2. 2 / 92 / 9
Why Do We Need
Continuous Monitoring?
Laboratory sampling
is only a “snapshot”
of the sample on a
good day.
3. 3 / 93 / 9
Sampling At “The Pipe” Does Not Sample
Storm or Irrigation Water
4. 4 / 94 / 9
Sources of Pollution May be
Outside “The Pipe”
5. 5 / 95 / 9
Rarely Do We Sample When Rivers
Are Flooding
Just one more bottle
6. 6 / 96 / 9
But There Are No USEPA Approved
Methods For On-Line Analysis!
EPA approved methods include:
• Sampling
• Preservation
• Calibration verification
• Duplicates
• Spikes
• LCS
7. 7 / 97 / 9
Can Get Around
Sampling and Preservation…
Collection
Manual
Sample
Preserve
Store
Analysis
Physical
Treatment
Chemical
Treatment
Measurement
Reporting
Report
Generation
Review/React
…since analysis is immediate.
8. 8 / 98 / 9
No Lab Report is Created,
No Batch QC
Analysis
Physical
Treatment
Chemical
Treatment
Measurement
Reporting
Report
Generation
Review/React
9. 9 / 99 / 9
A Significant Portion of “Normal” is
Eliminated
Analysis
Physical
Treatment
Chemical
Treatment
Measurement
Reporting
Review/React
10. 10 / 910 / 9
But a Method Includes “Batch” QC
Steps That Must Be Done
Including:
l Calibration and calibration verification
l Blanks
l Duplicates
l Matrix spikes
l Analysis of control samples
11. 11 / 911 / 9
Calibration of On-Line Analyzers
Can Be Automated
l Methods should ensure that analyzers automatically recalibrate.
l Should use multiple points if necessary
l Or, operators should periodically recalibrate.
12. 12 / 912 / 9
Calibration Verification Should Be
Automated
l Methods should ensure that analyzers automatically verify the
calibration in a fixed interval.
l Failed CCV should repeat calibration or flag
13. 13 / 913 / 9
Analyzer Should Run “Blanks” If
Target Analyte Varies
Process control blanks
Ambient water blanks
14. 14 / 914 / 9
The Concept of “Duplicates” Does Not Apply…
• The on-line method should require a way to
collect repeatability data
• Stick the sampling straw in a beaker
…however, precision should be evaluated
15. 15 / 915 / 9
The Concept of “Spikes” Does Not Apply…
• The on-line method should require a way to
determine recovery in the matrix
• Recovery determined on commissioning
…however, recovery should be evaluated
16. 16 / 916 / 9
The Concept of “LCS” Does Not Apply…
• The on-line method should periodically evaluate
an LCS
• LCS defined as comparison to approved method
…however, precision and recovery should be
evaluated
17. 17 / 917 / 9
Example of TN (On-Line)
Compared to TKN (Approved)
0
10
20
30
40
50
11/19/04 11/29/04 12/9/04 12/19/04 12/29/04 1/8/05
AverageTotalNitrogen
(mg/L/day)
Date
TKN vs TN TKN
TN
18. 18 / 918 / 9
Example of TKP (Approved)
Compared to TP (Online)
TPK vs TP
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
11/19/04 11/29/04 12/9/04 12/19/04 12/29/04 1/8/05
Date
AverageTotal
Phosphorus(mg/L/day)
TP Manual
TP
20. 20 / 920 / 9
Any New “Method” For Continuous
On-Line Monitoring Should:
l Obtain equivalent results to approved laboratory methods
l Be “rugged”
l Use few reagents
l Have a sufficient range
l Sample/”handle” a complex matrix
l Calibrate with multiple points
l Require periodic check samples compared to lab
21. 21 / 921 / 9
On-Line Analyzer Must Be Rugged
Enough For Field / Plant Use
22. 22 / 922 / 9
The On-Line Analyzer Should Be Capable of
Sampling Multiple Streams
Multi-Stream Sample Switching Unit
23. 23 / 923 / 9
The On-Line Analyzer Should Be Capable of
Handling TSS, If Needed
Multiple Stream TSS Unit
25. 25 / 925 / 9
On-Line Analyzer Methods Are Needed If
Data Is Reported For Compliance
l Some QC in existing methods does not apply.
l New methods can be written that still provide sufficient QC.
l On-line results should be compared to lab results.
26. 26 / 9
Thank you for viewing this presentation. Should you have any
questions or require additional information about our research,
products or services, please visit our support page:
www.ssi.shimadzu.com/support/ or email wclipps@shimadzu.com.
@shimadzussiFollow us on Twitter
Need More Info?