SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  17
Oncology Drug Approval
Process in Canada
Ryan Clarke
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Overview
• Process
• Drug approvals
• Pricing
• pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review
• Listings (ON)
Process
• Public drug formularies are impacted by federal,
provincial and national policies
• Manufacturer submits to Health Canada for
approval
• Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB)
regulates prices
• pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR)
reviews new oncology drugs and makes
reimbursement recommendations
• Provinces also review new oncology drugs and
make reimbursement decisions
Final decision made by Executive Officer
Drug Approval Process in ON
Health Canada
Issues NOC & DIN
Interim decision made by Executive Officer
Non-CDR products /
non-pCODR products
Manufacturer submits
NOC= Notice of Compliance – indicating drug
is safe and effective
DIN= Drug Identification Number
CDR =Common Drug Review
CDEC = Canadian Drug Expert Committee
pCODR = pan-Canadian Oncology Drug
Review
pERC = pCODR Expert Review Committee
NCE = New Chemical Entity
Ontario’s CED reviews Health Canada status, CDR recommendation, pCODR
recommendation and conducts Ontario-specific review.
CED provides recommendation to Executive Officer to reimburse (or not) through
publicly funded program
Common Drug Review products
(NCE / new combination product /
new indication)
CDEC recommendation to drug plans
Manufacturer submits
pCODR Products
(NCE / new combination product /
new indication)
pERC recommendation to
drug plans
specific to oncology drugs
Up to 2 years
Non-transparent
Up to 1 year
Transparent
Negotiations
Up to 2 mths
Transparent
~ 1 month
Open ended
Drug Approvals
• Submissions for approval are to the
Therapeutic Products Directorate of Health
Canada
• Reviewed and assessed for safety, efficacy
and quality
• Issued a Notice of Compliance (NOC) or Notice
of Compliance with Conditions (NOCc)
• Average approval time from New Drug
Submission to NOC – 18 months
Pricing
• In Canada, we have regulated prices for patented
or brand name drugs by the Patented Medicine
Prices Review Board
• Mission – contribute to Canadian health care by
ensuring that prices of patented medicines are not
excessive
• Also report on price trends of all medicines and
R&D conducted by patentees
• Annual Report 2011 – Canadian prices were the
fourth highest among the seven comparator
countries, lower than prices in Switzerland,
Germany and the US.
pan-Canadian Oncology
Drug Review
• The pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review
(pCODR) assesses cancer drugs and makes
recommendations to the provinces and
territories to guide their drug funding decisions
• Established in 2010 by the provincial and
territorial Ministries of Health, pCODR is
designed to bring consistency and clarity to the
assessment of new cancer drugs by looking at
both clinical evidence and cost-effectiveness
pCODR Organizational Structure
Confidential – Do Not Distribute
pCODRReview Process
Updated March 31, 2011
1. Conduct
Pre-
Submission
Planning
activities
including
getting
input from
PAG and
notifying
Patient
Advocacy
Groups
2. Prepare
& submit
Request
for Drug
Review
4.2.
Conduct
Economic
Review
5.
Summarize
& Review
with pERC
6. Prepare &
Publicly
Post Initial
Recomm,
Post
Reviews
8. Summarize
& Review with
pERC
3.1 Screen
Submission
and Initiate
Review
Process
End‡
Industry/TumourGrouppCODR*
Variable 5 business days 70-90 business days 12 business days 10 business days 20 business days
7.1 Get
Feedback
from
Submitter
(and impacted
manufacturer)
7.3 Get
Feedback
from Patient
Advocacy
Group
7.2 Get
Feedback
from PAG
PatientAdvocacy
Groups
9. Prepare &
Publicly Post
Final
Recomm &
Post Input
12 business days
*Includes pCODR Secretariat, Clinical
Guidance Panel, Economic Guidance Panel,
pCODR Expert Review Committee (pERC)
and Provincial Advisory Group (PAG)
4.1.1/4.2.2
Clarify info
with
Submitter
during
review
4.1.
Conduct
Clinical
Review
3.2 Collect
Patient
Advocacy
Group
Input
Estimated
99 – 149
business days
7.4
Eligible for
Early
Conversion?
No Yes
‡Next steps could include
Recommendation implementation,
Procedural Review or Resubmission
9
pCODR Patient Evidence
Submissions
• As of April, 2011 there is a Submit & Contribute
section at www.pcodr.ca
• It allows registered patient advocacy groups
to submit and contribute drug review
information and input into the review process
and initial recommendation
• Groups must be registered with pCODR, but
first you must be eligible to register
• The registration process can take up to five
business days and is done by way of an Online
Registration Request
pCODR Patient Evidence
Submissions
• Within two business days of submitting their
request, patient advocacy groups will receive an e-
mail from pCODR with instructions on the final
steps to complete their registration
• As part of completing their registration, patient
advocacy groups will create a username and
password allowing them to login to pCODR’s
‘secure Submit & Contribute page’
• Submissions are available at www.pcodr.ca by
tracking a review
• There are conditions for registration i.e. the
mandate of the group must exist prior to registration
pCODR Patient Evidence
Submissions
• Areas for input include:
– Information about the group including
declaration of COI
– How was information gathered for submission
– Experiences of patients with type of cancer
(symptoms, limitations, quality of life, financial)
with current treatment, impact on caregivers
– Patient experiences with the new drug (medical,
psychosocial) including risks and benefits,
examples of better symptom management, ease
of use
Listings
• Provinces and territories have (and will
continue to have) the final word on whether a
medication is publicly funded
• Federal government does the same with their
six public formularies (i.e. Non-Insured Health
Benefit Program for Canadian First Nations
and Inuit people, veterans, Canadian Forces
members, designated migrants, RCMP and
Correctional Service Canada)
• 19 different public formularies, each with their
own review and decision-making processes
Oncology Listings - Ontario
• Manufacturer or Disease Site Groups can make a
submission to the province
• From there it will be initially reviewed by the Steering
Committee for Cancer Drug Programs (just being
established now)
• The Steering Committee will then make a recommendation
to the Committee to Evaluate Drugs (CED)
• CED - 10 physician/pharmacist members, plus 2 patient
representatives, appointed by the government
• CED mandated to make recommendations to the Executive
Officer (EO) on which drugs should be reimbursed through
the various Ontario Public Drug Programs
• EO makes the final decision
Patient Evidence Submissions -
Ontario
• New patient input process in place as of April
1, 2010
• Patient evidence submissions will be accepted
from registered advocacy groups directly to the
CED
• There had never before been a process to
allow this kind of direct engagement between
the members of the CED and the public
• Having said that, the process and guidelines
around submissions are very narrow
Patient Evidence Submissions -
Ontario
• Impact of the disease/condition
• Treatment outcomes that matter most to patients
• Information from patients who have used this drug
• Does not ask how information was gathered to
address these issues (still allows for surveys and
patient interviews)
• Information provided is collated by the ministry and
reviewed and presented by a patient member of the
CED, during the CED discussions of societal values
and patient perspective of the drug product
Advocacy Solutions®
Contact Information:
Ryan Clarke, LL.B.
t. 905.891.0311
f. 905.891.0366
ryan@advocacysolutions.ca
www.advocacysolutions.ca

