SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  1
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Compliance
Increased
processingspeed
Customer
Satisfaction
QuickResults
Easytoimplement
Decreasederrors
Potential$Saving
Lowcost
Useoftechnology
a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i.
a. Compliance N/A 1 5 5 10 1 5 0.2 1 28.2 15%
b. Increased processing speed 1 N/A 1 1 1 1 0.2 1 1 7.2 4%
c. Customer Satisfaction 0.2 1 N/A 10 1 5 10 0.2 0.2 27.6 15%
d. Quick Results 0.2 1 0.1 N/A 10 5 1 5 5 27.3 14% to help determine the most important ones**
e. Easy to implement 0.1 1 1 0.1 N/A 0.1 5 1 0.2 8.5 4%
f. Decreased errors 1 1 0.2 0.2 10 N/A 0.1 10 0.1 22.6 12%
g. Potential $ Saving 0.2 5 0.1 1 0.2 10 N/A 0.2 1 17.7 9%
h. Low cost 5 1 5 0.2 1 0.1 5 N/A 10 27.3 14%
i. Use of technology 1 1 5 0.2 5 10 1 0.1 N/A 23.3 12%
Column Total 8.7 12 17.4 17.7 38.2 32.2 27.3 17.7 18.5 189.7 100%
EXAMPLE: Compliance, (block C6) is more important, equally important, or less important than increased processing speed (block E4).
Indicate your response in the (E6) block. Do this for all blocks with drop down menus.
10 This criteria is considered to be extremely more important or more preferred.
5 This criteria is considered to be significantly more important or more preferred.
1 This criteria is considered to be equally preferred
0.2 This criteria is significantly less important/preferred.
0.1 This criteria is of negliable importance or preference.
**This criteria prioritization table is intended to establish a "weight" for each criteria
Vision Mission and Values Criteria
%
Total
Compared against the other criteria Row

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Strategic prioritization matrix

Pt hpm half yearly presentation on may
Pt hpm half yearly presentation on mayPt hpm half yearly presentation on may
Pt hpm half yearly presentation on mayaristomy
 
STRATEGICALLY CHANGING TO SUPPORT-Team Version 11-2013
STRATEGICALLY CHANGING TO SUPPORT-Team Version 11-2013STRATEGICALLY CHANGING TO SUPPORT-Team Version 11-2013
STRATEGICALLY CHANGING TO SUPPORT-Team Version 11-2013John Barney
 
IE431 Final Presentation
IE431 Final PresentationIE431 Final Presentation
IE431 Final PresentationArnaud Marquet
 
Yearly Achivement 2017
Yearly Achivement 2017Yearly Achivement 2017
Yearly Achivement 2017SuhariEte2
 
Improve the User Experience in the Engineering Change Process
Improve the User Experience in the Engineering Change ProcessImprove the User Experience in the Engineering Change Process
Improve the User Experience in the Engineering Change ProcessDeeDee Kato
 
Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013
Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013
Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013Pedram Danesh-Mand
 
Agile4 com method-uk_v3.675
Agile4 com method-uk_v3.675Agile4 com method-uk_v3.675
Agile4 com method-uk_v3.675all2com
 
Webinar lean in maintenance 1 juli 2020
Webinar   lean in maintenance 1 juli 2020Webinar   lean in maintenance 1 juli 2020
Webinar lean in maintenance 1 juli 2020Stork
 
OneFormRedesignImpactProcessingCost_TaraEvans_BFMA2014
OneFormRedesignImpactProcessingCost_TaraEvans_BFMA2014OneFormRedesignImpactProcessingCost_TaraEvans_BFMA2014
OneFormRedesignImpactProcessingCost_TaraEvans_BFMA2014Tara Evans, PMP
 
Response Surface Regression
Response Surface RegressionResponse Surface Regression
Response Surface RegressionRonald Shewchuk
 
Test Metrics
Test MetricsTest Metrics
Test MetricsDevukjs
 
iCare Sales Presentation (PowerPoint - view notes page for notes) 11-11
iCare Sales Presentation (PowerPoint - view notes page for notes) 11-11iCare Sales Presentation (PowerPoint - view notes page for notes) 11-11
iCare Sales Presentation (PowerPoint - view notes page for notes) 11-11Daniel Kelly, PSP
 
Continuous Delivery and Automated Operations on k8s with keptn
Continuous Delivery and Automated Operations on k8s with keptnContinuous Delivery and Automated Operations on k8s with keptn
Continuous Delivery and Automated Operations on k8s with keptnAndreas Grabner
 

Similaire à Strategic prioritization matrix (20)

Pt hpm half yearly presentation on may
Pt hpm half yearly presentation on mayPt hpm half yearly presentation on may
Pt hpm half yearly presentation on may
 
