SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  5
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
 
	
  
Freedom	
  to	
  Marry,	
  Freedom	
  to	
  
Dissent:	
  Why	
  We	
  Must	
  Have	
  Both	
  
A	
  Response	
  to	
  Brandon	
  Eich’s	
  Resignation	
  from	
  Mozilla	
  
The last few years have brought an astonishing moral and political transformation in the American debate over
same-sex marriage and gay equality. This has been a triumph not only for LGBT Americans but for the American
idea. But the breakthrough has brought with it rapidly rising expectations among some supporters of gay marriage
that the debate should now be over. As one advocate recently put it, “It would be enough for me if those people who
are so ignorant or intransigent as to still be anti-gay in 2014 would simply shut up.”
The signatories of this statement are grateful to our friends and allies for their enthusiasm. But we are concerned
that recent events, including the resignation of the CEO of Mozilla under pressure because of an anti-same-sex-
marriage donation he made in 2008, signal an eagerness by some supporters of same-sex marriage to punish
rather than to criticize or to persuade those who disagree. We reject that deeply illiberal impulse, which is both
wrong in principle and poor as politics.
We support same-sex marriage; many of us have worked for it, in some cases for a large portion of our professional
and personal lives. We affirm our unwavering commitment to civic and legal equality, including marriage equality.
At the same time, we also affirm our unwavering commitment to the values of the open society and to vigorous
public debate—the values that have brought us to the brink of victory.
Diversity Is the Natural Consequence of Liberty
The gay rights struggle is about freedom and equality for all. The best and most free society is one that allows the
largest number to live true to their core beliefs and identities. It is a society that allows its members to speak their
minds and shape their own aspirations.
The natural consequence of true liberty is diversity. Unless a society can figure out a way to reach perfect
agreement, conflicting views will be inevitable. Any effort to impose conformity, through government or any other
means, by punishing the misguided for believing incorrectly will impoverish society intellectually and oppress it
politically.
The test of our commitment to liberal principles is not our eagerness to hear ideas we share, but our willingness to
consider seriously those we oppose.
Progress Comes from Persuasion
There is no evidence that Brendan Eich, the Mozilla CEO who resigned over his $1,000 donation to California’s
Proposition 8 campaign, believed in or practiced any form of discrimination against Mozilla’s LGBT employees.
That would be a very different case. He was pressured to leave because of personal political action he took at a time
when a majority of the American public shared his view. And while he acknowledged the pain his donation caused,
he did not publicly “recant,” which some suggested he should have done as the price of keeping his job.
So the issue is cleanly presented: Is opposition to same-sex marriage by itself, expressed in a political campaign,
beyond the pale of tolerable discourse in a free society? We cannot wish away the objections of Christian, Jewish,
and Muslim faith traditions, or browbeat them into submission. Even in our constitutional system, persuasion is a
minority’s first and best strategy. It has served us well and we should not be done with it.
Free Speech Is a Value, Not Just a Law
Much of the rhetoric that emerged in the wake of the Eich incident showed a worrisome turn toward intolerance
and puritanism among some supporters of gay equality—not in terms of formal legal sanction, to be sure, but in
terms of abandonment of the core liberal values of debate and diversity.
Sustaining a liberal society demands a culture that welcomes robust debate, vigorous political advocacy, and a
decent respect for differing opinions. People must be allowed to be wrong in order to continually test what is right.
We should criticize opposing views, not punish or suppress them.
The freedom—not just legal but social—to express even very unpopular views is the engine that propelled the gay-
rights movement from its birth against almost hopeless odds two generations ago. A culture of free speech created
the social space for us to criticize and demolish the arguments against gay marriage and LGBT equality. For us and
our advocates to turn against that culture now would be a betrayal of the movement’s deepest and most humane
