SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  21
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL COLLECTION
PERIOD FOR RETURNED PRODUCTS IN A
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENT
- Shashank Kapadia
- Dr. Emanuel Melachrinoudis
2
• Introduction
– What is Supply Chain?
– Components of Reverse Supply Chain
– Importance and Impact
– Focus of this work
• Problem Definition
• Mathematical Formulation
– Generalized model
– Special Case: Poisson Distribution
– An Illustrative Example
• Conclusion and Future Work
Outline
3
• What is “Supply Chain”?
– The sequence of processes involved in the production and
distribution of a commodity
Introduction
Supply Chain
Forward Supply Chain Reverse Supply Chain
4
• What is “Supply Chain”?
– The sequence of processes involved in the production and
distribution of a commodity
Introduction
Supply Chain
Forward Supply Chain Reverse Supply Chain
5
Components/
Raw Materials
Manufacturers
Wholesalers/
Distributors
Retailers
Customers
• What is “Supply Chain”?
– The sequence of processes involved in the production and
distribution of a commodity
Introduction
6
Components/
Raw Materials
Manufacturers
Wholesalers/
Distributors
Retailers
Customers
Supply Chain
Forward Supply Chain Reverse Supply Chain
• Components of Reverse Supply Chain
Introduction
7
Reverse Supply Chain
Product
Acquisition
Inspection and
Disposition
Reverse Logistics Reconditioning
Distribution and
Sale
• Importance
– Environmental (regulations, consumer pressure etc.)
– Economic (value of used products, cost reduction etc.)
• Impact
– Macro level
• 20% of that is sold is returned
• According to Reverse Logistics Association, the volume of annual returns is
estimated between $150 billion and $200 billion at cost
• ~6% of the Census Bureau’s figure of $3.5 trillion total of US retail
• 21% increase in product returns cost in US electronics consumer and manufacturers
market since 2007, by Accenture in 2011
– Micro level
• Supply chain costs associated with reverse logistics average between 7% - 10% of
costs of goods
• Average manufacturer spends 9% - 15% of total revenue on returns
Importance and Impact
8
Focus of this Work
9
Supply Chain
Forward Supply
Chain
Reverse Supply
Chain
Product
Acquisition
Reverse Logistics
Distribution
Production
Planning
Inventory
Inspection and
Disposition
Reconditioning
Distribution and
resale
Specifically on the
collection of returned
products and the
economic driving force
that can bring direct
gains to the companies
in terms of cost
reduction
Problem Definition
10
Returned
Products
ICP3
ICP2
ICP1
CRC2
CRC1
Figure 1: Reverse logistics structure
Problem Definition
11
ICP CRC
• Objective
