4. No, I've never
noticed, 16%
Yes, there are, but
they NEVER pose
challenges, 12%
Yes, they
SOMETIME
S/OFTEN
pose
challenges,
72%
Neil Howe & Reena Nadler, WHY GENERATIONS MATTER: Ten Findings from LifeCourse
Research on the Workforce, Feb 28, 2012
5. "I see no hope for the future of
our people if they are dependent
on the frivolous youth of
today, for they are reckless
beyond words. When I was
young, we were taught to be
discreet, respectful of elders, but
the
present
youth
are
exceedingly disrespectful and
impatient.“
– Socrates, c. 400 BC
Image credit: marzolino / 123RF Stock Photo
6. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Pragmatic
Cynical
Value liberty, survival
Children of Artist
Children in Awakening
Nomad
•
•
•
•
•
Principled, creative
Ruthless, narcissistic
Value vision, values
Children of Hero
Children in High
•
•
•
•
•
Open-minded, expert
Sentimental
Value due process
Children of Nomad
Children in Crisis
Hero
Prophet
Rational, Competent
Unreflective, bold
Value community
Children of Prophet
Elder in Awakening
Artist
7. • Gen X
• GI
• Millennials
Nomad
Prophet
• Boomers
Hero
Artist
• Silent
• Homeland
9. Hero: GI (1901-1924), Millennial
(1981-2004)
Artist: Silent (1925-1942), Homeland
(2005-Present)
Prophet: Baby Boom (1943-1960)
Nomad: Generation X (1961-1980)
10. 24,000
23,000
22,000
21,000
20,000
19,000
18,000
17,000
Homeland
41 million
16,000
Under 5 to 9
5 years years
Generation X
61 million
Millennials
85 million
10 to
14
years
15 to
19
years
20 to
24
years
25 to
29
years
30 to
34
years
35 to
39
years
40 to
44
years
Series 1
Baby Boomers
81 million
45 to
49
years
50 to
54
years
55 to
59
years
60 to
64
years
Silent & GI
58 million
65 to
74
years
75 to
84
years
85
years
and
over
12. 4.5 M Millennials/year
enter economy w/ 130M jobs
160,000
120,000
4.5 M Boomers/year
enter economy w/ 50M jobs
80,000
40,000
0
F-48
F-52
F-56
F-60
F-64
F-68
F-72
F-76
F-80
F-84
F-88
Total Non-Farm Payroll, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2013
F-92
F-96
F-00
F-04
F-08
F-12
17. Selfless, rational, competent
Unreflective, mechanistic, overbold
Community, affluence, technology
Children of Prophet Generation
Young adult in Crisis, Elders in Awakening
Thomas Jefferson, John Kennedy, Walt Disney, Ronald
Reagan, Mark Zuckerburg
Millennial (1982-2004), GI (1901-1924)
18. Hero Generation
Born 1983 – 2004
Politics: Clinton-Lewinsky, No Child Left
Behind, relatively stable political
culture, 9/11, War on Terror
Society: helicopter parents, every body gets
a ribbon, zero tolerance, social
media, diversity, self-esteem
Business: Technology bubble, startups, Facebook, Google, Apple, Netflix
Culture: focused on technology, celebrity
sex tapes, “famous for being
famous”, sharing
19.
20.
21.
22.
23. Be brutally honest in the interview
Don’t hire them if you sense a whiff of entitlement
Do a hunger check
Everyone announces themselves in the interview
Shake them up a little
When you find the good ones, help them move up – even if that means losing them
Lesley Jane Seymour, How I Hire: 6 Ways I Find and Hire Hardworking Millennials, Sept 24, 2103
24.
25. Principled, resolute, creative
Narcissistic, presumptious, ruthless
Vision, Values, Religion
Children of Hero Generation
Children in post-crisis, young adult in Awakening
Ben Franklin, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin
Roosevelt, Steve Jobs, Bill Clinton
Baby Boom (1943-1960)
26. Prophet Generation
Born 1943 – 1960
Politics: Eisenhower, JFK/LBJ – Great
Society, Moon Landing, Civil
Rights, Vietnam, Riots
Society: mass movement to
suburbs, consumer culture, child-focused
because of boom
Business: “Business of America is
Business”, creation of large national
corporations, challenge to be noticed at
work
Culture: focused on
values, family, “truth, justice and the
American way”
27.