values.
Disagreement Should Not Be Punished
We prefer debate that is respectful, but we cannot enforce good manners. We must have the strength to accept that
some people think misguidedly and harmfully about us. But we must also acknowledge that disagreement is not,
itself, harm or hate.
As a viewpoint, opposition to gay marriage is not a punishable offense. It can be expressed hatefully, but it can also
be expressed respectfully. We strongly believe that opposition to same-sex marriage is wrong, but the consequence
of holding a wrong opinion should not be the loss of a job. Inflicting such consequences on others is sadly ironic in
light of our movement’s hard-won victory over a social order in which LGBT people were fired, harassed, and
socially marginalized for holding unorthodox opinions.
Enforcing Orthodoxy Hurts Everyone
LGBT Americans can and do demand to be treated fairly. But we also recognize that absolute agreement on any
issue does not exist. Franklin Kameny, one of America’s earliest and greatest gay-rights proponents, lost his job in
1957 because he was gay. Just as some now celebrate Eich’s departure as simply reflecting market demands, the
government justified the firing of gay people because of “the possible embarrassment to, and loss of public
confidence in . . . the Federal civil service.” Kameny devoted his life to fighting back. He was both tireless and
confrontational in his advocacy of equality, but he never tried to silence or punish his adversaries.
Now that we are entering a new season in the debate that Frank Kameny helped to open, it is important to live up
to the standard he set. Like him, we place our confidence in persuasion, not punishment. We believe it is the only
truly secure path to equal rights.
SIGNATORIES
Affiliations and employers are for identification purposes only
Jonathan Adler
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Kenneth Anderson
American University Washington College of Law
Brian Bix
University of Minnesota Law School
David Blankenhorn
President, Institute for American Values
Reginald J. Brown
Partner, WilmerHale
Jim Burroway
Box Turtle Bulletin
Steven G. Calabresi
Northwestern University Law School
Dale Carpenter
University of Minnesota Law School
Brian Chase
Former senior staff attorney, Lambda Legal Defense
and Education Fund
James Chen
Michigan State University Law School
Jeff Cook-McCormac
Senior Advisor, American Unity Fund
John Corvino
Wayne State University
Donald Downs
University of Wisconsin—Madison
Beth Elliott
Daughters of Bilitis
California Committee for Sexual Law Reform
Richard Epstein
New York University School of Law
William A. Galston
The Brookings Institution
Margaret Hoover
President, American Unity Fund
Lisa Graham Keegan
Former Arizona State Superintendent of Public
Instruction
Timothy Kincaid
Box Turtle Bulletin
Gregory J. King
HRCF Communications Director, 1989-1995
James Kirchick
The Daily Beast
Heidi Kitrosser
University of Minnesota Law School
Jim Kolbe
Former member, U.S. House of Representatives
David Lampo
Author, “A Fundamental Freedom”
Log Cabin Republicans
Eli Lehrer
President, R Street Institute
James Lindgren
Northwestern University Law School
David Link
Fred Litwin
Fabulous Blue Tent
Brett McDonnell
University of Minnesota Law School
William McGeveran
University of Minnesota Law School
Ken Mehlman
Businessman; 62nd Chairman, Republican National
Committee
Stephen H. Miller
Independent Gay Forum/IGF Culture Watch
Charles Murray
American Enterprise Institute
Norman Ornstein
American Enterprise Institute
Richard Painter
University of Minnesota Law School
Branden Petersen
Minnesota State Senate
Mark Pietrzyk
David Post
Temple University School of Law
Randy R. Potts
Box Turtle Bulletin
Joe Radinovich
Minnesota State House of Representatives
Jonathan Rauch
The Brookings Institution
Stephen Richer
The University of Chicago Law School
Purple Elephant Republicans
Jonathan W. Rowe
Mercer County Community College
Will Saletan
Slate.com
Robert Sarvis
2014 U.S. Senate candidate, Virginia
Sally Satel
American Enterprise Institute
Leah Ward Sears
Partner at Schiff Hardin LLP
Former Georgia Supreme Court Justice.
Rick Sincere
Chairman, Gays and Lesbians for Individual Liberty
Christina Hoff Sommers
Resident Scholar
American Enterprise Institute
Andrew Sullivan
Berin Szoka
President, TechFreedom
Rich Tafel
Public Squared
Peter Thiel
Co-founder, PayPal
Rob Tisinai
Box Turtle Bulletin
Eugene Volokh
UCLA School of Law
Sasha Volokh
Emory Law School
Milan Vydareny
Cathy Young
Contributing Editor, Reason Magazine
	