– To determine the finite collection time at an ICP before sending it to the CRC
• Prior work
– Although, the work has been done on reverse logistics in past, it is diverse and
heterogeneous. Recently, the dynamic interplay between shipping volume and the
collection period was examined
We propose a generalized model for stochastic product returns where the
rate of returns follows a discrete probability distribution
Figure 2: Sub-problem with one ICP and one CRC
Problem Definition
12
ICP
Inventory Cost Shipping Cost
$-
$5,000.00
$10,000.00
$15,000.00
$20,000.00
$25,000.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Annualcost($)
Collection period (t days)
Annual Costs at ICP
Inventory Cost Shipping Cost
$18,000.00
$20,000.00
$22,000.00
$24,000.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Collection period (t days)
Total Annual Cost at ICP
Total Annual cost
Mathematical
Formulation
Indices
𝑖 Index for time periods in days
Decision Variables
𝑇 Length of the collection period in days
Model Parameters
𝑏
Daily inventory cost per unit, including the penalty of holding a
unit one more day
𝑤 Annual working days
𝑌𝑖
Discrete random variable representing the number of returned
products on the 𝑖 𝑡ℎ
day from all the customers; 𝑌𝑖 are assumed to
be independent and identically distributed random variables
according to a discrete mass function 𝑓 𝑦 = Pr 𝑌𝑖 = 𝑦
𝐹 Standard freight rate
𝛼𝑙
Freight discount rate depending on shipment volume from the
ICP to the CRC, 𝑙 = 1, … , 𝑚 and 𝛼0 = 1
𝑃𝑙
Preselected shipment volume breakpoints,𝑙 = 1, … , 𝑚 as shown
in Figure 3
The volume of accumulated returned
products over the period of 𝑡 days
as 𝑍(𝑡) = 𝑖=1
𝑡
𝑌𝑖.
The objective is to determine the
collection period 𝑇 for returned
products at ICP that minimizes the total
annual cost which is the sum of annual
inventory cost and annual shipping
cost.
Minimize: Total Annual Cost
(Annual Shipping Cost + Annual
Inventory Cost)
Assumptions:
1. Sufficient capacity
2. No transportation cost from
customers to ICP
3. Returned products are of same
kind
13
Mathematical
Formulation
Inventory Cost
The cost associated with storing the
returned products at the ICP.
The expected annual inventory
cost 𝔼 𝐼𝐶𝑌 𝑡 can be derived as
𝐼𝐶 1 = 𝑏𝑌1
𝐼𝐶 2 = 𝑏𝑌1 + 𝑏 𝑌1 + 𝑌2
= 𝑏 2𝑌1 + 𝑌2
𝐼𝐶 𝑡 = 𝑏 𝑡𝑌1 + 𝑡 − 1 𝑌2 + ⋯ + 𝑌𝑡
𝔼 𝐼𝐶 𝑡 =
𝑏𝑡 𝑡 + 1
2 𝑦
𝑦𝑓(𝑦)
Therefore, accounting for
𝑤
𝑡
cycles in a
year, we have
𝔼 𝑰𝑪𝒀 𝒕 =
𝒃𝒘 𝒕 + 𝟏
𝟐 𝒚
𝒚𝒇(𝒚)
14
$-
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$6,000.00
$8,000.00
$10,000.00
$12,000.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Annualcost($)
Collection period (t days)
Expected Annual Inventory Cost at ICP
Inventory Cost
Mathematical
Formulation
Shipping Cost
The shipping cost is a function of accumulated
