By Prof Jim Watson, UKERC
Presented at 'Staying on Target: Securing the UK's Energy Future in Challenging Times'; an event organised by the UK Energy Research Centre, on Wednesday 30 April 2014, 14.00-19.00, in London, United Kingdom.
WIPO magazine issue -1 - 2024 World Intellectual Property organization.
Â
Energy Strategies Under Uncertainty, Jim Watson, UKERC
1. Click to add title
Energy strategies under uncertainty
Jim Watson, Research Director
Staying on Target: Securing the UK's Energy Future in
Challenging Times, London, 30th April 2014
2. Overview
1. Context: the UKâs low carbon transition
2. Uncertainties project aims
3. Key uncertainties in electricity, heat and transport
4. What could be done to stay on course?
5. Conclusions
3. The UKâs low carbon transition
Keep the lights on
& bills down at the
same time
Source: Committee on Climate
5. Security of supply, affordability, and playing our part in
combating climate change. And that for me is the order
Michael Fallon, 2nd Dec 2013
Our energy security is best served by minimising our
exposure to the volatile global fossil fuel markets,
enhancing our energy efficiency and maximising home-
grown low carbon energy, as well as cleaner
indigenous reserves, such as natural gas, to help ease
the low carbon transition.
Ed Davey MP, Secretary of State for Energy & Climate
Change, Mar 2014
Uncertain political context
6. Click to add titleEnergy strategies under uncertainty
A two year research project carried out by a team of over
30 UKERC researchers across the UK
Ten commissioned papers plus a synthesis report and
special issue of academic journal Energy Policy
Two main aims:
ď§To generate, synthesise and communicate evidence about
the range and nature of the risks and uncertainties facing UK
energy policy and the achievement policy goals
ď§To identify strategies for mitigating risks and managing
uncertainties for public policy and the private sector
7. 3. Innovation systems & development
ď§ Focus on the CCCâs revised 4th
carbon budget pathway to 2030
ď§ Methods for appraising uncertainty
ď§ Instrumental uncertainties for CCC
pathway in power, heat and transport
ď§ Systemic uncertainties: natural
resources, public attitudes and
ecosystem services
ď§ Analysis includes engagement with
âalternativeâ higher carbon pathway
Energy strategies under uncertainty
17. Heat sector
decarbonisation
Transport sector
decarbonisation
District
heating
business
models
Other
low C
heat
vectors
Power
grid con-
straints
Heat
pump
costs;
per-
formance
Energy
efficiency
progress
Electricit
y decarb
progress
Transport and heat decarbonisation:
More flexibility?
Bio-
energy
resources
Eco-
system
services
Public
attitudes
Transport
modes /
demand
EV costs
and per-
formance
Per-
formance
of other
techs
18. Transport uncertainties:
electric vehicles
Policies already in place to
mitigate uncertainties, but more
action required including:
ď§ More certainty about financial
incentives for EV ownership
likely to improve adoption rates
ď§ Standardisation of payment
mechanisms for EV charging
ď§ More robust methods for
assessing EV environmental
performance and costs
19. Click to add titlePublic attitudes and values
ď§Public attitudes often framed very narrowly by expert
debates: on âacceptanceâ of specific technical options
ď§Publics are often pragmatic about change, but unlikely
to settle for change out of line with longer-term
trajectories that reflect underlying values
ď§Engagement should focus on how the energy system is
organised and paid for, not just technologies that could
be deployed
ď§Beware of potential ânon transitionsâ: e.g. significant
fossil fuel use; carbon capture & storage; bio-energy
20. Click to add titleStaying on course?
Instrumental uncertainties, e.g.
Complexity Impact Actions By who?