  

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Group presentation
Group presentationGroup presentation
Group presentationGroup4tkt
 
Lexi's Gay Relationships PowerPoint
Lexi's Gay Relationships PowerPointLexi's Gay Relationships PowerPoint
Lexi's Gay Relationships PowerPointnailtech444
 
Working with lgbt teens final
Working with lgbt teens finalWorking with lgbt teens final
Working with lgbt teens finalHeather Lambert
 
LGBT and Aging presentation
LGBT and Aging presentationLGBT and Aging presentation
LGBT and Aging presentationShelley Ware
 
To keep-our-honor-clean-why-we-must-oppose-the-homosexual-agenda-for-the-mili...
To keep-our-honor-clean-why-we-must-oppose-the-homosexual-agenda-for-the-mili...To keep-our-honor-clean-why-we-must-oppose-the-homosexual-agenda-for-the-mili...
To keep-our-honor-clean-why-we-must-oppose-the-homosexual-agenda-for-the-mili...Daniel H
 
Lgbt movement
Lgbt movementLgbt movement
Lgbt movementVishnu R
 
Hate Crimes On Campus
Hate Crimes On CampusHate Crimes On Campus
Hate Crimes On CampusMark Litwa
 
Gender/LGBT Issues presentation update 2
Gender/LGBT Issues presentation update 2Gender/LGBT Issues presentation update 2
Gender/LGBT Issues presentation update 2RabbitHabits
 
MGP-Presentation-austin garborg
MGP-Presentation-austin garborgMGP-Presentation-austin garborg
MGP-Presentation-austin garborgAustinGarborg
 
Filler ppt-homophobia
Filler ppt-homophobiaFiller ppt-homophobia
Filler ppt-homophobiavisionfiller
 
Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16
Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16
Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16Katy Collins
 
Why do pro sports teams ‘appreciate’ police? It sells tickets.
Why do pro sports teams ‘appreciate’ police? It sells tickets.Why do pro sports teams ‘appreciate’ police? It sells tickets.
Why do pro sports teams ‘appreciate’ police? It sells tickets.John Eilermann St Louis
 

Tendances (20)

Group presentation
Group presentationGroup presentation
Group presentation
 
Lexi's Gay Relationships PowerPoint
Lexi's Gay Relationships PowerPointLexi's Gay Relationships PowerPoint
Lexi's Gay Relationships PowerPoint
 
Working with lgbt teens final
Working with lgbt teens finalWorking with lgbt teens final
Working with lgbt teens final
 
LGBT RIGHTS
LGBT RIGHTSLGBT RIGHTS
LGBT RIGHTS
 
LGBT and Aging presentation
LGBT and Aging presentationLGBT and Aging presentation
LGBT and Aging presentation
 
To keep-our-honor-clean-why-we-must-oppose-the-homosexual-agenda-for-the-mili...
To keep-our-honor-clean-why-we-must-oppose-the-homosexual-agenda-for-the-mili...To keep-our-honor-clean-why-we-must-oppose-the-homosexual-agenda-for-the-mili...
To keep-our-honor-clean-why-we-must-oppose-the-homosexual-agenda-for-the-mili...
 
White privilege
White privilegeWhite privilege
White privilege
 
Lgbt movement
Lgbt movementLgbt movement
Lgbt movement
 
Hate Crimes On Campus
Hate Crimes On CampusHate Crimes On Campus
Hate Crimes On Campus
 
Gender/LGBT Issues presentation update 2
Gender/LGBT Issues presentation update 2Gender/LGBT Issues presentation update 2
Gender/LGBT Issues presentation update 2
 
Fys 1
Fys 1Fys 1
Fys 1
 
LGBT
LGBTLGBT
LGBT
 
Lgbt final
Lgbt finalLgbt final
Lgbt final
 
MGP-Presentation-austin garborg
MGP-Presentation-austin garborgMGP-Presentation-austin garborg
MGP-Presentation-austin garborg
 
Social issues ppt
Social issues pptSocial issues ppt
Social issues ppt
 
Hate crimes
Hate crimesHate crimes
Hate crimes
 
HateCrimeReport2013_FINAL
HateCrimeReport2013_FINALHateCrimeReport2013_FINAL
HateCrimeReport2013_FINAL
 
Filler ppt-homophobia
Filler ppt-homophobiaFiller ppt-homophobia
Filler ppt-homophobia
 
Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16
Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16
Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16
 
Why do pro sports teams ‘appreciate’ police? It sells tickets.
Why do pro sports teams ‘appreciate’ police? It sells tickets.Why do pro sports teams ‘appreciate’ police? It sells tickets.
Why do pro sports teams ‘appreciate’ police? It sells tickets.
 

