 4 PEARL GTL
GUMUSUT-KAKAP
AFAM
Nigeria LNG T6
GORGON
NWS T5 / ANGEL
PLUTO (WOODSIDE)
Start up 2007
Qatargas 4: 2010+
• MID YEAR RESULTS 2009 START UPS ADD 140 KBOE/D PEAK PRODUCTION
• ~1 MLN BOE/D UNDER CONSTRUCTION
KEY POST-FID PROJECTS
• PRE-FID OPTIONS FOR UPSTREAM GROWTH TO ~2020
11

12. Towards more power generation from Gas
• Current UK power generation is 40% gas driven
and 80% of UK homes utilise gas for heating
• World Gas supply equivalent to 150+ years of
current consumption
• Gas fired power, when compared to Coal :
- 50-70% less CO2 output
- 60% less capital intensive per MW installed
- Lower power generation costs compared to
other sources
- More flexible to deliver peak outputs
- Can be retrofitted to include CCS
12

13. GAS a prominent part of EU Energy Mix deserves EU
Policy support
• The Reality is - We need ALL fuels for some decades to
come
• Natural gas merits a prominent place in the EU energy
mix
• Gas is abundant, safe, less polluting, reliable
• Shell is committed to work with you to realise the full
potential for gas in Europe
13

14. 14