11. (11)
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chs_medien/5381379976/
Remembering the
scenario of the online
students by Oblinger and
Oblinger (2005, p. 2.1)
Thinking of the
possession of hardware
and the daily
consumption of media.
Resuming the functions
media have for teaching
and learning and in
everyday life.
(11)
15. (15)
Source:
h6p://i-‐literacy.e-‐learning.imb-‐uni-‐augsburg.de/node/588
Information
Source:
h6p://medienzoo.wikispaces.com/Twi6er+-‐+Wissensmanagement+in
+140+Zeichen
Collaboration
Source:
h6p://websquare.imb-‐uni-‐augsburg.de/weblog/2011-‐02-‐06/4456
Reflection
Source:
h6p://begleitstudium.imb-‐uni-‐augsburg.de/start
Communication
16. (16)
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chs_medien/5381379976/
But
while these students are often
described in catchy terms, first and
foremost consideration should be
given to the notion, that it does not
seem to be fair to form a prejudice
against a new generation as a whole.
(Schulmeister, 2010; Schulmeister, 2012, p. 37)
(16)
17. (17)
Source:
h6p://i-‐literacy.e-‐learning.imb-‐uni-‐augsburg.de/node/588
Information
Source:
h6p://medienzoo.wikispaces.com/Twi6er+-‐+Wissensmanagement+in
+140+Zeichen
Collaboration
Source:
h6p://websquare.imb-‐uni-‐augsburg.de/weblog/2011-‐02-‐06/4456
Reflection
Source:
h6p://begleitstudium.imb-‐uni-‐augsburg.de/start
Communication
19. (19)
How are Media Used?
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mkhmarketing/8539048913
20. (20)
(Kleimann et al., 2008, p. 6; figures in %)
Wikipedia
Social
Communities
Chat/IM
Youtube
Other Wikis
Weblogs
Online
Games
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mkhmarketing/8539048913
How often Do You Use ...
21. (21)
... Social Communities for
the Following ...
to communicate
with friends
to find old friends
to get remembered
to birthday
to share students‘
information
to get new
friends
to see other community
members acting
(Kleimann et al., 2008, p. 7; figures in %)
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mkhmarketing/8539048913
26. (26)
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/augschburger/4738436760/
“As such most of the learning that
takes place on Facebook is the
learning that would have taken place
previously in the corridors, back of
classrooms, cafeterias and after-
school telephones conversations.”
(Selwyn, 2008, pp. 4-5).
(26)
27. (27)
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mkhmarketing/8539048913
The broader appreciation
of media in educational
settings is challenging
for all subjects involved.
The use of Facebook is
characterized neither by
non-formal or informal
communication.
Media are often not part of
the instructional design,
and often begin with an
initiative by the students.
28. (28)
What We Need to Know
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mkhmarketing/8539048913
31. (31)
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/89139705@N00/409318255/
Media Literacies
Include information and media literacies
(e.g. Schiefner-Rohs, 2012)
Media literacy can be defined as ”the ability to access,
understand and create communications in a variety of
contexts“ (Buckingham, 2005, p. 3).
34. (34)
Change that affects
individual and institutional
habits.
Source http://www.flickr.com/photos/andreaaa68/7992414737/
(34)
35. (35)
Change that affects
individual and institutional
habits.
(Social) Media as
relevant content,
practices, and issue.
Source http://www.flickr.com/photos/andreaaa68/7992414737/
(35)
36. (36)
Change that affects
individual and institutional
habits.
(Social) Media as
relevant content,
practices, and issue.
Source http://www.flickr.com/photos/andreaaa68/7992414737/
Vagueness in dealing
with media corresponds
with challenges for Higher
Education.
(36)
37. (37)
Change that affects
individual and institutional
habits.
(Social) Media as
relevant content,
practices, and issue.
Source http://www.flickr.com/photos/andreaaa68/7992414737/
Vagueness in dealing
with media corresponds
with challenges for Higher
Education.
Designing educational
ambients (teacher- and
student-driven)
(37)
38. (38)
Change that affects
individual and institutional
habits.
(Social) Media as
relevant content,
practices, and issue.