returned products over the collection period of 𝑡
days,𝑍(𝑡), and the freight discount rate.
The shipping cost can be expressed as:
𝑆𝐶 𝑡
=
𝐹𝛼𝑙 𝑍(𝑡)
𝐹𝛼 𝑚 𝑍(𝑡)
𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑙−1 ≤ 𝑍 𝑡 < 𝑃𝑙, 𝑙 = 1, … , 𝑚
𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑚 ≤ 𝑍 𝑡
By defining another breakpoint at infinity,
i.e.𝑃 𝑚+1 = ∞, we can express above equation as:
𝑆𝐶 𝑡 = 𝐹𝛼𝑙 𝑍 𝑡 , 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑙−1 ≤ 𝑍 𝑡 < 𝑃𝑙, 𝑙 =
1, … , 𝑚 + 1, and its expected value can be
expressed as
𝔼 𝑆𝐶 𝑡 = 𝐹
𝑙=1
𝑚+1
𝛼𝑙−1
𝑘=𝑃 𝑙−1
𝑃 𝑙−1
𝑘𝑓𝑍 𝑡
𝑘
Therefore, accounting for
𝑤
𝑡
cycles in a year, we
have
𝔼 𝑺𝑪𝒀 𝒕
=
𝑭𝒘
𝒕
𝒍=𝟏
𝒎+𝟏
𝜶𝒍−𝟏
𝒌=𝑷𝒍−𝟏
𝑷𝒍−𝟏
𝒌𝒇 𝒁 𝒕
𝒌
15
$9,000.00
$11,000.00
$13,000.00
$15,000.00
$17,000.00
$19,000.00
$21,000.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Annualcost($)
Collection period (t days)
Expected Annual Shipping Cost at ICP
Shipping Cost
𝐹𝛼 𝑚𝐹 𝐹𝛼1 𝐹𝛼2 𝐹𝛼3 …
𝑃0 = 0 𝑃1 𝑃2 𝑃3 𝑃𝑚
Figure 3: Preselected shipment volume breakpoints
Mathematical
Formulation
𝔼 𝑆𝐶𝑌 𝑡
=
𝐹𝑤
𝑡
𝑙=1
𝑚+1
𝛼𝑙−1
𝑘=𝑃 𝑙−1
𝑃 𝑙−1
𝑘𝑓𝑍 𝑡
𝑘
Above equation can be simplified
using approximation as:
𝔼 𝑺𝑪 𝒕 ≅ 𝑭𝜶∗
𝒕 𝔼 𝒁 𝒕
where,
𝜶∗
𝒕 =
𝒍=𝟏
𝒎+𝟏
𝜶𝒍−𝟏
𝒌=𝑷𝒍−𝟏
𝑷𝒍−𝟏
𝒇 𝒁 𝒕
𝒌
𝜶∗
𝒕 can be considered as the
effective discount rate.
The approximation was extensively
tested and was found to be quite good.
16
$-
$5,000.00
$10,000.00
$15,000.00
$20,000.00
$25,000.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Annualcost($)
Collection period (t days)
Shipping Cost Approximation
Comparison
Shipping Cost Theoretical(Approx) Shipping Cost Theoretical (Exact)
• Let us now assume that 𝑌𝑖, 𝑖 = 1, … , 𝑡 are independent and identically distributed random
variables following the Poisson distribution with mean 𝜆 = 𝑟. Then 𝑍 𝑡 ~𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑛 𝑟𝑡 .
• The expected annual inventory cost:
𝔼 𝑰𝑪𝒀 𝒕 =
𝒃𝒘𝒓 𝒕 + 𝟏
𝟐
• The expected annual shipping cost:
𝔼 𝑺𝑪𝒀 𝒕 ≅ 𝑭𝒘𝒓𝜶∗
𝒕 ≅ 𝑭𝒘𝒓
𝒍=𝟏
𝒎+𝟏
𝜶𝒍−𝟏
𝒌=𝑷 𝒍−𝟏
𝑷 𝒍−𝟏
𝒇 𝒁 𝒕
𝒌
• The total cost which is the sum of inventory cost and the shipping cost can be expressed as
𝑬 𝑻𝑪𝒀 𝒕 ≅
𝒃𝒘𝒓 𝒕 + 𝟏
𝟐
+ 𝑭𝒘𝒓𝜶∗
𝒕
Special Case: Poisson Distribution
17
Special Case:
Poisson
Distribution
Proposition 1
Based on the approximation and
extensive simulation, there is drop
in expected annual total cost
wherever,
𝜶∗
𝒕 − 𝟏 − 𝜶∗
𝒕 >
𝒃
𝟐𝑭
Reduction in the number of
possibilities for optimal collection
period.
∎
18
Collection
Period t (days)
Total Cost α*(t) α*(t-1)-α*(t)
1 $ 22,000.00 1.000
2 $ 22,993.54 1.000 0.000
3 $ 20,011.88 0.801 0.199
4 $ 21,000.00 0.800 0.001
5 $ 21,965.98 0.799 0.001
6 $ 19,296.21 0.618 0.181
7 $ 19,893.86 0.596 0.022
8 $ 19,098.54 0.506 0.090
9 $ 20,000.00 0.500 0.006
10 $ 21,000.00 0.500 0.000