28. 4.5 M Millennials/year
enter economy w/ 130M jobs
160,000
120,000
4.5 M Boomers/year
enter economy w/ 50M jobs
80,000
40,000
0
F-48
F-52
F-56
F-60
F-64
F-68
F-72
F-76
F-80
F-84
F-88
Total Non-Farm Payroll, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2013
F-92
F-96
F-00
F-04
F-08
F-12
29.
30. Protecting through involvement
What’s best for the GROUP of children
Giving children what they need to be
successful
Aspirational – you can do anything!
Everybody wins
Adapted from Frank N. Magid Associates, The Pluralist Generation, 2012
31. 50%
Percentage who DISAGREE: "I believe in
working only so long as it adds value for the
client or customer. Working harder or longer is
pointless."
46%
40%
36%
32%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Boomer
Gen X
Millennial
Neil Howe & Reena Nadler, WHY GENERATIONS MATTER: Ten Findings from LifeCourse
Research on the Workforce, Feb 28, 2012
32. Alan Framm, One In Four Working Baby Boomers Say They'll Never Retire, Survey
Finds, Huffington Post: Retirement, 4/5/11, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/05/babyboomers-retirement-fears_n_844957.html
33. Emphasize how the company mission affects the customer or
the greater society at large
Involve them in decision making processes
Lead and establish authority by example
Encourage them to forge social connections in the workplace
Understand they may want to communicate differently:
memos/phone calls vs. email/texts
Try to limit “office politics” in work assignments and evaluations
Provide continual training and assistance with technology
34.
35. Savvy, practical, perceptive
Unfeeling, uncultured, amoral
Liberty, survival, honor
Children of Artist Generation
Children in Awakening, midlife in Crisis
Queen Elizabeth I, George Washington, Ulysses
Grant, George Patton, Harry Truman
Generation X (1961-1981)
36. Nomad Generation
Born 1961 – 1982
Politics: Nixon resignation, Energy
crisis, Iranian hostage crisis, IranContra, Challenger, Gulf War
Society: end of 1960s, “Me” decade, divorce
revolution, working Moms, “quality
time”, latchkey kids, Catholic church/Boy
Scouts abuse
Business: downsizing, multinational
corporations
Culture: focused on technology, nontraditional families, independent
youth, alienation
40. Sylvia Ann Hewlett and Lauren Leader-Chivée, The X Factor: Tapping into the Strengths of the
33- to 46-Year-old Generation, Center for Work Life Policy, 2011
41. Try to find opportunities for advancement
Xers are caught between Boomers who
expect face time and Millennials who expect
work life balance
Measure performance by
accomplishment/achievement
Allow them to work independently or look for
“entrepreneurship” opportunities
Eliminate red-tape and bureaucracy
Provide continual training and assistance
with technology
43. Authority – How to be an authority to older customers
Communications competence – talk on the phone
Endurance – stick with the program long enough to
be successful
Social Networking – how to leverage your social
network for business, and how to do old-school in
person networking
44. Help the client identify explicit need
Let the client know you understand the need
Bring focus on how your solution (you) solves
the need
ASK FOR THE BUSINESS
51. Introduce two other connectors
Introduce two people with an idea in mind
Have a dinner of interesting people
Follow up
Re-establish contact
Show up
Interview people
Produce something of value
Time
James Altrucher, Become a SuperConnector, October 2011
Image credit: Ratchanida Thippayos / 123RF Stock
Photo
52. You should feel the
greatest satisfaction if one
day your subordinate can
do your job better than
you ever did, not
disparaging. For this is
the ultimate in
achievement …. The next
generation must be more
than ready to fill our
shoes; they must be
ready to run faster in
them.
-Lieutenant Col. Om Prakash, 87th Flying
Training Squadron commander
Notes de l'éditeur
Why can’t we all just get along?
I see no hope for the future of our people if they are dependent on the frivolous youth of today, for they are reckless beyond words. When I was young, we were taught to be discreet, respectful of elders, but the present youth are exceedingly disrespectful and impatient.“ – Socrates, 400 BC
Why are we even talking about this? – because there are not enough 35-45 year olds to replace your currently retiring employees and leaders.
