SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  25
Dr.Ravi Prakash
Moderator –Dr Roopa Salwan
INTRODUCTION
• Recent registry and sub-study results have shown
  that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is safe
  and effective in patients with unprotected left main
  coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis.

• However, due to the lack of randomized clinical trials,
  the comparability of PCI with coronary artery bypass
  graft (CABG) remains uncertain.
PRECOMBAT Trial Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass
Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in
Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

 • DESIGN: a prospective, randomized clinical trial


 • OBJECTIVE: To compare PCI with sirolimus-eluting
     stents and CABG surgery for optimal revascularization of
     patients with ULMCA stenosis.

 • PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
     Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD, Asan Medical Center,
     Seoul, Korea
PATIENT FLOW
                      Enrolled Patients (N=1454)

             Randomized Cohort              CABG registry N=335
                  N=600                      PCI registry N=475
                                           Medication registry N=44
   Assigned CABG         Assigned PCI
       N=300                N=300
                                               1-year follow-up
    Treated CABG          Treated CABG
                                            CABG registry N=310
        N=248                 N=24
                                             PCI registry N=457
     Treated PCI           Treated PCI
                                           Medication registry N=41
        N=51                  N=276
   Treated medical       Treated medical
         N=1                   N=0
                                                  2-year follow-up
   1-year follow-up     1-year follow-up
        N=296                N=298             CABG registry N=259
                                                PCI registry N=289
   2-year follow-up        2-year F/U         Medication registry N=39
        N=266                N=270
MAJOR INCLUSION CRITERIA

•    18 years of age.
• Significant de novo ULMCA stenosis (>50%)
• Left main lesion and lesions outside ULMCA (if
    present) potentially comparably treatable with PCI
    and CABG.
• Objective evidence of ischemia or ischemic symptom
    with angina or NSTEMI
MAJOR EXCLUSION CRITERIA

 • Any contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy
 • Any previous PCI within 1 year
 • Previous CABG
 • Chronic total occlusion > 1
 • AMI within 1 week
 • Shock or LV EF < 30%
 • Planned surgery
 • Disabling stroke
 • Other comorbidity, such as CRF, liver disease, etc
STUDY PROCEDURES

• Sirolimus-eluting Cypher stent for all lesions
• Strong recommendation of IVUS-guidance
• Other adjunctive devices at the operator’s discretion
• Use of LIMA to LAD anastomosis
• Off- or on-pump surgery at the operator’s discretion
• Dual antiplatelet therapy at least for 6 months after
  PCI
• Standard medical treatment after PCI and CABG
FOLLOW-UP
• Clinical follow-up at 30 days and 6, 9, and 12 months
  via clinic visit or telephone interview.
• Routine angiographic follow-up at 8-10 months after
  PCI.
• Ischemia-guided angiographic follow-up after CABG.
• Retrospective SYNTAX score measurement in the
  Core Lab, CVRF, Seoul, Korea
PRIMARY END POINT
• A composite of major adverse cardiac or
 cerebrovascular events (MACCE) for the 12-month
 period after randomization including
  – Death from any cause
  – Myocardial infarction (MI)
  – Stroke
  – Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR)
POWER CALCULATION
• A non-inferiority margin : 7%
• A one-sided type I error rate : 0.05
• Power : 80%
• Assumption : a total of 572 patients (286 per group)
• A final sample size : 600 patients (300 per group)
  assuming 5% of loss
RESULTS
 The baseline clinical characteristics of the PCI and
  CABG groups were similar.
 Mean age of participants- 62 years
 76.5% were men.
 The baseline angiographic characteristics of the
two groups were also similar.
PROCEDURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY
    GROUPS
.
 Complete revascularization
         68.3% in the PCI group
         70.3% in the CABG group (P = 0.60).
 Duration of the hospital stay after the procedure
        8.4±14.5 days in the CABG group
        3.1±5.8 days in the PCI group (P<0.001).
 At the time of discharge, patients in the PCI group
  more consistently received medications.
 Follow-up angiography at 8 to 10 months
        performed more frequently in the PCI group
PROCEDURAL
CHARACTERISATION
PROCEDURAL CHARACTERISATION
TRIAL END POINT