Table 1: Results that illustrate Proposition
An Illustrative
Example
We consider a cluster of
customers where the total daily
returns volume follows a Poisson
distribution with 𝒓 = 𝟖𝟎, the
daily inventory cost 𝒃 = 𝟎. 𝟏, the
unit standard freight rate is 𝑭 = 𝟏
and the annual working days
are 𝒘 = 𝟐𝟓𝟎. All the customers
return products to a single
designated ICP and subsequently
the products are collected during a
period 𝑇 before they are shipped
to a single designated CRC. The
shipment volume breakpoints
are 𝑷 𝟏= 𝟐𝟎𝟎, 𝑷 𝟐 = 𝟒𝟓𝟎
and 𝑷 𝟑= 𝟔𝟓𝟎, beyond which the
freight discount rate decreases
to 𝜶 𝟏= 𝟎. 𝟖, 𝜶 𝟐 = 𝟎. 𝟔 and 𝜶 𝟑=
𝟎. 𝟓, respectively.
19
Time Period Inventory Cost Shipping Cost Total Cost
1 $ 2,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 22,000.00
2 $ 3,000.00 $ 19,993.54 $ 22,993.54
3 $ 4,000.00 $ 16,011.88 $ 20,011.88
4 $ 5,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 21,000.00
5 $ 6,000.00 $ 15,965.98 $ 21,965.98
6 $ 7,000.00 $ 12,296.21 $ 19,296.21
7 $ 8,000.00 $ 11,893.86 $ 19,893.86
8 $ 9,000.00 $ 10,098.54 $ 19,098.54
9 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 20,000.00
10 $ 11,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 21,000.00
$18,000.00
$19,000.00
$20,000.00
$21,000.00
$22,000.00
$23,000.00
$24,000.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Annualcost($)
Collection period (t days)
Expected Annual Total Cost
Table 2: Expected annual costs
Conclusion and
Future Work
One of the first paper to tackle the reverse
logistics network problem involving random
returned products
The proposed model can aid in coping up
with a new challenge of uncertainty in
product returns
From the theoretical standpoint, the proposed
model was proven to be efficient in
determining a functional relationship between
the expected total inventory cost and the
shipping cost, and with the returns collection
period.
Future work
• The model can be extended to reflect the
continuous time collection period and
freight rates fluctuations
• Future research should be able to tackle
different types of product returns with
multiple ICPs and CRCs
• Model could be validated for large-sized
real-world problems with actual data
20
Time Period
Theoretical Total
Cost
Simulated Total
Cost
Error (%)
1 $ 22,000.00 $ 21,967.99 0.146%
2 $ 22,993.54 $ 23,040.60 -0.204%
3 $ 20,011.88 $ 20,022.07 -0.051%
4 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,007.55 -0.036%
5 $ 21,965.98 $ 22,009.25 -0.197%
6 $ 19,296.21 $ 19,295.07 0.006%
7 $ 19,893.86 $ 19,939.87 -0.231%
8 $ 19,098.54 $ 19,139.38 -0.213%
9 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,052.77 -0.263%
10 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,058.91 -0.280%
THANK YOU
21

