SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  16
Welcome to The Forests Dialogue’s

                        Scoping Dialogue on
                      REDD+ Benefit Sharing




23-24 March 2013
Washington, DC, USA
Today’s Program
Saturday, 23 March
9:30-13:00
Morning Chair: Chris Buss
 Welcome and Introduction
 TFD and IUCN Initiatives
 Background on Benefit Sharing
 Stakeholder Presentations

14:00-17:30
Afternoon Chair: Diji Chandrasekharan Behr
 Key Issues Carousel
 Report Back

19:00 – Group Dinner
TFD & the REDD+ Initiative




Gary Dunning
The Forests Dialogue



23 March 2013
Washington, DC, USA
Welcome
Co-Chairs
•   Chris Buss (IUCN)
•   Diji Chandrasekharan Behr
    (World Bank)
•   Ghan Shaym Pandey
    (GACF)
Dialogue Support

Partners


Support



Host
The Forests Dialogue
Purpose
• Established in 2000 by
  NGO and Business Leaders
• Reduce conflict among
  stakeholders in the forest
  sector
• International platform and
  process to discuss key SFM
  and conservation issues
• Build mutual trust,
  enhanced understanding
  and commitment to
  change

Structure
• Steering Committee
• Secretariat
• Network of Partners
How TFD Works TFD
           How
            Works
TFD Initiatives
Priority SFM Issues
• REDD+ Benefit Sharing
• Food, Fuel, Fiber and Forests
• Genetically Modified Trees
• Free, Prior, and Informed
   Consent
• Investing in Locally Controlled
   Forestry
• Forests & Poverty Reduction
   and Rural Livelihoods
• Intensively Managed Planted
   Forests
• Illegal Logging and
   Forest Governance
• Forests and Biodiversity
   Conservation
• Forest Certification
Purpose of TFDs “Scoping”
• Small group of invited participants are asked to share
  their experience and “weigh-in” on TFDs ability to
  positively address challenges
• Intended to be an initial foray into a challenging, forest
  related issue
• Listen, learn and share broad range of knowledge and
  experience
• Not driving toward solutions…yet. Focus on key
  questions and opportunities for progress
TFD’s Process
TFD Operates under the
  Chatham House Rule
“Participants are free to use the
   information received, but neither
   the identity nor the affiliation of
   the speaker(s), nor that of any
   other participant, may be
   revealed".


Ground Rules
• Use mobiles and
  computers during breaks
• No video
• Pictures OK
• Use Name Tents
TFD’s Process
Spirit of Participation
• Active listening
• Constructive, solution
  oriented interventions
• Participate as individual
• Help define and own the
  outcomes
• Facilitation “light”
REDD+ Benefit Sharing
     Initiative
TFDs Forest and Climate Change Related Initiatives




       Forest & Climate Change:     Financing REDD+:       REDD+ Readiness :
              275 Leaders           100 Stakeholders       240 Stakeholders
                                                       Brazil; Ghana; Guatemala; Ecuador; Cambodia




                  2007              2008               2009                2010                      2011
UNFCCC BALI:                      Poznan:        Copenhagen:            Cancun:                 Durban:
         RED                      REDD           REDD+                  Ratification of REDD+   Market and non-
         Co-benefits/safeguard                   Consensus on           Guidance and            market mechanisms
         will “derail” RED                       principles and         safeguards for REDD     may be both
                                                 safeguards             +(in ANNEX 1)           appropriate
                                                 Phased approach
Other                                                                                             REDD+ Partnership:
Multilateral                      FCPF           FIP                     REDD+                    75 countries
Mechanisms
                                  UNREDD                                                          FCPF: 37
                                                                         Partnership              UNREDD: 44
                                                                                                  FIP: 8
Key Findings
Strategic Needs:
• Alignment of REDD+ perspectives
• Alignment with land-use strategies
• Enhanced phased approach