 median follow-up period was 24.0 months in both the
  PCI and CABG groups.
 The primary end point of major adverse cardiac or
  cerebrovascular events at 12 months
       occurred in 26 patients assigned to PCI
       20 patients assigned to CABG
DEATH FROM ANY CAUSE
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
STROKE
TARGET VESSEL REVASCULARISATION
INFERENCE
 No significant between-group differences in the cumulative incidence rates of
  the individual components of the primary end point .

 2-year rate of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization was significantly
    lower in the CABG group than in the PCI group.

 There was no significant differences between the PCI and CABG groups in the
  registry cohort with respect to the rates of most of the major trial end points
  at 1 or 2 years.

 The exception was the end point of ischemia-driven target-vessel
  revascularization, which occurred significantly more frequently in
  PCI group.
DISCUSSION: COMPARISON WITH SYNTAX TRIAL

      PRECOMBAT                                 SYNTAX
 Lower CV or cerebrovascular        Higher event rate
    event rate.                      Event rate similar in
   Lower in stent thrombosis         PCI/CABG
   Pt. had less complex coronary    Mean SYNTAX score=30
    lesions & clinical settings.     Mean EUROSCORE=3.8
   Mean SYNTAX score=25             US & European population
   Mean EUROSCORE=2.7
   Better device & technique
   Asian population
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

 Underpowered study due to low event rate
 Wide inferiority margin of 7% point, so findings can
  not be considered clinically directive.
 Relatively high rate of cross over between PCI & CABG
  group.
 2 yr follow up period may not be enough for
  comparison.
 Restricted sample size. Difficult to extrapolate.
CONCLUSION

 At 1 yr, rate of CV or cerebrovascular events are similar
  in PCI & CABG groups .
 Meets the pre-specified criteria on non-inferiority of
  PCI to CABG.
 However due to low power and wide inferiority margin
  of trial, findings can not be considered as clinically
  directive.
Thanks

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Stroke & thrombectomy - Dr. Jo Caekebeke
Stroke & thrombectomy - Dr. Jo CaekebekeStroke & thrombectomy - Dr. Jo Caekebeke
Stroke & thrombectomy - Dr. Jo Caekebeke
Eric Tack
 
Tenecteplase X Alteplase no Acidente Vascular Cerebral - AVC
Tenecteplase  X Alteplase no Acidente Vascular Cerebral - AVCTenecteplase  X Alteplase no Acidente Vascular Cerebral - AVC
Tenecteplase X Alteplase no Acidente Vascular Cerebral - AVC
Jeferson Espindola
 

Tendances (20)

Appropriteness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization
Appropriteness Criteria for Coronary RevascularizationAppropriteness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization
Appropriteness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization
 
BEST OF ESC 2020
BEST OF ESC 2020BEST OF ESC 2020
BEST OF ESC 2020
 
PIONEER-HF Journal
PIONEER-HF JournalPIONEER-HF Journal
PIONEER-HF Journal
 
Ppt dawn trial
Ppt dawn trialPpt dawn trial
Ppt dawn trial
 
CONTROVERSIAS EN INTERVENCIONISMO SCACEST y enfermedad multivaso: Revasculari...
CONTROVERSIAS EN INTERVENCIONISMO SCACEST y enfermedad multivaso: Revasculari...CONTROVERSIAS EN INTERVENCIONISMO SCACEST y enfermedad multivaso: Revasculari...
CONTROVERSIAS EN INTERVENCIONISMO SCACEST y enfermedad multivaso: Revasculari...
 