Contenu connexe

Similaire à NEDSI-2015_Final

Similaire à NEDSI-2015_Final (20)

Capital budgeting the basics-2
Capital budgeting the basics-2Capital budgeting the basics-2
Capital budgeting the basics-2
 
Capital budegting project and risk analysis
Capital budegting  project and risk analysisCapital budegting  project and risk analysis
Capital budegting project and risk analysis
 
Production & Operarions Management Compre Review
Production & Operarions Management Compre ReviewProduction & Operarions Management Compre Review
Production & Operarions Management Compre Review
 
Principles of economics c13
Principles of economics   c13Principles of economics   c13
Principles of economics c13
 
Dynamic Efficiency and Hotelling's Rule
Dynamic Efficiency and Hotelling's RuleDynamic Efficiency and Hotelling's Rule
Dynamic Efficiency and Hotelling's Rule
 
Inventory management
Inventory managementInventory management
Inventory management
 
Cost 3
Cost 3Cost 3
Cost 3
 
Presentación sin título
Presentación sin títuloPresentación sin título
Presentación sin título
 
Theory of costs, micro economics
Theory of costs, micro economicsTheory of costs, micro economics
Theory of costs, micro economics
 
[231005] - 02. Basic EOQ & EPQ.docx
[231005] - 02. Basic EOQ & EPQ.docx[231005] - 02. Basic EOQ & EPQ.docx
[231005] - 02. Basic EOQ & EPQ.docx
 
Project Control Process
Project Control ProcessProject Control Process
Project Control Process
 
Eoq model
Eoq modelEoq model
Eoq model
 
fm10e ch 10.pptx
fm10e ch 10.pptxfm10e ch 10.pptx
fm10e ch 10.pptx
 
Cost revenue analysis 1
Cost revenue analysis 1Cost revenue analysis 1
Cost revenue analysis 1
 
Capital budgeting
Capital budgetingCapital budgeting
Capital budgeting
 
Unit iv-2-rp
Unit iv-2-rpUnit iv-2-rp
Unit iv-2-rp
 
Cost accounting
Cost accountingCost accounting
Cost accounting
 
Cost Theory and Estimation
Cost Theory and EstimationCost Theory and Estimation
Cost Theory and Estimation
 
Ch14. inventory management
Ch14. inventory managementCh14. inventory management
Ch14. inventory management
 