STRATEGICALLY CHANGING TO SUPPORT-Team Version 11-2013
STRATEGICALLY CHANGING TO SUPPORT-Team Version 11-2013STRATEGICALLY CHANGING TO SUPPORT-Team Version 11-2013
STRATEGICALLY CHANGING TO SUPPORT-Team Version 11-2013
 
IE431 Final Presentation
IE431 Final PresentationIE431 Final Presentation
IE431 Final Presentation
 
Yearly Achivement 2017
Yearly Achivement 2017Yearly Achivement 2017
Yearly Achivement 2017
 
Cost Reduction.pdf
Cost Reduction.pdfCost Reduction.pdf
Cost Reduction.pdf
 
Mistake proofing smpl_1
Mistake proofing smpl_1Mistake proofing smpl_1
Mistake proofing smpl_1
 
Spi Cost Roi
Spi Cost RoiSpi Cost Roi
Spi Cost Roi
 
Improve the User Experience in the Engineering Change Process
Improve the User Experience in the Engineering Change ProcessImprove the User Experience in the Engineering Change Process
Improve the User Experience in the Engineering Change Process
 
Dell computers (a)
Dell computers (a)Dell computers (a)
Dell computers (a)
 
Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013
Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013
Effective Contingency Management - Contractor Management Forum - PD July 2013
 
Agile4 com method-uk_v3.675
Agile4 com method-uk_v3.675Agile4 com method-uk_v3.675
Agile4 com method-uk_v3.675
 
Webinar lean in maintenance 1 juli 2020
Webinar   lean in maintenance 1 juli 2020Webinar   lean in maintenance 1 juli 2020
Webinar lean in maintenance 1 juli 2020
 
OneFormRedesignImpactProcessingCost_TaraEvans_BFMA2014
OneFormRedesignImpactProcessingCost_TaraEvans_BFMA2014OneFormRedesignImpactProcessingCost_TaraEvans_BFMA2014
OneFormRedesignImpactProcessingCost_TaraEvans_BFMA2014
 
Q1 2009 Earning Report of Standard Register Co.
Q1 2009 Earning Report of Standard Register Co.Q1 2009 Earning Report of Standard Register Co.
Q1 2009 Earning Report of Standard Register Co.
 
Response Surface Regression
Response Surface RegressionResponse Surface Regression
Response Surface Regression
 
Test Metrics
Test MetricsTest Metrics
Test Metrics
 
Tqm presentation
Tqm presentationTqm presentation
Tqm presentation
 
Square Pitch Deck
Square Pitch DeckSquare Pitch Deck
Square Pitch Deck
 
iCare Sales Presentation (PowerPoint - view notes page for notes) 11-11
iCare Sales Presentation (PowerPoint - view notes page for notes) 11-11iCare Sales Presentation (PowerPoint - view notes page for notes) 11-11
iCare Sales Presentation (PowerPoint - view notes page for notes) 11-11
 
Continuous Delivery and Automated Operations on k8s with keptn
Continuous Delivery and Automated Operations on k8s with keptnContinuous Delivery and Automated Operations on k8s with keptn
Continuous Delivery and Automated Operations on k8s with keptn
 

Strategic prioritization matrix

  • 1. Compliance Increased processingspeed Customer Satisfaction QuickResults Easytoimplement Decreasederrors Potential$Saving Lowcost Useoftechnology a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. a. Compliance N/A 1 5 5 10 1 5 0.2 1 28.2 15% b. Increased processing speed 1 N/A 1 1 1 1 0.2 1 1 7.2 4% c. Customer Satisfaction 0.2 1 N/A 10 1 5 10 0.2 0.2 27.6 15% d. Quick Results 0.2 1 0.1 N/A 10 5 1 5 5 27.3 14% to help determine the most important ones** e. Easy to implement 0.1 1 1 0.1 N/A 0.1 5 1 0.2 8.5 4% f. Decreased errors 1 1 0.2 0.2 10 N/A 0.1 10 0.1 22.6 12% g. Potential $ Saving 0.2 5 0.1 1 0.2 10 N/A 0.2 1 17.7 9% h. Low cost 5 1 5 0.2 1 0.1 5 N/A 10 27.3 14% i. Use of technology 1 1 5 0.2 5 10 1 0.1 N/A 23.3 12% Column Total 8.7 12 17.4 17.7 38.2 32.2 27.3 17.7 18.5 189.7 100% EXAMPLE: Compliance, (block C6) is more important, equally important, or less important than increased processing speed (block E4). Indicate your response in the (E6) block. Do this for all blocks with drop down menus. 10 This criteria is considered to be extremely more important or more preferred. 5 This criteria is considered to be significantly more important or more preferred. 1 This criteria is considered to be equally preferred 0.2 This criteria is significantly less important/preferred. 0.1 This criteria is of negliable importance or preference. **This criteria prioritization table is intended to establish a "weight" for each criteria Vision Mission and Values Criteria % Total Compared against the other criteria Row