It’s not just a problem in the US – it’s a problem across most of the developed world. All of the countries in red show a skills gap by 2020. The gaps reflected in this chart are based solely on numbers – the gaps widen when you consider qualitative issues like job mismatch and employability.If that’s not enough to scare you, there are a couple of other statistics that should. In 2011, a study by the Manpower Group showed that 52% of employers had difficulty filling positions because of talent shortages. That’s partly because of the last graph. Drilling down the problem is as much inflexibility as anything else; Peter Cappelli of the Wall Street Journal says “With an abundance of workers to choose from, employers are demanding more of job candidates than ever before. They want prospective workers to be able to fill a role right away, without any training or ramp-up time.” So the qualified workers you want are not there in the labor force. And right now companies are concluding, in the words of Robert Goldfarb of the New York Times: “Let them grow up on someone else’s payroll.” That strategy can work, but the economy is shifting, even if it’s imperceptively slow. CareerBuilder surveys they showed that last year 54% of companies reported they were hiring recent college grads, up from just 43% in 2009. Of companies hiring, 29% said they were paying more than the year before. So you’re going to have more competition to get the best grads. The other shift that’s going to limit your strategy is that people are quitting jobs again. The BLS prepares a report called the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey – and the April report showed that more people are now changing jobs than at any time since 2008, and that the numbers have jumped dramatically over the last few months. To recap – the replacement employees you need aren’t in the workforce, you’ve got increased competition for the very best of unskilled recent college graduates, and the economy has sufficiently improved to allow your best existing workers to quit and take a new job. So what do you do?
I think there are three key reasons why the Millennials think so differently from you Both the Boomers and the Millennials average about 4.5 million people per year. So in 1965, the Boomers were competing with 4.5 million potential workers in an economy of 71 million jobs, while the same number of Millennials are today competing in an economy twice that size. So the boomers had to stay late, had to show up on Saturday, had to have "face time" with the boss so that you would get noticed; there were four or five other people that could or would take that job if you didn't keep it. Today's 25 year old millienial simply does not face that same type of challenge. On top of that, for the first time in history, the youngest generation in the workforce possesses technological skill dominance over the older, supervising generations. So, not only is the competition much less to get a job for these workers, they may often have better skills than the people who have just hired and are supervising them.
Percentage of Millennials Planning to Change Jobs When Economy Improves: 70% UNC Kenan-Flagler Business School, The Force of Gen Y, June 28, 2012, http://under30ceo.com/infographic-the-who-how-and-why-of-leading-gen-y/Employee engagement is the extent to which employees are motivated to contribute to organizational success and are willing to apply discretionary effort to accomplishing tasks important to the achievement of organizational goals.Rudy Karsan and Kevin Kruse, WE: How to Increase Performance and Profits Through Full Engagement, 2011John Fleming and Jim Asplund, Human Sigma, 2007Hay Group, “Engage Employees and Boost Performance,” Working Paper, 2001. http://web.archive.org/web/20061123123100/http://haygroup.ca/pdf/knowledge_engaged_performance_working_paper.pdfEngaged workers are 18% more productive, 12% more profitable, and 27% less prone to absenteeism. High-engagement companies had an EPS 18% higher than competitors and had growth rates 2.6 times of low-engagement competitors. High-engagement employees can outperform low-engagement employees in highly technical and sales positions by as much as 120%.Researchers from UC Berkeley studied married police officers in the 1990s and found that job stress spilled over into their marriages. Mental job stress led to more marital conflict than physical exhaustion. High mental stress lead to increased cardiovascular activity with lower bodily activity. Couples were “amped up” on the inside but passive on the outside. A 1985 study by NYU showed the opposite – an enriching job led to better marriages while a challenging work environment made both partners more argumentative.Studies at Queen’s University show a similar impact on how a mother’s job stress effects her children, and research has shown that fathers who report low job satisfaction have children who misbehave more frequently at school.Researchers in Finland studied the health impacts of job satisfaction and published their results in the British Medical Journal. They studied workers from 1973 through 2001 and found that workers who were dissatisfied with their jobs and compensation/reward opportunities had a BMI 0.6 higher than satisfied employees – about 5 additional pounds. They also found that workers who rated their managers as effective were 1/3 to ½ less likely to have a heart attack – in other words, having a good boss made employees as much as 50% less likely to have a heart attack.But most shocking was their finding that dissatisfied workers were 2.4 times more likely to die of a cardiac event – almost the same risk to your health as smoking!
Gallup surveys revealed that slightly more than one-third of non-executives and non-managers strongly agreed that they understand their company’s brand promise and brand differentiation – and these are the employees who likely interact with customers every day.