Similaire à Freedom to Marry, Freedom to Dissent

Discrimination Against Gay Discrimination
Discrimination Against Gay DiscriminationDiscrimination Against Gay Discrimination
Discrimination Against Gay DiscriminationJenny Smith
 
The LGBTQ Movement In The United States
The LGBTQ Movement In The United StatesThe LGBTQ Movement In The United States
The LGBTQ Movement In The United StatesCamella Taylor
 
Gay Rights Persuasive Essay
Gay Rights Persuasive EssayGay Rights Persuasive Essay
Gay Rights Persuasive EssayAngie Willis
 
Same-Sex Adoption In The United States
Same-Sex Adoption In The United StatesSame-Sex Adoption In The United States
Same-Sex Adoption In The United StatesJessica Hill
 
Let Us Legalize Gay Marriage Essay
Let Us Legalize Gay Marriage EssayLet Us Legalize Gay Marriage Essay
Let Us Legalize Gay Marriage EssayRachel Phillips
 
Essay On Homosexual Rights And Equality
Essay On Homosexual Rights And EqualityEssay On Homosexual Rights And Equality
Essay On Homosexual Rights And EqualityBuy Academic Papers UK
 
Gay Marriage And Equal Rights For Same-Sex Marriage
Gay Marriage And Equal Rights For Same-Sex MarriageGay Marriage And Equal Rights For Same-Sex Marriage
Gay Marriage And Equal Rights For Same-Sex MarriageMegan Jones
 
Same-Sex Marriage Argument
Same-Sex Marriage ArgumentSame-Sex Marriage Argument
Same-Sex Marriage ArgumentAnnie Hanson
 
The Reasons Behind Homosexual Discrimination
The Reasons Behind Homosexual DiscriminationThe Reasons Behind Homosexual Discrimination
The Reasons Behind Homosexual DiscriminationCourtney Peterson
 

Similaire à Freedom to Marry, Freedom to Dissent (20)

Gay Marriage Article Summary
Gay Marriage Article SummaryGay Marriage Article Summary
Gay Marriage Article Summary
 
Gay Rights Essays
Gay Rights EssaysGay Rights Essays
Gay Rights Essays
 
Discrimination Against Gay Discrimination
Discrimination Against Gay DiscriminationDiscrimination Against Gay Discrimination
Discrimination Against Gay Discrimination
 
Persuasive Essay Gay Marriage
Persuasive Essay Gay MarriagePersuasive Essay Gay Marriage
Persuasive Essay Gay Marriage
 
Argument Essay On Gay Marriage
Argument Essay On Gay MarriageArgument Essay On Gay Marriage
Argument Essay On Gay Marriage
 
Essay About Religion And Gay Rights
Essay About Religion And Gay RightsEssay About Religion And Gay Rights
Essay About Religion And Gay Rights
 
The LGBTQ Movement In The United States
The LGBTQ Movement In The United StatesThe LGBTQ Movement In The United States
The LGBTQ Movement In The United States
 
Gay Rights Persuasive Essay
Gay Rights Persuasive EssayGay Rights Persuasive Essay
Gay Rights Persuasive Essay
 
Essay On Gay Rights
Essay On Gay RightsEssay On Gay Rights
Essay On Gay Rights
 
Gay Marriage Speech Essay
Gay Marriage Speech EssayGay Marriage Speech Essay
Gay Marriage Speech Essay
 
Same-Sex Adoption In The United States
Same-Sex Adoption In The United StatesSame-Sex Adoption In The United States
Same-Sex Adoption In The United States
 
Essay On Gay Rights
Essay On Gay RightsEssay On Gay Rights
Essay On Gay Rights
 
Reinforcing Gay Marriage
Reinforcing Gay MarriageReinforcing Gay Marriage
Reinforcing Gay Marriage
 
Gay Marriage Controversy
Gay Marriage ControversyGay Marriage Controversy
Gay Marriage Controversy
 
Let Us Legalize Gay Marriage Essay
Let Us Legalize Gay Marriage EssayLet Us Legalize Gay Marriage Essay
Let Us Legalize Gay Marriage Essay
 
Essay On Homosexual Rights And Equality
Essay On Homosexual Rights And EqualityEssay On Homosexual Rights And Equality
Essay On Homosexual Rights And Equality
 
