This document provides an agenda and overview for the 2014 SESAR SWIM Master Class event. It discusses the objectives of promoting SWIM (System Wide Information Management) standards and interoperability. The document outlines topics that will be covered at the event such as SWIM definitions, progress updates, outreach activities conducted since 2012. It describes the goals and expectations of the Master Class in engaging stakeholders and demonstrating the benefits of information sharing. Evaluation criteria are presented for the Master Class submissions focusing on technical and business contributions to ATM.

1. Wim Post / SESAR JOINT UNDERTAKING
Head of Programme Management
1
SESAR SWIM MASTER CLASS 2014 BEST-IN-CLASS EVENT

2. Agenda 11 December 2014 2

3. OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
SYSTEM PROTOTYPES
VALIDATION ACTIVITIES & RESULTS
PERFORMANCE VALIDATION TARGETS
CONCEPT & ARCHITECTURE
OPERATIONAL & TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS
CASES
STANDARDISATION & REGULATION PREP.
PERFORMANCE NEEDS
OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS & ENABLERS
HIGH LEVEL DEPLOYMENT & DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE
R&D PROJECTS
MASTER PLAN
PROGRAMME
SESAR DEVELOPMENT
4D TRAJECTORY
TRAFFIC SYNCHRONISATION
AIRPORT INTEGRATION
NETWORK MANAGEMENT
CONFLICT MGT. & AUTOMATION
SWIM

4. SWIM Definition 4
SWIM
standards
infrastructure
Governance
ATM Information
Qualified parties
Services
SESAR SWIM DEFINITION : Ref : SESAR SWIM CONOPS, adopted in ICAO SWIM Concept material

5. 0
2
4
6
8
10
SWIM
standards
infrastructure
Governance
ATM Information
Qualified parties
Services
SESAR SWIM Progress since 2012

6. 4
7
5
7
2
6
0
2
4
6
8
10
standards
infrastructure
Governance
ATM Information
Qualified parties
Services
SESAR SWIM Progress since 2012
2012
2013
2014

7. 4
7
5
7
2
6
0
2
4
6
8
10
standards
infrastructure
Governance
ATM Information
Qualified parties
Services
SESAR SWIM outreach
SESAR SWIM outreach
Communicating SWIM developments to
ATM stakeholders in- and outside the programme
2011 SWIM demonstration
2012 SESAR SWIM Master Class
2012 SWIM demonstration
2013 SWIM demonstration at WAC
2013 SESAR SWIM Master Class
2014 SWIM demonstration
2014 SESAR Master Class
2015 SESAR Master Class
2016 SWIM Global Demonstration

8. Master Class Objectives and Expectations 8
Engaging the state of the art competences; kick-starting the SWIM evolution.
Further developing and demonstrating the added value of state- of-the-art information technology for air traffic management.
Broadening the understanding of SWIM and the development of SWIM services and SWIM enabled ATM applications.
The creation of a SWIM Community of Interest (COI)
Facilitate first evaluation of SWIM compliance framework, governance and Registry.






9. SESAR SWIM OUTREACH WINS JANE’S ATC AWARD 9

10. Master Class 2014 : main milestones 10
Send back
signed
Agreements
Candidates
Submitted
material
31/10
Assessment
by Jury:
Shortlist
14/11
Best In Class
Event
11/12
Initiation
Day
24/06
Live
Demonstration
to Jury
20/11
81 General Agreements signed (last year 55)
39 proposals
12 Finalists
… Award Winners

11. Master Class Jury
•
SJU (Chairman): Wim Post
•
WP08: Peder Blomqvist
•
WP14: Xavier Jourdain
•
PB.04.03: Marc Brochard
•
AU: Urban Weisshaar
•
A6 (ANSPs): Tony Vaudrey
•
NM: Jean François Rousseaux
•
Declaration of confidentiality and conflict of interest
•
No proposals accepted from organisations they work for 11

12. TECHNOLOGY
SWIM design and technology contribution
Reusability
What is the degree of openness and reusability of the proposed solution? Is the solution really open or linked to non-cots techno?
Interoperability
What is the degree to which the proposed solution can exchange information and use information that has been exchanged? Interoperability at # levels : 1.semantic level (e.g. ISRM / AIRM ) 2.syntactical level ( AIXM / FIXM / WXXM ) 3.technical level ( SWIM TI )
Technology maturity
What is the technology readiness? Is that mainstream IT Techno (massive or niche deployment)?
Master Class Assessment Framework 12
BUSINESS
ATM Business contribution
Relevance
Is there a good motivation for making this development ? Does the problem identified correspond to a real and pregnant ATM problem? Or is it more a business opportunity?
Adequacy
Does the solution achieve the goal as defined by the motivation? How does the solution proposed respond to the identified ATM problem? Does the proposed solution bring real benefits to the ATM?
Time to market
How quick the proposed solution can be implemented and deployed in ATM?

13. Presented by Marc Brochard
NEXT: OVERVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS 13