3. GMS PROJECT TEAM
Project is being done in-house
Team Members:
Khalid Mohammed
Fazeel Elahi
Yuli Siao
Ian Fawcett
4. TOWN PLAN
Adopted August 2009
Sets out a vision for the future of the town
Two components:
1. Policies
2. Growth strategy
Growth Management Strategy
5. ANNEXATION
Town Plan - annexation for future growth
Town and MD – joint annexation proposal
Approved 1st January 2012
1769 acres N. and N.W. of boundary
Sufficient for 30 years growth
GMS is a plan for that area
Also addresses areas of undeveloped
land
7. GMS CONTENT
Policies for:
- land use and development
- roads and utility services
- community services
- protecting the environment
Diagrams indicating how and where
Progressively more detailed plans will follow
8. HIERARCHY OF PLANS
Town Plan
GMS
Area Structure Plans
Neighbourhood Plans
Zoning
Subdivision & Development
9. GMS PROGRESS
Preliminary work started last fall
Aim is to complete project by July 2012
3rd Open House
Focus of this Open House – draft policies
Next phase is drafting the Plan
Pre-consultation 2nd Open House 3rd Open House 4th Open House
1st Open House Key issues Draft policies Draft Plan
10. REGIONAL CONTEXT
Calgary Metropolitan Plan
High River identified as a growth area in region
High River pop. = 31,000 in 30 years
Current pop.= 13,000. Growth = 18,000
Min. 25% of future growth within urban area
(8,000 +/- = 10,000)
CMP - residential density = 8 - 10 upa
- higher wherever possible
Protect environment (river valley), scenic corridors
(Highway 543), views (mountains)
Must participate in regional utilities and transit
11. HIGH RIVER & FOOTHILLS
Inter-municipal Development Plan
To be adopted in 2012
Joint planning around town boundary
Protect all land in river valley – joint study
Plan for Highway 543/498 Avenue corridor
Plan for CR area
Plan for east of Highway 2
15. TOWN PLAN
Greater mix of housing types
Neighbourhoods to be more walkable and
to have local services
Roads to reflect more of a grid pattern
Review existing road standards
Ensure future transit is taken into account
16. GMS STUDIES
Environmental
Roads and Utilities study
MetroQuest
Talked to service providers
Talked to interest groups:
- general public
- landowners
- youth
- developers
17. PUBLIC RESPONSES – OPEN HOUSE #2
Question 1:
People often say they like the “small town feel” of High River.
What in your opinion are the defining characteristics of the “small
town feel” and how should we try to preserve and enhance those
characteristics in a plan for growth over the next 30 years?
Answer:
High River’s “small town feel” is comprised of both the tangible
(unique boutique shops of the downtown, Happy Trails and the
ample green space) and the intangible elements (such as good
social and servicing groups, respect and tolerance in the community,
and knowing your neighbours and community members).
18. PUBLIC RESPONSES – OPEN HOUSE #2
Question 2:
Some of the feedback we have received suggests that people would
like to see “more walkable” communities in the future.
What does this mean to you and what sort of features should we try to
provide in new communities to achieve this objective?
Answer:
Future communities of High River will feature multi-use and mixed
use developments that are walkable and integrated into active green
space with conscious continuation and expansion of the Happy
Trails pathways.
19. PUBLIC RESPONSES – OPEN HOUSE #2
Question 3:
Municipalities are being urged to reduce the footprint of new urban
growth and to grow more sustainably. This implies consuming less
land for major land uses (residential, recreation, commercial,
industrial, institutional) and infrastructure (roads and utilities).
How should we achieve this?
Answer:
Through the planning process, future developments within High
River will strive towards: mixing appropriate land uses, increasing
density and variety of housing options, creating more neighbourhood
commercial options, and where appropriate, making use of existing
buildings for new uses (adaptive reuse).
20. PUBLIC RESPONSES – OPEN HOUSE #2
Question 4:
We know that the population in Canada is aging and also that High
River is a valued location for retirees.
What sort of housing and community facilities do you think we should
promote over the next 30 years for this sector of the population?
Answer:
Over the next 30 years, High River will offer housing development
that is suited to various income levels, close to recreation and future
transit facilities, and flexible to accommodate “aging in place”.
21. GMS DRAFT POLICIES
Policies are preliminary for discussion
For annexation area
4 groups:
- General
- Environment
- Infrastructure
- Land use
22. DRAFT POLICIES - GENERAL
Incorporate CMP and IDP policies
Annexation area divided into 4 “cells”
ASP’S for each cell
NOP’s for smaller areas
24. DRAFT POLICIES
ENVIRONMENT
All river “lands” to be a joint study
No development within 30 metres of river
Protect access to river
Protect views – scenic corridor
Energy efficiency/water conservation/LID
Arts and culture to be integrated
25. DRAFT POLICIES
INFRASTRUCTURE
ROADS
Grid-based network
Location of key access points
Provide for future transit
Traffic calming
Link to adjacent areas
Extend Happy Trails
Reduce standards
26. DRAFT POLICIES
INFRASTRUCTURE
UTILITIES
Integrate consultant recommendations for
water, storm and sanitary
Storm ponds to also be used for recreation
and bio-retention
Protect/remove existing transmission line
27. DRAFT POLICIES
LAND USE
RESIDENTIAL
New areas to be compact and walkable
Density: minimum 8 – 10 upga
Range of housing types in all areas
2 main zones: low/medium density & high density
Housing preferred to be within 400m of
neighbourhood centre
Higher densities nearer centre
28. DRAFT POLICIES
LAND USE (cont) neighbourhood
centre
COMMERCIAL
Neighbourhood commercial only
No commercial fronting Highway 543
NC’s to provide day-to-day
retail/personal service needs
NC’s can also include: health,
recreation, day care, post office, library,
school, offices, emergency services,
parks, community services
Encourage mixed use, e.g. live/work
29. DRAFT POLICIES
LAND USE (cont)
INDUSTRIAL
No new industrial zoning
Existing industrial zoning to be phased out
Existing industrial buildings (2) can remain
Adaptive re-use to be encouraged
30. DRAFT POLICIES
LAND USE (cont)
OTHER
New leisure centre
New fire/police/ambulance facility
New Town shop/yard
Allow for Urban Agriculture
112th Street “triangle” to be included in IDP joint study
Municipal reserve land to be distributed on ASP basis
498
A ve
The “triangle”
.
112 St.
Urban agriculture
31. GMS DRAFT POLICIES
EXISTING URBAN AREA
Min. 25% of new development
Minimum residential density 10 upga
Higher wherever possible
Revisit existing approved plans
33. WHAT’S NEXT?
GMS project to be completed July 2012
Open House draft plan 16th May 2012
Town Plan to incorporate GMS policies –
early fall
34. SUMMARY
GMS policies are DRAFT
Need to know if we have missed any
Need to know if any create issues
Questionnaire: today, on-line
Deadline 3 weeks - April 5th