Commercialise
low carbon
electricity
technologies
⢠Long term policy
support
⢠Demonstration
funding for CCS
⢠Evaluations and
learning
⢠Govt and
innovation
funders
⢠Businesses
⢠Research
community
Heat pump
performance
⢠Demo & deployment
incentives
⢠Learning &
engagement with
consumers
⢠Government
⢠Innovation
funders
⢠Citizens /
businesses
⢠Research
community
21. Click to add titleStaying on course?
Systemic uncertainties, e.g.
Complexity Impact Actions By who?
Fossil fuel
availability and
price
⢠Energy efficiency
⢠Diversity
⢠Carbon pricing
⢠Governments
and regulator
⢠Businesses
⢠Citizens /
businesses
Ecosystem
service impacts
⢠Stronger evidence
base
⢠Decision making
tools
⢠Government
⢠Businesses
⢠Research
community
Public attitudes
to energy
system change
⢠Genuine engagement
with public on energy
system change
⢠Government
⢠Citizens
22. Click to add titleConclusions
ď§ Power sector decarbonisation by 2030 is critically important:
o No shortage of capital, but policy frameworks, market structures &
business models may need to change to attract that capital
o Limited options to 2030, but will be tough to keep them all âin the
low carbon raceâ. Need for evidence based decisions on priorities
ď§ More flexibility with heat and transport decarbonisation:
o Delayed electricity decarbonisation not a show stopper for heat
o More action needed on energy efficiency to provide more flexibility
o Support for demonstration & early deployment of heat & transport
options (e.g. district heating; EVs) to âopen upâ & test options
ď§ Need to move beyond narrow framing of public attitudes:
transitions that align with values more likely to be successful
ď§ Natural resources and ecosystem service impacts may limit
options and flexibility; driven partly by global trends
23. Click to add title
Thanks
http://www.ukerc.ac.uk
@UKERCHQ @watsonjim2
Editor's Notes
We conclude that public acceptability may only be achieved if it is rooted, in a significant way, in the described value system. Publics are unlikely to settle for a form of change that does not show signs of commitment to the longer-term trajectories commensurate with these values. If actors do not consider and take into account public values in their decision-making, resistance to energy system transformations or conflict over particular issues is more likely to result. However, pursuing energy system changes in ways that are in keeping with longer-term trajectories aligned with public values can form the basis of a social contract for change.
We conclude that public acceptability may only be achieved if it is rooted, in a significant way, in the described value system. Publics are unlikely to settle for a form of change that does not show signs of commitment to the longer-term trajectories commensurate with these values. If actors do not consider and take into account public values in their decision-making, resistance to energy system transformations or conflict over particular issues is more likely to result. However, pursuing energy system changes in ways that are in keeping with longer-term trajectories aligned with public values can form the basis of a social contract for change.
We conclude that public acceptability may only be achieved if it is rooted, in a significant way, in the described value system. Publics are unlikely to settle for a form of change that does not show signs of commitment to the longer-term trajectories commensurate with these values. If actors do not consider and take into account public values in their decision-making, resistance to energy system transformations or conflict over particular issues is more likely to result. However, pursuing energy system changes in ways that are in keeping with longer-term trajectories aligned with public values can form the basis of a social contract for change.
We conclude that public acceptability may only be achieved if it is rooted, in a significant way, in the described value system. Publics are unlikely to settle for a form of change that does not show signs of commitment to the longer-term trajectories commensurate with these values. If actors do not consider and take into account public values in their decision-making, resistance to energy system transformations or conflict over particular issues is more likely to result. However, pursuing energy system changes in ways that are in keeping with longer-term trajectories aligned with public values can form the basis of a social contract for change.
We conclude that public acceptability may only be achieved if it is rooted, in a significant way, in the described value system. Publics are unlikely to settle for a form of change that does not show signs of commitment to the longer-term trajectories commensurate with these values. If actors do not consider and take into account public values in their decision-making, resistance to energy system transformations or conflict over particular issues is more likely to result. However, pursuing energy system changes in ways that are in keeping with longer-term trajectories aligned with public values can form the basis of a social contract for change.