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Trudel Cms Rules 072810[1]
Trudel Cms Rules 072810[1]Trudel Cms Rules 072810[1]
Trudel Cms Rules 072810[1]
nealkanage
 

Tendances (17)

RDD 2020 Day 2 AM : Tania Stafinski
RDD 2020 Day 2 AM : Tania StafinskiRDD 2020 Day 2 AM : Tania Stafinski
RDD 2020 Day 2 AM : Tania Stafinski
 
Pharma funding of patient groups: the building blocks of ethical and appropri...
Pharma funding of patient groups: the building blocks of ethical and appropri...Pharma funding of patient groups: the building blocks of ethical and appropri...
Pharma funding of patient groups: the building blocks of ethical and appropri...
 
TGA presentation: Codeine Industry Forum - Regulatory options for up-scheduling
TGA presentation: Codeine Industry Forum - Regulatory options for up-schedulingTGA presentation: Codeine Industry Forum - Regulatory options for up-scheduling
TGA presentation: Codeine Industry Forum - Regulatory options for up-scheduling
 
TGA Presentation: Using the online Clinical Trial Notification (CTN) form
TGA Presentation: Using the online Clinical Trial Notification (CTN) formTGA Presentation: Using the online Clinical Trial Notification (CTN) form
TGA Presentation: Using the online Clinical Trial Notification (CTN) form
 
CADTH - Why it is important, and what now?
CADTH - Why it is important, and what now?CADTH - Why it is important, and what now?
CADTH - Why it is important, and what now?
 