Source http://www.flickr.com/photos/andreaaa68/7992414737/
Vagueness in dealing
with media corresponds
with challenges for Higher
Education.
Closer look at the relation
between the individual,
university and society
Designing educational
ambients (teacher- and
student-driven)
(38)
40. (40)
Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mkhmarketing/8527527570
Deputy Prof. Dr. Sandra Hofhues
Heidelberg School of Education
Professorship of New Media Didactics
Im Neuenheimer Feld 561
D-69120 Heidelberg
hofhues@ph-heidelberg.de
http://www.sandrahofhues.de
(40)
Ass. Prof. Dr. Mandy Schiefner-Rohs
University of Kaiserslautern
Department of Pedagogy
Erwin-Schrödinger-Strasse
D 67663 Kaiserslautern
mandy.rohs@sowi.uni-kl.de
http://www.2headz.ch/blog/
41. (41)
Baacke, D. (1996). Medienkompetenz - Begrifflichkeit und sozialer Wandel [Media Literacy - Terminology and Social Change]. In A. von Rein (ed.),
Medienkompetenz als Schlüsselbegriff [Media Literacy as Key Term] (pp. 112–124). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
Ball, R. (2007). Wissenschaftskommunikation der Zukunft [Science Communication in Future.]. Jülich: Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich.
Buckingham, D. (2005). The Media Literacy of Children and Young People. A review of the research literature on behalf of Ofcom. http://
eprints.ioe.ac.uk/145/1/Buckinghammedialiteracy.pdf (2013-05-31)
Buckingham, D. (2010). Defining Digital Literacy. In B. Bachmair (ed.), Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen. [Media Education in New Cultural
Spaces] (pp. 59-71). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Ebner, M., Schiefner, M. & Nagler, W. (2008). Has the Net Generation Arrived at the University? – oder Studierende von Heute, Digital Natives?
[Has the Net Generation Arrived at the University?– Or Today’s Students, Digital Natives?.] In S. Zauchner, P. Baumgartner, E. Blaschitz & A.
Weissenbäck (eds.), Offener Bildungsraum Hochschule – Freiheiten und Notwendigkeiten (pp. 113–123). Münster: Waxmann.
Flechsig, K.-H. (1975). Handlungsebenen der Hochschuldidaktik. [Dimensions of Higher Education.] ZIFF-Papiere Fernuniversität 3. [ZIPF Papers
Distance Education 3.] http://deposit.fernuni-hagen.de/1703/1/ZP_003.pdf (2013-05-31)
Grosch, M. & Gideon, G. (2011). Mediennutzungsgewohnheiten im Wandel. Ergebnisse einer Befragung zur studiumsbezogenen Mediennutzung.
[Changing Habits in Media Use. Findings of a Survey of the Use of Media in Studying.] Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.
Hofhues, S., Geier, C. & Grießhammer, L. (2012). Fostering Crossmedia Literacy in Formal Educational Contexts: Conceptual Considerations and
Case-Specific Results. In A. Tokar, M. Beurskens, S. Keuneke, M. Mahrt, I. Peters, C. Puschmann, T. van Treeck & K. Weller (eds.), Science
and the Internet (pp. 87–98). Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.
Hofhues, S. & Schiefner-Rohs, M. (2012). Doktorandenausbildung zwischen Selbstorganisation und Vernetzung: zur Bedeutung digitaler sozialer
Medien. [Doctoral Education between Self-Organisation and Connection: the Relevance of Digital Social Media.] In G. Csanyi, F. Reichl, A.
Steiner (eds.), Digitale Medien – Werkzeuge für exzellente Forschung und Lehre [Digital Media – Tools for Excellent Research and Teaching.]
(pp. 313–323). Münster: Waxmann.
Junco, R. (2011). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computer &
Education, 58(1), 162–171. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004 (2013-05-31).
Kleimann, B., Özkilik, M., & Göcks, M. (2008). Studieren im Web 2.0. [Studying in Web 2.0.] HISBUS‐Kurzinformation Nr. 21 (Vol. 21).