“We attended schools eviscerated by budget cuts in an era when kids weren’t a priority; now many schools have better computers than some offices.” Ted Rall, 1994 http://www.rall.com/rallblog/searchablearchives/essays/marketing-madness-a-postmortem-for-generation-x
Meet the 21 Valedictorians of Medford, OR High school! Ashland High has 10 valedictorians this spring, North Medford High has 10, and South Medford has its 21. Redmond, Oregon – 29 valedictorians.Enterprise High School, Dothan, Al – 34 valedictorians – 1 out of every 12 studentsVanguard High School, Ocala Florida – 25 valedictoriansBluffton High School in Ohio – They only had 9, but that was more than 10% of the graduating class.Richard Sweeney, Millennial Behaviors & Demographics, New Jersey Institute of Technology, December 22, 2006Millennials, by their own admission, have no tolerance for delays. They expect their services instantly when they are ready. They require almost constant feedback to know how they are progressing. Their worst nightmare is when they are delayed, required to wait in line, or have to deal with some other unproductive process. Their desire for speed and efficiency can not be over estimated. The need for speedy satisfaction, or as some believe instant gratification, permeates virtually all of their service expectations.Engagement requires recognition but also appreciation. What’s the difference? It’s something the military understands. Recognition is a medal a soldier is awarded posthumously. Appreciation is a letter that comes from a commanding officer describing the contributions of the fallen soldier.
Father knows best. Father Knows Best was the classic wholesome family situation comedy. It was set in the typical Midwestern community of Springfield, where Jim Anderson was an agent for the General Insurance Company. Every evening he would come home from work, take off his sport jacket, put on his comfortable sweater, and deal with the everyday problems of a growing family. In contrast to most other family comedies of the period, in which one of the other parents was a blundering idiot, both Jim and his wife Margaret were portrayed as thoughtful, responsible adults. When a family crisis arose, Jim would clam the waters with a warm smile and some sensible advice. Leave it to beaver Leave It to Beaver portrayed the iconic postwar American family: June the perfect housewife, Ward the dad (what did he do for a living, anyway? And why did he always wear a suit to dinner?), big brother Wally, and of course Theodore ("The Beaver"), the good-hearted kid whose adventures propelled the show. Leave It to Beaver debuted in October of 1957 on CBS. In the fall of 1958, CBS dropped the series. ABC picked it up and ran it for an additional 5 years.Andy Griffith Show 1960-1968.The Andy Griffith Show is definitely a TV classic. It ran from 1960 to 1968, producing 249 episodes.The main character, Andy (Andy Griffith), was a widowed father of the polite little boy named Opie (Ron Howard) and is a sheriff, who works with nervous and very suspecting Barney Fife (Don Knotts). They all live in the nice southern town of Mayberry. But, Mayberry can get a little dangerous when the town drunk Otis Campbell (Hal Smith) is on the loose. Thelma Lou (Betty Lynn) is Barney's sweetheart, although Andy had to help him describe his feelings to her. Aunt Bee (Frances Bavier) is the very loving and caring, but stern housekeeper for Andy and Opie. Donna Reed show The Donna Reed Show premiered on September 24, 1958, on ABC. The show revolves around housewife, Donna Stone, and her family--husband Alex who is a pediatrician, 14 year-old Mary, and 11 year-old Jeff. The Stone family reside in the midwestern town of Hilldale. Donna was the perfect American housewife and mother. She was always neatly-groomed, lovely, good-natured, thoughtful, and capable. Alex was handsome, well-respected in his profession, usually thoughtful and sometimes ill-tempered. Mary was a typical teenage girl of the time, pretty, popular, and prone to bouts of insecurity now and then. Jeff was the average boy, rambunctious, bright, preferred sports to studies, and a total burden to his sister. The episodes involved the usual family problems and adventures, with Donna usually saving the day in her quiet, capable way.
I think there are three key reasons why the Millennials think so differently from you Both the Boomers and the Millennials average about 4.5 million people per year. So in 1965, the Boomers were competing with 4.5 million potential workers in an economy of 71 million jobs, while the same number of Millennials are today competing in an economy twice that size. So the boomers had to stay late, had to show up on Saturday, had to have "face time" with the boss so that you would get noticed; there were four or five other people that could or would take that job if you didn't keep it. Today's 25 year old millienial simply does not face that same type of challenge. On top of that, for the first time in history, the youngest generation in the workforce possesses technological skill dominance over the older, supervising generations. So, not only is the competition much less to get a job for these workers, they may often have better skills than the people who have just hired and are supervising them.
It should be no surprise that this generation, with its values orientation reinforced by media and culture reacted strongly against what it perceived to be injustice. As we will see with the other generations, the Boomers retain that childhood programming.