Gmp slide deck for slide share v3 for explainer video
Gmp slide deck for slide share v3 for explainer videoGmp slide deck for slide share v3 for explainer video
Gmp slide deck for slide share v3 for explainer video
 
Regulatory Highlights and Drug Development in China
Regulatory Highlights and Drug Development in ChinaRegulatory Highlights and Drug Development in China
Regulatory Highlights and Drug Development in China
 
Overview of the Complementary Medicines regulatory framework
Overview of the Complementary Medicines regulatory frameworkOverview of the Complementary Medicines regulatory framework
Overview of the Complementary Medicines regulatory framework
 
Presentation: Medicinal Cannabis - what's happening?
Presentation: Medicinal Cannabis - what's happening?Presentation: Medicinal Cannabis - what's happening?
Presentation: Medicinal Cannabis - what's happening?
 
Presentation Trends in Australian and international regulation and regulatory...
Presentation Trends in Australian and international regulation and regulatory...Presentation Trends in Australian and international regulation and regulatory...
Presentation Trends in Australian and international regulation and regulatory...
 
RDD 2020 Day 2 AM: Neil Palmer
RDD 2020 Day 2 AM: Neil PalmerRDD 2020 Day 2 AM: Neil Palmer
RDD 2020 Day 2 AM: Neil Palmer
 
Special Access and Advanced Access Programmes: Marion Law (Health Canada)
Special Access and Advanced Access Programmes: Marion Law (Health Canada)Special Access and Advanced Access Programmes: Marion Law (Health Canada)
Special Access and Advanced Access Programmes: Marion Law (Health Canada)
 
Presentation: A journey to better medicine labels - an update on TGO 92
Presentation: A journey to better medicine labels - an update on TGO 92Presentation: A journey to better medicine labels - an update on TGO 92
Presentation: A journey to better medicine labels - an update on TGO 92
 
Update and Variations to Biologicals
Update and Variations to BiologicalsUpdate and Variations to Biologicals
Update and Variations to Biologicals
 
Prescription Medicines MMDR Reforms
Prescription Medicines MMDR ReformsPrescription Medicines MMDR Reforms
Prescription Medicines MMDR Reforms
 
Trudel Cms Rules 072810[1]
Trudel Cms Rules 072810[1]Trudel Cms Rules 072810[1]
Trudel Cms Rules 072810[1]
 
HIT Standards Committee Trudel CMS Rules
HIT Standards Committee Trudel CMS RulesHIT Standards Committee Trudel CMS Rules
HIT Standards Committee Trudel CMS Rules
 

En vedette

Drug designing and discovery
Drug designing and discoveryDrug designing and discovery
Drug designing and discovery
ashishkthakur94
 
Cancer drug targets 2013
Cancer drug targets 2013Cancer drug targets 2013
Cancer drug targets 2013
Elsa von Licy
 
Re-Engineering Early Phase Cancer Drug Development: Decreasing the Time from ...
Re-Engineering Early Phase Cancer Drug Development: Decreasing the Time from ...Re-Engineering Early Phase Cancer Drug Development: Decreasing the Time from ...
Re-Engineering Early Phase Cancer Drug Development: Decreasing the Time from ...
mconghuyen
 

En vedette (10)

¿Qué es la Simulación?
¿Qué es la Simulación?¿Qué es la Simulación?
¿Qué es la Simulación?
 
Drug designing and discovery
Drug designing and discoveryDrug designing and discovery
Drug designing and discovery
 
Cancer drug targets 2013
Cancer drug targets 2013Cancer drug targets 2013
Cancer drug targets 2013
 
Re-Engineering Early Phase Cancer Drug Development: Decreasing the Time from ...
Re-Engineering Early Phase Cancer Drug Development: Decreasing the Time from ...Re-Engineering Early Phase Cancer Drug Development: Decreasing the Time from ...
Re-Engineering Early Phase Cancer Drug Development: Decreasing the Time from ...
 
