Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
1115 wed morar fairclough & vincent
1. Mobile Medical Education (MoMEd):
What is the impact of putting digital
mobile resources in the hands of medical
students?
Tim Vincent, Learning Technologist
Jil Fairclough, Medical School Librarian
3. In 2005, BSMS became the first UK medical school to
introduce the widespread use of mobile devices to its
students
Offered to all Year 3, 4, and 5
students (approx. 350 students)
Loaned PDA and software for free
5. Resources on the Dr Companion card
British National Formulary Oxford Concise Medical
Dictionary
Chemical Laboratory
References Oxford Handbook of
Emergency Medicine
Classification of Surgical
Operations & Procedures Oxford Handbook of
Clinical & Lab Investigation
Clinical Evidence
Oxford Handbook of
Cochrane Abstracts
Clinical Medicine
DSM IV
Oxford Handbook of
ICD 10 Clinical Surgery
NICE Compilation Oxford Handbook of
Guidance Practical Drug Therapy
Netter Atlas of Human Oxford Handbook of
Anatomy General Practice
Evidence Based Medicine Oxford Handbook of
Medical Sciences
Patient Organizations
6. Supporting set-up, roll-out, maintenance, and
training
Dir. of Undergraduate Studies Divisional assistant
Everyone!
IT Manager IT Technicians x2
Librarian
Learning Technologist
Clinical Research Fellow
7. Useful mobile technology in the clinical setting
The CCU consultant asks you
“What evidence is there for the
use of ACE inhibitors in
secondary prevention post MI?”
“And what dose is the SHO
writing up?”
8. Why mobile technology in medical training?
The future of education lies in BSMS, as a new medical
the adoption of technology, school, wants students to
such as mobile and wireless, become familiar with mobile
that connects people, unifies technology and take
the education process and advantage of the technology
enhances learning. to explore innovative
approaches to teaching and
learning.
Dr John D. Halamka, Associate Dean,
Harvard Medical School, 2002
Prof Jon Cohen, Dean of BSMS, 2003
9. GMC‟s: Tomorrow‟s Doctors (2009) expects
doctors to be able to “use information effectively in
a medical context”
“Access information sources and use
the information in relation to patient
care, health promotion, advice and
information to patients, and research
and education”
“Make effective use of computers
and other information systems,
including storing and retrieving
information.”
10. What is the impact of putting digital mobile
resources in the hands of medical students?
How much do medical What are the advantages
student really use mobile and disadvantages of
devices to access learning mobile devices in the
resources? clinical setting
What is the impact on
students’ learning?
12. Results: Amount of use over 10 month period
Questionnaire Tracking
Daily 101 – 1 – 10
Hardly 200
ever
Once a
week 51 –
Once a 100 11 – 50
month
13. Results: Most popular resource
Questionnaire Tracking
Choose 3 most No. of
Votes Most popular resource
popular resources uses
BNF 91 OH Clinical Medicine 3,385
OH Clinical Medicine 89 BNF 3,137
Medical dictionary 22 Medical dictionary 1,867
Netter‟s anatomy 19 OH General Practice 791
OH Clinical Surgery 884
14. Analysis: Three major themes identified
Access to Consolidation Need for
knowledge of knowledge change
Mobile Medical Education (MoMEd) - how mobile information resources contribute to learning for
undergraduate clinical students: a mixed methods study. Bethany S Davies, Jethin Rafique, Tim R
Vincent, Jil Fairclough, Mark H Packer, Richard Vincent and Inam Haq.
BMC Medical Education 2012, 12:1 doi:10.1186/1472-6920-12-1
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/12/1/abstract
15. Theme 1: Access to knowledge
Mobility Speed of access
Immediacy Two devices
16. Theme 1: Access to knowledge
Mobility Speed of access
Immediacy Two devices
“The only thing is, you don‟t have
that many pockets. I would have
my wallet in one pocket, my
phone in another. I found it quite
hard to carry [the PDA] around
with me all the time.”
“The whole two devices thing is
my major gripe.”
17. Theme 2: Consolidation of knowledge
Quick reference information
Repetition
Better use of „wasted‟ time
18. Theme 2: Consolidation of knowledge
Quick reference information
“It has enhanced [my knowledge]
Repetition by reinforcing key points at point-
Better use of „wasted‟ time of-need. If you want to know
then-and-there, you can find it
then-and-there. It‟s just the
memory jog you need to reinforce
the point a bit more. It doesn‟t
mean you‟re relying on the PDA
– it just helps to reinforce and
consolidate the knowledge a bit
better.”
19. Theme 2: Consolidation of knowledge
Quick reference information
“The more repetition I get, the
Repetition more I‟m able to look at
Better use of „wasted‟ time something quickly – when I need
to - the more it‟s likely to stick.