Key Issues:
• Access to, use and availability of
  information and its use in capacity-
  building
• Effectiveness of multi-stakeholder
  participation and engagement
  mechanisms and processes
• Reform of policy and legislative
  frameworks, particularly those on
  tree and carbon rights
• Integration of REDD-plus policies
  with broader land-use plans and
  other sector and development plans
• Establishment of a revenue and
  benefits distribution system
Objectives of this Dialogue
• Develop and understand the current state of REDD+
  Benefit Sharing in several countries to identify the
  challenges of designing and implementing those
  mechanisms more broadly;
• Build a community of practice among locally-rooted,
  well connected REDD practitioners to share
  experiences and to develop practical tools that support
  effective, efficient and equitable benefit sharing for
  REDD+;
• Promote appropriate economic, policy and institutional
  arrangements at local, national and international levels
  to facilitate equitable and efficient delivery of REDD+
  Benefit Sharing mechanisms.
Thank You!
TFD Documents and
Publications
Available electronically in English at:
www.theforestsdialogue.org
 Follow us on Twitter: @forestsdialogue

 Like us on Facebook: the forests dialogue


                   The Forests Dialogue Secretariat
                                     Yale University
                               New Haven, CT, USA

                                    +1 203 432 5966

                                       tfd@yale.edu
                          www.theforestsdialogue.org

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Civic response presentation on civil society and redd+ in ghana
Civic response presentation on civil society and redd+ in ghanaCivic response presentation on civil society and redd+ in ghana
Civic response presentation on civil society and redd+ in ghana
theREDDdesk
 
Un redd presentation
Un redd presentationUn redd presentation
Un redd presentation
theREDDdesk
 

Tendances (20)

Engaging logging concessions in REDD+
Engaging logging concessions in REDD+Engaging logging concessions in REDD+
Engaging logging concessions in REDD+
 
Civic response presentation on civil society and redd+ in ghana
Civic response presentation on civil society and redd+ in ghanaCivic response presentation on civil society and redd+ in ghana
Civic response presentation on civil society and redd+ in ghana
 
Un redd presentation
Un redd presentationUn redd presentation
Un redd presentation
 
Engaging men and women in REDD+ businesses
Engaging men and women in REDD+ businessesEngaging men and women in REDD+ businesses
Engaging men and women in REDD+ businesses
 
Redd+
Redd+Redd+
Redd+
 
REDD+ in Indonesia: A project or a new mode of governance?
REDD+ in Indonesia: A project or a new mode of governance?REDD+ in Indonesia: A project or a new mode of governance?
REDD+ in Indonesia: A project or a new mode of governance?
 
Forests, Climate Change and REDD+: A brief introduction
Forests, Climate Change and REDD+: A brief introductionForests, Climate Change and REDD+: A brief introduction
Forests, Climate Change and REDD+: A brief introduction
 
A global comparative review of REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms
A global comparative review of REDD+ benefit sharing mechanismsA global comparative review of REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms
A global comparative review of REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms
 
REDD+ progress in 13 countries
REDD+ progress in 13 countriesREDD+ progress in 13 countries
REDD+ progress in 13 countries
 
Digging into Land Sector GHG Accounting under the Paris Agreement
Digging into Land Sector GHG Accounting under the Paris AgreementDigging into Land Sector GHG Accounting under the Paris Agreement
Digging into Land Sector GHG Accounting under the Paris Agreement
 
Sayeed Mehmood's Presentation on Forest Certification
Sayeed Mehmood's Presentation on Forest CertificationSayeed Mehmood's Presentation on Forest Certification
Sayeed Mehmood's Presentation on Forest Certification
 
What Works and What Doesn't? Introducing CIFOR's Benefit Sharing Knowledge Tool
What Works and What Doesn't? Introducing CIFOR's Benefit Sharing Knowledge ToolWhat Works and What Doesn't? Introducing CIFOR's Benefit Sharing Knowledge Tool
What Works and What Doesn't? Introducing CIFOR's Benefit Sharing Knowledge Tool
 
REDD+ National strategy and policy options
REDD+ National strategy and policy optionsREDD+ National strategy and policy options
REDD+ National strategy and policy options
 
Growing forest partnerships and the investing in locally controlled initiative
Growing forest partnerships and the investing in locally controlled initiativeGrowing forest partnerships and the investing in locally controlled initiative
Growing forest partnerships and the investing in locally controlled initiative
 
Climate change & REDD
Climate change & REDDClimate change & REDD
Climate change & REDD
 
Options and Way Forward in Designing Benefit Sharing In Indonesia
Options and Way Forward in Designing Benefit Sharing In IndonesiaOptions and Way Forward in Designing Benefit Sharing In Indonesia
Options and Way Forward in Designing Benefit Sharing In Indonesia
 