Esc 2014 guidelines myocardial revascularization
Esc 2014 guidelines myocardial revascularizationEsc 2014 guidelines myocardial revascularization
Esc 2014 guidelines myocardial revascularization
 
Stich ii trial for supratentorial intra cerebral bleed
Stich ii trial for supratentorial intra cerebral bleedStich ii trial for supratentorial intra cerebral bleed
Stich ii trial for supratentorial intra cerebral bleed
 
ACT
ACTACT
ACT
 
Journal club 19 08-2015
Journal club 19 08-2015Journal club 19 08-2015
Journal club 19 08-2015
 
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for 12 or 30 months (DAPT Study)
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for 12 or 30 months (DAPT Study)Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for 12 or 30 months (DAPT Study)
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for 12 or 30 months (DAPT Study)
 
Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke 2014
Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke 2014Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke 2014
Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke 2014
 
What's Hot in EM April 2018
What's Hot in EM April 2018What's Hot in EM April 2018
What's Hot in EM April 2018
 
Stroke & thrombectomy - Dr. Jo Caekebeke
Stroke & thrombectomy - Dr. Jo CaekebekeStroke & thrombectomy - Dr. Jo Caekebeke
Stroke & thrombectomy - Dr. Jo Caekebeke
 
Alpheus trial ppt
Alpheus trial pptAlpheus trial ppt
Alpheus trial ppt
 
Tenecteplase X Alteplase no Acidente Vascular Cerebral - AVC
Tenecteplase  X Alteplase no Acidente Vascular Cerebral - AVCTenecteplase  X Alteplase no Acidente Vascular Cerebral - AVC
Tenecteplase X Alteplase no Acidente Vascular Cerebral - AVC
 
2017 dapt slide set2
2017 dapt slide set22017 dapt slide set2
2017 dapt slide set2
 
Dapt after pci how long SEPT 2016
Dapt after pci  how long SEPT 2016Dapt after pci  how long SEPT 2016
Dapt after pci how long SEPT 2016
 
Dapt duration
Dapt durationDapt duration
Dapt duration
 
ISAR REACT Study
ISAR REACT StudyISAR REACT Study
ISAR REACT Study
 
Journal club nortest trial
Journal club nortest trialJournal club nortest trial
Journal club nortest trial
 

Similaire à Precombat

Stroke update 2011
Stroke update 2011Stroke update 2011
Stroke update 2011
taem
 
Randomized trial of_stents_versus
Randomized trial of_stents_versusRandomized trial of_stents_versus
Randomized trial of_stents_versus
GOPAL GHOSH
 

Similaire à Precombat (20)

Important Trials of the Day & Basics of Biostatistics | IACTS SCORE 2020
Important Trials of the Day & Basics of Biostatistics | IACTS SCORE 2020Important Trials of the Day & Basics of Biostatistics | IACTS SCORE 2020
Important Trials of the Day & Basics of Biostatistics | IACTS SCORE 2020
 
Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction - REVIVED-BCIS2.pptx
Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction - REVIVED-BCIS2.pptxRevascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction - REVIVED-BCIS2.pptx
Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction - REVIVED-BCIS2.pptx
 
Lo mejor en insuficiencia cardiaca
Lo mejor en insuficiencia cardiacaLo mejor en insuficiencia cardiaca
Lo mejor en insuficiencia cardiaca
 
SYNTAX TRIAL.pptx
SYNTAX TRIAL.pptxSYNTAX TRIAL.pptx
SYNTAX TRIAL.pptx
 
Important Clinical Trials In Cardiology - An Overview 2016-17
Important Clinical Trials In Cardiology - An Overview 2016-17Important Clinical Trials In Cardiology - An Overview 2016-17
Important Clinical Trials In Cardiology - An Overview 2016-17
 
Биодеградирующие стенты расширение показаний, отдаленные результаты применен...
Биодеградирующие стенты расширение показаний, отдаленные результаты применен...Биодеградирующие стенты расширение показаний, отдаленные результаты применен...
Биодеградирующие стенты расширение показаний, отдаленные результаты применен...
 