Because you can look and say
„oh ok, that‟s what it is again‟”
“Initially, you may look at it three
times and then after that you will
become more confident in saying
„yes I know this now‟”
20. Theme 2: Consolidation of knowledge
Quick reference information
“One of the drivers for me of
Repetition using it might be more general is
Better use of „wasted‟ time just my dislike of wasted time
particularly during the day.”
“I agree. Actually, that‟s one of the
reasons I have started to use it a
lot more. There and then when
there isn‟t anything to do you can
make use of time.”
22. Theme 3: Change
Attitude, behaviour, approach
“…if you remember to take it
Resistance to change with you”
Establishing change “I think it‟s about adopting a
different mentality.”
“I‟m worried that the nurses or
patients will think I am texting
or emailing”
23. Theme 3: Change
Attitude, behaviour, approach
“What changed your mind?”
Resistance to change “Finding I did use the PDA
Establishing change and it did come in handy
several times. It just makes
life a bit easier.”
“...I have definitely got used
to having that type of
reference at my fingertips. I
would definitely look into ways
of continuing that.”
24. Questions
1. What could you/your organisation contribute to a mobile
initiative in an HEI (any subject)?
(New/different apps? Types of resource? Usage tracking?)
2. If you were in charge of MoMEd, what models would you
choose for the next three years?
Give hardware with/without software? Don‟t provide anything??
3. What do you think is the impact on student learning
(particularly in a practice-based setting) of mobile
initiatives such as MoMEd?
(Is it improving retention of knowledge? Or creating over-reliance? How
will you feel if your doctor looks everything up on electronic devices? )
27. The emergence of smartphones
BSMS becomes the first UK Apple announces sales Apple becomes
medical school to introduce of 4.7m iPhones largest smartphone
the widespread use of PDAs vendor
to its students First Android phone
(G1) launches Smartphone
sales make
Steve Jobs unveils Apple up 31% of
the iPhone launches 1.8bn devices
iPad sold globally
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
28. What do the students want?
Nothing
Smartphone + PDA +
DrCompanion DrCompanion
Own
smartphone +
DrCompanion
29. iPhone pilot
4 month trial (Nov 2011-Feb 2012)
48 students with own iOS device
Novel logging to track usage
Contract to recording usage and
research participation
30. Changing the model to
information over technology
Offered to all students in years
3-5 with their own device
31. Thanks
Dr Inam Haq – Director of Undergraduate Studies
Dr Anna Jones, Dr Bethany Davies, Dr Jethin Rafique – Clinical Research
Fellows
Mark Packer – BSMS IT Manager
Jil Fairclough – BSMS Librarian
Tim Vincent – BSMs Learning Technologist
Tim Lambert – IT Technician
Notes de l'éditeur
In 2005, BSMS became the first UK medical school to introduce the widespread use of PDAs to its students.(Pilot: Group of year 2 students, 2004)1st release (autumn 2005): All year 3, 4 and 5 studentsloaned a PDA and the Dr Companion card for length of theircourse.Worked with MedHand International (already had architecture and content in mobile form) to provide an SD card with Dr Companiontm software, which contained a suite of carefully selected medical texts [listed later]. Provided core reference material to students ‘at the point of need’.[Information delivers value – technology only enables]What did we provide?
What we gave them(PDA = personal digital assistant)Portable,convenient method of conveying and exchanging information – now old technology but was advanced in early 2000s!Functionality including diary, calculator, email, games, file storageProvided Dr Companion software and also the module handbooks.3. The software also viewable on the PC. It had to be synchronised manually by plugging it into a PC in order for students to receive updates and us to receive usage data.