For Gay Marriage
For Gay MarriageFor Gay Marriage
For Gay Marriage
 
Gay Marriage And Equal Rights For Same-Sex Marriage
Gay Marriage And Equal Rights For Same-Sex MarriageGay Marriage And Equal Rights For Same-Sex Marriage
Gay Marriage And Equal Rights For Same-Sex Marriage
 
Same-Sex Marriage Argument
Same-Sex Marriage ArgumentSame-Sex Marriage Argument
Same-Sex Marriage Argument
 
The Reasons Behind Homosexual Discrimination
The Reasons Behind Homosexual DiscriminationThe Reasons Behind Homosexual Discrimination
The Reasons Behind Homosexual Discrimination
 

Dernier

Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..mathiasanna557
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioAlexisTorres963861
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduDreamTamilnadu
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...virgfern3011
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde NewsFeed1
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...University of Canberra
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surchargesEED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surchargesEl Estrecho Digital
 

Dernier (8)

Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
 
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surchargesEED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
 

Freedom to Marry, Freedom to Dissent

  • 1.     Freedom  to  Marry,  Freedom  to   Dissent:  Why  We  Must  Have  Both   A  Response  to  Brandon  Eich’s  Resignation  from  Mozilla  
  • 2. The last few years have brought an astonishing moral and political transformation in the American debate over same-sex marriage and gay equality. This has been a triumph not only for LGBT Americans but for the American idea. But the breakthrough has brought with it rapidly rising expectations among some supporters of gay marriage that the debate should now be over. As one advocate recently put it, “It would be enough for me if those people who are so ignorant or intransigent as to still be anti-gay in 2014 would simply shut up.” The signatories of this statement are grateful to our friends and allies for their enthusiasm. But we are concerned that recent events, including the resignation of the CEO of Mozilla under pressure because of an anti-same-sex- marriage donation he made in 2008, signal an eagerness by some supporters of same-sex marriage to punish rather than to criticize or to persuade those who disagree. We reject that deeply illiberal impulse, which is both wrong in principle and poor as politics. We support same-sex marriage; many of us have worked for it, in some cases for a large portion of our professional and personal lives. We affirm our unwavering commitment to civic and legal equality, including marriage equality. At the same time, we also affirm our unwavering commitment to the values of the open society and to vigorous public debate—the values that have brought us to the brink of victory. Diversity Is the Natural Consequence of Liberty The gay rights struggle is about freedom and equality for all. The best and most free society is one that allows the largest number to live true to their core beliefs and identities. It is a society that allows its members to speak their minds and shape their own aspirations. The natural consequence of true liberty is diversity. Unless a society can figure out a way to reach perfect agreement, conflicting views will be inevitable. Any effort to impose conformity, through government or any other means, by punishing the misguided for believing incorrectly will impoverish society intellectually and oppress it politically. The test of our commitment to liberal principles is not our eagerness to hear ideas we share, but our willingness to consider seriously those we oppose. Progress Comes from Persuasion There is no evidence that Brendan Eich, the Mozilla CEO who resigned over his $1,000 donation to California’s Proposition 8 campaign, believed in or practiced any form of discrimination against Mozilla’s LGBT employees. That would be a very different case. He was pressured to leave because of personal political action he took at a time when a majority of the American public shared his view. And while he acknowledged the pain his donation caused, he did not publicly “recant,” which some suggested he should have done as the price of keeping his job. So the issue is cleanly presented: Is opposition to same-sex marriage by itself, expressed in a political campaign, beyond the pale of tolerable discourse in a free society? We cannot wish away the objections of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim faith traditions, or browbeat them into submission. Even in our constitutional system, persuasion is a minority’s first and best strategy. It has served us well and we should not be done with it. Free Speech Is a Value, Not Just a Law Much of the rhetoric that emerged in the wake of the Eich incident showed a worrisome turn toward intolerance and puritanism among some supporters of gay equality—not in terms of formal legal sanction, to be sure, but in terms of abandonment of the core liberal values of debate and diversity.
