Design of gastroretentive bilayer floating films of propranolol hydrochloride...
Drug Excipient Compatibility: What FDA Wants to Know
1. Drug Excipient Compatibility:
What FDA Wants to Know
Case Study for Duloxetine HCl Delayed-Release Capsules
Naiqi Ya, Ph.D.
Division of Chemistry II
Office of Generic Drugs
FDA
1
2. Disclaimer
Opinions expressed in this presentation
are those of the speaker and do not
necessarily reflect the views or policies
of the FDA.
2
3. Outline
Why compatibility study is needed?
Duloxetine Hydrochloride and formulation
Observations in submissions
Suggestions
Summary
3
4. VERSED® Syrup Recall
Roche Laboratories is conducting a voluntary
Class I drug recall…, because of the potential
presence of a crystalline precipitate of an
insoluble complex of midazolam and
saccharin inside the bottle. The presence of
this precipitate causes a lack of uniformity in
the product and may result in the administration
of a super or sub-potent dose.
4
5. Why compatibility study is needed?
Required by ICH Q8R*:
“The compatibility of the drug substance with
excipients listed in 3.2.P.1 should be evaluated...”
Achieve acceptable drug product stability
Avoid to rely only on end-product testing,
which is considered high risk than using
quality by design (QbD)
5 * ICH Q8(R) Pharmaceutical Development, Section 2.1.1
6. Duloxetine Hydrochloride
(+)-(S)-N-methyl-3-(1-
naphthalenyloxy)-2-
O • HCl thiophenepropanami
S CH3 ne hydrochloride
N
H
• Acid labile compound that degrades to a highly toxic compound
1-naphthol
• Contain a secondary amine
6
7. Delayed-Release Formulation
Need an enteric polymer-coating to prevent the acid
degradation in the stomach
Commonly used polymers in an enteric coated
formulation:
– Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Acetate Succinate
(HPMCAS) and Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Phthalate
(HPMCP)
– Methyl acrylate - methacrylic acid copolymers
7
8. Issues with HPMCAS & HPMCP
May accelerate degradation of duloxetine due to the free
acids contained in the polymers due to the free acids in
each polymer (allow up to 1% per USP).
React with the polymer degradation products to form
succinamide (left) and phthalamide (right) impurities*:
O OH
O O O O
S OH S
N N
CH3 O CH3
8 * Jansen, P.T., Oren, P.L., Kemp, C.A., Maple, S.R., and Baertschi, S.W. J. Pharm. Sci. 1998, 87, 81-85
9. Subcoat Layer
A subcoat layer should be used to separate the
duloxetine-containing layer and the enteric
coating*.
Sugar Sphere Enteric Coating Layer
Subcoat Layer
Finishing Layer
(optional) Duloxetine-containing layer
* 1) Jansen, P.T., Oren, P.L., Kemp, C.A., Maple, S.R., and Baertschi, S.W. J. Pharm. Sci. 1998, 87, 81-85
9 2) US Patent No. 5,508,276 and US Patent Application No. US 2009/00171121
10. Observations in Submissions
No discussion about the potential interaction of
duloxetine with the enteric coating polymers
No study for thickness of subcoat layer
No method developed or validated for the impurities
formed by the interaction of duloxetine with the
enteric coating polymers
No justification for the impurities acceptance criteria
10
11. Suggestions
For evaluating the potential interaction of
duloxetine with the enteric coating polymers:
– Analyzing excipients in formulation that:
may react with a secondary amine
may form free acid
– Analyzing aged and/or stressed drug product
– Searching scientific literature and patents
11
12. Suggestions
For evaluating the thickness of subcoat layer:
– Provide rationale for polymer selection
– Establish a thickness range for the subcoat layer
with supporting data
– Establish a target value for the commercial drug
product manufacturing process
– Establish an in-process test for the coating
uniformity
12
13. Suggestions
For developing or validating for impurity
method:
– Use known impurity/degradant standard or the
stressed samples
– Provide data to demonstrate a method is capable to
detect the impurities formed by the interaction of
duloxetine with the enteric coating polymers
13
14. Suggestions
For justifying impurities acceptance criteria (no
USP monograph available):
– ICH guidances
– Comparison to reference listed drug (RLD)
– Scientific literature
– Pharm/Tox Study
14
15. Summary
Identify drug excipient compatibility issues (drug
– excipient – packaging materials)
Justify drug product formulation design
Establish appropriate manufacturing process
parameters
Establish adequate quality controls (analytical
methods and acceptance criteria) for in-process
and finished product
15
16. Acknowledgment
Gary Buehler, Office Director
Lawrence Yu, Deputy Office Director for Science
Florence Fang, Division Director
Richard Adams, Deputy Division Director
16