Mavasheva, O. (2012). Das Social Web als Bildungsraum. Wie organisieren sich Studenten in dem sozialen Netzwerk Facebook? [The Social Web
as Educational Space. How do Students Organize Each Other in the Social Network Facebook?] Unpublished Bachelor-Thesis, University of
Duisburg-Essen.
Meyer, T., Mayrberger, K., Münte-Goussar, S. & Schwalbe, C. (eds.) (2011), Kontrolle und Selbstkontrolle. Zur Ambivalenz von E-Portfolios in
Bildungsprozessen. [Control and Self-Control. To the Ambivalence of E-Portfolios in Educational Processes.] Wiesbaden: VS.
References
42. (42)
Münker, S. (2009). Emergenz digitaler Öffentlichkeiten. Die Sozialen Medien im Web 2.0. [Emergence of Digital Publics. The Social Media and
Web 2.0.], Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Oblinger, D. & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Is It Age or IT: First Steps Toward Understanding the Net Generation (Chapter 2). In D. Oblinger & J. L.
Oblinger (eds.), Educating the Net Generation. Washington: Educause. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf (2013-05-31).
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon. 9/5. http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital
%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf (2013-05-31).
Reinmann, G. (2009). Selbstorganisation auf dem Prüfstand: Das Web 2.0 und seine Grenzen(losigkeit) [Self-Organization on Test Bench: The
Web 2.0 and its Boundlessness]. In B. Bachmair (Hrsg.), Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen. [Media Education in New Cultural Spaces.]
Wiesbaden: VS.
Schenk, M., Taddicken, M., & Welker, M. (2008). Web 2.0 als Chance für die Markt- und Sozialforschung? [Web 2.0 as Chance for Market and
Social Research.] In A. Zerfaß, M. Welker, & J. Schmidt (eds.), Kommunikation, Partizipation und Wirkungen im Social Web [Communication,
Participation and Effects at the Social Web.] (pp. 243–266). Köln: Halem.
Schiefner-Rohs, M. (2012). Kritische Informations- und Medienkompetenz im Spannungsfeld zwischen Hochschul- und Disziplinenkultur. [Critical
Information and Media Literacies between University and Disciplinary Culture.] Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung [Journal of Higher
Education.], 7(3), 16-27.
Schiefner-Rohs, M. & Hofhues, S. (submitted). Education beyond Facebook. Pleading for an Appropriate Media Use in Higher Education. Digital
Culture and Education (further data not yet known).
Schmidt, J.-H., Paus-Hasebrink, I., Hasebrink, U. & Lampert, C. (2009). Heranwachsen mit dem Social Web: Zur Rolle von Web 2.0-Angeboten im
Alltag von Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen. [Growing Up with the Social Web: The Role of Web 2.0 Options in the Everyday Life of the
Youth and Younger Adults.] http://www.hans-bredow-institut.de/webfm_send/367 (2013-05-31).
Scholz, J. (2008). Forschen mit dem Web 2.0 – eher Pflicht als Kür [Research with the Social Web – More Compulsory than Optional.]. In A.
Zerfaß, M. Welker, & J. Schmidt (Eds.), Kommunikation, Partizipation und Wirkungen im Social Web [Communication, Participation and Effects
at the Social Web.] (pp. 229–242). Köln: Halem.
Schulmeister, R. (2010). Deconstructing the Media Use of the Net Generation. Qwerty Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and
Education. Vol 5, No 2, 26-60.
Schulmeister, R. (2012). Der Schlüssel zur Medienkompetenz liegt im Begriff der Kontrolle. [The Key to Media Literacy is the Term Control.]
Zeitschrift für E-Learning. [Journal of E-Learning.] 4, 35-45.
Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 2, 157–174.
Van Eimeren, B. & Frees, B. (2012). 76 % der Deutschen online – neue Nutzungssituationen durch mobile Endgeräte. Ergebnisse der ARD-/ZDF-
Onlinestudie. [76 % of the Germans Online – new Use Cases with Mobile Media. Findings from the ARD-/ZDF-Online Study.] Media
Perspektiven. [Media Perspectives.] 7–8, 362–379.
References | Part 2