Drug Approval Bodies in Canada 101: The Elevator Length Pitch
Drug Approval Bodies in Canada 101: The Elevator Length PitchDrug Approval Bodies in Canada 101: The Elevator Length Pitch
Drug Approval Bodies in Canada 101: The Elevator Length Pitch
 
Drug development process and regulatory submissions
Drug development process and regulatory submissionsDrug development process and regulatory submissions
Drug development process and regulatory submissions
 
Drug Development Life Cycle - Costs and Revenue
Drug Development Life Cycle - Costs and RevenueDrug Development Life Cycle - Costs and Revenue
Drug Development Life Cycle - Costs and Revenue
 
New drug approval process
New drug approval processNew drug approval process
New drug approval process
 
Drug Development Life Cycle
Drug Development Life CycleDrug Development Life Cycle
Drug Development Life Cycle
 
Drug discovery and development
Drug discovery and developmentDrug discovery and development
Drug discovery and development
 

Similaire à CCSN Advocacy Webinar #2

Dr_Prabhat_Roy_Kumar_CT_regulatory_challnages_in_India__19Nov14__revised.ppt
Dr_Prabhat_Roy_Kumar_CT_regulatory_challnages_in_India__19Nov14__revised.pptDr_Prabhat_Roy_Kumar_CT_regulatory_challnages_in_India__19Nov14__revised.ppt
Dr_Prabhat_Roy_Kumar_CT_regulatory_challnages_in_India__19Nov14__revised.ppt
RRahulMehrotrra1
 
Marketing Authorization procedures in developed and developing countries
Marketing Authorization procedures in developed and developing countriesMarketing Authorization procedures in developed and developing countries
Marketing Authorization procedures in developed and developing countries
Akshay Saxena
 

Similaire à CCSN Advocacy Webinar #2 (20)

Drug Approval & Reimbursement Processes
Drug Approval & Reimbursement ProcessesDrug Approval & Reimbursement Processes
Drug Approval & Reimbursement Processes
 
How Canada's health technology assessment system can change to better meet pa...
How Canada's health technology assessment system can change to better meet pa...How Canada's health technology assessment system can change to better meet pa...
How Canada's health technology assessment system can change to better meet pa...
 
How patient groups can have more say in the drug approval process
How patient groups can have more say in the drug approval processHow patient groups can have more say in the drug approval process
How patient groups can have more say in the drug approval process
 
When pCODR Says "No", Then What?
When pCODR Says "No", Then What?When pCODR Says "No", Then What?
When pCODR Says "No", Then What?
 
Health Technology Assessment: Comparison between UK and Canada Processes by D...
Health Technology Assessment: Comparison between UK and Canada Processes by D...Health Technology Assessment: Comparison between UK and Canada Processes by D...
Health Technology Assessment: Comparison between UK and Canada Processes by D...
 
Dr_Prabhat_Roy_Kumar_CT_regulatory_challnages_in_India__19Nov14__revised.ppt
Dr_Prabhat_Roy_Kumar_CT_regulatory_challnages_in_India__19Nov14__revised.pptDr_Prabhat_Roy_Kumar_CT_regulatory_challnages_in_India__19Nov14__revised.ppt
Dr_Prabhat_Roy_Kumar_CT_regulatory_challnages_in_India__19Nov14__revised.ppt
 
Comparative study of drug approval system in usa, europe & japan
Comparative study of drug approval system in usa, europe & japanComparative study of drug approval system in usa, europe & japan
Comparative study of drug approval system in usa, europe & japan
 
Maureen smith patient submissionspresentation.m smith.nov2015
Maureen smith patient submissionspresentation.m smith.nov2015Maureen smith patient submissionspresentation.m smith.nov2015
Maureen smith patient submissionspresentation.m smith.nov2015
 
Cdsco- a regulatory overview
Cdsco- a regulatory overviewCdsco- a regulatory overview
Cdsco- a regulatory overview
 
The importance of clinician engagement in the HTA process
The importance of clinician engagement in the HTA processThe importance of clinician engagement in the HTA process
The importance of clinician engagement in the HTA process
 
How Timely is Canada’s Medication Review and Approval Process?
How Timely is Canada’s Medication Review and Approval Process?How Timely is Canada’s Medication Review and Approval Process?
How Timely is Canada’s Medication Review and Approval Process?
 