ECONOMIC ORDER QTY
ECONOMIC ORDER QTYECONOMIC ORDER QTY
ECONOMIC ORDER QTY
 

NEDSI-2015_Final

  • 1.
  • 2. DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL COLLECTION PERIOD FOR RETURNED PRODUCTS IN A STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENT - Shashank Kapadia - Dr. Emanuel Melachrinoudis 2
  • 3. • Introduction – What is Supply Chain? – Components of Reverse Supply Chain – Importance and Impact – Focus of this work • Problem Definition • Mathematical Formulation – Generalized model – Special Case: Poisson Distribution – An Illustrative Example • Conclusion and Future Work Outline 3
  • 4. • What is “Supply Chain”? – The sequence of processes involved in the production and distribution of a commodity Introduction Supply Chain Forward Supply Chain Reverse Supply Chain 4
  • 5. • What is “Supply Chain”? – The sequence of processes involved in the production and distribution of a commodity Introduction Supply Chain Forward Supply Chain Reverse Supply Chain 5 Components/ Raw Materials Manufacturers Wholesalers/ Distributors Retailers Customers
  • 6. • What is “Supply Chain”? – The sequence of processes involved in the production and distribution of a commodity Introduction 6 Components/ Raw Materials Manufacturers Wholesalers/ Distributors Retailers Customers Supply Chain Forward Supply Chain Reverse Supply Chain
  • 7. • Components of Reverse Supply Chain Introduction 7 Reverse Supply Chain Product Acquisition Inspection and Disposition Reverse Logistics Reconditioning Distribution and Sale
  • 8. • Importance – Environmental (regulations, consumer pressure etc.) – Economic (value of used products, cost reduction etc.) • Impact – Macro level • 20% of that is sold is returned • According to Reverse Logistics Association, the volume of annual returns is estimated between $150 billion and $200 billion at cost • ~6% of the Census Bureau’s figure of $3.5 trillion total of US retail • 21% increase in product returns cost in US electronics consumer and manufacturers market since 2007, by Accenture in 2011 – Micro level • Supply chain costs associated with reverse logistics average between 7% - 10% of costs of goods • Average manufacturer spends 9% - 15% of total revenue on returns Importance and Impact 8
  • 9. Focus of this Work 9 Supply Chain Forward Supply Chain Reverse Supply Chain Product Acquisition Reverse Logistics Distribution Production Planning Inventory Inspection and Disposition Reconditioning Distribution and resale Specifically on the collection of returned products and the economic driving force that can bring direct gains to the companies in terms of cost reduction
  • 11. Problem Definition 11 ICP CRC • Objective – To determine the finite collection time at an ICP before sending it to the CRC • Prior work – Although, the work has been done on reverse logistics in past, it is diverse and heterogeneous. Recently, the dynamic interplay between shipping volume and the collection period was examined We propose a generalized model for stochastic product returns where the rate of returns follows a discrete probability distribution Figure 2: Sub-problem with one ICP and one CRC
  • 12. Problem Definition 12 ICP Inventory Cost Shipping Cost $- $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $25,000.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Annualcost($) Collection period (t days) Annual Costs at ICP Inventory Cost Shipping Cost $18,000.00 $20,000.00 $22,000.00 $24,000.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Collection period (t days) Total Annual Cost at ICP Total Annual cost