Stich trial.pptx
Stich trial.pptxStich trial.pptx
Stich trial.pptx
 
Лечение пациентов с поражением ствола ЛКА, преимущества коронарной хирургии. ...
Лечение пациентов с поражением ствола ЛКА, преимущества коронарной хирургии. ...Лечение пациентов с поражением ствола ЛКА, преимущества коронарной хирургии. ...
Лечение пациентов с поражением ствола ЛКА, преимущества коронарной хирургии. ...
 
Journal Reading 2.pptx
Journal Reading 2.pptxJournal Reading 2.pptx
Journal Reading 2.pptx
 
Stich Qol Mark
Stich Qol MarkStich Qol Mark
Stich Qol Mark
 
Stroke update 2011
Stroke update 2011Stroke update 2011
Stroke update 2011
 
Left main disease pci vs cabg excel trial 2016
Left main disease   pci vs cabg excel trial 2016Left main disease   pci vs cabg excel trial 2016
Left main disease pci vs cabg excel trial 2016
 
Should we implant icd only in some patients with nicmp (cons)
Should we implant icd only in some patients with nicmp (cons)Should we implant icd only in some patients with nicmp (cons)
Should we implant icd only in some patients with nicmp (cons)
 
Cardiogenic shock
Cardiogenic shockCardiogenic shock
Cardiogenic shock
 
Highlights aha 2016
Highlights aha 2016Highlights aha 2016
Highlights aha 2016
 
Randomized trial of_stents_versus
Randomized trial of_stents_versusRandomized trial of_stents_versus
Randomized trial of_stents_versus
 
Journal
JournalJournal
Journal
 
Journal Article Analysis: Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in ACS (PLATO)
Journal Article Analysis: Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in ACS (PLATO)Journal Article Analysis: Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in ACS (PLATO)
Journal Article Analysis: Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in ACS (PLATO)
 
Trails on coronary revascularization
Trails on coronary revascularizationTrails on coronary revascularization
Trails on coronary revascularization
 
Journal club CTO.pptx
Journal club CTO.pptxJournal club CTO.pptx
Journal club CTO.pptx
 

Dernier

Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
WSO2
 
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businessWhy Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
panagenda
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 

Dernier (20)

Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
 
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 AmsterdamDEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
 
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businessWhy Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
 
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin WoodPolkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
 
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
 
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In PakistanCNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
 
WSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering Developers
WSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering DevelopersWSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering Developers
WSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering Developers
 
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfRising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
 
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
 
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherStrategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
 
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
 
ICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
ICT role in 21st century education and its challengesICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
ICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
 