Finally, the third explanation is that Millennials have also radically redefined expectations of their value and ability to contribute to success. And what's more, their parents encouraged them to think that. Parents demanded explanations from teachers for bad test scores and grades. Parents complained to the principal when Billy got in the honor society and Johnny did not. Parents borrowed the money for questionable degrees instead of more vocationally oriented courses of study. Parents sent them to summer camps every year instead of asking them to get a job. As the old 1980s PSA about drugs used to say “I learned it by watching you.”
The second explanation is that they have a dramatically different view of time. As Cam Marston says in Managing the What’s in it for Me Workforce:To the Boomers and Matures, time was something they had to invest in their careers. They became workaholics because they invested their extra time back into their work. To them, time is/was cheap, and giving it back to an employer through long hours of work was expected. To Gen Xers and New Milliennials, time is expensive and needs to be controlled as closely and tightly as money itself. Time has become a very real currency, just like dollars themselves, and giving control of it to the workplace is definitely not a part of a plan to become successful. When I look at my own kids, and how overscheduled they are today and know that the millennials grew up in that same environment, I can appreciate how they value control of their time.Richard Sweeney, Millennial Behaviors & Demographics, New Jersey Institute of Technology, December 22, 2006Millennials prefer to keep their time and commitments flexible longer in order to take advantage of better options; they also expect other people and institutions to give them more flexibility. They want to “time and place shift” their services, to have them where and when they are ready. They want more granularity in the services so they can be interrupted and finish when they are ready without any loss or productivity.
This presents a lot of challenges for employers. Obviously they can’t work forever. Understand how to structure succession planning, and how to handle ADA/job difficulty requirements. –in 2010, a survey by the Administration on Aging revealed that 37% of people over the age of 65 reported some type of disability. http://www.aoa.gov/Aging_Statistics/Profile/2011/docs/2011profile.pdf
According to a 2004 marketing study about generational differences, my age cohort "went through its all-important, formative years as one of the least parented, least nurtured generations in U.S. history." Census data show that almost half of us come from split families; 40% were latch-key kids.
they are the bench strength for leadership, the skill bearers and knowledge experts corporations will rely on to gain competitive advantage in the coming decades. Approaching or already in the prime of their lives and careers, they are prepared and poised for leadership. Thwarted by Boomers who can’t afford to retire and threatened by the prospect of leap-frogging Millennials, 41 percent of Xers are unsatisfied with their current rate of advancement and 49 percent feel stalled in their careers.37 percent of Xers are planning to leave their current employer in the next three years.This generation has triple strengths: outsized ambition, enormous self-reliance and unflagging resilience. All three were inculcated into this cohort by the social, cultural and economic environment in which they grew up; all three have been enhanced by the circumstances shaping Gen X’s adulthood.Rev. Amy Zeittlow,Lessons from American Girl Dolls, Gen X, and Divorce, Huffington Post, March 13, 2013 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rev-amy-ziettlow/lessons-from-american-gir_b_2807740.htmlAs my daughter and I flipped through the catalogue discussing the dolls' merits, we found ourselves gravitating to Julie Albright from 1974. I thought, A Gen X doll! Cool! I'm Gen X! I wondered what historical event of the 70's American Girl might highlight that had changed Julie's life forever. Nixon? Inflation? Journalist Stephanie Obley summarizes Julie's story: "Julie Albright's life is changing. The 9-year-old's parents have just divorced and she now lives in an apartment a few miles from her childhood home. She misses her best friend, her pet rabbit and most of all, her father. Holidays are difficult. She doesn't want to tell her friends about the divorce."I had been reading each doll's bio out loud, enjoying a warm mother-daughter moment, but my daughter's face fell as she heard Julie's story. "Well, that's SAD!" she cried out. I quickly noted to myself that we had already read about dolls living through war, slavery, and persecution, all very sad. But then I realized that for most young children reading the American Girl catalogue, war, slavery, and persecution do not live with them; their parents do. So, for a daughter like mine, the saddest doll is the divorce doll.
Six million dollar man – independent agent of government who undergoes technological modifications after an accident and fights injustice.