  • 13. Mathematical Formulation Indices 𝑖 Index for time periods in days Decision Variables 𝑇 Length of the collection period in days Model Parameters 𝑏 Daily inventory cost per unit, including the penalty of holding a unit one more day 𝑤 Annual working days 𝑌𝑖 Discrete random variable representing the number of returned products on the 𝑖 𝑡ℎ day from all the customers; 𝑌𝑖 are assumed to be independent and identically distributed random variables according to a discrete mass function 𝑓 𝑦 = Pr 𝑌𝑖 = 𝑦 𝐹 Standard freight rate 𝛼𝑙 Freight discount rate depending on shipment volume from the ICP to the CRC, 𝑙 = 1, … , 𝑚 and 𝛼0 = 1 𝑃𝑙 Preselected shipment volume breakpoints,𝑙 = 1, … , 𝑚 as shown in Figure 3 The volume of accumulated returned products over the period of 𝑡 days as 𝑍(𝑡) = 𝑖=1 𝑡 𝑌𝑖. The objective is to determine the collection period 𝑇 for returned products at ICP that minimizes the total annual cost which is the sum of annual inventory cost and annual shipping cost. Minimize: Total Annual Cost (Annual Shipping Cost + Annual Inventory Cost) Assumptions: 1. Sufficient capacity 2. No transportation cost from customers to ICP 3. Returned products are of same kind 13
  • 14. Mathematical Formulation Inventory Cost The cost associated with storing the returned products at the ICP. The expected annual inventory cost 𝔼 𝐼𝐶𝑌 𝑡 can be derived as 𝐼𝐶 1 = 𝑏𝑌1 𝐼𝐶 2 = 𝑏𝑌1 + 𝑏 𝑌1 + 𝑌2 = 𝑏 2𝑌1 + 𝑌2 𝐼𝐶 𝑡 = 𝑏 𝑡𝑌1 + 𝑡 − 1 𝑌2 + ⋯ + 𝑌𝑡 𝔼 𝐼𝐶 𝑡 = 𝑏𝑡 𝑡 + 1 2 𝑦 𝑦𝑓(𝑦) Therefore, accounting for 𝑤 𝑡 cycles in a year, we have 𝔼 𝑰𝑪𝒀 𝒕 = 𝒃𝒘 𝒕 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝒚 𝒚𝒇(𝒚) 14 $- $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $6,000.00 $8,000.00 $10,000.00 $12,000.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Annualcost($) Collection period (t days) Expected Annual Inventory Cost at ICP Inventory Cost
  • 15. Mathematical Formulation Shipping Cost The shipping cost is a function of accumulated returned products over the collection period of 𝑡 days,𝑍(𝑡), and the freight discount rate. The shipping cost can be expressed as: 𝑆𝐶 𝑡 = 𝐹𝛼𝑙 𝑍(𝑡) 𝐹𝛼 𝑚 𝑍(𝑡) 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑙−1 ≤ 𝑍 𝑡 < 𝑃𝑙, 𝑙 = 1, … , 𝑚 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑚 ≤ 𝑍 𝑡 By defining another breakpoint at infinity, i.e.𝑃 𝑚+1 = ∞, we can express above equation as: 𝑆𝐶 𝑡 = 𝐹𝛼𝑙 𝑍 𝑡 , 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑙−1 ≤ 𝑍 𝑡 < 𝑃𝑙, 𝑙 = 1, … , 𝑚 + 1, and its expected value can be expressed as 𝔼 𝑆𝐶 𝑡 = 𝐹 𝑙=1 𝑚+1 𝛼𝑙−1 𝑘=𝑃 𝑙−1 𝑃 𝑙−1 𝑘𝑓𝑍 𝑡 𝑘 Therefore, accounting for 𝑤 𝑡 cycles in a year, we have 𝔼 𝑺𝑪𝒀 𝒕 = 𝑭𝒘 𝒕 𝒍=𝟏 𝒎+𝟏 𝜶𝒍−𝟏 𝒌=𝑷𝒍−𝟏 𝑷𝒍−𝟏 𝒌𝒇 𝒁 𝒕 𝒌 15 $9,000.00 $11,000.00 $13,000.00 $15,000.00 $17,000.00 $19,000.00 $21,000.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Annualcost($) Collection period (t days) Expected Annual Shipping Cost at ICP Shipping Cost 𝐹𝛼 𝑚𝐹 𝐹𝛼1 𝐹𝛼2 𝐹𝛼3 … 𝑃0 = 0 𝑃1 𝑃2 𝑃3 𝑃𝑚 Figure 3: Preselected shipment volume breakpoints
  • 16. Mathematical Formulation 𝔼 𝑆𝐶𝑌 𝑡 = 𝐹𝑤 𝑡 𝑙=1 𝑚+1 𝛼𝑙−1 𝑘=𝑃 𝑙−1 𝑃 𝑙−1 𝑘𝑓𝑍 𝑡 𝑘 Above equation can be simplified using approximation as: 𝔼 𝑺𝑪 𝒕 ≅ 𝑭𝜶∗ 𝒕 𝔼 𝒁 𝒕 where, 𝜶∗ 𝒕 = 𝒍=𝟏 𝒎+𝟏 𝜶𝒍−𝟏 𝒌=𝑷𝒍−𝟏 𝑷𝒍−𝟏 𝒇 𝒁 𝒕 𝒌 𝜶∗ 𝒕 can be considered as the effective discount rate. The approximation was extensively tested and was found to be quite good. 16 $- $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $25,000.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Annualcost($) Collection period (t days) Shipping Cost Approximation Comparison Shipping Cost Theoretical(Approx) Shipping Cost Theoretical (Exact)