Moving ahead with REDD+: challenges and opportunities
Moving ahead with REDD+: challenges and opportunitiesMoving ahead with REDD+: challenges and opportunities
Moving ahead with REDD+: challenges and opportunities
 
Global Comparative Study on REDD+:  Some highlights of the PNA study
Global Comparative Study on REDD+:  Some highlights of the PNA studyGlobal Comparative Study on REDD+:  Some highlights of the PNA study
Global Comparative Study on REDD+:  Some highlights of the PNA study
 
Webinar: Resources for Countries to Enhance NDCs by 2020
Webinar: Resources for Countries to Enhance NDCs by 2020Webinar: Resources for Countries to Enhance NDCs by 2020
Webinar: Resources for Countries to Enhance NDCs by 2020
 
Global Comparative Study on REDD+: Knowledge for action to protect tropical f...
Global Comparative Study on REDD+: Knowledge for action to protect tropical f...Global Comparative Study on REDD+: Knowledge for action to protect tropical f...
Global Comparative Study on REDD+: Knowledge for action to protect tropical f...
 

Similaire à Day 1_TFD. gary dunning

Pham UN-REDD safeguards_翻訳付
Pham UN-REDD safeguards_翻訳付Pham UN-REDD safeguards_翻訳付
Pham UN-REDD safeguards_翻訳付
Pham Nam
 
Laos redd intro
Laos redd introLaos redd intro
Laos redd intro
LIWG-Laos
 
Practical Use of Governance Assessment Information for REDD+ in Ecuador
Practical Use of Governance Assessment Information for REDD+ in EcuadorPractical Use of Governance Assessment Information for REDD+ in Ecuador
Practical Use of Governance Assessment Information for REDD+ in Ecuador
World Resources Institute (WRI)
 

Similaire à Day 1_TFD. gary dunning (20)

REDD+ Challenges and Opportunities: experiences from social and environmental...
REDD+ Challenges and Opportunities: experiences from social and environmental...REDD+ Challenges and Opportunities: experiences from social and environmental...
REDD+ Challenges and Opportunities: experiences from social and environmental...
 
Opportunities and challenges to developing REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms i...
Opportunities and challenges to developing REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms i...Opportunities and challenges to developing REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms i...
Opportunities and challenges to developing REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms i...
 
Transforming REDD+ lessons learned and way forward
Transforming REDD+ lessons learned and way forwardTransforming REDD+ lessons learned and way forward
Transforming REDD+ lessons learned and way forward
 
Moving from readiness to performance-based payments
Moving from readiness to performance-based paymentsMoving from readiness to performance-based payments
Moving from readiness to performance-based payments
 
Pham UN-REDD safeguards_翻訳付
Pham UN-REDD safeguards_翻訳付Pham UN-REDD safeguards_翻訳付
Pham UN-REDD safeguards_翻訳付
 
Franks220110
Franks220110Franks220110
Franks220110
 
Gender and REDD+: an overview
Gender and REDD+: an overviewGender and REDD+: an overview
Gender and REDD+: an overview
 
CIFOR and Global Comparative study on REDD+
CIFOR and Global Comparative study on REDD+ CIFOR and Global Comparative study on REDD+
CIFOR and Global Comparative study on REDD+
 
Transforming REDD+ Lessons and new direction
Transforming REDD+ Lessons and new directionTransforming REDD+ Lessons and new direction
Transforming REDD+ Lessons and new direction
 
Laos redd intro
Laos redd introLaos redd intro
Laos redd intro
 
Global Comparative Study on REDD+ - The Project and Results
Global Comparative Study on REDD+ - The Project and ResultsGlobal Comparative Study on REDD+ - The Project and Results
Global Comparative Study on REDD+ - The Project and Results
 
Consultation on the UN-REDD Programme Guidelines on Free, Prior and Informed ...
Consultation on the UN-REDD Programme Guidelines on Free, Prior and Informed ...Consultation on the UN-REDD Programme Guidelines on Free, Prior and Informed ...
Consultation on the UN-REDD Programme Guidelines on Free, Prior and Informed ...
 