  • 3. Sustaining a liberal society demands a culture that welcomes robust debate, vigorous political advocacy, and a decent respect for differing opinions. People must be allowed to be wrong in order to continually test what is right. We should criticize opposing views, not punish or suppress them. The freedom—not just legal but social—to express even very unpopular views is the engine that propelled the gay- rights movement from its birth against almost hopeless odds two generations ago. A culture of free speech created the social space for us to criticize and demolish the arguments against gay marriage and LGBT equality. For us and our advocates to turn against that culture now would be a betrayal of the movement’s deepest and most humane values. Disagreement Should Not Be Punished We prefer debate that is respectful, but we cannot enforce good manners. We must have the strength to accept that some people think misguidedly and harmfully about us. But we must also acknowledge that disagreement is not, itself, harm or hate. As a viewpoint, opposition to gay marriage is not a punishable offense. It can be expressed hatefully, but it can also be expressed respectfully. We strongly believe that opposition to same-sex marriage is wrong, but the consequence of holding a wrong opinion should not be the loss of a job. Inflicting such consequences on others is sadly ironic in light of our movement’s hard-won victory over a social order in which LGBT people were fired, harassed, and socially marginalized for holding unorthodox opinions. Enforcing Orthodoxy Hurts Everyone LGBT Americans can and do demand to be treated fairly. But we also recognize that absolute agreement on any issue does not exist. Franklin Kameny, one of America’s earliest and greatest gay-rights proponents, lost his job in 1957 because he was gay. Just as some now celebrate Eich’s departure as simply reflecting market demands, the government justified the firing of gay people because of “the possible embarrassment to, and loss of public confidence in . . . the Federal civil service.” Kameny devoted his life to fighting back. He was both tireless and confrontational in his advocacy of equality, but he never tried to silence or punish his adversaries. Now that we are entering a new season in the debate that Frank Kameny helped to open, it is important to live up to the standard he set. Like him, we place our confidence in persuasion, not punishment. We believe it is the only truly secure path to equal rights.
  • 4. SIGNATORIES Affiliations and employers are for identification purposes only Jonathan Adler Case Western Reserve University School of Law Kenneth Anderson American University Washington College of Law Brian Bix University of Minnesota Law School David Blankenhorn President, Institute for American Values Reginald J. Brown Partner, WilmerHale Jim Burroway Box Turtle Bulletin Steven G. Calabresi Northwestern University Law School Dale Carpenter University of Minnesota Law School Brian Chase Former senior staff attorney, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund James Chen Michigan State University Law School Jeff Cook-McCormac Senior Advisor, American Unity Fund John Corvino Wayne State University Donald Downs University of Wisconsin—Madison Beth Elliott Daughters of Bilitis California Committee for Sexual Law Reform Richard Epstein New York University School of Law William A. Galston The Brookings Institution Margaret Hoover President, American Unity Fund Lisa Graham Keegan Former Arizona State Superintendent of Public Instruction Timothy Kincaid Box Turtle Bulletin Gregory J. King HRCF Communications Director, 1989-1995 James Kirchick The Daily Beast Heidi Kitrosser University of Minnesota Law School Jim Kolbe Former member, U.S. House of Representatives David Lampo Author, “A Fundamental Freedom” Log Cabin Republicans Eli Lehrer President, R Street Institute James Lindgren Northwestern University Law School David Link Fred Litwin Fabulous Blue Tent Brett McDonnell University of Minnesota Law School William McGeveran University of Minnesota Law School Ken Mehlman Businessman; 62nd Chairman, Republican National Committee Stephen H. Miller Independent Gay Forum/IGF Culture Watch Charles Murray American Enterprise Institute Norman Ornstein American Enterprise Institute
  • 5. Richard Painter University of Minnesota Law School Branden Petersen Minnesota State Senate Mark Pietrzyk David Post Temple University School of Law Randy R. Potts Box Turtle Bulletin Joe Radinovich Minnesota State House of Representatives Jonathan Rauch The Brookings Institution Stephen Richer The University of Chicago Law School Purple Elephant Republicans Jonathan W. Rowe Mercer County Community College Will Saletan Slate.com Robert Sarvis 2014 U.S. Senate candidate, Virginia Sally Satel American Enterprise Institute Leah Ward Sears Partner at Schiff Hardin LLP Former Georgia Supreme Court Justice. Rick Sincere Chairman, Gays and Lesbians for Individual Liberty Christina Hoff Sommers Resident Scholar American Enterprise Institute Andrew Sullivan Berin Szoka President, TechFreedom Rich Tafel Public Squared Peter Thiel Co-founder, PayPal Rob Tisinai Box Turtle Bulletin Eugene Volokh UCLA School of Law Sasha Volokh Emory Law School Milan Vydareny Cathy Young Contributing Editor, Reason Magazine