Precombat

  • 2. INTRODUCTION • Recent registry and sub-study results have shown that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is safe and effective in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis. • However, due to the lack of randomized clinical trials, the comparability of PCI with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) remains uncertain.
  • 3. PRECOMBAT Trial Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease • DESIGN: a prospective, randomized clinical trial • OBJECTIVE: To compare PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents and CABG surgery for optimal revascularization of patients with ULMCA stenosis. • PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR  Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 4. PATIENT FLOW Enrolled Patients (N=1454) Randomized Cohort CABG registry N=335 N=600 PCI registry N=475 Medication registry N=44 Assigned CABG Assigned PCI N=300 N=300 1-year follow-up Treated CABG Treated CABG CABG registry N=310 N=248 N=24 PCI registry N=457 Treated PCI Treated PCI Medication registry N=41 N=51 N=276 Treated medical Treated medical N=1 N=0 2-year follow-up 1-year follow-up 1-year follow-up N=296 N=298 CABG registry N=259 PCI registry N=289 2-year follow-up 2-year F/U Medication registry N=39 N=266 N=270
  • 5. MAJOR INCLUSION CRITERIA • 18 years of age. • Significant de novo ULMCA stenosis (>50%) • Left main lesion and lesions outside ULMCA (if present) potentially comparably treatable with PCI and CABG. • Objective evidence of ischemia or ischemic symptom with angina or NSTEMI
  • 6. MAJOR EXCLUSION CRITERIA • Any contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy • Any previous PCI within 1 year • Previous CABG • Chronic total occlusion > 1 • AMI within 1 week • Shock or LV EF < 30% • Planned surgery • Disabling stroke • Other comorbidity, such as CRF, liver disease, etc
  • 7. STUDY PROCEDURES • Sirolimus-eluting Cypher stent for all lesions • Strong recommendation of IVUS-guidance • Other adjunctive devices at the operator’s discretion • Use of LIMA to LAD anastomosis • Off- or on-pump surgery at the operator’s discretion • Dual antiplatelet therapy at least for 6 months after PCI • Standard medical treatment after PCI and CABG
  • 8. FOLLOW-UP • Clinical follow-up at 30 days and 6, 9, and 12 months via clinic visit or telephone interview. • Routine angiographic follow-up at 8-10 months after PCI. • Ischemia-guided angiographic follow-up after CABG. • Retrospective SYNTAX score measurement in the Core Lab, CVRF, Seoul, Korea
  • 9. PRIMARY END POINT • A composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) for the 12-month period after randomization including – Death from any cause – Myocardial infarction (MI) – Stroke – Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR)
  • 10. POWER CALCULATION • A non-inferiority margin : 7% • A one-sided type I error rate : 0.05 • Power : 80% • Assumption : a total of 572 patients (286 per group) • A final sample size : 600 patients (300 per group) assuming 5% of loss
  • 12.  The baseline clinical characteristics of the PCI and CABG groups were similar.  Mean age of participants- 62 years  76.5% were men.  The baseline angiographic characteristics of the two groups were also similar.
  • 13. PROCEDURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY GROUPS .  Complete revascularization 68.3% in the PCI group 70.3% in the CABG group (P = 0.60).  Duration of the hospital stay after the procedure 8.4±14.5 days in the CABG group 3.1±5.8 days in the PCI group (P<0.001).  At the time of discharge, patients in the PCI group more consistently received medications.  Follow-up angiography at 8 to 10 months performed more frequently in the PCI group
  • 16. TRIAL END POINT  median follow-up period was 24.0 months in both the PCI and CABG groups.  The primary end point of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 12 months  occurred in 26 patients assigned to PCI  20 patients assigned to CABG
  • 17. DEATH FROM ANY CAUSE
  • 21. INFERENCE  No significant between-group differences in the cumulative incidence rates of the individual components of the primary end point .  2-year rate of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization was significantly lower in the CABG group than in the PCI group.  There was no significant differences between the PCI and CABG groups in the registry cohort with respect to the rates of most of the major trial end points at 1 or 2 years.  The exception was the end point of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization, which occurred significantly more frequently in PCI group.
  • 22. DISCUSSION: COMPARISON WITH SYNTAX TRIAL PRECOMBAT SYNTAX  Lower CV or cerebrovascular  Higher event rate event rate.  Event rate similar in  Lower in stent thrombosis PCI/CABG  Pt. had less complex coronary  Mean SYNTAX score=30 lesions & clinical settings.  Mean EUROSCORE=3.8  Mean SYNTAX score=25  US & European population  Mean EUROSCORE=2.7  Better device & technique  Asian population
  • 23. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY  Underpowered study due to low event rate  Wide inferiority margin of 7% point, so findings can not be considered clinically directive.  Relatively high rate of cross over between PCI & CABG group.  2 yr follow up period may not be enough for comparison.  Restricted sample size. Difficult to extrapolate.
  • 24. CONCLUSION  At 1 yr, rate of CV or cerebrovascular events are similar in PCI & CABG groups .  Meets the pre-specified criteria on non-inferiority of PCI to CABG.  However due to low power and wide inferiority margin of trial, findings can not be considered as clinically directive.