REDD+ Dynamics: [not] A one size fit all solution
REDD+ Dynamics: [not] A one size fit all solutionREDD+ Dynamics: [not] A one size fit all solution
REDD+ Dynamics: [not] A one size fit all solution
 
REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration
REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsiderationREDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration
REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration
 
Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Morning Sessions
Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Morning SessionsForest Day 5 Voting Results – Morning Sessions
Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Morning Sessions
 
UNFF 10: Knowfor
UNFF 10: Knowfor UNFF 10: Knowfor
UNFF 10: Knowfor
 
Networks, actors and power: A case study of REDD+ in Brazil
Networks, actors and power: A case study of REDD+ in Brazil Networks, actors and power: A case study of REDD+ in Brazil
Networks, actors and power: A case study of REDD+ in Brazil
 
Practical Use of Governance Assessment Information for REDD+ in Ecuador
Practical Use of Governance Assessment Information for REDD+ in EcuadorPractical Use of Governance Assessment Information for REDD+ in Ecuador
Practical Use of Governance Assessment Information for REDD+ in Ecuador
 
Equity workshop: Safeguards and standards for equity in redd+
Equity workshop: Safeguards and standards for equity in redd+Equity workshop: Safeguards and standards for equity in redd+
Equity workshop: Safeguards and standards for equity in redd+
 
REDD+ as a means to achieve Madre de Dios’ green development
REDD+ as a means to achieve Madre de Dios’ green development REDD+ as a means to achieve Madre de Dios’ green development
REDD+ as a means to achieve Madre de Dios’ green development
 

Plus de The Forests Dialogue

Day 2. Presentation. diji chandrasekharan
Day 2. Presentation. diji chandrasekharanDay 2. Presentation. diji chandrasekharan
Day 2. Presentation. diji chandrasekharan
The Forests Dialogue
 
Day 1. Presentation 4. patrick kipalu
Day 1. Presentation 4. patrick kipaluDay 1. Presentation 4. patrick kipalu
Day 1. Presentation 4. patrick kipalu
The Forests Dialogue
 
Day 1.Presentation 3. augustin silvani
Day 1.Presentation 3. augustin silvaniDay 1.Presentation 3. augustin silvani
Day 1.Presentation 3. augustin silvani
The Forests Dialogue
 
Day 1. Presentation 2. iwan wibisono
Day 1. Presentation 2. iwan wibisonoDay 1. Presentation 2. iwan wibisono
Day 1. Presentation 2. iwan wibisono
The Forests Dialogue
 
Day 2 paulo kagyama aula 8 biodiv ferram
Day 2 paulo kagyama   aula 8 biodiv ferramDay 2 paulo kagyama   aula 8 biodiv ferram
Day 2 paulo kagyama aula 8 biodiv ferram
The Forests Dialogue
 

Plus de The Forests Dialogue (20)

Design of national programs to accommodate different local contexts - Experi...
Design of national programs to accommodate different local contexts -  Experi...Design of national programs to accommodate different local contexts -  Experi...
Design of national programs to accommodate different local contexts - Experi...
 
Alto Mayo Case Study: Conservation International Peru
Alto Mayo Case Study: Conservation International PeruAlto Mayo Case Study: Conservation International Peru
Alto Mayo Case Study: Conservation International Peru
 
Linking Policy and Practice: Approaches to REDD+ Benefit Sharing
Linking Policy and Practice: Approaches to REDD+ Benefit SharingLinking Policy and Practice: Approaches to REDD+ Benefit Sharing
Linking Policy and Practice: Approaches to REDD+ Benefit Sharing
 
Doing Dialogue: Using multi-stakeholder processes as a tool to reduce conflic...
Doing Dialogue: Using multi-stakeholder processes as a tool to reduce conflic...Doing Dialogue: Using multi-stakeholder processes as a tool to reduce conflic...
Doing Dialogue: Using multi-stakeholder processes as a tool to reduce conflic...
 