4.2 TT-Approved regulatory bodies and agencies.pdf
4.2 TT-Approved regulatory bodies and agencies.pdf4.2 TT-Approved regulatory bodies and agencies.pdf
4.2 TT-Approved regulatory bodies and agencies.pdf
 
Cathy parker the orphan drug framework
Cathy parker the orphan drug frameworkCathy parker the orphan drug framework
Cathy parker the orphan drug framework
 
Application for New Drug Discovery (NDD) according to USFDA guidelines
Application for New Drug Discovery (NDD) according to USFDA guidelines Application for New Drug Discovery (NDD) according to USFDA guidelines
Application for New Drug Discovery (NDD) according to USFDA guidelines
 
Regulatory agencies
Regulatory agenciesRegulatory agencies
Regulatory agencies
 
Marketing Authorization procedures in developed and developing countries
Marketing Authorization procedures in developed and developing countriesMarketing Authorization procedures in developed and developing countries
Marketing Authorization procedures in developed and developing countries
 
Patient Input: What is asked for and what is helpful in a patient submission
Patient Input: What is asked for and what is helpful in a patient submissionPatient Input: What is asked for and what is helpful in a patient submission
Patient Input: What is asked for and what is helpful in a patient submission
 
RDD 2020 Day 1 PM: Health Canada Regulatory Update
RDD 2020 Day 1 PM: Health Canada Regulatory UpdateRDD 2020 Day 1 PM: Health Canada Regulatory Update
RDD 2020 Day 1 PM: Health Canada Regulatory Update
 
Rx15 pdmp wed_430_1_stanton_2blake_3ramsey
Rx15 pdmp wed_430_1_stanton_2blake_3ramseyRx15 pdmp wed_430_1_stanton_2blake_3ramsey
Rx15 pdmp wed_430_1_stanton_2blake_3ramsey
 
Medicines and Medical Devices Regulation – current developments and future op...
Medicines and Medical Devices Regulation – current developments and future op...Medicines and Medical Devices Regulation – current developments and future op...
Medicines and Medical Devices Regulation – current developments and future op...
 