How do you establish an initiative like this?Set-up:Strategic meetings between all stakeholdersContracts and financeProcurement or hardware and softwareRoll-out:Notification talks in advanceDistribution sessions (hardware, software, contracts)Practical training sessions (syncho cards, using resources, charging)Educational training sessionsOngoing support:Weekly surgeries for technical supportEmail support[A]And then research supportWho does this?[A] Team of 7 people (3 CRFs)
Just give student PDAs and expect them to know how to use them? Use them effectively?Ran specific training sessions on how the devices could be usedE.g:Answer?[A]EBM:CardiovascularSecondary prevention of ischaemic cardiac eventsReduce mortality and cardiovascular eventsEvidence summariesACE inhibitors BNF:Index – ramiprilCheck indicationsCheck dose2.5mg bd started 3-10 days post infarct
Why mobile technology? How did mobile technology come on to the agenda at BSMS?“PDAs will be as common as the stethoscope”
What were our objectives?How much do medical students really use mobile devices to access learning resources? They might use them for social and personal use but to access/read medical reference texts? Big assumption.What are the pros and cons of accessing mobile information resources in the real-life clinical setting? Complex psychosocial factors could impact use of mobile devices in a significant wayUltimately, what is the impact on their learning?Provide a learning opportunity of gaining experience of using mobile devices and resources (cf Tomorrow’s Doctors)Direct students to high quality learning resources
Focus groups Four held with different studentsFeasibility study 181 respondentsInterim survey 9.6% (12/125)Post-study survey 57.4% (140 / 244)Usage tracking 124 students
Tracking:124/387 students, 10 month period
Dictionary use so high because the search tool is character accurate – won’t give near answers as modern search engines tend to do – so had to be exact spelling
Thematic analysis of the focus groups identified three major themes:Access to knowledgeConsolidation of knowledgeNeed for changeSee article in BMC Medical Education open access
Practicalityof using the devices for learning:Pros:Mobility – highly portable, can take in it into clinical areas and on transportImmediacy – Relevant at the point of need, just prior, during, or just after the real clinical encounter. Also, (once in to the book) finding info is only a few clicks away, hyperlinks to connected info, or cross search all the infoCons:Speed of access – although sometimes quick, the operating system was felt to be slow[A]
Two devices – was a significant problem [A]
How students use the device and information:Quick reference information – not long / primary exposure but short facts relevant to situation immediately prior, during, or postRepetition – used it multiple timesBetter use of ‘wasted’ time – waiting in clinical areas / travelling
[A]Quick reference information – not long / primary exposure but short facts relevant to situation immediately prior, during, or post exposure to trigger
[A]Repetition – used it multiple times
[A] Better use of ‘wasted’ time – waiting in clinical areas / travelling
Attitudinal and psychosocial domain on part of the students, healthcare staff, patients
[A] Attitude, behaviour, approach – learning curveResistance to change – psychosocial factors of multimedia devices in clinical settings
[A]
There are a few questions that we have:[A] Resources:Students have an increasing number of medical education apps available to them, and research shows they are willing to pay for them. Do we have to provide anything? Do we enter in some sort of validation? What if they are not bundled into one single app – can’t cross search[A] Technology:Ebook readers: Kindle – if these are static resources, should students just have a (cheaper) ebook reader?Tablets: iPads, Galaxy tab, RIM Playbook, Kindle Fire – more on the screen and could become better interface for interactive media e.g. medical imaging(January: Apple announce iBooks Author)(2010: University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Florida, provide iPads for all their students)[A] End the initiative?Is it an effective use of resources for the impact on training modern doctors? They have the information available in paper and electronically anyway… Consign it to the history books as valid and useful research but not where we want to invest…?[A] Impact on information retrievalWhat is the impact of encouraging medical students to look information up? Become reliant to the detriment of recall without the device?
So, in what direction should we continue with mobile provision in this climate of reduced budgets, increasing expectations, changing technologies?
Technology has moved on at an incredible pace, with significant developments affecting the way that information is stored and retrieved.Jan 2007: Steve Jobs unveils the iPhoneOctober 2008: Apple announces sales of 4.7m iPhones (13% of smartphone market)Nov 2008: First android phone, the G1 launches. May 2010: iPad launched in UKApril 2011: Apple becomes the largest smartphone vendor
Asked the students:BSMS do not provide students with any mobile learning devices nor resources to accompany themBSMS continue to provide a basic PDA and DrCompanion resourcesStudents use their own smartphone and BSMS provide resources compatible with those phonesBSMS provide students with a smartphone and DrCompanion resources for the duration of the course
4 month trial (Nov 2011 – Feb 2012)Invited year 3-5 students with own iOS device (iPhone/iPodTouch/iPad); 48 students agreed to participate.Worked with MedHand to develop novel logging to track usage (using ‘push’ tech) – more detailed and reliable than manual PDA version.Contract to provide data for research:Weekly diary usageParticipate in at least 1 focus groupPre and post study questionnaireStill analyzing the data but has been v helpful in honing the effectiveness of the app, esp novel data collection process.(Reduced set of resources (based on most commonly used in PDA research vs cost):)BNF 60OH Clinical Medicine OH General PracticeOH Clinical SurgeryOH Emergency MedicineOH Clinical Examination and Practical SkillsHarrison´s Manual of Medicine
Where do we go next?(Still analysing the data but has been very insightful and helpful in helping decide what our future direction should be)Both our research and the significant change in technology since we started, has led us to move to a new model of focussing solely on the provision of the resources rather than trying to provide the devices as well. Much easier, popular, and cost effective! We focus on providing the resources and let the student decide on the technology.Make suite of key resources available via the Dr Companion app on iPhone or Android operating systemsOffered to all students in years 3-5 with a smartphone can obtain the resourcesPDAs for those without (until next academic year)Blackberry? Windows mobile? Have the opportunity to go in this direction if we want to
[Information delivers value – technology only enables]For the moment, we are confident that this an effective tool that supports learning but it is an ever-changing world so we will need to be aware of this each step of the way.