Realizing the Potential of Investing in Locally Controlled Forestry
Realizing the Potential of Investing in Locally Controlled Forestry Realizing the Potential of Investing in Locally Controlled Forestry
Realizing the Potential of Investing in Locally Controlled Forestry
 
UNFF10 PRESENTATION on Investing in locally controlled forestry
UNFF10  PRESENTATION on Investing in locally controlled forestryUNFF10  PRESENTATION on Investing in locally controlled forestry
UNFF10 PRESENTATION on Investing in locally controlled forestry
 
Day2. Group discussion
Day2. Group discussionDay2. Group discussion
Day2. Group discussion
 
Day 2. Presentation. diji chandrasekharan
Day 2. Presentation. diji chandrasekharanDay 2. Presentation. diji chandrasekharan
Day 2. Presentation. diji chandrasekharan
 
Day 2. Co chairs reflections
Day 2. Co chairs reflectionsDay 2. Co chairs reflections
Day 2. Co chairs reflections
 
Group discussion
Group discussionGroup discussion
Group discussion
 
Day 1. Presentation 4. patrick kipalu
Day 1. Presentation 4. patrick kipaluDay 1. Presentation 4. patrick kipalu
Day 1. Presentation 4. patrick kipalu
 
Day 1.Presentation 3. augustin silvani
Day 1.Presentation 3. augustin silvaniDay 1.Presentation 3. augustin silvani
Day 1.Presentation 3. augustin silvani
 
Day 1. Presentation 2. iwan wibisono
Day 1. Presentation 2. iwan wibisonoDay 1. Presentation 2. iwan wibisono
Day 1. Presentation 2. iwan wibisono
 
Day 1.Presentation 1. grace wong
Day 1.Presentation 1. grace wongDay 1.Presentation 1. grace wong
Day 1.Presentation 1. grace wong
 
Day 1_3. xiaoting hou
Day 1_3. xiaoting houDay 1_3. xiaoting hou
Day 1_3. xiaoting hou
 
Doing Dialogue: Using MSD processes as a tool to reduce conflict in the for...
Doing Dialogue: Using MSD processes as a tool to reduce conflict in the for...Doing Dialogue: Using MSD processes as a tool to reduce conflict in the for...
Doing Dialogue: Using MSD processes as a tool to reduce conflict in the for...
 
TFD UNFF AHEG2 ILCF Presentation
TFD UNFF AHEG2 ILCF PresentationTFD UNFF AHEG2 ILCF Presentation
TFD UNFF AHEG2 ILCF Presentation
 
Investment In Locally Controlled Forestry: Implementation of the Guide
Investment In Locally Controlled Forestry: Implementation of the GuideInvestment In Locally Controlled Forestry: Implementation of the Guide
Investment In Locally Controlled Forestry: Implementation of the Guide
 
Day 2 paulo kagyama aula 8 biodiv ferram
Day 2 paulo kagyama   aula 8 biodiv ferramDay 2 paulo kagyama   aula 8 biodiv ferram
Day 2 paulo kagyama aula 8 biodiv ferram
 
Dialogo florestal arnaldo.sae
Dialogo florestal   arnaldo.saeDialogo florestal   arnaldo.sae
Dialogo florestal arnaldo.sae
 