CCSN Advocacy Webinar #2

  • 1. Oncology Drug Approval Process in Canada Ryan Clarke Wednesday, April 17, 2013
  • 2. Overview • Process • Drug approvals • Pricing • pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review • Listings (ON)
  • 3. Process • Public drug formularies are impacted by federal, provincial and national policies • Manufacturer submits to Health Canada for approval • Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) regulates prices • pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR) reviews new oncology drugs and makes reimbursement recommendations • Provinces also review new oncology drugs and make reimbursement decisions
  • 4. Final decision made by Executive Officer Drug Approval Process in ON Health Canada Issues NOC & DIN Interim decision made by Executive Officer Non-CDR products / non-pCODR products Manufacturer submits NOC= Notice of Compliance – indicating drug is safe and effective DIN= Drug Identification Number CDR =Common Drug Review CDEC = Canadian Drug Expert Committee pCODR = pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review pERC = pCODR Expert Review Committee NCE = New Chemical Entity Ontario’s CED reviews Health Canada status, CDR recommendation, pCODR recommendation and conducts Ontario-specific review. CED provides recommendation to Executive Officer to reimburse (or not) through publicly funded program Common Drug Review products (NCE / new combination product / new indication) CDEC recommendation to drug plans Manufacturer submits pCODR Products (NCE / new combination product / new indication) pERC recommendation to drug plans specific to oncology drugs Up to 2 years Non-transparent Up to 1 year Transparent Negotiations Up to 2 mths Transparent ~ 1 month Open ended
  • 5. Drug Approvals • Submissions for approval are to the Therapeutic Products Directorate of Health Canada • Reviewed and assessed for safety, efficacy and quality • Issued a Notice of Compliance (NOC) or Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOCc) • Average approval time from New Drug Submission to NOC – 18 months
  • 6. Pricing • In Canada, we have regulated prices for patented or brand name drugs by the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board • Mission – contribute to Canadian health care by ensuring that prices of patented medicines are not excessive • Also report on price trends of all medicines and R&D conducted by patentees • Annual Report 2011 – Canadian prices were the fourth highest among the seven comparator countries, lower than prices in Switzerland, Germany and the US.
  • 7. pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review • The pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR) assesses cancer drugs and makes recommendations to the provinces and territories to guide their drug funding decisions • Established in 2010 by the provincial and territorial Ministries of Health, pCODR is designed to bring consistency and clarity to the assessment of new cancer drugs by looking at both clinical evidence and cost-effectiveness
  • 9. Confidential – Do Not Distribute pCODRReview Process Updated March 31, 2011 1. Conduct Pre- Submission Planning activities including getting input from PAG and notifying Patient Advocacy Groups 2. Prepare & submit Request for Drug Review 4.2. Conduct Economic Review 5. Summarize & Review with pERC 6. Prepare & Publicly Post Initial Recomm, Post Reviews 8. Summarize & Review with pERC 3.1 Screen Submission and Initiate Review Process End‡ Industry/TumourGrouppCODR* Variable 5 business days 70-90 business days 12 business days 10 business days 20 business days 7.1 Get Feedback from Submitter (and impacted manufacturer) 7.3 Get Feedback from Patient Advocacy Group 7.2 Get Feedback from PAG PatientAdvocacy Groups 9. Prepare & Publicly Post Final Recomm & Post Input 12 business days *Includes pCODR Secretariat, Clinical Guidance Panel, Economic Guidance Panel, pCODR Expert Review Committee (pERC) and Provincial Advisory Group (PAG) 4.1.1/4.2.2 Clarify info with Submitter during review 4.1. Conduct Clinical Review 3.2 Collect Patient Advocacy Group Input Estimated 99 – 149 business days 7.4 Eligible for Early Conversion? No Yes ‡Next steps could include Recommendation implementation, Procedural Review or Resubmission 9
  • 10. pCODR Patient Evidence Submissions • As of April, 2011 there is a Submit & Contribute section at www.pcodr.ca • It allows registered patient advocacy groups to submit and contribute drug review information and input into the review process and initial recommendation • Groups must be registered with pCODR, but first you must be eligible to register • The registration process can take up to five business days and is done by way of an Online Registration Request
  • 11. pCODR Patient Evidence Submissions • Within two business days of submitting their request, patient advocacy groups will receive an e- mail from pCODR with instructions on the final steps to complete their registration • As part of completing their registration, patient advocacy groups will create a username and password allowing them to login to pCODR’s ‘secure Submit & Contribute page’ • Submissions are available at www.pcodr.ca by tracking a review • There are conditions for registration i.e. the mandate of the group must exist prior to registration
  • 12. pCODR Patient Evidence Submissions • Areas for input include: – Information about the group including declaration of COI – How was information gathered for submission – Experiences of patients with type of cancer (symptoms, limitations, quality of life, financial) with current treatment, impact on caregivers – Patient experiences with the new drug (medical, psychosocial) including risks and benefits, examples of better symptom management, ease of use
  • 13. Listings • Provinces and territories have (and will continue to have) the final word on whether a medication is publicly funded • Federal government does the same with their six public formularies (i.e. Non-Insured Health Benefit Program for Canadian First Nations and Inuit people, veterans, Canadian Forces members, designated migrants, RCMP and Correctional Service Canada) • 19 different public formularies, each with their own review and decision-making processes
  • 14. Oncology Listings - Ontario • Manufacturer or Disease Site Groups can make a submission to the province • From there it will be initially reviewed by the Steering Committee for Cancer Drug Programs (just being established now) • The Steering Committee will then make a recommendation to the Committee to Evaluate Drugs (CED) • CED - 10 physician/pharmacist members, plus 2 patient representatives, appointed by the government • CED mandated to make recommendations to the Executive Officer (EO) on which drugs should be reimbursed through the various Ontario Public Drug Programs • EO makes the final decision
  • 15. Patient Evidence Submissions - Ontario • New patient input process in place as of April 1, 2010 • Patient evidence submissions will be accepted from registered advocacy groups directly to the CED • There had never before been a process to allow this kind of direct engagement between the members of the CED and the public • Having said that, the process and guidelines around submissions are very narrow
  • 16. Patient Evidence Submissions - Ontario • Impact of the disease/condition • Treatment outcomes that matter most to patients • Information from patients who have used this drug • Does not ask how information was gathered to address these issues (still allows for surveys and patient interviews) • Information provided is collated by the ministry and reviewed and presented by a patient member of the CED, during the CED discussions of societal values and patient perspective of the drug product
  • 17. Advocacy Solutions® Contact Information: Ryan Clarke, LL.B. t. 905.891.0311 f. 905.891.0366 ryan@advocacysolutions.ca www.advocacysolutions.ca