Everyone know what this is? The seagull. What does a seagull do? It soars in, flies around and squawks, then leaves. Any one ever have the seagull manager? Are you a seagull?First thing is don’t be a seagull.Richard Sweeney said “Millennials are interested in processes and services that work and speed their interactions. They prefer merit systems to others (e.g. seniority). Millennials are furious when they feel they are wasting their time; they want to learn what they have to learn quickly and move on. Millennials have no tolerance for services that do not continuously and reliably work. Example, if a student believes that a particular teacher is ineffective, he or she will do whatever it takes to find another teacher, even taking a distance education class. “
This presents a lot of challenges for employers. Obviously they can’t work forever. Understand how to structure succession planning, and how to handle ADA/job difficulty requirements. –in 2010, a survey by the Administration on Aging revealed that 37% of people over the age of 65 reported some type of disability. http://www.aoa.gov/Aging_Statistics/Profile/2011/docs/2011profile.pdf
Penelope Trunk - “But the real trend that we really have here is that Generation X puts parenting before anything else—even men. Gen X is horrified by the self-centered parenting that they received. And Gen X is an inherently revolutionary generation. We have little to lose: We are the first generation in American history to earn less than our parents.” -2007Penelope Trunk - “NattavudhPowdthavee, an economist at the University of London who studies money and happiness, points out that earning a lot of money and maintaining intimate relationships both take a lot of time. So you have to decide where your time is best spent.”-2007
We tracked the calls and meetings of our trainees and we found they typically fell below their targets. At first I thought it was a reporting issue, but we even installed a call counter and the totals still didn’t improve. We found that they were discouraged by poor results from a lack of training – they never knew what to say. I also believe – although they would not admit it – that they were afraid of calling people on the phone. The phone has fallen out of favor for those under 30. A recent survey showed that over 75% of them send more than 20 texts per day. The survey reports:Among all teens, the frequency of use of texting has now overtaken the frequency of every other common form of interaction with their friends. Fully two-thirds of teen texters say they are more likely to use their cell phones to text their friends than talk to them by cell phone.One millennial describes the phenomenon:"Of course I text people. Usually to tell them to call me. It sure beats having them answer the phone and saying I'll call you back, or leaving a message that then have to listen to, and then call me and maybe get me maybe not."It’s really hard to get a meeting by texting a prospect.
In their book The Psychology of Sales Call Reluctance, Shannon Goodson and George Dudley surveyed 11,000 sales people and found that 80% of new sales people failed because of sales call reluctance. Steve Kloyda describes the phenomenon:“We've all found ourselves on phone calls, lost in no man's land because we were not prepared. The client hears hesitation, discomfort, a shaky voice, and perhaps a less than smooth attempt to right the ship. If we string several of these calls together, our confidence can falter and our reluctance to make the next call deepens.”Goodson and Dudley also discovered that another 40% of experienced sales people reported episodes of sales call reluctance severe enough to potentially end their careers in sales. We tracked the calls and meetings of our trainees and we found they typically fell below their targets. At first I thought it was a reporting issue, but we even installed a call counter and the totals still didn’t improve. We found that they were discouraged by poor results from a lack of training – they never knew what to say. I also believe – although they would not admit it – that they were afraid of calling people on the phone.
More than anything, these workers need your leadership and guidance, and your recognition that they are on the path to success. And outside of time, setting up these kinds of programs is mostly free. Those lessons are applicable to any industry. Sales is the key challenge for this generation. A 2011 survey by CSO Insight showed that sales people only spend about 41% of their time selling.A little more than 41 percent is spent selling by phone or face-to-face. The survey also pointed to a very clear relationship between time spent with customers and sales reps making quota. For example, salespeople who spent 35 percent or less of their time selling by phone or face-to-face achieved quota only 55 percent of the time; however when salespeople spent more than 45 percent of their time selling, the chances of them making quota went up to 62 percent. More belly-to-belly selling time fattens salespeople’s wallets.
We measured calls, meetings, and revenue per transaction. Over the course of a year, we found our trainees were 6,000 calls short of their targets – only about 15 calls per week per associate short.
We were able to show that the short fall – 15 calls per week – based on call to meeting ratios, deal closing ratios and average commissions – resulted in $250,000 in lost opportunities.This is the kind of data we started integrating into our onboarding materials. Although this shortfall represented a small percentage of the company’s revenue, it should have represented about $20,000 per new agent – a significant amount for trainees who worked on straight commission.
Lt Col Om Prakash, who trains fighter pilots for the Air Force, says:You should be glad if with your help the new Airman learns their job better than you, not discouraged. You should be proud if your student can one day fly feats beyond your skill, not envious. You should feel the greatest satisfaction if one day your subordinate can do your job better than you ever did, not disparaging. For this is the ultimate in achievement …. The next generation must be more than ready to fill our shoes; they must be ready to run faster in them. Thank you.