Day 1_TFD. gary dunning

  • 1. Welcome to The Forests Dialogue’s Scoping Dialogue on REDD+ Benefit Sharing 23-24 March 2013 Washington, DC, USA
  • 2. Today’s Program Saturday, 23 March 9:30-13:00 Morning Chair: Chris Buss  Welcome and Introduction  TFD and IUCN Initiatives  Background on Benefit Sharing  Stakeholder Presentations 14:00-17:30 Afternoon Chair: Diji Chandrasekharan Behr  Key Issues Carousel  Report Back 19:00 – Group Dinner
  • 3. TFD & the REDD+ Initiative Gary Dunning The Forests Dialogue 23 March 2013 Washington, DC, USA
  • 4. Welcome Co-Chairs • Chris Buss (IUCN) • Diji Chandrasekharan Behr (World Bank) • Ghan Shaym Pandey (GACF)
  • 6. The Forests Dialogue Purpose • Established in 2000 by NGO and Business Leaders • Reduce conflict among stakeholders in the forest sector • International platform and process to discuss key SFM and conservation issues • Build mutual trust, enhanced understanding and commitment to change Structure • Steering Committee • Secretariat • Network of Partners
  • 7. How TFD Works TFD How Works
  • 8. TFD Initiatives Priority SFM Issues • REDD+ Benefit Sharing • Food, Fuel, Fiber and Forests • Genetically Modified Trees • Free, Prior, and Informed Consent • Investing in Locally Controlled Forestry • Forests & Poverty Reduction and Rural Livelihoods • Intensively Managed Planted Forests • Illegal Logging and Forest Governance • Forests and Biodiversity Conservation • Forest Certification
  • 9. Purpose of TFDs “Scoping” • Small group of invited participants are asked to share their experience and “weigh-in” on TFDs ability to positively address challenges • Intended to be an initial foray into a challenging, forest related issue • Listen, learn and share broad range of knowledge and experience • Not driving toward solutions…yet. Focus on key questions and opportunities for progress
  • 10. TFD’s Process TFD Operates under the Chatham House Rule “Participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed". Ground Rules • Use mobiles and computers during breaks • No video • Pictures OK • Use Name Tents
  • 11. TFD’s Process Spirit of Participation • Active listening • Constructive, solution oriented interventions • Participate as individual • Help define and own the outcomes • Facilitation “light”
  • 12. REDD+ Benefit Sharing Initiative
  • 13. TFDs Forest and Climate Change Related Initiatives Forest & Climate Change: Financing REDD+: REDD+ Readiness : 275 Leaders 100 Stakeholders 240 Stakeholders Brazil; Ghana; Guatemala; Ecuador; Cambodia 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 UNFCCC BALI: Poznan: Copenhagen: Cancun: Durban: RED REDD REDD+ Ratification of REDD+ Market and non- Co-benefits/safeguard Consensus on Guidance and market mechanisms will “derail” RED principles and safeguards for REDD may be both safeguards +(in ANNEX 1) appropriate Phased approach Other REDD+ Partnership: Multilateral FCPF FIP REDD+ 75 countries Mechanisms UNREDD FCPF: 37 Partnership UNREDD: 44 FIP: 8
  • 14. Key Findings Strategic Needs: • Alignment of REDD+ perspectives • Alignment with land-use strategies • Enhanced phased approach Key Issues: • Access to, use and availability of information and its use in capacity- building • Effectiveness of multi-stakeholder participation and engagement mechanisms and processes • Reform of policy and legislative frameworks, particularly those on tree and carbon rights • Integration of REDD-plus policies with broader land-use plans and other sector and development plans • Establishment of a revenue and benefits distribution system
  • 15. Objectives of this Dialogue • Develop and understand the current state of REDD+ Benefit Sharing in several countries to identify the challenges of designing and implementing those mechanisms more broadly; • Build a community of practice among locally-rooted, well connected REDD practitioners to share experiences and to develop practical tools that support effective, efficient and equitable benefit sharing for REDD+; • Promote appropriate economic, policy and institutional arrangements at local, national and international levels to facilitate equitable and efficient delivery of REDD+ Benefit Sharing mechanisms.
  • 16. Thank You! TFD Documents and Publications Available electronically in English at: www.theforestsdialogue.org Follow us on Twitter: @forestsdialogue Like us on Facebook: the forests dialogue The Forests Dialogue Secretariat Yale University New Haven, CT, USA +1 203 432 5966 tfd@yale.edu www.theforestsdialogue.org

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. What is “REDD”? (2005) Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries; What is “plus”? (Bali Action Plan 2007…) and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks The final decision compromises on the divisive issue of market versus non-market based approaches, recognizing both approaches may be appropriate, dependent on the country’s circumstances. Market based approaches would likely mean the sale of rights to carbon stored in or sequestered by the forest, whereas non-market based approaches are more ambiguous. At the moment, non-market refers to grant-based finance for REDD+ readiness. However, it could come to include mechanisms that focus on the implementation phase, as well.The Forest Investment Program (FIP) is a targeted program of the Strategic Climate Fund (SCF), which is one of two funds within the framework of the Climate Investment Funds (CIF).  The FIP supports developing country efforts to reduce deforestation and forest degradation and promote sustainable forest management that leads to emissions reductions and enhancement of forest carbon stocks (REDD+).FACTUS$ 639 million...the amount of money that is pledged to the FIP. - Photo: Kimie Velhagen/CIF Admin UnitChanneled through the MDBs as grants and near-zero interest credits, FIP financing complements large-scale investments and leverages additional resources, including from the private sector, to:Promote forest mitigation efforts, including protection of forest ecosystem servicesProvide support outside the forest sector to reduce pressure on forestsHelp countries strengthen institutional capacity, forest governance, and forest-related knowledgeMainstream climate resilience considerations and contribute to biodiversity conservation, protection of the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities, and poverty reduction through rural livelihoods enhancements