  • 17. • Let us now assume that 𝑌𝑖, 𝑖 = 1, … , 𝑡 are independent and identically distributed random variables following the Poisson distribution with mean 𝜆 = 𝑟. Then 𝑍 𝑡 ~𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑛 𝑟𝑡 . • The expected annual inventory cost: 𝔼 𝑰𝑪𝒀 𝒕 = 𝒃𝒘𝒓 𝒕 + 𝟏 𝟐 • The expected annual shipping cost: 𝔼 𝑺𝑪𝒀 𝒕 ≅ 𝑭𝒘𝒓𝜶∗ 𝒕 ≅ 𝑭𝒘𝒓 𝒍=𝟏 𝒎+𝟏 𝜶𝒍−𝟏 𝒌=𝑷 𝒍−𝟏 𝑷 𝒍−𝟏 𝒇 𝒁 𝒕 𝒌 • The total cost which is the sum of inventory cost and the shipping cost can be expressed as 𝑬 𝑻𝑪𝒀 𝒕 ≅ 𝒃𝒘𝒓 𝒕 + 𝟏 𝟐 + 𝑭𝒘𝒓𝜶∗ 𝒕 Special Case: Poisson Distribution 17
  • 18. Special Case: Poisson Distribution Proposition 1 Based on the approximation and extensive simulation, there is drop in expected annual total cost wherever, 𝜶∗ 𝒕 − 𝟏 − 𝜶∗ 𝒕 > 𝒃 𝟐𝑭 Reduction in the number of possibilities for optimal collection period. ∎ 18 Collection Period t (days) Total Cost α*(t) α*(t-1)-α*(t) 1 $ 22,000.00 1.000 2 $ 22,993.54 1.000 0.000 3 $ 20,011.88 0.801 0.199 4 $ 21,000.00 0.800 0.001 5 $ 21,965.98 0.799 0.001 6 $ 19,296.21 0.618 0.181 7 $ 19,893.86 0.596 0.022 8 $ 19,098.54 0.506 0.090 9 $ 20,000.00 0.500 0.006 10 $ 21,000.00 0.500 0.000 Table 1: Results that illustrate Proposition
  • 19. An Illustrative Example We consider a cluster of customers where the total daily returns volume follows a Poisson distribution with 𝒓 = 𝟖𝟎, the daily inventory cost 𝒃 = 𝟎. 𝟏, the unit standard freight rate is 𝑭 = 𝟏 and the annual working days are 𝒘 = 𝟐𝟓𝟎. All the customers return products to a single designated ICP and subsequently the products are collected during a period 𝑇 before they are shipped to a single designated CRC. The shipment volume breakpoints are 𝑷 𝟏= 𝟐𝟎𝟎, 𝑷 𝟐 = 𝟒𝟓𝟎 and 𝑷 𝟑= 𝟔𝟓𝟎, beyond which the freight discount rate decreases to 𝜶 𝟏= 𝟎. 𝟖, 𝜶 𝟐 = 𝟎. 𝟔 and 𝜶 𝟑= 𝟎. 𝟓, respectively. 19 Time Period Inventory Cost Shipping Cost Total Cost 1 $ 2,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 22,000.00 2 $ 3,000.00 $ 19,993.54 $ 22,993.54 3 $ 4,000.00 $ 16,011.88 $ 20,011.88 4 $ 5,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 21,000.00 5 $ 6,000.00 $ 15,965.98 $ 21,965.98 6 $ 7,000.00 $ 12,296.21 $ 19,296.21 7 $ 8,000.00 $ 11,893.86 $ 19,893.86 8 $ 9,000.00 $ 10,098.54 $ 19,098.54 9 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 20,000.00 10 $ 11,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $18,000.00 $19,000.00 $20,000.00 $21,000.00 $22,000.00 $23,000.00 $24,000.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Annualcost($) Collection period (t days) Expected Annual Total Cost Table 2: Expected annual costs
  • 20. Conclusion and Future Work One of the first paper to tackle the reverse logistics network problem involving random returned products The proposed model can aid in coping up with a new challenge of uncertainty in product returns From the theoretical standpoint, the proposed model was proven to be efficient in determining a functional relationship between the expected total inventory cost and the shipping cost, and with the returns collection period. Future work • The model can be extended to reflect the continuous time collection period and freight rates fluctuations • Future research should be able to tackle different types of product returns with multiple ICPs and CRCs • Model could be validated for large-sized real-world problems with actual data 20 Time Period Theoretical Total Cost Simulated Total Cost Error (%) 1 $ 22,000.00 $ 21,967.99 0.146% 2 $ 22,993.54 $ 23,040.60 -0.204% 3 $ 20,011.88 $ 20,022.07 -0.051% 4 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,007.55 -0.036% 5 $ 21,965.98 $ 22,009.25 -0.197% 6 $ 19,296.21 $ 19,295.07 0.006% 7 $ 19,893.86 $ 19,939.87 -0.231% 8 $ 19,098.54 $ 19,139.38 -0.213% 9 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,052.77 -0.263% 10 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,058.91 -0.280%